Patent Application
20200240050
This invention relates to artificial turf, and more particularly to an artificial turf with textured yarn and to a production method for textured yarn.
Artificial turf or artificial grass is a material that is made up of fibers used to replace natural grass. The structure of the artificial turf is designed such that the artificial turf has an appearance which resembles natural grass. Typically artificial turf is used as a surface for sports such as soccer, American football, rugby, tennis, golf, and for playing fields or exercise fields. Furthermore, artificial turf is frequently used for landscaping applications.
Artificial turf may be manufactured using techniques for manufacturing carpets. For example, artificial turf fibers which have the appearance of grass blades may be tufted or attached to a backing. Artificial turf does not need to be irrigated or trimmed and has many other advantages regarding maintenance effort and other aspects. Irrigation can be difficult due to regional restrictions for water usage. In other climatic zones the re-growing of grass and re-formation of a closed grass cover is slow compared to the damaging of the natural grass surface by playing and/or exercising on the field. Artificial turf does not need sunlight and thus can be used in places where there is not enough sunlight to grow natural grass. To ensure that artificial turf replicates the playing qualities of good quality natural grass, artificial turf needs to be made of materials that will not increase the risk of injury to players and that are of adequate durability. Many sports fields are subjected to high-intensity use relating to player-to-surface interactions and ball-to-surface interactions. The surface of the artificial turf fibers must be smooth enough to prevent injuries to the skin of the players when sliding on the surface, but at the same time must be sufficiently embedded into the substructure to prevent the fibers from coming loose. Thus, the materials used for producing artificial turf must have highly specific properties regarding smoothness, brittleness, resistance to shear forces, etc.
The following definitions are provided to determine how terms used in this application, and in particular, how the claims, are to be construed. The organization of the definitions is for convenience only and is not intended to limit any of the definitions to any particular category.
A “polymer blend,” as understood herein, is a mixture of polymers, which can have different types (e.g., different types of polyethylene). The polymer blend can comprise various additives added to the polymer mixture. The polymer blend can be at least a three-phase system. A three-phase system as used herein encompasses a mixture that separates out into at least three distinct phases. The polymer blend can comprise a first polymer, a second polymer, and a compatibilizer. These three items form the phases of the three-phase system. If there are additional polymers or compatibilizers added to the system then the three-phase system may be increased to a four, five, or more phase system. The first polymer and the second polymer are immiscible. The first polymer forms polymer beads surrounded by the compatibilizer within the second polymer.
The term “polymer blend,” as understood herein, encompasses the term “polymer mixture”. The term “blend,” as understood herein, encompasses both a physical mixture of polymer particles on a macroscopic scale and a dispersion of polymers on a molecular scale.
The terms “polymer bead” and “beads” may refer to a localized region, such as a droplet, of a polymer that is immiscible in the second polymer. The polymer beads may in some instances be round or spherical or oval-shaped, but they may also be irregularly shaped. In some instances the polymer bead will typically have a size of approximately 0.1 to 3 micrometers, preferably 1 to 2 micrometers in diameter. In other examples, the polymer beads will be larger. They may, for instance, have a diameter up top 50 micrometers.
A polymer blend may also be composed of compatible and miscible polymeric components. Compatibility means, as understood herein, that blending of, e.g., two distinct polymers, leads to an enhancement of at least one desired property, when comparing the blend to one of the two individual blend components. Ideally, the performance of the blend lies in between the range, which is flanked by the two blend components, in fact, in strong relationship to the concentration ratio. However, compatibility is only given in some exceptional cases, mostly related to completely amorphous polymers. In nearly all other polymer mixtures, an enhancement of properties fails and the resulting blend stays far behind the property profile of the involved blend components. Polymer miscibility, as used here, is meant in a thermodynamic sense and can be compared to solubility. Completely miscible polymers form a single phase continuity upon mixing, i.e., one component is fully dispersed in the other component. This is in most cases true for amorphous polymers, but it is a rare case for semi-crystalline polymers. Complete miscibility would also require co-crystallization of the crystalline phase. This explicitly would affect the melting behavior of polymeric blends.
The term “polymorphism” or “polymorphic modification,” as used herein, refers to the fact that solid matter is able to exist in different forms of crystal structures. This may include not only different crystallographic unit cells but different crystal imperfections as well.
The “melting temperature” is, as understood here, a characteristic temperature of a polymer blend, at which at least a portion of a crystalline fraction of one of the polymers of the polymer blend melts. In the case when a crystalline fraction of the polymer of the polymer blend has polymorphism, then the polymorphic modification of the polymer having polymorphism has a respective melting temperature at which at least a portion of the polymer has polymorphism. Melting at the melting temperature is a process wherein the thermal energy in a crystalline fraction of a polymer is sufficient to overcome the intermolecular forces of attraction in the crystalline lattice so that the lattice breaks down and at least a portion of the crystalline fraction becomes a liquid, i.e., it melts. Further in the text, the term “melting temperature” of a polymer refers to a melting process of its crystalline fraction without explicit reference to the latter. This formulation is in conformity with the general practice, because purely crystalline polymers are very rarely used and are quite difficult to produce.
The “sigmoid (sigmoidal) function” is, as understood here, a limited function having non-positive or non-negative derivative and a characteristic S-shaped curve. The sigmoid function can be, for instance, the logistic function expressed by the following formula: S(x)=1/(1+exp(−x)).
Utilization of textured (curled) yarns in artificial turf carpets may provide for the above-mentioned required properties of the artificial turf carpets. Textured yarns are different from flat monofilament yarns in that they are irregularly crimped. The textured yarns exhibit a zig-zag shape having at least one of the characteristic features such as kinks, jogs, bends, crinkles, buckling, and curls. These features make the textured yarns more voluminous and soft when manufactured into artificial turf, compared to flat monofilament fibers. The textured yarn may also be advantageous over flat yarn concerning the capability of holding infill material in its place, i.e. reducing the splash of infill material when, e.g. a ball hits the ground.
The invention provides for an artificial turf carpet, a method of manufacturing the artificial turf carpet, a textured (curled) artificial turf yarn, and a method of manufacturing the textured (curled) artificial turf yarn as formulated in the independent claims. Embodiments are given in the dependent claims.
In one aspect the invention provides for a method of manufacturing a textured artificial turf yarn using a texturing device and a controller operable to hold an actual temperature of a texturing process in the texturing device at a desired temperature, wherein the method comprises: providing a monofilament yarn, wherein the monofilament yarn comprises a polymer blend of polymers; receiving differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) data of a sample of the polymer blend; determining one or more melting temperatures of the monofilament yarn using the DSC data; determining a desired temperature of the texturing process using the one or more melting temperatures; and texturing the monofilament yarn using the texturing device to provide the textured artificial turf yarn, wherein the controller is programmed to hold the actual temperature at the determined desired temperature. The monofilament yarn may have, for instance, a width of 1-1.1 mm and a thickness of 0.09-0.11 mm. The monofilament yarn weight may typically reach 50-3000 dtex. The DSC data can be measured by using a DSC system.
Utilization of the DSC data may be advantageous, because it may provide for a melting temperature of the polymer (or its particular polymorphic modification) in the polymer blend. As discussed further in greater detail, the texturing (curling) of the monofilament yarn may be performed within the temperature range, in which at least a portion of a crystalline fraction (or of a polymorphic modification) of at least one of the polymers of the polymer blend remains in a solid state. Thus the knowledge of the melting temperatures determined using DSC data may provide for the temperature range that may be optimal for the texturing (curling) process.
In another embodiment, the desired temperature of the texturing process is determined such that a portion of a crystalline fraction of the polymer blend is in a solid state in a process of the texturing (curling) of the monofilament yarn and another portion of the crystalline fraction of the polymer blend is in a molten state in the process of the texturing (curling) of the monofilament yarn.
This embodiment may be advantageous because it may provide for an optimal process temperature, wherein at least a portion of each of the polymers (or their polymorphic modifications) of the polymer blend is in a molten state. The portion of the crystalline fraction that is molten can be more than 10% (preferably 25%) by weight of the entire crystalline fraction. The portion of the crystalline fraction that remains solid can be more than 10% (preferably 25%) by weight of the entire crystalline fraction.
In another embodiment, the desired temperature of the texturing process is determined such that a crystalline fraction of one of the polymers is completely or almost completely in a solid state in a process of the texturing of the monofilament yarn and a crystalline fraction of another one of the polymers is completely or almost completely in a molten state in the process of the texturing of the monofilament yarn.
This embodiment may be advantageous because it may provide for a more robust process temperature, wherein at least one crystalline fraction of the respective polymer remains completely or almost completely in a solid state during the texturing (curling) process. Selecting the texturing process temperature as specified in this embodiment provides for an improved stability and repeatability of the texturing process, because in the texturing process the crystalline fraction of one of the polymers is completely in a solid state and the crystalline fraction of the other one of the polymers is completely in a molten state.
In another embodiment the one or more melting temperatures is two or more melting temperatures, wherein the desired temperature is determined within a temperature range or the desired temperature is determined as a range within the temperature range, wherein the temperature range has an upper boundary temperature being less or equal to one of the melting temperatures, wherein the temperature range has a lower boundary temperature being greater or equal to another one of the melting temperatures.
This embodiment may be advantageous because it may provide for a simple and straightforward definition of the optimal texturing process temperature.
In another embodiment, the upper boundary temperature is no more than a predetermined percentage larger than the lower boundary temperature in degrees Celsius, wherein the predetermined percentage is any one of the following: 5%, 10%, or 15%.
This embodiment may be advantageous because it may provide for a simple definition of the optimal process window, because only one melting temperature has to be determined using the DSC data (e.g., heat flow versus temperature curve).
The only one melting temperature can be determined using the first registered peak of the curve, when the curve is measured by increasing the temperature. In addition, this embodiment may be advantageous because the heating of the monofilament yarn in the step of the texturing (curling) of the monofilament yarn may be reduced to a minimum, thereby providing for an energy-efficient process.
In another embodiment the other one of the melting temperatures is the lowest of the one or more melting temperatures. The crystalline meting temperature used in this embodiment can be used as the lower boundary temperature.
In another embodiment, each of the melting temperatures is a melting temperature of the respective polymer.
In another embodiment, the melting temperature of the respective polymer is a minimum temperature at which only a portion of a crystalline fraction of the respective polymer is in a molten state. The portion of the crystalline fraction of the polymer can be defined in a range of 10%-90% (preferably 25%-75%) by weight of a crystalline fraction of the polymer.
In another embodiment, the DSC data comprises a heat flow curve versus temperature, wherein the crystalline temperature of the respective polymer is a temperature at which a peak of a heat flow curve corresponding to a melting of a crystalline fraction of the respective polymer has its maximum.
This embodiment may be advantageous because it can provide for an effective approach for determining the melting temperatures.
In another embodiment, wherein at least one of the polymers has polymorphism, wherein some of the melting temperatures is a melting temperature of a respective polymorphic modification of the polymer having polymorphism.
In another embodiment the polymer blend comprises first portions each having the respective polymorphic modification, wherein the melting temperature of the respective polymorphic modification is a minimum temperature at which only a portion of the first portion having the respective polymorphic modification is in a molten state. The portion of the first portion can be defined in a range of 10%-90%) (preferably 25%-75%) by weight of the first portion.
In another embodiment the DSC data comprises a heat flow curve versus temperature, wherein the crystalline temperature of the respective polymorphic modification is a temperature at which a peak of the heat flow curve corresponding to a melting of the respective polymorphic modification has its maximum.
This embodiment may be advantageous because it can provide for an effective approach for determination of the melting temperatures.
In another embodiment, the DSC data comprises a curve of a heat flow versus temperature in a temperature range, wherein the curve has a base line, wherein the curve coincides with the base line at a lower boundary temperature of the temperature range and at an upper boundary temperature of the temperature range, wherein the upper boundary temperature and the lower boundary temperature are different temperatures, wherein the determined desired temperature complies with the following constraint: a ratio of an integral value and an overall integral value is within a predefined range, wherein the integral value is equal to an integral of a difference of the curve and the base line from the lower boundary temperature to the determined desired temperature, wherein the overall integral value is equal to an integral of the difference of the curve and the base line from the lower boundary temperature to the upper boundary temperature. The predefined range can be 0.05-0.15, preferably 0.09-0.11.
In another embodiment at least two of the polymers are different types of polyethylene.
This embodiment may be advantageous because polyethylene may have superior properties for manufacturing of the textured yarn in comparison with other polymers. Particularly, linear polyethylene (e.g. linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE) or and high-density polyethylene (HDPE) offers a wide range of physical material properties, covering the technical requirements of artificial turf yarn. The density of linear polyethylene can be widely modified by co-monomers. The molecular weight distribution can be controlled with catalysts and by polymerization process management. Blending different types of polyethylene broadens the variability further. In particular, LLDPE is blended, i.e. mixed, with compatible material, such as VLDPE and/or HDPE with densities different from LLDPE. It may also be possible to blend different types of LLDPE.
Utilization of polymer blends comprising different types of polyethylene may provide for a balance between stability and softness of the textured yarn. Stability means in this context stiffness, wear resistance, hardness, resilience, etc., whereas softness means flexibility, elasticity, smoothness, etc. Blending different materials each with the required stability or softness may result in the properties providing the required balance between stability and softness.
In another embodiment the texturing device comprises a stuffer box.
This embodiment may be advantageous because it may provide for an improved quality of the textured yarn. The nozzle for hot air injection of the stuffer box can provide for advanced temperature control when the hot air has the temperature within the temperature range of the texturing process. A turbulent flow of the hot air inside the stuffer box can facilitate the process of texturing (curling).
In another embodiment the texturing device comprises a venturi nozzle.
This embodiment may be advantageous because it may provide for an improved quality of the textured yarn. The monofilament yarn passes through the venturi nozzle together with a hot air. The venturi nozzle can be configured such that the monofilament yarn is textured (curled) by the turbulent flow of the hot air in an exiting throat. Moreover the venturi nozzle can provide for substantial pressure increase in the exiting throat which can facilitate the texturing (curling) process. Injection of the hot air in the venturi nozzle can provide for an advanced process control when the injected hot air has the temperature.
In another embodiment the texturing device is an air jet texturizing machine. The air jet texturizing machine can be built as disclosed in the book “Synthetic Fibers” by Franz Fourné in chapter 4.12.4 (“Synthetic Fibers,” Franz Fourne; Carl Hanser Verlag GmbH & Co, 1999, ISBN 10: 3446160728/ISBN 13: 9783446160729, p. 449-452).
In another embodiment the method further comprises raising the temperature of the monofilament yarn to a temperature within the temperature range (of the texturing process) using one or more godets.
This embodiment may be advantageous because it may provide for an improved process control, since the monofilament yarn is preheated to the temperature within the temperature range before the step of texturing (curling) of the monofilament yarn.
In another embodiment the sample for collecting the DSC data is taken from the polymer blend.
This embodiment may be advantageous because it may provide for an effective determination of the temperature range within which the texturing (curling) of the monofilament yarn is performed.
In another embodiment the sample for collecting the DSC data is a sample of the monofilament yarn.
This embodiment may be advantageous because it may provide for an effective determination of the temperature range within which the texturing (curling) of the monofilament yarn is performed. For instance, the monofilament yarns can be manufactured using different methods. Executing DSC on different samples can enable selection of an appropriate monofilament yarn.
In another embodiment the method further comprises drawing (stretching) the monofilament yarn, e.g. to a factor of 4-6.5.
This embodiment may be advantageous because it may provide for an increase in crystallinity of the monofilament yarn (e.g. an increase in crystallinity of at least one of the polymers of the polymer blend used for the manufacturing of the monofilament yarn). In the other words, the size of crystalline portions of the monofilament yarn (or at least one of the polymers of the polymer blend) is increased relative to the size of amorphous portions of the monofilament yarn. As a result the monofilament yarn or at least of the polymers of the polymer blend become more rigid. The stretching of the monofilament yarn can further cause reshaping of fragments (e.g. beads) of one of the polymers of the polymer blend used for the manufacturing of the monofilament yarn such that they have thread like regions, which can make impossible delamination of different polymers in the monofilament yarn from each other, in particular when immiscible polymers are used in the polymer blend. This embodiment may also be advantageous, because the drawing (stretching) process of the monofilament yarn can give rise to polymorphism, i.e. crystallographic unit cell modification. For instance the drawing process can result in forming triclinic crystal modification of polyethylene in addition to orthorhombic crystal modification of polyethylene formed after extruding and cooling.
This drawing of the monofilament yarn causes the monofilament to become longer and in the process the fragments of one of the polymers of the polymer blend (e.g. beads) are stretched and elongated. Depending upon the amount of stretching the fragments of one of the polymers (e.g. beads) of the polymer blend are elongated more.
In another embodiment the providing of the monofilament yarn comprises extruding the polymer blend into the monofilament yarn.
This embodiment may be advantageous, because it may provide for manufacturing of the monofilament yarn out of a broad spectrum of polymers including immiscible polymers.
In another embodiment the method further comprises creating the polymer blend, wherein the polymer blend is at least a three-phase system, wherein the polymer blend comprises a first polymer, a second polymer, and a compatibilizer, wherein the first polymer and the second polymer are immiscible, wherein the first polymer forms polymer beads surrounded by the compatibilizer within the second polymer.
In a specific example the first polymer could be polyamide and the second polymer could be polyethylene. Stretching the polyamide will cause an increase in the crystalline regions making the polyamide stiffer. This is also true for other semi-crystalline plastic polymers.
In another embodiment, the first polymer comprises (or consists of) polyamide (PA) and the second polymer comprises (or consists of) polyethylene (PE). The first polymer may comprise at least 90 weight percent of PA. The second polymer can comprise at least 90 weight percent of PE. The polymer mixture can comprise at least 30 weight percent of PE and/or at least 30 weight percent of PA.
In another embodiment, the first polymer comprises (or consists of) polyester and the second polymer comprises (or consists of) PE. The first polymer may comprise at least 90 weight percent of polyester. The second polymer can comprise at least 90 weight percent of PE. The polymer mixture can comprise at least 30 weight percent of PE and/or at least 30 weight percent of polyester.
In another embodiment, the first polymer comprises (or consists of) polyester and the second polymer comprises (or consists of) polypropylene (PP). The first polymer may comprise at least 90 weight percent of polyester. The second polymer can comprise at least 90 weight percent of PP. The polymer mixture can comprise at least 30 weight percent of PP and/or at least 30 weight percent of polyester.
In another embodiment, the first polymer comprises (or consists of) PA and the second polymer comprises (consists of) PP. The first polymer may comprise at least 90 weight percent of PA. The second polymer can comprise at least 90 weight percent of PP. The polymer mixture can comprise at least 30 weight percent of PP and/or at least 30 weight percent of PA.
These embodiments related to the polymer blends/mixtures may be advantageous because it may enable utilization of a broader spectrum of polymers for manufacturing of the monofilament yarn such that the properties of the artificial turf fiber can be tailored. As it is mentioned above different polymers of the polymer blend can provide for different properties of the textured yarn. One polymer can provide for the stability and/or the resilience (e.g. the ability to spring back after being stepped or pressed down), while another polymer can provide for the softness (e.g. the softer or a grass-like feel).
These embodiments related to the polymer blends/mixtures may have a further advantage that the second polymer and any immiscible polymers may not delaminate from each other. The thread-like regions can be embedded within the second polymer. It is therefore impossible for them to delaminate.
A further advantage may possibly be that the thread-like regions are concentrated in a central region of the monofilament during the extrusion process. This may lead to a concentration of the more rigid material in the center of the monofilament yarn and a larger amount of softer plastic on the exterior or outer region of the monofilament yarn. This may further provide for an artificial turf fiber with more grass-like properties, when the artificial turf fiber is made of the textured (curled) monofilament yarn.
A further advantage may be that the artificial turf fibers made of the textured (curled) monofilament yarn have improved long term elasticity. This may require reduced maintenance of the artificial turf and less brushing of the fibers because they more naturally regain their shape and stand up after mechanical use.
In another embodiment the creating of the polymer blend comprises the steps of: forming a first blend by mixing the first polymer with the compatibilizer; heating the first blend; extruding the first heated blend; granulating the extruded first blend; mixing the granulated first blend with the second polymer; and heating the granulated first blend with the second polymer to form the polymer blend. This particular method of creating the polymer mixture may be advantageous because it enables very precise control over how the first polymer and compatibilizer are distributed within the second polymer. For instance the size or shape of the extruded first mixture may determine the size of the polymer beads in the polymer mixture.
This embodiment may be advantageous, because a so called single-screw extrusion method may be used. As an alternative to this, the polymer blend may also be created by putting all of the components that make it up together at once. For instance the first polymer, the second polymer and the compatibilizer could be all added together at the same time. Other ingredients such as additional polymers or other additives could also be put together at the same time. The amount of mixing of the polymer blend could then be increased for instance by using a twin-screw feed for the extrusion. In this case the desired distribution of the polymer beads can be achieved by using the proper rate or amount of mixing.
In another embodiment the polymer blend is at least a four phase system, wherein the polymer blend comprises at least a third polymer, wherein the third polymer is immiscible with the second polymer, wherein the third polymer further forms the polymer beads surrounded by the compatibilizer within the second polymer.
This embodiment may be advantageous because it may enable utilization of an even broader spectrum of polymers for manufacturing of the monofilament yarn. As it is mentioned above different polymers of the polymer blend can provide for different properties of the textured yarn. One polymer can provide for the stability, while another polymer can provide for the softness. This particular embodiment can provide for combining in a final product properties of at least three polymers.
In another embodiment the creating of the polymer blend comprises the steps of: forming a first blend by mixing the first polymer and the third polymer with the compatibilizer; heating the first blend; extruding the first heated blend; granulating the extruded first blend; mixing the first blend with the second polymer; and heating the mixed first blend with the second polymer to form the polymer blend.
This embodiment may be advantageous because it may provide for an effective procedure for manufacturing of the polymer blend comprising multiple polymers. As an alternative the first polymer could be used to make a granulate with the compatibilizer separately from making the third polymer with the same or a different compatibilizer. The granulates could then be mixed with the second polymer to make the polymer mixture. As another alternative to this the polymer mixture could be made by adding the first polymer, a second polymer, the third polymer and the compatibilizer all together at the same time and then mixing them more vigorously. For instance a two-screw feed could be used for the extruder.
In another aspect the invention provides for a textured (curled) artificial turf yarn manufactured as described above.
In another aspect the invention provides for a method of manufacturing an artificial turf carpet, wherein the method comprises: manufacturing the textured artificial yarn as described above; tufting the textured artificial turf yarn into a backing. The artificial turf backing may for instance be a textile or other flat structure which is able to have fibers tufted into it. The textured artificial turf yarn may also have properties or features which are provided for by any of the aforementioned method steps.
In another aspect the invention provides for an artificial turf carpet manufactured according to the method for manufacturing of the artificial turf according to the aforementioned embodiment.
In the following embodiments of the invention are explained in greater detail, by way of example only, making reference to the drawings in which:
Like numbered elements in these figures are either equivalent elements or perform the same function. Elements which have been discussed previously will not necessarily be discussed in later figures if the function is equivalent.
The extruder 100 comprises at least one hopper 101 for feeding components of a monofilament yarn (e.g. a blend of polymers) into the extruder and one outlet 102 for the monofilament yarn. The outlet 102 can be implemented as a wide slot nozzle or a spinneret. A polymer melt formed in a chamber of the extruder is pressed through the outlet 102 to form a monofilament yarn of a specific shape. A fragment of the wide slot nozzle or the spinneret is depicted in
In some examples the polymer blend can have different compositions. Within the polymer blend 96 there is a large number of polymer beads 138. The polymer beads 138 may be made of one or more polymers that is not miscible with the second polymer 137 and is also separated from the second polymer 137 by a compatibilizer. A screw, piston or other device is used to force the polymer blend 96 through a hole 95 in a plate 102a. This causes the polymer blend 96 to be extruded into a monofilament yarn 119. The monofilament yarn 119 is shown as containing polymer beads 138 also. The second polymer 137 and the polymer beads 138 are extruded together. In some examples the second polymer 137 will be less viscous than the polymer beads 138 and the polymer beads 408 will tend to concentrate in the center of the monofilament yarn 119. This may lead to desirable properties for the final artificial turf fiber as this may lead to a concentration of the thread-like regions in the core region of the monofilament yarn 119.
The monofilament yarn can be cooled down after the extrusion using the cooling device 97. When the cooling device is implemented as a godet, it can comprise two rollers 99 and 98 for winding the monofilament yarn 119. The cooling process can be implementing by maintaining a temperature of the rollers 99 and 98 within the specified range and/or by air cooling and/or by water cooling. A temperature of water (or air) can be kept within a specified range as well. Alternatively the cooling device can be a bath with a cooling liquid (e.g. water) in which the monofilament yarn is cooled. The monofilament yarn is cooled down using the cooling device 97 to a temperature where crystallization can take place. In the crystallization process the crystallites are forming to a percentage, which depends on the cooling rate. The higher the cooling rate, the less is the crystallinity and vice versa.
The monofilament yarn can be further drawn using the drawing device 115. The drawing device can comprise three rollers 104, 103, 105. The drawing ratio is defined as the ratio of linear speeds of a pair of rollers 103 and 104 (or 104 and 105). The drawing device 115 can be operable for heating the monofilament yarn 119 during or before the drawing process. This can be implemented by heating one or more the rollers in order to keep their temperature within a predetermined temperature range and/or by air heating, wherein the hot air has a temperature within a predetermined temperature range. The elongation of the monofilament yarn in the drawing device can force the macromolecules of the monofilament yarn to parallelize. This results in a higher degree of crystallinity and increased tensile strength, compared with undrawn monofilament yarn.
The monofilament yarn can be further cooled using the cooling device 116. The cooling device, when implemented as a cooling godet can have rollers 106 and 107. The cooling device can be built and/or function in the same way as the cooling device 97. Afterwards the monofilament yarn can be further drawn using the drawing device 118 having rollers 110, 111, and 112. The drawing device 118 can be built and/or function in the same way as the drawing device 115.
The monofilament yarn can be further heated using one or more heating devices 117. The heating device 117, when implemented as a godet, comprises a pair of rollers 108 and 109. The heating of the monofilament yarn can be made by keeping a temperature of the rollers within a predetermined temperature range and/or by hot air having a temperature within a predetermined temperature range. A temperature sensor 113 positioned in-between the heating godet 117 and the texturing (curling) device 114 can be used as a feedback temperature sensor for providing feedback to the heating godet 117 in order to provide a temperature of the monofilament yarn within a temperature range required for the texturing (curling) process. The temperature sensor 113 can be configured to measure the temperature of the monofilament yarn by registering infrared radiation of the monofilament yarn.
A controller 70 is configured to control a process temperature of the texturing process in the texturing device 114. The controller 70 comprises a computer processor 72 and memory 73 comprising instructions executable by the computer processor. The controller is communicatively coupled to the texturing device 114, the temperature sensor 113, and the heating device 117. The communicative coupling can be implemented via a computer network 71. The controller is operable to hold an actual temperature of a texturing process in the texturing device at a desired temperature which is required for the texturing process. The desired temperature can be specified as a temperature range. In this case the holding of the actual temperature at the desired temperature comprises keeping the actual temperature within the specified range, in particular the actual temperature is kept as close as possible to a middle temperature of the temperature range. The middle temperature is equal to an average of a lower boundary of the temperature range and an upper boundary of the chosen temperature range. The temperature of the texturing process can be determined by at least one of the following factors: a temperature of the monofilament yarn, a temperature in a texturing device component, in which the texturing process takes place, and a temperature of a texturing device component, which is in physical contact with the monofilament yarn in the texturing process. The execution of the computer instructions by the computer processor 72 causes the controller to hold the process temperature at the desired temperature. The control of the process temperature can be implemented as follows. The controller reads out the temperature of the monofilament yarn registered by the temperature sensor 113. The temperature of the monofilament yarn is used as a feedback signal for setting the temperature of the heating device 117 in order to provide the heating of the monofilament yarn to the desired temperature. The functioning of this feedback loop can be implemented using a proportional-integral-derivative algorithm. In addition the controller can provide temperature setting signals to the texturing device and/or other devices operable for changing the temperature of the texturing process. This can be implemented in the same way as the aforementioned feedback loop, i.e. by reading one or more temperature values registered by one or more temperature sensors of the texturing device and providing the feedback signal to the texturing device and/or the other device for holding a temperature in the texturing device at the desired temperature. The feedback signal can be provided to the texturing device and/or any other device operable for changing a temperature of the texturing process. The functioning of this feedback loop can be implemented using the proportional-integral-derivative algorithm as well. The controller can be configured to operate the aforementioned feedback loops independently on in conjunction with each other.
After the heating using one or more heating devices 117 the monofilament yarn is textured (curled) in the texturing (curling) device 114. The textured (curled) monofilament yarn 122 is cooled using a cooling godet 120. The cooling can be performed by keeping a temperature of a roller 120 of the cooling godet within a predetermined temperature range and/or by air having a temperature within a predetermined temperature range. The textured monofilament yarn 122 can be forwarded further to another roller 121 for further processing.
The sequence of optional processing units, i.e. the cooling godet 97, the drawing device 115, the cooling godet 116, the drawing device 118, the heating godet 117, can be different. It depends on particular processing steps required for preprocessing steps before the texturing (curling) process. Additional drawing devices, and/or heating devices, and/or cooling devices can be included. For instance several heating devices can be used instead of the single heating device 117 depicted in
The textured (curled) monofilament yarn, which can be used as the artificial turf fibers can be prepared from a polymer blend comprising at least two polymers. The polymer blend can be a more complex mixture. The polymer blend can be at least a three phase system. It can comprise a first polymer, a second polymer, and a compatibilizer. These components form a three-phase system. The first and a second polymer are immiscible. If there are additional polymers or compatibilizers are used in the polymer blend, then the three phase system may be increased to a four, five or more phase system. The first polymer could be polyamide and the second polymer could be polyethylene. The polymer blend can comprise a polar polymer and a non-polar polymer. The polymer blend can comprise at least one of the following: polyethylene terephthalate, which is also commonly abbreviated as PET, polybutylene terephthalate, which is also commonly abbreviated as PBT, polyethylene, polypropylene.
The compatibilizer can be any one of the following: a maleic acid grafted on polyethylene or polyamide; a maleic anhydride grafted on free radical initiated graft copolymer of polyethylene, SEBS, EVA, EPD, or polyproplene with an unsaturated acid or its anhydride such as maleic acid, glycidyl methacrylate, ricinoloxazoline maleinate; a graft copolymer of SEBS with glycidyl methacrylate, a graft copolymer of EVA with mercaptoacetic acid and maleic anhydride; a graft copolymer of EPDM with maleic anhydride; a graft copolymer of polypropylene with maleic anhydride; a polyolefin-graft-polyamide; and a polyacrylic acid type compatibilizer.
For instance, the textured (curled) monofilament yarn, which can be used as the artificial turf fibers can be prepared from polyethylene based polymers. Different polyethylene (type) based polymers are blended such that a desired property profile is created. The main focus hereby lies on the crimp properties of the monofilament yarn.
The polymer blend can comprise LLDPE and HDPE. LLDPE is a copolymer of ethylene and α-olefin or 1-olefin. Several 1-olefins can be copolymerized together with ethylene, but most of the commercially available LLDPEs are copolymers with 1-butene, 1-hexene or 1-octene, or mixtures thereof, as co-monomers. In a polymerization process, both the monomer ethylene and the co-monomer 1-olefin are incorporated step-by-step into a growing macromolecular chain. In each single step either an ethylene molecule or a 1-olefin molecule is added to the chain.
The sequence of ethylene and 1-olefin units along the chain is determined by both, the polymerization catalysts and the details of the reaction layout, such as pressure, temperature, etc. In general, there are two distinctive types of catalysts; multi-site catalysts and single-site catalysts. The type of catalyst controls the polymerization progress and the way in which monomers and co-monomers are added to the polymer chain. Polymers are always entities of macromolecules with different chain length, distributed around an average value. Polymers are thus characterized by a molecular weight distribution. Different average values can be defined depending on statistical methods. In practice two averages are used, denoted as Mn and Mw. Mn is the number average of the molecular weight distribution, mathematically expressed by
M
n
=Σn
i
M
i
/Σn
i
MW is the weight average of the molecular weight distribution and is related to the fact that heavier molecules contribute more to the arithmetic average than the lighter ones. This is mathematically expressed by
Mw=Σn
i
M
i
2
/Σn
i
M
i
The polydispersity index PDI is the ratio of Mw/Mn and indicates the broadness of the distribution. In general, polymers prepared with multi-site catalysts have a greater PDI than those prepared with single-site catalysts.
Moreover, the chemical composition of the macromolecules depends on the type of catalyst. As mentioned above, every 1-olefin or α-olefin can act as a co-monomer in the polymerization process, but typically only 1-butene, 1-hexene and 1-octene is in use for copolymerization of LLDPE. As these molecules carry a double bond between two carbon atoms, it is possible to insert them instead of an ethylene molecule into the growing chain of the macromolecule which forms in the polymerization process. The incorporation of a 1-olefin molecule into the polymer main chain leaves, other than ethylene does, a side chain on the main chain. 1-butene, for instance, includes 4 carbon atoms and generates an ethyl side chain, whereas two carbon atoms (the two with the double bond between carbon atoms 1 and 2) are incorporated into the main chain and another two carbon atoms extent outwardly of that main chain as a side chain. In case of 1-hexene the length of the side chain is 4 carbon atoms and it is 6 with 1-octene. Concerning the side chain distribution, the molecular architecture may greatly be influenced by the choice of the catalyst used in the polymerization process. Multi-site catalysts, also referred to as Ziegler or Ziegler-Natta catalysts or Phillips catalysts, yield in heterogeneously branched polymers, whereas single-site catalysts, also referred to as metallocene catalysts, yield in homogeneously branched polymers. In heterogeneously branched macromolecules the distance from one branching point to another branching point is broadly distributed along the polymer main chain. The other way round, the branches are more evenly spaced in homogeneous branched LLDPEs. It has also been observed that with Ziegler catalysts the co-monomers are preferably incorporated into the short length main chains, while the longer main chains deplete of co-monomers. Depending on the design of the polymerization process the side chain branching is heterogeneous or homogeneous.
The use of multi-site catalysts results in polymers with relatively broad molecular weight distributions compared with single-site catalysts. Moreover, the molecular weight distribution can be influenced by using a cascaded reactor layout, leading to polymers with multimodal molecular weight distributions. Blending different types of polyethylene in situ, i.e. inside the polymerization reactor, or ex situ, i.e. after polymerization, broadens the variety further.
Number, length and distribution of the side chains in PE macromolecules greatly influence the properties and the processability. According to applicant's experience, it is advantageous to use LLDPE with a broad distribution of side chains, typical for Ziegler-catalyzed, solution polymerized polymers for turf fiber production, in particular for texturized turf fiber production. The fraction of short length polymer chains with high branching makes the fibers, produced of these LLDPE-types, easy to texturize. In the course of the texturizing process the fibers need to be softened under the influence of heat and then deformed, such that a wanted crimped shape results and stays on the fibers. It has turned out that the above mentioned LLDPE-types are appropriate for this process.
Preferably, in the texturizing (curling) process a certain fraction of the polymeric filament (i.e. monofilament yarn) must be in a molten state, i.e. the small crystallites of the structure have lost their ordered state, whereas another fraction has not. This means, that the filaments ought to be stable enough not to adhere or lump and deformable enough to crimp under the impact of heat and mechanical deformation. Once the deformation is achieved, the filaments are quenched giving rise to crystallization of the small crystallites. Thereby the texturizing stays in the filaments.
Texturizing is supported by both, the chemical structure of the polymeric filaments and the temperature of the filaments at the moment of deformation. Both can be appraised by knowledge of the melting behavior of the polymeric filaments. The melting behavior manifests in a characteristic melting graph detected by DSC. In a characteristic melting graph, measured by DSC, the variation of the melt enthalpy (heat flow) over time, i.e. dH/dt is plotted against the variation in temperature over time, i.e. dT/dt. The melt enthalpy ΔH or heat of fusion can be calculated by mathematical integration, i.e. the determination of the area between the baseline and the complete curve or parts thereof. This reflects the amount of heat necessary to completely or partially melt the sample.
Polymers herein are generally of the type of partially crystalline substances. Partially crystalline polymers are characterized in that a part thereof is solid crystals, while the rest is amorphous. The amorphous part behaves as a highly viscous liquid. Liquid parts of a polymer sample do not contribute to the melting process. The melting curve as detected by DSC reflects the melting behavior of the crystallites.
Number and size of the crystallites determine the density of polymers. LLDPE has a lower density compared with HDPE. Combining LLDPE and HDPE into a blend may have the advantage to broaden the melting curve. The melting curves of LLDPE are quite specifiable, depending on what type of LLDPE is regarded. As already mentioned, the co-monomer, the catalyst and the type of process layout have a great influence on the appearance of the melting curve. There are three types of processes for the preparation of LLDPE: slurry, solution and gas-phase. The slurry-process is underrepresented in this context, as very few LLDPE-types exist. But, it is the method of choice of the production of HDPE. LLDPE from solution processes is characterized in that mostly 1-octene acts as co-monomer in that process.
Contrariwise 1-hexene and 1-butene are the co-monomers used in gas-phase processes.
The composition of an example polymeric blend used for manufacturing of the textured (curled) monofilament yarn comprises:
The polymeric blends used for the manufacturing of the (texturized) filaments are characterized by a melting graph measured by DSC. The DSC method is widely used for thermal analysis. The method offers a fast and easy determination of phase transitions, e.g. melting, glass transition, and crystallization of polymer samples.
In a DSC analysis the energy is measured as a heat flow into or out of the sample. The vertical axis of a DSC plot is given in units of mW or mJ/s, whereas the horizontal axis shows the temperature in ° C. In a DSC run the sample is placed in a small metal pan and the measured against an empty metal pan. The temperature is raised (or lowered) at a constant rate dT/dt, mostly 10° C./min or 20° C./min and the pans are heated separately. When a phase transition occurs in the sample the uptake of energy (or the release of energy) is compensated by the furnace under the sample pan as long as necessary to maintain the heating (or cooling) rate and recorded as the energy flow. As the experiment is always done under constant pressure the energy flow is represented by a change in enthalpy ΔH. Then dH/dt equals Cp dT/dt, wherein Cp is the heat capacity of the sample.
The enthalpy of the complete melting process ΔH can be calculated by mathematical integration of the DSC trace, i.e. ΔH=∫(dH) dT. Therefor a baseline (which is not plotted automatically throughout a DSC run) is needed. This baseline has to be interpolated as flat baseline, when the DSC curve follows the same progression in the segments of the curve before and after the phase transition. However this is often not the case, because Cp may not be the same before and after the phase transition, moreover Cp can depend on temperature. In cases, where a step in Cp is present, an interpolation using sigmoid function is suitable for the construction of the baseline. The interpolation reflects the extent of progress of the transition. At each point of the interpolated baseline, i.e. each temperature in the region of the peak, difference in Cp is calculated by linear extrapolation of the left pre-transition side and the right post-transition side of the curve and then weighted by the extent of progress of the transition. Besides interpolation using sigmoid function interpolation using other functions like cubic of step functions can be used.
Once the baseline has been constructed, a left and a right limit for the integral must be defined, which gives rise to another discussion. When analyzing LLDPE with the DSC-method, the left limit is often hard to find in the temperature range between ambient and end of melting. This is because LLDPE may be partly melted at ambient temperatures. A cooling device and a purge gas device are necessary to extend the range to temperatures lower than ambient.
An example DSC graph is depicted in
Each peak of the curve 232 has the following characteristic temperatures:
a) Ts01 (Ts02) is a temperature at which the curve 233 starts to deviate from the base line 233. This temperature characterizes the beginning of the melting process;
b) Ts1 (Ts2) is a temperature characterizing substantial beginning of the melting process. At this temperature a substantial portion of the crystalline fraction of the first (second) polymer is molten. As usual this temperature is called a lower boundary of a melting range of a melting process or a melting point. The temperature Ts1 (Ts2) is a temperature at which the tangent line 227 (228) intersects the base line 233. The tangent line 227 (228) is a tangent to a left slope of the peak 230 (231). The tangent line has the same first derivative as the left slope of the peak at a temperature at which the left slope of the peak 230 (231) has its second derivative equal to zero;
c) Tm1 (Tm2) is a temperature at which the peak 230 (231) has its maximum. This temperature (as usual) indicates the temperature at which the melting process has the highest rate;
d) Tf1 (Tf2) is a temperature characterizing substantial ending of the melting process. At this temperature the crystalline fraction of the first (second) polymer is almost completely molten. As usual this temperature is called an upper boundary of the melting range of the melting process. The temperature Tf1 (Tf2) is a temperature at which the tangent line 226 (229) intersects the base line 233. The tangent line 226 (229) is a tangent to a right slope of the peak 230 (231). The tangent line has the same first derivative as the right slope of the peak at a temperature at which the right slope of the peak 230 (231) has its second derivative equal to zero;
e) Tf01 (Tf02) is a temperature at which the curve 233 starts to coincide with the base line 233. This temperature characterizes the complete end of the melting process. At this temperature the crystalline fraction of the first (second) polymer is completely molten.
The dashed line 233 is a base line of the DSC curve. The base line of the peak 230 is straight, because the melting of the crystalline fraction of the first polymer does not result in a change in the heat capacity (Cp) of the first polymer and as a result thereof in the change of the heat capacity of the polymer blend. The base line of the peak 231 is a sigmoidal baseline because the melting of the crystalline fraction of the second polymer results in a change in the specific heat capacity of the second polymer and as a result thereof in the specific heat capacity of the polymer blend. The sigmoidal base line can be any suitable sigmoidal function.
The parameters used for determination of a process window of texturing (curling) of the monofilament yarn can be derived using the following definitions and/or procedures.
First the DSC curve can be preprocessed. The contribution of the base line can be subtracted from the original DSC curve. In other words each value of the preprocessed DSC curve at a particular temperature is equal to a value of the original DSC curve at said temperature minus a value of the baseline curve at said temperature. For further steps, either the original or the preprocessed DSC curve can be used. In case when peaks of the DSC curve overlap, a deconvolution of the overlapping peaks can be performed in order to provide processing of each of the overlapping peaks in an independent way. Afterwards the temperatures specified in sections a)-e) are determined.
The lower (upper) boundary value of the temperature range for the texturing (curling) process can be one of the following temperatures: Ts01, Ts1, Tm1, Tf1, Tf01, Ts02, and Ts2 (Ts1, Tm1, Tf1, Tf01, Ts02, Ts2, Tm2), wherein the lower boundary value is less than the upper boundary value. For instance, the temperature range Tf01-Ts02 can be selected when it is required that the crystalline fraction of the first polymer is completely molten and the crystalline fraction of the second polymer is completely in the solid state in the process of the texturing (curling) of the monofilament yarn. Alternatively, the temperature range Tf01-Tm2 can be selected, when it is required that the crystalline fraction of the first polymer is completely molten and the crystalline fraction of the second polymer is partially molten in the process of the texturing (curling) of the monofilament yarn. As yet another alternative, the temperature range Tm1-Tf1 can be selected, when it is required that the crystalline fraction of the first polymer is partially molten and the crystalline fraction of the second polymer is completely in the solid state in the process of the texturing (curling) of the monofilament yarn. As yet another alternative Tm1 can be taken as a reference temperature TR for the texturing (curling) process. Since the temperature of the filaments should not fall below the reference temperature TR during the course of texturizing the filaments, a lower boundary and an upper boundary of the temperature range can be defined as follows: the lower boundary is equal to TR and the upper boundary is equal to a surplus temperature Ts, wherein the surplus temperature Ts being no more than a predetermined percentage larger than the lower boundary temperature in degrees Celsius, wherein the predetermined percentage is 15%, preferably 10%, and more preferably 5%.
Another example DSC graph is depicted in
Being not bound to the example curve depicted in
Deconvolution of the curve 411 results in the generation of two curves 412 and 413 each representing a respective peak. One curve (e.g. 412) is a characteristic of a melting process of one of the polymers of the blend, while the other curve (e.g. 413) is a characteristic of a melting process of the other polymer of the blend. As clearly seen from
The lower (upper) boundary value of the temperature range for the texturing (curling) process can be selected in the same way as described above.
Another example DSC graph is depicted in
In the example depicted in
Independent from a particular structure of a DSC curve (e.g. number of peaks, overlapping/non overlapping peaks, etc.) another approach can be used for determination of the temperature range used for texturing (curling) process. The lower boundary Tl of the temperature range is determined according to the following equation:
and the upper boundary Tu is determined according to the following equation:
Heat flow (T) is the original DSC curve (e.g. DSC curve 411 in
With independent of the particular temperature range selected as the temperature range of the texturing process the desired temperature can be determined as a middle temperature of the selected temperature range. The desired temperature is equal to an average of an upper boundary of the selected temperature range and the lower boundary of the selected temperature range. The desired temperature can be used as the setting of the controller 70, i.e. be used as the desired temperature therein. In addition or as alternative the desired temperature can be specified as the selected temperature range or a range within the selected temperature range (e.g. a subrange of the selected temperature range).
Process block 604 is executed after process block 602. In process block 604 one or more melting temperatures of the monofilament yarn are determined using the DSC data. The determination of the melting temperatures can be performed as described above, by determining baseline, temperatures corresponding to maxima of the DSC curve, etc. Afterwards the desired temperature of the texturing process is determined using the one or more melting temperatures. Process block 606 is executed after process block 604. In process block 606 the monofilament yarn is textured (curled) using the texturing device to provide the textured artificial yarn, the controller 70 is programmed to hold the actual temperature at the determined desired temperature. As it is mentioned above the melting temperature can be a melting temperature of a crystalline fraction of the polymer of the blend. In case with the polymer of the blend has polymorphism, then the melting temperature can be a melting temperature of one of its polymorphic modifications.
The desired temperature can be selected within the following temperature ranges, preferably in the middle of the respective temperature range within which the desired temperature is selected. The temperature range can selected such that a portion of a crystalline fraction of the polymer blend is in a solid state in a process of the texturing (curling) of the monofilament yarn and another portion of the crystalline fraction of the polymer blend is in a molten state. The lower boundary of such a temperature range can be any of the following temperatures depicted on
Alternatively, the temperature range can be selected such that a crystalline fraction of one of the polymers is in a solid state in a process of the texturing (curling) of the monofilament yarn and a crystalline fraction of another one of the polymers is in a molten state in the process of the texturing (curling) of the monofilament yarn. The upper boundary of such a temperature range can be Ts02 depicted in
The temperature range can have a lower boundary temperature being greater or equal to one of the melting temperatures, which can be lowest one of the melting temperatures determined in process block 604 (e.g. Tm3). The temperature range can have an upper boundary temperature being less or equal another one of the melting temperatures, which can be the highest one of the melting temperatures determined in process block 604 (e.g. Tm5). According to the DSC data obtained for different polymer blends (in particular for the polymer blend comprising LLDPE and HDPE) an optimal temperature range for texturing (curling) can be 90-110 degrees Celsius.
As it is mentioned above, DSC curves provide plenty of information for determination of the melting temperatures which are used for the determination of the temperature range of the texturing (curling) of the monofilament yarn. For instance, the melting temperature of the polymer can be determined as a minimum temperature at which only a portion of a crystalline fraction of the respective polymer is in a molten state (e.g. Ts1, Tm1, Tf1, Ts2, Tm2, Tf2, Ts3, Tm3, Tf3, Ts4, Tm4, Tf4, Ts5, Tm5, Tf5). In case when the polymer has polymorphism, the melting temperature can be determined as a minimum temperature at which only a portion of its polymorphic modification is in a molten state (e.g. Ts3, Tm3, Tf3 for the melting of the polymorphic modification which melting process corresponds to the peak 215 in
With independent of different approaches for selection/determination of the temperature range and/or the desired temperature for the texturing (curling) process, the temperature range and/or the desired temperature are selected such that only a portion of a crystalline fraction of the polymer blend in molten in the texturing (curling) process. With independent of the particular temperature range selected for the texturing process, the desired temperature can be determined as a middle temperature of the temperature range of the texturing process, i.e. as an average value of an upper boundary of the temperature range and lower boundary of the temperature range. In addition or as alternative the desired temperature can be determined as said temperature range or a range within the temperature range, wherein preferably the aforementioned average value is comprised in the range within the temperature range.
The texturing (curling) of the monofilament yarn can be performed for instance using any of the texturing (curling) devices depicted in
Turning back to
Another optional process block 608 can be executed after process block 606, preferably immediately after process block 608. The textured (curled) monofilament yarn is cooled. The cooling can be performed using a cooling godet 120. The cooling can an a quenching procedure, wherein the textured (curled) monofilament yarn can be cooled down to a temperature of 20-25 degrees Celsius within 1-5 seconds.
Process block 622 is executed after process block 620. In process block 622 the polymer blend is extruded into a monofilament yarn. This extrusion can be performed using the extruder 100 depicted in
Process block 624 is executed after process block 622. The filaments are (rapidly) cooled down to a temperature where crystallization can take place. In the crystallization process the crystallites are forming to a percentage, which depends on the cooling rate. The higher the cooling rate, the less is the crystallinity and vice versa. Process block 624 can be executed using the cooling device 97 depicted in
Process block 626 is executed after process block 624. In process block 626 the monofilament yarn is drawn e.g. to a factor of 4-6, i.e. the monofilament yarn is elongated 4-6 times. The preferred drawing ratio is 1:5.6. During the drawing process the monofilament yarn is heated to a temperature. The temperature can be at least 10-20 degrees Celsius (preferably 70-100 degrees Celsius for a polymer bled comprising Polyamide (PA) and/or Polyethylene (PET)) below the temperature of the last maximum on the DSC curve (e.g. Tm3 in
Process block 628 is executed after process block 626. In process block 628 the monofilament yarn is cooled again. This can be done in the same way as in process block 624. The cooling godet or cooling drum 116 can be used for performing the cooling in process block 628.
Process block 630 is executed after process block 628. In process block 630 the monofilament yarn is drawn e.g. to a factor of 1.1-1.3. The preferable drawing ratio is 1:1.2. During the drawing process the monofilament yarn is heated to a temperature. The temperature can be the same as in Process block 626. Process block 630 can be executed using the drawing device 118. Execution of process block 630 can result in relaxation of stress in the monofilament yarn.
The third of the first polymer can be a polar polymer. The third of the first polymer can be for instance polyamide. Alternatively the third or the first polymer can be polyethylene terephthalate or polybutylene terephthalate.
The polymer blend can comprise between 1% and 30% by weight the first polymer and the third polymer combined. In this example the balance of the weight may be made up by such components as the second polymer, the compatibilizer, and any other additional additives put into the polymer mixture.
Alternatively the polymer blend can comprise between 1 and 20% (or between 5% and 10%) by weight of the first polymer and the third polymer combined. Again, in this example the balance of the weight of the polymer mixture may be made up by the second polymer, the compatibilizer, and any other additional additives.
The polymer blend can comprise between 1% and 30% by weight the first polymer. In this example the balance of the weight may be made up for example by the second polymer, the compatibilizer, and any other additional additives.
Alternatively the polymer blend can comprises between 1% and 20% (or between 5% and 10%) by weight of the first polymer. In this example the balance of the weight may be made up by the second polymer, the compatibilizer, and any other additional additives mixed into the polymer mixture.
The second polymer can be a non-polar polymer. The second polymer can be polyethylene or polypropylene. The polymer blend can comprise between 80-90% by weight of the second polymer. In this example the balance of the weight may be made up by the first polymer, possibly the second polymer if it is present in the polymer mixture, the compatibilizer, and any other chemicals or additives added to the polymer mixture.
The polymer blend can further comprise any one of the following: a wax, a dulling agent, a ultraviolet stabilizer, a flame retardant, an anti-oxidant, a pigment, and combinations thereof. These listed additional components may be added to the polymer blend to give the artificial turf fibers made of the textured (curled) monofilament yarn other desired properties such as being flame retardant, having a green color so that the artificial turf more closely resembles grass and greater stability in sunlight.
The thread-like regions can be embedded in the second polymer of the textured (curled) monofilament yarn. The textured monofilament yarn can comprise a compatibilizer surrounding each of the thread-like regions and separating the first polymer from the second polymer. The thread-like regions can have a diameter of less than 20 (or 10) micrometer. Alternatively the thread-like regions can have a diameter of between 1 and 3 micrometer. The thread-like regions can have a length of less than 2 mm in longitudinal direction of the monofilament yarn.
The textured (curled) monofilament fiber can be used as artificial turf fiber for manufacturing of an artificial turf. The textured (curled) monofilament fiber can be incorporated into an artificial turf backing of the artificial turf. This can be implemented for instance by tufting or weaving the artificial turf fiber (i.e. the textured (curled) monofilament yarn) into the artificial turf backing. After the incorporation of the artificial turf fibers a further optional process can be performed, wherein the artificial turf fibers are bound to the artificial turf backing. For instance the artificial turf fibers may be glued or held in place by a coating or other material. Alternatively a liquid backing (e.g. latex or polyurethane) can be applied on the backside of the artificial turf backing such that the liquid backing wets the lower portions of the fiber and firmly includes the fiber after the solidification of the backing and thus causing a sufficient tuft lock.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17195136.1 | Oct 2017 | EP | regional |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP2018/077191 | 10/5/2018 | WO | 00 |
