Artificially rendering images using viewpoint interpolation and extrapolation

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11636637
  • Patent Number
    11,636,637
  • Date Filed
    Friday, March 22, 2019
    5 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 25, 2023
    a year ago
Abstract
Various embodiments of the present invention relate generally to mechanisms and processes relating to artificially rendering images using viewpoint interpolation and extrapolation. According to particular embodiments, a method includes applying a transform to estimate a path outside the trajectory between a first frame and a second frame, where the first frame includes a first image captured from a first location and the second frame includes a second image captured from a second location. The process also includes generating an artificially rendered image corresponding to a third location positioned on the path. The artificially rendered image is generated by interpolating a transformation from the first location to the third location and from the third location to the second location, gathering image information from the first frame and the second frame by transferring first image information from the first frame to the third frame and second image information from the second frame to the third frame, and combining the first image information and the second image information.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present disclosure relates to artificially rendering images using viewpoint interpolation and/or extrapolation.


DESCRIPTION OF RELATED ART

With modern computing platforms and technologies shifting towards mobile and wearable devices that include camera sensors as native acquisition input streams, the desire to record and preserve moments digitally in a different form than more traditional two-dimensional (2D) flat images and videos has become more apparent. Traditional digital media formats typically limit their viewers to a passive experience. For instance, a 2D flat image can be viewed from one angle and is limited to zooming in and out. Accordingly, traditional digital media formats, such as 2D flat images, do not easily lend themselves to reproducing memories and events with high fidelity.


Producing combined images, such as a panorama, or a three-dimensional (3D) image or model requires combining data from multiple images and can require interpolation or extrapolation of data. Most previously existing methods of interpolation or extrapolation require a significant amount of data in addition to the available image data. For those approaches, the additional data needs to describe the scene structure in a dense way, such as provided by a dense depth map (where for every pixel a depth value is stored) or an optical flow map (which stores for every pixel the motion vector between the available images). This limits the efficiency of these methods in processing speed as well as transfer rates when sending it over a network. Accordingly, improved mechanisms for interpolation and extrapolation are desirable.


OVERVIEW

Provided are various mechanisms and processes relating to artificially rendering images using viewpoint interpolation and extrapolation.


In one aspect, which may include at least a portion of the subject matter of any of the preceding and/or following examples and aspects, a method includes applying a transform to estimate a path outside the trajectory between a first frame and a second frame, where the first frame includes a first image captured from a first location and the second frame includes a second image captured from a second location. The process also includes generating an artificially rendered image corresponding to a third location positioned on the path. The artificially rendered image is generated by interpolating a transformation from the first location to the third location and from the third location to the second location, gathering image information from the first frame and the second frame by transferring first image information from the first frame to the third frame and second image information from the second frame to the third frame, and combining the first image information and the second image information.


In another aspect, which may include at least a portion of the subject matter of any of the preceding and/or following examples and aspects, a computer readable medium includes code for applying a transform to estimate a path outside the trajectory between a first frame and a second frame, where the first frame includes a first image captured from a first location and the second frame includes a second image captured from a second location. The computer readable medium also includes code for generating an artificially rendered image corresponding to a third location positioned on the path. The artificially rendered image is generated by interpolating a transformation from the first location to the third location and from the third location to the second location, gathering image information from the first frame and the second frame by transferring first image information from the first frame to the third frame and second image information from the second frame to the third frame, and combining the first image information and the second image information.


These and other embodiments are described further below with reference to the figures.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The disclosure may best be understood by reference to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, which illustrate particular embodiments of the present invention.



FIG. 1 illustrates an example of a configuration where an artificially rendered image is generated for a chosen viewpoint on a trajectory between two frames.



FIG. 2 illustrates an example of combining image information gathered from two frames to artificially render an image for another frame using weighted image information.



FIG. 3 illustrates an example of a process for generating an artificially rendered image from two frames.



FIG. 4 illustrates an example of combining image information gathered from two frames to artificially render an image in another frame using multiple layers extracted from surround views.



FIGS. 5A-5B illustrate an example of an image transformation between two frames using tracked control points between the two frames.



FIG. 6 illustrates an example of viewpoint extrapolation outside of the trajectory between two frames using multiple layers and the parallax effect.



FIG. 7 illustrates an example of a process for extrapolating a viewpoint outside the trajectory between two frames.



FIG. 8 illustrates an example of a process for interpolating a layer using a panoramic representation.



FIG. 9 illustrates an example of a process for generating an artificially rendered image from a surround view.



FIG. 10 illustrates a particular example of a computer system that can be used with various embodiments of the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Reference will now be made in detail to some specific examples of the invention including the best modes contemplated by the inventors for carrying out the invention. Examples of these specific embodiments are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. While the present disclosure is described in conjunction with these specific embodiments, it will be understood that it is not intended to limit the invention to the described embodiments. On the contrary, it is intended to cover alternatives, modifications, and equivalents as may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.


In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. Particular embodiments of the present invention may be implemented without some or all of these specific details. In other instances, well known process operations have not been described in detail in order not to unnecessarily obscure the present invention.


Various systems and methods for analyzing the spatial relationship between multiple images and video together with location information data, for the purpose of creating a single representation, a surround view, which eliminates redundancy in the data, and presents a user with an interactive and immersive active viewing experience, is described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/530,669 by Holzer et al., filed on Oct. 31, 2014, titled “Analysis and Manipulation of Images and Video for Generation of Surround Views,” which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety and for all purposes. According to various embodiments described therein, a surround view provides a user with the ability to control the viewpoint of the visual information displayed on a screen.


According to various embodiments, a surround view is a multi-view interactive digital media representation. The data used to generate a surround view can come from a variety of sources. In particular, data such as, but not limited to, two-dimensional (2D) images can be used to generate a surround view. These 2D images can include color image data streams such as multiple image sequences, video data, etc., or multiple images in any of various formats for images, depending on the application. Another source of data that can be used to generate a surround view includes location information. This location information can be obtained from sources such as accelerometers, gyroscopes, magnetometers, GPS, WiFi, IMU-like systems (Inertial Measurement Unit systems), and the like. Yet another source of data that can be used to generate a surround view can include depth images. These depth images can include depth, 3D, or disparity image data streams, and the like, and can be captured by devices such as, but not limited to, stereo cameras, time-of-flight cameras, three-dimensional cameras, and the like.


In the present example embodiment, the data can then be fused together. In some embodiments, a surround view can be generated by a combination of data that includes both 2D images and location information, without any depth images provided. In other embodiments, depth images and location information can be used together. Various combinations of image data can be used with location information, depending on the application and available data.


In the present example embodiment, the data that has been fused together is then used for content modeling and context modeling. According to various examples, the subject matter featured in the images can be separated into content and context. The content can be delineated as the object of interest and the context can be delineated as the scenery surrounding the object of interest. According to various embodiments, the content can be a three-dimensional model, depicting an object of interest, although the content can be a two-dimensional image in some embodiments. Furthermore, in some embodiments, the context can be a two-dimensional model depicting the scenery surrounding the object of interest. Although in many examples the context can provide two-dimensional views of the scenery surrounding the object of interest, the context can also include three-dimensional aspects in some embodiments. For instance, the context can be depicted as a “flat” image along a cylindrical “canvas,” such that the “flat” image appears on the surface of a cylinder. In addition, some examples may include three-dimensional context models, such as when some objects are identified in the surrounding scenery as three-dimensional objects. In various embodiments, the models provided by content modeling and context modeling can be generated by combining the image and location information data.


According to various embodiments, context and content of a surround view are determined based on a specified object of interest. In some examples, an object of interest is automatically chosen based on processing of the image and location information data. For instance, if a dominant object is detected in a series of images, this object can be selected as the content. In other examples, a user specified target can be chosen. It should be noted, however, that a surround view can be generated without a user specified target in some applications.


In the present example embodiment, one or more enhancement algorithms can be applied. In particular example embodiments, various algorithms can be employed during capture of surround view data, regardless of the type of capture mode employed. These algorithms can be used to enhance the user experience. For instance, automatic frame selection, stabilization, view interpolation, filters, and/or compression can be used during capture of surround view data. In some examples, these enhancement algorithms can be applied to image data after acquisition of the data. In other examples, these enhancement algorithms can be applied to image data during capture of surround view data.


According to various examples, view interpolation can be used to improve the viewing experience. In particular, to avoid sudden “jumps” between stabilized frames, synthetic, intermediate views can be rendered on the fly. This can be informed by content-weighted keypoint tracks and IMU information, as well as by denser pixel-to-pixel matches. If depth information is available, fewer artifacts resulting from mismatched pixels may occur, thereby simplifying the process. As described above, view interpolation can be applied during capture of a surround view in some embodiments. In other embodiments, view interpolation can be applied during surround view generation.


In the present embodiment, a surround view is generated after any enhancement algorithms are applied. The surround view can provide a multi-view interactive digital media representation. In various examples, the surround view can include a three-dimensional model of the content and a two-dimensional model of the context. However, in some examples, the context can represent a “flat” view of the scenery or background as projected along a surface, such as a cylindrical or other-shaped surface, such that the context is not purely two-dimensional. In yet other examples, the context can include three-dimensional aspects.


According to various embodiments, surround views provide numerous advantages over traditional two-dimensional images or videos. Some of these advantages include: the ability to cope with moving scenery, a moving acquisition device, or both; the ability to model parts of the scene in three-dimensions; the ability to remove unnecessary, redundant information and reduce the memory footprint of the output dataset; the ability to distinguish between content and context; the ability to use the distinction between content and context for improvements in the user-experience; the ability to use the distinction between content and context for improvements in memory footprint (an example would be high quality compression of content and low quality compression of context); the ability to associate special feature descriptors with surround views that allow the surround views to be indexed with a high degree of efficiency and accuracy; and the ability of the user to interact and change the viewpoint of the surround view. In particular example embodiments, the characteristics described above can be incorporated natively in the surround view representation, and provide the capability for use in various applications. For instance, surround views can be used to enhance various fields such as e-commerce, visual search, 3D printing, file sharing, user interaction, and entertainment.


As described above, view interpolation can be used to improve the viewing experience. In particular, to avoid sudden “jumps” between stabilized frames, synthetic, intermediate views can be rendered during acquisition or generation of a surround view. However, according to various embodiments, only a limited amount of image frames are stored for each surround view for storage efficiency. In some examples, the selection of these frames is based on the motion of the camera rather than on time. For instance, a new frame is sampled only if the camera moved sufficiently with respect to the previously sampled frame. Consequently, in order to provide a smooth viewing experience for a user interacting with a surround view, artificially rendered frames must be generated. These artificially rendered frames serve to close the gap between two sampled frames that would otherwise appear to have a “jump” between them. Accordingly, by generating these artificially rendered frames, smooth navigation within the surround view becomes possible.


Various embodiments described below include methods of viewpoint interpolation and extrapolation that can be used to generate artificially rendered frames. In various examples, interpolation between frames is performed along a path between the frames. In some instances, this path can follow a non-linear trajectory. In addition, various described extrapolation methods allow the artificially rendered frame to represent a view from a location that is not on the trajectory of the recording camera or in between two sampled frames. By providing interpolation and extrapolation methods for paths between or beyond the originally provided frames, various artificially rendered views can be provided for a surround view.


With reference to FIG. 1, shown is an example of a configuration where an artificially rendered image is generated for a viewpoint at Location X on a trajectory between Location A and Location B. In this example, a single transform for viewpoint interpolation is used along the trajectory between two frames, Frame A 102 and Frame B 104. As shown, Frame A 102 represents an image captured of objects 108 and 110 by a camera 112 located at Location A 122. Frame B 104 represents an image captured of object 108 by a camera 114 located at Location B 124. In the present example, the transformation (T_AB) is estimated between the two frames, where T_AB maps a pixel from frame A to frame B. This transformation is performed using methods such as homography, affine, similarity, translation, rotation, or scale.


In the present example, an artificially rendered image at Location X 126, which can also be denoted as a viewpoint position at x \in [0, 1] on the trajectory between frame A and B, where frame A is located at 0 and frame B at 1, is then generated by interpolating the transformation, gathering image information from Frames A and B, and combining the image information. In the present example, the transformation is interpolated (T_AX and T_XB). One way to interpolate this transformation is to parameterize the transformation T_AB and linearly interpolate those parameters. However, this interpolation is not limited to linear interpolations and other methods can be used within the scope of this disclosure. Next, image information is gathered from both Frames A and B by transferring image information from Frame A 102 to Frame X 106 based on T_AX and by transferring image information from Frame B 104 to Frame X 106 based on T_XB. Finally, the image information gathered from both Frames A and B is combined to generate an artificially rendered image at Location X 126.


In the present example, combining the image information gathered from both Frames A and B can be done in various ways. With reference to FIG. 2, shown is one example of a way to combine image information gathered from both Frames A and B to artificially render an image in Frame X using weighted image information. As shown, image information is taken from Frame A 202 and Frame B 204 to generate an image in Frame X 206. Image information in Region 208 of Frame X 206 is taken from Frame A. Image information in Region 210 of Frame X 206 is taken from Frame B. Image information in Region 210 of Frame X 206 includes information from both Frame A 202 and Frame B 204. In order to account for the overlap in information, the image information is weighted. Specifically, the information is combined using the image information from Frame A 202 using 1−x and the image information from Frame B 204 using x.


With reference to FIG. 3, shown is an example of a process for generating an artificially rendered image from two frames 300. In this example, a transformation is estimated between a first frame and a second frame at 302. The transformation is estimated using methods such as homography, affine, similarity, translation, rotation, or scale. As described above with regard to FIG. 1, the first frame includes a first image captured from a first location (Location A 122) and the second frame includes a second image captured from a second location (Location B 124). In some examples, the first image and second image are associated with the same layer. Next, an artificially rendered image is rendered corresponding to a third location. This third location is positioned on a trajectory between the first location and the second location, as shown as Location X 126 in FIG. 1.


The artificially rendered image is generated in a number of steps. First, a transformation is interpolated from the first location to the third location and from the third location to the second location at 304. In some instances, interpolating the transformation includes parameterizing the transformation from the first location to the third location and from the third location to the second location. Furthermore, in some examples, the parameterized transformation is then linearly interpolated.


Next, image information is gathered from the first frame and the second frame at 306 by transferring first image information from the first frame to the third frame based on the interpolated transformation and second image information from the second frame to the third frame based on the interpolated transformation. Finally, the first image information and the second image information is combined to yield the artificially rendered image. In some examples, combining the first image information and the second image information includes weighting the first image information from the first frame and the second image information from the second frame.


According to various embodiments, the process can end with combining the first image information and second image information at 308. However, according to the present example, the process shown continues with determining whether an occlusion is present in the artificially rendered image at 310. Such an occlusion is created by a change in layer placement between the first frame and second frame. Specifically, the first image and second image may include foregrounds and backgrounds that include one or more layers, each layer corresponding to a region of image pixels that share a similar motion, as described in more detail below with regard to FIG. 4. These layers can move relative to each other. In some cases, the layers may move in a manner causing an occlusion in a combined image. If an occlusion is detected, then the missing data is replaced to fill the first occlusion at 310. In some instances, the missing data is obtained by interpolation or extrapolation. In other instances, the missing data is obtained from the first frame or the second frame. In yet other instances, the missing data is obtained from another frame (separate from the first and second frame) that includes image information corresponding to the missing data. In another example, the missing data is obtained by extrapolating from surrounding image data. This surrounding image data includes information from frames located near the first location and second location.


With reference to FIG. 4, shown is an example of combining image information gathered from both Frames A and B to artificially render an image in Frame X by using multiple layers of an image. The present example uses the method described above with regard to FIG. 3, where the first frame and second frame are made up of two or more layers. In particular, the first frame, which includes a view at Time A 302, includes a background layer 306 and foreground layer 304. The second frame, which includes a view at Time B 308, includes a background layer 312 and foreground layer 310. In some examples, foreground and/or background can include one or more layer. In the present example, a layer is a region of image pixels that share a similar motion, based on factors such as depth and or speed of the corresponding real world object.


In the present example, viewpoint-interpolation can be used to generate an artificially rendered image as described above with regard to FIG. 3. In addition, because different motions of the layers can create occlusions and/or regions with missing data, the process can also include methods for filling the regions corresponding to any detected occlusions. Whether data is occluded or missing is based on the ordering of layers. Although the layers are expected to stay in the same order, they can switch order if the objects change their depth location within the scene. For instance, occlusions are created if a first layer moves in front of a second layer, where the first layer is closer to the camera than second layer. In the case that the first layer is non-see-through, image information from the first layer is taken wherever the first and second layer overlap. In the case that the first layer is partially see-through, image information is taken from both layers according to the opacity of the first layer. This process can also be extended to more than two layers.


As described above with regard to FIG. 3, missing information can be obtained in various ways, including interpolation or extrapolation. For instance, missing data can be taken from only one of the frames, depending on which frame includes a view of the missing data. In another example, the missing data can be taken from other frames where this region is visible. For instance, in a surround view that includes various frames and viewpoints, other frames can be used to fill in this missing data. In another example, the missing data can be extrapolated from surrounding image data, to create artificial image data that estimates what the missing data would look like. In yet another example, viewpoint-extrapolation using multiple layers can be applied outside of the trajectory between the two frames, by moving the different layers in perpendicular motion to the trajectory motion, as shown in more detail with regard to FIG. 6. According to various examples, the transform between the two frames can be an image transformation or a 3D transformation. An image transformation can use methods such as homography, affine, similarity, translation, rotation, scale. For a 3D transformation, layers are moved with respect to their depth and the 3D transformation, according to various embodiments.


With reference to FIGS. 5A-5B, shown is an example of an image transformation between two frames using tracked control points between the two frames. In particular, FIG. 5A shows a first frame of a scene at a first time T1 and FIG. 5B shows a second frame of the scene at a second time T2. A set of control points 502, 504, 506, 508, 510, and 512 are tracked between the two frames, such that their locations are known in both frames. An intermediate frame X at x \in [0, 1] between these two frames can be generated by interpolating the location of all control points individually for x and then computing the image data for frame X by interpolating all pixel locations using those control points. In some examples, the set of control points are located within a single layer that includes particular objects viewable in the first frame and second frame. In this case, generating an artificially rendered image may include interpolating image data for multiple layers and combining these layers. In other example, each pixel in the first frame corresponds to a control point in the set of control points. Accordingly, each pixel is tracked and interpolated in that instance.


In the present embodiment, an artificially rendered image is generated as intermediate frame X by tracking a set of control points between the first frame and the second frame, and interpolating individual control points for the third location X using the set of control points and interpolating pixel locations using the individual control points. As shown, the first frame includes a first image captured from a first location and the second frame includes a second image captured from a second location. In one example, interpolating the pixel locations includes interpolation using barycentric coordinates based on three or more control points. In another example, interpolating the pixel locations includes interpolation using splines. In yet another example, interpolating the pixel locations includes interpolation using finite elements. In yet another example, interpolating the pixel locations includes using motion of the nearest control point. In some examples, interpolating pixel locations using the individual control points includes using dense optical flow. In other examples, interpolating pixel locations using the individual control points includes using depth data.


With reference to FIG. 6, shown is an example of viewpoint extrapolation outside of the trajectory between two frames using multiple layers and the parallax effect. Using multiple layers, viewpoint-extrapolation outside of a trajectory between two frames can be achieved by moving the different layers in perpendicular motion to the trajectory motion. As shown, a scene 408 includes multiple layers Layer A 402, Layer B 404, and Layer C 406. Although not shown, two frames capturing images of the scene 408 can be obtained by moving a camera along camera motion 416. Comparing the two images will show parallax motion in the direction 412. As shown in the figure, the amount of parallax motion 410 of each of the layers can indicate movement or differences between the frames. Although not indicated in the figure, the different layers 402, 404, and 406 can each have different amounts of parallax motion.


In the present embodiment an artificially rendered image is generated using this parallax effect. In particular, a set of control points (not shown) is moved perpendicular to a trajectory between a first frame and a second frame. In this example, the first frame includes a first image captured from a first location and the second frame includes a second image captured from a second location and each control point is moved based on an associated depth of the control point. Specifically, control points located at a further depth are moved less than control points at a closer depth in some examples. Additionally, in some applications, each pixel in the first image corresponds to a control point in the set of control points. Furthermore, in addition to having a concrete depth associated with a point, it is also possible to infer the depth from the amount of frame-to-frame motion of the control points.


Next, an artificially rendered image corresponding to a third location outside of the trajectory is generated by extrapolating individual control points using the set of control points for the third location and extrapolating pixel locations using the individual control points. In some examples, extrapolating the pixel locations includes extrapolation using barycentric coordinates based on three or more control points. In other examples, extrapolating the pixel locations includes extrapolation using splines. In yet other examples, extrapolating the pixel locations includes extrapolation using finite elements. In other instances, extrapolating the pixel locations includes using motion of a nearest control point. In yet other instances, extrapolating pixel locations using the individual control points includes using dense optical flow.


With reference to FIG. 7, shown is an example of a process for extrapolating a viewpoint outside the trajectory between two frames. This process can be viewed as an extension to the process described with regard to FIG. 3, where viewpoints for locations outside of the trajectory between Frame A and Frame B are extrapolated by applying a transform which warps the image according the curvature and direction of the estimated path.


In the present embodiment, a transform is applied to estimate a path outside the trajectory between a first frame and a second frame at 702. The first frame includes a first image captured from a first location and the second frame includes a second image captured from a second location. In some examples, the first image and second image are associated with the same layer. Furthermore, this process can be applied to various layers and the resulting images representing the layers can be combined to generate a complete image. Next, an artificially rendered image corresponding to a third location positioned on the path is generated. The artificially rendered image is generated by first interpolating a transformation from the first location to the third location and from the third location to the second location at 704. Image information is then gathered from the first frame and the second frame at 706 by transferring first image information from the first frame to the third frame based on the interpolated transformation and second image information from the second frame to the third frame based on the interpolated transformation. Finally, the first image information and the second image information is combined at 708.


According to present embodiment, the transform can implement various features. For instance, the transform can implement features such as homography, spherical projection, and/or cylindrical projection. These features can be used alone or in conjunction with one another in applying the transform. Additional features not mentioned can also be implemented within the scope of this disclosure.


The present embodiment describes one method of extrapolating a viewpoint outside the trajectory between two frames. However, additional methods for extrapolating such viewpoints can also be implemented in other embodiments. For instance, as described above with regard to FIG. 6, another way to extrapolate viewpoints for locations outside of the trajectory between two frames can include moving the layers and/or control points perpendicular to the trajectory direction based on their depth. Specifically, layers/control points at greater depth are moved less than layers/control points at lesser depth. Depending on the characteristics of the frames, different methods can be chosen to provide an appropriate result.


With reference to FIG. 8, shown is an example of a process for interpolating a layer using a panoramic representation. In this example, the span of a layer is not restricted to two frames but is constructed from multiple frames. Specifically, a panorama is created from the corresponding background regions and combined into a panoramic representation. This panorama representation is then used to interpolate the corresponding layer. Although this process is described in terms of a background layer, this process can also be extended to other types of layers. For instance, the process can be applied to layers that include objects, such as context layers.


In the present embodiment, a set of control points is tracked between multiple frames associated with the same layer at 802. In some examples, each pixel corresponds to a control point in the set of control points. In these cases, each pixel is then interpolated based on the set of control points for the artificially rendered image. Next, a panoramic representation is generated from the multiple frames at 804. Individual control points are then interpolated from the set of control points at 806 for a desired frame or layer. Pixel locations are then interpolated for this frame or layer using the individual control points at 808. From this interpolation, the artificially rendered image/layer is generated.


According to various embodiments, interpolation can be implemented using a variety of methods. For instance, interpolating the pixel locations can include interpolation using barycentric coordinates based on three or more control points. In some examples, interpolating the pixel locations includes interpolation using splines. In other examples, interpolating the pixel locations includes interpolation using finite elements. In yet other examples, interpolating the pixel locations includes using motion of a nearest control point. In addition, interpolating pixel locations using the individual control points includes using dense optical flow in some applications. Although particular examples of interpolation methods are described, any combination of these or other methods can be used.


With reference to FIG. 9, shown is an example of a process for generating an artificially rendered image from a surround view. As described previously, a surround view is a multi-view interactive digital media representation. In some examples, the surround view is generated from multiple images having location information, and at least a portion of overlapping subject matter. Furthermore, according to various embodiments, the surround view is generated by interpolating between the multiple images and/or extrapolating data from the multiple images. In the present example, a surround view can be decomposed into one or more background panoramic representations and, in some examples, one or more foreground 3D models. An image at a specific viewpoint is then rendered by projecting the 3D model(s) and the panoramic representation(s) into a frame according to the current viewpoint and the depth and orientation of the 3D model(s).


In the present embodiment, a content model is obtained from a surround view at 902. This content model is a foreground three-dimensional model including at least one object. In some examples, obtaining the content model from the surround view includes extracting the content model from the surround view. At 904, a context model is obtained from the surround view. This context model is a background panoramic representation including scenery surrounding any objects in the content model. In some examples, obtaining the context model from the surround view includes extracting the context model from the surround view. Next, the content model is projected into a frame corresponding to a desired viewpoint at 906. The context model is also projected into the frame corresponding to the desired viewpoint at 908. According to various embodiments, the content model and context model are projected according to the depth and orientation of the content model. The artificially rendered image at the desired viewpoint is generated from a combination of the projected content and context at at 910.


Various examples of viewpoint interpolation and extrapolation are described in the present disclosure. According to various embodiments, one or a combination of methods can be used to generate a single artificially rendered image. For instance, one layer can be handled using the method described with regard to FIG. 3, another layer can be handled using the method described with regard to FIGS. 5A-5B, and a background layer can be handled using the method described with regard to FIG. 8. Any combination of methods can be used within the scope of this disclosure. Additionally, any one method can be used alone to generate an artificially rendered image.


The methods presented in this disclosure are highly efficient and can be run on a mobile platform in real-time. The various methods require only very small amounts of additional data and are therefore extremely well-suited for data that needs to be sent over a wireless network (e.g. LTE). In addition, the methods are sufficiently regularized to handle problematic cases without creating jarring artifacts. Accordingly, the methods described herein are suitable for generating artificially rendered images on mobile devices, etc.


Various computing devices can implement the methods described. For instance, a mobile device, computer system, etc. can be used to generate artificially rendered images. With reference to FIG. 10, shown is a particular example of a computer system that can be used to implement particular examples of the present invention. For instance, the computer system 1000 can be used to provide generate artificially rendered images according to various embodiments described above. In addition, the computer system 1000 shown can represent a computing system on a mobile device. According to particular example embodiments, a system 1000 suitable for implementing particular embodiments of the present invention includes a processor 1001, a memory 1003, an interface 1011, and a bus 1015 (e.g., a PCI bus). The interface 1011 may include separate input and output interfaces, or may be a unified interface supporting both operations. When acting under the control of appropriate software or firmware, the processor 1001 is responsible for such tasks such as optimization. Various specially configured devices can also be used in place of a processor 1001 or in addition to processor 1001. The complete implementation can also be done in custom hardware. The interface 1011 is typically configured to send and receive data packets or data segments over a network. Particular examples of interfaces the device supports include Ethernet interfaces, frame relay interfaces, cable interfaces, DSL interfaces, token ring interfaces, and the like.


In addition, various very high-speed interfaces may be provided such as fast Ethernet interfaces, Gigabit Ethernet interfaces, ATM interfaces, HSSI interfaces, POS interfaces, FDDI interfaces and the like. Generally, these interfaces may include ports appropriate for communication with the appropriate media. In some cases, they may also include an independent processor and, in some instances, volatile RAM. The independent processors may control such communications intensive tasks as packet switching, media control and management.


According to particular example embodiments, the system 1000 uses memory 1003 to store data and program instructions and maintain a local side cache. The program instructions may control the operation of an operating system and/or one or more applications, for example. The memory or memories may also be configured to store received metadata and batch requested metadata.


Because such information and program instructions may be employed to implement the systems/methods described herein, the present invention relates to tangible, machine readable media that include program instructions, state information, etc. for performing various operations described herein. Examples of machine-readable media include hard disks, floppy disks, magnetic tape, optical media such as CD-ROM disks and DVDs; magneto-optical media such as optical disks, and hardware devices that are specially configured to store and perform program instructions, such as read-only memory devices (ROM) and programmable read-only memory devices (PROMs). Examples of program instructions include both machine code, such as produced by a compiler, and files containing higher level code that may be executed by the computer using an interpreter.


Although many of the components and processes are described above in the singular for convenience, it will be appreciated by one of skill in the art that multiple components and repeated processes can also be used to practice the techniques of the present disclosure.


While the present disclosure has been particularly shown and described with reference to specific embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that changes in the form and details of the disclosed embodiments may be made without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. It is therefore intended that the invention be interpreted to include all variations and equivalents that fall within the true spirit and scope of the present invention.

Claims
  • 1. A method comprising: obtaining a content model from a surround view, wherein the surround view is a multi-view interactive digital media representation and the content model is a foreground three-dimensional model including at least one object, wherein the content model comprises one or more layers;obtaining a context model from the surround view, wherein the context model is a background panoramic representation including scenery surrounding the at least one object, wherein the context model comprises one or more layers; andgenerating an artificially rendered image corresponding to a first viewpoint by projecting the content model into a first frame corresponding to the first viewpoint and projecting the panoramic representation into the first frame, wherein the artificially rendered image is generated by moving different layers in different motions, wherein generating the artificially rendered image includes generating using viewpoint-interpolation and any missing information is filled in using viewpoint-extrapolation, wherein viewpoint-extrapolation is achieved by moving different layers in a motion perpendicular to the trajectory from the first frame to a second frame.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein obtaining the content model from the surround view includes extracting the content model from the surround view.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein obtaining the context model from the surround view includes extracting the context model from the surround view.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the content model and context model are projected according to the depth and orientation of the content model.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the surround view is generated from a plurality of images having location information, wherein the plurality of images include at least a portion of overlapping subject matter.
  • 6. The method of claim 5, wherein the surround view is generated by interpolating data between the plurality of images.
  • 7. The method of claim 5, wherein the surround view is generated by extrapolating data from the plurality of images.
  • 8. A system comprising: a processor; andmemory, the memory storing instructions to execute a method, the method comprising: obtaining a content model from a surround view, wherein the surround view is a multi-view interactive digital media representation and the content model is a foreground three-dimensional model including at least one object, wherein the content model comprises one or more layers;obtaining a context model from the surround view, wherein the context model is a background panoramic representation including scenery surrounding the at least one object, wherein the context model comprises one or more layers; andgenerating an artificially rendered image corresponding to a first viewpoint by projecting the content model into a first frame corresponding to the first viewpoint and projecting the panoramic representation into the first frame, wherein the artificially rendered image is generated by moving different layers in different motions, wherein generating the artificially rendered image includes generating using viewpoint-interpolation and any missing information is filled in using viewpoint-extrapolation, wherein viewpoint-extrapolation is achieved by moving different layers in a motion perpendicular to the trajectory from the first frame to a second frame.
  • 9. The system of claim 8, wherein obtaining the content model from the surround view includes extracting the content model from the surround view.
  • 10. The system of claim 8, wherein obtaining the context model from the surround view includes extracting the context model from the surround view.
  • 11. The system of claim 8, wherein the content model and context model are projected according to the depth and orientation of the content model.
  • 12. The system of claim 8, wherein the surround view is generated from a plurality of images having location information, wherein the plurality of images include at least a portion of overlapping subject matter.
  • 13. The system of claim 12, wherein the surround view is generated by interpolating data between the plurality of images.
  • 14. The system of claim 12, wherein the surround view is generated by extrapolating data from the plurality of images.
  • 15. A non-transitory computer readable medium storing instructions to execute a method, the method comprising: obtaining a content model from a surround view, wherein the surround view is a multi-view interactive digital media representation and the content model is a foreground three-dimensional model including at least one object, wherein the content model comprises one or more layers;obtaining a context model from the surround view, wherein the context model is a background panoramic representation including scenery surrounding the at least one object, wherein the context model comprises one or more layers; andgenerating an artificially rendered image corresponding to a first viewpoint by projecting the content model into a first frame corresponding to the first viewpoint and projecting the panoramic representation into the first frame, wherein the artificially rendered image is generated by moving different layers in different motions, wherein generating the artificially rendered image includes generating using viewpoint-interpolation and any missing information is filled in using viewpoint-extrapolation, wherein viewpoint-extrapolation is achieved by moving different layers in a motion perpendicular to the trajectory from the first frame to a second frame.
  • 16. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 15, wherein obtaining the content model from the surround view includes extracting the content model from the surround view.
  • 17. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 15, wherein obtaining the context model from the surround view includes extracting the context model from the surround view.
  • 18. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 15, wherein the content model and context model are projected according to the depth and orientation of the content model.
  • 19. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 15, wherein the surround view is generated from a plurality of images having location information, wherein the plurality of images include at least a portion of overlapping subject matter.
  • 20. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 15, wherein the surround view is generated by interpolating data between a plurality of images.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/800,640, filed on Jul. 15, 2015, entitled, “ARTIFICIALLY RENDERING IMAGES USING VIEWPOINT INTERPOLATION AND EXTRAPOLATION,” which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety for all purposes.

US Referenced Citations (522)
Number Name Date Kind
2534821 Ifield Dec 1950 A
5495576 Ritchey Feb 1996 A
5557684 Wang Sep 1996 A
5613048 Chen et al. Mar 1997 A
5613056 Gasper Mar 1997 A
5694533 Richards Dec 1997 A
5706417 Adelson Jan 1998 A
5847714 Naqvi Dec 1998 A
5850352 Moezzi et al. Dec 1998 A
5926190 Turkowski et al. Jul 1999 A
6031564 Ma et al. Feb 2000 A
6080063 Khosla Jun 2000 A
6185343 Ikeda Feb 2001 B1
6252974 Martens et al. Jun 2001 B1
6266068 Kang Jul 2001 B1
6281903 Martin et al. Aug 2001 B1
6327381 Rogina et al. Dec 2001 B1
6385245 De Haan May 2002 B1
6504569 Jasinschi et al. Jan 2003 B1
6522787 Kumar Feb 2003 B1
6778207 Lee et al. Aug 2004 B1
6814889 James Nov 2004 B1
6975756 Slabaugh Dec 2005 B1
7167180 Shibolet Jan 2007 B1
7593000 Chin Sep 2009 B1
7631261 Williams Dec 2009 B2
7631277 Nie Dec 2009 B1
8078004 Kang et al. Dec 2011 B2
8094928 Graepel Jan 2012 B2
8160391 Zhu Apr 2012 B1
8244069 Bourdev Aug 2012 B1
8401276 Choe et al. Mar 2013 B1
8503826 Klimenko Aug 2013 B2
8504842 Meacham Aug 2013 B1
8515982 Hickman Aug 2013 B1
8589069 Lehman Nov 2013 B1
8682097 Steinberg et al. Mar 2014 B2
8803912 Fouts Aug 2014 B1
8817071 Wang Aug 2014 B2
8819525 Holmer Aug 2014 B1
8866841 Distler Oct 2014 B1
8942917 Chrysanthakopoulos Jan 2015 B2
8947452 Ballagh et al. Feb 2015 B1
8947455 Friesen Feb 2015 B2
8963855 Chen et al. Feb 2015 B2
8966356 Hickman Feb 2015 B1
9024970 Lynch May 2015 B2
9027117 Wilairat May 2015 B2
9043222 Kerr May 2015 B1
9070402 Burtnyk Jun 2015 B2
9094670 Furio Jul 2015 B1
9129179 Wong Sep 2015 B1
9317881 Ledterman Apr 2016 B1
9325899 Chou et al. Apr 2016 B1
9367951 Gray et al. Jun 2016 B1
9390250 Kim et al. Jul 2016 B2
9400595 Li et al. Jul 2016 B2
9407816 Sehn Aug 2016 B1
9412203 Garcia, III et al. Aug 2016 B1
9472161 Ho Oct 2016 B1
9621768 Lyon Apr 2017 B1
9704257 Tuzel Jul 2017 B1
9734586 Luo et al. Aug 2017 B2
9865033 Jafarzadeh et al. Jan 2018 B1
9865058 Mullins Jan 2018 B2
9865069 Saporta Jan 2018 B1
9886771 Chen Feb 2018 B1
9898742 Higgins et al. Feb 2018 B2
9904056 Raghoebardajal Feb 2018 B2
9910505 Park et al. Mar 2018 B2
9928544 Hasan Mar 2018 B1
9940541 Holzer et al. Apr 2018 B2
9968257 Burt May 2018 B1
9998663 Francois Jun 2018 B1
10055882 Marin Aug 2018 B2
10147211 Holzer et al. Dec 2018 B2
10157333 Wang Dec 2018 B1
10176592 Holzer et al. Jan 2019 B2
10176636 Neustein Jan 2019 B1
10204448 Hazeghi Feb 2019 B2
10222932 Holzer et al. Mar 2019 B2
10242474 Holzer Mar 2019 B2
10262426 Holzer Apr 2019 B2
10275935 Holzer Apr 2019 B2
10284794 Francois May 2019 B1
10306203 Goyal May 2019 B1
10360601 Adegan Jul 2019 B1
10373260 Haller, Jr. Aug 2019 B1
10382739 Rusu Aug 2019 B1
10430995 Holzer Oct 2019 B2
10574974 Arora Feb 2020 B2
10657647 Chen May 2020 B1
10668965 Czinger Jun 2020 B2
10719939 Holzer Jul 2020 B2
10725609 Holzer Jul 2020 B2
10726560 Holzer Jul 2020 B2
10748313 Holzer Aug 2020 B2
10750161 Holzer Aug 2020 B2
10818029 Holzer Oct 2020 B2
10846913 Holzer Nov 2020 B2
10852902 Holzer Dec 2020 B2
11006095 Holzer May 2021 B2
11055534 Beall Jul 2021 B2
20010014172 Baba Aug 2001 A1
20020024517 Yamaguchi et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020094125 Guo Jul 2002 A1
20020190991 Efran et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030086002 Cahill et al. May 2003 A1
20030137517 Kondo Jul 2003 A1
20030185456 Sato Oct 2003 A1
20030231179 Suzuki Dec 2003 A1
20040085335 Burlnyk May 2004 A1
20040104935 Williamson et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040141014 Kamiwada et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040184013 Raskar et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040222987 Chang et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040239699 Uyttendaele Dec 2004 A1
20050018045 Thomas Jan 2005 A1
20050041842 Frakes Feb 2005 A1
20050046645 Breton Mar 2005 A1
20050119550 Serra Jun 2005 A1
20050151759 Gonzalez-banos et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050186548 Tomlinson Aug 2005 A1
20050219264 Shum et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050226502 Cohen et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050232467 Mohri et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050232510 Blake Oct 2005 A1
20050253877 Thompson Nov 2005 A1
20050283075 Ma Dec 2005 A1
20050285874 Zitnick, III et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060028552 Aggarwal Feb 2006 A1
20060188147 Rai et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060193535 Mishima et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060250505 Gennetten et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060256109 Acker Nov 2006 A1
20070008312 Zhou et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070058880 Lienard Mar 2007 A1
20070064802 Paniconi Mar 2007 A1
20070070069 Samarasekera Mar 2007 A1
20070110338 Snavely et al. May 2007 A1
20070118801 Harshbarger May 2007 A1
20070126928 Klompnhouwer Jun 2007 A1
20070159487 Felt Jul 2007 A1
20070237420 Steedly et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070237422 Zhou Oct 2007 A1
20070252804 Engel et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070269054 Takagi Nov 2007 A1
20080025588 Zhang Jan 2008 A1
20080033641 Medalia Feb 2008 A1
20080106593 Arfvidsson et al. May 2008 A1
20080151106 Verburgh Jun 2008 A1
20080152258 Tulkki Jun 2008 A1
20080198159 Liu Aug 2008 A1
20080201734 Lyon et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080225132 Inaguma Sep 2008 A1
20080232716 Plagne Sep 2008 A1
20080246759 Summers Oct 2008 A1
20080266142 Sula Oct 2008 A1
20080278569 Rotem et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080313014 Fell et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090003725 Merkel Jan 2009 A1
20090046160 Hayashi Feb 2009 A1
20090077161 Hamilton, II Mar 2009 A1
20090087029 Coleman Apr 2009 A1
20090116732 Zhou et al. May 2009 A1
20090141130 Ortiz Jun 2009 A1
20090144173 Mo et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090153549 Lynch Jun 2009 A1
20090160934 Hendrickson et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090163185 Lim Jun 2009 A1
20090174709 Kozlak Jul 2009 A1
20090208062 Sorek Aug 2009 A1
20090262074 Nasiri et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090263045 Szeliski et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090274391 Arcas Nov 2009 A1
20090276805 Andrews, II et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090303343 Drimbarean et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100007715 Lai Jan 2010 A1
20100017181 Mouton Jan 2010 A1
20100026788 Ishikawa Feb 2010 A1
20100033553 Levy Feb 2010 A1
20100060793 Oz Mar 2010 A1
20100079667 Turetken et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100098258 Thorn Apr 2010 A1
20100100492 Law Apr 2010 A1
20100110069 Yuan May 2010 A1
20100111444 Coffman May 2010 A1
20100164990 Van Doorn Jul 2010 A1
20100171691 Cook et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100188584 Liu et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100215251 Klein Gunnewiek et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100225743 Florencio Sep 2010 A1
20100231593 Zhou Sep 2010 A1
20100259595 Trimeche et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100266172 Shlomi Oct 2010 A1
20100305857 Byrne Dec 2010 A1
20100315412 Sinha et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100329542 Ramalingam Dec 2010 A1
20110007072 Khan et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110033170 Ikeda Feb 2011 A1
20110034103 Fong Feb 2011 A1
20110040539 Szymczyk et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110043604 Peleg et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110064388 Brown Mar 2011 A1
20110074926 Khan Mar 2011 A1
20110090344 Gefen Apr 2011 A1
20110105192 Jung May 2011 A1
20110109618 Nowak May 2011 A1
20110109726 Hwang May 2011 A1
20110115886 Nguyen May 2011 A1
20110141141 Kankainen Jun 2011 A1
20110141227 Bigioi et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110142289 Barenbrug Jun 2011 A1
20110142343 Kim Jun 2011 A1
20110170789 Amon et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110173565 Ofek Jul 2011 A1
20110179373 Moore Jul 2011 A1
20110193941 Inaba et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110214072 Lindemann Sep 2011 A1
20110234750 Lai Sep 2011 A1
20110248987 Mitchell Oct 2011 A1
20110254835 Segal Oct 2011 A1
20110261050 Smolic Oct 2011 A1
20110288858 Gay Nov 2011 A1
20110313653 Lindner Dec 2011 A1
20110316963 Li Dec 2011 A1
20120007713 Nasiri et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120013711 Tamir et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120017147 Mark Jan 2012 A1
20120019557 Aronsson et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120028706 Raitt et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120041722 Quan et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120057006 Joseph Mar 2012 A1
20120062756 Tian Mar 2012 A1
20120075411 Matsumoto Mar 2012 A1
20120092348 Mccutchen Apr 2012 A1
20120095323 Eskandari Apr 2012 A1
20120099804 Aguilera Apr 2012 A1
20120127172 Wu et al. May 2012 A1
20120127270 Zhang et al. May 2012 A1
20120139918 Michail et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120147224 Takayama Jun 2012 A1
20120148162 Zhang et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120162223 Hirai et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120162253 Collins Jun 2012 A1
20120167146 Incorvia Jun 2012 A1
20120198317 Eppolito Aug 2012 A1
20120207308 Sung Aug 2012 A1
20120212579 Frojdh et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120236201 Larsen Sep 2012 A1
20120240035 Gaucas Sep 2012 A1
20120242798 Mcardle Sep 2012 A1
20120257025 Kim Oct 2012 A1
20120257065 Velarde et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120258436 Lee Oct 2012 A1
20120262580 Huebner Oct 2012 A1
20120287123 Starner Nov 2012 A1
20120293632 Yukich Nov 2012 A1
20120294549 Doepke Nov 2012 A1
20120300019 Yang Nov 2012 A1
20120301044 Nakada Nov 2012 A1
20120314027 Tian Dec 2012 A1
20120314040 Kopf Dec 2012 A1
20120314899 Cohen et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130002649 Wu et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130016102 Look Jan 2013 A1
20130016897 Cho et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130018881 Bhatt Jan 2013 A1
20130044191 Matsumoto Feb 2013 A1
20130050573 Syed Feb 2013 A1
20130057644 Stefanoski et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130063549 Schnyder et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130071012 Leichsenring Mar 2013 A1
20130076619 Carr et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130113830 Suzuki May 2013 A1
20130120581 Daniels May 2013 A1
20130127844 Koeppel May 2013 A1
20130127847 Jin May 2013 A1
20130129304 Feinson May 2013 A1
20130141530 Zavesky Jun 2013 A1
20130147795 Kim Jun 2013 A1
20130147905 Janahan Jun 2013 A1
20130154926 Kim et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130155180 Wantland Jun 2013 A1
20130162634 Baik Jun 2013 A1
20130162787 Cho Jun 2013 A1
20130176392 Carr et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130195350 Tanaka et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130204411 Clark et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130208900 Vincent Aug 2013 A1
20130212538 Lemire Aug 2013 A1
20130219357 Reitan Aug 2013 A1
20130240628 Van Der Merwe Sep 2013 A1
20130250045 Ki et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130271566 Chen et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130278596 Wu et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130314442 Langlotz et al. Nov 2013 A1
20140002440 Lynch Jan 2014 A1
20140002472 Sobeski Jan 2014 A1
20140009462 Mcnamer et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140013414 Bruck Jan 2014 A1
20140023341 Wang Jan 2014 A1
20140037198 Larlus-larrondo et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140040742 Hyekyung Feb 2014 A1
20140049607 Amon et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140059674 Sun et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140063005 Ahn et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140078136 Sohn et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140087877 Krishnan Mar 2014 A1
20140092259 Tsang Apr 2014 A1
20140100995 Koshy Apr 2014 A1
20140107888 Quast Apr 2014 A1
20140118479 Rapoport May 2014 A1
20140118483 Rapoport May 2014 A1
20140118494 Wu et al. May 2014 A1
20140125659 Yoshida May 2014 A1
20140132594 Gharpure May 2014 A1
20140152834 Kosseifi Jun 2014 A1
20140153832 Kwatra et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140177927 Shieh Jun 2014 A1
20140192155 Choi et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140198184 Stein Jul 2014 A1
20140199050 Khalsa Jul 2014 A1
20140211989 Ding et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140225930 Durmek Aug 2014 A1
20140232634 Piemonte Aug 2014 A1
20140253436 Petersen Sep 2014 A1
20140253746 Voss et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140267616 Krig Sep 2014 A1
20140275704 Zhang Sep 2014 A1
20140286566 Rhoads Sep 2014 A1
20140293004 Tsubaki Oct 2014 A1
20140293028 Nguyen Oct 2014 A1
20140297798 Bakalash Oct 2014 A1
20140307045 Richardt et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140340404 Wang et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140362198 Nakayama Dec 2014 A1
20140365888 Curzon Dec 2014 A1
20140375684 Algreatly Dec 2014 A1
20150009130 Motta Jan 2015 A1
20150010218 Bayer Jan 2015 A1
20150016714 Chui Jan 2015 A1
20150022518 Takeshita Jan 2015 A1
20150042812 Tang Feb 2015 A1
20150046875 Xu Feb 2015 A1
20150073570 Dagoberto Mar 2015 A1
20150078449 Diggins et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150193963 Diggins Mar 2015 A1
20150294492 Diggins Mar 2015 A1
20150097961 Ure Apr 2015 A1
20150103170 Nelson Apr 2015 A1
20150103197 Djordjevic Apr 2015 A1
20150130799 Holzer et al. May 2015 A1
20150130800 Holzer et al. May 2015 A1
20150130894 Holzer et al. May 2015 A1
20150134651 Holzer et al. May 2015 A1
20150138190 Holzer et al. May 2015 A1
20150143239 Birkbeck May 2015 A1
20150154442 Takahashi Jun 2015 A1
20150188967 Paulauskas Jul 2015 A1
20150198443 Yi et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150201176 Graziosi Jul 2015 A1
20150206341 Loper Jul 2015 A1
20150222880 Choi Aug 2015 A1
20150227285 Lee Aug 2015 A1
20150227816 Du et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150235408 Gross Aug 2015 A1
20150242686 Lenka Aug 2015 A1
20150254224 Kim Sep 2015 A1
20150269772 Ha et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150271356 Terada Sep 2015 A1
20150281323 Gold Oct 2015 A1
20150309695 Sannandeji Oct 2015 A1
20150318020 Pribula Nov 2015 A1
20150319424 Haimovitch-yogev et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150324649 Grewe Nov 2015 A1
20150339846 Holzer et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150371440 Pirchheim et al. Dec 2015 A1
20150379763 Liktor et al. Dec 2015 A1
20160001137 Phillips Jan 2016 A1
20160026253 Bradski Jan 2016 A1
20160027209 Demirli Jan 2016 A1
20160034459 Larsen et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160042251 Cordova-Diba Feb 2016 A1
20160044240 Beers Feb 2016 A1
20160050368 Seo et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160055330 Morishita Feb 2016 A1
20160061582 Lucey Mar 2016 A1
20160063740 Sakimoto Mar 2016 A1
20160077422 Wang Mar 2016 A1
20160078287 Auge Mar 2016 A1
20160080684 Farrell Mar 2016 A1
20160080830 Kim Mar 2016 A1
20160086381 Jung et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160088287 Sadi Mar 2016 A1
20160110913 Kosoy Apr 2016 A1
20160139794 Hammendorp May 2016 A1
20160140125 Goyal et al. May 2016 A1
20160171330 Mentese Jun 2016 A1
20160189334 Mason Jun 2016 A1
20160191895 Yun Jun 2016 A1
20160203586 Chang Jul 2016 A1
20160205341 Hollander Jul 2016 A1
20160210602 Siddique Jul 2016 A1
20160261855 Park Sep 2016 A1
20160267676 Setomoto Sep 2016 A1
20160275283 De Leon Sep 2016 A1
20160295127 Yu Oct 2016 A1
20160350930 Lin et al. Dec 2016 A1
20160350975 Nakagawa Dec 2016 A1
20160353089 Gallup et al. Dec 2016 A1
20160358337 Dai et al. Dec 2016 A1
20160379415 Espeset Dec 2016 A1
20170018054 Holzer et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170018055 Holzer et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170018056 Holzer et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170024094 Gresham Jan 2017 A1
20170026574 Kwon Jan 2017 A1
20170053169 Cuban Feb 2017 A1
20170067739 Siercks Mar 2017 A1
20170084001 Holzer et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170084293 Holzer Mar 2017 A1
20170087415 Nandimandalam Mar 2017 A1
20170103510 Wang Apr 2017 A1
20170103584 Vats Apr 2017 A1
20170109930 Holzer Apr 2017 A1
20170124769 Saito May 2017 A1
20170124770 Vats May 2017 A1
20170126988 Holzer et al. May 2017 A1
20170140236 Price et al. May 2017 A1
20170148179 Holzer et al. May 2017 A1
20170148186 Holzer et al. May 2017 A1
20170148199 Holzer et al. May 2017 A1
20170148222 Holzer et al. May 2017 A1
20170148223 Holzer et al. May 2017 A1
20170158131 Friebe Jun 2017 A1
20170206648 Marra Jul 2017 A1
20170213385 Yu Jul 2017 A1
20170231550 Do et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170236287 Shen Aug 2017 A1
20170249339 Lester Aug 2017 A1
20170255648 Dube Sep 2017 A1
20170256066 Richard Sep 2017 A1
20170277363 Holzer et al. Sep 2017 A1
20170277952 Thommes Sep 2017 A1
20170278544 Choi Sep 2017 A1
20170287137 Lin et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170293894 Taliwal Oct 2017 A1
20170308771 Shimauchi Oct 2017 A1
20170316092 Fichter Nov 2017 A1
20170330319 Xu et al. Nov 2017 A1
20170337693 Baruch Nov 2017 A1
20170344223 Holzer et al. Nov 2017 A1
20170344808 El-Khamy et al. Nov 2017 A1
20170357910 Sommer Dec 2017 A1
20170359570 Holzer et al. Dec 2017 A1
20170364766 Das Dec 2017 A1
20180012330 Holzer et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180012529 Chiba Jan 2018 A1
20180035105 Choi Feb 2018 A1
20180035500 Song Feb 2018 A1
20180045592 Okita Feb 2018 A1
20180046356 Holzer et al. Feb 2018 A1
20180046357 Holzer et al. Feb 2018 A1
20180046649 Dal Mutto Feb 2018 A1
20180052665 Kaur Feb 2018 A1
20180063504 Haines Mar 2018 A1
20180082715 Rymkowski Mar 2018 A1
20180143023 Bjorke May 2018 A1
20180143756 Mildrew May 2018 A1
20180144547 Shakib May 2018 A1
20180155057 Irish Jun 2018 A1
20180158197 Dasgupta Jun 2018 A1
20180165875 Yu Jun 2018 A1
20180199025 Holzer Jul 2018 A1
20180203877 Holzer Jul 2018 A1
20180205941 Kopf Jul 2018 A1
20180211131 Holzer et al. Jul 2018 A1
20180211404 Zhu Jul 2018 A1
20180218235 Holzer et al. Aug 2018 A1
20180218236 Holzer et al. Aug 2018 A1
20180234671 Yang Aug 2018 A1
20180240243 Kim Aug 2018 A1
20180255290 Holzer et al. Sep 2018 A1
20180268220 Lee Sep 2018 A1
20180286098 Lorenzo Oct 2018 A1
20180293774 Yu Oct 2018 A1
20180315200 Davydov Nov 2018 A1
20180336724 Spring Nov 2018 A1
20180336737 Varady Nov 2018 A1
20180338126 Bruen Nov 2018 A1
20180338128 Bruen Nov 2018 A1
20180357518 Taiki Dec 2018 A1
20180374273 Holzer Dec 2018 A1
20190019056 Pierce et al. Jan 2019 A1
20190025544 Watanabe Jan 2019 A1
20190026956 Gausebeck Jan 2019 A1
20190035149 Chen Jan 2019 A1
20190050664 Yang Feb 2019 A1
20190080499 Holzer Mar 2019 A1
20190094981 Bradski Mar 2019 A1
20190147221 Grabner May 2019 A1
20190209886 Harlow Jul 2019 A1
20190213392 Pan Jul 2019 A1
20190213406 Porikli Jul 2019 A1
20190220991 Holzer Jul 2019 A1
20190221021 Holzer Jul 2019 A1
20190222776 Carter Jul 2019 A1
20190235729 Day Aug 2019 A1
20190244372 Holzer Aug 2019 A1
20190251738 Holzer Aug 2019 A1
20190278434 Holzer Sep 2019 A1
20190304064 Zhang Oct 2019 A1
20190364265 Matsunobu Nov 2019 A1
20200027263 Holzer Jan 2020 A1
20200045249 Francois Feb 2020 A1
20200125877 Phan Apr 2020 A1
20200128060 Han Apr 2020 A1
20200137380 Supikov Apr 2020 A1
20200167570 Beall May 2020 A1
20200234397 Holzer Jul 2020 A1
20200234451 Holzer Jul 2020 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (14)
Number Date Country
105849781 Aug 2016 CN
105849781 Aug 2016 CN
112014005165 Jul 2016 DE
112017004150 Jun 2019 DE
2534821 Aug 2016 GB
20120110861 Oct 2012 KR
10159025661 Feb 2016 KR
2015073570 May 2015 WO
2017053197 Mar 2017 WO
2018035500 Feb 2018 WO
2018052665 Mar 2018 WO
2018154331 Aug 2018 WO
2019209886 Oct 2019 WO
2020092177 May 2020 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (249)
Entry
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/800,638, Non Final Office Action dated Jul. 29, 2016”, 11 pages.
“U.S. Appl. No. 1/800,642, Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 6, 2018”, 12 pages.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/101,883, Examiner Interview Summary dated Oct. 18, 2017”, 2 pages.
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/101,883, Examiner Interview Summary dated Nov. 15, 2018”, 3 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/530,669, Advisory Action dated Aug. 8, 2017”, 5 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/530,669, Examiner Interview Summary dated Apr. 14, 2017”, 3 pages.
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/530,669, Examiner Interview Summary dated Aug. 8, 2017”, 2 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/530,669, Final Office Action dated Apr. 20, 2017”, 25 pages.
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/530,669, Non Final Office Action dated Jan. 3, 2017”, 26 pages.
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/530,671, Non Final Office Action dated Jan. 3, 2017”, 32 pages.
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/539,814, Non Final Office Action dated Dec. 30, 2016”, 37 pages.
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/539,889, Non Final Office Action dated Oct. 6, 2016”, 14 pages.
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/800,638, Examiner Interview Summary dated May 9, 2017”, 2 pages.
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/800,638, Examiner Interview Summary dated Nov. 7, 2016”, 3 pages.
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/800,638, Examiner Interview Summary dated Dec. 13, 2017”, 1 page.
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/800,638, Final Office Action dated Jan. 20, 2017”, 12 pages.
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/800,638, Non Final Office Action dated Jun. 15, 2017”, 12 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/800,638, Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 13, 2017”, 9 pages.
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/800,640, Advisory Action dated Jan. 5, 2018”, 3 pages.
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/800,640, Advisory Action dated Feb. 8, 2018”, 2 pages.
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/800,640, Examiner Interview Summary dated Feb. 8, 2018”, 1 page.
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/800,640, Examiner Interview Summary dated Oct. 23, 2018”, 3 pages.
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/800,640, Final Office Action dated Oct. 16, 2017”, 15 pages.
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/800,640, Non Final Office Action dated Jun. 8, 2017”, 14 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/800,640, Non inal Office Action dated Jul. 17, 2018”, 16 pages.
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/800,640, Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 21, 2018”, 7 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/800,640, Restriction Requirement dated Mar. 3, 2017”, 5 pages.
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/800,642, Advisory Action dated Jan. 5, 2018”, 3 pages.
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/800,642, Advisory Action dated Feb. 8, 2018”, 3 pages.
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/800,642, Examiner Interview Summary dated Feb. 8, 2018”, 1 page.
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/800,642, Examiner Interview Summary dated Aug. 6, 2018”, 1 page.
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/800,642, Final Office Action dated Oct. 17, 2017”, 18 pages.
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/800,642, Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 6, 2018”, 12 pages.
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/819,473, Examiner Interview Summary dated Jul. 11, 2016”, 3 pages.
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/819,473, Examiner Interview Summary dated Aug. 17, 2016”, 3 pages.
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/819,473, Examiner Interview Summary dated Oct. 14, 2016”, 3 pages.
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/819,473, Final Office Action dated Apr. 28, 2016”, 45 pages.
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/819,473, Non Final Office Action dated Sep. 1, 2016”, 36 pages.
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/819,473, Non Final Office Action dated Oct. 8, 2015”, 44 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/860,983, Advisory Action dated Jan. 23, 2018”, 3 pages.
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/860,983, Final Office Action dated Jan. 18, 2019”, 19 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/860,983, Final Office Action dated Oct. 18, 2017”, 21 pages.
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/860,983, Non Final Office Action dated Jun. 8, 2017”, 26 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/860,983, Non Final Office Action dated Aug. 7, 2018”, 22 pages.
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/408,211, Examiner Interview Summary dated Dec. 5, 2018”, 3 pages.
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/408,211, Final Office Action dated Jan. 11, 2019”, 23 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/408,211, Non Final Office Action dated Aug. 6, 2018”, 22 pages.
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/425,983, Advisory Action dated Oct. 12, 2018”, 5 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/425,983, Examiner Interview Summary dated May 3, 2018”, 3 pages.
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/425,983, Examiner Interview Summary dated Jun. 5, 2018”, 3 pages.
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/425,983, Examiner Interview Summary dated Sep. 28, 2018”, 3 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/425,983, Examiner Interview Summary dated Oct. 12, 2018”, 2 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/425,983, Examiner Interview Summary dated Dec. 12, 2018”, 2 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/425,983, Final Office Action dated Jun. 26, 2018”, 29 pages.
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/425,983, Non Final Office Action dated Jan. 11, 2018”, 29 pages.
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/425,983, Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 12, 2018”, 14 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/425,988, Examiner Interview Summary dated Nov. 20, 2018”, 3 pages.
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/425,988, Non Final Office Action dated Aug. 10, 2018”, 18 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/425,988, Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 28, 2018”, 8 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/426,994, Advisory Action dated Dec. 13, 2018”, 3 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/426,994, Examiner Interview Summary dated Jan. 15, 2019”, 3 pages.
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/426,994, Final Office Action dated Oct. 10, 2018”, 21 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/426,994, Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 19, 2018”, 22 pages.
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/427,009, Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 6, 2018”, 9 pages.
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/428,104, Advisory Action dated Dec. 13, 2018”, 3 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/428,104, Examiner Interview Summary dated Jan. 15, 2019”, 3 pages.
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/428,104, Examiner Interview Summary dated Dec. 7, 2018”, 3 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/428,104, Final Office Action dated Oct. 10, 2018”, 23 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/428,104, Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 2019, 2018”, 21 pages.
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/620,506, Non Final Office Action dated Jan. 23, 2019”, 13 pages.
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/673,125, Non Final Office Action dated Feb. 6, 2019”, 17 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/682,362, Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 22, 2018”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/713,406, Non Final Office Action dated Jan. 30, 2019”, 21 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/724,081, Non Final Office Action dated Dec. 11, 2018”, 12 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/724,087, Non Final Office Action dated Jan. 31, 2019”, 5 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/724,087, Non Final Office Action dated Jan. 31, 2019”, 15 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/800,638, Advisory Action dated May 9, 2017”, 5 pgs.
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2016/042355, Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 19, 2016”, 9 pages.
“Int'l Application Serial No. PCT/US17/47684, Int'l Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Feb. 28, 2019”, 7 pgs.
“Int'l Application Serial No. PCT/US17/47684, Int'l Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 27, 2017”, 8 pgs.
“Int'l Application Serial No. PCT/US17/47859, Int'l Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Feb. 28, 2019”, 7 pgs.
“Int'l Application Serial No. PCT/US17/47859, Int'l Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 2, 2017”, 8 pages.
“Int'l Application Serial No. PCT/US2014/065282, Search Reports Written Opinion dated Feb. 23, 2015”, 9 pgs.
“United Kingdom Application Serial No. 1609577.0, Office Action dated Jun. 15, 166”, 1 pg.
Ballan, Luca et al., “Unstructured Video-Based Rendering: Interactive Exploration of Casually Captured Videos”, ACM, ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG)—Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 2010, vol. 29, Issue 4, Article No. 87, Jul. 30, 2010.
Buehler, Chris et al., “Unstructured Lumigraph Rendering”, ACM, ACM SIGGRAPH, 2001, pp. 425-432.
Cao, Xun et al., “Semi-Automatic 2D-to-3D Conversion Using Disparity Propagation”, IEEE, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, vol. 57, Issue 2, Apr. 19, 2011, pp. 491-499.
Chan, Shing-Chow et al., “An Object-Based Approach to Image/Video-Based Synthesis and Processing for 3-D and Multiview Televisions”, IEEE, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 19, Issue 6, Mar. 16, 2009, pp. 821-831.
Chen, Shenchang E. , “QuickTime VR—An Image-Based Approach to Virtual Environment Navigation”, ACM, SIGGRAPH '95 Proceedings of the 22nd annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, 1995, 29-38.
Clare, Adam , “Reality is a Game; What is Skybox?”, retrieved from the Internet <http://www.realityisagame.com/archives/1776/what-is-a-skybox/>, 5.
Davis, Abe et al., “Unstructured Light Fields”, Blackwell Publishing, Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 31, Issue 2, Pt. 1, May 2012, pp. 305-314.
Figueroa, Nadia et al., “From Sense to Print: Towards Automatic 3D Printing from 3D Sensing Devices”, IEEE, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC, Oct. 13, 2013.
Fitzgibbon, Andrew , “Automatic 3D Model Acquisition and Generation of New Images from Video Sequences”, IEEE, 9th European Signal Processing Conference, Sep. 1998, 8 pgs.
Fusiello, Andrea et al., “View Synthesis from Uncalibrated Images Using Parallax”, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Image Analysis and Processing, 2003, pp. 146-151.
Golovinskly, Aleksey et al., “Shape-based Recognition of 3D Point Clouds in Urban Environment”, IEEE, IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2009, 2154-2161.
Gurdan, Tobias et al., “Spatial and Temporal Interpolation of Multi-View Image Sequences”, Department of Computer Science, Technische Universit{umlaut over ( )}at M{umlaut over ( )}unchen Ascending Technologies GmbH, Krailing, Germany, Section 2.3, Image Warping and Blending; Retrieved from the Internet <https://vision.in.tum.de/_media/spezial/bib/gurdan-et-al-gcpr-2014.pdf>, 12.
Keller, Maik et al., “Real-Time 3D Reconstruction in Dynamic Scenes Using Point-Based Fusion”, IEEE, 2013 International Conference on 3DTV, Jul. 1, 2013.
Kottamasu, V. L. P. , “User Interaction of One-Dimensional Panoramic Images for iPod Touch”, Thesis, Linkoping University Electronic Press, LIU-IDA-LITH-EX-A--12/071-SE, Dec. 4, 2012.
Mian, Ajmal S. et al., “Three-Dimensional Model-Based Object Recognition and Segmentation in Clutterd Scenes”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, col. 28, No. 10, Oct. 2006, 1584-1601.
Pollard, Stephen et al., “Automatically Synthesising Virtual Viewpoints by Trinocular Image Interpolation—Detailed Report”, HP, Technical Report, HP Laboratories Bristol HPL-97-166, Dec. 1997, 40 pgs.
Prisacariu, Victor A. et al., “Simultaneous 3D Tracking and Reconstruction on a Mobile Phone”, IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, 2013, pp. 89-98.
Saito, Hideo et al., “View Interpolation of Multiple Cameras Based on Projective Geometry”, Department of Information and Computer Science, Keio University and Presto, Japan Science and Technology Corporation (JST), retrieved from the Internet <http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.6.5162&rep=rep1&type=pdf>, 6.
Schiller, Ingo et al., “Datastructure for Capturing Dynamic Scenes with a Time-of-Flight Camera”, Springer-Verlad, Dyna3D 2009, LNCS 5742, 2009, 42-57.
Seitz, Steven M. , “Image-Based Transformation of Viewpoint and Scene Appearance”, A Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Wisconsin; retrieved from the Internet <http://homes.cs.washington.edu/˜seitz/papers/thesis.pdf>, 1997, 111.
Shade, Jonathan et al., “Layered Depth Images”, Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, ACM, SIGGRAPH, Jul. 24, 1998, pp. 231-242.
Shin, Hong-Chang et al., “Fast View Synthesis using GPU for 3D Display”, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, vol. 54, No. 4, Dec. 2008, pp. 2068-2076.
Snavely, Noah et al., “Photo Tourism: Exploring Phot Collections in 3D”, ACM, ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG)—Proceeding of ACM SIGGRAPH 2006, vol. 25, Issue 3, Jul. 2006, 835-846.
Steder, Bastian et al., “Robust On-line Model-based Object Detection from Range Images”, International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 4739-4744, Oct. 15, 2009, 6 pages.
Thyssen, Anthony , “ImageMagick v6 Examples—Color Basics and Channels”, Website http://www.imagemagick.org/Usage/color_basics/, Retrieved Dec. 23, 2016, Mar. 9, 2011.
Torr, P.H.S. et al., “Robust Parameterization and Computation of the Trifocal Tensor”, Elsevier, Image and Vision Computing, vol. 15, Issue 8, Aug. 1997, pp. 591-605.
Xiao, Jiangjian et al., “Tri-view Morphing”, Elsevier, Computer Vision and Image Understanding, vol. 96, Issue 3, Dec. 2004, pp. 345-366.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/620,506, Final Office Action dated Jun. 10, 2019, 17 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/632,709, Examiner Interview Summary Action dated Apr. 30, 2018, 1 pg.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/632,709, Final Office Action dated Jul. 17, 2018, 12 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/632,709, Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 3, 2019, 13 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/632,709, Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 30, 2018, 14 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/632,709, Notice of Allowance Action dated May 3, 2021, 9 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/673,125, Examiner Interview Summary Action dated Aug. 1, 2019, 3 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/673,125, Final Office Action Action dated Jun. 3, 2019, 17 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/713,406, Examiner Interview Summary Action dated Aug. 2, 2019, 3 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/713,406, Final Office Action dated Jun. 3, 2019, 21 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/717,889, Advisory Action dated Jul. 6, 2021, 3 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/717,889, Examiner Interview Summary dated Jun. 4, 2021, 2 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/717,889, Examiner Interview Summary dated Jul. 6, 2021, 2 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/717,889, Final Office Action dated Mar. 4, 2021, 37 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/724,081, Examiner Interview Summary dated Mar. 4, 2019, 3 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/724,081, Examiner Interview Summary dated Jul. 30, 2019, 3 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/724,081, Examiner Interview Summary dated Aug. 20, 2019, 2 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/724,081, Final Office Action dated May 14, 2019, 14 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/724,081, Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 20, 2019, 12 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/724,087, Final Office Action dated Jul. 1, 2019, 16 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/911,993, Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 12, 2021, 8 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/963,896, Non Final Office Action dated Apr. 18, 2019, 7 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/963,896, Notice of Allowance dated May 22, 2019, 8 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/969,749, Examiner Interview Summary dated Apr. 20, 2021, 1 pg.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/179,746, Examiner Interview Summary dated Jun. 3, 2021, 1 pg.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/179,746, Final Office Action dated Jun. 3, 2021, 25 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/179,746, Non-Final Office Action dated Feb. 11, 2021, 25 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/362,547, Examiner Interview Summary dated Jul. 12, 2021, 2 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/362,547, Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 23, 2021, 14 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/384,578, Corrected Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 26, 2019, 2 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/384,578, Non Final Office Action dated May 9, 2019, 9 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/726,090, Advisory Action dated Jun. 21, 2021, 3 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/726,090, Examiner Interview Summary dated Feb. 25, 2021, 3 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/726,090, Examiner Interview Summary dated Jun. 21, 2021, 1 pg.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/778,981, Corrected Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 31, 21, 11 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/778,981, Examiner Interview Summary dated Mar. 31, 2021, 1 pg.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/778,981, Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 9, 2021, 9 pgs.
Belongie, Serge, Jitendra Malik, and Jan Puzicha. “Shape matching and object recognition using shape contexts.” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis & Machine Intelligence 4 (2002): 509-522. (Year: 2002).
Bulat et al.; “Human pose estimation via convolutional part heatmap regression,” In ECCV, 2016 (Year: 2016).
Extract all frames from video files, Video Help Forum, Oct. 2010, 3 pages.
Fischler, Martin A.., et al., Random Sample Consensus: A Paradigm for Model Fitting with Applications to Image Analysis and Automated Cartography, ACM, Communications of the ACM, vol. 24, No. 6, Jun. 1981, 381-395 pgs.
Fusiello, Andrea, Specifying Virtual Cameras In Uncalibrated View Synthesis, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 17, No. 5, May 2007, 8 pages.
Gatys et al., “A Neural Algorithm of Artistic Style”, Cornell University, arXiv:1508.06576v2 pp. 1-16. (Year: 2015).
Gibson, Simon, et al., Accurate Camera Calibration for Off-line, Video-Based Augmented Reality, IEEE, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR'02) 10 pages.
Haines, Russell, U.S. Appl. No. 62/380,914, Specification and Drawings, p. 1-24 (Year: 2016).
International Application Serial No. PCT/US19/28807 Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Nov. 5, 2020, 9 pgs.
International Application Serial No. PCT/US19/28807 Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 8, 2019, 12 pgs.
International Application Serial No. PCT/US19/58204, Preliminary Report on Patentability dated May 14, 2021, 7 pgs.
International Application Serial No. PCT/US2019/058204, Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 21, 2020, 10 pages.
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/409,500, Examiner Interview Summary dated Mar. 5, 2019”, 3 pages.
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/409,500, Non Final Office Action dated Dec. 11, 2018”, 11 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/409,500, Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 3, 2019”, 8 pages.
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/601,863, Examiner Interview Summary dated Nov. 21, 2018”, 4 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/601,863, Non Final Office Action dated Sep. 20, 2018”, 23 pages.
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/601,863, Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 24, 2019”, 8 pages.
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US16/52192, Intl Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 12, 2016”, 8 pages, [7 pages].
U.S. Appl. No. 14/860,983, Final Rejection, dated Feb. 12, 2020, 18 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/620,506, Notice Of Allowance And Fees Due (Ptol-85), dated Mar. 2, 2020, 10 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/632,709, Non-Final Rejection,dated May 22, 2020, 10 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/673,125, Final Rejection, dated Feb. 19, 2020, 17 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/713,406, Final Rejection, dated Feb. 19, 2020, 22 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/717,889, Non-Final Rejection, dated Oct. 27, 2020, 40 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/911,993, Non-Final Rejection, dated Aug. 5, 2020, 6 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/969,749, Final Rejection, dated Feb. 26, 2020, 15 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/969,749, Non-Final Rejection, dated Sep. 17, 2020, 15 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/179,746, Advisory Action (Ptol-303), dated Sep. 15, 2020, 2 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/179,746, Examiner Interview Summary Record (Ptol-413), Nov. 5, 2020, 2 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/362,547, Advisory Action (Ptol-303), dated Nov. 18, 2020, 2 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/362,547, Examiner Interview Summary Record (Ptol-413), dated Nov. 18, 2020, 1 pg.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/362,547, Final Rejection, dated Sep. 24, 2020,14 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/362,547,Examiner Interview Summary Record (Ptol-413), dated Nov. 5, 2020, 2 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/426,323, Notice Of Allowance And Fees Due (Ptol-85), dated Aug. 5, 2020, 11 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/451,371, NOA—Notice Of Allowance And Fees Due (Ptol-85), dated Sep. 17, 2020, 5 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/451,371, Non-Final Rejection, dated Jun. 11, 2020, 9 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/586,868, Notice Of Allowance And Fees Due (Ptol-85), dated Oct. 7, 2020, 2 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/586,868, Notice Of Allowance And Fees Due (Ptol-85),dated Jul. 31, 2020, 13 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/586,868, USPTO e-Office Action: CTNF—Non-Final Rejection, dated Dec. 20, 2019, 19 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/726,090, Non-Final Rejection, dated Nov. 19, 2020, 12 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/778,981, Non-Final Rejection, dated Oct. 13, 2020, 7 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/101,883, Examiner Interview Summary dated Sep. 6, 2016, 3 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/464,588, Non Final Office Action dated Aug. 2, 2019, 14 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/800,642, Non-Final Office Action dated May 18, 2017, 17 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/860,983, Advisory Action dated Mar. 26, 2019, 2 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/860,983, Examiner Interview Summary dated Mar. 26, 2019, 2 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/860,983, Examiner Interview Summary dated Apr. 8, 2019, 3 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/860,983, Examiner Interview Summary dated Nov. 15, 2018, 3 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/408,211, Advisory Action dated Mar. 18, 2019, 4 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/408,211, Examiner Interview Summary dated Mar. 4, 2019, 3 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/408,211, Examiner Interview Summary dated Mar. 18, 2019, 2 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/408,211, Examiner Interview Summary dated Apr. 3, 2019, 3 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/408,211, Examiner Interview Summary dated Aug. 5, 2019, 3 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/408,211, Examiner Interview Summary dated Oct. 16, 2019, 2 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/408,211, Non Final Office Action dated May 2, 2019, 20 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/425,983, Examiner Interview Summary dated May 17, 2018, 3 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/426,994, Non Final Office Action dated Aug. 6, 2019, 22 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/428,104, Non Final Office Action dated Aug. 6, 2019, 24 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/620,506, Advisory Action dated Aug. 26, 2019, 2 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/620,506, Examiner Inteview Summary dated Aug. 26, 2019, 1 pg.
Intl Application Serial No. PCT/US19/030395, Intl Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 2, 2019, 9 pgs.
Klappstein, Jens, et al., Moving Object Segmentation Using Optical Flow and Depth Information, Springer, In: Wada T., Huang F., Lin S. (eds) Advances in Image and Video Technology. PSIVT 2009. LectureNotes in Computer Science, vol. 5414, 611-623 pgs.
Li, Mingyang, Byung Hyung Kim, and Anastasius 1. Mourikis. “Real-time motion tracking on a cellphone using inertial sensing and a rolling-shutter camera.” 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. IEEE, 2013. (Year: 2013) 8 pages.
Matsunobu, Tom et al., U.S. Appl. No. 62/457,276, Specification, p. 1-19 (Year: 2017).
Mikolajczyk, Krystian, et al., A Performance Evaluation of Local Descriptors, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 27, No. 10, Oct. 2005, 1615-1630.
Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 20, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/969,749 (pp. 1-5).
Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 17, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/604,938 (pp. 1-12).
Notice of Allowance dated May 3, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/632,709 (pp. 1-9).
Nützi, Gabriel, et al. “Fusion of IMU and vision for absolute scale estimation in monocular SLAM.” Journal of intelligent & robotic Systems 61.1-4 (2011): 287-299. (Year: 2011).
Office Action (Final Rejection) dated Jan. 19, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/726,090 (pp. 1-16).
Office Action (Final Rejection) dated Apr. 25, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/813,506 (pp. 1-17).
Office Action (Non-Final Rejection) dated Mar. 21, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/861,019 (pp. 1-32).
Office Action (Non-Final Rejection) dated Apr. 14, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/338,217 (pp. 1-10).
Office Action (Non-Final Rejection) dated Sep. 22, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/726,090 (pp. 1-15).
Office Action (Non-Final Rejection) dated Oct. 14, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/427,030 (pp. 1-17).
Office Action (Non-Final Rejection) dated Oct. 28, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/813,506 (pp. 1-19).
Office Action (Non-Final Rejection) dated Nov. 10, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/389,544 (pp. 1-28).
Office Action (Notice of Allowance and Fees Due (PTOL-85)) dated May 18, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/389,544 (pp. 1-8).
Office Action (Notice of Allowance and Fees Due (PTOL-85)) dated Jun. 2, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/726,090 (pp. 1-7).
Office Action (Notice of Allowance and Fees Due (PTOL-85)) dated Sep. 16, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/179,746 (pp. 1-5).
Office Action (Notice of Allowance and Fees Due (PTOL-85)) dated Sep. 29, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/717,889 (pp. 1-12).
Office Action (Notice of Allowance and Fees Due (PTOL-85)) dated Sep. 30, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/179,746 (pp. 1-2).
Office Action (Notice of Allowance and Fees Due (PTOL-85)) dated Oct. 15, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/179,746 (pp. 1-2).
Office Action dated Apr. 1, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/427,030 (pp. 1-18).
Office Action dated Apr. 1, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/389,544 (pp. 1-29).
Office Action dated Apr. 9, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/554,996 (pp. 1-29).
Office Action dated Jun. 3, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/179,746 (pp. 1-26).
Office Action dated Mar. 12, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/726,090 (pp. 1-14).
Qi Pan et al., “Rapid Scene Reconstruction on Mobile Phones from Panoramic Images”, Oct. 2011, pp. 55-64 (Year: 2011).
Russell, Bryan C, etal. “LabelMe: a database and web-based tool forimage annotation.” International Journal of Computer vision 77.1-3 (2008): 157-173. (Year: 2008).
Supplemental Notice of Allowability dated May 5, 2021 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/969,749 (pp. 1-2).
Utasi, Äkos, and Csaba Benedek. “A multi-view annotation tool for people detection evaluation.” Proceedings of the Ist International Workshop on Visual interfaces forground truth collection in Computer vision applications ACM, 2012 (Year: 2012) 7 pages.
Weigel, Christian, et al., Advanced 3D Video Object Synthesis Based on Trilinear Tensors, IEEE Tenth International Symposium on Consumer Electronics, 2006, 5 pages.
Z. Cao et al., ‘Realtime Multi-Person 2D Pose Estimation using Part Affinity Fields’, In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Apr. 14, 2017, pp. 1-9 sections 2-3; and figure 2.
Zhang, Guofeng, et al., Video stabilization based on a 3D perspective camera model, Springer, The Visual Computer (2009) 25, 997 pg.
Zhang, Zhengyou, et al., A robust technique for matching two uncalibrated images through the recovery of the unknown epipolar geometry, Elsevier, Artificial Intelligence 78, 1995, 87-119 pgs.
Zheng, et al., Conditional Random Fields as Recurrent Neural Networks, IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 2016, 1529-1537 pgs.
Office Action (Final Rejection) dated Jul. 6, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/861,019 (pp. 1-36).
Office Action (Final Rejection) dated Jul. 22, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/427,030 (pp. 1-18).
Office Action (Notice of Allowance and Fees Due (PTOL-85)) dated Jun. 29, 2022 for U.S. Appl. No. 17/338,217 (pp. 1-9).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20190221021 A1 Jul 2019 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 14800640 Jul 2015 US
Child 16362547 US