The embodiments are generally directed to implants for the spine, and in particular to artificial disc replacements.
An artificial disc, also known as artificial disc replacement (ADR), is a medical device implanted into the spine that acts as, or imitates, a spinal disc. Surgeons can replace the entire disc or remove only the nucleus (center of the disc). ADR devices may be designed to allow for motion between the adjacent vertebra, rather than fuse adjacent vertebrae together as occurs in other kinds of spinal implants.
Current ADR systems may impede normal movement in the back and/or neck. For example, some systems allow vertebrae to pivot around a fixed central point but prevent the vertebrae from translating during flexion. Other ADR systems include a mobile core that can slide along one or both endplates. These mobile cores may become displaced from their intended range of motion, or their range of motion may be affected by scarring of the adjacent tissue, which may result in failure of the ADR and/or a limited range of motion. Also, in current ADR systems, the upper and lower endplates may come into contact during flexion and/or extension, thereby requiring the use of high strength materials such as metals. The use of metallic endplates may create unwanted visual artifacts during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the patients spine. These MRI artifacts may make it difficult for a radiologist and/or surgeon to accurately assess the state of the spine or surrounding tissue.
There is a need in the art for a system and method that addresses the shortcomings discussed above.
In one aspect, an artificial disc replacement device includes a first endplate configured to be disposed against a first vertebrae in a spine and a second endplate configured to be disposed against a second vertebrae in the spine. The device also includes a core assembly comprising a core member and a matrix member, where the core member includes a base portion and a curved engaging surface, and where the base portion of the core member is embedded in the matrix member. The first endplate includes a first recess for receiving the curved engaging portion of the core member and the second endplate includes a second recess for receiving the matrix member.
In another aspect, an artificial disc replacement device includes a first endplate configured to be disposed against a first vertebrae in a spine and a second endplate configured to be disposed against a second vertebrae in the spine. The device also includes a core member disposed between the first endplate and the second endplate, the core member having a curved engaging surface for engaging the first endplate. The core member includes a sagittal plane that separates the core member into a first lateral side and a second lateral side. The core member also includes a coronal plane that separates the core member into an anterior side and a posterior side. The curved engaging surface includes a curved boundary that extends within a first plane that is parallel with the sagittal plane. The curved boundary has a first arc radius along an anterior portion disposed on the anterior side of the core member. The curved boundary has a second arc radius along a posterior portion disposed on the posterior side of the curved boundary, where the second arc radius is substantially different from the first arc radius.
In another aspect, an artificial disc replacement device includes a first endplate configured to be disposed against a first vertebrae in a spine and a second endplate configured to be disposed against a second vertebrae in the spine. The device also includes a core member disposed between the first endplate and the second endplate and a matrix member disposed between the first endplate and the second endplate, where the matrix member is in continuous contact with the second endplate. The first endplate includes a recess and where the core member includes a curved engaging surface in continuous contact with the recess. The first endplate can move along the curved engaging surface. The matrix member is disposed between the core member and the second endplate and prevents contact between the core member and the second endplate. The matrix member is positioned to prevent the first endplate from contacting the second endplate as the first endplate moves along the core member.
Other systems, methods, features and advantages of the embodiments will be, or will become, apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art upon examination of the following figures and detailed description. It is intended that all such additional systems, methods, features and advantages be included within this description and this summary, be within the scope of the embodiments, and be protected by the following claims.
The embodiments can be better understood with reference to the following drawings and description. The components in the figures are not necessarily to scale, with emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating the principles of the embodiments. Moreover, in the figures, like reference numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the different views.
The embodiments provide a spinal implant in the form of an artificial disc replacement device, also referred to simply as an ADR device. The ADR device can be implanted between adjacent vertebrae in the spine in order to replace damaged spinal discs. The exemplary ADR device is configured with an upper endplate and a lower endplate that sandwich a core assembly. The core assembly includes a core member that is partially embedded within a matrix member. The core member has a convex upward engaging surface. The upward engaging surface varies in curvature along a sagittal plane to facilitate natural motion between the adjacent vertebrae during flexion and extension. Specifically, the posterior portion of the core member has a smaller arc radius (and correspondingly, a larger curvature) than the anterior portion of the core member. This helps limit compression during extension and increases compression and forward translation of the upper endplate during flexion. The upward engaging surface has an approximately constant curvature along a coronal plane to facilitate symmetric lateral bending in either lateral directions.
The exemplary device also uses a matrix member that is less rigid than the core member, thereby improving cushioning and shock absorption. The matrix member may also extend upward from the lower endplate to engage the upper endplate during flexion and extension, thereby preventing the endplates from contacting one another. As the endplates never contact one another they can be constructed from materials other than metal. For example, the endplates may be constructed of ceramic or carbon materials that provide better biocompatibility with vertebra, improved wear characteristics and different degrees of strength compared to metal materials. Additionally, using ceramic or carbon materials may limit or eliminate MRI artifacts that can be caused by using metallic endplates.
It may be appreciated that the ADR device described in this detailed description and in the claims may be used within any suitable portion of the spine. The embodiment of
For purposes of clarity, reference is made to various directional adjectives throughout the detailed description and in the claims. As used herein, the term “anterior” refers to a side or portion of an implant that is intended to be oriented towards, or disposed closer to, the front of the human body when the implant has been placed in the body. Likewise, the term “posterior” refers to a side or portion of an implant that is intended to be oriented towards, or disposed closer to, the back of the human body following implantation. Moreover, the posterior side and the anterior side of a body (or part) may be separated by a coronal plane (also known as a frontal plane).
In addition, the term “superior” refers to a side or portion of an implant that is intended to be oriented towards a top (e.g., the head) of the body while “inferior” refers to a side or portion of an implant that is intended to be oriented towards a bottom of the body. Moreover, the superior side and inferior side of the body may be separated by a transverse plane.
Reference is also made herein to “lateral” sides or portions of an implant, which are sides or portions facing along a lateral direction of the body. These lateral sides may be separated by a sagittal plane.
Referring to
First endplate 220 may be configured to engage a first vertebra (for example, first vertebra 110 of
Second endplate 230 may be configured to engage a second vertebra (for example, second vertebra 112 of
Although the embodiments depict endplates with domes and/or teeth for engaging vertebrae, in other embodiments any other suitable provisions for attaching endplates to vertebrae could be used. Exemplary mechanisms include, but are not limited to: screws, rods, nails, and blades. In such embodiments, the endplates may be suitably modified to receive at least part of the fastening mechanism. For example, an endplate could include holes for receiving screws.
ADR device 100 may also include a core assembly 250 that is disposed between first endplate 220 and second endplate 230. Core assembly 250 of ADR device 100 may itself comprise two distinct members. Specifically, core assembly 250 comprises a core member 252 and a matrix member 254. Core member 252 further includes a base portion 260 and a curved engaging surface 262. As shown in
First endplate 220 may include a recess 224 that receives curved engaging surface 262 of core member 252. As described in further detail below, recess 224 may be sized and shaped to receive different portions of curved engaging surface 262, allowing first endplate 220 to tilt and translate along curved engaging surface 262 so as to facilitate natural motions between adjacent vertebra during flexion, extension, and lateral bending. In the exemplary embodiment shown in
Second endplate 230 may include a recess 234 that receives matrix member 254. Recess 234 may be bounded by an outer wall or lip 235. In some embodiments, recess 234 is sized and dimensioned to tightly fit matrix member 254 so that, once inserted, matrix member 254 cannot be easily dislodged from recess 234. However, in other embodiments, matrix member 254 can be fixed within recess 234 using a suitable fastener and/or biocompatible adhesive.
Vertebral bodies are comprised of two distinct types of tissue: cortical bone and cancellous bone. The cancellous bone is disposed more centrally within the vertebral body, which is surrounded by an outer layer of cortical bone. At the superior and inferior ends of the vertebral body, the cortical bone forms a raised lip (or cortical rim) around the cancellous bone. Because the rim of cortical bone is denser and generally stronger than the interior cancellous bone, the endplates of the present embodiments are shaped to increase engagement with the cortical rim. Specifically, first endplate 220 and second endplate 230 both have approximately rectangular shapes with rounded corners. This geometry helps ensure that the endplates are supported, at least in part, by the cortical rim of each vertebral body.
Although the embodiments depict endplates with an approximately rectangular geometry, in other embodiments the outer perimeter of each endplate may be varied to approximately match the geometry of the cortical rim of the associated vertebral body. Thus, in some cases, endplates could have a curved front edge that matches the approximate geometry of the anterior lip of the associated vertebral body. Likewise, in some cases, endplates could have lateral and/or posterior edges that match the approximate geometries of the lateral and/or posterior portions of the cortical rim.
Core member 252 and matrix member 254 may be made of substantially different materials. In some embodiments, core member 252 may be made of a more rigid material than matrix member 254. Also, matrix member 254 may be made of a substantially more compressible material than core member 252. For example, as seen in
Embedding part of core member 252 within a more flexible and/or compressible matrix material allows for cushioning and shock absorption within ADR device 100. Furthermore, this configuration allows core member 252 to “float” within matrix member 254, thereby providing some relative movement between core member 252 and second endplate 230 (see
In different embodiments, a variety of suitable materials could be used for the components of an ADR device. Suitable materials for a core member include, but are not limited to: metallic materials, plastic materials, and/or ceramic materials. Suitable materials for a matrix member include, but are not limited to: plastics and gels. Suitable materials for endplates include, but are not limited to: metallic materials, plastics, and/or ceramics. In one exemplary embodiment, a core member could be comprised of a polyether ether ketone (PEEK) material. Also, in one embodiment, a matrix member could be comprised of a suitably flexible gel. Additionally, in one embodiment, one or both endplates could be comprised of a suitable ceramic material.
The embodiments provide an artificial disc replacement that facilitates natural motion between vertebra. This is accomplished, in part, by the geometry of the core member, which has a curvature that varies over different regions. In particular, the curvature may vary between the posterior and anterior sides of the core member. That is, the radius of curvature changes from the posterior end to the anterior end.
The posterior and anterior portions may be associated with different degrees of curvature. In this description and in the claims, the curvature of a surface may be characterized by its radius of curvature, or arc radius. The arc radius of an arc, for example, is the radius of the circle of which the arc is a part. Moreover, the curvature of a local portion of a surface is inversely proportional to the associated arc radius of that local portion. In particular, a larger arc radius is associated with a smaller degree of curvature, while a smaller arc radius is associated with a larger degree of curvature.
As seen in
In some embodiments, the arc radius of curved boundary 720 may gradually change between first arc radius 730 to second arc radius 732. This may occur within a transition portion 740 that is intermediate to posterior portion 710 and anterior portion 712. In some cases, the arc radius could vary smoothly from first arc radius 730 to second arc radius 732. In other cases, however, the arc radius could abruptly change.
In different embodiments, the relative sizes of each arc radius could vary. That is, their ratios could vary. In some embodiments, the ratio of the first arc radius to the second arc radius could vary in the range approximately between 1:2 and 9:10. In some embodiments, the ratio of the first arc radius to the second arc radius could be approximately 3:4. It may be appreciated that the ratio of the arc radii of the posterior and anterior ends may be suitably changed to accommodate different intended ranges of motion in different portions of the spine. For example, the ratio could have one value for implants used in the cervical spine and another ratio for implants used in the lumbar spine.
Additionally, the absolute sizes of each arc radius could vary in different embodiments. In some embodiments, the first arc radius could have a value approximately in the range between 4 and 6 centimeters. In one embodiment, the first arc radius could have a value of approximately 4.5 centimeters. In some embodiments, the second arc radius could have a value approximately in the range between 5 and 7 centimeters. In one embodiment, the first arc radius could have a value of approximately 6 centimeters. It may be appreciated that the absolute values of the arc radii of the posterior and anterior ends may be suitably changed to accommodate different intended ranges of motion in different portions of the spine. For example, the arc radii could have one set of value for implants used in the cervical spine and another set of values for implants used in the lumbar spine.
As seen in
In some embodiments, arc radius 830 may be substantially smaller than first arc radius 730 and second arc radius 732 (see
By using a core member with a curved engaging surface that has different arc radii in different regions, the implant described herein provides for natural motion between adjacent vertebra. In particular, the embodiments described herein allow the top endplate to tilt and slide forwards along the core member during forward flexion. Additionally, the embodiments help limit the tilting and rearward motion of the top endplate along the core member during rearward extension.
In embodiments where the width of a core member varies between the posterior and anterior ends, the arc radius of the outer boundary of the curved engaging surface could vary. However, in other embodiments, the arc radius of the outer boundary of the curved engaging surface could be substantially constant from the posterior end to the lateral end.
The present embodiments provide an ADR device that facilitates both translation and rotation of the upper endplate relative to the lower endplate without requiring the use of a core that can slide relative to either of the endplates. Instead, the curvature of the core member (including posterior and anterior ends with different arc radii) allow the center axis of rotation of the upper endplate to translate along the core member. This translation is depicted schematically in, for example,
In
In
Though matrix member 1008 may compress somewhat, depending on the amount of force applied by first end plate 1002, matrix member 1008 nonetheless acts to limit the rearward motion of first end plate 1002. Matrix member 1008 may also provide some cushioning and shock absorption following the initial contact between first end plate 1002 and matrix member 1008.
As seen in
In
In
As seen in
Using a configuration in which the upper endplate can not only tilt but also translate in the anterior direction relative to the lower endplate allows the adjacent vertebrae to achieve the necessary degree of compression so that a patient's neck can move through the entire range of normal motion, including putting his chin against his chest. Moreover, using a relatively less rigid matrix member provides shock absorption during flexion and prevents the upper endplate from coming into contact with the lower endplate. Thus, the present ADR device acts to provide an increased range of motion in the neck during flexion and a more limited range of motion in the next during extension, accommodating the natural motions of the neck.
As already described above, the embodiments not only control the motion of the upper endplate so as to mimic the natural motion of two adjacent vertebrae, but the presence of the softer matrix member substantially eliminates contact between the upper and lower endplates. Typically, endplates must be constructed from high strength materials such as metals that can withstand large contact forces as the endplates collide during flexion and/or extension. Since the current design eliminates contact between the endplates, the endplates can be manufactured from non-metallic materials. For example, in some embodiments, the endplates could be manufactured from plastic materials and/or ceramic materials that provide better biocompatibility with vertebra, improved wear characteristics and different degrees of strength compared to metal materials. Moreover, the use of non-metallic materials in the ADR device may substantially reduce or eliminate the metallic artifacts that may arise in MRIs when metallic prosthetics are present in the spine.
In different embodiments, the size and/or relative position of a dome on an upper endplate can vary. For example,
In
Embodiments can include additional provisions to prevent contact between opposing endplates in an ADR device. In some embodiments, a matrix member can be shaped to extend radially outward over the lower endplate so that no portion of the lower endplate is exposed on a superior side.
The exemplary ADR device can be implanted into a patient's spine using a suitable surgical method. In some embodiments, after removing some or all of the tissue between adjacent vertebrae, a surgeon may first implant the upper and lower endplates. For example, the surgeon may place the lower endplate against one vertebra. In cases where the lower endplate includes teeth or similar provisions, the surgeon may apply pressure and/or tap the endplate to that the teeth engage the vertebra and prevent the lower endplate from moving with respect to the vertebra. The upper endplate may also be placed against the opposing vertebra. Specifically, an upper endplate with a suitable dome for engaging a concave area in the vertebra can be selected. As described above, a surgeon could choose from at least endplates with domes that are either centrally or posteriorly located. Also, a surgeon could choose from at least endplates with domes that have different overall heights. Once a suitable endplate has been selected, the endplate can be inserted and placed against the vertebra so that the dome engages the concave area of vertebra.
Once the endplates have been positioned and/or fixed in place, a surgeon may insert a core assembly comprising both a core member and a matrix member. To insert the core assembly, the surgeon can insert the matrix member into a corresponding recess of the lower endplate while simultaneously inserting a portion of the core member into a corresponding recess of the upper endplate. Once the core member has been inserted, the compressive forces of the spine may act to keep the matrix member fixed in the recess of the lower endplate and the core member engaged with the recess of the upper endplate.
While various embodiments have been described, the description is intended to be exemplary, rather than limiting, and it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that many more embodiments and implementations are possible that are within the scope of the embodiments. Although many possible combinations of features are shown in the accompanying figures and discussed in this detailed description, many other combinations of the disclosed features are possible. Any feature of any embodiment may be used in combination with, or substituted for, any other feature or element in any other embodiment unless specifically restricted. Therefore, it will be understood that any of the features shown and/or discussed in the present disclosure may be implemented together in any suitable combination. Accordingly, the embodiments are not to be restricted except in light of the attached claims and their equivalents. Also, various modifications and changes may be made within the scope of the attached claims.
This application claims the benefit of Provisional Patent Application No. 62/702,686 filed Dec. 4, 2019, and titled “Artificial Disc Replacement Device,” which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5401269 | Buttner-Janz et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5888226 | Rogozinski | Mar 1999 | A |
6402785 | Zdeblick et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6648917 | Gerbec | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6682562 | Viart et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6964686 | Gordon | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7011684 | Eckman | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7022139 | Errico et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7118599 | Errico et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7160327 | Errico et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7217291 | Zucherman et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7223291 | Errico et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7267688 | Ferree | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7326250 | Beaurain et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7331994 | Gordon et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
RE40260 | Buhler | Apr 2008 | E |
7442211 | de Villiers et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7481840 | Zucherman et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7491241 | Errico et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7517363 | Rogers et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7563284 | Coppes et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7563286 | Gerber et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7621956 | Paul et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7641666 | Paul et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7690381 | Bartish, Jr. et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7695516 | Zeegers | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7708777 | O'Neil et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7731753 | Reo et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7771479 | Humphreys et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7811326 | Braddock, Jr. et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7842089 | Aaron | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7909877 | Krueger et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7927374 | Duggal et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7951200 | Heinz | May 2011 | B2 |
7963994 | Biedermann et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8002835 | Zeegers | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8038713 | Ferree | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8038716 | Duggal et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8100974 | Duggal et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8118873 | Humphreys et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8142505 | Tauber | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8152850 | Copf, Jr. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8163023 | Nguyen et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8172902 | Kapitan et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8241360 | Bao et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8366775 | Errico et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8382843 | Laurence et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8425606 | Cowan | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8496713 | Bennett et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8535379 | Moskowitz et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8545564 | Errico et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8613771 | Hansell et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8679181 | Lechmann et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8728163 | Theofilos et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8747471 | Albans et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8882842 | Bergagnoli | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8998990 | Bertagnoli et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9005290 | Morrison, III | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9011493 | Zappacosta et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9011544 | Arramon et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9017410 | Hansell et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9066809 | Hansell et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9101485 | Berger et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9125753 | Caballes | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9138329 | McCombe et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9198697 | Zappacosta | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9198770 | Balasubramanian et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9237958 | Duggal | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9308101 | Doty | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9468537 | Cowan | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9486251 | Zappacosta et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9642718 | Sournac et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
10039575 | Fortin et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10307263 | Dzioba | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10376385 | Gray et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
11197765 | Bray, Jr. | Dec 2021 | B2 |
20030233097 | Ferree | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233148 | Ferree | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040030390 | Ferree | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040044410 | Ferree | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040059318 | Zhang | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040127991 | Ferree | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040148027 | Errico | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040186577 | Ferree | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050027364 | Kim | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050038515 | Kunzler | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050085911 | Link | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050149189 | Mokhtar et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050165407 | Diaz | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050171610 | Humphreys et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050234553 | Gordon | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060020341 | Schneid et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060069438 | Zucherman et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069441 | Zucherman et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060089656 | Allard | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060116768 | Krueger et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060136063 | Zeegers | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060149371 | Marik et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060235524 | Petit et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060235528 | Buettner-Janz | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070050030 | Kim | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070050032 | Gittings et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070100456 | Dooris | May 2007 | A1 |
20070162137 | Kloss | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070168037 | Posnick | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070209222 | Fischer | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070270631 | Nelson | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080015699 | Voydeville | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080065216 | Hurlbert et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080114453 | Francis | May 2008 | A1 |
20080161924 | Viker | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183204 | Greenhalgh | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080195206 | Chee et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080215156 | Duggal | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090005872 | Moumene | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090210059 | McCombe | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100082110 | Belliard | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100241231 | Marino | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100292801 | Hansell | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110125270 | Paul | May 2011 | A1 |
20110202135 | Baek | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110257748 | Liu | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110264223 | Lemaire et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20140236297 | Iott | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20150018952 | Ali | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150039089 | Balasubramanian | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150196399 | Hansell et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20170202676 | Muhlbrauer | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20190008651 | Doty | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190231550 | Dzioba | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190254721 | Zappacosta | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190254834 | Balasubramanian et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
20310432 | Oct 2003 | DE |
BO20100597 | Apr 2012 | IT |
WO 03084449 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO 2004016217 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO 2005032431 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO 2006016384 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO 2008010240 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO 2009118691 | Oct 2009 | WO |
2018114334 | Jun 2018 | WO |
WO 2018114334 | Jun 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Office Action dated Mar. 2, 2021 in U.S. Appl. No. 16/702,686. |
Office Action dated May 19, 2023 in U.S. Appl. No. 17/526,047. |
International Search Report dated May 25, 2021 in PCT/US2020/062590. |
Office Action dated Feb. 21, 2023 in U.S. Appl. No. 17/156,179. |
Extended European Search Report dated Dec. 15, 2023 in European Application No. 20895258.0-1122. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220071775 A1 | Mar 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16702686 | Dec 2019 | US |
Child | 17526047 | US |