Illustrative embodiments of the invention relate generally to ergonomic equipment for relieving repetitive workplace stresses, and more particularly to relieving cumulative stresses from work in which the unsupported, human arm, wrist and hand are engaged in protracted reaching.
Many scientific, medical and industrial tasks involve the hand deployment of lightweight objects or instruments, which must be held aloft and manipulated in space for extended periods of time. The act of ‘pipetting,’ (dispensing small amounts of liquid into numerous receptacles), for example, can require hours of delicate iterations during which the practitioner's arms remain essentially unsupported. The resulting repetitive stresses are known to be a cause of work-related shoulder and forearm trauma, including rotator cuff and carpal tunnel injuries. Fixed arm supports and supports that permit some lateral motion are known in the art and offer limited forearm and/or wrist relief. Problems arise, however, in connection with the high percentage of such tasks that protractedly require a larger—often much larger—range of horizontal and vertical motions.
Medical and scientific tasks may involve only lightweight hand-manipulated instruments and devices, but the stress on the practitioner can still be severe, due merely to the outstretched, unsupported weight of his or her arm(s) for the extended duration of these operations. Known ‘ergonomic’ shelf supports, including those on swing arms that provide a degree of lateral freedom, either restrict vertical motions or require awkward arm rotations to perform work above or below the nominal support height.
Common laboratory operations such as pipetting and ‘emulsion breaking’ however require repeated, unrestricted horizontal and vertical freedom of motion as various instruments are picked up and manipulated and set down. The ‘payload’ may indeed be trivial but the total weight of the operators cantilevered outstretched arm typically varies between three and ten pounds and self-supported can be exhausting over time, resulting in a disturbing number of injuries and lost workdays. Problems are compounded for activities utilizing even larger payloads than are used in laboratory tasks. There are countless such activities in numerous industries.
‘Pipetting’ and other medical and scientific operations, including countless surgical, dental and therapeutic procedures, could greatly benefit from having gravity effectively ‘negated’ for the practitioner by iso-elastic means that could also effortlessly parallel all the large and small motions of his or her human arm and wrist in three-dimensional space. Problems arise, however, in providing a comfortable, ergonomically appropriate connection between existing articulated support equipment and the dissimilarly articulated human arm, wrist, and/or hand.
The human arm is a biological miracle, but it is prone to fatigue, and ultimately to injuries, due to repetitive stress. What is needed is an agile supporting structure between it and an analogously jointed, lifting device, which can indefinitely preserve the unimpeded, multi-axis, angular agility of the human arm, forearm, wrist and hand. Further needed is a preferably lightweight, spring-powered, substantially frictionless mechanical arm, which uses no external power and, which fairly effortlessly follows the user's intended/hand arm positions while carrying the weight of his or her arm. It should preferably be highly iso-elastic (so it consistently lifts the selected amount of weight from the bottom to the top of its articulating range), and it should be of low inertial mass so it does not require much effort to move it along with rapidly up and down or lateral arm movements. It also preferably should include a ‘centering’ feature so it does not depart from the momentary selected position; and should be substantially frictionless to facilitate forearm rotations in pan, tilt and roll and spatial translations vertically, horizontally and towards/away-from the body of the user.
In summary, what is needed is a support apparatus that is spatially agile and can counter the weight of an outstretched human arm, wrist, and hand engaged in protracted tasks.
Illustrative embodiments of the invention provide an arm-supporting device pivotally attached to an agile lifting structure adapted to equipoise the weight of the human arm, wrist and/or hand. The lifting structure preferably contains one or more equipoising segments, such as spring-powered parallelogram lifting devices, with low-friction joints.
Illustrative embodiments of the apparatus, when attached to a fixed support apparatus analogous to that of the user's shoulder, extend through a plurality of positions paralleling those of the human arm and wrist. The apparatus preferably has an upwardly biasing force substantially countering the force of gravity, thereby facilitating protracted tasks preferably throughout the extent of human reach, while reducing or eliminating the human fatigue associated with self-support.
For further detail regarding illustrative embodiments of the invention, reference is made to the detailed description provided below, in conjunction with the following illustrations.
a and 4b show two selectable, vertically displaced pivot locations for the arm support bracket which would provide, respectively, either a slightly bottom heavy or a neutral balance for the human forearm (not shown) on the contoured armrest surface according to illustrative embodiment of the invention.
a shows a compliant beanbag-type rest surface according to an illustrative embodiment of the invention.
b shows the rest surface of
a and 6b show illustrative uses of the invention supporting a human forearm, respectively, tucked back toward the chest and fully extended, to display the angular agility of the arm support as it parallels human arm positions according to an illustrative embodiment of the invention.
a and 7b respectively show illustrative uses of an arm support to support the forearm at mid-chest height and fully depressed at waist height, respectively, according to an illustrative embodiment of the invention.
a shows a human arm support ‘docked’ at a position off to the side of the work area, at a level fixed slightly below mid-height of the full vertical range of the apparatus according to an illustrative embodiment of the invention.
b illustrates the undocking procedure as the user's arm is set upon the armrest surface and lowered just enough to disengage the docking mechanism according to an illustrative embodiment of the invention.
a and 10b show a human arm support apparatus mounted respectively above and below the distal end of the equipoising lifting arm to accommodate various work environment obstructions without interference according to an illustrative embodiment of the invention.
a and 12b show two illustrative embodiments of the invention that include curved, tilting rest surfaces, permitting rotation with the resting forearm and/or heel of hand.
A provision for angular adjustment of the arm support apparatus is preferably provided to axially bias the arm supporting shelf to help keep the human forearm aboard or positioned comfortably during various exertions.
Hinge pivot axle 12 captures ball rod ends 13 which are preferably adjustably attached to armrest support block 14. Armrest support bracket 15 pivots on axle 16 through bearings mounted within support block 15. Axle locating holes 18 enable selectable fore/aft balancing attitude for bracket 15. Contoured, padded armrest cushion 17 is attached to bracket 15. Its axial position can be trimmed using ball-rod-ends 13 to help prevent the resting human arm (not shown) from being dislodged by sudden lateral moves.
The mechanical lifting structure attached to embodiments of the inventive arm support preferably comprises a double section parallelogram spring arm (see
Various spring powered ‘equipoising’ parallelogram arms, such as those employed to support and position payloads such as lamps, x-ray machines and dental equipment, can be employed in embodiments of the invention. Ideally the arm should be iso-elastic. These arms rely to a greater or lesser extent on friction to retain a selected angle or position, but do not necessarily provide consistent lift throughout the entire angular excursion of the parallelogram links. Arms that also may be appropriate include those described in applicant's U.S. Pat. No. 4,017,168 (Re. 32,213), the diagrams of which are incorporated herein by reference. Applicant's U.S. Pat. No. 5,360,196, diagrams of which are also incorporated herein by reference, provides examples of iso-elastic arms that will be suitable for use in illustrative embodiments of the invention. These arms produce an iso-elastic lifting range by countering the fixed weight of the assembly they support with nearly constant payload buoyancy.
Arms described in applicant's recent application no. PCT/US2006/014036 or U.S. application Ser. No. 11/403,731, Equipoising Support Apparatus, incorporated herein by reference, are also suitable for use with illustrative embodiments of the invention. The application describes a variety of single-spring geometries employing cams or cranks to dynamically improve lifting consistency and range of parallelogram articulation. The adjustment mechanisms described in the application can be employed in embodiments of the present invention, and can be user-adjusted.
Equipoising arms, such as those described in the patents/applications mentioned above can provide the desired iso-elasticity and lateral and vertical range. Features, such as knob-adjusted payload adjustment to float the range of human arm weights from the lightest to the heaviest, and analogous ‘shoulder, upper arm, elbow and forearm’ segments can be advantageous to illustrative embodiments of the invention.
It is noted that other tensioning mechanisms can be used in place of the springs referred to herein.
The horizontal arm support pivot can be adjusted with respect to the distal arm end in one or more directions. As the operator may desire, the horizontal arm support apparatus pivot can be positioned above, below or level with the arm resting surface. The pivot can be positioned level with the horizontal center of gravity to provide little or no angular bias, or can be displaced above, or below the center of gravity of the arm to yield a selectable bias for the arm to remain tilted as desired. This pivot can also be adjusted substantially horizontally to provide a bias for the forearm to be angled slightly up or down as the work dictates, or to rebalance fore-and-aft for comfort, in regard to the center of the human arm's intrinsic mass.
a and 4b show another view of the two selectable, vertically displaced pivot locations for arm support bracket 15 which provide, either a slightly bottom heavy (
a shows a beanbag-type armrest pad 21 and
a and 6b show two different lateral and angular displacements of an articulated human arm support apparatus 23, consisting of human arm support 10 moveably connected to mechanical arm 1 and carrying human forearm 28, respectively tucked back toward the chest, and fully extended—illustrating thereby the angular agility of arm support 10, and the two-axis angular isolation between arm support bracket 15 and mechanical lifting arm 1 provided by hinge 11 and pivots 12 and 16.
a and 7b show another vector of motion of the Iso-elastic mechanical arm 1 combined with arm support 10 to carry a human forearm 28 respectively at mid-chest height, and at waist height with the arm against the body, according to an illustrative embodiment of the invention. As seen in
a shows human arm support 10 fixedly ‘docked’ at a position off to the side of the work area and slightly below mid-height. In this embodiment, docking ring 26 associated with hinge 11 and pivot pin 24 engages the bottom of proximal hinge pin 27.
Embodiments of the invention may also provide for mounting the human arm support apparatus suspended from, perched above, or cantilevered alongside the mechanical arm, so that the supported human arm and/or heel of hand is disposed either above, below or alongside the analogously jointed equipoising arm—or extending back to the worker's arm or hand from a different location, as workplace requirements and spatial obstructions may dictate.
a and 10b show other illustrative embodiments of the human arm support apparatus 10 mounted, respectively above and below the distal pivot 2 of the equipoising lifting arm to accommodate various work environment obstructions without causing interference, and as alternatives to the mounting of support brackets laterally adjacent to armrest bracket 14. These arrangements may facilitate work in areas that have limited lateral room but have space available below or above the optimal range of positions for the human arm. They also can allow the human arm or parts thereof to pass over or under mechanical arm 1. In
In each of
In an illustrative embodiment of the invention, approximately plus/minus 25 degrees of reduced friction or frictionless axial roll for the resting forearm and/or heel of hand is provided, as workplace hand manipulations may require. Illustrative roll ranges are about 15° to about 35°, and about 20° to about 30°. Analogously to the roll-axis bearing of a gimbaled camera or tool support, these roll plates provide a third degree of rotational freedom that can exceed the roll-axis compliance of the beanbag armrests of
The arm support apparatus may include a simple padded rest for forearm support, or separate surfaces, pivotally interconnected around one or more axes, to permit relative angular movement between forearm and wrist (and/or heel-of-hand). In another illustrative embodiment of the invention, the rotational freedom between supported forearm and wrist (or heel-of-hand) is partially achieved by a support structure comprising beanbags or buckwheat-filled bags or other compliant media, such as longitudinally disposed, air-filled, toroidal cushions. This can allow the arm and hand to rotate without lifting from, or sliding on the resting support.
Embodiments of the invention may also provide additional articulation between the arm-supporting portion of the structure and the hand-supporting portion such that the human forearm and hand may be angularly exercised relative to one another in as many as three roughly perpendicular axes without undue restriction or external influence.
a and 12b show illustrative embodiments of the human arm support 10 of
b shows a tilting roll plate to permit the forearm, either together with or separate from the heel-of-hand, a greater degree of rotation than any fixed pad (or beanbag) support. Armrest pad 31 can be configured to accommodate only the forearm or can allow the forearm and heel-of-hand to rest on it. Armrest pad 31 can be individually molded to fit a wide gamut of arm sizes and shapes, or custom fitted by means such as of microwaveable or vacuum-set beanbags.
An arm supporting apparatus may be attached to various support structures, including, but not limited to tables and chairs.
Illustrative embodiments of the invention also provide for user-adjustment of lifting forces and pivot-axis offsets to tailor support performance for varying human arm weights, lengths, densities and operator preferences, and also to accommodate the bulk and weight of any required protection and/or isolation apparel. Equipoising arm supports can preferably be hand-adjusted to provide the desired lift.
In another illustrative embodiment of the invention, a centering mechanism, impelled by cams or a resilient mechanism for example, helps maintain lateral neutrality of position and counteract the tendency of pivoted inter-connected links to be laterally unstable due to accumulated component and bearing tolerances or other reasons.
Hinges, such as those described in patent application PCT/US2008/056511, incorporated herein by reference, also are suitable for use with illustrative embodiments of the invention. Application PCT/US2008/056511 describes a ‘biased hinge’ that may further improve arm performance by helping to maintain the selected lateral position of the arm segments (which is sometimes termed ‘centering’ but is not restricted to a bias to a symmetrically centered position).
Embodiments of the invention may also provide a ‘docking/undocking’ mechanism to permit the upward bias at the distal end of the arm mechanism to be restrained at a convenient position and height so that the human operator can un-dock it instantly by depressing the support surface and moving it laterally. Illustrative hardware includes a hook and mating eye, that permits immobilizing the entire support arm at a convenient position and height by, for example, simply swinging over to that position and permitting the hook to rise into the receiving eye. The operator can then lift off his or her own arm to perform other parts of the work that do not require arm support.
Illustrative embodiments of the invention may also be mounted to a harness worn by an ambulatory worker and allow the performance of protracted tasks with reduced or eliminated arm fatigue often associated with of self-support, without exerting undue influence on the arm and/or wrist throughout the operative extent of human reach and the area of work accessible by foot. Any harness that can support the weight of the apparatus, portion of the human body resting on the apparatus, and any devices attached thereto, and that allows for the required amount of movement, is suitable. Harnesses are preferably also ergonomically designed with comfort of the wearer in mind.
Note that other combinations and permutations permitting angular independence between heel of hand and forearm, including those separately disclosed by
Following is additional information for regarding the claim language and embodiments described herein.
Reference to “horizontal” and “vertical” throughout is made in a broad sense and is intended to include positions that are about horizontal or vertical. It is further noted that in certain embodiments of the invention, horizontal components can be substituted for vertical components and vice versa.
An upper body appendage is used herein to mean any portion of the appendage that includes the arm, hand and wrist. Throughout the application, the terms “arm” and “hand” include any portions thereof and in some instances can also include the wrist or portions thereof.
Components “attached” or “connected” to the articulating support arm can be attached or connected directly or indirectly, such as to an end block, bracket, etc.
The support to which the articulating support structure can be mounted can be mobile, such as a cart, dolly, or person, can be stationary, such as a post, beam, chair, or table.
Though the invention is described with reference to the particular embodiments herein set forth, it is understood that the present disclosure is made only by way of example and that numerous changes in the details of construction may be resorted to without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the specific illustrative embodiments, but be interpreted within the full spirit and scope of the claims and their equivalents.
This application is based on, and claims priority to, U.S. provisional application No. 60/968,974, having a filing date of Aug. 30, 2007, and entitled Articulated Human Arm Support.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2008/074554 | 8/28/2008 | WO | 00 | 2/23/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/029693 | 3/5/2009 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1070525 | Pieper | Aug 1912 | A |
1494638 | Sheldon | May 1924 | A |
1505567 | Kelley | Aug 1924 | A |
1639815 | Siebrandt | Aug 1927 | A |
1674669 | Percy | Jun 1928 | A |
2036097 | Pieper | Mar 1936 | A |
2076446 | Carwardine | Apr 1937 | A |
2090439 | Carwardine | Aug 1937 | A |
2700524 | Lauterbach | Jan 1955 | A |
2941776 | Lauterbach | Jun 1960 | A |
3311340 | Riis | Mar 1967 | A |
3333613 | Bosse | Aug 1967 | A |
3393938 | Meyer et al. | Jul 1968 | A |
3409261 | Leporati | Nov 1968 | A |
3426190 | Bobrick | Feb 1969 | A |
3540719 | Romney | Nov 1970 | A |
3694888 | Bosse | Oct 1972 | A |
3917200 | Johnson | Nov 1975 | A |
4080530 | Krogsrud | Mar 1978 | A |
4156512 | Brown | May 1979 | A |
4158490 | Gottschalk et al. | Jun 1979 | A |
4160536 | Krogsrud | Jul 1979 | A |
4206983 | Nettman et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
4208028 | Brown et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
4265147 | Fox | May 1981 | A |
4394075 | Brown | Jul 1983 | A |
4447031 | Souder et al. | May 1984 | A |
4591122 | Kreuzer | May 1986 | A |
RE32213 | Brown | Jul 1986 | E |
4610560 | Miller | Sep 1986 | A |
4669451 | Blauth et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4700827 | Haaser | Oct 1987 | A |
4744019 | Krogsrud | May 1988 | A |
4796162 | Krogsrud | Jan 1989 | A |
4805615 | Carol | Feb 1989 | A |
4846434 | Krogsrud | Jul 1989 | A |
4852842 | O'Neill | Aug 1989 | A |
4953822 | Sharber et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4976387 | Spianti | Dec 1990 | A |
5037053 | Fox et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5074501 | Holtta | Dec 1991 | A |
5109736 | Dixon | May 1992 | A |
5111983 | Simmons | May 1992 | A |
5113768 | Brown | May 1992 | A |
5135190 | Wilson | Aug 1992 | A |
5340072 | Halbirt | Aug 1994 | A |
5348260 | Acevedo | Sep 1994 | A |
5360196 | DiGiulio et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5407249 | Bonutti | Apr 1995 | A |
D358832 | Lenny et al. | May 1995 | S |
5435515 | DiGiulio | Jul 1995 | A |
5544554 | Brightly | Aug 1996 | A |
5609316 | Tigliev | Mar 1997 | A |
5669122 | Benoit | Sep 1997 | A |
5713591 | Zarkhin et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5797054 | Paddock et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5857815 | Bailey et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
6003940 | Jackson | Dec 1999 | A |
6030130 | Paddock et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6042064 | Hong | Mar 2000 | A |
6149506 | Duescher | Nov 2000 | A |
6393708 | Culver et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6446287 | Borders | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6464183 | Bouhuijs | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6523796 | Abramowsky et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6592085 | Iwata et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6708935 | Smeed | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6711972 | Joyner et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6852107 | Wang et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6858003 | Evans | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6896230 | Cvek | May 2005 | B2 |
6923505 | Siminovitch et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6925668 | Cuschieri et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7055789 | Libbey et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7290744 | Baldasari | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7325777 | Thiessen | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7412754 | Hanson | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7618016 | Brown | Nov 2009 | B2 |
8262166 | Stuijt et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
20020134896 | Hunter | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20040026584 | Libbey et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040195883 | Vrijlandt et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050012376 | Siminovitch | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050015879 | Cuschieri | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050023015 | Argento | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050023422 | Oddsen | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050043718 | Madhani | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050224670 | Metelski | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060186281 | Thiessen | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060231700 | Orf et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070080275 | Stachowski | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070237572 | Thiessen | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080046122 | Manzo | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080106133 | Vrijlandt et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080210842 | Van Dorsser et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20150129741 | Okuda | May 2015 | A1 |
20150202017 | Nakamura | Jul 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 03046431 | Jun 2003 | AU |
8904387 | Jun 1989 | DE |
0192253 | Aug 1986 | EP |
0429008 | May 1991 | EP |
1312251 | May 2003 | EP |
1726412 | Nov 2006 | EP |
593231 | Oct 1947 | GB |
2170651 | Aug 1986 | GB |
2325393 | Nov 1998 | GB |
2006101952 | Apr 2006 | JP |
0016950 | Mar 2000 | WO |
2006113416 | Oct 2006 | WO |
20080112687 | Sep 2008 | WO |
20060113416 | Oct 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Information Disclosure Statement dated Jan. 13, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/859,526. |
Office Action dated Oct. 13, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/060,612. |
Response to Oct. 13, 2006 Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/060,612. |
Office Action dated Dec. 28, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/060,612. |
Response to Dec. 28, 2006 Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/060,612. |
Office Action dated Jun. 19, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/060,612. |
Response to Jun. 19, 2007 Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/060,612. |
Office Action dated Nov. 13, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/737,567. |
Notice of Allowability dated Oct. 9, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/060,612. |
Office Action dated Apr. 13, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/859,526. |
Information Disclosure Statement dated Mar. 9, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/677,179. |
International Search Report & Written Opinion dated Nov. 28, 2008 for PCT/US08/76331. |
International Search Report & Written Opinion dated May 12, 2009 for PCT/US09/37384. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2008/074554. |
Supplementary European Search Report dated Apr. 20, 2011 for European Patent Application No. 08799533.8. |
Boudewijn M. Wisse, Wouter D. Van Dorsser, Rogier Barents, and Just L. Herfer, Energy-Free Adjustment of Gravity Equilibrators Using the Virtual Spring Concept, Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, Jun. 12-15, 2007, 742-750, Noordwijk, The Netherlands. |
Just L. Herder, Development of a Statically Balanced Arm Support: ARMON, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, Jun. 28-Jul. 1, 2005, 281286, Chicago, IL, USA. |
Office Action dated Jan. 22, 2013 for Japan Patent Application No. 2010-523123. |
Office Action dated Oct. 4, 2013 for JP Pat. App. No. 2010-523123. |
First Notification of Examiner's Opinion issued on Aug. 31, 2011 for CN Pat. App. No. 200880105002.X. |
Second Notification of Examiner's Opinion issued on Mar. 31, 2012 for CN Pat. App. No. 200880105002.X. |
Extended European Search Report date Jul. 16, 2014 for European Patent Application No. 08828140.7. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110127390 A1 | Jun 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60968974 | Aug 2007 | US |