This application relates to aspirators for producing vacuum using the Venturi effect, more particularly to such aspirators having increased suction flow by increasing the perimeter of the inner passageway at the motive outlet end and the discharge inlet end for a maximum motive flow rate selected by a customer.
Engines, for example vehicle engines, are being downsized and boosted, which is reducing the available vacuum from the engine. This vacuum has many potential uses, including use by the vehicle brake booster.
One solution to this vacuum shortfall is to install a vacuum pump. Vacuum pumps, however, have a significant cost and weight penalty to the engine, their electric power consumption can require additional alternator capacity, and their inefficiency can hinder fuel economy improvement actions.
Another solution is aspirators that generate vacuum by creating an engine air flow path that is parallel to the throttle, referred to as an intake leak. This leak flow passes through a Venturi that generates a suction vacuum. The problem with the presently available aspirators is that they are limited in the amount of vacuum mass flow rate they can generate, and by the amount of engine air they consume, for example, aspirators having a circular cross-section at the motive outlet end and the discharge inlet end as shown in
A need exists for improved designs that generate increased vacuum pressure and increased suction mass flow rate while decreasing the consumption of engine air.
Aspirators are disclosed herein that generate increased vacuum pressure and increased suction mass flow rates while decreasing the consumption of engine air. Such aspirators include a body defining a Venturi gap between an outlet end of a converging motive section and an inlet end of a diverging discharge section. The converging motive section has an elliptical- or polygonal-shaped internal cross-section motive outlet and the diverging discharge section has an elliptical- or polygonal-shaped internal cross-section discharge inlet, and the converging motive section and the diverging discharge section, together, define an inner passageway formed by hyperboloid curves connecting a motive inlet to the elliptical or polygonal-shaped motive outlet or the elliptical or polygonal-shaped discharge inlet to a discharge outlet. In one embodiment, at least one of the motive inlet or the discharge outlet has a circular internal cross-section.
The aspirators may include a suction port defining a void in fluid communication with the Venturi gap. Here, a first portion of the body that defines the outlet end of the converging motive section and a second portion of the body that defines the inlet end of the diverging discharge section lay on the surface of the void and the void extends downward around the sides of both the first body portion and the second body portion. In one embodiment, the exterior profile of both the first portion and the second portion of the body generally match the internal cross-section of the inlet end and the outlet end, respectively.
In one aspect, the aspirators are constructed with the elliptical- or polygonal-shaped internal cross-section of the outlet end of the converging motive section having a ratio of the major axis to the minor axis of about 2 to about 4, and the elliptical- or polygonal-shaped internal cross-section of the inlet end of the diverging discharge section being offset, relative to the elliptical- or polygonal-shaped internal cross-section of the outlet end of the converging motive section, by the ratio of the difference of the discharge inlet area and the motive outlet area to the peak motive mass flow rate ((discharge inlet area−motive outlet area)/peak motive flow rate) times a constant, where the ratio is greater than 0.28.
In one embodiment, the Venturi gap is proportional to the (motive mass flow rate)n, wherein n is 0.25 to 0.8, and the offset between the motive outlet and the discharge inlet is proportional to the (motive mass flow rate)n, where n is 0.25 to 0.8, and the elliptical- or polygonal-shaped internal cross-section of the outlet end has an eccentricity of between 0 to, and including 1. In one embodiment, n for the Venturi gap and n for the offset may both be 0.4 to 0.6.
The following detailed description will illustrate the general principles of the invention, examples of which are additionally illustrated in the accompanying drawings. In the drawings, like reference numbers indicate identical or functionally similar elements.
As used herein “fluid” means any liquid, suspension, colloid, gas, plasma, or combinations thereof.
Check valve 111 is preferably arranged to prevent fluid from flowing from the suction port 110 to the application device 102. In one embodiment, the device requiring vacuum 102 is a vehicle brake boost device, positive crankcase ventilation (PCV) device, or fuel purge device. In another embodiment, the device requiring vacuum 102 is a hydraulic valve. The bypass port 114 may be connected to the device requiring vacuum 102 and, optionally, may include a check valve 120 in the fluid flow path 122 therebetween. Check valve 120 is preferably arranged to control the flow of fluid to or from the bypass port 114 to the application device 102.
Referring now to
When an aspirator, such as aspirator 100, is for use in a vehicle engine, the vehicle manufacturer typically selects the size of both the motive port 108 and aspirator outlet 112 based on the tubing/hose size available for connection of the aspirator to the engine or components thereof. Additionally, the vehicle manufacturer typically selects the maximum motive flow rate available for use in the aspirator, which in turn will dictate the area of the interior opening defined at the motive outlet end 132, i.e., the motive outlet 133. Accordingly, the vehicle manufacturer's selected parameters for the particular engine dictate the ratio of the motive outlet 133 to the aspirator outlet 112. Working within these constraints, the disclosed aspirators 100 significantly reduce the compromise between the desire to produce high suction flow rates at low (5 kPa to 30 kPa) source/discharge pressures and increased depth of vacuum at higher (30 kPa to 60 kPa) source discharge pressures. This reduction in the compromise is accomplished by changing the configuration for the motive outlet 133 and the discharge inlet 135 (defined by the discharge inlet end 134) to increase the perimeter of the inner passageway 104 at the motive outlet end 132 and the discharge inlet end 134, such as presented in
As illustrated in
To form the “T” shape of the aspirator 100 the suction port 110 has a central longitudinal axis C generally perpendicular to the body's central longitudinal axis B. The optional bypass port 114 may likewise have a central longitudinal axis D that is generally perpendicular to the body's central longitudinal axis B. As illustrated in
The suction port 110 includes a suction inlet 138 and a suction outlet, which is the discharge inlet 134, and similarly to the first tapering section 128, may gradually, continuously taper as a cone or according to a hyperbolic function along its length from the larger dimensioned suction inlet 138 to a smaller dimensioned suction outlet 134. The bypass port 114, when present, may also gradually, continuously taper as a cone or according to a hyperbolic function along its length, in particular from a smaller dimensioned end 162 to a larger dimensioned end 160. Depending upon the attachment of the aspirator into a system, the bypass port 114 may operate with the larger dimensioned end 160 as the inlet and the smaller dimensioned end 162 as the outlet or vice versa.
As best seen in
In aspirator 100, the flow of motive air through the first tapering portion 128 increases its speed, but creates low static pressure in the void 150. This low static pressure draws air from the suction port 110 into the Venturi gap 152 and into the discharge section 146 through the discharge inlet (suction outlet) 134.
The aspirator 100 may be operated to meet the following geometric ratios:
There are also performance ratios as follows:
To maximize the ratio F for the hyperbolical flow passageways disclosed herein, the ratio A′ should be between 3 and 12, and the ratio B′ should be greater than 4, and the ratio C′ should be greater than 4.
To maximize the ratio G for hyperbolical flow passageways, the ratio A′ should be between 3 and 12, and the ratio B′ should be greater than 4, and the ratio C′ should be greater than 4.
In the prior art of
In a desire to increase the flow rate of air from the suction port into the Venturi gap 152 of the aspirators disclosed herein, the area of the Venturi gap is increased by increasing the perimeter of the outlet end 132 and the inlet end 134 without increasing the overall inner dimension of the first tapering section 128 and the second tapering section 129 (preferably with no increase in the mass flow rate). In particular, motive outlet end 132 and discharge inlet end 134 are changed from being circular to being non-circular as described above. There are an infinite number of possible shapes that are not circular, each with a perimeter and a cross sectional area. These include polygons, or straight-line segments connected to each other, non-circular curves, and even fractal curves. To minimize cost a curve is simpler and easy to manufacture and inspect, and has a desirable perimeter length.
Additionally, as seen most clearly in
In any of the elliptical- or polygonal-shaped embodiments, the elliptical- or polygonal-shaped internal cross-section of the motive outlet end of the converging motive section has a ratio of the major axis to the minor axis of about 2 to about 4, and the elliptical- or polygonal-shaped internal cross-section of the inlet end of the diverging discharge section is offset, relative to the elliptical- or polygonal-shaped internal cross-section of the outlet end of the converging motive section, by the ratio of the difference of the discharge inlet area and the motive outlet area to the peak motive flow rate, which is then multiplied by a constant k1 to have a unitless ratio of greater than 0.28.
Offset ratio=(discharge inlet area−motive outlet area)/peak motive flow rate*k1 (V)
where k1 is:
k1=c at the motive outlet end*Dfluid at the motive outlet end; (VI)
and c is the speed of sound and Dfluid is the density of the fluid (typically air).
In any of the elliptical- or polygonal-shaped embodiments, the Venturi gap between the motive outlet end and the discharge inlet end has a gap ratio defined as the area of the Venturi gap divided by the motive flow times a constant k2 (to have a unitless ratio).
gap ratio=area of the Venturi gap/motive flow rate*k2 (VII)
where k2 is:
k2=c at the motive outlet end*Dfluid at the motive outlet end; (VIII)
and c and Dfluid are as defined above. Here, the gap ratio is greater than 4.7.
In one embodiment, the elliptical- or polygonal-shaped internal cross-section of the motive outlet end 132 has an eccentricity of between 0 to, and including 1. In another embodiment, the elliptical- or polygonal-shaped internal cross-section of the outlet end has an eccentricity of between about 0.4 to, and including about 0.97.
Referring again to
Area of an ellipse=π×A×B. (I)
The perimeter of an ellipse is not given by a simple exact equation. Instead a series equation provides an acceptable approximation;
Perimeter of an ellipse=π×(A+B)×(1+h2/4+h4/64+h6/256 . . . ) (II)
where h is:
Variable h=(A−B)/(A+B). (III)
We can further define a term, eccentricity, which is a term that relates the length of the two axes. It is defined as:
Variable e=(A2−B2)1/2/A. (IV)
Given a selected motive flow for the aspirator design being chosen to be equivalent for calculations where the radius of the prior art circular aspirator is 1 mm, the area is of 3.14 mm2 with a perimeter of 6.28 mm. The ratio of perimeter to area is mathematically equal to 2 for a circular internal cross-section for the motive outlet end and the discharge inlet end.
For an ellipse of a given eccentricity we can compute the area, perimeter and the ratio of perimeter to cross sectional area in the disclosed embodiments. If we limit the area to be equal to that of a circle of radius of 1 mm, the calculated results are as follows;
So, by changing the eccentricity, the perimeter can be increased while holding the cross sectional area fixed. This increase in perimeter provides the advantage of increasing the intersection area at the junction between the suction port, the motive cone, and the discharge cone, resulting in an increase in the suction port flow rate.
Referring now to
Changing from a circular cross section to a generally rectangular one with the same area results in an increase in the ratio of perimeter to area similarly to the elliptical profile described above. This increase in perimeter will again provide the advantage of increasing the intersection area between the Venturi gap and the suction port, resulting in an increase in suction port flow.
Another way to increase suction flow would be to lengthen the distance between the outlet end 132 of the motive cone 128 and the inlet end 134 of the discharge cone 129. As the motive flow travels through the Venturi gap it mixes with suction air. This combined flow has the effect of increasing the static pressure towards the discharge end of the Venturi. Lengthening this distance offers diminishing returns, and because the motive flow is largely unconstrained in the Venturi, offers the risk of turbulence and flow disturbance, which would reduce the velocity and increase static pressure. Accordingly, the increase in perimeter described above is preferred over lengthening the distance, but the two could be combined to avoid the diminishing returns.
The aspirators disclosed herein may be molded as a monolithic body. In one embodiment, the aspirators are formed by injection molding.
In one embodiment, the Venturi gap 152 is a lineal distance proportional to the (motive mass flow rate)n, wherein n is 0.25 to 0.8, and the offset between the motive outlet and the discharge inlet is also proportional to the (motive mass flow rate)n, where n is 0.25 to 0.8, and the elliptical- or polygonal-shaped internal cross-section of the outlet end has an eccentricity of between 0 to, and including 1, or more preferably between about 0.4 to, and including about 0.97. When the aspirator is included in a system having a device requiring higher amounts of vacuum, n for the Venturi gap and n for the offset may both be 0.4 to 0.6. In one embodiment, n for the Venturi gap and n for the offset are both 0.5 and the eccentricity is between about 0.4 to, and including 0.97.
In operation, for example when the aspirator is connected into an engine, engine air, i.e. filtered air, can be connected to enter the aspirator at the motive port. Air exiting the aspirator at the discharge port can be connected to the engine air at a point where the pressure is lower than that of the motive port. The motion of the air from the motive to discharge port draws the air down the motive cone, which can be a straight cone or a hyperbolic profile as described above. The reduction in area causes the velocity of the air to increase. Because this is an enclosed space the laws of fluid mechanics state that the static pressure must decrease when the fluid velocity increases. The minimum cross-sectional area of the motive cone abuts the Venturi gap. As air continues to travel to the discharge port it travels through the discharge cone, which is either a straight cone or a hyperbolic profile. Optionally, the discharge region can continue as a straight or hyperbolic profile cone until it joins the discharge port, or it can transition to a simple cylindrical or tapered passage. The minimum cross-sectional area end of the discharge cone is larger than that of the minimum cross section area end of the motive cone. The larger area is to provide area for the flow of air from the suction port. This change in area down the discharge cone slows the air velocity down again, with a subsequent increase in its static pressure.
The Venturi gap connects to the suction port, which exposes air in the suction port/passage to the same low static pressure that exists in the air passing at high velocity between the motive and discharge cones. The pressure created here can be lower than the pressure at the discharge port, which is known already to be lower than that at the motive port. This low pressure may be used for a variety of applications on a vehicle, such as for evacuating a vehicle brake boost canister, as is known to those skilled in the art. Under some circumstances, primarily when the gasoline engine is lightly loaded, the pressure at the discharge port is low enough to quickly lower the pressure at the application device. Since the area of the connection between the discharge cone or passage and the bypass passage is quite large relative to the connection between the suction passage and the Venturi gap, this optional connection can assist in evacuation of the application device initially.
For a comparison study a 3 gps aspirator having an elliptical motive outlet and an elliptical discharge inlet at the Venturi gap and a hyperboloid internal profile in the motive and discharge sections, (referred to as the “hyperboloid ellipse aspirator”) as illustrated in
Referring now to
One advantage of the aspirators disclosed herein is that a decreased amount of engine air is consumed/needed to generate the vacuum necessary to run a device requiring vacuum, which improves engine performance compared to that obtained with a vacuum pump or an aspirator with an internal circular profile.
Although the invention is shown and described with respect to certain embodiments, it is obvious that modifications will occur to those skilled in the art upon reading and understanding the specification, and the present invention includes all such modifications.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/791,561, filed Oct. 24, 2017, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/294,727, filed Jun. 3, 2014, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/833,746, filed Jun. 11, 2013.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1845969 | Hueber | Feb 1932 | A |
3234932 | Bird | Feb 1966 | A |
3754841 | Grabb | Aug 1973 | A |
4211200 | Rocchio | Jul 1980 | A |
4499034 | McAllister, Jr. | Feb 1985 | A |
4519423 | Ho | May 1985 | A |
4554786 | Takeuchi | Nov 1985 | A |
5108266 | Hewitt | Apr 1992 | A |
5188141 | Cook | Feb 1993 | A |
5291916 | Kloosterman | Mar 1994 | A |
5816446 | Steindorf | Oct 1998 | A |
6035881 | Emmerich | Mar 2000 | A |
7722132 | Carlsson | May 2010 | B2 |
9827963 | Fletcher | Nov 2017 | B2 |
10100720 | Fletcher | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10151283 | Graichen | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10239187 | Fletcher | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10273978 | Fletcher | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10316864 | Fletcher | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10336305 | Fletcher | Jul 2019 | B2 |
20060016477 | Zaparackas | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20080007113 | Choi | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080121480 | Kawamori | May 2008 | A1 |
20110132311 | Pursifull | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110186151 | Sparazynski | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20130213510 | Burnham | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130233276 | Pursifull | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130233287 | Leone | Sep 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190256070 A1 | Aug 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61833746 | Jun 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15791561 | Oct 2017 | US |
Child | 16403845 | US | |
Parent | 14294727 | Jun 2014 | US |
Child | 15791561 | US |