1. Field of the Invention
The present application relates to an aspiration system to be used in surgery where high amounts of sterile fluids are circulated through the human body as for example orthopedic surgery.
2. Prior Art
Some orthopedic medical procedures produce particles or other debris that must be removed from the body. To remove such particles the surgeon may couple an aspiration tube to the surgical site. The aspiration tube, which pulls the debris from the body, is typically connected to a canister, which is connected to a suction tube connected to wall suction. An irrigation fluid is introduced to the body to continuously irrigate the surgical site. To insure that the surgical site is properly distended during surgery the amount of irrigation fluid must be higher than the amount of aspirated fluid at any given time. An infusion pump is typically required to offset the high flow created by the hospital vacuum line. Infusion pumps are relatively expensive and are not always available to the surgeon. Additionally, vacuum surges are created when the suction line is obstructed and irrigation fluid cannot flow quickly enough to offset the outflow created by the hospital vacuum line.
In addition, the hospital suction line produces a flow rate in excess of 2 liter/minute which leads to a high consumption of sterile fluid during the procedure.
It would be desirable to provide an aspiration system that would eliminate the need for an infusion pump. It would also be desirable to provide an aspiration system that would limit vacuum surges in the system and reduce the circulation of fluid through the human body.
There have been developed flow restrictors that are used in ophthalmic procedures. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,478,781 issued to Urich et al. discloses a coiled tube that can be used to minimize pressure surges in an ophthalmic aspiration system. The tube has a length of at least 8 feet and a number of coils that create a fluidic resistance which minimizes vacuum surges. The recited inner diameter of the tube ranges from 0.06 to 0.1 inches, which is industry standard. Although effective, the coiled approach can only account for a limited pressure drop. Additionally, the coil does not contain a filter and thus is susceptible to occlusions within the coiled tube.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,599,271 issued to Easley and assigned to Syntec, Inc. discloses an ophthalmic aspiration system that has a flow restrictor and an in-line filter. Likewise, STAAR Surgical of Monrovia, Calif. sells an in-line ophthalmic filter under the name CRUISE CONTROL that contains a flow restrictor. The flow restrictors limit the vacuum surges within the ophthalmic aspiration system. These filter systems are not acceptable for use in orthopedic procedures.
An orthopedic aspiration system that includes a filter assembly and a restrictive aspiration tube. The restrictive aspiration tube has an inner diameter between 0.05 and 0.30 inches.
Disclosed is an orthopedic aspiration system. The orthopedic aspiration system includes a filter assembly and a restrictive aspiration tube. The restrictive aspiration tube can be coupled to a vacuum source. The filter assembly filters out particles aspirated from a surgical site. The restrictive aspiration tube has an inner diameter between 0.05 and 0.3 inches and a length of at least 3 feet. These dimensions limit the flow rate that can be pulled through the aspiration system, while allowing for adequate vacuum necessary to aspirate from the surgical site.
Referring to the drawings more particularly by reference numbers,
The handpiece 12 may be connected to a console 20 of the system 10. The console 20 may provide driving signals to the handpiece 12. The console 20 may have input knobs or buttons 24 that allow the surgeon to vary different parameters of the system 10. The console 20 may also have a readout display 26 that provides an indication of the power level, etc. of the system 10.
The system 10 may include an irrigation tube 28 that can be coupled to the surgical site. The irrigation tube is connected to an irrigation source 30. The irrigation source 30 may be a gravity fed bottle that contains an irrigation fluid that flows into the body 16 through the irrigation tube 28. The irrigation source 30 may include a pump to provide a relatively high flow of irrigation fluid to the surgical site. The medical system 10 may further have an aspiration system 40 that aspirates the irrigation fluid and debris out of the body 16. The aspiration system 40 may include an upstream aspiration tube 42 that is coupled to the body 16 and a restrictive aspiration tube 44 that is connected to a vacuum source 46. A filter assembly 48 is connected to the aspiration tubes 42 and 44. By way of example, the vacuum source 46 may be a vacuum line of a hospital. Alternatively, the vacuum source may be a vacuum pump. The vacuum source 46 creates a negative pressure within the aspiration system 40 to induce a flow of irrigation fluid and debris out of the body 16. The vacuum source 46 is configured so that the flow rate through the irrigation tube 28 is slightly greater than the flow rate through the aspiration system 40.
The restrictive aspiration tube 44 has a relatively large fluidic resistance to create a large pressure drop and inertia in the aspiration system 40. The pressure drop reduces the free unobstructed flow and the large inertia minimizes instantaneous changes in the flow rate of the irrigation fluid flowing through the aspiration tube 44. Thus if the aspiration system 40 is opened the large fluidic resistance of the tube 44 will restrict the variation in the aspiration line and minimize vacuum surges.
The second aspiration tube 44 has an inner diameter between 0.05 and 0.30 inches and a length of at least 3 feet. It is desirable to create a fluidic resistance that causes a pressure drop approximately equal to the maximum pressure of the vacuum source. This will minimize the change in flow rate within the aspiration system in the event a maximum pressure occurs because of an occlusion.
The fluidic resistance of the restrictive aspiration tube 44 limits the vacuum pressure within the aspiration system 40. This vacuum limit may allow the irrigation source 30 to be a gravitation bag that does not require an infusion pump as found in the prior art. Eliminating the infusion pump reduces the complexity and cost of the system.
The filter housing 62 may have longitudinal grooves 66 as shown in
The filter mesh 72 may include a pair of ears 80 that create channels 82 between the mesh 72 and the filter housing 74. The channels 82 allow for fluid to flow even when particles are being captured by the filter mesh 72.
The orthopedic aspiration system 40 can filter particles and minimize vacuum surges without introducing complicated parts or increased cost to the system.
While certain exemplary embodiments have been described and shown in the accompanying drawings, it is to be understood that such embodiments are merely illustrative of and not restrictive on the broad invention, and that this invention not be limited to the specific constructions and arrangements shown and described, since various other modifications may occur to those ordinarily skilled in the art.
The present application claims priority to Provisional Application No. 60/641,471, filed on Jan. 4, 2005.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60641471 | Jan 2005 | US |