1. Field of the Invention. This invention relates to arthroscopic tissue cutting and removal devices by which anatomical tissues may be cut and removed from a joint or other site. More specifically, this invention relates to instruments configured for cutting and removing soft tissue with an electrosurgical device.
In several surgical procedures including subacromial decompression, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction involving notchplasty, and arthroscopic resection of the acromioclavicular joint, there is a need for cutting and removal of bone and soft tissue. Currently, surgeons use arthroscopic shavers and burrs having rotational cutting surfaces to remove hard tissue in such procedures, and a need had existed for arthroscopic cutters that remove soft tissue rapidly.
Recently, arthroscopic surgical cutters capable of selectively removing both hard tissues and soft tissues have been developed. Such cutters are described in the following US patent Publications which are commonly assigned with the present application: US20130253498; US20160113706; US20160346036; US20160157916; and US20160081737, the full disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
While very effective, it would be desirable to provide arthroscopic surgical cutters and cutter systems as “reposable” devices with disposable cutting components and reusable, sterilizable handles. Preferably, the handles would incorporate as many of the high value system components as possible. Further preferably, the handle designs would have a minimum number of external connections to simplify sterilization and set-up. Still more preferably, the cutters and systems would allow for bipolar cutting as well as monopolar and mechanical (cutting blade) resection. At least some of these objectives will be met by the inventions described herein.
2. Description of the Background Art. Various surgical systems have been disclosed that include a handpiece and/or motor drive that is coupled to a disposable electrosurgical cutter assembly, including U.S. Pat. No. 3,945,375; 4.815.462; 5,810,809; 5,957,884; 6.007.553; 6,629.986 6,827,725; 7,112.200 and 9,504,521. One commercially available RF shaver sold under the tradename DYONICS Bonecutter Electroblade Resector (See, http://www.smith-nephew.com/professional/products/all-products/dyonics-bonecutter-electroblade) utilizes an independent or separate RF electrical cable that carries neither motor power nor electrical signals and couples directly to an exposed part or external surface of the prior art shaver hub. The electrical cable must be routed distally in parallel to a reusable handle. In such a prior art device, the coupling of RF does not extend through the reusable handle. The use of Hall effect sensors for monitoring rotational speed of an inner sleeve relative to an outer sleeve in an electrosurgical cutter is described in US 2016/0346036 and US 2017/0027599, both having a common inventor with the present application. Other commonly assigned published US patent applications have been listed above, including US20130253498; US20160113706; US20160346036; US20160157916; and US20160081737.
In general, arthroscopic systems according to the present invention include a re-useable, sterilizable handle or handpiece integrated with a single umbilical cable or conduit. The single umbilical cable or conduit carries electrical power from a power and/or control console to the handle for operating both a motor drive unit within the handle and for delivering the RF power to a disposable RF probe or cutter which may be detachably connected to the handle. The RF power delivered to the handle and on to the probe or cutter is typically bi-polar, where the handle includes first and second electrical bi-polar contacts that couple to corresponding bi-polar electrical contacts on a hub of the disposable RF probe or cutter that is connected to the handle.
In a first aspect, the present invention provides a disposable bipolar RF probe for use in the presence of an electrically conductive fluid. The probe comprises a shaft including an inner electrically conductive sleeve and an outer electrically conductive sleeve and a hub having a central passage. Opposing polarity regions of the inner and outer electrically conductive sleeves are present, typically exposed, in the central passage, and the opposing polarity regions have a spacing therebetween which inhibits intrusion of the conductive fluid and limits RF or other current flow between said opposing polarity regions when, for example, a distal working end of the probe is immersed in or otherwise in the presence of a conductive fluid during use.
The proximal hub of the disposable bipolar RF probe is typically configured or adapted for detachable coupling to a handle carrying first and second electrical contacts for coupling RF current through the hub to said first and second conductive sleeves. The inner and outer electrically conductive sleeves may be configured to couple RF current flow to respective first and second opposing polarity electrodes in the working end of the probe, and the intrusion of conductive fluid is usually limited sufficiently in the interior and central passage of the hub so that RF current flow to the working end is in presence of the conductive fluid is unimpeded.
In specific examples of the disposable bipolar RF probe, at least a portion of the inner electrically conductive sleeve is rotationally disposed in a bore of the outer electrically conductive sleeve, and said opposing polarity regions are longitudinally spaced apart in the interior of the hub by a distance selected to at least substantially impede or limit RF current flow between said opposing polarity regions during use. The selected distance is usually at least 0.5 inch, often at least 0.6 inch, frequently at least 0.8 inch, and sometimes at least 1 inch, or longer. The inner and outer sleeves are separated by an annular space in the hub of usually less than 0.010 inch, often less than 0.004 inch, and frequently less than 0.002 inch to further minimize fluid intrusion and maximize electrical resistance between said opposing polarity regions.
In a second aspect of the present invention, an arthroscopic treatment system comprises a disposable bipolar RF probe as described above and a handle, where the handle includes a motor drive unit for rotating the second conductive sleeve when the disposable bipolar RF probe is coupled to the hub.
In a third aspect of the present invention, a surgical system comprises a handle carrying a motor drive unit. A disposable RF probe has a proximal hub that detachably couples to the handle, an RF effector, and a component that is driven by the motor drive unit. At least one Hall sensor is carried by or otherwise coupled the motor drive unit to provide signals representative of motor operating parameters. A controller is operatively coupled to the motor and the RF probe by an umbilical conduit that includes (i) an electrical cable for delivering electrical power to the motor, (ii) an RF cable for delivering RF power to the RF effector, and (iii) at least one signal circuit including a signal cable for delivering signals from Hall signals to the controller. Typically, at least one Schmitt trigger operatively coupled to the at least one signal circuit for reducing noise induction therein.
As used herein, the phrase “Hall effect sensor” refers to a transducer or equivalent analog or digital circuitry that varies its output voltage in response to a magnetic field. Typically, the Hall effect sensor operates as an analog transducer, directly outputting a voltage signal induced by the motor drive in the handle to analog or digital circuitry in a controller or other control circuitry in the control console of the present invention for the purposes described in detail below.
As used herein, the phrase “Schmitt trigger” refers to a comparator circuit with hysteresis implemented by applying positive feedback to the noninverting input of a comparator or differential amplifier. It is an analog or digital active circuit which converts an analog input signal to a digital output signal and may be implemented in the control circuitry of the systems of the present invention for the purposes described in detail below.
In exemplary embodiments of the surgical systems of the present invention, a plurality of Hall sensors are carried by or otherwise coupled to the handle and the motor drive unit, where each Hall sensor comprises a signal circuit connected by a signal cable in the umbilical conduit to the controller. A first Schmitt trigger is located in a handle end of each signal circuit and a second Schmitt trigger is located in a controller end of each signal circuit. For example, three Hall sensors may be carried by or otherwise coupled to the handle and the motor drive unit wherein each of the three Hall sensors comprises a signal circuit connected by a signal cable in the umbilical conduit to the controller, and a Schmitt trigger may be located in a handle end of each of the three signal circuits and another Schmitt trigger may be located in a controller end of each of the three signal circuits.
In a fourth aspect of the present invention, a surgical system comprises a handle carrying a motor drive unit including Hall sensors therein. A disposable RF probe has a proximal hub that detachably couples to the handle, and the RF probe has an RF effector and a component that is driven by the motor drive unit. A single umbilical conduit extends from the handle to a control console, and the single conduit includes (i) an electrical cable for delivering electrical power to the motor, (ii) an RF cable for delivering RF power to the RF effector, and (iii) a plurality of signal cables for carrying Hall sensor signals. The surgical system may further comprise a first Schmitt trigger coupled to each signal cable at a handle end thereof and a second Schmitt trigger coupled to each signal cable at a console end thereof.
In a fifth aspect of the present invention, a method of operating an arthroscopic treatment system comprises providing a disposable RF treatment device detachably coupled to a handle that carries a motor drive unit, where the handle is coupled to a control console through a single conduit. Power is delivered to the motor and the RF device through first and second respective electrical cables in the single conduit. A Hall sensor coupled to the motor drive sends motor operating parameter signals to the control console in a signal circuit including an electrical cable in the single conduit. At least one Schmitt trigger in the signal circuit reduces noise induction therein due to the proximity of the first and second electrical cables.
In a sixth aspect of the present invention, an arthroscopic system comprises a probe having a distal bipolar element and a proximal hub having a first polarity electrical contact and a second polarity electrical contact. A handle having a distal cylindrical passageway is configured to removably receive the proximal hub of the probe, and the hub has a first polarity electrical contact and a second polarity electrical contact. The first polarity electrical contact and the second polarity electrical contact on the hub engage the first polarity electrical contact and the second polarity electrical contact in the passageway, and the first and second electrical contacts in the distal passageway of the handle comprise a conductive material which is resistant to alternating current corrosion.
In specific embodiments, the first and second electrical contacts in the distal passageway of the handle may comprise or are plated with a material selected from the group consisting of titanium, gold, silver, platinum, carbon, molybdenum, tungsten, zinc. Inconel, graphite, nickel or a combination thereof. The first and second electrical contacts in the distal passageway of the handle may be axially spaced-apart and exposed on an inner surface of the distal passageway, where the first and second electrical contacts may comprise ring-like contacts which extend circumferentially around at least a portion of the cylindrical passageway, typically extending 360° around the inner surface of the cylindrical passageway. The arthroscopic systems may further comprise a fluid seal between the hub and the cylindrical passageway, where the fluid seal often comprises at least one O-ring disposed on the inner surface of the cylindrical passageway. The fluid seal further may further comprises at least one O-ring disposed on the proximal hub of the probe, and at least one of the O-rings is disposed between the axially spaced apart electrical contacts. Often, at least one O-ring is also disposed proximally of all of the electrical contacts and at least one of the O-rings is disposed distally of all of the electrical contacts.
In other embodiments, the handle carries a motor drive unit with a non-detachable umbilical conduit, where said umbilical conduit carries a plurality of electrical cables. Usually, at least one electrical cable is connected to drive the motor drive unit, at least one cable is connected to the first polarity electrical contact in the passageway, and at least one cable is connected to the second polarity electrical contact in the passageway. The umbilical conduit may further carry one or more electrical cables for signaling and control functions, and the first polarity electrical contact and the second polarity electrical contact on the proximal hub of the probe may comprise spring-loaded elements on an outer surface of the hub.
Various embodiments of the present invention will now be discussed with reference to the appended drawings. It should be appreciated that the drawings depict only typical embodiments of the invention and are therefore not to be considered limiting in scope.
The present invention relates to bone cutting and removal devices and related methods of use. Several variations of the invention will now be described to provide an overall understanding of the principles of the form, function and methods of use of the devices disclosed herein. In general, the present disclosure provides for an arthroscopic cutter or burr assembly for cutting or abrading bone that is disposable and is configured for detachable coupling to a non-disposable handle and motor drive component. This description of the general principles of this invention is not meant to limit the inventive concepts in the appended claims.
In general, the present invention provides a high-speed rotating ceramic cutter or burr that is configured for use in many arthroscopic surgical applications, including but not limited to treating bone in shoulders, knees, hips, wrists, ankles and the spine. More in particular, the device includes a cutting member that is fabricated entirely of a ceramic material that is extremely hard and durable, as described in detail below. A motor drive is operatively coupled to the ceramic cutter to rotate the burr edges at speeds ranging from 3,000 rpm to 20,000 rpm.
In one variation shown in
The cutter assembly 100 has a shaft 110 extending along longitudinal axis 115 that comprises an outer sleeve 120 and an inner sleeve 122 rotatably disposed therein with the inner sleeve 122 carrying a distal ceramic cutting member 125. The shaft 110 extends from a proximal hub assembly 128 wherein the outer sleeve 120 is coupled in a fixed manner to an outer hub 140A which can be an injection molded plastic, for example, with the outer sleeve 120 insert molded therein. The inner sleeve 122 is coupled to an inner hub 140B (phantom view) that is configured for coupling to the motor drive unit 105 (
Referring to
In
Now referring to
The authors evaluated technical ceramic materials and tested prototypes to determine which ceramics are best suited for the non-metal cutting member 125. When comparing the material hardness of the ceramic cutters of the invention to prior art metal cutters, it can easily be understood why typical stainless steel bone burrs are not optimal. Types 304 and 316 stainless steel have hardness ratings of 1.7 and 2.1, respectively, which is low and a fracture toughness ratings of 228 and 278, respectively, which is very high. Human bone has a hardness rating of 0.8, so a stainless steel cutter is only about 2.5 times harder than bone. The high fracture toughness of stainless steel provides ductile behavior which results in rapid cleaving and wear on sharp edges of a stainless steel cutting member. In contrast, technical ceramic materials have a hardness ranging from approximately 10 to 15, which is five to six times greater than stainless steel and which is 10 to 15 times harder than cortical bone. As a result, the sharp cutting edges of a ceramic remain sharp and will not become dull when cutting bone. The fracture toughness of suitable ceramics ranges from about 5 to 13 which is sufficient to prevent any fracturing or chipping of the ceramic cutting edges. The authors determined that a hardness-to-fracture toughness ratio (“hardness-toughness ratio”) is a useful term for characterizing ceramic materials that are suitable for the invention as can be understood form the Chart A below, which lists hardness and fracture toughness of cortical bone, a 304 stainless steel, and several technical ceramic materials.
As can be seen in Chart A, the hardness-toughness ratio for the listed ceramic materials ranges from 98× to 250× greater than the hardness-toughness ratio for stainless steel 304. In one aspect of the invention, a ceramic cutter for cutting hard tissue is provided that has a hardness-toughness ratio of at least 0.5:1, 0.8:1 or 1:1.
In one variation, the ceramic cutting member 125 is a form of zirconia. Zirconia-based ceramics have been widely used in dentistry and such materials were derived from structural ceramics used in aerospace and military armor. Such ceramics were modified to meet the additional requirements of biocompatibility and are doped with stabilizers to achieve high strength and fracture toughness. The types of ceramics used in the current invention have been used in dental implants, and technical details of such zirconia-based ceramics can be found in Volpato, et al., “Application of Zirconia in Dentistry: Biological. Mechanical and Optical Considerations”, Chapter 17 in Advances in Ceramics—Electric and Magnetic Ceramics, Bioceramics, Ceramics and Environment (2011).
In one variation, the ceramic cutting member 125 is fabricated of an yttria-stabilized zirconia as is known in the field of technical ceramics, and can be provided by CoorsTek Inc., 16000 Table Mountain Pkwy., Golden. CO 80403 or Superior Technical Ceramics Corp., 600 Industrial Park Rd., St. Albans City, Vt. 05478. Other technical ceramics that may be used consist of magnesia-stabilized zirconia, ceria-stabilized zirconia, zirconia toughened alumina and silicon nitride. In general, in one aspect of the invention, the monolithic ceramic cutting member 125 has a hardness rating of at least 8 Gpa (kg/mm2). In another aspect of the invention, the ceramic cutting member 125 has a fracture toughness of at least 2 MPam1/2.
The fabrication of such ceramics or monoblock components are known in the art of technical ceramics, but have not been used in the field of arthroscopic or endoscopic cutting or resecting devices. Ceramic part fabrication includes molding, sintering and then heating the molded part at high temperatures over precise time intervals to transform a compressed ceramic powder into a ceramic monoblock which can provide the hardness range and fracture toughness range as described above. In one variation, the molded ceramic member part can have additional strengthening through hot isostatic pressing of the part. Following the ceramic fabrication process, a subsequent grinding process optionally may be used to sharpen the cutting edges 175 of the burr (see
In
Referring to
It can be understood that the ceramic cutting members can eliminate the possibility of leaving metal particles in a treatment site. In one aspect of the invention, a method of preventing foreign particle induced inflammation in a bone treatment site comprises providing a rotatable cutter fabricated of a ceramic material having a hardness of at least 8 Gpa (kg/mm2) and/or a fracture toughness of at least 2 MPam1/2 and rotating the cutter to cut bone without leaving any foreign particles in the treatment site. The method includes removing the cut bone tissue from the treatment site through an aspiration channel in a cutting assembly.
In the variation illustrated in
The active electrode arrangement 425 can consist of a single conductive metal element or a plurality of metal elements as shown in
As can be seen in
Another aspect of the invention is illustrated in
In general, the tissue resecting system comprises an elongated shaft with a distal tip comprising a ceramic member, a window in the ceramic member connected to an interior channel in the shaft and an electrode arrangement in the ceramic member positioned distal to the window and having a width that is at 50% of the width of the window, at 80% of the width of the window or at 100% of the width of the window. Further, the system includes a negative pressure source 160 in communication with the interior channel 420.
Now turning to
Under endoscopic vision, referring to
In general, a method corresponding to the invention includes providing an elongated shaft with a working end 400 comprising an active electrode 425 carried adjacent to a window 415 that opens to an interior channel in the shaft which is connected to a negative pressure source, positioning the active electrode and window in contact with targeted tissue in a fluid-filled space, activating the negative pressure source to thereby suction targeted tissue into the window and delivering RF energy to the active electrode to ablate tissue while translating the working end across the targeted tissue. The method further comprises aspirating tissue debris through the interior channel 420. In a method, the working end 400 is translated to remove a surface portion of the targeted tissue. In a variation of the method, the working end 400 is translated to undercut the targeted tissue to thereby remove chips 488 of tissue.
Now turning to
In one variation, the console 810 of
Of particular interest, the system of the invention includes a handle 804 with first and second electrical contacts 845A and 845B, typically ring-like contacts that form a continuous conductive path circumscribing an inner wall of a receiving passageway 846 of handle 804 (see
The RF shaver 822 includes the shaft portion 855 that extends to the working end 856 that carries a bi-polar electrode arrangement, of the type shown in
As described previously with respect to
One commercially available RF shaver sold under the tradename DYONICS Bonecutter Electroblade Resector (See, http://www.smith-nephew.com/professional/products/all-products/dyonics-bonecutter-electroblade) utilizes an independent or separate RF electrical cable that carries neither motor power nor electrical signals and couples directly to an exposed part or external surface of the prior art shaver hub. The electrical cable must be routed distally in parallel to a reusable handle. In such a prior art device, the coupling of RF does not extend through the reusable handle.
The present invention employs a unitary umbilical cable or conduit 805 for coupling the handle 804 to console 810, as shown in
In one aspect of the invention, referring to
In this application, if stainless steel electrical contacts were used, RF alternating currents that would pass between such stainless steel contact surfaces would consist of a blend of capacitive and resistive current. The resistance between the contacting surfaces of the contacts is referred to as the polarization resistance, which is the transformation resistance that converts electron conductance into current conductance while capacitance makes up the electrochemical layer of the stainless steel surface. The capacitive portion of the current does not lead to corrosion, but causes reduction and oxidation of various chemical species on the metal surface. The resistive part of the current is the part that causes corrosion in the same manner as direct current corrosion. The association between the resistive and capacitive current components is known in alternating current corrosion and such resistance currents can leads to very rapid corrosion.
In one aspect of the invention, to prevent such alternating current corrosion, the electrical contacts 845A and 845B (
In another aspect of the invention, the motor shaft 860 (
In another aspect of the invention, the receiving passageway 846 of the handle 804 includes an O-ring 852 or other fluid seal between the hub 820 and passageway 846, as shown in
Referring now to
As can be seen in
The outer sleeve 870 has an exterior insulating layer 890, such as a heat shrink polymer, that extends distally from hub 820 over the shaft 855. The inner sleeve 875 similarly has a heat shrink polymer layer 892 over it outer surface which electrically isolates or separates the inner sleeve 875 from the outer sleeve 870 throughout the length of the shaft 855.
The electrical pathways from the handle 804 to the outer and inner sleeves 870 and 875 are established by the first or proximal-most, spring-loaded electrical contact 850A disposed on an exterior surface of hub 820. The electrical contact 850A is configured to engage the corresponding electrical contact 845A in the handle 804, as shown in
Referring still to
As the working end 856 of the RF probe or cutter 822 will be immersed a conductive saline or other solution during use, the conductive solution will inevitably migrate, typically by capillary action, in a proximal through an annular space 885 between an inner wall of the bore or longitudinal passageway 877 and an outer wall of the insulator layer 892 over inner sleeve 875. Although this annular space or passageway 885 is very small, saline solution still will migrate over the duration of an arthroscopic procedure, which can be from 5 minutes to an hour or more. As can be understood from
In one embodiment intended to eliminate such short-circuit RF current flow, shown in
In other embodiments, other structure or modifications can be provided to reduce or eliminate the amount of conductive saline solution migrating through the annular gap 905 between the opposing polarity regions 900A and 900B. For example.
As described above, the single umbilical cable or conduit 805 that extends from the handle 804 to console 810 includes multiple electrical cables, wires, or other electrical conductors for powering and operating the motor drive unit 828, for delivering RF energy to the RF probe 822 and for other signaling and control functions as described below.
The single umbilical cable or conduit 805 carries a motor power cable 915 and a RF bipolar cable 916. Cables 920 are provided for power and ground to a circuit board in handle 804. Cable 922 is connected to a Hall sensor (not shown) in handle 804 which detects the rotational position of a magnetic element 924 on coupler 862 (see
As can be seen in
As signals from the Hall sensors 945a. 945b and 945b travel over the length of the cables 942a, 942b and 942c (see
Although particular embodiments of the present invention have been described above in detail, it will be understood that this description is merely for purposes of illustration and the above description of the invention is not exhaustive. Specific features of the invention are shown in some drawings and not in others, and this is for convenience only and any feature may be combined with another in accordance with the invention. A number of variations and alternatives will be apparent to one having ordinary skills in the art. Such alternatives and variations are intended to be included within the scope of the claims. Particular features that are presented in dependent claims can be combined and fall within the scope of the invention. The invention also encompasses embodiments as if dependent claims were alternatively written in a multiple dependent claim format with reference to other independent claims.
Although particular embodiments of the present invention have been described above in detail, it will be understood that this description is merely for purposes of illustration and the above description of the invention is not exhaustive. Specific features of the invention are shown in some drawings and not in others, and this is for convenience only and any feature may be combined with another in accordance with the invention. A number of variations and alternatives will be apparent to one having ordinary skills in the art. Such alternatives and variations are intended to be included within the scope of the claims. Particular features that are presented in dependent claims can be combined and fall within the scope of the invention. The invention also encompasses embodiments as if dependent claims were alternatively written in a multiple dependent claim format with reference to other independent claims.
Other variations are within the spirit of the present invention. Thus, while the invention is susceptible to various modifications and alternative constructions, certain illustrated embodiments thereof are shown in the drawings and have been described above in detail. It should be understood, however, that there is no intention to limit the invention to the specific form or forms disclosed, but on the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, alternative constructions, and equivalents falling within the spirit and scope of the invention, as defined in the appended claims.
The use of the terms “a” and “an” and “the” and similar referents in the context of describing the invention (especially in the context of the following claims) are to be construed to cover both the singular and the plural, unless otherwise indicated herein or clearly contradicted by context. The terms “comprising,” “having.” “including,” and “containing” are to be construed as open-ended terms (i.e., meaning “including, but not limited to.”) unless otherwise noted. The term “connected” is to be construed as partly or wholly contained within, attached to, or joined together, even if there is something intervening. Recitation of ranges of values herein are merely intended to serve as a shorthand method of referring individually to each separate value falling within the range, unless otherwise indicated herein, and each separate value is incorporated into the specification as if it were individually recited herein. All methods described herein can be performed in any suitable order unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context. The use of any and all examples, or exemplary language (e.g., “such as”) provided herein, is intended merely to better illuminate embodiments of the invention and does not pose a limitation on the scope of the invention unless otherwise claimed. No language in the specification should be construed as indicating any non-claimed element as essential to the practice of the invention.
Preferred embodiments of this invention are described herein, including the best mode known to the inventors for carrying out the invention. Variations of those preferred embodiments may become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon reading the foregoing description. The inventors expect skilled artisans to employ such variations as appropriate, and the inventors intend for the invention to be practiced otherwise than as specifically described herein. Accordingly, this invention includes all modifications and equivalents of the subject matter recited in the claims appended hereto as permitted by applicable law. Moreover, any combination of the above-described elements in all possible variations thereof is encompassed by the invention unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context.
All references, including publications, patent applications, and patents, cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each reference were individually and specifically indicated to be incorporated by reference and were set forth in its entirety herein
A number of embodiments of the invention have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/454,690, filed Mar. 9, 2017, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 11,207,119, which claims priority to Provisional Application No. 62/307,229, filed Mar. 11, 2016, Provisional Application No. 62/308,705, filed Mar. 15, 2016, and Provisional Application No. 62/308,743, filed Mar. 15, 2016, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2513564 | Ingwersen | Jul 1950 | A |
2514545 | Ingwersen | Jul 1950 | A |
2625625 | Ingwersen | Jan 1953 | A |
2689895 | Ingwersen | Sep 1954 | A |
3611023 | Souza et al. | Oct 1971 | A |
3838242 | Goucher | Sep 1974 | A |
3848211 | Russell | Nov 1974 | A |
3868614 | Riendeau | Feb 1975 | A |
3899829 | Storm et al. | Aug 1975 | A |
3903891 | Brayshaw | Sep 1975 | A |
3945375 | Banko | Mar 1976 | A |
4060088 | Morrison, Jr. et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4272687 | Borkan | Jun 1981 | A |
4781175 | Mcgreevy et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4815462 | Clark | Mar 1989 | A |
4895146 | Draenert | Jan 1990 | A |
4936842 | D'Amelio et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4977346 | Gibson et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5012495 | Munroe et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5122138 | Manwaring | Jun 1992 | A |
5207675 | Canady | May 1993 | A |
5256138 | Burek et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5281217 | Edwards et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5433721 | Hooven et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5449356 | Walbrink et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5490854 | Fisher et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5520634 | Fox et al. | May 1996 | A |
5641251 | Leins et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5669907 | Platt, Jr. et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5683366 | Eggers et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5702420 | Sterling et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5720745 | Farin et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5759185 | Grinberg | Jun 1998 | A |
5766195 | Nobles | Jun 1998 | A |
5776092 | Farin et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5810809 | Rydell | Sep 1998 | A |
5823971 | Robinson et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5839897 | Bordes | Nov 1998 | A |
5849010 | Wurzer et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5857995 | Thomas et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5873855 | Eggers et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5888198 | Eggers et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5891095 | Eggers et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5904681 | West, Jr. | May 1999 | A |
5913867 | Dion | Jun 1999 | A |
5954731 | Yoon | Sep 1999 | A |
5957884 | Hooven | Sep 1999 | A |
5964752 | Stone | Oct 1999 | A |
5989248 | Tu et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6007553 | Hellenkamp et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6013075 | Avramenko et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6013076 | Goble et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6024733 | Eggers et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6032674 | Eggers et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6039736 | Platt, Jr. | Mar 2000 | A |
6056747 | Saadat et al. | May 2000 | A |
6066134 | Eggers et al. | May 2000 | A |
6099523 | Kim et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6142992 | Cheng et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6149620 | Baker et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6159208 | Hovda et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6193715 | Wrublewski et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6225883 | Wellner et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6235020 | Cheng et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6238391 | Olsen et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6261241 | Burbank et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6296636 | Cheng et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6332886 | Green | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6342061 | Kauker | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6348051 | Farin et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6394956 | Chandrasekaran et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6413256 | Truckai et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6419674 | Bowser et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6443948 | Suslov | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6475215 | Tanrisever | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6538549 | Renne et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6579289 | Schnitzler | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6610059 | West, Jr. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6629986 | Ross et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6632220 | Eggers et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6656195 | Peters et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6669694 | Shadduck | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6720856 | Pellon et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6780178 | Palanker et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6783533 | Green et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6821275 | Truckai et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6827725 | Batchelor et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6837884 | Woloszko | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6837888 | Ciarrocca et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6890332 | Truckai et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6902564 | Morgan et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6979332 | Adams | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7087054 | Truckai et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7112200 | Cucin | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7150747 | Mcdonald et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7220261 | Truckai et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7309849 | Truckai et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7549989 | Morgan et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7674263 | Ryan | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7678069 | Baker et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7713269 | Auge, II et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7717710 | Danger et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7744595 | Truckai et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7771422 | Auge, II et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7819861 | Auge, II et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7819864 | Morgan et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7955331 | Truckai et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8012153 | Woloszko et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8016823 | Shadduck | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8062319 | Oquinn et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8075555 | Truckai et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8192424 | Woloszko | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8192428 | Truckai et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8197483 | Faulhaber et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8221404 | Truckai | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8323280 | Germain et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8333763 | Truckai et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
9005203 | Nelson et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9179923 | Gubellini et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9504521 | Deutmeyer et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9585675 | Germain et al. | Mar 2017 | B1 |
9603656 | Germain et al. | Mar 2017 | B1 |
10595889 | Germain et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
20030014051 | Woloszko | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030083681 | Moutafis et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030125727 | Truckai et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030135151 | Deng | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030163135 | Hathaway | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040044341 | Truckai et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040167427 | Quick et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050015085 | Mcclurken et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050075630 | Truckai et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050228372 | Truckai et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060058782 | Truckai et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060074345 | Hibner | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060178670 | Woloszko et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060224154 | Shadduck et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060264927 | Ryan | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070213704 | Truckai et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080003255 | Kerr et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080027448 | Raus et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080103494 | Rioux et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080188848 | Deutmeyer et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080208249 | Blain et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080249533 | Godin | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080249553 | Gruber et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090076498 | Saadat et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090209946 | Swayze et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090248019 | Falkenstein et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090270849 | Truckai et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100057078 | Arts et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100087816 | Roy | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100100091 | Truckai | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100305565 | Truckai et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110160723 | Tullis et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110282373 | Chekan et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110301578 | Muniz-Medina et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120029545 | Nelson et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120209112 | Patel et al. | Aug 2012 | A2 |
20120245580 | Germain et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120310256 | Brisson | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120330292 | Shadduck et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130041360 | Farritor et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130122461 | Shioiri | May 2013 | A1 |
20130172870 | Germain et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130253498 | Germain et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130267937 | Shadduck et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130296847 | Germain et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130296849 | Germain et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130317492 | Truckai et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130317493 | Truckai et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130331833 | Bloom | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140005680 | Shelton, IV et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140012238 | Chen et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140025046 | Williams et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140100567 | Edwards et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140114300 | Orczy-timko et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140336643 | Orczy-timko et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150209061 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150272569 | Leimbach et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160081737 | Germain et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160113706 | Truckai et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160157916 | Germain et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160346036 | Orczy-timko et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170027599 | Bek et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170128083 | Germain et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170258512 | Germain et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170258519 | Germain et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170290602 | Germain et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20190008537 | Kirstgen et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190008541 | Norton et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
200998857 | Jan 2008 | CN |
101507635 | Aug 2009 | CN |
103857354 | Jun 2014 | CN |
103948427 | Jul 2014 | CN |
104487007 | Apr 2015 | CN |
105377159 | Mar 2016 | CN |
109561846 | Apr 2019 | CN |
102005059864 | Jun 2007 | DE |
0119405 | Sep 1984 | EP |
1034747 | Sep 2000 | EP |
3426140 | Jan 2019 | EP |
2019509805 | Apr 2019 | JP |
WO-0053112 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO-0062685 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO-0053112 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO-2007073867 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO-2014165715 | Oct 2014 | WO |
WO-2015100310 | Jul 2015 | WO |
WO-2017151993 | Sep 2017 | WO |
WO-2017156335 | Sep 2017 | WO |
WO-2017156343 | Sep 2017 | WO |
WO-2017180654 | Oct 2017 | WO |
WO-2019067460 | Apr 2019 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/960,084, Final Office Action mailed Aug. 18, 2016”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/960,084, Non Final Office Action mailed May 3, 2016”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/960,084, Notice of Allowance mailed Jan. 6, 2017”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/977,256, Non Final Office Action mailed Jul. 28, 2016”, 20 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/977,256, Notice of Allowance mailed Feb. 8, 2017”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/977,256, Notice of Allowance mailed Dec. 2, 2016”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/977,256, Notice of Allowance mailed Dec. 30, 2016”. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/096,546, Non Final Office Action mailed Sep. 26, 2016”, 20 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/454,690, Advisory Action mailed Apr. 13, 2021”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/454,690, Final Office Action mailed Feb. 25, 2021”, 18 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/454,690, Non Final Office Action mailed May 29, 2020”, 18 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/454,690, Notice of Allowance mailed Aug. 24, 2021”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/454,690, Response filed Apr. 2, 2021 to Final Office Action mailed Feb. 25, 2021”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/454,690, Response filed May 12, 2020 to Restriction Requirement mailed Apr. 22, 2020”, 1 pg. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/454,690, Response filed Nov. 24, 2020 to Non Final Office Action mailed May 29, 2020”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/454,690, Restriction Requirement mailed Apr. 22, 2020”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/483,940, Non Final Office Action mailed Aug. 20, 2019”, 18 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/483,940, Notice of Allowance mailed Nov. 13, 2019”, 10 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201780029225.1, Office Action mailed Aug. 4, 2021”, with English translation, 29 pages. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201780029225.1, Response filed May 25, 2021 to Notification of Paying the Restoration Fee mailed Dec. 22, 2020”, (W/ English Translation of Claims), 24 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201780029225.1, Response filed Sep. 29, 2021 to Office Action mailed Aug. 4, 2021”, with English claims, 23 pages. |
“Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/421,264, filed Jan. 31, 2017”. |
“Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/449,796, filed Mar. 3, 2017”. |
“Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 15/599,372, filed May 18, 2017”. |
“Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/789,845, filed Feb. 13, 2020”. |
“European Application Serial No. 01967968.7, Extended European Search Report mailed Nov. 2, 2009”, 5 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 17764155.2, Extended European Search Report mailed Oct. 2, 2019”, 7 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 17764155.2, Response filed Apr. 28, 2020 to Extended European Search Report mailed Oct. 2, 2019”, 61 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 17783001.5, Extended European Search Report mailed Feb. 3, 2020”, 11 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 17783001.5, Partial Supplementary European Search Report mailed Oct. 31, 2019”, 12 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2001/025409, International Search Report mailed Jan. 14, 2002”, 1 pg. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2012/023390, International Search Report mailed May 23, 2012”, 2 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2012/023390, Written Opinion mailed May 23, 2012”, 6 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2016/027157, International Search Report mailed Jul. 15, 2016”, 2 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2016/027157, Written Opinion mailed Jul. 15, 2016”, 7 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2016/058145, International Search Report mailed Nov. 29, 2016”, 3 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2016/058145, Written Opinion mailed Nov. 29, 2016”, 6 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2017/016002, International Search Report mailed May 16, 2017”, 4 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2017/016002, Written Opinion mailed May 16, 2017”, 6 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2017/021675, International Search Report mailed May 22, 2017”, 2 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2017/021675, Written Opinion mailed May 22, 2017”, 10 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2017/021687, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Sep. 20, 2018”, 8 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2017/021687, International Search Report mailed Aug. 1, 2017”, 4 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2017/021687, Written Opinion mailed Aug. 1, 2017”, 6 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2017/027053, International Search Report mailed Aug. 22, 2017”, 5 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2017/027053, Written Opinion mailed Aug. 22, 2017”, 8 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2018/052696, International Search Report mailed Jan. 24, 2019”, 2 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2018/052696, Written Opinion mailed Jan. 24, 2019”, 4 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2018-547985, Decision of Refusal mailed May 18, 2021”, with English translation, 6 pages. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2018-547985, Notification of Reasons for Refusal mailed Feb. 5, 2021”, (W/ English Translation), 8 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2018-547985, Response filed Apr. 23, 2021 to Notification of Reasons for Refusal mailed Feb. 5, 2021”, (W/ English Translation of Claims), 8 pgs. |
Kim, et al., “Optical feedback signal for ultra short pulse ablation of tissue”, Appl. Surface Sci., (1998), 127-129:857-862. |
Pedowitz, et al., “Arthroscopic surgical tools: a source of metal particles and possible joint damage”, Arthroscopy. 29(9), (2013), 1559-65. |
Tucker, et al., “Histologic characteristics of electrosurgical injuries”, J. Am. Assoc. Gyneco. Laproscopy 4(2), (1997), 857-862. |
Volpato, et al., “Application of Zirconia in Dentistry: Biological, Mechanical and Optical Considerations.”, Advances in ceramics—electric and magnetic ceramics, bioceramics, ceramics and environment, (Sep. 2011), 397-420. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT US2016 058179, International Search Report mailed Mar. 8, 2017”, 4 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT US2016 058179, Written Opinion mailed Mar. 8, 2017”, 7 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201780029225.1, Notification of Paying the Restoration Fee mailed Dec. 22, 2020”, with machine English translation, 2 pages. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201780029225.1, Office Action mailed Jan. 29, 2021”, with English translation, 18 pages. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201780029225.1, Response filed Jan. 20, 2021 to Notification of Paying the Restoration Fee mailed Dec. 22, 2020”, with machine English translation, 4 pages. |
Smith, “Dyonics Bonecutter Electroblade”, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: https: www.smith-nephew.com professional products all-products dyonics-bonecutter-electroblade , (Accessed online Nov. 2, 2021), 2 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220133393 A1 | May 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62308743 | Mar 2016 | US | |
62308705 | Mar 2016 | US | |
62307229 | Mar 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15454690 | Mar 2017 | US |
Child | 17514892 | US |