This applies to an articulated crawler dozer with 4 independent tracks and a suspension system. In this configuration, the track systems are mounted such that they can move in a way that they can follow the contour of the ground.
Conventional construction machinery (dozers, loaders, backhoes, skid steers, graders, etc) do not usually have cushioning suspension systems beyond the pneumatic tires included with some of this equipment. Thus, the machine ride can be very harsh when the terrain on which the vehicle travels is rough or uneven.
It is generally recognized that harshness of ride in construction machinery may be reduced via the use of suspension systems but only at a cost of lowered operational accuracy and efficiency. One major concern with suspension systems is the undesired motions that can result because of the addition of the systems as compared to a rigid mounted system. Thus, more sophisticated suspension systems are avoided as these systems tend to introduce vehicular height variations during work operations, causing inaccuracies and reducing work efficiencies.
An example of the height variations noted above is the vertical motion observed when a Semi-tractor trailer combination accelerates from a stop light. The forces from acceleration on these vehicles can, and often do, result in a twisting of the vehicle. Another example is the squat observed in the rear axle of automobiles with certain independent rear axle suspension systems. Such movements could be detrimental to the ability of a grading machine to perform its required tasks; squatting and twisting motions can cause changes in the position of a work tool such as, for example, a blade relative to the ground. Thus, the addition of suspension to a conventional work machine such as a grader can create a situation that improves vehicle ride but counters the operational efficiency of the machine by rendering a softness in the vehicle support and degrading the accuracy of blade movements.
The invention includes a front A-frame and a rear A-frame as well as an articulated chassis having a front portion and a rear portion. The front and rear A-frames are pivotally attached to the front and rear portions of the articulated chassis, respectively, via ball joints. The point of attachment for the front A-frame is slightly forward of the chassis articulation joint and the point of attachment for the rear A-frame is slightly rearward of the chassis articulation joint. Relative lateral movement between the front and rear A-frames and the respective front and rear portions of the articulated chassis to which they are attached are constrained due to pan hard rod connections between each of the A-frames and the articulated chassis at each end of the articulated chassis. Toward each end of the chassis two suspension cylinders situated between the chassis and each A-frame support the articulated chassis above the A-frames allowing relative vertical movements between the A-frames and the chassis.
The A-frames are essentially of equal length while the ball joints for the A-frame connections are located along the centerline of the vehicle; and positioned as close together as practical. Such an arrangement results in vertical forces at the ball joint attachments to the chassis that are equal in magnitude and opposite in direction, tending to neutralize loads that would otherwise cause height variations in the chassis upon acceleration/deceleration of the vehicle. The close proximity of the two ball joints also results in minimal torque on the frame and, thus, decreased height variations.
Embodiments of the invention will be described in detail, with references to the following figures, wherein:
The exemplary embodiment of the invention described herein is applied to a crawler dozer with 4 independent tracks. In this configuration, the tracks are mounted such that they can move in a way that they can follow the contour of the ground. Each of the tracks pivot independently.
A first A-frame 200 is pivotally connected to both the first and second track frames or rocker arms 51 and 61 at mounting frames 20a and 200b which are integral portions of the first A-frame 200 as illustrated in
It is also desired to control vehicle roll position at this front axle 203. To accomplish this, the head end of the first cylinder 231 is hydraulically connected to the rod end of the second cylinder 232. Conversely the head end of the second cylinder 232 is hydraulically connected to the rod end of the first cylinder 231 as illustrated in
The first and second cylinders 231, 232 are attached to the first A-frame 200 at a point behind the respective first and second track frame pivots 51a, 61a necessitating increased operating pressure levels. The higher pressure levels contribute to the roll stability mentioned above.
A second A-frame structure 210 is pivotally connected to both the third and fourth track frames, i.e., rocker arms 71,81. The second A-frame 210 is connected to the rear chassis portion 210, i.e., the narrowest portion of the second A-frame 210 along the vehicle length, primarily at the top of the “A” with a spherical ball joint 211 as illustrated in
It is desired to have the rear axle oscillate to ensure all 4 tracks maintain ground contact at all times. This is done by hydraulically connecting the head ends of the third and fourth cylinders 233, 234 together to allow oil to flow from one to the other as needed. The rod ends of the third and fourth cylinders 233, 234 are also hydraulically connected.
The third and fourth suspension cylinders 233, 234 are attached to the second A-frame 210 at a point behind the third and fourth rocker arm pivots 71a, 81a so that they operate at reduced pressure levels and provide for a smoother and softer ride.
First and second balancing circuits 240, 241 are hydraulic circuits that maintain the nominal distances between the front chassis portion 100 and the first A-frame 200 and the rear chassis portion 110 and the second A-frame 210.
The blade mounting structure, referred to as the C-Frame 23, is operatively attached to the first A-Frame 200. This ensures that the blade level (right to left with respect to the operator) will be consistent with the positions of the track systems 50, 60 and that it will not be unduly affected by motions of the front chassis portion 100 which are enabled by the suspension system motion.
As illustrated in
Having described the illustrated embodiment, it will become apparent that various modifications can be made without departing from the scope of the invention as defined in the accompanying claims.
This document claims priority based on U.S. provisional; application Ser. No. 60/631,541, filed Nov. 29, 2004, and entitled ARTICULATED DOZER WITH FRAME STRUCTURE FOR DECREASED HEIGHT VARIATION IN THE VEHICLE CHASSIS, under 35 U.S.C. 119(e).
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2673616 | Moores | Mar 1954 | A |
3435908 | Sunderlin et al. | Apr 1969 | A |
3763938 | Brodersen | Oct 1973 | A |
3899028 | Morris et al. | Aug 1975 | A |
3907041 | Manor | Sep 1975 | A |
3974699 | Morris et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
3986563 | Stubben | Oct 1976 | A |
4053017 | Gill et al. | Oct 1977 | A |
4061194 | McCanse | Dec 1977 | A |
4088236 | Moore | May 1978 | A |
4124080 | McCanse | Nov 1978 | A |
4213507 | Horrer et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4340126 | Larson | Jul 1982 | A |
4635730 | Larsson | Jan 1987 | A |
4696350 | Ruhter et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4807461 | Brimeyer et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
5074061 | Thompson | Dec 1991 | A |
5533587 | Dow et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5549412 | Malone | Aug 1996 | A |
5632350 | Gauvin | May 1997 | A |
5762446 | Manatt et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5775438 | Confoey et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5921706 | Manatt et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6322287 | Yelton | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6382873 | Mulders et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6691795 | L'Abbe | Feb 2004 | B2 |
20020162669 | L'abbe | Nov 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060113749 A1 | Jun 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60631541 | Nov 2004 | US |