This invention relates to a recycling system and method and in particular, to a system and method of recycling granular and non-granular coated asphalt based material such as new and used roofing shingles.
Roofing shingles, rolled roofing material and other asphalt containing construction products are traditionally manufactured utilizing asphalt, which is derived from crude oil. Asphalt prices have recently increased even more rapidly than crude oil prices. In addition to the use and cost of crude oil in the asphalt manufacturing process, the process of manufacturing asphalt shingles further utilizes a considerable amount of fossil fuels heating both the asphalt and the fillers so that they can be combined. Typically, approximately 65% filler is mixed with approximately 35% asphalt. In order to create a mixture having a usable viscosity, the asphalt is heated to 450° F. while the filler is heated to approximately 350° F. prior to the two components being mixed together.
Considerable waste is involved with the manufacture and use of asphalt roofing materials, such as shingles and roll roofing membranes. For example, each new asphalt roofing shingle has cutout tabs that are removed and discarded (this waste will be called “manufacturer's asphalt roofing shingle waste”) while old shingle materials removed from existing buildings (this waste will be called “post-consumer asphalt shingle waste”) also adds to a significant amount of roofing material waste. In the US alone, 11 million tons of post-consumer asphalt shingles are removed from roofs annually. Approximately 10 million of these tons are buried in landfills. Not only are landfill costs increasing, but access to landfills for recyclable products is becoming more restricted since roofing shingles are products which do not degrade. Asphalt shingles pose an additional particular problem to landfills because they restrict natural water movement causing delays with the natural decay and decomposition of other items in the landfill. The asphalt shingles themselves do not degrade and stay permanently in the landfill.
Recycling of all types of roofing material waste has been discussed and attempted but has not been terribly successful. The waste generated from asphalt roofing materials presents a significant recycling as well as environmental concern because of the composition of the roofing material. Typical asphalt shingles and rolled roofing material are composed of a cellulose fiber or fiberglass mat saturated with asphalt, an asphalt coating on the top surface of the mat, and granules disposed on the top of the coating. Such materials are difficult to break down and have typically required complex recycling processes.
Past attempts at recycling asphalt shingles have failed to reduce the shingle granules to a size small enough for the recycled shingle material to be reused. If the granules in the recycled shingle material are not reduced to a fine powder, the granules will not remain suspended in an asphalt solution and the recycled shingle material cannot be reused in roofing or other products. In addition, the granules pose a problem in that if they are suspended in the asphalt mixture used to saturate the roofing material mat, the granules which are sharp, small pieces of stone will potentially cut or tear the mat material thereby potentially causing the roofing material to fail. Too fine of a granule also poses a problem in that the fine material does not have a significant use and is therefore not sellable.
In typical asphalt shingle construction, 42 percent of the weight of the shingle is surfacing granules. The granules are usually made of trap rock which is colored by a ceramic type process. The typical mesh size runs from 2 percent being retained on a 10 mesh screen to 2 percent retained on a 40 mesh screen. The sand backing accounts for 5 percent of the weight with the mesh running 2 percent retained on a 50 mesh and the rest smaller down to 25 to 35 mesh. The limestone filler runs from 2 percent retained on a 70 mesh to finer. Consequently, the hard minerals can be removed by passing the material through a screen having a mesh size between 35-50 mesh. The preferred mesh size is 36-38 mesh. If the granule or sand particles are broken, they could pass into the filled coating powder causing glass mat weakening related problems. 49 percent of the shingle weight is filler and asphalt or “filled coating”. The asphalt and filler are inseparable in this process with each particle of limestone completely coated with asphalt. The coarsest filler particles have 2 percent retained on a 70 mesh screen, but even though they are coated with asphalt they easily pass through 30-50 mesh screens. 5 percent of the shingle is sand. These sand particles fall within the limestone filler. While sand is a hard particle this small amount can be tolerated or removed using air separation, thereby exploiting the density difference between filled coating and sand. 2 percent of the shingle composition is the aforementioned glass mat. After processing, the fiber remains bound up with the asphalt/filler portion of the mix in the form of a “flake” and is screened out using a ¼ mesh screen. The remaining 2 percent consists of adhesives used to bond the shingles together.
Some past methods of recycling asphalt roofing material have used milling machines, such as rolling mills, bag mills, ball mills, hammer mills, saw mills, etc. to produce a recycled roofing material which can be used only in road construction or as other similar “filler” material. However, merely milling the shingle material in a reduction mill without further processing has been unsuccessful in either reducing the granules in the shingle material to a fine mesh so that the recycled asphalt can be reused in manufacturing new roofing products or in separating out the granules.
Asphalt roads are comprised of six percent paving grade asphalt and ninety-four percent aggregate. The particle size distribution is very specific and is carefully monitored by state and federal agencies. Attempts to use post factory and post-consumer shingles have been stopped by four major issues. First, ⅜ inch chips of recycled asphalt based roofing material (the standard currently in use) will not dissolve in the mixing process, so little asphalt is freed up for incorporation into the road (the entrained mix energy is lost) which causes the amount of asphalt and mineral to be inconsistent. Second, the plastic mylar on the back of all shingles is left as 4-5 inch by 1 inch pieces. Third, the nails may not be removed and fourth, the shingles contain too many fines. All of these issues create their own series of problems in recycling the materials for reuse. Nails cannot be present in the recycled material that is to be used, as nails in a road would pose a serious problem. Likewise, the presence of fines in pavement creates air pockets and voids that affect the HMA performance in terms of rutting and cracking. Shingles contain 30-40 percent fines and the amount of fines needs to be reduced as low as possible because the fines increase viscosity causing more roller energy to be required (more passes over the pavement while hot) and they can have serious road quality implications. A new process is needed that resolves all of these issues.
One such apparatus for recycling roofing shingles is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,706,893 to Brock. This apparatus includes a hammer mill that comminutes the shingles and a vessel that subsequently dries then mixes the recycled shingle material with liquid asphalt, for recycling as an asphalt paving composition. This milling process will not reduce the granules in the shingle material to a small enough size for the shingle material to be reused in applications other than an asphalt paving composition. Moreover, portions of the recycled material that is too fine is considered “fines” in the paving industry and are unwanted in that they significantly increase the viscosity of the paving mixture and must be washed off or takes significantly more time to pack down.
Another shingle reducing apparatus is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,385,426 to Omann. This complex apparatus includes a shredder, two hammer mills, and two heated vessels for drying the shingle material after it has been reduced. This apparatus further requires spraying the shingles with water prior to entering the first hammer mill. This extremely complex and involved process requiring two hammer mills also is not capable of completely reducing the granules in the recycled shingle material to a fine mesh or powder.
One reason milling machines have been unsuccessful in reducing the granules in the recycled shingle material is because the shingle material was not heated as it was milled. In the past, heating the milling machine as the shingle material is milled was considered hazardous because of pressure build up in the closed milling vessel or heating vessel as a result of moisture in the shingle material. Heating would also make hammer mills gum up and not work because the asphalt would become sticky.
The typical recycling operation involves passing the material through a hammer mill to create ⅜ inch chips. Hammer mills function by revolving a pivot arm at a high speed and impinging the material between a plate and the hammer on the end of a pivot arm. The material is constrained in a chamber by a screen with holes of the desire output size. The impingement created breaks some of the surfacing granules into a fine powder and leaves the rest of the material in pieces the size of the screen holes (usually ⅜ inches). The only use for this material is in Hot Mix Asphalt for roads. This material cannot be used for asphalt roofing products because any hard minerals such as the surfacing granules or the sand used on the underside of the shingles (to prevent sticking in the bundles) cannot be used. Shingles are made by saturating and coating a fiberglass mat (13-15 mm diameter fibers, 1 to 1.5 inches long glued at fiber cross over junctions with a binder with a typical weight of 1.7 pounds per 100 square feet) with 65 percent limestone (a soft mineral) filler and 35 percent oxidized asphalt. This mixture is called “filled coating”. The surface is then covered with granules and the underside covered with sand. The hard minerals, granules and sand, cannot be present in quantity in the filler/asphalt mix because the coating process is roll over roll with the fiberglass mat passing through a nip roller. If excessive hard minerals are present, the pressure created within the nip rollers causes breakage or abrading of the glass fibers. After exposure on the roof, the shingles would tear due to the weakened reinforcement. This problem caused widespread roof failures in the industry. At that time, rock dust was sometimes used as filler, so the same problem would occur if hard granules or sand were allowed into any fiberglass mat based roofing product.
Accordingly, what is needed is a recycling apparatus or system and method to recycle new and used (post-consumer) asphalt based materials, such as asphalt shingles, rolled roofing and tar paper and the like that may include granules, fibers or other particles. The asphalt material to be recycled, which may be in bundles, is broken up and separated and then provided to a recycling vessel. The recycle vessel includes necessary components which shred or tear the material being recycled and which stirs the material and makes sure all material is ground. The resulting course to fine powder can be separated by screening and stored as power or compressed into bricks or briquettes for later use and introduction into a mixing vessel with virgin or flux asphalt for use in manufacturing other asphalt based products such as roofing materials, road paving composition and roadway crack filler material, for example. The asphalt shingle recycling system and method is able to adequately process both new and post-consumer asphalt shingles into material of usable type and size as well as a material sorter which is able to sort the processed material into material of different sizes or grades for either more processing or for use in one or more applications. The process must remove all the offending hard minerals while capturing the filled coating.
Accordingly, the present invention provides an asphalt material recycling apparatus and method that is capable of recycling asphalt shingle material and reducing or sorting out of granules, cellulose fibers, fiberglass fibers and other particles in the asphalt shingle material to a course to fine mesh powder that can be stored for and later either used along with liquid asphalt or used in a dry form for various purposes.
One or more methods of recycling the asphalt based material may be used. For example, one exemplary method of recycling asphalt material includes cryogenically milling the asphalt material in an apparatus that can be sufficiently cooled such that the asphalt material to be recycled is essentially chipped, shredded and broken down into fine particles for further use in various processes such as the manufacture of asphalt shingles or roadway asphalt mixture.
Cryogenic processing can be accomplished using any of the previously mentioned media containing mills. Either the mill is cooled or the material is cooled before entering the mill or while in the mill. Cold grinding is preferred even though the mechanical energy used to grind becomes heat, which must be overcome with cooling energy. The paving industry requires a coarser grind than roofing materials because the fine particles interfere with the compaction process of asphalt paving material. This is due to the increase in asphalt viscosity that occurs with the introduction of particles of 200 mesh or finer. The cold grinding process lends itself to a coarser grind because the process can be stopped and the material tested very rapidly using screens to ascertain the particle size distribution. Hot asphalt testing requires a lengthy process of removing the asphalt with solvents, drying the remaining particles and then screening. Typically, this would take longer than the grinding cycle. The cold grind process produces a powder (almost like gun or black powder) that can be easily stored outside and conveyed into the paving process without modifying the typical paving plant equipment. This convenience is important to the marketability of the product.
In one embodiment, the present invention features a method for recycling asphalt based material. The method comprises the acts of receiving an amount of asphalt based material to be recycled, the asphalt based material to be recycled includes at least some amount of the asphalt based material that is larger in size than 6″×6″. Providing the received amount of asphalt based material to be recycled to a recycler device, the recycler device operating in one mode selected from the modes consisting of a heated mode and a cooled mode. The recycler device containing the received amount of asphalt based material to be recycled in operated in the one mode. The recycler device operating in this mode is configured to provide recycled asphalt based material having a size smaller than 6″×6″. The method next includes sorting the recycled asphalt based material received from the recycler device by size of the recycled asphalt based material and then storing the sorted recycled asphalt based material for later use.
In one embodiment, the asphalt based material to be recycled includes asphalt based roofing material. The asphalt-based roofing material may include new, unused asphalt-based roofing material and previously used asphalt based roofing material, while the asphalt based roofing material may include asphalt shingles and rolled roofing material. The asphalt based roofing material may include a top surface which is covered in granules.
During the recycling process, the recycler device may recycle the asphalt based material to a size no greater than 10 mesh or to a size between 10 mesh and 200 mesh. The recycler device may be operated in a cooled mode, and wherein the cooled mode is achieved by utilizing one of a cooling jacket surrounding the recycler device in which is circulated cooling fluid or the addition of dry ice to the recycler device in addition to the asphalt based material being recycled.
The act of sorting the recycled asphalt based material may be accomplished utilizing a screen sorter. The sorted and stored recycled asphalt based material may be utilized in the making of one or more products selected from the group of products consisting of asphalt based roofing shingles, asphalt based rolled roofing, asphalt based road paving compositions and asphalt based paving crack filler compositions.
In another embodiment, the invention features a method for recycling asphalt based material. The method comprises the acts of receiving an amount of asphalt based material to be recycled, the asphalt based material to be recycled including at least some amount of the asphalt based material that is larger in size than 6″×6″. The method next includes providing the received amount of asphalt based material to be recycled to a recycler device following which the recycler device is operated in a dry manner so as to provide recycled asphalt based material having a size smaller than 6″×6″.
The recycled asphalt based material received from the recycler device is then sorted by size of the recycled asphalt based material and stored for later use. The act of sorting the recycled asphalt based material may be accomplished utilizing a screen sorter. At least a portion of the sorted and stored recycled asphalt based material is utilized in the making of one or more products selected from the group of products consisting of asphalt based roofing shingles, asphalt based rolled roofing, asphalt based road paving compositions and asphalt based paving crack filler compositions. The recycled asphalt based material typically includes roofing material granules, and wherein the act of sorting the recycled asphalt based material received from the recycler device includes separating the granules from the remainder of the recycled asphalt based material.
In yet another embodiment, the invention features a method of manufacturing an asphalt based product utilizing a slurry including virgin asphalt and ground recycled asphalt based material. The method comprises the acts of receiving an amount of asphalt based material to be recycled, the asphalt based material to be recycled typically including at least some amount of the asphalt based material that is larger in size than 6″×6″. The method next provides the received amount of asphalt based material to be recycled to a recycler device which in turn is operated in a manner so as to provide recycled asphalt based material having a size smaller than 6″×6″. The recycled asphalt based material received from the recycler device is sorted by size and stored for later use.
The method continues by adding at least one of virgin asphalt and flux asphalt to a heated slurry tank following which the method adds at least a portion of the sorted, recycled asphalt based material to the heated slurry tank containing the at least one of virgin asphalt and flux asphalt to create a slurry containing liquid asphalt and a suspension of sorted recycled asphalt based material. The heated slurry including the suspension of sorted recycled asphalt based material is provided to a manufacturing process which utilizes the slurry in making an asphalt based material product.
Also featured is a method of making a roofing product comprising the acts of forming a processed, asphalt slurry suspension comprising a ground, recycled asphalt based material component derived from recycled asphalt based materials and a virgin asphalt based component, wherein the ground, recycled asphalt based material component comprises particles of recycled asphalt based roofing materials which have been reduced in size to have an average particle size of between 70 and 200 mesh. The processed, asphalt slurry suspension is then used in the manufacturing of a roofing product. The virgin asphalt based component may include asphalt flux.
The invention further features a method of making an asphalt based material utilizing recycled, ground recycled asphalt based material comprising the acts of forming a processed, asphalt slurry suspension that comprises a ground, recycled asphalt based material component derived from recycled asphalt based materials and a virgin based asphalt component including virgin asphalt with or without asphalt flux. The ground, recycled asphalt based material component comprises particles of recycled asphalt based roofing materials which have been reduced in size to have an average particle size of between 70 and 200 mesh. The processed, asphalt slurry suspension used in the manufacture of one or more asphalt based products selected from the group of products consisting of asphalt based roofing shingles, asphalt based rolled roofing, asphalt based road paving compositions and asphalt based paving crack filler compositions.
The invention also features a method of making an asphalt based paving composition utilizing recycled, ground recycled asphalt based material. The method includes the acts of forming a processed, asphalt slurry suspension. The asphalt slurry suspension comprises a ground, recycled asphalt based material component derived from recycled asphalt based materials and a virgin based asphalt component including virgin asphalt with or without asphalt flux. The ground, recycled asphalt based material component comprises particles of recycled asphalt based roofing materials which have been reduced in size to have an average particle size of between 10 and 200 mesh. The method also includes providing an aggregate material and utilizing the processed, asphalt slurry suspension and the aggregate material in the manufacture of an asphalt based paving composition.
These and other features and advantages of the present invention will be better understood by reading the following detailed description, taken together with the drawings wherein:
An asphalt material recycling system and method 10,
According to one embodiment of the asphalt material recycling system method of the present invention, an exemplary system 10,
After separation by the material conditioner 16, a primary size reducing unit 72,
The shingle waste material 12 to be processed exit for the material conditioner 16 (if present) on a sorting belt 22. This stage optionally allows human or mechanical means for removing unwanted debris such as nails, wood, metal or the like. The separation may be done by a magnet 38 or by hand using one or more individuals sorting the material. The sorting belt 22 may also feature a plurality of teeth 20 on the belt 22 itself and/or suspended over and/or along the side of the belt 22. As presently contemplated, the recycling system will be operated in batch mode and thus, a predetermined amount of waste shingle material 12 will be provided to the material conditioner 16, passed over sorting belt 22 and then inserted into the recycler 24. However, it is also contemplated and within the scope of the present invention that the system 10 can be run in a continuous mode.
A secondary size reduction unit 74,
The exemplary recycler 24 available from H.C. Davis Sons Mfg. is shown in greater detail in
In a preferred embodiment, the mixing paddles 54 are approximately 4-6 inches from the interior wall. The recycler 24 is preferably an almost completely closed vessel, which facilitates the energy efficient addition of dry ice and which contains the talc dust, which is an improvement over hammer mills and hogger style devices, which are open and retain the materials in a chamber for only a few seconds.
Any number of paddles 54 as well as any combination of serrated teeth paddles 58 and smooth edged paddles 58 may be used. For example, there may be 8 paddles, with 4 long paddles and 4 short paddles. The paddles 54 are designed to move the material from an inlet to an outlet of the recycler 24 in a spiral down or “FIG. 8” manner. The rotation has the effect of further reducing the asphalt based product 12 by abrasion between the interior wall and the paddles 54. The paddles 54 perform a significant grinding action by forcing the granule laden asphalt based product 12 to abrade upon itself.
The paddles 54 are designed to thoroughly mix in any talc, limestone or other fine material or powder with the material to be recycled. The paddles 54 also convey the asphalt based product 12 into the choppers and mix in any dry ice 46. Talc powder is typically added to the recycler 24 to prevent agglomeration and to reduce adhesion, which is necessary for the screening process. The talc material is preferably 200 mesh talc or other material or powder added at a rate of approximately 6-8%. The talc is mixed thoroughly by the paddles 54.
Talc is a good flow agent and it also blinds to the sticky exposed edges of the asphalt material being recycled preventing (or at least reducing) the entire mixture from sticking together. Dry ice may also be added to the mixture to keep the frictional energy of the mixing from the paddles 54 and the choppers 32 from heating up the asphalt mixture causing it to stick together. Problems may develop in the mixer such as asphalt sticking to the walls and/or plugging any screener if the temperature of the mixture gets above 80° F. The lower the temperature the faster the screening can occur. The recycler 24 further includes one or more high-speed or impact choppers 32 shown in greater detail in
In another embodiment, one or more impact choppers 32,
In another embodiment, the asphalt based products 12 are fed into the recycler from above, passing first through a knife chopper 82
In the preferred embodiment, the recycler 24 is operated in a cool or cooled mode. The recycling chamber 26 may be jacketed and 30° cooled glycol cooling liquid may be circulated around the jacket and serves to cool the recycling chamber 26. In addition, dry ice may be added to the recycling chamber 26 along with the shingle waste to be recycled. The dry ice serves to drive out any moisture in the material to be recycled and most importantly, makes the material very brittle thus facilitating breaking down the shingle waste by the high-speed choppers and the mixing blade of a horizontal mixer system. Asphalt becomes brittle and shatters at about 35 F, whereas hogger type systems must use brute force to shred the shingles. Problems develop in the recycler 24 (asphalt sticking to the walls) and the sorter 42 (plugging of screens with asphalt) when the temperature rises above 80° F. The lower the temperature of the material, the faster the screening process can occur.
The present invention may feature either of the cooling methods alone or in combination with one another. When using a blend of materials in the recycler, approximately 50 pounds of dry ice per ton of material being recycled is preferably utilized. Although dry ice 46 and a jacket coolant 44 are preferable, other cooling methods, such as liquid nitrogen, are contemplated and within the scope of the present invention.
The material recycling system 10 has the ability to recycle manufacturer's asphalt roofing shingle waste, post-consumer asphalt shingle waste, or a combination of the two products. In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, a mix or blend of both manufacturers' asphalt roofing shingle waste and post-consumer asphalt shingle waste is used in the system. The blend provides a superior end product, which is easier to handle and more favorable for creation of new asphalt products. If only manufacturer's asphalt roofing shingle waste is used, the asphalt based product 12 is too pliable and in turn needs to be cooled in order to make the material more brittle. This cooling process requires both the jacket coolant 44 and dry ice 46. If only post-consumer asphalt shingle waste is used, the asphalt based product 12 does not need as much cooling and generally dry ice 46 is not necessary and the jacket coolant 44 is sufficient. Alternatively, the recycler 24 may be operated in a hot or heated mode. In this heated mode, asphalt, oil, wax, polymer or other material may be added to make a slurry suitable to be added to an attritor or to further process the slurry in a ball mill. The plenum 14 feeding the material conditioner 16 may include choppers or grinders to initially condition or shred the material being input into the recycler 24. The teeth and half plows of the horizontal mixer system keep the unit from jamming even if the bundles are put in whole. The differing distance from the vessel walls along the alternation of serration and plows allows the design to function properly.
Because it is contemplated that the system of the present invention will be operated in batch mode, the recycler 24 will be operated with a predetermined amount of shingle waste material for a predetermined amount of time to achieve a recycled product having the desired coarseness or fineness. The dry ice will evaporate as a gas.
A final processing step may include the application of talc, limestone, or other fine material to the end product to coat each piece, making the end product less sticky. When using only post-consumer asphalt shingle waste, 0-50 pounds per ton of fine material is used. When using only manufacturer's asphalt roofing shingle waste, 100+ pounds per ton of fine material is used. When using the preferred blend of the two materials, 50-100 pounds per ton of fine material is used.
The processed or recycled material, and now in the form of granules, asphalt powder (filled coating) and/or flakes, will be removed from the recycler mechanism 24 as shown generally at 40,
In the preferred embodiment, the primary separation from the process is at 30-60 mesh, which allows for separation between the bottom mesh size of the surface granule specification and the top mesh size of the filler specification. This preferred separation is also the ideal size for manufacturing other asphalt based products, such as road crack filler, roof cements and roof coatings. As an example, the 200 mesh material can be reused by the asphalt roofing industry because the 200 mesh size complies with the current specification and manufacturing process. Once sorted, the recycled asphalt material of one or more various sizes 41, 43, 45 or 47 can be used immediately or stored for later use.
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the primary sorter 42 is a multi-vibe high frequency ball screener,
Each level 60 of the primary screener 42 (except the lowermost level) features a screen 66. The screen 66 covers a tray 68, located below the screen 66. The tray 68 may be broken into various compartments as shown in
The system 10 may further include the use of an air separation device 98. The air separation device 98 is designed to remove sand and granules from a 40 mesh screen output of the primary sorter 42.
In a further embodiment of the present invention, all “large” particles of the asphalt based product 12, which cannot pass through the uppermost level screen of the primary screener 42 are sent back to the recycler 24 for a second processing trip 80 through the recycler 24. In this second processing trip 80, the larger materials of the asphalt based product 12 are fed into the top of recycler 24, above the process material level of the recycler 24, with a gravity feed. Positioning a chopper so that it directly feeds into the recycler 24 has the advantage of immediate exposure to talc. The chopper opens up new untalced asphalt sites that would cause sticking unless they were immediately re-talced. The gravity feed allows the asphalt based product 12 to establish a free fall. The asphalt based product 12 then passes through a rotating cutter or return line chopper 82 with horizontal blade rotation located at the top of the recycler. The cutter is preferably maintained within a housing (not shown) so that a secondary impact occurs. The cutter 82 is preferably a knife chopper,
The size sorted, recycled asphalt material dissolves or mixes (in suspension) easily in and with virgin and/or flux asphalt in standard equipment because it is available as a 200 mesh (or other size i.e. 30-50 mesh) powder and it also coats any granules. This beneficial coating occurs in the recycling machine. The hot mix process consists of heating the asphalt and adding the sorted recycled asphalt material then mixing them in a device such as a pug mill. The pug mill wets out or completely coats the aggregate with asphalt. The asphalt combines the aggregate together like a glue to form the road. This process fully exploits the entrained mix energy and solves the problems that have been observed with attempts to recycle post factory and post-consumer shingles.
The industry currently uses ⅜ inch chips and these ⅜ chips will not dissolve in the mixing process, which has caused a major issue in the recycling process. The ⅜ chips have caused a major issue with consistency because the chips are made in a “hogging” process. A massive amount of horsepower is required to rip the shingles to the required size. The shingles are inconsistent as they age and due to the removal from the roof, the hogger process adds to the problem. No attempt can be made to control either the particle size or the percentage of asphalt. Therefore, the new process allows for either solids or asphalts to be readily added back, such that the product will be consistent.
The currently used hogger process uses magnets to remove nails, with only about a 90 percent success rate on ferrous nails and very little success rate with aluminum nails. In order to remove all of the nails to ensure nails are not present in the final material, a two-step process is used. The new two-step process uses a screen in combination with air classification. This dual process assures that no nails will pass into the final product. Either air or screens also easily separate out the plastic film. It is also important to create an end product that can create a pavement that has minimal voids and air pockets in order to ensure superior quality. The new process easily allows for the percentage of fines to be reduced to at least 12 percent.
The combination of air and screens also serves to separate out the saturated felt fraction. In organic shingles, the saturated felt fraction accounts for 18 percent of the raw material mix. The material is composed of 37 percent asphalt and 63 percent cellulose fibers. The asphalt is mildly oxidized to a melt point of 150 F retaining more of the oil content (other asphalt is oxidized to 235 F) and is not mixed with filler. This asphalt is located in the center of the shingle and has not been degraded by UV exposure. This saturating asphalt is the most valuable component in the shingle and it is inseparable from the cellulose fiber, but this is a positive in applications that require cellulose and asphalt such as roof cements. This fraction of the shingle also has the ability to be stored with only mild agitation. This can be contrasted with “filled coating” with requires significant agitation to keep the dense filler in solution. The saturated felt segment can be stored in the tanks normally used by the paving industry. The saturated felt fraction can also be combusted in oil burning equipment if it is mixed with standard oil and the resulting cellulose becomes a valuable source of energy.
In a preferred embodiment, the method creates approximately 53 percent asphalt coated granules, 40 percent filled coating or asphalt powder and 17 percent flakes. For example, when incorporating surfacing granules into hot mix asphalt, shingles are currently chipped into ⅜ pieces and added to road mix. As compared to ⅜ inch chips both the granular portion and the filled coating asphalt powder fraction can be successfully incorporated into HMA. This occurs because the granules are coated with filled coating and the filled coating (as a separate fraction) is in a powdered form, so both readily go into solution in the typical HMA mixing procedure. The ⅜ chips are too large with the filled coating and is buffered by both granules and sand and the glass mat tenaciously holds the chips together. Consequently, the filled coating portion cannot be incorporated into the road mix. The entrained mix energy is also lost with ⅜ inch chips because the asphalt does not go into solution. Therefore, by removing the fiberglass reinforced flakes (or in the case of the older shingles where the flakes are reinforced with cellulose fiber) the major source of raw material inconsistency is removed. The chips may contain either fiberglass or cellulose reinforcement or a mixture. Presorting by shingle type is not done because an individual house may have both types of shingles in different layers. The present method isolates the filled coating portion which is same in both types of products. These “flakes” are very difficult to breakdown because of the reinforcement. However, they can be ground and liquefied using a hot process. It is contemplated and within the scope of the current invention, that the portion which cannot be recycled can be reclaimed using an attritor, whereby the portion can be used in crack filler. Granules that fall into the 11-50 mesh particle distribution size have been carefully selected by the roofing industry because every void on a roof surface must be filled. A major purpose of granules is to protect the asphalt from UV degradation. The granules are designed for packing and have a very low void volume. These properties make the particles ideal for use in Hot Mix asphalt and cold patch used to repair pot holes in roadways.
Particles of a predetermined and appropriate size may be provided to be used in an asphalt mixture for roadways while particles of appropriate size may be provided to be reused in making asphalt shingles. In this case, previously recycled and sorted asphalt material particles or appropriate size are added to virgin flux asphalt to form a slurry in a stirred mixing tank or wet grinding mill such as a ball mill or attritor or the like. Virgin asphalt is asphalt that has not been used in a product while flux asphalt (sometimes called asphalt flux) is an oil used to reduce the consistency or viscosity of hard (previously used—for example used roofing material) asphalt to the point that it is usable or as required for use. Other uses for the recycled asphalt particles are contemplated as well. The recycled asphalt particles may include granular material, which is often placed on top of roofing shingles. The recycled asphalt shingle waste particles may be stored and provided in powder form or alternatively, could be pressed into bricks or briquettes for multiple uses and for ease of storage and shipping.
One of the products that may be produced using the output of the process and method of the present invention are boards. These boards include, in one embodiment, a layer of fiberglass mat on the top and bottom surface with the ground shingles in the center. These boards have a preferred thickness of ¼″. This makes a rigid product that has many uses including recover boards, sheathing boards and sound transmission reduction boards.
Recover boards are boards that go in between an old commercial low sloped roof and a new roof. The older roof is left in place. Although recover boards are presently available, the asphalt portion is comprised of virgin asphalt and filler, usually limestone. In accordance with the present invention, the grinding process frees up the fiberglass or other organic fibers, which become reinforcements in the new board. Tall oil may be added and which has a very positive function in the product. It is a natural glue that makes the board much stronger than other prior art products. This is important because the board is the foundation for a new roof. The board is mechanically fastened through the old roof and into the roof deck. The new roof is essentially glued to the top surface of the recover board. Boards can typically be made with one half to two thirds less Tall oil then flux asphalt. Either of these materials is a fuel so less is better.
Another product that can be made from the present invention is sheathing. Commercial buildings usually have a layer of special gypsum board beneath the metal, brick or concrete exterior. The main feature of this product is that it again passes a class A fire rating.
Yet another product that can be made from the present invention is sound board. Asphalt has proven substantial sound transmission reduction properties. Again, a class A fire rating is essential. This product may be used beneath a layer of gypsum on the interior walls of a building.
The present invention is not intended to be limited to a device or method which must satisfy one or more of any stated or implied objects or features of the invention and should not be limited to the preferred, exemplary, or primary embodiment(s) described herein. Modifications and substitutions by one of ordinary skill in the art are considered to be within the scope of the present invention, which is not to be limited except by the allowed claims and their legal equivalents.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/930,516 filed on Jun. 28, 2013 entitled “ASPHALT MATERIAL RECYCLING SYSTEM AND METHOD”, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/845,179 filed on Jul. 28, 2010 entitled “Asphalt Material Recycling System and Method” and claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/230,426 filed on Jul. 31, 2009 entitled “Asphalt Material Recycling System and Method”; this application is also a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/680,619 filed Nov. 19, 2012 entitled “RECYCLED ASPHALT PAVING FORMULATION AND METHOD OF MAKING SAME” which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/495,477 filed on Jun. 13, 2012 and which in turn is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/845,179 filed Jul. 28, 2010, which application Ser. No. 13/680,619 claims priority to U.S. provisional patent application Nos. 61/560,987 filed on Nov. 17, 2011 and 61/659,127 filed on Jun. 13, 2012, all of which are incorporated fully herein by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61230426 | Jul 2009 | US | |
61560987 | Nov 2011 | US | |
61659127 | Jun 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12845179 | Jul 2010 | US |
Child | 13930516 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13930516 | Jun 2013 | US |
Child | 14314279 | US | |
Parent | 13680619 | Nov 2012 | US |
Child | 12845179 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13495477 | Jun 2012 | US |
Child | 13680619 | US | |
Parent | 12845179 | Jul 2010 | US |
Child | 13495477 | US |