Patent Grant
7201776
This invention relates generally to surgical techniques and prosthetic components therefor and, in particular, to intervertebral disc replacement apparatus and methods of implanting the same.
Eighty-five percent of the population will experience low back pain at some point. Fortunately, the majority of people recover from their back pain with a combination of benign neglect, rest, exercise, medication, physical therapy, or chiropractic care. A small percent of the population will suffer chronic low back pain. The cost of treatment of patients with spinal disorders plus the patient's lost productivity is estimated at 25 to 100 billion dollars annually.
Seven cervical (neck), 12 thoracic, and 5 lumbar (low back) vertebrae form the normal human spine. Intervertebral discs reside between adjacent vertebra with two exceptions. First, the articulation between the first two cervical vertebrae does not contain a disc. Second, a disc lies between the last lumbar vertebra and the sacrum (a portion of the pelvis).
The spine supports the body, and protects the spinal cord and nerves. The vertebrae of the spine are also supported by ligaments, tendons, and muscles which allow movement (flexion, extension, lateral bending, and rotation). Motion between vertebrae occurs through the disc and two facet joints. The disc lies in the front or anterior portion of the spine. The facet joints lie laterally on either side of the posterior portion of the spine.
The human intervertebral disc is an oval to kidney bean shaped structure of variable size depending on the location in the spine. The outer portion of the disc is known as the annulus fibrosis. The annulus is formed of 10 to 60 fibrous bands. The fibers in the bands alternate their direction of orientation by 30 degrees between each band. The orientation serves to control vertebral motion (one half of the bands tighten to check motion when the vertebra above or below the disc are turned in either direction).
The annulus contains the nucleus. The nucleus pulpous serves to transmit and dampen axial loads. A high water content (70–80 percent) assists the nucleus in this function. The water content has a diurnal variation. The nucleus imbibes water while a person lies recumbent. Activity squeezes fluid from the disc. Nuclear material removed from the body and placed into water will imbibe water swelling to several times its normal size. The nucleus comprises roughly 50 percent of the entire disc. The nucleus contains cells (chondrocytes and fibrocytes) and proteoglycans (chondroitin sulfate and keratin sulfate). The cell density in the nucleus is on the order of 4,000 cells per micro liter.
Interestingly, the adult disc is the largest avascular structure in the human body. Given the lack of vascularity, the nucleus is not exposed to the body's immune system. Most cells in the nucleus obtain their nutrition and fluid exchange through diffusion from small blood vessels in adjacent vertebra.
The disc changes with aging. As a person ages the water content of the disc falls from approximately 85 percent at birth to 70 percent in the elderly. The ratio of chondroitin sulfate to keratin sulfate decreases with age. The ratio of chondroitin 6 sulfate to chondroitin 4 sulfate increases with age. The distinction between the annulus and the nucleus decreases with age. These changes are known as disc degeneration. Generally disc degeneration is painless.
Premature or accelerated disc degeneration is known as degenerative disc disease. A large portion of patients suffering from chronic low back pain are thought to have this condition. As the disc degenerates, the nucleus and annulus functions are compromised. The nucleus becomes thinner and less able to handle compression loads. The annulus fibers become redundant as the nucleus shrinks. The redundant annular fibers are less effective in controlling vertebral motion. The disc pathology can result in: 1) bulging of the annulus into the spinal cord or nerves; 2) narrowing of the space between the vertebra where the nerves exit; 3) tears of the annulus as abnormal loads are transmitted to the annulus and the annulus is subjected to excessive motion between vertebra; and 4) disc herniation or extrusion of the nucleus through complete annular tears.
Current surgical treatments of disc degeneration are destructive. One group of procedures removes the nucleus or a portion of the nucleus; lumbar discectomy falls in this category. A second group of procedures destroy nuclear material; Chymopapin (an enzyme) injection, laser discectomy, and thermal therapy (heat treatment to denature proteins) fall in this category. A third group, spinal fusion procedures either remove the disc or the disc's function by connecting two or more vertebra together with bone. These destructive procedures lead to acceleration of disc degeneration. The first two groups of procedures compromise the treated disc. Fusion procedures transmit additional stress to the adjacent discs. The additional stress results in premature disc degeneration of the adjacent discs.
Prosthetic disc replacement offers many advantages. The prosthetic disc attempts to eliminate a patient's pain while preserving the disc's function. Current prosthetic disc implants, however, either replace the nucleus or the nucleus and the annulus. Both types of current procedures remove the degenerated disc component to allow room for the prosthetic component. Although the use of resilient materials has been proposed, the need remains for further improvements in the way in which prosthetic components are incorporated into the disc space, and in materials to ensure strength and longevity. Such improvements are necessary, since the prosthesis may be subjected to 100,000,000 compression cycles over the life of the implant.
This invention resides in an artificial disc replacement (ADR) configured for placement between upper and lower vertebrae. The ADR broadly includes a pair of opposing endplate components, each attached to one of the upper and lower vertebrae, a cushioning component disposed between the endplate components; and a filler material contained within the cushioning component. The filler material may be a gas, liquid, foam, or gel, including a hydrogel.
One or both of the endplate components may include a modified surface to increase adherence to the respective vertebral endplates. Such surface modification may include spikes, barbs or other projections, and/or pores or roughening conducive to bony ingrowth. As a further alternative, the modified surface may include one or more projections introduced externally and advanced to penetrate at least a portion of a respective vertebral endplate. According to yet a different option, the modified surface may include deployable projections with retaining rings used to hold the projections together until forced into the vertebrae, at which time the projections spread apart.
In a preferred embodiment, the ADR may further include one or more opposing, spaced-apart projections configured to impinge if the endplate components are subjected to an excessive force. Such projections may allow for unrestricted motion between the endplates until impingement, or may restrict translation between the endplates until a greater excessive force is reached.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,419,704 discloses artificial replacements for natural intervertebral discs in humans and animals. Broadly, a shaped body assumes a final volume sized to consume at least a portion of the intervertebral disc space, and a material associated with the shaped body enabling the body to cyclically compress and expand in a manner similar to the disc material being replaced. The body may be composed of a compressible material, such as polymeric urethane or other suitable elastomers, or may include a filling to impart an appropriate level of compressibility. The superior and inferior surfaces may be convex, and may further include grooves, spikes, or other protrusions to maintain the body within the intervertebral space. The body may further be wedge-shaped to help restore or maintain lordosis, particularly if the prosthesis is introduced into the cervical or lumbar regions of the spine.
To enhance strength or longevity, the body may further include the use of fiber-reinforced materials on one or more outer surfaces or wall structures, as the case may be. Similar to commercial tire construction, such fiber-reinforced materials may be of a bias-ply, radial-ply or bias-belted construction. According to one configuration, an artificial disc according to the invention may further include an outer compressible member peripherally attached to a central “hub,” similar, at least in concept, to the which a tire is mounted onto a wheel.
The instant invention extends the teachings of the '704 patent through the addition of metal endplates and/or bone-ingrowth surfaces. Although the invention is described in terms of artificial disc replacement (ADR), the approach may also be used to dampen other artificial joints within the body, such as the tibial component of a knee replacement.
As noted in the '704 patent, the ADR may be filled with a gas, liquid, gel (including hydrogels), foam or other compressible material, and the material may be introduced or otherwise provided through the use of a valve, port, syringe, or, alternatively, by way of valveless means. The body in this case is preferably a sealed unit, and may include self-sealing means in the event of a leak or rupture.
If a valve is used to inflate the ADR, it may be configured so as to be accessible during implantation, enabling the surgeon to expand the device in situ. A valve may also be provided in the form of a port enabling subcutaneous post-operative inflation or re-expansion. If a hydrogel is used as the filler material, it may introduced within the body in a dehydrated state prior to implantation, with water being added to expand the material. The liquid may be added through a valve, port or hypodermic in conjunction within a sealed structure or, alternatively, at least a portion of the surface of the body, preferably the superior end or inferior surfaces, may be at least semi-porous. As a further alternative to a valveless structure, one or more reactants may be provided with the body, such that when mixed with one or more other reactants, a gas or foam is generated to expand and fill the body. As yet a further alternative, an ampule or cartridge operative to release a compressed gas or generate a gas, liquid or foam may be activated by an external source of energy such as ultrasound, heat, or other stimuli.
Turning now to the drawings,
Alternatively, metal projections may be used to restrict motion—translation, for example—before enough axial load is applied to the ADR to force the projections together tightly. In either case, when the load on the ADR exceeds a certain amount, for example 350 P.S.I. the metal projections may be used to carry the additional load.
In terms of operative procedure, disc replacements according to the invention may be introduced through an anterior, posterior, or lateral approach using an appropriate surgical technique, including open, arthroscopic, laparoscopic, or microscope-assisted procedures. The vertebrae may also be distracted, or the prosthesis may be cooled to ease implantation. More than one ADR according to the invention may be introduced into the same disc space, and may be arranged side-by-side laterally, or anterior to posterior. Separate flaps may be formed in the annulus fibrosis, and one or more bodies may be introduced and inflated, or allowed to expand, to at least partially distract the vertebrae to ease the insertion of additional bodies.
The material of the annulus fibrosis may be reattached to maintain the disc replacement material, or synthetic bands, fabrics, or plates may be added, as required. In the event that multiple prostheses are used within a common disc space, the bodies may include interlocking shapes or structures of varying design to enhance their physical cooperation. In addition, if the replacements are arranged from anterior to posterior, devices more posterior may be smaller or of a lesser “durometer,” or those placed anteriorally may be larger or less compressible (or both), again, to enhance an overall lordotic shape. Finally, in all of the embodiments disclosed herein and in the parent applications hereto, septae may be added in the where the air, liquid, or gel is disposed to strengthen the structure.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/191,639, filed Jul. 9, 2002; which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/415,382, filed Oct. 8, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,419,704, and Ser. No. 09/580,231, filed May 26, 2000 U.S. Pat. No. 6,494,883; the entire content of each application and patent being incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2677369 | Knowles | May 1954 | A |
| 3366975 | Pangman | Feb 1968 | A |
| 3426364 | Lumb | Feb 1969 | A |
| 3551560 | Thiele | Dec 1970 | A |
| 3593342 | Niebauer | Jul 1971 | A |
| 3648294 | Shahrestani | Mar 1972 | A |
| 3855638 | Pilliar | Dec 1974 | A |
| 3867728 | Stubstad et al. | Feb 1975 | A |
| 3875595 | Froning | Apr 1975 | A |
| 3883902 | Lynch | May 1975 | A |
| 4229839 | Schwemmer | Oct 1980 | A |
| 4309777 | Patil | Jan 1982 | A |
| 4349921 | Kuntz | Sep 1982 | A |
| 4657550 | Daher | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4663358 | Hyon et al. | May 1987 | A |
| 4707872 | Hessel | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4714469 | Kenna | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4759766 | Buettner-Janz et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4772287 | Ray et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
| 4863477 | Monson | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4874389 | Downey | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4878915 | Brantigan | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4904260 | Ray et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4911718 | Lee et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4917704 | Frey et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4932969 | Frey et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4946378 | Hirayama et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
| 5002576 | Furhmann et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5015247 | Michelson | May 1991 | A |
| 5026373 | Ray et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5035716 | Downey | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5047055 | Bao et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5071437 | Steffee | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5108438 | Stone | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5123926 | Pisharodi | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5171280 | Baumgartner | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5171281 | Parsons et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5192326 | Bao et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5192327 | Brantigan | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5246458 | Graham | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5258031 | Salib et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5258043 | Stone | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5292332 | Lee | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5314477 | Marnay | May 1994 | A |
| 5320644 | Baumgartner | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5336223 | Rogers | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5370697 | Baumgartner | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5375823 | Navas | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5401269 | Buttner-Janz et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5425773 | Boyd et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5458642 | Beer | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5464421 | Wortrich | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5514180 | Heggeness et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5534028 | Bao et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5534030 | Navarro et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5545229 | Parsons et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5556431 | Buttner-Jan | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5571192 | Schonhoffer | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5609635 | Michelson | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5645565 | Rudd et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5645596 | Kim et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5645597 | Krapiva | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5674294 | Bainville et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5674296 | Bryan et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5683465 | Shinn et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5693100 | Pisharodi | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5702450 | Bisserie | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5702455 | Saggar | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5711960 | Shikinami | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5716416 | Lin | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5800549 | Bao et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5814084 | Grivas et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5824093 | Ray et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5824094 | Serhan et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5865845 | Thalgott | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5865846 | Bryan et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5888226 | Rogozinski | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5893889 | Harrington | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5899941 | Nishijima et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5906616 | Pavlov et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5928284 | Mehdizadeh | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5964807 | Gan et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5976186 | Bao et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6022376 | Assell et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6045554 | Grooms et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6090112 | Zucherman et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6110210 | Norton et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6113639 | Ray et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6132465 | Ray et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6146420 | McKay | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6187048 | Milner et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6200347 | Anderson et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6214050 | Huene | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6245072 | Zdeblick et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6261586 | McKay | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6270528 | McKay | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6375682 | Fleischmann et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6402785 | Zdeblick et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6419704 | Ferree | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6494883 | Ferree | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6533818 | Weber et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 20010020186 | Boyce et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20010034553 | Michelson | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010039458 | Boyer II et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010056302 | Boyer II et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020026244 | Trieu | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20030074076 A1 | Apr 2003 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 10191639 | Jul 2002 | US |
| Child | 10303385 | US | |
| Parent | 09415382 | Oct 1999 | US |
| Child | 10191639 | US | |
| Parent | 09580231 | May 2000 | US |
| Child | 09415382 | US |
