The present invention relates to surface coverings and artificial stones for forming a surface covering. More particularly, the invention relates to stones, flagstones, pavers, bricks, veneer blocks and tiles for forming surface coverings, such as walkways, roadways, pavements or wall coverings.
It is well known in the art that surfaces, such as walkways, driveways, patios, floors, work surfaces, walls and other interior or exterior surfaces can be covered for durability and aesthetics with flagstones, stones, bricks, pavers, tiles and other architectural surface covering elements. Natural stone surface coverings are constructed by fitting together irregularly sized and shaped flat stones, such as flagstone, stone and slate. This work requires a skilled stonemason to select, cut and fit the stones. It is labor intensive, and accordingly expensive. To minimize installation time, the stonemason uses a combination of large stones or slabs, for achieving as much surface coverage in as short a time as possible, and a collection of small stones, so called filler stones, for filling in any gaps between the irregularly shaped large stones.
Various efforts have been made to develop artificial building elements, such as bricks, stones, flagstones, pavers, or the like with the appearance of natural stone. Such artificial building elements are usually relatively inexpensively mass produced by molding them from concrete, usually in a dry casting operation. They are typically provided in geometric shapes, such as triangles, squares, rectangles and hexagons, or in irregular shapes, or combinations thereof. The goal is to provide units of preset shape, which can be placed side by side in mating arrangement to produce a continuous surface covering. However, even if irregularly shaped stones are used, the repetitive nature of the installation usually results in a repeating, sometimes even geometric pattern, or at least a ‘linear line effect’. This counteracts any ‘natural’ appearance of the overall surface covering, despite the almost ‘natural’ appearance of the individual elements. Furthermore, even irregularly shaped stones with randomly placed simulated joints embossed into their facing surface, when laid out in mating arrangement still produce a repeating pattern, since the overall shape of the stones becomes apparent from the pattern of the perimeter joints around the stones, once multiple stones are laid out in a repeating pattern. Thus, these stones still fail to provide an aesthetically pleasing appearance with a degree of natural irregularity close to that of custom installations of natural stone.
Thus, there still exists a need for an artificial stone, flagstone, paving stone or the like which upon installation in a mating array with like artificial stones provides the appearance of a natural stone installation with large slabs and intermediate small filler stones.
Throughout the description, the expressions ‘stone’ and ‘flagstone’ are used interchangeably without distinction and to designate any blocks, stones, flagstones, paving stones, pavers, siding bricks or blocks, veneer bricks, and the like. Therefore, the expressions “artificial stone” and “artificial flagstone” should be given their broadest possible meaning and should be interpreted to encompass any and all artificial stone elements for forming any surface covering.
The term “artificial” is used throughout this specification to designate any non-naturally occurring product.
The term “regular” as used in relation to the geometric shape of various parts of the artificial stone in this specification is used to define a regular geometric shape.
The term “simulated joint” as used in this specification describes all structures which penetrate the facing surface of an artificial stone to divide the facing surface into surface portions. The simulated joints preferably extend only through a portion of the height of the artificial stone, so that when the unit is installed, they provide the appearance of a regular joint between individual stones, giving the visual impression of an arrangement of smaller subunits. The simulated joints preferably are sufficiently deep to retain the joint filler material used for installation of the artificial stones, such as sand or mortar, but do not affect the integrity of the stone during normal handling and installation. The term “perimeter recess” is used throughout this specification to describe a recess, cut-away, or notch along the outer edge of the artificial stone, which extends into the body of the stone from the perimeter and up to the surface of the stone to create the appearance of a cut-away or notch in the body of the stone at the perimeter. The perimeter recess gives the artificial stone the appearance of a natural stone having peripheral shape imperfections and results in a gap between the stone and another like stone placed in engagement therewith. Since the perimeter recess extends into the body from the perimeter, the gap is wider then the adjoining perimeter joint.
The overall appearance of a mating array of artificial flagstones varies depending on the degree of subdivision of the facing surface of the individual stones. However, even when artificial flagstones with mutually different surface subdivisions are used, once they are arranged in a regular array, a discernible repeating pattern appears, irrespective of the surface subdivisions of the individual stones. This is due to the perimeter joints between the stones forming a regular, repeating pattern, since all the stones have the same body shape. It has now been surprisingly discovered that even a repeating pattern of flagstones of substantially identical body shape can be made to have a substantially random or natural appearance. This can be achieved by not only dividing the facing surface of the individual stones by one or more simulated joints to provide the appearance of a large stone or slab and one or more adjacent and smaller filler stone, but by further providing the stones with a perimeter recess. The natural appearance effect becomes especially apparent when the facing surface is designed to include a major area free of any subdividing, simulated joints so that the resulting artificial stone has a facing surface including a major surface area free of any simulated joints and having the appearance of a slab. It has been surprisingly discovered that even when artificial stones in accordance with the invention are installed in a repeating installation pattern with intermediate perimeter joints, a substantially random or natural appearance is generated by the inclusion of the perimeter recess. Including one or more recesses in one or more stones in the repeating pattern, preferably in each stone, results in one or more holes or gaps in the surface covering produced by the mating array, which gaps are then filled with sand, mortar or like filler material after placement of the artificial stones to form the surface covering. These gaps appear identical to gaps found in arrangements of natural stones due the shape mismatch of natural stones. Most importantly, those gaps are provided to interrupt the perimeter joints between adjoining stones and to thereby break up the perimeter joint pattern in an array of like stones arranged in a repeating installation pattern. The resulting overall appearance of the surface covering of artificial stones of the invention is then one of a multitude of larger stones, intermediate smaller stones and joints between the stones, with some joints widening out into the gaps formed by the perimeter recesses. Each gap is preferably larger than the adjoining perimeter joint and at most 5 times as large as the perimeter joint.
In one preferred aspect, the present invention provides an artificial flagstone for covering a supporting surface, which flagstone includes a body with a facing surface and base surface for placement on the supporting surface. The body has a body shape with a polygonal body contour which defines the footprint of the stone. The facing surface has a total surface area defined by a facing contour. The facing surface is subdivided by at least one simulated joint into a major surface portion and at least one minor surface portion. The major surface portion is continuous and free of simulated joints, extends over at least about 60% of the total surface area and has the appearance of a slab, while the minor surface portion has the appearance of a filler stone.
In another preferred aspect of the invention, the major surface portion extends over at least about 65%, preferably at least about 68%, most preferably at least about 70% of the total surface area.
In still another preferred aspect of the invention, the major surface portion extends over at least about 75%, preferably at least about 80% of the total surface area, most preferably at least about 85%.
In a further preferred aspect of the invention, the minor surface portion extends over at most about 30% of the total surface area and is free of simulated joints. In still a further preferred aspect of the invention, the surface area is divided into a major surface portion and a pair of minor surface portions, the combined area of the minor surface portions being at most about 30% of the total surface area. Preferably, the surface area is divided into a major surface portion and a plurality of minor surface portions, the combined area of the minor surface portions being at most about 35%, preferably at most about 30%, most preferably at most about 25% of the total surface area and the simulated joints cover at most about 5% of the total surface area.
In yet a further preferred aspect of the invention, the major surface portion of the facing surface extends over at least 70% of the footprint of the stone, the minor surface portion extends over at least 15% of the footprint, the simulated joints cover at most 5% of the footprint and the perimeter recesses cover at most 10% of the footprint.
Artificial flagstones in accordance with the invention for covering a supporting surface preferably include a polygonal footprint and a body shaped as a right prism for mating engagement of the flagstone with like flagstones in an array or repeating installation pattern for producing a surface covering.
Preferably, the facing surface has a facing contour fitting within the footprint of the body. The facing surface preferably has a surface structure with the appearance of natural stone. The contour of the facing surface is preferably irregular for enhancing the natural appearance of the stone. To further enhance the natural appearance, the facing surface preferably has at least one irregularly shaped protrusion or depression for giving the facing surface the appearance of natural stone. More preferably, the facing surface has at least one irregularly shaped protrusion and at least one irregularly shaped depression.
Most preferably, the perimeter recess extends from the facing surface all the way to the base surface so that a gap or hole is formed between the flagstone and an adjacent, mating flagstone. The gap preferably has a width which is larger then the width of the adjoining perimeter joint. The perimeter recess can be placed anywhere along the perimeter of the artificial stone, but is preferably placed at a corner of the flagstone, or adjacent an end of a simulated joint to further enhance the natural appearance of a surface covering of mating flagstones in accordance with the invention.
Artificial stones in accordance with the invention are preferably made by dry casting and the perimeter recess is preferably made by a division plate used in the dry cast mold. In a variant, the facing surface has at least two areas of different elevation, which areas are preferably irregularly shaped areas.
In another aspect of the invention, the artificial stone is breakable along at least one of the simulated joints. This allows breaking off one or more of the minor surface portions, while still rendering possible a mating engagement of the broken artificial stone with other like units, either complete or broken off, and provides greater flexibility for size adjustment during installation. The simulated joints may in some locations extend all the way to the base surface of the artificial stone to facilitate breaking off of the minor surface portion, as long as this does not affect the integrity of the stone during normal handling and installation.
In a further preferred aspect of the invention, the artificial stone is shaped and constructed as a paving stone. The artificial stone of the invention is preferably made by dry casting and is most preferably is a dry cast paving stone.
In still another preferred aspect, the invention provides a set of artificial stones for producing a surface covering in a regular, repeated pattern, but with an irregular surface appearance, simulating the appearance of natural stone. The set includes at least two flagstones with a body of polygonal cross-section and shaped as a right prism to fit together in a mating arrangement, and an irregularly shaped facing surface. The facing surface of one flagstone in the set is different in appearance from the facing surface of every other flagstone in the set and especially differs in the placement and/or number of the simulated joints and the placement and/or number of the perimeter recess regions. Preferably, the set of flagstones includes all the stones made within a multi-cavity dry casting frame, whereby each cavity produces a stone with a different facing surface.
Other objects and advantages of the invention will become apparent upon reading the detailed description and upon referring to the drawings in which:
a to 9g are schematic views of different artificial stones, each having a major surface portion covering 70% or more of the facing surface;
a to 12d are schematic views of different artificial stones with rectangular base, each having a major surface portion covering 70% or more of the facing surface; and
a to 14i are schematic views of different artificial stones of a shape similar to those shown in
a to 16d are schematic views of artificial stones with a right rectangular base portion and a top portion with a facing surface of an irregular outline fitting within the rectangular outline of the base portion;
a to 18c show schematic isometric views of artificial stones with a generally hexagonal footprint and a facing surface divided into a major surface portion covering at least 70% of the facing surface and one or more minor surface portions and
d to 18f show the same stones, but having at least one perimeter recess;
a to 20d are schematic isometric views of artificial stones with a right rectangular base portion and a top portion with a facing surface of an irregular outline fitting within the rectangular footprint of the base portion and
a to 23d are schematic isometric views of artificial stones with a right triangular base portion and a top portion with a facing surface of an irregular outline fitting within the triangular footprint of the base portion and
a and 25b are schematic illustrations of artificial stones in accordance with the invention with hexagonal and rectangular footprint, respectively and illustrating the areas of the footprint covered by the major surface portion, the minor surface portion, the simulated joints an the perimeter recesses.
Before explaining the present invention in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the preferred embodiments contained therein. The invention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced or carried out in a variety of ways. It is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology employed herein are for the purpose of description and not of limitation.
The present invention provides artificial stones, flagstones, bricks, pavers, tiles and the like for forming surface coverings, such as pavements, walkways or wall coverings, having the appearance of a natural stone covering.
A preferred artificial stone 100 in accordance with the invention as shown in
The major surface portion preferably extends over about 65% of the total surface area, more preferably at least 70%, even more preferably at least 75%, most preferably about 80%.
The facing surface 32 preferably has a polygonal facing contour 33. The simulated joints 34 are preferably positioned to divide off one or more points of the polygonal facing surface 32 (
The simulated joints 34 preferably extend through a portion of the height of the stone 100, so that when the stone is laid out, it gives the visual impression of an arrangement of smaller units, while still retaining the advantages of handling only a larger block. In another aspect of this embodiment, the joints 34 can be sufficiently deep so that the artificial stone 100 may be breakable along the joints 34. This allows breaking off a section of the stone, while still rendering possible a mating engagement of the broken stone with other ones. The simulated joints 34 may in some locations extend all the way to a base surface 19 of the artificial stone to facilitate the breaking off, as long as this does not affect the integrity of the stone during normal handling and installation.
A preferred artificial stone 100 in accordance with the invention as illustrated in
The intermediate portion 50 preferably has at least one circumferential portion which it is outwardly tapered. The intermediate portion 50 preferably has at least one sidewall 52 extending between the rim 39 and a sidewall 11 of the base portion 10 and joining the base portion sidewall 11 and the rim 39 at an acute angle of 0 to 25°. This construction greatly facilitates the dry casting operation by ensuring an even distribution of the concrete mix and, thus, an even fill of the mold. Damage to the freshly molded stone during stripping and disengagement from the mold due to sharp corners in the mold and adhesion to mold surfaces is also minimized with this construction.
In the embodiments shown in
The artificial stone 100 is preferably manufactured by dry casting. The facing contour 33 of the facing surface 32 preferably fits into and is located above the footprint of the base portion 10 (see
The outline or facing facing contour 33 of the facing surface 32 is preferably irregular for achieving a natural appearance. To further enhance the natural appearance of the top portion 30, the facing surface 32 preferably has at least one irregularly shaped protrusion 35 or depression 36 (see
To avoid the generation of the “linear line effect” often observed with regularly shaped artificial stones in the art, especially those with a polygonal facing surface, the stone 100 of the present invention is preferably provided with a facing surface 32 which is unevenly divided by one or more simulated joints to provide the appearance of a large stone and a small stone.
The exemplary artificial flagstones shown in
The facing surface 32 preferably has a polygonal facing facing contour 33. The simulated joints 34 are preferably positioned to divide off one or more points or corners of the polygonal facing surface 32. When more than one simulated joint 34 is provided, (
a to 12d show a set of artificial stones 100 in accordance with the invention. Each illustrated artificial stone 100 in accordance with the invention includes a body 110 in the shape of a right rectangular prism and a facing surface 32 on the body. The facing surface 32 has a facing contour 33 and a surface area and is divided by at least one simulated joint 34 into a major surface portion 40 and one or more minor surface portions 42, 43, 44, 45, 46 located at the facing contour 33. The major surface portion 40 is free of simulated joints 34 and extends over at least about 60% of the total surface area of the facing surface and has the appearance of a slab. The minor surface portion has the appearance of a filler stone, or multiple filler stones, giving the artificial stone the overall appearance of a large slab stone combined with one or more filler stones.
In this embodiment, the facing surface 32 has a substantially rectangular facing contour 33. The simulated joints 34 are positioned to divide off one side of the rectangular facing surface 32. When more than one simulated joint 34 is provided, (
a to 14i show a set of artificial stones 100 in accordance with the invention and similar to those shown in
The facing surface 32 preferably has a polygonal facing facing contour 33. The simulated joints 34 are preferably positioned to divide off one or more points or corners of the polygonal facing surface 32. When more than one simulated joint 34 is provided, (
a to 16d show a set of artificial stones 100 in accordance with the invention and similar to those shown in
The facing surface 32 preferably has an irregular, but overall substantially rectangular facing facing contour 33. The simulated joints 34 are preferably positioned to divide off one or more points or corners of the polygonal facing surface 32. When more than one simulated joint 34 is provided, each joint can be positioned to divide off a separate minor portion 42, 43, respectively located at different corners, sides or points of the facing surface. Alternatively, one simulated joint 34 can be used to divide off a minor portion 42 along one side of the facing surface 32 and one or more additional simulated joints 34 can be used to subdivide this minor portion 42 into multiple minor portions 43, 44, 45. It is also within the confines of the invention to subdivide the minor portion 42 into multiple sub-portions (43, 44, 45) by a plurality of simulated joints 34, whereby one or more of the sub-portions are no longer located at the facing facing contour 33 (see
In a particularly preferred embodiment, as illustrated in
The preselected body contour 270 or footprint of the artificial stones of
Preferably, the peripheral recesses 260 extend over the full height of the artificial stone 200 as shown in
a to 20h show a set of artificial stones 200 in accordance with the invention and similar to those shown in
Similar to the stones of
a to 23h show a set of artificial stones 200 in accordance with the invention and similar to those shown in
a and 25b schematically illustrate artificial stones 200 in accordance with the invention with hexagonal and square footprint 270 respectively. The areas of the footprint covered by the major surface portion 40, the minor surface portions 42, 43, 44, the simulated joints 34 and the perimeter recesses 260 are respectively identified. It is preferred that, as is apparent from
In another aspect, the invention provides a set of artificial stones, wherein the top surface texture of each stone in the set is different from the top surface texture of every other stone in the set. Such a set of stones preferably includes all the stones made within a multi-cavity dry casting frame, whereby each cavity produces one stone with a facing surface that is unique within the set. The base portions of the stones in the set preferably have a polygonal cross-section and are shaped as a right prism so that the base portions fit together in a mating arrangement of the flagstones in the set and flagstones of other like sets.
In a preferred method in accordance with the invention, the set of artificial stones is made in a dry casting operation using a multi-cavity mold having a tamper shoe with a differently shaped compression surface for each cavity in the mold to produce a different surface texture for the artificial stone made in each cavity. The method preferably includes the steps of providing a multi-cavity dry casting frame, each mold cavity of the dry casting frame having sidewalls for shaping the body of the artificial stone, at least one division plate in the dry casting frame separating adjacent cavities having a protrusion for extending into one cavity and forming a perimeter recess in a sidewall of the dry cast stone made in the cavity, placing the multi-cavity dry casting frame on a press support, filling the mold cavity with a dry cast concrete mixture and compressing the dry cast concrete mixture with the tamper shoe having a different surface structure for each mold cavity, stripping the compressed pre-product from the mold cavity, and curing the stripped pre-product to form the set of artificial stones. In a preferred embodiment, the method includes the step of replacing the division plate in the dry casting frame having the protrusion with a division plate having one or more different protrusions to form one or more different perimeter recesses in the dry cast artificial stones.
From the above, it can easily be understood that the artificial stone according to the present invention can advantageously be used for creating patios, pathways, sidewalks or stepping stones for non-limitative examples. Moreover, the artificial stone of the present invention can advantageously be easily laid out to form a pavement or a wall surface where no straight lines and hardly any repetition can be seen, giving as a result, the look of old world craftsmanship, replicating the complexity of a natural stone assembly.
Furthermore, it will be appreciated that all of the artificial stone of a pavement can be the same, but still create a visually “random” effect in which no straight lines can be seen.
The artificial stone according to the present invention has several advantages over prior art products. Indeed, its installation is very easy, does not require distinctive markers for guiding the installation, and does not require professional skills. The resulting pavement has no “linear effect”, that is, a person walking thereon would not see any straight line in front of him or her. It has a random look, achieved with a single stone design.
While the invention has been described with a certain degree of particularity, it is understood that the invention is not limited to the embodiments set forth herein for purposes of exemplification, but is to be limited only by the scope of the attached claims, including the full range of equivalency to which each element thereof is entitled.
Although the present invention has been explained hereinabove by way of preferred embodiments thereof, it should be pointed out that any modifications to these preferred embodiments within the scope of the appended claims are not deemed to alter or change the nature and scope of the present invention.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/794,452 filed Mar. 11, 2013, allowed, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/993,526 filed Nov. 19, 2010, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,413,397 on Apr. 9, 2013, which is a U.S. national phase of International Application No. PCT/CA2009/000688 filed on May 20, 2009 and published on Nov. 26, 2009 as International Publication No. WO 2009/140760 A1, which application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/054,983, filed on May 21, 2008, the contents of all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
653515 | Kennedy | Jul 1900 | A |
1474779 | Zur Kammer | Nov 1923 | A |
1479647 | Carroll | Jan 1924 | A |
1600787 | Ardit | Sep 1926 | A |
1953657 | Pierce | Apr 1934 | A |
2050299 | Evers | Aug 1936 | A |
D102144 | Parker | Dec 1936 | S |
2605681 | Thrief | Aug 1952 | A |
2606428 | Oldfather | Aug 1952 | A |
2662343 | Rice | Dec 1953 | A |
2893098 | Tilley | Jul 1959 | A |
2991213 | Williams | Jul 1961 | A |
3171335 | Pincon et al. | Mar 1965 | A |
D204803 | Leeth | May 1966 | S |
3267823 | MacRae | Aug 1966 | A |
3386001 | Slosberg et al. | May 1968 | A |
3600773 | Davis et al. | Aug 1971 | A |
D230478 | Littman et al. | Feb 1974 | S |
D231926 | Appleton | Jun 1974 | S |
3870423 | Peitz, Jr. | Mar 1975 | A |
3903702 | Appleton | Sep 1975 | A |
3947192 | Rosenberger | Mar 1976 | A |
4026083 | Hoyt et al. | May 1977 | A |
4078760 | Mullins | Mar 1978 | A |
4105354 | Bowman | Aug 1978 | A |
4125341 | Reinschutz | Nov 1978 | A |
4131406 | Fresquez | Dec 1978 | A |
4135840 | Puccini et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
4217740 | Assanti | Aug 1980 | A |
4231677 | Roming | Nov 1980 | A |
D257824 | Puccini et al. | Jan 1981 | S |
D257825 | Puccini et al. | Jan 1981 | S |
4287141 | Russell | Sep 1981 | A |
4313689 | Reinschutz | Feb 1982 | A |
4349293 | Rosenberger | Sep 1982 | A |
4354773 | Noack | Oct 1982 | A |
4407480 | Trimmer et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
D272037 | Puccini | Jan 1984 | S |
4452419 | Saleeba | Jun 1984 | A |
4510725 | Wilson | Apr 1985 | A |
4544305 | Hair | Oct 1985 | A |
D281505 | Larsen et al. | Nov 1985 | S |
4609303 | Shumaker | Sep 1986 | A |
4627764 | Scheiwiller | Dec 1986 | A |
D287884 | Scheiwiller | Jan 1987 | S |
4761095 | Bartlechner | Aug 1988 | A |
4773790 | Hagenah | Sep 1988 | A |
4776723 | Brimo | Oct 1988 | A |
4792257 | Rinninger | Dec 1988 | A |
4828426 | Hendricks et al. | May 1989 | A |
4834575 | Barth | May 1989 | A |
4838728 | McKeever | Jun 1989 | A |
4919565 | Göpfert | Apr 1990 | A |
4921372 | Hybertson | May 1990 | A |
D314240 | Scheiwiller | Jan 1991 | S |
4997308 | Welling, Jr. | Mar 1991 | A |
5051023 | Yoshida et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5108219 | Hair | Apr 1992 | A |
5133620 | Scheiwiller | Jul 1992 | A |
5201843 | Hair | Apr 1993 | A |
5211895 | Jacklich, Sr. | May 1993 | A |
5230584 | Grossman | Jul 1993 | A |
5244303 | Hair | Sep 1993 | A |
D342528 | Hupp | Dec 1993 | S |
5267810 | Johnson | Dec 1993 | A |
D343237 | Johnson, II | Jan 1994 | S |
D343238 | Hair | Jan 1994 | S |
5277514 | Glickman | Jan 1994 | A |
5281047 | Skaug | Jan 1994 | A |
5286139 | Hair | Feb 1994 | A |
D349967 | Krueger et al. | Aug 1994 | S |
5342142 | Barth et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5348417 | Scheiwiller | Sep 1994 | A |
5449245 | Glickman | Sep 1995 | A |
5486066 | Hagenah | Jan 1996 | A |
5487526 | Hupp | Jan 1996 | A |
5496129 | Dube | Mar 1996 | A |
5520388 | Osborn | May 1996 | A |
5524396 | Lalvani | Jun 1996 | A |
5568391 | Mckee | Oct 1996 | A |
5588775 | Hagenah | Dec 1996 | A |
5597591 | Hagenah | Jan 1997 | A |
5619830 | Osborn | Apr 1997 | A |
5625990 | Hazlett | May 1997 | A |
5645369 | Geiger | Jul 1997 | A |
5713155 | Prestele | Feb 1998 | A |
5797698 | Barth et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
D397802 | Terry | Sep 1998 | S |
D399978 | Barth et al. | Oct 1998 | S |
D404147 | Woolford | Jan 1999 | S |
5884445 | Woolford | Mar 1999 | A |
5887846 | Hupp | Mar 1999 | A |
5902069 | Barth et al. | May 1999 | A |
5921705 | Hodson et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5945181 | Fisher | Aug 1999 | A |
D424212 | Abbrancati | May 2000 | S |
D426897 | Abbracati | Jun 2000 | S |
6073411 | Ciccarello | Jun 2000 | A |
D429343 | Milot | Aug 2000 | S |
D429530 | Fleishman | Aug 2000 | S |
D431870 | Ziegler, Jr. | Oct 2000 | S |
D431871 | Abbrancati | Oct 2000 | S |
6168347 | Milot et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
D439677 | Mattox | Mar 2001 | S |
6263633 | Hagenah | Jul 2001 | B1 |
D452015 | Aurelius | Dec 2001 | S |
RE37694 | Riccobene | May 2002 | E |
D463866 | Jang | Oct 2002 | S |
6471440 | Scheiwiller | Oct 2002 | B1 |
D471990 | Riccobene | Mar 2003 | S |
6536988 | Geiger | Mar 2003 | B2 |
D480819 | Barbier | Oct 2003 | S |
6668484 | Riccobene | Dec 2003 | B2 |
D486246 | Manthei | Feb 2004 | S |
D488566 | Fleishman | Apr 2004 | S |
6715956 | Weber et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
D492796 | Price | Jul 2004 | S |
6881463 | Riccobene | Apr 2005 | B2 |
D505733 | Castonguay et al. | May 2005 | S |
D506013 | Anderson et al. | Jun 2005 | S |
D522667 | Castonguay et al. | Jun 2006 | S |
D536058 | Riccobene | Jan 2007 | S |
D537501 | Riccobene | Feb 2007 | S |
D537959 | Castonguay et al. | Mar 2007 | S |
D540954 | Bouchard | Apr 2007 | S |
D541436 | Wissman | Apr 2007 | S |
D543642 | Castonguay et al. | May 2007 | S |
D550375 | Thomassen et al. | Sep 2007 | S |
D553260 | Castonguay et al. | Oct 2007 | S |
D553759 | Hamel | Oct 2007 | S |
7393155 | Riccobene | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7425106 | Altmann et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
D578658 | Keys | Oct 2008 | S |
D586925 | Riccobene | Feb 2009 | S |
D590070 | Castonguay et al. | Apr 2009 | S |
D590071 | Castonguay et al. | Apr 2009 | S |
D590072 | Castonguay et al. | Apr 2009 | S |
D602173 | Thomassen | Oct 2009 | S |
D602604 | Harris | Oct 2009 | S |
D606210 | Thomassen | Dec 2009 | S |
7637688 | Riccobene | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7674067 | Riccobene | Mar 2010 | B2 |
D618364 | Schrom et al. | Jun 2010 | S |
D620616 | Ciccarello | Jul 2010 | S |
D624202 | Thomassen et al. | Sep 2010 | S |
D624203 | Thomassen et al. | Sep 2010 | S |
7850393 | Hamel | Dec 2010 | B2 |
D640800 | Thomassen | Jun 2011 | S |
D643544 | Thomassen | Aug 2011 | S |
7988382 | Castonguay et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
7993718 | Riccobene | Aug 2011 | B2 |
D645573 | Dallaire et al. | Sep 2011 | S |
D645574 | Thomassen | Sep 2011 | S |
8011152 | Thomassen | Sep 2011 | B2 |
D646600 | Minkkinen | Oct 2011 | S |
8132981 | Castonguay et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
D660982 | Thomassen | May 2012 | S |
D664677 | Riccobene | Jul 2012 | S |
8226323 | Bouchard et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8282311 | Chow | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8298641 | Riccobene | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8337116 | Castonguay et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8413397 | Lacas et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8500361 | Castonguay et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
D695915 | Dignard et al. | Dec 2013 | S |
D695916 | Dignard et al. | Dec 2013 | S |
D695917 | Dignard et al. | Dec 2013 | S |
D695918 | Dignard et al. | Dec 2013 | S |
D695919 | Dignard et al. | Dec 2013 | S |
D695920 | Dignard | Dec 2013 | S |
D695921 | Dignard | Dec 2013 | S |
D695922 | Dignard | Dec 2013 | S |
8609215 | Riccobene | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8668404 | Bouchard et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8747019 | Castonguay et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8769896 | Lacas et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8967907 | Castonguay et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
20030007834 | Bolduc et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20070077387 | Riccobene | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070217865 | Castonguay et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080095577 | Brun | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080209828 | Riccobene | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080240857 | Ciccarello | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20100236174 | Castonguay et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100307092 | Bouchard et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110067333 | Lacas et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20120003040 | Castonguay et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120189386 | Castonguay et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120247050 | Bouchard et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130017016 | Castonguay et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130259569 | Castonguay et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130263543 | Lacas et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140047788 | Riccobene | Feb 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
570711 | Nov 1961 | BE |
1150553 | Jul 1983 | CA |
2083215 | May 1994 | CA |
2519296 | Oct 2004 | CA |
2569998 | May 2006 | CA |
2616200 | Apr 2008 | CA |
562921 | Jun 1975 | CH |
7122262 | Nov 1971 | DE |
3533020 | Mar 1987 | DE |
9211118 | Mar 1993 | DE |
4232300 | Mar 1994 | DE |
4333942 | Apr 1995 | DE |
19747421 | Apr 1999 | DE |
19937639 | Feb 2000 | DE |
29922003 | Feb 2000 | DE |
10001967 | Jul 2001 | DE |
20101214 | May 2002 | DE |
0424592 | May 1991 | EP |
666372 | Aug 1995 | EP |
2354416 | Jan 1978 | FR |
1094632 | Dec 1967 | GB |
DES. 1047163 | Dec 1987 | GB |
2208883 | Apr 1989 | GB |
2214206 | Aug 1989 | GB |
2002285504 | Oct 2002 | JP |
1180760 | Jun 2003 | JP |
1180761 | Jun 2003 | JP |
1180860 | Jun 2003 | JP |
1180861 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2004-124634 | Apr 2004 | JP |
3640654 | Jan 2005 | JP |
7415523 | Jun 1976 | NL |
DES. 44357 | Oct 1998 | SE |
WO9415025 | Jul 1994 | WO |
WO0144578 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO0153612 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO02059423 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO0289934 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO02095133 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO2005084900 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO2006045192 | May 2006 | WO |
WO2009039617 | Apr 2009 | WO |
WO2009140760 | Nov 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 14/199,801, filed Mar. 6, 2014, Lacas et al. |
European Search Report for 12153381.4-1604/2487295, Sep. 12, 2013. |
European Search Report for 12153383.0-1604/2472017, Sep. 11, 2013. |
European Search Report for 12153384.8-1604/2487310, Sep. 10, 2013. |
European Search Report for 12153380.6-1604/2472016, Sep. 11, 2013. |
Lawrence, Backyard Brickwork, 1989, p. 76, Garden Way Publishing, Pownal, VT, U.S.A. |
Fitzgerrell, Basic Masonry Illustrated, a Sunset Book, 1981, pp. 76-77, Lane Publishing Co., Menlo Park, CA, U.S.A. |
Bomanite Corp.—Leadership a Reputation for Excellence, Innovation & Experience, 1994, Bomanite International Society, Madera, CA, U.S.A. |
Brickform Patterns-1 Sheet, 1994. |
Brickform Texture Mats-2 Sheets, 1988. |
Brickform Tools-Texture Mats-4 Sheets, Undated—Admitted Prior Art. |
Color Tile Advertisement, Royal Rock Ceramic Tile, Jan. 14, 1990, Houston Post, Houston, TX, U.S.A. |
Creative Impressions, Ltd., Export Price List and Drawings, Apr. 1990, U.K. |
Exhibit G-Photocopy of Front of Color Tile Royal Rock Ceramic Tile, Undated—Admitted Prior Art. |
Exhibit H-Photocopy of Rear of Color Tile Royal Rock Ceramic Tile, Undated—Admitted Prior Art. |
Decristoforo, Handyman's Guide to Concrete and Masonry, 1978, pp. 183-189, Reston Publishing Co., Inc., Reston, VA, U.S.A. |
Decristoforo, Handyman's Guide to Concrete and Masonry Handbook, 1960, p. 70, Arco Publishing Co., Inc., New York City, NY, U.S.A. |
Lasting Impressions in Concrete, Inc., Undated, CA, U.S.A. Admitted Prior Art. |
Patterned Concrete Industries, Inc., Specifications, Undated, Houston, TX, U.S.A. Admitted Prior Art. |
Sweet's Catalog, vol. 2 Bomacron Patterns, 1994. |
Sweets General Building and Renovation, 1993 Catalog File, p. 11, Anchor Buyline 6518, 04200/ANC. |
Duncan, The Complete Book of Outdoor Masonry, 1977, pp. 342-345, TAB Books, Blue Ridge Summit, PA, U.S.A. |
Uni-Group U.S.A.-Manufacture of Uni Paving Stones the Original. The Best., 1992, Palm Beach Gardens, FL, U.S.A. |
Extended European Search Report dated Apr. 18, 2011 in related Application No. 05799111.9. |
Written Opinion dated Feb. 2, 2006 in related Application No. PCT/CA2005/001644. |
Written Opinion dated Dec. 15, 2008 in related Application No. PCT/CA2008/001656. |
Written Opinion dated Sep. 8, 2009 in related Application No. PCT/CA2009/000688. |
Grunbaum, B. and Shephard, G.C., “Tilings and Patterns,” 1987, pp. 288-290, 510 W.H. Freeman and Company, New York, N.Y. |
“Landscapes Become Dreamscapes,” Pavestone Company, 2003, 2 pages. |
Neolithics Masonry Design, www.neolithicsusa.com, Nov. 2003, 3 pages. |
Author: Jinny Beyer, Designing Tessellatins: The Secrets of Interlocking Patterns, Chapter 7: The Keys to creating Interlocking Tessellations: pp. 1-7, 16-17 and 125-165, 1999. |
Nature Walk™ Natural Flagstone Appeal for Pedestrian Traffic, 2001, 4 pages. |
Website: www.sf-kooperation.de/english/index—Pentalith, Canteon, Jul. 2001, 3 pages. |
Website:www.sf-kooperation.de/english/index—Canteon®; CIS 300-10; Pentalith, Sep. 2003, 5 pages. |
Retaining Walls, Pavestone Brochure, published 2002, 6 pages. |
Concrete Landscaping/Products, Oldcastle Brochure, published 2002, 12 pages. |
Website: www.mathforum.org/sum95/suzanne/whattess.html—What is Tessellation?—dated Apr. 24, 2002, 4 pages. |
Beautiful Edgers, Pavestone Brochure, published 2002, 5 pages. |
Website: www.superstone.com—Split Rock, Dec. 2002, 1 page. |
Website: www.matcrete.net/RandomStone.htm—MATCRETE the Ultimate in Concrete Design, Dec. 2002, 1 page. |
Patio Dreamscapes, Pavestone Brochure; Sandstone System, published 2003, 5 pages. |
Landscaping Stones, Mat Stone Brochure, Nature Walk, Garden Walk, published 2003, 2 pages. |
Paving Stone Dreamscapes, Pavestone Brochure, published 2003, 13 pages. |
Website: www.geckostone.com—GECKOSTONE™,Mar. 2003, 4 pages. |
Website: www.learningcompanyschool.com—TesselMania! Deluxe, Jun. 2003, 3 pages. |
Website: riverdeep.net/products/other/tesselmania.jhtml—TesselMania!, Jun. 2003, 4 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140205807 A1 | Jul 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61054983 | May 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13794452 | Mar 2013 | US |
Child | 14199801 | US | |
Parent | 12993526 | US | |
Child | 13794452 | US |