This invention relates to an adjustable turning loop for a vehicle safety restraint system.
A seat belt system is typically anchored to a vehicle at three different locations around a vehicle passenger. Two anchors support the lap belt portion of a seat belt while a third anchor, a loop or D-ring, located at the approximate height of the shoulder of the passenger provides support for the shoulder belt portion of the seat belt. Due to varying sizes of passengers, manufacturers use assemblies known as adjustable turning loops, which allow the shoulder loop to be adjusted up or down to accommodate these differing heights. Existing adjustable turning loops typically comprise a slide that mounts the D-ring to a rail, which is attached to the B pillar of the vehicle. The slide may be adjusted up or down by lifting or pressing an actuator, which releases a lock that holds the slide in place. The locking mechanism is frequently very complex and expensive to manufacturer and assemble. A need therefore exists for a simplified locking mechanism for an adjustable turning loop.
The present invention comprises an adjustable turning loop for a seat belt web guide. The adjustable turning loop has a rail and a slide slideably received on the rail. The slide mounts a D-ring. Like existing adjustable turning loops, the invention has a lock for maintaining the slide at a position on the rail. The lock has a locked condition limiting movement of the slide on the rail and an unlocked condition allowing movement of the slide on the rail. The lock is greatly simplified from existing structures. The lock comprises a first member and a second member. The first member and the second member pivot relative to the rail and engage the rail in the locked condition and disengage from the rail in the unlocked condition.
The first member and the second member are in contact with the rail in the locked condition. The rail has teeth for engaging the first and second members. The first member and the second member have edges that engage these teeth in the locked condition. To promote the secure locking of the slide on the rail, the first member is biased to pivot against the rail in a clockwise direction while the second member is biased to pivot against the rail in a counterclockwise direction. In this way, the slide is secured along two different directions. The first member and the second member may comprise a loop that extends around the rail. Both the first member and the second member may be biased in the locked condition. A spring may be used to bias the first and second members in this locked condition. Furthermore, a securing member that secures the web guide to the slider may form a pivot point for the first member and the second member.
The various features and advantages of this invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of the currently preferred embodiment.
Preferably, the rail 14 is oval in shape to accommodate shape of the loops 42, 46. The first loop 42 and the second loop 46 may be steel stampings. The rail 14 may be made of steel and roll formed with additional steps taken to form any needed holes or bends.
The first loop 42 is pivotally connected to the second loop 46 at a pivot point 48, the center of a nut 49, which is preferably the location for receiving the securing member 66 shown in
To unlock the slide 18 for movement along the rail 14, an actuator 26 is pressed in the direction of arrow A from the locked position shown in
The actuator 26 of the height adjuster 10 need not be limited for use with adjustable turning loops. As shown in
The aforementioned description is exemplary rather that limiting. Many modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above teachings. The preferred embodiments of this invention have been disclosed. However, one of ordinary skill in the art would recognize that certain modifications would come within the scope of this invention. Hence, within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described. For this reason the following claims should be studied to determine the true scope and content of this invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4042264 | Shumer | Aug 1977 | A |
4607863 | Yokote | Aug 1986 | A |
4926722 | Sorenson et al. | May 1990 | A |
5009134 | Sorenson et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5022137 | Sorenson et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5050907 | Boumarafi et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5102165 | Araki et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5163707 | Watanabe et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5205589 | Watanabe | Apr 1993 | A |
5230534 | Boumarafi et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5332290 | Borlinghaus et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5601311 | Pfeiffer et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5692780 | Yasui | Dec 1997 | A |
20030209899 | Arnold et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20050023815 | Hoffmann et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |