Article comprising a variable inductor

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6184755
  • Patent Number
    6,184,755
  • Date Filed
    Friday, July 16, 1999
    25 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 6, 2001
    23 years ago
Abstract
A micromechanical variable/tunable inductor is disclosed. The present inductor comprises at least two elements capable of supporting spatial electromagnetic coupling and means for varying a geometrical relationship thereof. Varying the geometrical relationship between such elements varies the inductance of the inductor. In some embodiments, the geometrical relationship that is varied is the spacing between the two elements. The spacing is varied by creating a differential movement between such elements. In further embodiments, the present invention comprises resonant circuits incorporating such variable inductors, and oscillators including such resonant circuits.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates to inductors. More particularly, the present invention relates to a micromechanical variable inductor and circuits for use therewith.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Inductors and variable inductors are useful and/or required circuit elements in a variety of important applications and products. For example, inductors and variable inductors are necessary elements of many RF-wireless products. In particular, they are used for matching and loading low noise amplifiers, power amplifiers and mixers, as well as for providing frequency- selective resonant circuits in variable-frequency oscillators in such RF-wireless products.




In a typical cellular telephone, inductors, and other “passive” components (e.g., capacitors and resistors) may occupy over 90 percent of the circuit-board space, and outnumber active devices by more than ten-to-one. As the functionality of such a telephone continues to be integrated into progressively fewer chips, the passive components that are not easily integrated have come to dominate the board-level design. Thus, it would be desirable to fabricate semiconductor-integrable passive components.




Several difficulties have impeded the development of such semiconductor-integrable passive components. Regarding inductors, important performance parameters for RF applications include the “quality factor,” Q, (i. e., the relative absence of resistive losses) and obtaining a suitably high self-resonant frequency. Unfortunately, a performance improvement in one of such parameters is typically obtained at the expense of the other parameter. For example, increasing the size of an inductor will typically reduce resistive losses, but it will also lower its resonant frequency.




In the prior art, active circuits are typically used to “tune” or vary inductance in integrated circuits. Such an approach has several disadvantages, including degraded phase noise, relatively high power requirements and limited dynamic range.




A prior-art implementation of variable inductor that is described to be useful for silicon-based RF integrated circuit applications has been disclosed by Pehlke, et al in “Extremely High-Q Tunable Inductor for Si-Based RF Integrated Circuit Applications,” 1997 IEEE Int'l Electron Devices Meeting, at 3.4.1-3.4.4., Washington, D.C., Dec. 7-10, 1997. That tunable inductor uses a variable-phase shifter to vary Q and inductance. While reported performance was good, the presence of the phase shifter is undesirable.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




A variable/tunable inductor is disclosed wherein the geometry of the inductor is altered to vary inductance. More particularly, in accordance with the illustrated embodiments and in contrast with the prior art, the present inductors comprise at least two elements that support spatial electromagnetic coupling and means for varying a geometrical relationship thereof. Varying the geometrical relationship between such elements varies the inductance of the inductor.




In one embodiment, a variable inductor in accordance with the present teachings comprises a ground plane, an electrically-conductive planar loop spaced therefrom, and means for varying a geometrical relationship between the ground plane and the loop. In another embodiment, a variable inductor comprises two electrically-conductive planar loops that are spaced from each other and means for varying a geometrical relationship between the two loops.




In the illustrated embodiments, the geometrical relationship that is varied is the spacing between the loop and the ground plane or the spacing between the two loops. In various embodiments, the spacing is varied by creating a differential movement between the relevant elements.




In the illustrated embodiments, such differential movement is generated (1) by restraining the movement of one of the elements or (2) by varying a parameter/property of the two elements such that the elements respond differently to an actuating stimulus. The varied parameter may include, without limitation, element (e.g., loop) thickness, material of fabrication, and structural implementation. In the illustrated embodiments, the actuating stimulus includes temperature, electrostatic force, electromechanical impulsion and magnetic force.




In further embodiments, the present invention comprises resonant circuits incorporating such variable inductors, and oscillators including such resonant circuits.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

depicts a first embodiment of a variable inductor in accordance with the present teachings.





FIG. 2

depicts a second embodiment of a variable inductor in accordance with the present teachings.





FIGS. 3A and 3B

depict a third embodiment of a variable inductor in accordance with the present teachings.





FIGS. 4A-4C

depict a fourth embodiment of a variable inductor in accordance with the present teachings.





FIG. 5

depicts an illustrative arrangement for thermal actuation.





FIG. 6

depicts an illustrative arrangement for electrostatic actuation.





FIG. 7

depicts an illustrative arrangement for electromechanical actuation.





FIGS. 8A-8I

depict an illustrative fabrication method.





FIG. 9

depicts an arrangement for generating a positive mutual inductance term.





FIG. 10

depicts an arrangement for generating a negative mutual inductance term.





FIG. 11

is a conceptual depiction of a one-port negative resistance oscillator in the prior art.





FIG. 12

is a conceptual depiction of a conventional amplifer-based variable-frequency oscillator.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION




The present invention provides a variable inductor, and circuits utilizing same. Such variable inductors are advantageously fabricated on an “integrable” support, such as, without limitation, silicon, germanium and the like. It should be understood, however, that there are applications in which it is desirable to fabricate the present passive variable inductors on a “non-integrable” support, such as glass or other non-conducting or low-dielectric-constant substrates. Applications for non-integrable supports include, for example, “drop in” replacement of existing inductors. The present variable inductors are suitable for use in conjunction with such non-integrable supports, as well as with applications using integrable supports.




Several illustrative resonant circuits in accordance with the present teachings are described later in this Specification after the present variable inductor is described.




The total inductance, L


RF


, of a passive inductor is given by:








L




RF




=L




SELF




+M


  [1]






The two contributions to total inductance include (1) a self inductance term, L


SELF


, and (2) a mutual inductance term, M. The self inductance term derives from the geometry of segments of the inductor. The mutual inductance term derives from the geometry, spatial separation and relative phase of currents carried by different segments comprising the inductor. The impact of such geometric and phase relationships on inductance is well understood. Inductance is varied or “tuned” by changing the self inductance term, or the mutual inductance term, M. In accordance with the present teachings, inductance is changed by varying the geometry/spatial separation of the segments of the inductor.





FIGS. 1-4B

depict several illustrative embodiments of a variable inductor in accordance with the present teachings. In all of such illustrative embodiments, inductance is changed by varying the geometry/spatial separation of various elements or segments of the inductor. It will be understood that the elements or segments must comprise a material that supports spatial electromagnetic coupling. Suitable materials include, without limitation, electrically-conductive materials, magnetic materials that are not electrical conductors (e.g., ferromagnetic glasses), and super conductors.




In the illustrated embodiments, some of the inductive elements that exhibit electromagnetic coupling are referred to as “loops” and depicted as having a “u” shape. It should be understood that such inductive elements can have an arbitrary shape. That is, they need not be loops, need not be “u-” shaped or have any particular shape at all. In fact, in some embodiments, such inductive lines are straight. As used herein, the term “loop,” when referring to elements that exhibit electromagnetic coupling, is meant to indicate an arbitrary geometry, including spirals, loops (including ellipsoidal, circular, rectangular, etc. loops), straight lines and any other suitable configuration.




For clarity of illustration, the means or stimuli by which such geometry is altered (e.g., an actuator, an actuating stimulus) is not depicted in

FIGS. 1-4B

nor described in conjunction therewith. Actuation devices/stimuli are described later in this Specification.




In the embodiment depicted in

FIG. 1

, illustrative variable inductor


100


comprises “loop”


110


, ground plane


104


and support


102


, interrelated as shown. Inductor


100


is configured so that a differential motion can be generated between loop


110


and ground plane


104


. In the illustrated embodiment, loop


110


is “fixed” to support


102


, while ground plane


104


is movable at free end


105


along direction vector


106


but is restrained at fixed end


103


. Since loop


110


is restrained from moving, movement of ground plane


104


causes a differential motion between that loop and the ground plane. A signal, such as an RF signal, is delivered to loop


110


at contacts


116




a


and


116




b.


Support


102


can suitably be semiconductor-integrable, or not, as desired.




The presence of ground plane


104


, which in some embodiments comprises a metal, affects mutual inductance between inductor segments


118


and


119


. As previously noted, the inductance of an inductor, such as inductor


100


, is a function of such spacing, among other factors.




When free end


105


of ground plane


104


is raised off of support


102


(e.g., rotated about fixed end


103


) such that the ground plane is not co-planar with loop


104


, the distance x between ground plane


104


and inductor segments


118


or


119


varies along the direction vector


107


. As such, the mutual inductance term between segments


118


and


119


varies along direction vector


107


.




As ground plane


104


is moved along direction vector


106


, the distance x between the ground plane and any point along inductor segments


118


and


119


changes, increasing or decreasing depending upon the ground plane's direction of motion. As a result of such movement, effective electrical spacing


117


changes, so that self inductance is changed between different segments of loop


110


(e.g., any point along segments


118


and


119


), thereby changing the inductance of inductor


100


.




In an alternate embodiment (not depicted), loop


110


is movable, while ground plane


104


is non movable. In such an embodiment, loop


110


can be fixed to support


102


at anchors, such as anchors


112


and


114


, about which loop


110


can rotate. As described later in this Specification, movement generated in ground plane


104


(or in loops, such as loop


110


) may, as a function of the actuation method, arise from a “warping” of the ground plane (or loop), rather than a true rotation about a fixed end thereof. In this Description and the appended Claims, the terms “movement,” “movable,” “rotation” or the like, when used to describe motion of an unrestrained ground plane or loop, includes warping and/or rotation about a fixed point.




In some embodiments, ground plane


104


comprises a magnetic material, or is otherwise rendered magnetic. Relatively larger changes in inductance can be realized for a given movement along direction vector


106


when ground plane


104


is magnetic.




It will be understood that while loop


110


(and loops shown in other Figures depicting other embodiments) has a single turn, loops having multiple turns may suitably be used in conjunction with the present invention. Additional turns will result in higher values of inductance for the inductor.




A second illustrative embodiment of a variable inductor


200


is depicted in FIG.


2


. Inductor


200


comprises two loops—outer loop


210


and inner loop


220


. Both loops are anchored at anchors


212


,


214


. Loop


210


is movable at free end


211


as indicated by direction vector


216


, and loop


220


is movable at free end


221


as indicated by direction vector


222


. A signal, such as an RF signal, is delivered to loops


210


and


220


at contacts


216




a


and


216




b.






The loops are suitably arranged, actuated, etc., as described later in this Specification, such that a differential motion between loops


210


and


220


can be generated. In other words, the loops move relative to one another such that a change in geometry/spacing results with such movement. As previously described, such a change results in a change in inductance.




Illustrative variable inductor


300


depicted in

FIGS. 3A and 3B

includes two-loops like inductor


200


. Inductor


300


differs from inductor


200


in that outer loop


210


of illustrative inductor


300


is restrained from moving by hooks


302


. Hooks


302


maintain loop


210


in a position relatively near to support


102


. Inductance is varied as unrestrained inner loop


220


is moved upwardly or downwardly.

FIG. 3B

shows inner loop


220


moving downwardly along direction vector


322


towards restrained outer loop


210


. When the inner and outer loops are co-planar, self-inductance is maximized.




Illustrative variable inductor


400


depicted in

FIGS. 4A-4C

also has two-loops. In inductor


400


, outer loop


210


is supported by supports


402


. Members


418


depending from outer loop


210


rest on supports


402


(FIG.


4


B). In such manner, downward motion of loop


210


is substantially prevented. In contrast to inductor


300


, supports


402


raise loop


210


to a position relatively distant from support


102


. Inductance is varied as unrestrained inner loop


220


is moved upwardly or downwardly.

FIG. 4A

depicts the inner and outer loops disposed in co-planar relation.

FIG. 4C

shows inner loop


220


moving downwardly along direction vector


422


away from restrained outer loop


210


.




The present variable inductors utilize a differential motion between inductor segments (or inductor segments and a ground plane) to vary inductance. The manner in which such differential motion is developed is now described.




In one embodiment, a change in temperature can be used as an actuation stimulus. For example, to create such a change in temperature, the inductor can be disposed in a micro-sized oven or a cooler. To generate differential movement between inductor segments, etc., the segments must respond differently to temperature. Such different responses can be achieved, for example, by varying the thickness of the inductor segments, utilizing different metals, and varying the mechanical design, such as by corrugating the surface of one of the segments.




Alternatively, a DC bias can be applied to one of the loops to selectively heat that loop. For example, as depicted in

FIG. 5

, bias is applied to loop


220


, such that loop


220


will be selectively heated.




The movement generated by thermal actuation is typically a “warping” of the loop or ground plane. Such warping is depicted, for the case of fixed inductors, in Gammel et al., “Design, Test and Simulation of Self-Assembled, Micromachined RF Inductors,” Symposium on Design, Test and Microfabrication of MEMS and MOEMS, Paris, France, March-April 1999, reprinted in SPIE vol. 3680 at pp. 582-591.




Inductor


300


depicted in

FIGS. 3A and 3B

, and inductor


400


depicted in

FIGS. 4A-4C

, are well adapted for use in conjunction with thermal actuation. For example, as temperature is reduced, an unrestrained loop tends to “warp,” rising away from support


102


. As temperature increases, the loop lends to assume a planar form.




In another embodiment, the movable member(s) is electrostatically actuated.

FIG. 6

depicts an arrangement for electrostatic actuation wherein electrodes


630


and


632


are disposed beneath the “free end” of loop


210


, and electrodes


640


and


642


are disposed beneath free end of loop


220


. A DC bias is applied to the electrodes generating an electrostatic force that attracts the associated loop. The magnitude of the bias voltage controls the electrostatic force and the amount of movement (i.e., deflection) of the loop.




In a further illustrative embodiment depicted in

FIG. 7

, loops


210


and


220


are electromechanically actuated. In particular, loop


210


is actuated via actuator


758


that mechanically engages that loop via linkage


152




a.


The action of illustrative actuator


758


causes member


759


to move along direction vector


707


in a substantially “horizontal” or “in-plane” motion. Such in-plane movement is converted to a “vertical” lifting or “out-of-plane” motion via the operation of linkage


152




a.


Illustrative linkage


152




a


comprises rigid arm


752


that connects to loop


210


via hinge


754


and connects to actuator


758


via hinge


760


. Loop


220


is similarly actuated via an actuator (not shown for clarity) that is mechanical connected thereto via linkage


752




b.






Actuators suitable for use in conjunction with the present invention include, for example, well known scratch drives, comb drives and any of a variety of other suitable configurations for electromechanical actuation well known in the art.




The present variable inductors can be fabricated with standard micromachining techniques, such as, for example, the multi-user MEMS (micro electromechanical systems) process, “MUMPs” available from MEMS Microelectronics Center of North Carolina (MCNC) in Research Triangle Park, N.C.




One of MCNC's MUMPs technology is a three-polysilicon layer surface micromachining process. That process allows for a first deposited layer, referred to as “POLY0,” that is “non-releasable” and is typically used for patterning address electrodes and local wiring on a support. Thus, the POLY0 layer can be used to form, for example, electrodes


630


,


632


,


640


and


642


(see

FIG. 6

) that are useful for electrostatic actuation of inductor loops. The upper two polysilicon layers, referred to as “POLY1” and “POLY2,” are “releasable” and so can be used to form mechanical structures such as elements of an actuator or movable loops and ground planes. The POLY1 and/or POLY2 layers are released by etching away sacrificial oxide layers that are deposited between the polysilicon layers during fabrication.




The polysilicon layers POLY0, POLY1 and POLY2 have nominal thicknesses of 0.5, 2 and 1.5 microns, respectively. The polysilicon and oxide layers are individually patterned, and unwanted material from each layer is removed by reactive ion etching before the next layer is added. Optionally, a layer of metal, nominally 0.6 to 1.3 microns thick, may be deposited on the POLY2 layer.




MCNC's three-layer process, as well as other MEMS fabrication processes, are now quite familiar to those skilled in the art.




An illustrative method for fabricating an inductor loop, such as illustrative loops


110


,


210


and


220


, based on the MCNC three-layer process is described below and depicted in

FIGS. 8A-8I

. The Figures are depicted as side-views for clarity of illustration, such that only a portion of the structure of the inductor loop (e.g., for inductor


100


, only anchor


114


and segment


119


) is illustrated. Certain layers of material that are deposited when using the MCNC process are not utilized when forming the present structure. To the extent that such unnecessary layers are deposited on the present structure during fabrication, they are completely removed in later lithographic steps. Such non-utilized layers are omitted for clarity of presentation. In the following description and the accompanying Figures, the MCNC designations for the various polysilicon layers will be used.




As depicted in

FIG. 8A

, a first layer POLY0 of polysilicon is deposited on an insulating layer IN, such as silicon nitride. The layer POLY0 is then patterned, using an appropriate mask. The as-patterned layer POLY0


p


, which will function as an “anchor” for one “end” of inductor loop, is shown in FIG.


8


B.




Subsequently, a layer OX of oxide is deposited over the layer IN and the layer POLY0


p


, as depicted in FIG.


8


C. Next, layer OX of oxide is patterned as shown in FIG.


8


D.




In

FIG. 8E

, a layer POLY2 of polysilicon is deposited on the patterned layers OX


p


and POLY0


p


. The inductor loop and supports are formed from the layer POLY2. As such, the layer POLY2 is patterned, using an appropriately configured mask, into such structures. The patterned layer POLY2


p


is depicted in FIG.


8


F.




After patterning the layer POLY2, a layer M of metal is deposited on layer POLY2


p


, and then patterned. The metal is deposited over the supports, as well as the loop, and provides a conductive surface.

FIG. 8G

depicts the patterned layer M on the patterned layer POLY2


p


. Finally, the layer OX of oxide is etched, such as with HF, releasing the patterned layer POLY2


p


, as is depicted in FIG.


8


H.




In some embodiments, two layers of metal, as opposed to a single layer, are deposited everywhere on inductor


102


to reduce electrical resistance as compared to a single layer. In still other embodiments, three or more layers of metal are used to further reduce electrical resistance. Any one of a variety of metals may suitably be used for such purpose, including for example, aluminum, copper, silver or gold. As is known to those skilled in the art, gold is typically not used in conjunction with CMOS processes. As such, in embodiments in which the present variable inductor is to be incorporated into a CMOS chip, the other metals listed above should be used in preference to gold.




In some embodiments, such as for variable inductor


400


, it is desirable to have at least one of the inductor loops elevated above the substrate. One way to do so is to cause patterned layer POLY2


p


to “warp” as it is released, such that the non-anchored end moves upwardly away from the layer IN disposed on the support, as depicted in FIG.


8


I.




Such upward warping can be caused by depositing a “stressed layer” over the structural layer (e.g., the patterned layer POLY2 in the previous example) of the structure that is to be warped. The stressed layer comprises a layer of material that is deposited such that it has a high level of intrinsic stress.




For example, as described above, metal is deposited on the POLY2 layer to provide a conductive surface. That metal is typically gold (for non-CMOS applications). Gold does not, however, adhere well to polysilicon. As such, a thin adhesion layer is often deposited on the POLY2 layer before depositing gold. In one embodiment, the adhesion layer is the stressed layer.




The adhesion layer is advantageously chromium or refractory metals like titanium or tungsten, since a high intrinsic stress is associated with deposited chromium, titanium, tungsten, etc. When the sacrificial oxide layer is etched away to release the patterned layer POLY2


p


, the chromium, etc., layer contracts to minimize strain. Upon such contraction, an upwardly-directed force is imparted to the non-anchored end of patterned layer POLY2


p


, causing it to warp in an “upwards” direction.




In an alternative embodiment (not shown), patterned layer POLY2


p


is fabricated with compressive stress, and an overlying layer (e.g., metal) is deposited with low stress. Upon release, the POLY2


p


layer expands, causing the same upwardly directed warp.




In the aforedescribed illustrative fabrication method, the POLY1 layer of the MCNC process is not used; rather the POLY2 layer is used. There are several reasons for this. First, since the POLY2 layer, at 1.5 microns, is thinner than the POLY1 layer (2 microns), the POLY2 will be more amenable to “warping.” Second, to impart the requisite conductivity to the loop, metal is advantageously deposited on the structural (e.g., polysilicon) layer comprising those structures. In the MCNC process, metal cannot be deposited on the POLY1 layer, but can be deposited on the POLY2 layer.




While the above-described method utilized MCNC's three-polysilicon layer MEMS fabrication technology, it should be understood that inductor loops can be fabricated using other surface micromachining processes.




As previously described, the total inductance, L


RF


, of a passive inductor is given by:








L




RF




=L




SELF




+M,


  [1]






where: L


SELF


is self inductance and M is mutual inductance term.




In a further embodiment, total inductance is influenced by the direction of current flow through the inductor. When parallel currents flow in a concurrent direction in adjacent lines, as illustrated by currents I


210


and I


220


in respective inductor loops


210


and


220


depicted in

FIG. 9

, a positive mutual inductance results. When parallel currents flow in a countercurrent direction in adjacent lines, as illustrated by currents I


310


and I


320


in respective inductor loops


210


and


220


depicted in

FIG. 10

, a negative mutual inductance results.




For countercurrent flow, the two inductor loops


210


and


220


are electrically isolated from one another at at least one end of the loops, such as end


950


in FIG.


10


. At end


950


, loop


210


terminates with electrical contact


916




a


and loop


220


terminates with electrical contact


916




b.


The contacts


916




a


and


916




b


are physically separated.




The variable inductors depicted in

FIGS. 1-4



c


are configured for concurrent flow. It will be appreciated that in other embodiments, the present inductors can be readily configured for countercurrent flow.




By virtue of its small size, and compatibility with CMOS processing, the present variable inductor can advantageously be monolithically integrated into a number of important circuits via commercial-scale processing. At a most basic circuit level, the present variable inductor can be used to provide an improved version of the well-known tunable LC circuit. A tunable LC circuit in accordance with the present teachings comprises a signal generator and a capacitor that are electrically connected to a variable inductor in accordance with the present teachings. Such a circuit may be arranged in either a series or parallel configuration, as is well known in the art.




Such tunable LC circuits are used to provide improved variable-frequency oscillators, filters, and other important circuits in wireless telecommunications and other applications. In one embodiment, the present invention provides a radio-frequency oscillator. In that context, an oscillator is a device or circuit that converts DC power to RF power. Improved oscillators in accordance with the present teachings include the present variable inductor in a variety of well-known configurations.




One such configuration is a one-port negative resistance oscillator, which is conceptually depicted in FIG.


11


. Such an oscillator can be conceptualized as including load L and negative-resistance input device IN. Typically, the negative resistance device is a Gunn or IMPATT diode, which is biased to create a negative resistance. In accordance with the present teachings, the load comprises a resonant structure, such as an LC circuit including the present variable inductor.




Another oscillator configuration implements the function of negative resistance using an amplification device.

FIG. 12

depicts a conventional amplifier-based variable-frequency oscillator. Such an oscillator includes a frequency-dependent or resonant structure RS and an amplification device A. The power output port can be on either side of amplification device A, which is commonly implemented as a transistor.




In an improved amplifier-based variable-frequency oscillator in accordance with the present teachings, resonant structure RS comprises an LC circuit including the present variable inductor. The amplifier is implemented such that it is operable, at an input, to monitor the rf signal in the resonant structure, and is further operable, at an output, to inject an amplified signal into the resonant structure in a manner best suited to sustain oscillations in the resonant structure. Those skilled in the art will be able to design an amplification device suitable for providing the above-described functions.




In some of the embodiments described above, it is advantageous or necessary to integrate methods for making the present variable inductor with CMOS processing. Integrating methods are commercially available, and are generally readily adaptable to meet the needs of a particular application. One such process is the “BiMOSIIe®” process available from Analog Devices, Inc. of Norwood, Mass. The BiMOSIIe® process integrates a surface micromachining process suitable for forming MEMS structures with a CMOS process suitable for forming devices useful for analog applications. Information concerning the BiMOSIIe® process is provided on Analog Devices/MCNC server pages at http://imems.mcnc.org. See also, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,326,726 and 5,620,931 to Tsang et al., incorporated by reference herein.




Additionally, method for monolithically integrating MEMS structure in a CMOS chip are offered by the University of California at Berkeley, and Sandia National Labs of Albuquerque, N. Mex.




It is to be understood that the embodiments described herein are merely illustrative of the many possible specific arrangements that can be devised in application of the principles of the invention. Other arrangements can be devised in accordance with these principles by those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. It is therefore intended that such other arrangements be included within the scope of the following claims and their equivalents.



Claims
  • 1. An article comprising a tunable inductor, the tunable inductor having:a first planar loop comprising a first material that supports spatial electromagnetic coupling; a second element comprising a second material that supports spatial electromagnetic coupling, at least a portion of which second element is spaced from said first loop; and an actuator operable to vary the space between said first loop and said second element.
  • 2. The article of claim 1, wherein said second element is a ground plane.
  • 3. The article of claim 1 wherein:at least a portion of said first planar loop is fixed to a support; at least a portion of said second element is fixed to said support; and at least one of either said first planar loop and said second element is rotatable about the fixed portion thereof.
  • 4. The article of claim 2, wherein said ground plane is magnetic.
  • 5. The article of claim 1, wherein said actuator is operable to move said first loop.
  • 6. The article of claim 5, wherein said second element is a second planar loop.
  • 7. The article of claim 6, wherein said actuator is operable to move said first loop between a first and a second position, wherein:in said first position, said first and second loops are co-planar; and in said second position, said first and second loops are not co-planar.
  • 8. The article of claim 7, wherein said second loop is immovable.
  • 9. The article of claim 6, wherein a direction in which current travels in said first loop is the same direction that current travels in said second loop.
  • 10. The article of claim 6, wherein a direction in which current travels in said first loop is the opposite direction that current travels in said second loop.
  • 11. The article of claim 7, wherein:said first loop comprises a first metal having a first thickness; and said second loop comprises a second metal having a second thickness.
  • 12. The article of claim 11, wherein said first and second thicknesses are different.
  • 13. The article of claim 11, wherein said first and second metals are different.
  • 14. The article of claim 7, wherein said first loop is corrugated.
  • 15. The article of claim 1, wherein said actuator comprises means for applying DC bias to said first loop.
  • 16. The article of claim 1, wherein said actuator comprises means for DC. electrostatic control.
  • 17. The article of claim 1, wherein said actuator comprises a mechanical linkage.
  • 18. The article of claim 17, wherein said actuator further comprises an electromechanical device that is operatively connected, via said mechanical linkage, to said first loop.
  • 19. The article of claim 1, wherein said article comprises a LC circuit having a signal generator and a capacitor that is electrically connected to said tunable inductor.
  • 20. The article of claim 19, wherein the article comprises a variable-frequency oscillator, said variable-frequency oscillator including a negative-resistance device that is electrically connected to a resonant structure comprising said LC circuit.
  • 21. An article comprising:a first planar loop suitable for supporting spatial electromagnetic coupling, wherein a first portion of said first loop is attached to a substrate; a second element suitable for supporting spatial electromagnetic coupling, wherein said second element is spaced from said first planar loop, and further wherein a first portion of said second element is attached to said substrate; and an actuator operable to vary the space between said first loop and said second element.
  • 22. An article comprising:a first element suitable for supporting spatial electromagnetic coupling; a second element suitable for supporting spatial electromagnetic coupling; and an actuator operable to vary a spacing between said first and second elements; wherein: said first element and said second element are suitably disposed relative to one another to support spatial electromagnetic coupling therebetween; and at least one of said first element and said second element is rotatable about a fixed end thereof.
  • 23. An article comprising:a first planar loop suitable for supporting spatial electromagnetic coupling, wherein a first portion of said first loop is attached to a substrate; a second element suitable for supporting spatial electromagnetic coupling, wherein: said second element is spaced from said first planar loop; said second element is not parallel with respect to said first planar loop; and a first portion of said second element is attached to said substrate; and an actuator operable to vary the space between said first loop and said second element.
STATEMENT OF RELATED CASES

The present case is related to the following U.S. patent applications Ser. Nos. 09/152,185 and 09/152,189, both of which were filed Sep. 12, 1998.

US Referenced Citations (6)
Number Name Date Kind
1608993 Pfanstiehl et al. Jan 1926
1861869 Long Jun 1932
1961783 Roder Jun 1934
2308863 Craymer Jan 1943
2448642 Wilburn Sep 1948
2685070 Childs Jul 1954
Non-Patent Literature Citations (5)
Entry
Gammel et al. “Design, Test and Simulation of Self-Assembled, Micromachined RF Inductors,” SPIE vol. 3680, pp. 581-591, Part of the Symposium on Design, Test and Microfabrication of MEMS and MOEMS, Mar.-Apr. 1999, Paris, France.
Young et al. “A Low-Noise RF Voltage-Controlled Oscillator Using On-Chip High-Q Three-Dimensional Coil Inductor and Micromachined Variable Capacitor,” Tech. Dig., pp. 128-131, Solid State Sensor and Actuator Workshop, Jun. 8-11, 1998, Hilton Head Island, South Carolina.
Fan et al., “Universal MEMS Platforms for Passive RF Components: Suspended Inductors and Variable Capacitors,” IEEE Proc., pp. 29-33, Eleventh Annual Int'l. Conf. MEMS, Jan. 25-29, 1998, Heidelberg, Germany.
“MEMS Technology Pursued for the Development of Micromachined Silicon Variable Inductors and Latching Accelerometers,” Elec. Design, Jun. 23, 1997.
Pehlke et al., “Extremely High-Q Tunable Inductor for Si-Based RF Integrated Circuit Applications,” IEEE Proc., pp. 63-66, Int'l. Electron Devices Meeting, Dec. 7-10, 1997, Washington, D.C.