The present invention relates to sterilizing food products, and in particular to a method and system for aseptically sterilizing pumpable foods containing particles.
The traditional manner of processing particulate-containing food products consists of placing the food product in individual cans, sealing the cans and then heating the cans, perhaps while rotating the cans to mix the food product in the can. This process has been generally effective in killing bacteria in the canned food product; however, this process may be labor intensive and require extensive machinery in order to reach high production rates. Also, the empty cans require considerable storage space prior to being filled. In addition, the in-can sterilization process often results in the degradation of the food product, including from an appearance and taste standpoint.
Thermal (aseptic) processes were developed to process food products as a continuous stream or flow whereby the food product and the food package are separately sterilized. After sterilization, the food product is aseptically filled into the package in an environment that preserves sterility until the package is sealed. Aseptic processing of food products not only enables lightweight and inexpensive packaging to be used, but also makes it possible to employ packaging that is stored in a collapsed position until used and also packaging of unlimited sizes.
To date, aseptic processing of food has been primarily limited to high acid, clear or homogeneous food products, such as juices, puddings and diced tomatoes. Typically in such foods, the required cooking temperatures and holding times are relatively low and the likelihood of health hazards from improper processing is also insignificant. Aseptic processing of such homogeneous and high-acid food products generally involves the use of an initial positive displacement pump to deliver a continuous stream of food product into a processing station. The processing station typically includes one or more heat exchangers for heating the food product, an intermediate holding tube arrangement, followed by one or more cooling heat exchangers. A back pressure valve is typically located downstream to create a flow restriction and to generate system pressure. The processed food product may then be routed directly to an aseptic filling station or perhaps to a storage aseptic tank to accumulate the processed food product prior to being dispensed into aseptic containers.
Aseptic processing heretofore has not been widely used for low acid foods having particulates, although the use of aseptic processing would be a great advantage in processing of low-acid particulate foods, such as soups and stews. Aseptic processing systems for low acid foods, especially such foods containing particulates, are currently expensive and typically have limited product throughput. Moreover, to meet the required governmental regulations for processing low acid foods containing particulates, the required technology is complex in terms of not only the basic processing, but also the packaging for the product, as compared to conventional food processing methods. Nonetheless, an efficient aseptic process for low acid foods containing particulate can result in reduced processing costs and higher processing rates, as well as increased product quality due to a fresher-appearing and better-tasting product.
Challenges do exist in using aseptic processing for low acid products containing particulates. In this regard, government regulations covering aseptic processing require maintaining a close tolerance between lethality standards and actual conditions. If a manufacturer seeks to process the low acid food on a conservative basis by overheating to exceed lethality requirements, the taste, texture and quality of the food product likely would be adversely affected from the overcooking. While heat transfer can be measured fairly precisely from the heating tubes and holding tubes to a uniform liquid, the measurement and heat transfer modeling is much more complex in liquid foods containing particulates. In liquid foods containing particulates, such as gravies, soups, and stews, heat transfer depends on the interaction between the particulates in the liquid, residence times for the liquids and the particulates and other factors which complicate analysis. In the liquid-particulate mixtures, the slowest heating locations will be at the center of the largest particulates or at the center of the fastest moving particulates, which often refer to the “worst case” particle. The residence time of each food particle in the flow can be difficult to determine. Residence time is an important variable because it is used to calculate the lethality achieved in the aseptic process. As is known in the art, lethality can be calculated as a function of time using equations that require temperature and residence time measurements among other measurements. Alternatively stated, lethality is the amount of time a particle is subjected to a temperature sufficient to kill the food spoilage microorganisms and pathogens to an adequate safety level for protecting public health and for food preservation. One such example of spoilage microorganism for low-acid food is Clostridium botulinum spores, which produce deadly toxin if it is allowed to grow.
It is important to develop a model of the aseptic process that accurately corresponds to the lethality achieved in the food product being processed. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration will require such a model in order to accept the aseptic process of low-acid foods containing particles for commercial use.
The present invention provides aseptic processes for food products containing particulates, whether of low acid or high acid.
The present invention provides a method for administering an aseptic sterilization process to a pumpable, food product having particulates. The method includes controlling the aseptic sterilization process to perform aseptic sterilization of the food product according to parameters determined by the validated model, which in turn is based at least in part on the physical characteristics of the food products being sterilized. At least one of the scheduled parameters is monitored during the sterilization process. If a deviation occurs in the monitored parameter, the portion of the food product being sterilized that is associated with such deviation is identified and then diverted from the remainder of the food product being sterilized.
In accordance with a further aspect of the present invention, the food product is of low acidity, and the aseptic sterilization process includes heating a continuous flow of the food product to a desired temperature, routing the continuous flow food product through a holding apparatus to achieve a desired sanitation level, and then cooling the continuous flow food product after the desired level of sterilization has been achieved.
In accordance with a further aspect of the present invention, the parameter that is monitored is the temperature of the food product. In this regard, the temperature of the food product is monitored at a plurality of different locations along the processing of the food product, including during the heating of the food product and during the routing of the food product through the holding apparatus. The temperature of the food product may be monitored, for example, before the heating of the food product, after the heating of the food product, before the routing of the food product to the holding apparatus, after the food product has been routed through the holding apparatus, before the cooling of the food product, during the cooling of the food product, and/or after the cooling of the food product.
In accordance with a further aspect of the present invention, the liquid phase of the food product is heated separately from the particulates in a continuous flow system and then routed to the holding apparatus to provide sufficient time for a desired level of lethality to be achieved in the liquid phase. Simultaneously, the particulates with uniform residence time, separated from the liquid phase, are heating to a desired level to also achieve a desired lethality level. Thereafter, the liquid phase and particulates are combined together and cooled under aseptic conditions for aseptic filling.
In accordance with a further aspect of the present invention, the aseptically sterilized food product is routed through a routing network to either an aseptic surge or to an aseptic filler to fill the sterilized containers with the sterilized food product. Also, the sterilized food product may be alternatively routed away from the aseptic surge tank and/or aseptic filler under predetermined conditions.
The present invention also provides a system for carrying out the aseptic process for the present invention. The system includes a heating subsystem for heating the food product as the food product continuously flows through the heating subsystem. Next, a holding subsystem holds the flowing food product for a pre-selected time duration to achieve a desired lethality in the food product. Next, a cooling subsystem cools the flowing food product after the desired level of lethality has been achieved. A control system controls the flow of the food product through the heating, holding and cooling subsystems according to scheduled process parameters predetermined by the validated model, which model is based at least in part on the physical parameters of the food product. Also, a monitoring subsystem monitors the heating, holding and cooling of the food product to verify that the heating, holding and cooling of the food product is carried out in accordance with the scheduled parameters. The monitoring subsystem also indicates if one of the scheduled parameters is not met. If this is the case, the control system identifies the portion of the food product associated with such deviation and diverts such identified portion of the food product from the remainder of the food product.
The foregoing aspects and many of the attendant advantages of this invention will become more readily appreciated as the same become better understood by reference to the following detailed description, when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
The aseptic processing system and method of the present invention includes determining the lethality delivered by the system, which in turn requires a mathematical model of the system taking into consideration the heat transfer to the food product through operation of the aseptic system of the present invention. The mathematical model is used to set process parameters for the aseptic system of the present invention, including product physical properties such as “worst case” particle size and its geometry, particle thermal conductivity, specific heat and density, particle/liquid heat transfer coefficient, particle fraction, fastest moving particle residence time etc and process parameters such as initial product temperature, process temperatures, flow rates of the food product as well as flow rates of the heating and cooling media. Other process parameters for the aseptic system of the present invention include the temperatures of the heating and cooling media. The aseptic system of the present invention is operated with the determined process parameters, which are monitored during the use of the process. Additional parameters are also monitored, including the temperature of the food product during processing. If a significant deviation of the monitored parameters occurs during processing, the affected food product is identified and diverted away from the remainder of the food product that remains within the process parameters.
Referring initially to
Describing the present invention in more detail, formulated food product 15 is routed to a feed tank 12 through an inlet line 28 for storage prior to sterilization. Such food product may be of various homogeneous or heterogeneous compositions capable of flowing through the system 10. Examples of the homogeneous food products may include puddings, yogurt or soups. Heterogeneous food products include particulates and a liquid, for example, diced tomatoes, gravies and soups. The food product may be of low pH value, such as diced tomatoes, or of high pH value, for example gravies or soups. The storage tank 12 may include a mixing apparatus, for example, as schematically illustrated, agitating blades 30 mounted on a rotary shaft 32, powered by an electric motor 34. The motor may be operated as needed to maintain good mixing of the food product being stored within the tank, especially when food product 15 is being discharged from the tank through outlet 36 to the aseptic sterilizer 16.
A pump 14 transfers the food product 15 from tank 12 to the aseptic sterilizer 16. The pump 14 can be of various configurations to provide a substantially constant volume of the food product to the aseptic sterilizer. Suitable pumps can be positive displacement rotary or piston pumps. The food product 15 flows from pump 14 through line 38 to the heating section 40 of the sterilizer 16. A flow meter 42 is located in line 38 between the pump 14 and the heating section 40 to measure the volumetric or mass flow of the food product 15 entering the aseptic sterilizer 16.
As illustrated, the aseptic sterilizer 16 consists of three basic sections, a heating section 40 to heat the food product to a desired temperature, a holding section or loop 44 through which the food product flows, during which time the temperature of the particulates are increased from the heat energy of the liquid, and then a cooling section 46 to cool the food product to an acceptable level for packaging, for instance at the aseptic filler 20. The sections of the aseptic sterilizer 16 are illustrated in more detail in
Referring initially to
The heating section 40 of the present invention is also characterized by the use of numerous temperature sensors, including sensors 60 and 62 to sense the inlet and outlet temperatures, respectively, of the heating medium used in heat exchanger 48. Temperature sensors 64 and 66 also sense the temperature of the food product at the entrance and exit of the heat exchanger 48. Moreover, a plurality of additional temperature sensors 68A, 68B, 68C, etc., are positioned along the heat exchanger 48 to sense the temperature of the food product 15 and heating medium as it is being heated by the heat exchanger. In this regard, sensor 68C is located at or near the center of the heat exchanger. In this manner, the entire temperature profile of the food product as it flows through the heat exchanger 48 may be monitored. Also, a flow meter 69 is positioned adjacent the heating medium entrance 52 to measure the volumetric flow rate of the heating medium through the heat exchanger 48.
The food product 15 flows from the heating section 40 to the holding section or loop 44 through line 70. Referring to
From holding section 44, the heated food product 15 is routed to cooling section 46 through line 80. Referring to
Also, as in heat exchanger 48, the heat exchanger 82 is characterized by the use of numerous temperature sensors, including sensors 92 and 94 to sense the inlet and outlet temperatures, respectively, of the cooling medium used in the heat exchanger. Also, one or more sensors, such as sensor 95, can be used to monitor the temperature of the cooling medium within the heat exchanger 82. Temperature sensors 96 and 98 sense the temperature of the food product 15 at the entrance and exit of the heat exchanger 82. Moreover, a plurality of additional temperature sensors 100A, 100B, etc., are positioned along the heat exchanger 82 to sense the temperature of the food product 15 and the cooling medium as it is being cooled by the heat exchanger. In this manner, the entire temperature profile of the food product, as it flows through the heat exchanger 82, may be monitored. In addition, a flow sensor 102 is located adjacent the medium inlet 86 of the heat exchanger 82 to measure the volumetric flow of the coolant through the heat exchanger 82.
From the aseptic sterilizer 16, the sterilized food product 15 is routed to aseptic holding tank 18 or to aseptic filler 20 through a routing network 22. Such routing network includes a line 110 leading from cooling section 46 to a flow diversion valve 112. From the valve 112, the food product flows through line 114 through a 3-way steam supply valve 116. From the valve 116 the sterilized food product flows through a line 128 to a flow valve 130. From the valve 130, the sterilized food product flows through a further line 134 through another valve 124 and then through tank line 126 into the aseptic holding or surge tank 18. During the flow of food product 15 into the aseptic holding tank 18, the food product can be prevented from flowing to the aseptic filler by valve 146 associated therewith. Also, there is positive pressure in line 132. In addition, valve 140 is closed, and a positive pressure exists in line 136.
The aseptic holding tank 18 functions to store the sterilized food product 15 therein, and also to supply such sterilized food product to the aseptic filler 20. The storage tank 18 is charged with sterile air or sterile nitrogen to maintain the stored food product under positive pressure so that it not only flows to the aseptic filler, but also provides back pressure for the sterilization section 16 and the remainder of the system 10 located upstream therefrom. It will be appreciated that other sterile gases may be used in place of nitrogen or air.
Rather than flowing to the aseptic holding tank 18, the sterilized food product 15 may instead flow directly from the aseptic sterilizer 16 to the aseptic filler 20. In this regard, the sterilized food product 15 flows from the cooling section 46 through line 110, through valve 112, through line 114, past 3-way steam supply valve 116, through line 128, through a valve 130, and then through line 132 leading to the aseptic filler 20. During this time the valve 124 is closed so that the food product does not flow to the holding tank 18. The system could be also operated in such a way that the sterilized food product 15 can flow directly from the aseptic sterilizer 16 to either the aseptic filler 20, or the aseptic holding tank 18. In this regard, both 3-way valves, valve 130 and valve 124 are in open position. The sterilized product form line 128 can flow to either the aseptic hold tank or the aseptic filler.
It will be appreciated that the valve 112 serves to isolate the aseptic holding tank and filler from the sterilizer 16. Also, when the food product is flowing either to the aseptic holding tank 18 or the filler 20, steam from source “G” is routed past valve 148, through line 149, through valve 120, and into line 118, thereby forming a steam block in line 118. Condensate from the steam block in line 118 is discharged through steam trap 152. The steam from source “G” is also routed past valve 156 into line 158 and line 166, forming a live steam block to protect the sterilized product 15 flowing through line 114.
It will be appreciated that if any leakage of food product occurs at valve 116, the contact of the food product with steam prevents contamination of the food product from environmental sources, thereby maintaining the sterility of not only the routing network 22, but also the aseptic processing system 10. In this regard, to achieve maximum safety in the present invention, each steam trace is individually monitored through temperature transmitters, with the temperature thereof sent to a programmable logic controller (PLC) (not shown). Also in the present invention, the steam trace may be maintained at a temperature equal to or above the temperature of the product sterilization temperature. If leakage occurs, typically past a valve, and steam flows into the product side or toward the atmosphere (through a valve stem), sterility is not affected because the flow is directed from an aseptic portion of the system 10 towards a non-aseptic portion of the system. If, on the other hand, non-sterile product leaks into a steam trace area because of higher pressure in the food product side, the temperature of the steam barrier will sterilize the leak, thereby avoiding loss of sterility. Of course, when such leaks occur, shut-down of the system 10 likely would be required to repair the leak. The use of steam blocks is particularly helpful in routing network 22 because valves are not foolproof. Even if seals or gaskets are used, food product may still pass by. The same is also true if metal-to-metal contact is used between a valve member and a seat. There will always be small imperfections in the machining of these components at which small leaks may form. Through use of the steam blocks of the present invention the sterility of the aseptic portion of the system 10 is maintained.
When the sterilizer 16 stops production and the sterilized food product 15 is routed to the aseptic filler from the aseptic holding tank 18, the food product flows out of the tank 18 through line 126, past valve 124, through line 134, through valve 130, and then through line 132 to the filler 20. During this process the valve 112 isolates the aseptic holding tank and filler from the sterilizer 16. Also during this time valves 140 and 142 are closed, thereby preventing any flow of food product therethrough. In addition, a steam block is provided in line 114. Such steam is supplied from the source “G” passing through valve 154, through valve 156, line 158, valve 160, line 162, and into line 114. Condensate developed from establishing the steam block in line 114 is discharged through steam trap 164, the condensate reaching the steam trap through valve 160, line 166 and valve 168.
The routing network 22 is also capable of directing the food product from the aseptic sterilizer 16 back to the product feed tank 12, for instance if sterilization of the food product by sterilizer has been completed and the sterilizer is being cleaned. Also, such return flow may occur if it is determined that any one of the scheduled processing parameters is not being met during the sterilization of the food product in the sterilizer 16. With all of the temperature and flow sensors utilized in the sterilizer 16, the present invention is capable of identifying when a monitored parameter, for instance temperature of the food product, does not meet the scheduled value. The present invention is capable of routing such out-of-parameter food product 15 back to the feed tank 12 or to another location. In this regard, the out-of-parameter food product exits cooling section 46 through line 110, passes through valve 112, and then flows through line 150 back through the product feed tank 12. During this time period valves 140 and 142 are closed.
After sterilization of the food product 15 has been completed, it is necessary to clean the product storage tank 12, the pump 14, the aseptic sterilization system 16, and the remainder of the system 10. For the present invention it is possible to clean the tank 10, pump 14, and sterilization system 16 while the aseptic filler 20 is being fed from the aseptic holding tank 18. In this regard, valve 112 is closed so that line 110 is in communication with line 150 and isolated from the aseptic holding tank 18 and the aseptic filler 20 in the manner described above. A cleaning solution, for instance a caustic or acidic liquid, may be routed from storage tank 170 through line 172 to in-feed line 28 leading to tank 12. From the tank 12 the cleaning solution is pumped through the aseptic sterilization section 16 by pump 14, through line 110, through valve 112, and back to the tank 12 through line 150. At some point, the spent cleaning solution is drained off from system 110 for processing and/or disposal.
The system 10 is designed, optimized, operated and monitored in accordance with a validated mathematical model. Such model is used to accurately determine the core temperature of the “worst case” particle flowing through the system. Such particle may be the one that is flowing the fastest through the system and/or the slowest heating particle. Unlike in the processing of canned foods, it is not possible to physically measure the center temperature of particulates flowing through an aseptic processing system. Thus, several math models have been developed in an effort to simulate the center point temperature evolution of the worst case particulate as it flows through the aseptic sterilizing system and the lethality value (F-value) for the worst case particle. The development of such a model is a requirement for FDA's acceptance of aseptic processed low-acid foods with particles the nature of the present invention. Such models include those described in Sastry, Mathematical Evolution of Process Schedules for Aseptic Processing of Low-Acid Foods Containing Discrete Particulates, Journal of Food Science, Vol. 51, No. 5, pp. 1323-1332, 1986; Chandarana, D. I. and Gavin, III, A., Establishing Thermoprocesses for Heterogeneous Foods To Be Processed Aseptically; A Theoretical Comparison of Process Development Methods, Vol. 54, No. 1, pp. 189-204, 1989; Chandarana, D. I., Gavin, III, A., and Wheaton, F. W., Simulation of Parameters for Modeling Aseptic Processing of Foods Containing Particulates, Food Technology, pp. 137-143, 1989; Chang, S. Y. and Toledo, R. T., Heat Transfer and Simulated Sterilization of Particulate Solids in a Continuously Flowing System, Journal of Food Science, Vol. 54, No. 4, pp. 1017-1023 and 1030, 1989.
A further mathematical model will be described in conjunction with the present invention, which utilizes the finite difference methodology for solving the governing transient heat transfer partial differential equations (Eq. 1). For modeling the fastest moving 3-dimensional particulate, for example a potato cube in liquid soup, the heat transfer equation can be written as:
ρCpdT/dt=∇*(k*∇T) (1)
with the following boundary and initial conditions
−k∂T/∂{overscore (n)}=h(Te−Ts) (2)
T=T(x,y,z,t) (3)
T(x,y,z,0)=Ti (4)
where
∇: gradient, ∇≡∂/∂xi+∂/∂yj+∂/∂zk
By solving Equation 1 above, the center or core temperature of the fastest moving particulate in aseptic system 10 can be calculated. With this known core temperature, the lethality value is then calculated according to the following standard equation:
where:
The cooling lethality usually is not considered (the second term on the right side of Equation 5) when developing an aseptic process. The ISV (or Fs-value) for the fastest particulate flowing through the entire system 10 (heating, holding and cooling) is calculated using the following Equation 6:
where v is the volume of the modeled fastest particulate and te here stands for the residence time at the exit of cooling section. The Log Cycle Reduction (LCR) is then calculated based on the following semi-log model:
LCR=Log[No/N]=ISV/Dref (7)
The model calculated LCR value of the fastest particulate can then be used to compare the results of the present model for system 10 with microbial challenge results. The model simulation results must agree with the actual microbial challenge results before it can be used for aseptic process development (including process optimization, process control, and process monitoring).
In order to simulate the core temperatures of the fastest particulate in Equations 1-4, the fluid temperature through the multiphase aseptic processing system 10 must first be developed. The following energy balance equation may be used to develop the fluid temperature profile through the entire aseptic system 10:
ρCpΔVdT/dt=U*A(Te−Tfm)+n*s*h*(Tsm−Tfm) (8)
where
The “average” size particle surface temperature, Tsm is calculated by solving the following governing transient heat transfer partial differential equation:
ρCpdT/dt=∇*(k*∇T) (9)
with the following boundary and initial conditions:
−k∂T/∂{overscore (n)}=h(Te−Ts) (10)
T=T(x,y,z,t) (11)
T(x,y,z,0)=Ti (12)
The definitions for the foregoing equations are the same as for Equations 1-4 set forth above. The simulated particle surface temperatures from Equations 9-12 are then used in Equation 8 to develop the fluid temperature profile of the aseptic processing system 10. Once the fluid temperature profile of the processing system 10 has been developed, the core temperatures of the fastest particulate in the entire aseptic processing system can be simulated using Equations 1-4.
With the foregoing math model, the length of the tubing comprising the holding loop 44 can be calculated and the volume flow rate of the food product 15 through the aseptic sterilizer 16 can be determined. Also, the foregoing model can be utilized to determine the temperature and flow rate of the heating medium in heating section 40 and the cooling medium in cooling section 46. In addition, the foregoing math model can be used to determine the temperature of the food product 15 at each of the temperature sensors 92, 94, 96, 98, 100A, 100B, etc.
An example of the use of the present invention is provided. However, in this example, three swept-surface heat exchanges were used in place of heating section 40, and three swept-heat exchangers are used in cooling section 46. EXAMPLE 1.
An aseptic processing system very similar to that shown in
Table 1 set forth below shows the modeled fluid temperatures at various locations of the aseptic processing system of this example. The modeling results agree closely with the temperatures measured at the noted locations in the aseptic processing system.
As mentioned above, in the operation of system 10, the temperature of the food product 15 is closely monitored, especially in the heating section 40 and the holding section 44 to make certain that the temperature of the food product is sufficient to achieve the required level of lethality in the food product. In this regard, the temperature of the food product at each of the temperature sensors along the heating section 40 and holding section 44 have been predetermined in accordance with the equations set forth above. If during the aseptic sterilization process the temperature monitored by the temperature sensors is below that required by the modeling used in the process scheduling, the portion of the flowing food product that does not meet the modeled temperature requirement is identified and a warning given to the operator. The warning will allow the operator to check the system operation and parameters to ascertain a reason for the deviation in temperature which has occurred. Moreover, the present invention automatically operates the routing matrix 22 to divert the affected food product away from the aseptic holding tank and/or the aseptic filler by routing such food product to line 150 through valve 112 and back to the feed tank 12 or to another destination. See
The first sterilizer 206 may be of a traditional type. This system could be an inclined auger system such as the one described in the U.S. Pat. No. 5,802,961 or a linear belt-conveyor or a vertical spiral belt conveyor system for transferring food particles. Alternatively, the food particles can be directly heated by saturated steam, which typically results in a very high surface heat transfer rate or submerged in other suitable heating medium such as heated water. The food particles 204 may be transported through the first sterilizer 206 on a conveyor belt, an auger system, or other powered transportation system. Such transportation system would provide the same residence time and the same temperature treatment within the first sterilizer for each of the food particles 204. Such residence time would have been calculated previously using standard heat transfer equations, bearing in mind relevant factors including the size and shape of the particulate and their heat transfer coefficients. As an alternative, the first particulates 204 could be transported through the first sterilizer 206 by gravity feed.
From the first sterilizer 206, the treated first particulates 204 are transported by conveyor 209 or other system, such as a transfer valve, to a mixer 210 for mixing with the liquid phase which has been aseptically sterilized and cooled in sterilizer 16′. A predetermined ratio of the sterilized first particulate 204 is mixed with the appropriate volume of liquid in the mixer 210 under aseptic conditions. The sterilized particulate 204 and sterilized liquid 212 are both thoroughly mixed in mixer 210. In addition, the particulate 210 will be at least partially cooled by the cooler liquid in the mixer.
The mixer 210 can be of numerous different constructions. One example of a possible mixer is schematically illustrated in
Still referring to
From the mixer 210 the heterogeneous food product may be routed through a cooling section 214 to further cool the mixture to a low enough temperature for aseptic filling of containers. From the cooling section 214 the mixture may be routed to either the aseptic holding tank 18′ or aseptic filler 20′ through the aseptic routing network 22′ in the same manner as described above with respect to system 10. Cooling section 214 may be similar to cooling section 46′. As such, detailed construction of the cooling section 214 will not be repeated here. When a food particle is completely cooled down in the mixer 210, the product can directly flow into the filler 201 or a second aseptic holding tank 18′.
The aseptic system 200 may be designed to incorporate a plurality of different particulates.
The second particulate 260 is illustrated as sterilized in the second sterilizer 262 operating in parallel with the first sterilizer 206. The particulate 260 may be transferred through the second sterilizer 262 on a conveyor system, through an auger system, by gravity or other appropriate manner. The second particulate 260 may be initially stored in a storage container 264 and then transferred as needed to the second sterilizer 262 through a line or conveyor system 266. The second particulate 260 may be transferred from the second sterilizer 262 to the mixer 210 through conveyor or line 266. As in the first sterilizer 206, the second sterilizer 262 may include a measuring device 270 to measure the weight, volume, or other physical attribute of the sterilized second particulate 260 entering the mixer 210 to verify that the correct mixing ratio was being accomplished.
As mentioned above, other particulates in addition to particulates 204 and 260 may be utilized in conjunction with the present invention. It may be that such other particulates will require their own sterilizer(s) prior to being routed to mixer 210 for mixing with the liquid 212. As also noted above, an advantage of the system 200 is that the particulate component of the heterogeneous mixture can be quickly heated to achieve a required lethality level bearing in mind the “worst case” particle (typically the largest). Moreover, the liquid phase 212 would not have to be retained in the holding section 44′ for as long as would be required if particulates were also in the liquid phase within the holding loop 44′. As a consequence, through the present invention, likely both the liquid and solid phases of the food product may be heated more quickly, and reducing the likelihood of overcooking the food product, thereby more likely retaining the color, flavor, and “freshness” of the food product components. As can be understood, the overall quality of the resulting food product can be much higher than traditional “canning” of food product or even sterilizing the food product as a heterogeneous mixture in the aseptic sterilizer 16′.
The particulates 204″ from sterilizer 206′ are cooled in a separate cooling subsystem 302 that can be of various constructions. One such construction may be a vacuum flash cooling system, which are well known in the industry. Such vacuum flash cooling system may include multiple stages, for example, stages 306A, 306B, and 306C. Vacuum is applied to the particulate 204 in each of these stages whereby moisture is rapidly evaporated from the particulate surface thereby quickly cooling the particulate. The vacuum for each of the stages 306A, 306B, and 306C, etc., is controlled so that the integrity of the food particles is properly maintained. In this regard the vacuum in each subsequent stage is stronger than the previous one. The particulate 204″ may be transported through the cooling subsystem 302 on a conveyor belt, an auger system, by gravity or other appropriate manner. From the cooling subsystem 302, the sterilized and cooled particulates 204″ are transported to mixer 210″ through line or conveyor 308 for mixing with the sterilized liquid 212″ in a manner similar to that described with respect to sterilization system 200.
As in the sterilization system 200 described above, the sterilization system 300 may also be designed to accommodate a plurality of different particulates that are mixed with the liquid phase 212″. As described above, such particulates may be of a different type than particulate 204″, may be of a different initial temperature, or may be of a different particle size, or otherwise distinguishable from the particulate 204″ so that the protocol for sterilizing the additional particulate(s) may be different than for the first particulate 204′. The second and subsequent particulates may be treated in their own sterilizers.
Rather than utilizing individual cooling subsystems 302 and 304, it may be possible to utilize a single cooling subsystem for all of the different particulates that are mixed with the liquid phase 212″. It may be that one or more of the particulate types may not have to pass through the entire cooling subsystem, or even if all the particulates pass through the cooling subsystem, it may be satisfactory that some of the particulate types are cooled to a lesser or greater degree than other of the particulate types. In addition, rather than using a mixer 210″, it may be satisfactory that the particulates are introduced into the liquid phase 212″, for instance, into line 110″ using a particulate metering device, which are known in the industry.
It is to be understood that the modeling for aseptic systems 200 and 300 are much more simple than required to model system 10, because the particulates 204, 204′, 260 and 260′ are heated separately from the liquid phase 212 and 212′. Such modeling equations are well known to those skilled in the art.
As discussed above with respect to routing matrices 22, 22′ and 22″, if the aseptic sterilizers 16, 16′ or 16″ becomes, or is rendered, unsterile, the matrix 22′″ is designed to divert the unsterile food product away from the aseptic holding tank 18′″ or aseptic filter 20′″. This is accomplished by diverting the unsterile food product through valve 112′″ and through line 150′″ back to storage tank 12′″. However, if the aseptic filler 20′″ is rendered unsterile, the entire matrix has to be isolated from the aseptic holding tank 18′″. In this regard, closing valve 124′″ at the aseptic holding tank will preserve the sterility in the holding tank. However, thereafter it is necessary to sterilize line 132′″. During the sterilization process, unsterile water or other sterilizing fluid will have flown by valve 124′″, which is in ‘closed’ position. If a leakage occurs in valve 124′″, the sterile food product in tank 18′″ could be contaminated. A more serious condition could even occur if chemicals are used to clean line 132, and such chemicals leak past valve 124.
To address this possibility, the embodiment of the present invention shown in
If the aseptic filler 20′″ becomes unsterile, valve 400 is closed and valves 402 and 404 are opened to create a steam block between the aseptic holding tank 18′″ and the rest of the matrix. Thereupon the filler line 132′″ and the aseptic filler 20′″ can be sterilized without contaminating the food product stored in the aseptic holding tank 18′″. After the sterilization has been completed, valve 400 can be re-opened and valves 402 and 404 closed. It will be appreciated that in the embodiment of the present invention shown in
As another aspect of the present invention shown in
As a further aspect of the present invention shown in
While an embodiment of the invention has been illustrated and described, it will be appreciated that various changes can be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/491,433, filed Jul. 30, 2003.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60491433 | Jul 2003 | US |