The present invention generally relates to an artificial nipple for use with a bottle for the purpose of feeding, such as an infant.
The merits of breast-feeding are well documented in the scientific literature. A number of advantages have been noted which include nutritional, immunological, psychological and other general health advantages. A list of the merits of human breast milk as compared to artificial feed or formula would include ideal nutritional content, better absorption, fewer food related allergies, more favorable psychological development, better immunological defenses, and a substantial economic advantage. Another benefit to exclusive breast-feeding includes positive effects on development of an infant's oral cavity resulting in proper alignment of teeth and other related benefits.
For various reasons, however, exclusive breast-feeding is not always possible. An example of this would be where a nursing mother cannot produce enough breast milk to feed her infant. In such cases, an artificial feed may be used to supplement breast-feeding. A nursing mother returning to work may employ a breast pump to express milk to be given to her infant at a later time. In the event that an infant is fed with an artificial formula or previously expressed breast milk, it is conventional that a bottle provided with an artificial nipple is used to feed the infant.
The mechanical aspects of breast-feeding are significantly different compared to that of bottle-feeding. In breast-fed babies, the tongue action appears to be of rolling or peristaltic motion. However, the tongue action for bottle-fed babies is often considered to be more piston-like or a squeezing motion. In order to stop the abundant flow of milk from a bottle with an artificial nipple having a large hole in the end, infants might be forced to hold the tongue up against the hole of the nipple to prevent the formula from gushing forth. This abnormal activity of the tongue is referred to as tongue thrust or deviate swallow. When breast-fed babies are not sucking or swallowing, they may rest with the nipple moderately indented by the tongue, while bottle-fed babies rest with the teat expanded, i.e., indenting the tongue. The differences between the tongue movements and rest position of the tongue and breast-fed and bottle-fed babies are probably due to the properties of the artificial nipple.
The undesirable effects of existing artificial nipples are often permanent and correction later in life is difficult due at least in part to effected muscle development. The shape of a breast nipple is dictated by the internal geometry of the infant's mouth during breast-feeding. However, an artificial teat is already formed with a specific shape and is made from a material stiffer than breast tissue.
Recent research suggests that in the early stages of oral cavity development, the palette is almost as malleable as softened wax. As a result, children who are bottle-fed are nearly twice as likely to have malocclusions as children who are breast-fed. In the same way that finger sucking and use of a pacifier-like object has been found to increase the prevalence of malocclusions it is now believed that use of a conventional artificial nipple also impacts negatively upon formation of the oral cavity.
A demand therefore exists for an artificial nipple that more closely mimics that of a natural breast and reduces or eliminates the impact of bottle-feeding with respect to oral development. The present invention is believed to satisfy this demand.
An object of the invention is to provide an artificial nipple that is made of a material that minimally impacts infant oral development. Another object of the invention is to provide an artificial nipple that permits milk to flow therefrom at typical breast-feeding suction levels. Yet another object of the invention is to provide an artificial nipple that does not permit milk to flow through or substantially stops that flow when compressed, or constricted radially through elongation. Still yet another object of the invention is to provide an artificial nipple that is positioned in the oral cavity in a similar fashion as that of a mother's nipple. Another object of the invention is to provide an artificial nipple that permits milk or other fluids to flow therefrom in a manner and rate similar to that of a mother's nipple.
Overall, the nipple of the present invention is designed in one broad sense to encourage a suck/swallow/breathe pattern similar to that of natural breastfeeding. This reduces or eliminates the undesired forcing of breast milk to a feeding infant.
In one aspect of the present invention, a baby feeding apparatus includes a substantially solid nipple with one or more ducts formed therethrough for conveying fluids through the nipple. The nipple is radially compressible so as to prevent passage of fluids through the one or more ducts when so compressed. Similarly, the nipple constricts radially so as to prevent passage of fluids when elongated (stretched).
In a particular aspect of the foregoing invention, the nipple may be a Shore A hardness of less than about 10, and even below 1. More particularly, on the Shore 00 scale, a range of about 20 to about 45 is presently considered most desirable. The nipple may include three or more elongated ducts. The fluid ducts may further be offset radially with respect to a central axis of the nipple in another variation. Further still, the end openings of the ducts can be radially offset relative to the central axis of the ducts themselves.
In one embodiment, the nipple may include a unitary nipple portion and mounting portion. The mounting portion may be formed of a material having the same Shore A hardness as that of the nipple portion, but in this embodiment, the mounting portion may be formed of a material having a relatively higher Shore A hardness to that of the nipple portion. This provides a more rigid structure for attachment to a container, for instance.
In another form, the nipple may include a nipple end and a body portion. The body portion may include a vent formed therethrough, or multiple vents. The vent may include a horizontal passageway in communication with atmosphere, and a vertical passageway in communication at a first end to the horizontal passageway and at a second end to an inner chamber of the nipple.
Another aspect of the invention provides a baby feeding apparatus including a substantially solid nipple being formed of a material having a Shore A hardness of less than about 10, and one or more ducts at or near the nipple tip for conveying fluids through the nipple, and most preferably extending through the generally solid nipple portion.
Yet another aspect of the invention provides a baby feeding apparatus including a substantially solid nipple having one or more ducts formed therethrough for conveying fluids through the nipple, and a flow restrictive feature. One flow restrictive feature prevents passage of fluids through the one or more ducts when the nipple is one or both of radially compressed and axially extended. Another is just the small size of the terminal hole at the end of a duct as disclosed herein, which is sufficient alone to restrict fluid flow, as well as the use of a valve or valve-like end feature. It has been observed that these flow restrictive features reduce the amount of air that could otherwise return to the fluid container. With the vented structure disclosed herein, this serves to prevent the infant (user) from taking in unwanted air with feeding. The ducts may be round in cross-section. In another embodiment, the ducts may terminate in longitudinal slits. In yet another embodiment, the ducts may terminate in “S”-shaped slits or “Y”-shaped slits.
Yet another aspect of the invention provides an integral (one-piece) nursing nipple including a substantially solid nipple formed of a material having a Shore A hardness of less than about 10, and a container attachment portion formed to be unitary with the nipple portion.
Yet another aspect of the invention provides an integral nursing nipple including a substantially solid nipple portion formed of a material having a Shore A hardness of less than about 10, and an extending elongated portion sized and shaped to be insertable into the mouth of a nursing infant. The extending portion includes a proximal portion and a base portion and one or more ducts through the solid nipple portion from the proximal portion to the base portion. The base portion has a radial flange extending outwardly therefrom, and a container attachment portion formed to be unitary with the nipple portion. The container attachment portion is generally cylindrical, and has a first end connected to the radial flange and a second end. The second end includes an internal groove formed about an internal periphery thereof. The internal groove is sized and shaped so as to be removably attachable to a container having a matching thread (although this mating thread and groove arrangement could be reversed).
Yet another aspect of the present invention provides an integral nursing nipple including a substantially solid nipple formed of a material having a Shore A hardness of less than about 10, and an extending portion sized and shaped to be insertable into the mouth of a nursing infant. The extending portion includes one or more ducts extending therethrough for conveying fluids, and a base portion. A container attachment portion is attached to the base portion. The container attachment portion is generally cylindrical and has a first end with a flange. The flange extends inwardly from the first end and includes a plurality of openings formed therethrough. In manufacture the soft base portion enmeshes with the flange through the openings. The container attachment portion includes means for attachment to a container, such as screw threads, a snap-fit, etc.
Another aspect of one embodiment of the invention is to provide as low a Durometer material for the nipple portion of the artificial nipple as possible. Preferably, a relatively higher durometer material is provided for the collar portion. The nipple portion may be molded or connected directly to the collar or mounting portion or may be a more conventional nipple/collar configuration.
Still another aspect of an embodiment of the invention is the positioning of a valve at the distal end of each duct to regulate the flow of fluids through each duct. The valve is designed to open and close depending on the suckling action.
One of the most significant attributes of the present invention is nonetheless considered to be the very low Durometer material of the nipple extending portion, and how that material behaves under manipulation by the infant in suckling, both in extension and also in compression. The elongated duct(s) in the preferred substantially solid embodiment appear to react much more like a mother's nipple than any prior art artificial nipple with this very low Durometer material. The infant also is believed to engage the soft area surrounding and extending outwardly from the distal end of the extending portion in a manner much more reminiscent of feeding at the breast. Furthermore, and unlike many prior art artificial nipples, the present invention permits the fluid flow characteristics of the nipple to respond to changes in vacuum. It is believed that the low Durometer material of the nipple, possibly in combination with other features of the present invention, can be tailored to allow a higher fluid flow rate at a relatively increased vacuum (by the infant).
As will be evident herein, the most preferred durometers are considered to be in the range at or below about Shore A 5, which would be most preferably around Shore 00 20 to 45. Even below the latter range may be useful.
Another way to look at the desired result in this nipple insofar as extension and compression under suckling, is through the elongation of the nipple material. Materials that have appeared very useful for the elongated portion of the nipple have shown a stress of approximately 40 psi or less at 300% elongation in a most preferred embodiment.
These, together with other objects and advantages will be further understood in the details of the construction and operation of the invention as more fully hereinafter described, reference being had to the accompanying drawings, forming a part hereof, wherein like numerals refer to like part throughout.
It will be noted that, while described in the environment of human infant feed, the invention has broader application to animal feeding, providing fluids to non-infants, and so on.
The nipple 10 here is formed of two subparts including a substantially solid nipple portion 12 at a proximal end thereof for insertion into an infant's mouth and for conveying fluids therethrough from an attached bottle (not shown). Proximal and distal, being indicative terms, are chosen here with respect to the user (e.g., the infant). The nipple portion is a generally cylindrical substantially solid body. However, it is understood that the nipple can be in other shapes such as “orthodontic” designs. The term “substantially solid”, for purposes of the present application, is broadly defined as a range from completely solid (i.e., including no voids or hollows except for the existence of one or more generally narrow ducts for conveying fluid), to having a hollow interior defined by sidewalls that include one or more ducts formed therethrough where the ducts have a significantly greater longitudinal length than radial width. As will be appreciated, there are certain functional attributes for the “solid” nipple portion 12 of this aspect of the invention that do not require a completely solid construct.
Preferably, the material of which the nipple portion 12 is fabricated has a Durometer A (or Shore A) hardness that is substantially within the range of about 1 to about 20. More preferably, the first material has a Durometer A hardness that is within the range of 1 to about 3, or switching to the Shore 00 is scale, most preferably in the range of about 20 to about 45. Below the latter range is nonetheless also considered efficacious. It will be understood that the use of the phraseology “less than x” or “less than about x” includes x.
The nipple 10 includes a second subpart or mounting portion 14 formed at a distal end thereof, which is designed to be attachable to a container in a fluid-tight manner. Alternatively, a secondary collar or like attachment piece could be used to attach the nipple 10 to the container. The material of which mounting portion 14 is fabricated preferably has a Durometer A hardness that may be formed of the same or a greater Durometer hardness than nipple portion 12. In one embodiment, the mounting portion 14 has a Durometer A hardness that is within the range of about 1 to about 100. More preferably, the material of the mounting portion 14 has a Durometer A hardness that is substantially within the range of about 20 to about 90, or even more preferably in the range of about 70 to about 90.
The nipple portion 12 illustrated in
A flange-like skirt or transitional member 24 extends generally radially 10 from the nipple portion 12 to an upper annular surface 26 of the mounting portion 14. The main body 28 of the mounting portion 14 may be formed of a gently concave cylinder 30, although this concavity is not required. A lower part 32 of the mounting portion 14 includes an inner lip 34 and a lower lip 36 with an inner groove 38 defined therebetween. The lower part 32 may be elastically deformed so as to be received on a container (not shown) and wherein the inner groove 38 is fitted over a corresponding mating feature on the container as in a snap-fit, screw attachment, and so on.
The nipple 10 may be formed as a single unitary part, or joined together from two or more parts. In this illustrated first embodiment, the nipple 10 is formed of two parts by a scarf-type joint 40. Adhesive bonding, heat bonding, chemical bonding, contact molding, ultrasonic welding or any suitable method may hold the joint 40 together. It will be understood that any suitable method of forming the nipple 10 may be employed, such as molding, casting, or two-shot molding, for example.
Referring to
A vent 162 is shown in
The nipple 310 may be formed of two subparts including a substantially solid nipple portion 312 at an upper or proximal end thereof for insertion into an infant's mouth and for conveying fluids therethrough from an attached container (not shown) and a lower or distal end including a mounting portion 314 for attachment to the container.
The nipple portion 312 is a generally cylindrical and substantially solid body. Again, the material of which the nipple portion 312 is fabricated is of a Durometer A (or Shore A) hardness that is substantially within the previously described preferred range. Of course, other shapes besides cylindrical can be used, such as orthodontic-type nipples, and so forth.
The nipple portion 312 includes a plurality of ducts 316 (see
During use, fluid may flow from chamber 320, into inner openings 318, through ducts 316 and out through outer openings 322. In an alternate embodiment, the outer openings 322 may include valve devices (not shown in this version, but see, for instance,
As shown in
The nipple portion 312 extends into a dome-like structure to form skirt 370 at a lower portion thereof. An inner face 372 of the skirt portion 370 overlaps and connects to an outer face 374 of a corresponding upper engaging section 376 of the mounting portion 314. Adjacent and below the upper engaging section 376 of the mounting portion 314, and shown in more detail in
Channel 381a and 381b is also shown in
The dome-like structure of skirt portion 370 has a lower rim section 394. In one embodiment, the low Durometer material of the nipple portion 312 extends to the lower rim 394. Alternatively, the lowest Durometer material stops at the bottom of the skirt 370. The flexibility of the nipple 310 and its general exterior softness can thus be suitably modified in this simple manner.
A retaining ring 388, preferably made of a rigid plastic, may be positioned abut the outer peripheral surface 390 of the mounting portion 314. The retaining ring 388 reinforces the mounting portion 314 over the thread feature 386, thereby assisting the mating of the thread feature 386 with the container, and prevents the mounting portion 314 from flexing outwardly when being attached thereto. The retaining ring 388 is held in place at least in part by a bead 392 formed at the rim section 394 of mounting portion 314. The ring 388 can advantageously be color coded to indicate a feature of the nipple 312, such as where a plurality of nipples are available in different shapes, flow rates, softness and so forth. Other differentiating indicia may be used besides color-coding, of course.
In this illustrated embodiment, the nipple 310 is formed from nipple portion 312 and mounting portion 314 by co-molding, adhesive bonding, heat bonding, chemical bonding, casting or any suitable method to unite the two. Again, the mold in which the present invention is molded may be sandblasted in order to produce a heavy matte finish on the nipple. In this manner, friction is reduced when screwing the nipple onto a container. This is particularly advantageous in a mounting portion made of silicone rubber or similar elastomer.
Turning to
As above, the nipple 410 includes a nipple portion 412 and a mounting portion 414. Preferably, the nipple portion 412 is made of a platinum cured or similar silicone rubber having a Shore A hardness in the ranges previously indicated. The nipple portion 412 of the nipple 410 has an insertable axial length of about 23 mm, a greater diameter of 13.5 mm and a lesser diameter of 11.8 mm. At times the suckling infant may also insert more of the nipple than just the first 23 mm of nipple portion 412 and may also insert some or even all of the skirt 470. The overall length of the nipple portion is 40.3 mm. It will be noted that the flexibility, and extensibility of this transition area between the elongated nipple portion and the mounting base, is very like that of the areola of the mother. Like the elongated nipple itself, the skirt 470 area stretches and elongated in the month.
The duct 422, formed in the nipple portion 412 is formed by a 21.8 mm pin in a molding process using platinum cured silicone rubber as the molded nipple material. The duct 422 is 1.1 mm in diameter. There may be more than one duct 422.
The mounting portion 414 is made of a silicone rubber having a Shore A hardness of 80. The depicted embodiment differs from that shown in
Turning to
The nipple portion 612 depicted in
All of these terminal structures in
Thus, while the invention has been described with respect to certain preferred embodiments, it will be understood by those of skill in the art that there are modifications, substitutions and other changes that can be made, yet will still fall within the intended scope of the invention, as set forth in the following claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/424,954 filed Nov. 8, 2002.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
589212 | Michael | Aug 1897 | A |
605161 | Clement et al. | Jun 1898 | A |
633343 | Heany | Sep 1899 | A |
1146639 | Miller | Jul 1915 | A |
1280942 | Apple | Oct 1918 | A |
1545436 | McGeary | Jul 1925 | A |
1588846 | McGeary | Jun 1926 | A |
1590152 | Dreyfus | Jun 1926 | A |
1632854 | Rogers | Jun 1927 | A |
1656157 | Correnti | Jan 1928 | A |
1672466 | Oshman et al. | Jun 1928 | A |
1672734 | Reilly | Jun 1928 | A |
1859733 | Fort | May 1932 | A |
1913627 | Epstein | Jun 1933 | A |
1989060 | Liddick | Jan 1935 | A |
2005437 | Naum | Jun 1935 | A |
2060212 | Herstein | Nov 1936 | A |
2321236 | Parkin | Jun 1943 | A |
2366214 | Ramaker | Jan 1945 | A |
2638094 | Kronish | May 1953 | A |
2655920 | Cronin | Oct 1953 | A |
2736446 | Raiche | Feb 1956 | A |
2825479 | Litzie | Mar 1958 | A |
2889829 | Tannenbaum et al. | Jun 1959 | A |
3022915 | Mullin | Feb 1962 | A |
3070249 | Sehrwald | Dec 1962 | A |
3082770 | Straub | Mar 1963 | A |
3126116 | Clinehens | Mar 1964 | A |
3139064 | Harle | Jun 1964 | A |
3190288 | Butler et al. | Jun 1965 | A |
3193125 | Fischer | Jul 1965 | A |
3424157 | Di Paolo | Jan 1969 | A |
3530979 | Merrill, Jr. et al. | Sep 1970 | A |
3593870 | Anderson | Jul 1971 | A |
3645413 | Mitchell | Feb 1972 | A |
3650270 | Frazier | Mar 1972 | A |
3661288 | Noll | May 1972 | A |
3777753 | Kesselring et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
3779413 | Pickerell et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
3787993 | Lyon | Jan 1974 | A |
3790016 | Kron | Feb 1974 | A |
3790017 | Fitzpatrick et al. | Feb 1974 | A |
3858741 | Smith, Sr. | Jan 1975 | A |
3946888 | Tonkin | Mar 1976 | A |
4006836 | Micallef | Feb 1977 | A |
4195638 | Duckstein | Apr 1980 | A |
4238040 | Fitzpatrick | Dec 1980 | A |
4311245 | Maffei | Jan 1982 | A |
D273515 | Fabjancic | Apr 1984 | S |
4505398 | Kesselring | Mar 1985 | A |
4586621 | Dahan | May 1986 | A |
4619271 | Burger et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4623069 | White | Nov 1986 | A |
4676386 | Phlaphongphanich | Jun 1987 | A |
4688571 | Tesler | Aug 1987 | A |
4700856 | Campbell et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4759139 | Ricks | Jul 1988 | A |
4815615 | Phlaphongphanich | Mar 1989 | A |
4832214 | Schrader et al. | May 1989 | A |
4834099 | Schrooten | May 1989 | A |
4941573 | Fuerstman | Jul 1990 | A |
4993568 | Morifuji et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5004473 | Kalantar | Apr 1991 | A |
5013321 | MacVane | May 1991 | A |
5035340 | Timmons | Jul 1991 | A |
5069351 | Gunderson et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5072842 | White | Dec 1991 | A |
5101991 | Morifuji et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5114374 | Estiva | May 1992 | A |
5117994 | Leblanc et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
D330938 | Sakashita | Nov 1992 | S |
5207338 | Sandhu | May 1993 | A |
5322031 | Lerner et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5474028 | Larson et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5499729 | Greenwood et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
D371848 | Searles | Jul 1996 | S |
5535899 | Carlson | Jul 1996 | A |
5542922 | Petterson et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5544766 | Dunn et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5553726 | Park | Sep 1996 | A |
5598809 | McInnes | Feb 1997 | A |
5673806 | Busnel | Oct 1997 | A |
5688238 | Moser et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5690679 | Prentiss | Nov 1997 | A |
D417735 | Ford | Dec 1999 | S |
6003698 | Morano | Dec 1999 | A |
6032810 | Meyers et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6161710 | Dieringer et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6241110 | Hakim | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6253935 | Fletcher | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6270519 | Botts | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6343704 | Prentiss | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6588613 | Pechenik et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6675981 | Lesko | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6736830 | Roust | May 2004 | B2 |
6745912 | Uehara et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6818162 | Hoffman et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6871751 | Kerns et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6968964 | Gilmore | Nov 2005 | B2 |
20030032984 | Hakim | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030089676 | Uehara et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093120 | Renz | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093121 | Randolph | May 2003 | A1 |
20040026351 | Dunn et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040045922 | Holley, Jr. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040124168 | Silver | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040245203 | Goldman et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050258123 | Silver | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060011571 | Silver | Jan 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 300 786 | Jan 1989 | EP |
2 700 6890 | Jul 1994 | FR |
347368 | Apr 1931 | GB |
2 208 291 | Dec 1989 | GB |
61-244360 | Oct 1986 | JP |
2-264660 | Oct 1990 | JP |
4-41864 | Oct 1992 | JP |
7-1939 | Jan 1995 | JP |
2000313498 | Nov 2000 | JP |
02002011076 | Jan 2002 | JP |
WO 8606273 | Nov 1986 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040124168 A1 | Jul 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60424954 | Nov 2002 | US |