Patent Grant
7084766
The invention relates to security tags in general, and in particular to a tag body containing an attaching means for use in electronic article surveillance (EAS) tags.
Various types of electronic article surveillance (EAS) systems are known having the common feature of employing a marker or tag which is affixed to an article to be protected against theft, such as merchandise in a store. When a legitimate purchase of the article is made, the marker can either be removed from the article, or converted from an activated state to a deactivated state. Such systems employ a detection arrangement, commonly placed at all exits of a store, and if an activated marker passes through the detection system, it is detected by the detection system and an alarm is triggered.
For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,426,419 to Nguyen et al., and assigned to Sensormatic Electronics Corporation, discloses an EAS tag having an arcuate channel that extends from an opening thereof to the actual attaching assembly and the detaching mechanism thereof. The channel increases the susceptibility of defeat of the attaching assembly because it guides an object that is inserted by an unauthorized individual directly to the attaching assembly and allows disengagement thereof.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,373,390 to Hogan et al., assigned to the same assignee as the '419 patent, is an improvement patent issued in light of the shortcomings of the '419 patent. The '390 patent admits that the EAS tag of the '419 patent “can be defeated by insertion of a segment of relatively rigid metal bent in an arcuate manner to simulate the arcuate probe of the associated detacher device.” Furthermore, the '390 patent describes a fish tape which may be formed to resemble the requisite arcuate probe in order to defeat the EAS tag of the '419 patent, “the formed fish tape 50 is strong enough to hold its form when pushed into arcuate channel 7 until it can be manipulated into and against member 6, which then can be rotated to release tack assembly 4.”
With respect to the '419 and '390 patent, many free standing arcuate probes have been either manufactured or misappropriated by unscrupulous individuals by dismantling the detacher components with which the probes are associated. The arcuate probe is inserted into the arcuate channel by hand and is lead directly to the preventing mechanism. In the '390 device, the arcuate channel leads the manipulated arcuate probe to the opening or slot located in the arcuate channel, wherein the opening further aligns and guides the hand manipulated probe directly to the preventing mechanism or member. In addition, the force required to release the preventing mechanism of the '419 and '390 device is less than the force required to release the preventing mechanism of the instant invention. Accordingly, an unscrupulous individual may easily defeat the preventing mechanism of the '419 and '390 devices by manipulating an illicitly acquired freestanding arcuate probe.
The '419 and '390 devices may be defeated by penetrating the bottom housing in proximal relation to the preventing mechanism and inserting a rigid and elongated element and forcing metal clip to rotate, whereby the preventing mechanism will release the pin. The instant device is more difficult to defeat in this manner.
In addition, the preventing mechanism of the '419 and '390 patents is attached on only one end thereof, thus allowing movement out of the horizontal plane. Consequently, the vertical movement of the clamp increases the susceptibility of defeat of the attaching assembly because the jaws expand more easily because the angle of the clamp varies between the first end and second end as a result of the vertical movement of the non-secure end. The pull force to disengage a pin from the instant device and the '419 device was conducted by using an Imada product model DPS220R, obtainable from 450 Skikie Blvd. #503, N. Brook, Ill. 60062.
The prior art does not address the need for an EAS tag that is difficult to defeat. In addition, the prior art fails to provide a clamp assembly that requires greater pull force to disengage a pin from the clamp assembly. Furthermore, the prior art fails to provide a tag that is more difficult to defeat even when an unscrupulous individual has illicitly acquired a freestanding arcuate probe. Therefore, there remains a long standing and continuing need for an advance in the art of EAS tags that is more difficult to defeat, is simpler in both design and use, is more economical, efficient in its construction and use, and provides a more secure engagement of the article.
Accordingly, it is a general object of the present invention to overcome the disadvantages of the prior art.
Therefore, it is a primary objective of the invention to provide an EAS tag that is more difficult to defeat.
It is another objective of the invention to provide a cost-efficient EAS tag.
It is another objective of the invention to provide an EAS tag that is durable.
It is yet another objective of the invention to provide an EAS tag that does not have an arcuate channel that may be used to guide an unauthorized detaching probe to the attaching member.
It is a further objective of the invention to provide an EAS tag that is detachable when used with an authorized detaching unit.
In keeping with the principles of the present invention, a unique EAS tag is disclosed wherein no channel is defined therein that will guide an unauthorized probe to the attaching member. The interior of the tag further has numerous partitions and pillars that will prevent insertion of the unauthorized probe if inserted in the wrong plane. In addition, the EAS tag will deflect the unauthorized probe into false paths.
The EAS tag of the instant invention also discloses a metal clip that has an attaching region for receiving a shaft of a pin securely therein. The pin is removable when an authorized detacher is used to insert a probe into an opening within the EAS tag, and as a result of the secure fit of the tag within the detacher's nesting portion, the probe guides itself to the attaching member and applies a force thereto. The clip is slideably mounted onto at least one track that causes the clip to travel in a linear motion and causing the attaching region to release a shaft of the pin.
Furthermore, an apex region of the EAS tag that encloses the attaching member has a honeycombed shape such that unauthorized probes cannot be inserted into holes created above the attaching member to manipulate the same.
Such stated objects and advantages of the invention are only examples and should not be construed as limiting the present invention. These and other objects, features, aspects, and advantages of the invention herein will become more apparent from the following detailed description of the embodiments of the invention when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and the claims that follow.
It is to be understood that the drawings are to be used for the purposes of illustration only and not as a definition of the limits of the invention. In the drawings, wherein similar reference characters denote similar elements throughout the several views:
Referring now to
Now referring to
An attaching member 34, as described in greater detail hereinafter, slideably rests on at least first track 30, but in a preferred embodiment, rests on both first and second tracks 30 and 32. Attaching member 34 has a resilient member 36 that normally maintains an opening 38 defined on said attaching member 34 in axial alignment with an aperture 40 defined on the inside of second half 24 and a hole 42 defined on the interior of first half 22. In one preferred embodiment, attaching member 34 is made of spring sheet metal. Resilient member 36 may be a resilient lever arm 43 and in an alternate preferred embodiment, as illustrated in
Now referring to
Now referring to
Now also referring to
Now also referring to
In order to disengage shaft 52 from jaws 96 and 98, enough force must be applied to forward edge 75 of attaching member 34 to overcome the force exerted by the resilient member 36, and to move attaching member 34 towards rearward edge 75. In addition, the force must be sufficient to overcome the frictional force created between first interior wall 88 and second outer surface 118 and the frictional force created between second interior wall 90 and first outer surface 116. In order to do so, a probe 8 of a predetermined shape and length must be inserted through entrance 56 of tag 20 and extend to attaching member 34 to apply the sufficient necessary force to forward edge 75 to overcome the force exerted by the resilient member 36 and the frictional force described above to allow sufficient linear movement along first and second tracks 30 and 32 to disengage and remove shaft 52 from first and second jaws 96 and 98. U.S. Pat. No. 4,738,258 is hereby incorporated by reference for teaching the probe 8 required and the necessary actuation thereof for insertion into entrance 56. U.S. Pat. No. 4,738,258 can be modified into the disengagement apparatus illustrated in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,426,419 and 5,535,606, the teachings of the detacher are also incorporated herein by reference.
To determine the force required to disengage the shaft 52 from jaws 96 and 98 of attaching member 34 of the instant invention as compared to the tag of the '419 patent, the following experiment was conducted on ten tags 10 of the instant invention and ten tags produced in accordance with the specification of the '419 patent. A spring balance was hung on a wall, with its spring loading hook at the bottom. Two ends of a cotton sling were tied to form a loop. One end of the loop was secured on the hook of the balance whereas the other end was wound through the handle such that a downward pull force on the detacher (as illustrated in FIGS. 11 and 12 of the '419 patent) led to the squeezing of the detacher's trigger. Because the spring balance is in series with the sling, a measure of the triggering force to detach the tack shaft 52 could be measured. On average, approximately five pounds more force was required to detach the shaft 52 from the attaching member 34 of the instant invention than the tag of the '419 patent.
In order to defeat the introduction of unauthorized probes into entrance 56, several false paths and barriers are provided within tag 20 and the arcuate channel of the '419 patent and the '390 patent are completely eliminated. Because apex region 25 of tag 20 is constructed to be securely retained within a nesting or cradle area of a detacher, as taught by the '419 patent, tag 20 does not require any arcuate channels to lead the detaching probe 8 to the forward edge 75 of the attaching member 34. The predetermined shape of the detaching probe 8 and the predetermined positioning of the attaching member 34 allow an authorized individual using an authorized detacher to disengage the shaft 52 from jaws 96 and 98, thereby releasing the attached article. Dashed line 99, of
However, to defeat even the introduction of a probe that has been illicitly disassembled from an authorized detacher, a first partition 58 prevents entrance of the unauthorized probe if at an incorrect plane. A second partition 60 having a greater height than first partition 58, also prevents the introduction of an unauthorized probe to attaching member 34. A first pillar 62 and a second pillar 64 also prevent application of force to attaching member 34 by an unauthorized probe by deflecting the same. A third partition 66, a fourth partition 68, a fifth partition 70, and sixth partition 72 are at different levels and define a plurality of cavities 74 therebetween. Cavities 74 extend within apex region 25 and are substantially perpendicular to the plane of attaching member 34, such that an unauthorized probe inserted through apex region 25 will be retained within a single cavity 74 and will not be able to manipulate attaching member 34 laterally to disengage shaft 52.
Furthermore, if an unauthorized probe is being manipulated by hand, the probe will not be inserted at the correct plane to make proper contact with forward edge 75 of attaching member 34 to disengage the same. Instead, the unauthorized probe will go into the space defined between attaching member 34 and the different partitions 66, 68, 70, and 72.
Referring now also to
However, as illustrated in
In such a system, transmitting means 130 transmits pulses in the form of RF bursts at a frequency in the low radio-frequency range, such as 58 kHz in a preferred embodiment but may be adapted to be at any appropriate frequency as desired. The pulses (bursts) are emitted (transmitted) at a repetition rate of, for example 60 Hz AC cycle, with a pause between successive pulses. The detecting means 134 includes a receiver 136 which is synchronized (gated) with the transmitting means 130 so that it is activated only during the pauses between the pulses emitted by the transmitting means 130. The receiver 136 expects to detect nothing in these pauses between the pulses. If an activated tag is present within the surveillance zone 132, however, the resonator therein is excited by the transmitted pulses, and will be caused to oscillate at the transmitter frequency, i.e., at 58 kHz in the above example. The resonator emits a signal which rings at the resonator frequency, with an exponential decay time (“ring-down time”). The signal emitted by the activated tag, if it is present between transmitting means 130 and the receiver 136, is detected by the receiver 136 in the pauses between the transmitted pulses and the receiver accordingly triggers an alarm 138. Alarm 138 may be audible and/or visual or can be a silent alarm that is detected by any means known in the art.
In a preferred embodiment, to minimize false alarms, the detecting means 134 usually must detect a signal in at least two, and preferably four, successive pauses; however, it is to be understood that the present invention can be adapted to function within one pause. Furthermore, in order to further minimize false alarms, such as due to signals produced by other RF sources, the receiver 136 employs two detection windows within each pause. The receiver 136 integrates any 58 kHz signal (in this example) which is present in each window, and compares the integration results of the respective signals integrated in the windows. Since the signal produced by the tag is a decaying signal, if the detected signal originates from a resonator in a tag it will exhibit decreasing amplitude (integration result) in the windows. By contrast, an RF signal from another RF source, which may coincidentally be at, or have harmonics at, the predetermined resonant frequency, would be expected to exhibit substantially the same amplitude (integration result) in each window. Therefore, alarm 138 is triggered only if the signal detected in both windows in a pause exhibits the aforementioned decreasing amplitude characteristic in each of a number of successive pauses.
For this purpose, as noted above, the receiver electronics is synchronized by a synchronization circuit with the transmitter electronics. The receiver electronics is activated by the synchronization circuit to look for the presence of a signal at the predetermined resonant frequency in a first activation window of about 1.7 ms after the end of each transmitted pulse. For reliably distinguishing the signal (if it originated from the resonator) integrated within this first window from the signal integrated in the second window, a high signal amplitude is desirable in the first window. Subsequently, the receiver electronics is deactivated, and is then re-activated in a second detection window at approximately 6 ms after the original resonator excitation, in order to again look for and integrate a signal at the predetermined resonant frequency. If such a signal is integrated with approximately the same result as in the first detection window, the evaluation electronics assumes that the signal detected in the first window did not originate from a marker, but instead originated from noise or some other external RF source, and alarm 138 therefore is not triggered.
Now also referring to
Middle portion 148 is adapted to receive conducting member 140 thereon in a coiled fashion on an outer surface 152 thereof between first wall 144 and second wall 146. Middle portion 148 has an inner surface 154 that defines cavity 150. A magnetic member 156 is adapted to be received within cavity 150 and to be frictionally retained within inner surface 154 of middle portion 148. Magnetic member 156 may be a ferromagnetic material or any other material having magnetic properties, and in a preferred embodiment, magnetic member 156 is made of amorphous metals.
Capacitance element 128 is a parallel plate capacitor formed of conductive material on a first plate and a second plate (not shown) that are known in the art. Capacitance element 128 is adapted to be received on first member 142, and in a preferred embodiment is received on first wall 144 thereof. First plate and second plate of capacitance element 128 are attached to opposing ends of conducting member 140 to form a series circuit.
When resonant tag circuit 124 enters a surveillance zone 132 it is subjected to an electromagnetic field and magnetic member 156 is charged. As the electromagnetic field is removed, the stored magnetic energy stored in the magnetic member 156 is released and thus an ac current is generated within inductive element 126 and capacitance element 128. When an ac voltage is applied to the resonant tag circuit 124, the current depends on the frequency thereof. The resonant frequency of circuit 124 can be determined by the following equation:
Wherein fo is the resonant frequency of the circuit and L is the inductance and C is the capacitance. As can be ascertained from the equation, many possible combinations yield the desired resonant frequency, however, the L to C ratio is preferably kept high in order for the circuit to be selective and minimize undesirable resonances to disturbances close to the resonant frequency thus minimizing false alarms. In a preferred embodiment, optimal values were determined to be L=2.08 mH and C=3.6 nF thus yielding an L to C ratio of 577,777.78.
It is to be understood that resonant tag circuit 124 is of sufficient size to be stored within casings used in article surveillance systems. Specifically, tag circuit 124 is of sufficient size to be received and enclosed within compartment 76 of tag 20. Compartment 76 is defined by a peripheral wall 158 extending inwardly from second half 24 to enclose the resonant tag circuit 124 therein. A false path 160 is created between second side wall 28 and peripheral wall 158.
If an article having resonant tag circuit 124 attached thereto via tag 20 is moved into the surveillance zone 132, the alarm 138 will be activated by circuit 124 to signify unauthorized removal of the article through a specified area. For purposes of illustration but not limitation, in a preferred embodiment, the length of circuit 124 is less than 2 cm and the radius thereof is less than 1 cm. However, it is to be understood that alternate sizes and shapes of circuit 124 will also function as taught and alternate electronic detection circuits as are known in the art may also be used.
While the above description contains many specificities, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of the invention, but rather as an exemplification of one preferred embodiment thereof. Many other variations are possible without departing from the essential spirit of this invention. Accordingly, the scope of the invention should be determined not by the embodiment illustrated, but by the appended claims and their legal equivalents.
The contents of this application are related to a provisional application having Ser. No. 60/371,063 filed on Apr. 8, 2002, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 527358 | Bonner | Oct 1894 | A |
| 888478 | Drew | May 1908 | A |
| 1493087 | Toney | May 1924 | A |
| 2352392 | Kost | Jun 1944 | A |
| 3882702 | Wiczer | May 1975 | A |
| 3914829 | Paskert | Oct 1975 | A |
| 3942829 | Humole et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
| 3947930 | Martens et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
| 3974581 | Martens et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
| 4103295 | Doerre | Jul 1978 | A |
| 4196424 | Williamson | Apr 1980 | A |
| 4221025 | Martens et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
| 4311992 | DeChant | Jan 1982 | A |
| 4523356 | Charlot, Jr. | Jun 1985 | A |
| 4633606 | Cohr | Jan 1987 | A |
| 4738258 | Cohr et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4739565 | Reggers | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4751500 | Minasy et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4940968 | De Nood | Jul 1990 | A |
| 5031756 | Buzzard et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5039982 | Bruhwiler | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5069047 | Lynch et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5079540 | Narlow et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5086632 | Hsu | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5194845 | Sirmon et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5347262 | Thurmond et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5421177 | Sieber et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5426419 | Nguyen et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5535606 | Nguyen et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 6373390 | Hogan et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20030222780 A1 | Dec 2003 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60371063 | Apr 2002 | US |
