The present embodiments relate to an article of footwear, and in particular to an article of footwear that provides dynamic support and stability as the wearer engages in a particular athletic or recreational activity
Typical athletic shoes have two major components, an upper that provides the enclosure for receiving the foot, and a sole secured to the upper. The upper is generally adjustable using laces or other fastening means to secure the shoe properly to the foot, and the sole has the primary contact with the playing surface. The primary functions of the upper are to provide protection, stability and support to the wearers foot tailored to the particular activity the wearer is engaged in, while maintaining an appropriate level of comfort.
This summary is intended to provide an overview of the subject matter of the present embodiments, and is not intended to identify essential features or key elements of the subject matter, nor is it intended to be used to determine the scope of the claimed embodiments. The proper scope of the embodiments may be ascertained from the detailed description of the embodiments provided below, the figures referenced therein, and the claims.
Generally, the embodiments of the articles of footwear with a dynamic support system disclosed herein have regions or portions of the footwear whose flexibility, level of support, stiffness and/or impact resistance can be controlled by activating the dynamic support system in response to input from one or more sensors. As described below, the sensors may be placed in various positions of the article of footwear, depending upon the specific sports or recreational activity the article of footwear is intended for, or could be placed on wrist bands, headbands, shorts, shirts or other articles of apparel worn by a user. For example, the article of footwear may be a walking shoe, tennis shoe, a running shoe, a training shoe, a soccer shoe, a football shoe, a basketball shoe, an all-purpose recreational sneaker, a volleyball shoe or a hiking boot.
In one aspect, the dynamic support system in the article of footwear has at least one sensor in communication with a microprocessor. The sensor is embedded in either the sole or the upper of the article of footwear. It also has an array of tiles embedded in the upper with at least one cable laced through the array of tiles and wound around a reel. It has a reversible motor attached to the reel such that the reversible motor can rotate the reel in a first direction to pull in the cable to compress the array of tiles and in a second direction opposite to the first direction to loosen the array of tiles. The microprocessor is in communication with the reversible motor and can activate the reversible motor to rotate the reel in the first direction or in a the second direction according to an algorithm that receives input(s) from the sensor(s) and, in response to the input(s), determines whether to rotate the reel in the first direction to pull in the cable to compress the array of tiles or to rotate the reel in the second direction to loosen the array of tiles.
In another aspect, the dynamic support system includes an array of tiles embedded in a fabric portion of the upper and a microprocessor. It also has stress sensors such as pressure sensor(s) in the sole reporting to the microprocessor and/or tension sensor(s) in the upper reporting to the microprocessor. It has cables laced through the array of tiles and mechanically connected to a reel attached to a reversible motor. When the microprocessor receives input from a sensor, it can control the reversible motor to rotate the reel to compress the array of tiles according to input(s) received from that sensor.
In another aspect, the dynamic support system uses microprocessors and sensors embedded in both a left article of footwear and a right article of footwear. The sensors in both the left article of footwear and the right article of footwear communicate with both the microprocessor in the left article of footwear and the microprocessor in the right article of footwear. Each article of footwear also has a reversible motor in communication with its microprocessor. Each reversible motor can rotate an attached reel. Each article of footwear has an array of tiles in its upper that is mechanically connected to the its reel by a cable system. The microprocessors are configured to receive inputs from both the first pressure sensor and the second pressure sensor, and to respond to these inputs by activating their respective motors to compress the arrays of tiles.
In another aspect, a dynamic support system for an article of footwear has at least one sensor located in the article of footwear and at least one other sensor located in an article (other than the article of footwear) that is worn by a wearer of the article of footwear. A microprocessor in the article of footwear is in communication with both sensors over a personal area wireless network. When the microprocessor receives an input from a sensor located in the article of footwear and another input from a sensor located in the article worn by the wearer of the article of footwear, it responds to these inputs by determining whether to activate a motor to compress an array of tiles in a fabric portion of the article of footwear
In another aspect, an article of footwear has a plurality of diamond-shaped tiles arranged in an array of rows and columns. It has a first set of cables laced diagonally through the diamond-shaped tiles from one vertex to an opposite vertex of the diamond shaped tiles in one of (a) alternate rows of the array of rows and columns and (b) alternate columns in the array of rows and columns. The first set of cables is mechanically connected to a first reel attached to a first reversible motor. It has a stress sensor in one of the upper and the sole that is in communication with a microprocessor. The microprocessor is configured to control the first reversible motor to compress the tiles when it receives an input from the sensor indicating that a detected stress level is above a predetermined stress level.
The following U.S. patent applications disclose sensor systems for use in articles of footwear, and are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety: U.S. Patent Applications Pub. Nos. US 2012/0291564; US 2012/0291563; US 2010/0063778; US 2013/0213144; US 2013/021347; and US 2012/0251079.
Other systems, methods, features and advantages of the invention will be, or will become, apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art upon examination of the following figures and detailed description. It is intended that all such additional systems, methods, features and advantages be included within this description and this summary, be within the scope of the invention, and be protected by the following claims.
The embodiments can be better understood with reference to the following drawings and description. The components in the figures are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating the principles of the embodiments. Moreover, in the figures, like reference numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the different views.
Generally, this application discloses articles of footwear bearing a dynamic support system. The dynamic support system adjusts the level of support and flexibility of various portions of the article of footwear dynamically, so as to provide additional support, stability and protection when the dynamic support system determines that such additional support, protection and stability is needed, and to maintain a flexible configuration when such additional support, protection or stability is not needed. The dynamic support system may react in response to an actual event, such as a player stressing a particular region of the article of footwear, or may be activated in anticipation of a stress in a particular region of the article of footwear.
An example of an embodiment of a dynamic support system is shown as an array 150 of tiles 151. The array 150 of tiles 151 is shown on the lateral side of the article of footwear, between the eyelets 118 and the sole 101 of the article of footwear. The dynamic support system includes additional components, such as cables and one or more harnesses, reels, motors, sensors, microprocessors and programs. These are described below in reference to certain of the figures below.
In some embodiments, array 150 of tiles 151 may be covered by an outer layer of fabric 160, as shown in the blow-up of a cross-section of the upper in
Upper 110 may be generally fabricated from materials such as fabric, leather, woven or knitted materials, mesh, thermoplastic polyurethane, or other suitable materials, or from combinations of these materials. In some embodiments, upper 110 may also have reinforcing strips or panels in certain portions of the upper, such as around the ankle opening, at the eyelets or in the front of the toe region. For convenience, the upper material and layers of the upper material are referred to generically in this specification as a “fabric,” but the term should be understood to encompass any material that may be used to fabricate the upper or any portion of the upper.
As the wearer of the article of footwear engages in athletic or recreational activities, the wearer may put stress on his or her forefoot, instep, ankle, heel, or on the medial or lateral sides of the footwear, for example. During those instants when a part of the wearer's foot is under stress, increased support may be beneficial in a corresponding portion of the footwear. At the same time, the flexibility of other portions of the footwear may be maintained. When the foot is no longer under significant stress, for example when the wearer is sitting, standing or walking, the dynamic support system may relax back to its initial unstressed condition.
Various kinds of stress sensors may be used with a dynamic support system. For example, in some embodiments, the dynamic support system may use piezoelectric sensors as pressure sensors in the sole of the article of footwear. In some embodiments it may also use strain gauge sensors to measure the tension in the fabric of the upper. It may also use proximity sensors to detect an impending impact, or accelerometers to detect certain motions by the person wearing the articles of footwear.
For purposes of illustration,
As discussed in further detail below, the dynamic support system uses an array of tiles embedded in or on the material of upper 110. The tiles are connected by a series of cables to one or more reels or spools that may be rotated by one or more reversible motors positioned in, for example, the back of the heel 112, the sole 101 or on the sides of the footwear. The motors are controlled by one or more microprocessors placed, for example, in the sole 101 or in the back of the heel 112, as described below. The microprocessor is in wired or wireless communication with sensors positioned, for example, in the sole or in the upper, or even elsewhere on or around the wearer's body, as described below. In some embodiments, the tiles and the cables may be held in place between an outer layer of fabric and an inner layer of fabric.
Horizontal cables 204 are gathered in a harness 270, which is attached to horizontal end cable 272. End cable 272 winds around reel 273. Reel 273 can be rotated in one direction by reversible motor 274 to pull row of tiles 211, row of tiles 212, row of tiles 213, row of tiles 214 and row of tiles 215 to compress the array of tiles. Reel 273 can be rotated in the opposite direction by reversible motor 274 to relax the tension on harness 270 and on horizontal cables 204 and allow the tiles to move back to their initial positions.
In the same way, vertical cables 202 are gathered in a harness 271, which is attached to vertical end cable 275. End cable 275 winds around reel 276. Reel 276 can be rotated in one direction by reversible motor 277 to pull row of tiles 221, row of tiles 222, row of tiles 223, row of tiles 224 and row of tiles 225 to compress the array of tiles. Reel 276 can be rotated in the opposite direction by reversible motor 277 to relax the tension on harness 271 and on vertical cables 202 and allow the tiles to move back to their initial positions.
As described below with reference to succeeding figures, when vertical cables 202 are pulled from the bottom, top row 211 of tiles is pulled down so that it abuts the next row 212 of tiles. As vertical cables 202 are pulled down further, row 212 of tiles abut row 213 of tiles. As vertical cables 202 are pulled down even further, row 213 of tiles abuts row 214 of tiles, then row 214 is pulled down so that it abuts row 215 of tiles. Row 215 of tiles may be fixed so that row 214 may be pulled against row 215 without further movement. In this manner, array of tiles 200 may be compressed vertically, thus providing increased stiffness, stability, support and impact protection.
In the same way, when horizontal cables 204 are pulled to the right, leftmost column of tiles 221 is pulled against column 222 of tiles, which is pulled against column 223 of tiles, which is pulled against column 224 of tiles, which is pulled against column 225 of tiles. Column 225 of tiles may be fixed so that column 224 may be pulled against column 225 without further movement. In this manner, array of tiles 200 may be compressed horizontally, thus providing increased stiffness, stability, support and impact protection.
In some embodiments, to provide maximum stability, both vertical cables 202 and horizontal cables 204 may be pulled by their respective reversible motors 274 and 277 to compress tiles 201 both horizontally and vertically.
Although the tiles are shown in
It should be understood that in other embodiments, alternative arrangements of associating cables and tiles could be used. For example, in some alternative embodiments, one or more cables could pass between a tile and a fabric, rather than passing through channels in the tile.
In this example, the motor and reel may be located at the back of the heel of upper 110. Cables 204 are attached to a harness such as harness 270 shown in
The array of tiles shown in
In this example, motor 277 and reel 276 may be located in the sole. Cables 202 and harness 271 may be routed between fabric layers 230 and 231 (shown in
The array of
In the embodiment of
As shown in
The preceding paragraphs and the figures described in those paragraphs describe the mechanical part of the dynamic support system, including the arrays of tiles, the cables, harnesses, the reels and the motors. The following paragraphs and figures describe the sensors which are used to detect certain actions and events and the algorithms used to control the motors which in turn control the configurations of the arrays of tiles.
In different embodiments, the locations of one or more sensors may vary. The sensors may be placed in various positions in the sole or in the upper, or may be worn by the wearer on his or her garments or on wrist bands, head bands, ankle wraps or knee pads, for example. The sensors may respond to pressure, tension, or acceleration.
Microprocessor 630 and the motors it controls may be powered by a single battery, such as battery 650 shown in
When microprocessor 630 determines that pressure sensor 625 has detected a pressure exerted by the big toe against the sole that exceeds a predetermined threshold for pressure sensor 625, it may then activate a motor (such as motor 474 shown in
Some embodiments may include various other kinds of sensors that detect, for example, contact (or impending contact with), an object such as a ball or another object. As an example, the embodiment of
Microprocessor 730 is shown in
Battery 750 may be used to provide power to each of the motors that activate the cables that pull the tiles together. Alternatively, separate batteries may be used for the microprocessor and for the motors. For example, each microprocessor could have its own battery and each motor could have its own battery.
In addition, these sensors may communicate with microprocessors (not shown) that control other systems or devices in the articles worn by the athlete. For example, the sensors may be used to activate dynamic support systems (not shown) that are associated with a knee pad, head band, wrist band, or ankle wrap, in addition to communicating with microprocessors in the footwear, Thus, for example, sensor 824 may detect information used to tighten a dynamic support system (not shown) within the associated knee pad,
Microprocessor 903 is powered by battery 951. It has an associated antenna 953. Microprocessor 904 is powered by battery 950. It has an associated antenna 952. Microprocessor 903 and microprocessor 904 can communicate with each other wirelessly using, for example, ANT+ wireless technology, via antenna 952 and antenna 953. In this example, sensor 910, sensor 907 and sensor 905 are in electrical communication with microprocessor 903 via electrical wires 960 and sensor 908, and sensor 909 and sensor 906 are in electrical communication with microprocessor 904 via electrical wires 961.
Once the microprocessor has been activated by turning it on or by inserting a battery, the wearer may set the sensors to zero by standing flat-footed on the playing surface for a predetermined time, for example three to five seconds. This is shown as step 1001 in the algorithm of
In this example, the selected sensor could be sensor 625 shown in
Next, in step 1003, the microprocessor determines if the pressure recorded by the sensor is above a predetermined level. In some cases, the predetermined level of pressure may be pre-programmed into the microprocessor, while in other cases the predetermined level could be determined by previously sensed information.
If the reported pressure is above the predetermined level (e.g., above the threshold pressure), in step 1004 the microprocessor activates the motor controlling the tiles in a region associated with the selected sensor to compress the tiles in that region.
If the pressure on the selected sensor was not above the predetermined level in step 1003, the microprocessor proceeds to step 1005 to select a new sensor. At this point, the microprocessor returns to step 1003 to determine whether the pressure reading at the new sensor is above a predetermined level. Thus, it may be seen that the microprocessor can cycle through checking different sensors to determine if dynamic support (in the form of compressing an array of tiles) should be provided at a region associated with the sensor. Likewise, after step 1004, during which compression of tiles is applied at a specific region of the article, the microprocessor may proceed to step 1005 to select a new sensor and repeat the process.
Thus, this exemplary process depicts a situation where a single microprocessor cycles through checks of various sensors in the article to determine if one or more regions should be supported via compression of tiles. However, it should be understood that in other embodiments two or more microprocessors can be configured to simultaneously check on the status of at least two different sensors, rather that utilizing a single microprocessor to check the status of each sensor in sequence.
In step 1052, the microprocessor determines the pressure at a first sensor and simultaneously determines the pressure at a second sensor that is different from the first sensor. As an example, the first sensor could be associated with the lateral side of the article while the second sensor could be associated with the medial side of the article. Next, in step 1053, the microprocessor determines if there is a pressure differential between the first sensor and the second sensor. In particular, the microprocessor may determine if the differential is above a predetermined level. If so, the microprocessor proceeds to step 1054. Otherwise, the microprocessor may proceed back to step 1052 to determine the pressures at the two sensors again, or possibly at a different pair of sensors.
At step 1054, the microprocessor determines if the pressure at the first sensor is greater than the pressure at the second sensor. If so, the microprocessor proceeds to step 1056 to compress tiles in the region associated with the first sensor. Otherwise, the microprocessor proceeds to step 1055 to compress tiles in the region associated with the second sensor. Thus, if at step 1054 the microprocessor determines that the pressure detected at the lateral side of the foot (detected by the first sensor) is greater than the pressure detected at the medial side of the foot (detected by the second sensor), then the microprocessor controls the array of tiles on the lateral side of the foot to compress, Such an action may increase support on the lateral side of the foot as the user applies makes cutting moves in the lateral direction.
Although not shown in the exemplary processes, some embodiments could include steps of determining if all the sensors of an article report negative pressures, which would indicate pressures below the zero levels set at the beginning of operation (e.g., in step 1001 of
Microprocessor 630 may execute several algorithms such as the algorithms shown in
If the tension on the selected tension sensor is above the predetermined level for that sensor, the microprocessor goes on to step 1104, where it checks whether the pressure reported by a sensor in the sole that is associated with the selected tension sensor is above a predetermined level for that pressure sensor. For example, if the selected tension sensor is sensor 724 shown in
If the pressure in the associated pressure sensor is not above the predetermined level for that sensor, then the microprocessor goes on to step 1106, where it can select a new tension sensor, and continue with the algorithm.
An algorithm such as the one shown in
In some embodiments, for certain tension sensors in the upper, the algorithm may not need to check with an associated pressure sensor in the sole. For those tension sensors, their associated region in the upper may be compressed without checking whether the pressure reported by an associated pressure sensor is above a predetermined level. Those tension sensors would then report to an algorithm that would only include steps such as step 1101, step 1102, step 1103, step 1105 and step 1106 in
Thus the algorithm of
Thus in step 1301, the sensors in both soles are zeroed-out with the athlete or recreational wearer standing on the playing surface or on the ground. In step 1302, if a microprocessor such as microprocessor 904 in the right sole determines that the pressure detected by a sensor such as sensor 909 in
As noted above, the delays in compressing regions in the left or right uppers may be adjustable to suit the activity engaged in or to suit the characteristics of the wearer. For example, one runner may need only a short time delay because that runner may take many relatively short strides while a second runner may need a longer delay because the second runner may take longer strides. In some embodiments, the algorithm may be self-adjusting—the time delay between the pressure detected in the left sole and the impact of the right sole may be measured and used to optimize the time delay in steps 1303 and 1305 during subsequent strides.
The blow-up in
The blow-up in
Accordingly, as discussed above, the various embodiments shown in this disclosure may be used in various recreational and sporting endeavors in order to providing stability and support when needed, but also allow flexibility and comfort when such support is not otherwise needed. As described above, the reel and cable system provides support in specific regions of the upper when the upper is under stress, but returns to a more flexible state when support is not needed.
Although the embodiments depict a dynamic support system for an article of footwear, it is contemplated that other embodiments could include dynamic support systems for other kinds of apparel, including articles of clothing, sports pads and/or other sporting equipment. In particular, the embodiments could be used in combination with any of the article types, as well as the padding systems disclosed in Beers, U.S. Patent Publication Number 2015/0297973, published Oct. 22, 2015, now U.S. Patent Application Number, filed Apr. 22, 2014, and titled “Article of Apparel with Dynamic Padding System,” the entirety of which is herein incorporated by reference.
While various embodiments of the invention have been described, the description is intended to be exemplary, rather than limiting and it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that many more embodiments and implementations are possible that are within the scope of the invention. Accordingly, the invention is not to be restricted except in light of the attached claims and their equivalents. Also, various modifications and changes may be made within the scope of the attached claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/197,191, filed Jun. 29, 2016, which application is a divisional of Rushbrook et al., U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/258,480, filed Apr. 22, 2014, issued on Jul. 5, 2016 as U.S. Pat. No. 9,380,834, both of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3978525 | Bothwell | Sep 1976 | A |
4741115 | Pozzobon | May 1988 | A |
4771556 | Kim | Sep 1988 | A |
4843740 | Walkhoff | Jul 1989 | A |
4907354 | Benoit et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4924605 | Spademan | May 1990 | A |
4958459 | Davidson | Sep 1990 | A |
4999932 | Grim | Mar 1991 | A |
5109614 | Curry | May 1992 | A |
5125171 | Stewart | Jun 1992 | A |
5373651 | Wood | Dec 1994 | A |
5500952 | Keyes | Mar 1996 | A |
5535531 | Karabed | Jul 1996 | A |
5722187 | Pamio et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5896590 | Fleisch | Apr 1999 | A |
5950335 | Okajima | Sep 1999 | A |
5985383 | Allen | Nov 1999 | A |
6012162 | Bullat | Jan 2000 | A |
6032299 | Welsh | Mar 2000 | A |
6170175 | Funk | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6381876 | Krajcir | May 2002 | B2 |
6779280 | Wright et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6951033 | Dainese | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7150048 | Buckman | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7225563 | Chen | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7370440 | Cole, III | May 2008 | B1 |
7386947 | Martin | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7540100 | Pawlus et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7591050 | Hammerslag | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7752774 | Ussher | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7810258 | Narajowski et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7836608 | Greene | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7849525 | Ghajar | Dec 2010 | B2 |
8104196 | Spinelli | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8151488 | Aveni | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8215032 | Sokolowski et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8356429 | Eder | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8661714 | Sussmann | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8844167 | Greene | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8935860 | Torres | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9380834 | Rushbrook | Jul 2016 | B2 |
10034512 | Rushbrook | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10070683 | Rushbrook | Sep 2018 | B2 |
20020184790 | Davis | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030177661 | Tsai | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030182040 | Davidson | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040181972 | Csorba | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050102861 | Martin | May 2005 | A1 |
20060032090 | Chen et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060117600 | Greene | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060185193 | Pellegrini | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060196083 | Martin | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070000154 | DiBenedetto | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070006489 | Case, Jr. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070011919 | Case, Jr. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070044346 | Ungari | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070068040 | Farys | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070130799 | Seliger et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070260421 | Berner, Jr. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080066346 | Hammerslag et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080083135 | Hammerslag | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080168685 | Kim et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080301919 | Ussher | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090183392 | Shane | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090229144 | Sussman | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090284368 | Case, Jr. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100036306 | Lussier | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100063778 | Schrock | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100088927 | Spinelli | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100154255 | Robinson | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100299959 | Hammerslag et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110030244 | Motawi et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110047684 | Jan et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110258876 | Baker et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110277349 | Kim | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110308113 | Hartford | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120000091 | Cotterman et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120011744 | Bell et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120110870 | Haouari | May 2012 | A1 |
20120180341 | Crowley, II et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120251079 | Meschter et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120291563 | Schrock | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120291564 | Amos | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130104429 | Torres | May 2013 | A1 |
20130213144 | Rice et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130213147 | Rice et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140026440 | Beers et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140070042 | Beers et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140157627 | Smaldone et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140277631 | Rice | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140305006 | Azoulay | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150059206 | Lovett | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20160306339 | Rushbrook et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160309830 | Rushbrook et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20190082773 | Rushbrook | Mar 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101217894 | Jul 2008 | CN |
101642292 | Feb 2010 | CN |
102014682 | Apr 2011 | CN |
102958395 | Mar 2013 | CN |
202999456 | Jun 2013 | CN |
106455747 | Feb 2017 | CN |
106455747 | Apr 2018 | CN |
108378455 | Aug 2018 | CN |
108391892 | Aug 2018 | CN |
108378455 | Aug 2020 | CN |
3133947 | Nov 2018 | EP |
2924577 | Jun 2009 | FR |
1434141 | May 1976 | GB |
2004352113 | Dec 2004 | JP |
WO-2009071652 | Jun 2009 | WO |
WO-2010004538 | Jan 2010 | WO |
WO-2014036374 | Mar 2014 | WO |
WO-2015163982 | Oct 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/258,480, Examiner Interview Summary dated Feb. 18, 2016”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/258,480, Non Final Office Action dated Nov. 20, 2015”, 19 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/258,480, Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 7, 2016”, 8 pgs. |
“Application U.S. Appl. No. 14/258,480, Response filed 02-22-16 to Non Final Office Action mailed 11-20-15”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/258,480, Response filed Sep. 28, 2015 to Restriction Requirement dated Jul. 30, 2015”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/258,480, Restriction Requirement dated Jul. 30, 2015”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/197,020, Non Final Office Action dated Nov. 1, 2017”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/197,020, Notice of Allowability dated Apr. 19, 2018”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/197,020, Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 4, 2018”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/197,020,Response Filed Jan. 31, 2018 to Non Final Office Action dated Nov. 1, 2017”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/197,191, Non Final Office Action dated Nov. 22, 2017”, 19 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/197,191, Notice of Allowance dated May 14, 2018”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/197,191, Response filed Feb. 22, 2018 to Non Final Office Action dated Nov. 22, 2017”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/197,191, Response filed Oct. 9, 2017 to Restriction Requirement dated Aug. 7, 2017”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/197,191, Restriction Requirement dated Aug. 7, 2017”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/105,090, Preliminary Amendment Filed Dec. 6, 2018”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/105,090, Restriction Requirement dated Mar. 20, 2020”, 7 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201580033622.7, Response filed Nov. 17, 2017 to Office Action dated Jun. 2, 2017”, w/ claims in English, 67 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201810312380.0, Office Action dated Feb. 28, 2019”, w/ English summary, 6 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201810312380.0, Office Action dated Sep. 27, 2019”, W/English Translation, 7 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201810312380.0, Response filed Sep. 5, 2019 to Office Action dated Feb. 28, 2019”, w/ English claims, 17 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201810312380.0, Voluntary Amendment filed Dec. 6, 2018”, w/ English claims, 21 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201580033622.7, Office Action dated Jun. 2, 2017”, w/ brief summary from agent's letter, 6 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 15710090.0, Response filed Apr. 20, 2017 to Communication Pursuant to Rules 161(1) and 162 EPC dated Dec. 20, 2016”, 13 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 18204546.8, Extended European Search Report dated May 10, 2019”, 8 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2015/019382, International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Nov. 3, 2016”, 10 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2015/019382, International Search Report dated Jun. 1, 2015”, 6 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2015/019382, Written Opinion dated Jun. 1, 2015”, 8 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 18204546.8, Response filed Dec. 12, 2019 to Extended European Search Report dated May 10, 2019”, 40 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201810312380.0, Response filed Feb. 12, 2020 to Office Action dated Sep. 27, 2019”, w English claims, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/105,090, Examiner Interview Summary dated Jul. 14, 2020”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/105,090, Non Final Office Action dated Jun. 22, 2020”, 27 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/105,090, Response filed May 20, 2020 to Restriction Requirement dated Mar. 20, 2020-20”, 8 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201810309298.2, Office Action dated May 21, 2020”, W/English Translation, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 16 105,090, Response filed Nov. 23, 2020 to Non Final Office Action dated Jun. 22, 2020”, 12 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200221814 A1 | Jul 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14258480 | Apr 2014 | US |
Child | 15197191 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16105090 | Aug 2018 | US |
Child | 16835577 | US | |
Parent | 15197191 | Jun 2016 | US |
Child | 16105090 | US |