This invention relates generally to fluid control devices such as valves. More specifically, the invention relates to valve assemblies for internal combustion engines. Most specifically, the invention relates to fuel injector components having hard, lubricious coatings deposited thereupon.
In operation, many components of internal combustion engines are exposed to extremes of temperature and pressure as well as to corrosive environments. Furthermore, such components often operate at very high repetition rates. Fluid control devices of internal combustion engines, such as fuel injector valves, intake valves and exhaust valves, are also required to maintain their dimensional tolerances under such extreme conditions. The prior art has long sought methods, materials and techniques for enhancing the durability and service life of internal combustion engines and their respective components. Toward this end, various components of the engines have been coated with protective materials.
Any such coating should function to protect engine components from extreme operating conditions. In addition, the coatings should decrease friction and/or be wear resistant. In addition, any such coatings should be easy and economical to apply in a high volume production process. The prior art has heretofore encountered problems in implementing such coatings since many of the desired criteria are mutually exclusive. For example, ceramic coatings are very hard and chemically inert; however, such coatings tend to be abrasive, and they are often brittle. Diamond-like carbon coatings have also been investigated for use in internal combustion engines. Such coatings also tend to be brittle; furthermore, scale up of processes for preparing such coatings has been found to be difficult.
Disclosed in the prior art are a number of coatings which have been proposed for use in fluid control systems of internal combustion engines. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,783,261 discloses a fuel injector valve which is coated with amorphous carbon that is implanted with a carbide forming material such as silicon, titanium or tungsten. PCT publication WO 01/61182 discloses a fuel injector needle having a coating of diamond-like carbon which contains large amounts of metal carbides. U.S. Pat. No. 5,237,967 discloses a valve lifter coated with an amorphous carbon film including 30-50 atomic percent of hydrogen therein. Similar teachings are found in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,771,873 and 5,249,554. Ceramic coatings for fuel injector components are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,309,874 and 6,267,307.
Despite the various attempts implemented in the prior art, there has heretofore been no satisfactory coating for use in fluid control devices of internal combustion engines. As will be explained hereinbelow, the present invention provides a hard, lubricious, chemically inert coating for internal combustion engine components. The coating of the present invention is wear resistant, yet it is durable under conditions of repeated mechanical shock. The coatings of the present invention can be deposited by high volume, easy to control sputtering techniques, and have been demonstrated to significantly increase the service life of engine components. These and other advantages of the invention will be apparent from the drawings, discussion and description which follow.
There is disclosed herein a valving assembly for a fuel injector. The assembly includes a valve member and a seat member which are selectably engageable so as to control the flow of fuel therebetween. At least a portion of at least one of the valve member and the seat member is coated with a graphitic carbon coating. In particular embodiments, the graphitic coating further includes a metal, which may be present in an amount of 0.5-10 atomic percent. In preferred embodiments, the metal is a transition metal, and in a specifically preferred embodiment it is a group VIa transition metal. One preferred transition metal is chromium.
The coatings of the present invention preferably have low contents of hydrogen, carbides and tetrahedral carbon.
In particular embodiments, the graphitic coating is deposited by a sputtering process, and a specific, preferred process is unbalanced magnetron sputtering.
In accord with the principles of the present invention, various components of an internal combustion engine are coated with a hard, inert, lubricious coating of carbon which is characterized as “graphitic.” This coating protects the components from corrosive conditions encountered in the engine. In addition, the hard and lubricious nature of the coating decreases wear of the components and frictional losses in the engine, which are particularly significant issues when engines are fueled with alcohol/gasoline mixtures or when the fuel contains water. The graphitic coating is resilient and hence resistant to cracking or other mechanical failure occasioned by repetitive and/or high impact forces encountered in the operation of the engine. Fluid control devices such as components of fuel injectors, intake valves, exhaust valves and the like benefit significantly from the graphitic carbon coatings of the present invention.
Graphitic carbon is known in the art as being a distinct form of deposited carbon, and it may be prepared by a variety of techniques including physical vapor deposition techniques such as sputtering, evaporation, laser ablation, electron beam evaporation and variants thereof. While the prior art acknowledges graphitic carbon as being distinct from amorphous carbon and diamond-like (tetrahedral) carbon, the prior art has not heretofore employed graphitic carbon as a wear resistant, lubricious, protective coating for components of an internal combustion engine; and in fact, the prior art explicitly teaches away from such utility. In this regard, see U.S. Pat. No. 5,237,967.
Graphitic carbon includes a very high proportion of carbon in the sp2 form and a very low proportion of carbon in the sp3, tetrahedral, form. Graphitic carbon, as opposed to amorphous carbon, is essentially non-hydrogenated, and while graphitic carbon coatings may include some small proportion of hydrogen, depending upon the method by which these materials are prepared, any such hydrogen is present in an amount sufficiently low so that the inherent properties of the graphitic carbon are not significantly modified. In this regard, graphitic carbon films are essentially non-hydrogenated, although it is to be understood that such films may include Up to 10 atomic percent hydrogen therein and still be considered graphitic. Graphitic carbon coatings have been found to retain their inherent physical and structural properties in the presence of high levels of moisture. This is in contrast to other non-graphitic carbon coatings, and is believed to be due to their essentially non-hydrogenated nature.
The graphitic carbon coatings employed in the present invention preferably include a metal therein, and this metal is most preferably a transition metal. It is to be understood that transition metals comprise those metals found in groups IIIa-IIb of the periodic table. Since there are presently several conventions for specifying the identity of the a and b groups of the periodic table, it is to be understood that within the context of this disclosure, group IIIa elements are the scandium group elements, and group IIb elements are the zinc group elements, with the remaining groups of the periodic table corresponding to this convention. Some specifically preferred transition metals comprise the group Va-VIIa metals, with the group VIa metals being a specific, preferred group. One preferred transition metal for use in the graphitic films of the present invention comprises chromium. Typically, the metal component of the graphitic carbon coating will be present in the range of 0.5-10 atomic percent, and in some specific embodiments, the metal will comprise 1-4 atomic percent of the coating. The metal component of the coating may comprise a single metal, or it may comprise two or more metals.
It is a notable feature of the coatings employed in the present invention that the carbide content thereof is very low. The metal is primarily non-carbided. In a typical coating of the present invention, the carbide content of the film is less than 0.5 atomic percent.
The graphitic carbon coatings have been found to be particularly advantageous for use in connection with fuel injectors, and the invention will be further explained with reference to fuel injectors; although it is to be understood that the invention is not limited thereto and includes, among other things, other coated valve assemblies such as exhaust and intake valves, fuel and air metering valves, as well as other components of internal combustion engines such as pistons, piston rings, cylinders, bearing surfaces, or any other components which undergo sliding friction in a corrosive and/or high temperature environment. Fuel injectors are of many different designs, but all basically include a valve and seat arrangement wherein a valve member and a seat member are selectably engageable to open and close a fuel flow path defined therebetween. The valve and seat member are required to open and close for every power stroke of their associated piston, and they are exposed to corrosive effects of fuel, high temperatures, and repetitive mechanical stress and impact as well as variations in sliding friction due to the operating environment.
Referring now to
Referring now to
In accord with the present invention, a graphitic carbon coating is applied to the armature 14. The coating is applied to the surface of the armature which seals against the valve member 18, and is most preferably applied to substantially all of the surface of the armature. Use of the coating increases the service life of the fuel injector by protecting the armature and valve face from wear and corrosion, while providing a very good sealing surface for the valve member.
Referring now to
While the
A typical coating of the type shown in
While the coatings of the present invention may be prepared by a variety of deposition processes, physical vapor deposition processes may be employed with particular advantage. Sputtering processes comprise one particularly preferred group of physical vapor deposition processes since they are easy to control and readily scalable to accommodate large volumes. In general, non-reactive sputtering processes are employed. Magnetron sputtering processes are one class of specifically preferred process, and unbalanced magnetron sputtering is employed with advantage in particular embodiments of the invention. Unbalanced magnetron sputtering techniques and apparatus are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,557,519, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Referring now to
The apparatus of
The present invention will be described with reference to a particular coating process carried out by an unbalanced magnetron sputtering technique utilizing an apparatus as generally described hereinabove for coating a graphitic carbon coating onto armatures of the type generally shown in FIG. 2. Prior to the coating process, the armatures are cleaned in a caustic detergent solution (Chem Crest 275 at a 10% concentration). Cleaning was carried out in an ultrasonic washer at 160° F. for 5 minutes following which the parts were rinsed with a 2% rust inhibitor solution (Chem Crest 77) at 120° F. for 5 minutes, following which they were spray rinsed with deionized water at 120° F. for 30 seconds. The parts were then again treated with the rust inhibitor and re-rinsed with deionized water as above. The parts were then dried in a stream of filtered hot air at 250° F. for 5 minutes. Alternatively, the parts may be cleaned using a non-aqueous, non-aromatic solvent, such as the product sold under the name Lotoxane® by AIM Inc. of Montreal, Canada.
Approximately 4,000 of the cleaned armature parts were placed on a carousel type support and loaded into an apparatus of the type shown in FIG. 4. The system was pumped down and flushed with argon, and the working pressure therein was adjusted to 0.6 mTorr. In a first step of the process, the substrates were plasma cleaned. This was accomplished by imposing a bias of approximately −400 volts on the substrate holder. The biasing voltage had a base frequency of 250 kHz, and it was pulsed at an on-off rate of 500 nanoseconds. The magnetrons employed in this coating process had a length of approximately 27 inches, and a current of 0.4 amp was established through the chromium targets, and a current of 0.2 amp was established through the carbon targets. This current and voltage condition did not produce any significant deposition onto the armatures; but, produced an ion bombardment which served to clean the armatures. This cleaning step was carried out for approximately 30 minutes.
Following the cleaning step, the chromium bonding layer was deposited. This was accomplished by setting the bias voltage to −120 volts and increasing the current flow to the chromium target to 4 amps. No current flowed through the other chromium target or through either of the carbon targets. This deposition was carried out for approximately 12 minutes, after which the graded composition transition zone was prepared. In this regard, the bias voltage was decreased to −60 volts, and the frequency of the biasing voltage was lowered to 50 kHz and the on-off cycle time was increased to 1500 ns. The background working pressure of 0.6 mTorr of argon was maintained throughout the entire process. The deposition of the transition zone occurred over approximately 30 minutes, and during this time, the current flow through the chromium target was lowered from an initial current of 4.0 amps to a final current of 0.25 amps. During this same time, the current through each of the carbon targets was ramped up from 0.25 amps to 3.0 amps.
Following the deposition of the transition zone, the graphitic coating was deposited. In this regard, all conditions were maintained as they were at the end of the deposition of the transition zone. That is to say, current through the carbon targets was maintained at 3.0 amps, and current through the one chromium target was maintained at 0.25 amp. This coating step was carried out for 180 minutes. This process produced a coating of approximately 2.5 microns thickness, and the coating had properties as described above.
The wear performance of this coating was measured on a CSEM high temperature tribometer by applying a 15 N (1.5 kg) load to a 6 mm diameter tungsten carbide ball at a rotational speed of 500 rpm. The wear track for the testing was 7 mm in diameter. Several runs were made, and each sample was run for 1-2 hours and the wear rate calculated. Even after 2 hours under these conditions, only a small amount of coating wear was apparent. The wear rate as measured was in the range of 5-9×10−17 m2/N.
A second coating run was carried out under conditions basically as described with regard to the first run. Generally higher target currents were maintained. Specifically, during the ion cleaning step current through the two chromium targets was maintained at 1.0 amp, and current through the two carbon targets at 0.5 amp. During this run, the chromium deposition was carried out at a chromium target current of 6.0 amp, and in the deposition of the transition zone, current through the chromium target ramped down over 30 minutes from 6.0 amp to 0.25 amp, while current through the two carbon targets ramped up from 0.25 to 6.0 amp. During the deposition of the graphitic coating, current through the chromium target was maintained at 0.6 amp, and current through the two carbon targets at 6.0 amp. All other parameters of the process were maintained as in the first run. This process produced a coating having a surface roughness of 0.02 microns, a Vickers hardness of 1215, a modulus of elasticity of 167 GPa, a coefficient of friction of 0.08-0.10, and a wear rate, calculated as previously, of 3×10−16 m2/N.
It has been found that armatures coated with the graphitic coating of the present invention exhibit very long service life, and typically maintain precise tolerances so that the dynamic flow shift of fuel therethrough varies by less than 5% over 600 million operational cycles. Current predictions based upon work in progress indicate that this variance will drop to 3% or below in the near future. The sputtering process is reliable, repeatable, and simple to control. Furthermore, the parameters of the process can be readily scaled to accommodate large batches.
The foregoing examples have described coatings of graphitic carbon which include chromium. It is to be understood that the coatings used in the present invention are not so limited. For example, one of skill in the art will recognize that other metals, such as vanadium, molybdenum and tungsten, may be readily substituted for chromium. Furthermore, metal free, graphitic films can also be used in the practice of this invention.
It is to be noted that while the invention has been described with reference to a specific configuration of fuel injector valve component, the invention is not to be limited thereto. Fuel injectors of other configurations may be likewise incorporated into the present invention as may be other fluid control components of internal combustion engines such as intake valves, exhaust valves, carburetor parts and the like. The invention has applicability wherever a low friction, durable and inert surface is required. This invention has broad utility in the general field of gas and liquid flow control devices, including injection valves for natural gas, propane and hydrogen powered devices, as well as for devices used in compressors and the like.
Also, while the preferred magnetron sputtering process for the preparation of the coatings used in the present invention has been described, the invention is not to be limited to coatings produced by this process. Other coating processes, including other physical vapor deposition processes, may be readily implemented by one of skill in the art. Accordingly, the foregoing drawings, discussion and description are meant to be illustrative of the present invention, but are not meant to be limitations upon the practice thereof. It is the following claims, including all equivalents, which define the scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4269391 | Saito et al. | May 1981 | A |
4811701 | Buhl et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4873150 | Doi et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4974498 | Lemelson | Dec 1990 | A |
5237967 | Willermet et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5249554 | Tamor et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5309874 | Willermet et al. | May 1994 | A |
5458927 | Malaczynski et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5556519 | Teer | Sep 1996 | A |
5692723 | Baxter et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5771873 | Potter et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5783261 | Potter et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5979866 | Baxter et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6062498 | Klopfer | May 2000 | A |
6145763 | Fleming et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6165616 | Lemelson et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6244525 | Gallup et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6267307 | Pontoppidan | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6679231 | Kabat et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6715693 | Dam et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 0161182 | Aug 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040129313 A1 | Jul 2004 | US |