Deployable solar arrays systems have often utilized photovoltaic cells bonded to a membrane that may be z-folded while stowed, and then tensioned when deployed. Tension may be carried through the membrane.
There may be a need for new tools and techniques to address a variety of issues that may arise with the use of tension-supported membranes, while providing benefits that may not be achievable with these tension-supported membranes.
Articulating solar panel energy systems, methods, and devices are provided in accordance with various embodiments. For example, some embodiments include an articulating solar panel energy system or device that may include multiple modular solar panels and one or more tension cables that support the multiple modular solar panels. Some embodiments include one or more louvering ties coupled with the multiple modular solar panels such that the one or more louvering ties rotate the multiple modular solar panels.
Some embodiments include one or more tensioners coupled with the one or more tension cables. In some embodiments, the one or more tensioners includes at least a constant force spring or a motor to tension the one or more tension cables. Some embodiments include one or more eyelets coupled with each respective modular solar panels from the multiple modular solar panels such that each of the one or more tension cables pass through one or more of the one or more eyelets. Some embodiments include lateral supports coupled with the one or more tension cables.
Some embodiments include a deployer configured to at least deploy or retract the multiple modular solar panels. In some embodiments, the deployer includes a retractable, telescoping mast.
Some embodiments include one or more electrical harnesses coupled with the multiple modular solar panels. In some embodiments, the one or more louvering ties are configured as electrical harnesses. In some embodiments, the one or more louvering ties include an elastic component such that a spacing between adjacent modular solar panels from the multiple modular solar panels is adjustable. In some embodiments, at least one of the one or more tension cables that supports the multiple modular solar panels rotate the multiple modular solar panels.
Some embodiments include a method of articulating solar panels that may include supporting multiple modular solar panels utilizing one or more tension cables. Some embodiments include louvering the multiple modular solar panels. Some embodiments include louvering the multiple modular solar panels utilizing one or more louvering ties coupled with the multiple modular solar panels. Some embodiments include louvering the multiple modular solar panels utilizing at least one of the one or more tension cables. Some embodiments include deploying the multiple modular solar panels utilizing a retractable deployer.
In some embodiments, louvering the multiple modular solar panels includes adjusting an angle of the multiple modular solar panels based on a sun angle with respect to the multiple modular solar panels. In some embodiments, louvering the multiple modular solar panels includes adjusting an angle of the multiple modular solar panels based on at least a wind condition or dust condition with respect to the multiple modular solar panels. In some embodiments, louvering the multiple modular solar panels includes adjusting an angle of the multiple modular solar panels based on at hostile threat to the multiple modular solar panels.
Some embodiments include adjusting a spacing between the multiple modular solar panels utilizing the louvering ties. Some embodiments include rotating the multiple modular solar panels around an axis of the retractable deployer. Some embodiments include louvering the multiple modular solar panels into a retractable configuration and retracting the deployer and multiple modular solar panels. Some embodiments include utilizing the one or more louvering ties as one or more electrical harnesses.
Some embodiments include methods, systems, and/or devices as described in the specification and/or shown in the figures.
The foregoing has outlined rather broadly the features and technical advantages of embodiments according to the disclosure in order that the detailed description that follows may be better understood. Additional features and advantages will be described hereinafter. The conception and specific embodiments disclosed may be readily utilized as a basis for modifying or designing other structures for carrying out the same purposes of the present disclosure. Such equivalent constructions do not depart from the spirit and scope of the appended claims. Features which are believed to be characteristic of the concepts disclosed herein, both as to their organization and method of operation, together with associated advantages will be better understood from the following description when considered in connection with the accompanying figures. Each of the figures is provided for the purpose of illustration and description only, and not as a definition of the limits of the claims.
A further understanding of the nature and advantages of different embodiments may be realized by reference to the following drawings. In the appended figures, similar components or features may have the same reference label. Further, various components of the same type may be distinguished by following the reference label by a dash and a second label that distinguishes among the similar components. If only the first reference label is used in the specification, the description is applicable to any one of the similar components having the same first reference label irrespective of the second reference label.
This description provides embodiments, and is not intended to limit the scope, applicability, or configuration of the disclosure. Rather, the ensuing description will provide those skilled in the art with an enabling description for implementing embodiments of the disclosure. Various changes may be made in the function and arrangement of elements.
Thus, various embodiments may omit, substitute, or add various procedures or components as appropriate. For instance, it should be appreciated that the methods may be performed in an order different than that described, and that various stages may be added, omitted, or combined. Also, aspects and elements described with respect to certain embodiments may be combined in various other embodiments. It should also be appreciated that the following systems, devices, and methods may individually or collectively be components of a larger system, wherein other procedures may take precedence over or otherwise modify their application.
Articulating solar panel energy systems, methods, and devices are provided in accordance with various embodiments. Some embodiments provide for compact, low-cost, and autonomous deployable solar array systems to support lunar and Martian exploration objective; some embodiments are applicable to space or other applications. Some embodiments are configured for threat mitigation, such as targeted attacks. Some embodiments are compatible with Compact Telescoping Surface Array (CTSA) architecture.
Some embodiments provide for articulating solar panel energy systems, methods, and devices that may replace a z-folded membrane photovoltaic (PV) blanket, as may be found with some CTSA architectures, with a series of modular thin-substrate solar panels that may be supported by a series of cables and/or ties so that they may be tensioned and/or articulated in unison much like “Venetian blind” blades.
The ability to articulate the PV panels may offer unique advantages for operation for different applications, such as on the Martian or lunar surfaces, merely by way of example. The ability to rotate the substrates for direct solar pointing generally enables more efficient power generation and thus may reduce cell density on a deployed area. This reduction in density may help prevent cell shadowing at low sun angles; it may also enable the reduction in cell quantity that may lead to lower costs. Some embodiments also reduce deployed mass and stowed volume simply via the absence of additional substrates (i.e., z-folds).
Panel articulation—or feathering—and change in system porosity may reduce interaction with wind and dust accumulation, for example. The low rotational inertia of the blades in the feathering axis also may make impulses or “flicks” for dust mitigation practical. Discretization into many blades may also enable modular design for mass production and ease of replacement. The PV panel technology in accordance with various embodiments is also generally compatible with central column tensioned solar array architectures.
Articulated solar panel energy systems, methods, and devices provided in accordance with various embodiments may provide a variety of innovations that may provide benefits and/or improvements to other solar panel systems. For example, discretization of the blanket into many panels may simplify manufacturing and may provide an opportunity to reduce cost through the mass production of identical panels. Furthermore, the use of discretized panels may offer improved array modularity, as panels may be easily added or subtracted. It may even be possible, within reason, for an astronaut or robotic agent to augment the array with additional panels to accommodate evolving power needs. Similarly, discretized panels, as opposed to a continuous tensioned blanket, may enable an astronaut or robotic agent to either service or replace individual panels while the array is in operation.
Other advantages may include decoupling of the structural load bearing tension elements from the solar cell substrate that may enable the use of more mass and volume efficient tension cables and mechanisms, and the ability to easily tailor tension to achieve a desired deployed stiffness. In contrast, continuous blanket arrays, where tension is generally reacted through the blanket, generally involves considering factors such as membrane tearing or creep under load, as well as changing tension as a function of time and temperature. Panel louvering may offer a second solar panel articulating axis, in addition to axial about the deployable column, which may improve sun tracking at locations other planetary or lunar poles. Furthermore, the ability to louver the panels to be perpendicular to the mast may enable simplistic and autonomous retractability.
Some embodiments utilize variable length and fully retractable central telescoping mast, which may enable the configuration of the articulating solar panels in accordance with various embodiments to be tailored for a wide range of operational scenarios, such as use at different latitudes. Some embodiments replace the continuous membrane blanket with a series of modular thin-substrate solar panels that may be supported by a series of cables.
Some embodiments provide a deployable, retractable, sun-tracking solar array that generates that provide enough power during multiple regimes of operation. Specifically, the solar array in accordance with various embodiments may be deployed and operated in zero gravity, during initial descent, retract for final descent and landing, deploy again on a surface, retract again for ascent, and/or then deploy again in zero gravity
Turning now to
Some embodiments of system 100 and/or system 100-a include one or more tensioners 135 coupled with the one or more tension cables 130, 130-a. In some embodiments, the one or more tensioners 135 include at least a constant force spring or a motor to tension the one or more tension cables 130, 130-a. Some embodiments include one or more eyelets coupled with each respective modular solar panels from the multiple modular solar panels 110, 110-a such that the one or more tension cables 130, 130-a pass through the one or more eyelets. The one or more eyelets may include one or more apertures. The one or more eyelets may include a variety of components including, but not limited to, grommets, loops, and openings that may be formed as part of the modular panels 110, 110-a and/or coupled with the modular solar panels 110, 110-a. Some embodiments include lateral supports 150 coupled with the one or more tension cables 130-a.
Some embodiments include a deployer 140 configured to at least deploy or retract the multiple modular solar panels 110-a. In some embodiments, the deployer 140 includes a retractable, telescoping mast.
Some embodiments include one or more electrical harnesses coupled with the multiple modular solar panels 110, 110-a. In some embodiments, the one or more louvering ties 120 are configured as electrical harnesses. In some embodiments, the one or more louvering ties 120 include an elastic component such that a spacing between adjacent modular solar panels from the multiple modular solar panels 110-a is adjustable. In some embodiments, at least one of the one or more tension cables 130, 130-a that support the multiple modular solar panels 110, 110-a rotate the multiple modular solar panels 110, 110-a, thus providing for the louvering function, as noted by the optional combining of tension cable(s) 130-a and the one or more louvering ties 120.
Turning now to
The position and weight of each blade is generally supported via the tensioned track lines 130-c, in this case fabricated out of a steel cable. The blade feathering angle may be controlled with thin ribbons 120-c-1, 120-c-2, which may be examples of louvering ties, that may be attached to each side of the blade substrate and may run down the entire length of the solar array. In some cases, solar array electrical harness 160-c-1, 160-c-2 may be incorporated into the feathering ribbon 120-c-1, 120-c-2, however this may be dependent on different factors.
The multiple individual panels, such as panels110-c-1, 110-c-2, 110-c-3, 110-c-4, may be electrically and mechanically integrated into the articulating solar panel system 100-c. The electrical integration and geometrical coordination of the panels may be achieved with the one or more electrical flex harnesses 160-c-1, 160-c-2. The flex-harness style flying leads integrated to the panel sub-assemblies may be what interface to the full length electrical harnesses. Once all of the panels in a sub-assembly are integrated via the electrical harnesses, the sub-assembly may be strung onto the tension cables, such the cable 130-c that is labeled in
System 100-d may include a central telescoping boom 140-d that may be deployed to tension the solar array. The left hand image generally shows a radial configuration for system 400 that includes system 100-d. The right hand image highlights aspects of system 100-d with respect to a series of modular thin-substrate solar panels 110-d-1, 110-d-2 specifically called out supported by a series of tension cables 130-d-1, 130-d-2, 130-d-3. This generally enables the panels to remain decoupled so that they can be articulated in unison much like “Venetian blind” blades as noted elsewhere utilizing one or more louvering ties 120-d-1, 120-d-2. System 100-d may also show one or more lateral supports 150-d.
The ability to articulate the PV panels may offer unique advantages for operation, such as on Martian surfaces. The ability to rotate the substrates for direct solar pointing may enable more efficient power generation and the ability to reduce the cell density on the deployed area. This reduction may help prevent cell shadowing at low sun angles, it also may enable the reduction in cell quantity leading to lower procurement costs. Some embodiments also reduce deployed mass and stowed volume simply via the absence of additional substrates (i.e., z-folds). As noted with the doubled-ended curved arrows along the right hand side of the highlighted portion of system 100-d, panel articulation—or feathering—and change in system porosity may reduce interaction with wind and dust accumulation. The low rotational inertia of the blades in the feathering axis also generally makes impulses or “flicks” for dust mitigation practical. Discretization into many blades may enable modular design for mass production and ease of replacement.
The use of discretized, articulating solar panels or blades, such as blades 110-d-1, 110-d-2, generally allows for a second solar panel articulating axis, in addition to axial (as may be shown with the double-ended curved arrow along the top of highlighted system 100-d with respect to boom 140-d), allowing for direct sun pointing and reduction of cell density of the deployed area. Furthermore, a naturally porous deployed solar panel array that reduce aeroelastic interactions with winds, such as Martian winds, may lead to reduced structural requirements and a decrease in dust accumulation. The small, individual solar substrate blades 110-d-1, 110-d-2 generally have low inertias, allowing for aerodynamic load reduction, and rotational impulse ‘flicks’ that may clean the solar arrays from dust, for example. Decoupling the load bearing tension elements from the solar cell substrates may also allow the use of more efficient, tensioned metallic and/or composite materials enabling a higher deployed stiffness. Furthermore, a discretized solar array into many blades generally simplifies manufacturing to small, individual components and provides opportunity for replacement during assembly or operation. These various benefits may allow for more efficient fabrication, utilization and life extension of the solar cells while also enabling a higher performing support structure. This may yield opportunity for a dramatic reduction in overall cost, power generation, mass, and stowed volume.
After deployment of the solar arrays, there may generally exist several uncertainties and challenges related to optimum array power production. Ground slope, flatness, deployed array shape and orientation, and dust collection has generally motived the implementation of a second rotation axis into the solar array via blade feathering. In addition to improved performance from a more direct sun angle, reductions in mass, packing volume, wind loads, and wind load fatigue can be realized. The highlighted portion of system 100-d shows in particular the structural array pitching axis (as may be shown with the double-ended curved arrow along the top of highlighted system 100-d with respect to boom 140-d) and blade feathering axis (as may be shown with the doubled ended curved arrows along the right hand side of the highlighted portion of system 100-d),that may be achieved by the various embodiments.
Merely by way of example, maximum feathering angles less than 20° may allow for somewhat higher power collection for low-latitude locations and become more significant for higher latitudes. The power-to-mass ratio generally increases with the feathering angle representing an interesting opportunity if P/M (W/kg) is a driving criterion. This may be mainly due to a decreasing mass; feathering at higher angles that generally involves larger gaps between individual panels to avoid self-shadowing at low sun angles (high feather angles) and thus fewer panels, lower mass, and a lower collection area. The porosity of the array may generally be represented by the percentage of open gaps to the total area. The array stowage volume generally decreases with increasing feather angle from the reduction in panels. A benefit of higher porosity may include the reduction in sag on the track wires due to a reduced array mass. For solar arrays on Earth, for example, power increases of only a few percent are highly sought after, especially if they come with a low cost, or for the Martian array, low complexity and low mass as is the case for the dual axis rotation.
In addition to improved power and P/M ratio, improved reduction in wind loading also may arise due to an array with porosity and adaptive panels. In general, wind loading drives may include maximum wind gust and/or fatigue loading. The maximum wind gust generally imparts the maximum (wind) load on the structure, while fatigue loading is generally directly related to cyclic/sporadic changes in wind speed, called the turbulence intensity which is defined as the root-mean-square velocity divided by the mean velocity. Merely by way of example, for a porosity of 0.2 (related to a 30°(50%) feather angle), reductions of approximately 6% and 20% of the drag coefficient and turbulence intensity may be obtained, respectively. For static blades, the drag coefficient is generally linearly proportional to the maximum load, as such only minor load reductions (6%) were expected during this worst-case scenario. A 20% reduction in turbulence intensity, however, may be quite significant from a fatigue perspective: the turbulence intensity is generally linearly proportional to velocity, and wind loading on the structure is generally related to the velocity squared. In addition, fatigue load-life diagrams for composite structures are classically defined through power-law curves. As such, reductions in turbulence intensity of several percent may reduce the fatigue load amplitudes by that percentage squared, which in turn leads to exponentially larger increases in fatigue life.
The introduction of passively adaptive panels in accordance with various embodiments, however, may lead to a much higher reduction in drag coefficient. By optimizing panel size, spacing, and adaptive feathering, porosities near 0.6 may be achieved may significantly reduce drag coefficient and further reduce turbulence intensity to values.
Due to variability in wind loading, adaptive structures may provide a highly effective method for reducing maximum loading conditions and improving fatigue life. Desired solutions generally may be low-weight, low energy use, and not introduce complex mechanisms during deployment or operation. Some articulating solar energy panel systems in accordance with various embodiments are capable of implementing both passive (for normal wind conditions) and active (for extreme storm conditions) aeroelastic control. The passive control may be based on the blade feathering. Regardless of what angle the blades are actively feathered to for the ideal sun orientation, they may be designed to adjust pitch angle due to changing wind speeds via torsion springs connected to their rotational axes. The torsion spring constants may be designed with consideration of blade inertia, expected wind conditions, and natural frequency requirements. Individual springs for each blade element may result in a highly localized response to dynamic pressure changes that may greatly reduce the wind loads by increasing porosity. This passive dynamic response feature may also naturally induce a flutter-like motion of the blades during steady and gusty wind conditions, much like the natural motion of aspen tree leaves in the wind, with the rotational/vibration motion shaking off accumulated dust while also significantly reducing overall drag loads on the array structure. In some embodiments, an active approach may be utilized to remove dust through impulse loads. Mechanical actuators controlled by the feathering ribbon may be used to impulse the blades and (rotationally) flick the dust from their surfaces.
In the event of an impending storm condition, a higher degree of structural adaptivity may be implemented. Active retraction of the solar array blades may be performed during these critical situations, while the track lines and center telescoping column remains deployed and anchored. This feature may be highly advantageous as the wind loads may be minimized, the panels may be protected from abrasion, and the blades will collect minimum dust in their stowed condition.
The right hand image of
Close attention with respect to the gaps in between panels 110-h at any given location may help ensure that panels 110-h do not shadow one another while tracking the sun. Some embodiments enable this gap to be easily tailored by lengthening or shortening the mast 140-h (see
Turning now to
Some embodiments utilize harness 160-1 to affect louvering of the panels 110-1 respectively. Some embodiments utilize separate louvering ties, such as ties 120-k-1, 120-k-2 or 120-1-1, 120-1-2, that may be separate from the harnesses 160-k or 160-1 or tension cable 130-k or 130-1.
Turning now to
At block 1010, multiple modular solar panels may be supported utilizing one or more tension cables. Some embodiments include louvering the multiple modular solar panels such as shown with block 1020. Some embodiments include louvering the multiple modular solar panels utilizing one or more louvering ties coupled with the multiple modular solar panels. Some embodiments include louvering the multiple modular solar panels utilizing at least one of the one or more tension cables. Some embodiments include deploying the multiple modular solar panels utilizing a retractable deployer.
In some embodiments, louvering the multiple modular solar panels includes adjusting an angle of the multiple modular solar panels based on a sun angle with respect to the multiple modular solar panels. In some embodiments, louvering the multiple modular solar panels includes adjusting an angle of the multiple modular solar panels based on at least a wind condition or dust condition with respect to the multiple modular solar panels. In some embodiments, louvering the multiple modular solar panels includes adjusting an angle of the multiple modular solar panels based on at hostile threat to the multiple modular solar panels.
Some embodiments include adjusting a spacing between the multiple modular solar panels utilizing the louvering ties. Some embodiments include rotating the multiple modular solar panels around an axis of the retractable deployer. Some embodiments include louvering the multiple modular solar panels into a retractable configuration and retracting the deployer and multiple modular solar panels. Some embodiments include utilizing the one or more louvering ties as one or more electrical harnesses.
These embodiments may not capture the full extent of combination and permutations of materials and process equipment. However, they may demonstrate the range of applicability of the method, devices, and/or systems. The different embodiments may utilize more or less stages than those described.
It should be noted that the methods, systems, and devices discussed above are intended merely to be examples. It must be stressed that various embodiments may omit, substitute, or add various procedures or components as appropriate. For instance, it should be appreciated that, in alternative embodiments, the methods may be performed in an order different from that described, and that various stages may be added, omitted, or combined. Also, features described with respect to certain embodiments may be combined in various other embodiments. Different aspects and elements of the embodiments may be combined in a similar manner. Also, it should be emphasized that technology evolves and, thus, many of the elements are exemplary in nature and should not be interpreted to limit the scope of the embodiments.
Specific details are given in the description to provide a thorough understanding of the embodiments. However, it will be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art that the embodiments may be practiced without these specific details. For example, well-known circuits, processes, algorithms, structures, and techniques have been shown without unnecessary detail in order to avoid obscuring the embodiments.
Also, it is noted that the embodiments may be described as a process which may be depicted as a flow diagram or block diagram or as stages. Although each may describe the operations as a sequential process, many of the operations can be performed in parallel or concurrently. In addition, the order of the operations may be rearranged. A process may have additional stages not included in the figure.
Having described several embodiments, it will be recognized by those of skill in the art that various modifications, alternative constructions, and equivalents may be used without departing from the spirit of the different embodiments. For example, the above elements may merely be a component of a larger system, wherein other rules may take precedence over or otherwise modify the application of the different embodiments. Also, a number of stages may be undertaken before, during, or after the above elements are considered. Accordingly, the above description should not be taken as limiting the scope of the different embodiments.
This application is a non-provisional patent application claiming priority benefit of U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 62/859,449, filed on Jun. 10, 2019 and entitled “ARTICULATING SOLAR PANEL ENERGY SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND DEVICES,” the entire disclosure of which is herein incorporated by reference for all purposes.
This invention was made with Government support under contract 80NSSC18P1969 awarded by NASA. The Government has certain rights in the invention.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62859449 | Jun 2019 | US |