The present invention relates to immunoassays, in particular immunoassays for detecting and/or monitoring a cardiovascular disease in a patient, and monoclonal antibodies for use in said assays. The cardiovascular disease may in particular be heart failure, and especially heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. The immunoassay may be for assessing the likelihood of adverse outcomes of the cardiovascular disease.
The burden of heart failure (HF) has increased dramatically over the last several years1,2. Approximately half of HF is secondary to HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), which is anticipated to represent an even larger proportion of the total burden of HF as the population ages3. Despite multiple phase-III randomized controlled trials over the last few decades, a pharmacologic intervention proven to provide a clear benefit for this patient population remains to be identified.
The heterogeneity of the HFpEF syndrome has been identified as an important barrier to demonstrating the effectiveness of candidate pharmacologic interventions. Given the heterogenous nature of HFpEF, different degrees of contribution from various pathophysiological processes may unfavorably influence average responses to pharmacologic therapies tested in clinical trials. Therefore, the availability of simple, non-invasive biomarkers capable of readily identifying relevant underlying specific biologic processes that can be targeted with pharmacologic interventions represents a promising approach to enhance our clinical and therapeutic approach to HFpEF4.
The hetererogeneity of HFpEF also has important implications for the differential prognosis of individual patients. The ability to more effectively risk-stratify HFpEF patients is greatly needed. Novel risk-stratification markers may not only improve our ability to prognosticate HFpEF patients in clinical practice, but would be of great value to inform enrollment of high-risk individuals in future trials.
Myocardial fibrosis is thought to play a role in the pathophysiology of HFpEF5,6. Increased fibrosis results from an excess of formation relative to degradation of collagen, ultimately leading increased interstitial collagen deposition in the interstitium. Increased myocardial extracellular matrix deposition has been demonstrated in HFpEF in autopsy specimens and in vivo studies6-8 and has been shown to correlate with LV passive stiffening and diastolic dysfunction in this condition5,8. Myocardial fibrosis may also contribute to reduced coronary flow reserve6,9, ventricular dyssynchrony and a propensity to arrhythmia10,11. Given the role of myocardial fibrosis in HFpEF, simple fibrotic biomarkers that reflect the underlying dynamic process of fibrosis progression or regression of fibrosis would be highly valuable10.
The extracellular volume fraction (ECVF), an index of myocardial fibrosis measured by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, has been reported to predict adverse outcomes in patients with HFpEF 12,13, or at risk for HFpEF14. Although MRI will likely have an important role in the assessment of myocardial fibrosis in preclinical studies, early-phase research in humans and some clinical settings, its cost and availability are likely to limit or preclude its use in global phase-III trials and in clinical practice. In addition, many patients with HFpEF are not candidates for ECVF measurements due to claustrophobia or advanced renal disease. Thus, the search for circulating biomarkers of tissue fibrosis remains an area of great interest.
The search for suitable biomarkers for HFpEF is, however, complicated by the notion that “fibrosis is not just fibrosis”, and that ECM remodeling of different compartments and collagen types may have different biologic and prognostic implications15. For instance, differential associations of collagen neoepitope fragments and liver fibrosis has been reported in chronic hepatitis B vs. hepatitis C. Moreover, although myocardial fibrosis is thought to be important in HFpEF, extracardiac fibrosis may also play an important role. For example, fibrofatty infiltration of skeletal muscle has been reported in HFpEF16. Similarly, fibrosis may also occur in the arterial wall, the kidney and the liver dysfunction, all of which may contribute to adverse outcomes in this population.
Type XXVIII collagen is poorly described in literature but research entailing its physical role is slowly emerging. It is mainly located in peripheral nerves and dorsal root ganglia, but is also found in the skin17,18. Type XXVIII collagen is a beaded collagen that structurally resembles type VI collagen, with two von Willebrand factor A domains flanking a 528 amino acid collagenous domain19. Type XXVIII collagen was found in very low levels in healthy lung tissue but was overexpressed in bleomycin-induced lung injury20, which could indicate that cells expressing type XXVIII collagen might be involved in tissue repair processes. Type XXVIII collagen has also previously been seen to be upregulated in mouse hepatocarcinoma21.
The present inventors have now determined that collagen type XXVIII formation is upregulated in HFpEF, and have developed a new competitive ELISA utilizing monoclonal antibodies targeting the C-terminal end of type XXVIII collagen.
Accordingly, in a first aspect the present invention provides a method of immunoassay, the method comprising:
Said method can be used for quantifying peptides having said C-terminal epitope of type XVIII collagen in the biofluid sample, for example in order to assess levels of collagen type XXVIII formation.
In a preferred embodiment the method is a method of immunoassay for detecting and/or monitoring a cardiovascular disease in a patient and/or assessing the likelihood of or the severity of a cardiovascular disease in a patient. In said embodiment, the method comprises:
The immunoassay may be, but is not limited to, a competition assay or a sandwich assay. The immunoassay may, for example, be a radioimmunoassay or an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Such assays are techniques known to the person skilled in the art.
The cardiovascular disease may in certain embodiments be heart failure. In particular, the cardiovascular disease may be heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).
The method may in certain embodiments be a method for assessing the severity of a cardiovascular disease in a patient that comprises assessing the likelihood of patient mortality and/or hospitalization as a result of the cardiovascular disease and/or a composite of adverse cardiovascular events.
In certain embodiments, the patient may for example be a patient undergoing a therapy for the cardiovascular disease, and the method may comprise monitoring the cardiovascular disease in the patient.
The patient biofluid sample may be, but is not limited to, blood, serum, plasma, urine or a supernatant from cell or tissue cultures. Preferably the biofluid is serum or plasma, most preferably serum.
As used herein the term “monoclonal antibody” refers to both whole antibodies and to fragments thereof that retain the binding specificity of the whole antibody, such as for example a Fab fragment, F(ab′)2 fragment, single chain Fv fragment, or other such fragments known to those skilled in the art. As is well known, whole antibodies typically have a “Y-shaped” structure of two identical pairs of polypeptide chains, each pair made up of one “light” and one “heavy” chain. The N-terminal regions of each light chain and heavy chain contain the variable region, while the C-terminal portions of each of the heavy and light chains make up the constant region. The variable region comprises three complementarity determining regions (CDRs), which are primarily responsible for antigen recognition. The constant region allows the antibody to recruit cells and molecules of the immune system. Antibody fragments retaining binding specificity comprise at least the CDRs and sufficient parts of the rest of the variable region to retain said binding specificity.
In the methods of the present invention, a monoclonal antibody comprising any constant region known in the art can be used. Human constant light chains are classified as kappa and lambda light chains. Heavy constant chains are classified as mu, delta, gamma, alpha, or epsilon, and define the antibody’s isotype as IgM, IgD, IgG, IgA, and IgE, respectively. The IgG isotype has several subclasses, including, but not limited to IgGl, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4. The monoclonal antibody may preferably be of the IgG isotype, including any one of IgGl, IgG2, IgG3 or IgG4.
The CDR of an antibody can be determined using methods known in the art such as that described by Kabat et al. Antibodies can be generated from B cell clones as described in the examples. The isotype of the antibody can be determined by ELISA specific for human IgM, IgG or IgA isotype, or human IgG1, IgG2, IgG3 or IgG4 subclasses. The amino acid sequence of the antibodies generated can be determined using standard techniques. For example, RNA can be isolated from the cells, and used to generate cDNA by reverse transcription. The cDNA is then subjected to PCR using primers which amplify the heavy and light chains of the antibody. For example primers specific for the leader sequence for all VH (variable heavy chain) sequences can be used together with primers that bind to a sequence located in the constant region of the isotype which has been previously determined. The light chain can be amplified using primers which bind to the 3′ end of the Kappa or Lamda chain together with primers which anneal to the V kappa or V lambda leader sequence. The full length heavy and light chains can be generated and sequenced.
In some embodiments of the methods according to the first aspect of the invention, the biofluid sample is contacted with a monoclonal antibody which specifically binds to a C-terminus amino acid sequence QETCIQG (SEQ ID NO: 1) (also referred to herein as “PRO-C28”). Preferably said monoclonal antibody does not recognize or specifically bind to an elongated version of said C-terminus amino acid sequence which is QETCIQGA (SEQ ID NO: 2). Preferably said monoclonal antibody does not recognize or specifically bind to a truncated version of said C-terminus amino acid sequence which is QETCIQ (SEQ ID NO: 3).
Preferably, the ratio of the affinity of said antibody for the C-terminus amino acid sequence QETCIQG (SEQ ID NO: 1) to the affinity of said antibody for the elongated C-terminus amino acid sequence QETCIQGA (SEQ ID NO: 2) is at least 10 to 1, and more preferably is at least 50 to 1, at least 100 to 1, at least 500 to 1, at least 1,000 to 1, at least 10,000 to 1, at least 100,000 to 1, or at least 1,000,000 to 1.
Preferably, the ratio of the affinity of said antibody for the C-terminus amino acid sequence QETCIQG (SEQ ID NO: 1) to the affinity of said antibody for the truncated C-terminus amino acid sequence QETCIQ (SEQ ID NO: 3) is at least 10 to 1, and more preferably is at least 50 to 1, at least 100 to 1, at least 500 to 1, at least 1,000 to 1, at least 10,000 to 1, at least 100,000 to 1, or at least 1,000,000 to 1.
As used herein the term “C-terminus” refers to a C-terminal peptide sequence at the extremity of a polypeptide, i.e. at the C-terminal end of the polypeptide, and is not to be construed as meaning in the general direction thereof.
Monoclonal antibodies that specifically bind to the C-terminus amino acid sequence QETCIQG (SEQ ID NO: 1) can be generated via any suitable techniques known in the art. For example, the monoclonal antibody may be raised against a synthetic peptide having the amino acid sequence QETCIQG (SEQ ID NO: 1), such as for example by: immunizing a rodent (or other suitable mammal) with a synthetic peptide consisting of the sequence QETCIQG (SEQ ID NO: 1), which optionally may linked to an immunogenic carrier protein (such as keyhole limpet hemocyanin), isolating and cloning a single antibody producing cell, and assaying the resulting monoclonal antibodies to ensure that they have the desired specificity. An exemplary protocol for producing a monoclonal antibody that that specifically bind to the C-terminus amino acid sequence QETCIQG (SEQ ID NO: 1) is described infra.
In some embodiments of the methods according to the first aspect of the invention, the amount of binding of the monoclonal antibody specific for the C-terminal epitope of type XXVIII collagen is correlated with values associated with normal healthy subjects and/or with values associated with known disease severity and/or with values obtained from the patient at a previous point in time.
As used herein the term “values associated with normal healthy subjects and/or values associated with known disease severity” means standardised quantities determined by the method described supra for subjects considered to be healthy, i.e. without a cardiovascular disease, and/or standardised quantities determined by the method described supra for subjects known to have a cardiovascular disease with a known severity.
In some embodiments of the method according to the first aspect, the amount of binding of the monoclonal antibody specific for the C-terminal epitope of type XXVIII collagen is correlated with one or more predetermined cut-off values.
As used herein the “cut-off value” means an amount of binding that is determined statistically to be indicative of a high likelihood of cardiovascular disease in a patient, or of cardiovascular disease of a particular level of severity, in that a measured value of biomarker binding in a patient sample that is at or above the statistical cutoff value corresponds to at least a 70% probability, preferably at least an 80% probability, preferably at least an 85% probability, more preferably at least a 90% probability, and most preferably at least a 95% probability of the presence or likelihood of cardiovascular disease or of a particular level of severity of the disease.
The predetermined cut-off value for the amount of binding of the monoclonal antibody specific for the C-terminal epitope of type XXVIII collagen is preferably at least 100 ng/mL. In this regard, through the use of statistical analyses it has been found that a measured amount of binding of the monoclonal antibody specific for the C-terminal epitope of type XXVIII collagen of at least 100 ng/mL or greater may be determinative of cardiovascular disease. By having a statistical cut-off value of at least 100 ng/mL it is possible to utilise the method of the invention to give a diagnosis of cardiovascular disease with a high level of confidence. Applying such statistical cut-off values are particularly advantageous as it results in a standalone diagnostic assay; i.e. it removes the need for any direct comparisons with healthy individuals and/or patients with known disease severity in order to arrive at a diagnostic conclusion. This may also be particularly advantageous when utilising the assay to evaluate patients that already have medical signs or symptoms that are generally indicative of cardiovascular disease (e.g. as determined by a physical examination and/or consultation with a medical professional) as it may act as a quick and definitive tool for corroborating the initial diagnosis and thus potentially remove the need for more invasive procedures, and expedite the commencement of a suitable treatment regimen. It may also avoid the need for a lengthy hospital stay. In the particular case of cardiovascular disease, an expedited conclusive diagnosis may result in the disease being detected at an earlier stage, which may in turn improve overall chances of survival, and/or reduce the risk of hospitalisation.
In a second aspect the present invention provides an immunoassay kit comprising a monoclonal antibody that specifically binds to a C-terminus amino acid sequence QETCIQG (SEQ IDNO: 1), and at least one of:
The immunoassay kit is suitable for carrying out a method according to the first aspect, and accordingly preferred embodiments of the second aspect will be apparent from the above discussion of the preferred embodiments of the first aspect. For example, the kit is preferably for detecting and/or monitoring a cardiovascular disease in a patient and/or assessing the likelihood of or the severity of a cardiovascular disease in a patient. The monoclonal antibody that specifically binds to a C-terminus amino acid sequence QETCIQG (SEQ ID NO: 1) is preferably a monoclonal antibody that has been raised against a synthetic peptide having the amino acid sequence QETCIQG (SEQ ID NO: 1). Preferably said monoclonal antibody does not recognize or specifically bind to an elongated version of said C-terminus amino acid sequence which is QETCIQGA (SEQ ID NO: 2). Preferably said monoclonal antibody does not recognize or specifically bind to a truncated version of said C-terminus amino acid sequence which is QETCIQ (SEQ ID NO: 3).
In a third aspect, the present invention provides a monoclonal antibody that specifically binds to a C-terminus amino acid sequence QETCIQG (SEQ ID NO: 1). Preferred embodiments of the third aspect will be again be apparent from the above discussion of the preferred embodiments of the first aspect. For example, the monoclonal antibody is preferably a monoclonal antibody that has been raised against a synthetic peptide having the amino acid sequence QETCIQG (SEQ ID NO: 1). Preferably, the monoclonal antibody does not recognize or specifically bind to an elongated version of said C-terminus amino acid sequence which is QETCIQGA (SEQ ID NO: 2). Preferably, the monoclonal antibody does not recognize or specifically bind to a truncated version of said C-terminus amino acid sequence which is QETCIQ (SEQ ID NO: 3).
The presently disclosed embodiments are described in the following Examples, which are set forth to aid in the understanding of the disclosure, and should not be construed to limit in any way the scope of the disclosure as defined in the claims which follow thereafter. The following examples are put forth so as to provide those of ordinary skill in the art with a complete disclosure and description of how to make and use the described embodiments, and are not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure nor are they intended to represent that the experiments below are all or the only experiments performed. Efforts have been made to ensure accuracy with respect to numbers used (e.g. amounts, temperature, etc.) but some experimental errors and deviations should be accounted for. Unless indicated otherwise, parts are parts by weight, molecular weight is weight average molecular weight, temperature is in degrees Centigrade, and pressure is at or near atmospheric.
In the following examples, the following materials and methods were employed.
All reagents used for the experiments were high quality standards from companies such as Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) and Merck (Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA). The synthetic peptides used for immunization and assay development were purchased from the Genscript (New Jersey, USA). Human serum from healthy donors was purchased from a commercial supplier (Lee Biosolutions, MO 63043, USA). Human serum from HFpEF patients belonged to the TRAINING-HF cohort, obtained through an academic collaboration with the INCLIVA Health Research Institute in Valencia, Spain.
Monoclonal antibodies targeting the C-terminal end of collagen type XXVIII were generated by raising antibodies against the 7 amino acid sequence QETCIQG (SEQ ID NO: 1) (“PRO-C28”) found at the C-terminus of collagen type XXVIII. This 7 amino acid sequence was chosen rather than a longer sequence, such as the 10 amino acid C-terminus sequence KECQETCIQG (SEQ ID NO: 5), in order to reduce the number of cystein residues and so avoid the formation of a Cys-cys bridge in in the immunogenic peptide that was being used to generate the antibodies.
The protocol used for generation of monoclonal antibodies targeting PRO-C28 was as follows.
Immunization of 6-7 week old female Balb/C mice (weighing 14-18 g) was initiated by subcutaneous injection of 200 uL emulsified antigen solution comprising 100 ug immunogenic peptide (KLH-CGG-QETCIQG (SEQ ID NO: 6), where ‘KHL’ indicates keyhole limpet hemocyanin and CGG is a conjugation linker) in Stimune Immunogenic Adjuvant (SPECOL)(Cat #7925000, Invitrogen). The immunizations were repeated every 2nd week until stable serum antibody titer levels were reached. The mouse with the highest serum titer and best inhibition was selected for fusion and rested for at least three weeks following the last immunization. Subsequently, the mouse was boosted intravenously with 100 ug immunogenic peptide in 100 uL 0.9% NaCl solution three days before isolation of the spleen for cell fusion. To produce hybridoma cells, the mouse spleen cells were fused with SP2/0 myeloma cells as described by Gefter et al. The hybridoma cells were cloned in culture dishes using the semi-solid medium method. The clones were then plated into 96-well microtiter plates for further growth, and the limiting dilution method was applied to promote monoclonal growth. Indirect ELISA performed on streptavidin-coated plates was used for the screening of supernatant reactivity. Biotin-QETCIQG was used as the screening peptide, while the standard peptide (QETCIQG (SEQ ID NO: 1)) an elongated peptide (QETCIQGA (SEQ ID NO: 2)), a non-sense peptide (GLRPGSEYTV (SEQ ID NO: 7)) and a non-sense coater (GLRPGSEYTV-K-Biotin (SEQ ID NO: 8)) were used for further testing of the specificity of the clones. Supernatant was collected from the hybridoma cells, and purified using HiTrap affinity columns (GE Healthcare Life Science, Little Chalfront, Buckinghamshire, UK) according to manufacturer’s instructions. All animals were treated according to the guidelines for animal welfare.
he best antibody producing hybridomas were screened for reactivity towards the standard peptide (QETCIQG (SEQ ID NO: 1)) in the competitive ELISA described below, and the clone showing the most reactivity was selected for production of monoclonal antibodies targeting PRO-C28. Antibody specificity was tested using the standard peptide (QETCIQG (SEQ ID NO: 1)), elongated peptide (QETCIQGA (SEQ ID NO: 2)), non-sense peptide (GLRPGSEYTV (SEQ ID NO: 7)) and non-sense coater (GLRPGSEYTV-K-Biotin (SEQ ID NO: 8)). The isotype of the monoclonal antibody was determined using the Clonotyping System-HRP kit, cat. 5300-05 (Southern Biotech, Birmingham, AL, USA).
A 96-well streptavidin-coated ELISA plate from Roche, cat. 11940279, was coated with 100 µL/well of the biotinylated peptide Biotin-QETCIQG (SEQ ID NO: 4) dissolved in assay buffer (25 mM TBS-BTE + 2 g/l NaCl, pH 8), incubated for 30 min at 20° C. in the dark with shaking, and subsequently washed 5 times in washing buffer (20 mM Tris, 50 mM NaCl, pH 7.2). Thereafter 20 µl of peptide calibrator or sample were added to appropriate wells, followed by 100 µl of purified antibody solution (monoclonal antibodies specific for PRO-C28 dissolved in assay buffer), and incubated for 1 hour at 20° C. with shaking, followed by washing 5 times in washing buffer. Next, 100µL secondary antibody solution (horseradish peroxidase (HRP) labeled anti-mouse antibodies dissolved in the same assay buffer as used for the monoclonal antibody specific for PRO-C28) was added to each well, incubated for 1 hour at 20° C. with shaking, followed by washing 5 times in washing buffer. Finally, 100 µl tetramethylbenzinidine (TMB) (Kem-En-Tec cat.: 438OH) was added to each well, the plate was incubated for 15 min at 20° C. in the dark, and in order to stop the reaction 100 µl of stopping solution (1% H2SO4) was added and the plate was then analyzed in the ELISA reader at 450 nm with 650 nm as the reference (Molecular Devices, SpectraMax M, CA, USA). A calibration curve was plotted using a 4-parametric mathematical fit model.
A twofold dilution of human serum, human urine and EDTA, heparin or citrate treated human plasma samples (four of each type of sample) was used to assess the linearity. The linearity was calculated as a percentage of recovery of the undiluted sample.
The intra- and inter-assay variation was determined by 10 independent runs of five quality control (QC) and two kit controls run in double determinations.
Accuracy of the assay was measured in healthy human serum samples spiked with standard peptide, and calculated as the percentage recovery of serum in buffer.
Lower limit of measurement range (LLMR) and upper limit of measurement range (ULMR) was calculated based on the 10 individual standard curves from the intra-and inter-assay variation.
PRO-C28 was measured in serum samples in a cohort of patients with HFpEF (heart failure with preserved ejection fraction) and a cohort of healthy controls, using the PRO-C28 ELISA protocol described above. The patient demographics are shown in Table 1.
The best antibody producing hybridomas were screened for reactivity and selectivity towards the standard peptide, and based on reactivity the clone NBH218#65 8C11-2F10-1H7 was chosen and used for production of monoclonal antibodies targeting PRO-C28 for use the technical and biological evaluation of the PRO-C28 ELISA. The monoclonal antibodies were of the isotype: IgG2b, k. No reactivity was found towards the elongated peptide, non-sense peptide or non-sense coater (
A series of technical validations were performed to evaluate the PRO-C28 ELISA assay. A summary of the validation data is shown in Table 2.
PRO-C28 levels were measured, using the PRO-C28 ELISA, in serum samples in a cohort of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and in a cohort of healthy controls (HC). The levels of the biomarker in serum samples from the two cohorts were then compared, using Mann-Whitney test (non-paramteric data). The results are shown in
In addition, at three different time points over the course of the study, NT-proBNP levels were measured in the HFpEF patient serum samples, and the measured concentrations of NT-proBNP were then compared using a Spearman correlation with the measured concentrations of PRO-C28 (measured as discussed above) in the same sample. As shown below, in Table 3, it was found that the levels of PRO-C28 in the HFpEF cohort correlated significantly with NT-proBNP, which is the standard clinical assessment biomarker for diagnosing and monitoring HF.
In this specification, unless expressly otherwise indicated, the word ‘or’ is used in the sense of an operator that returns a true value when either or both of the stated conditions is met, as opposed to the operator ‘exclusive or’ which requires that only one of the conditions is met. The word ‘comprising’ is used in the sense of ‘including’ rather than in to mean ‘consisting of’. All prior teachings acknowledged above are hereby incorporated by reference. No acknowledgement of any prior published document herein should be taken to be an admission or representation that the teaching thereof was common general knowledge in Australia or elsewhere at the date hereof.
1. Lam CS, Donal E, Kraigher-Krainer E, Vasan RS. Epidemiology and clinical course of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Eur J Heart Fail 2011;13:18-28.
2. Lloyd-Jones DM, Hong Y, Labarthe D et al. Defining and setting national goals for cardiovascular health promotion and disease reduction: the American Heart Association’s strategic Impact Goal through 2020 and beyond. Circulation 2010;121:586-613.
3. Lam CS, Donal E, Kraigher-Krainer E, Vasan RS. Epidemiology and clinical course of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Eur J Heart Fail 2011;13:18-28.
4. Chirinos JA. Deep Phenotyping of Systemic Arterial Hemodynamics in HFpEF (Part 2): Clinical and Therapeutic Considerations. J Cardiovasc Transl Res 2017;10:261-274.
5. Rommel KP, von Roeder M, Latuscynski K et al. Extracellular Volume Fraction for Characterization of Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;67:1815-25.
6. Mohammed SF, Hussain S, Mirzoyev SA, Edwards WD, Maleszewski JJ, Redfield MM. Coronary microvascular rarefaction and myocardial fibrosis in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Circulation 2015;131:550-9.
7. Chirinos JA, Akers SR, Trieu L et al. Heart Failure, Left Ventricular Remodeling, and Circulating Nitric Oxide Metabolites. J Am Heart Assoc 2016;5.
8. Su MY, Lin LY, Tseng YH et al. CMR-verified diffuse myocardial fibrosis is associated with diastolic dysfunction in HFpEF. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2014;7:991-7.
9. Mohammed SF, Majure DT, Redfield MM. Zooming in on the Microvasculature in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction. Circ Heart Fail 2016;9.
10. Richards AM. Circulating Biomarkers of Cardiac Fibrosis: Do We Have Any and What Use Are They? Circ Heart Fail 2017;10.
11. Lin LY, Wu CK, Juang JM et al. Myocardial Regional Interstitial Fibrosis is Associated With Left Intra-Ventricular Dyssynchrony in Patients With Heart Failure: A Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Study. Sci Rep 2016;6:20711.
12. Duca F, Kammerlander AA, Zotter-Tufaro C et al. Interstitial Fibrosis, Functional Status, and Outcomes in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Insights From a Prospective Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2016;9.
13. Roy C, Slimani A, de Meester C et al. Associations and prognostic significance of diffuse myocardial fibrosis by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2018;20:55.
14. Schelbert EB, Fridman Y, Wong TC et al. Temporal Relation Between Myocardial Fibrosis and Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Association With Baseline Disease Severity and Subsequent Outcome. JAMA Cardiol 2017.
15. Nielsen MJ, Karsdal MA, Kazankov K et al. Fibrosis is not just fibrosis -basement membrane modelling and collagen metabolism differs between hepatitis B- and C-induced injury. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2016;44:1242-1252.
16. Haykowsky MJ, Kouba EJ, Brubaker PH, Nicklas BJ, Eggebeen J, Kitzman DW. Skeletal muscle composition and its relation to exercise intolerance in older patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction. Am J Cardiol 2014;113:1211-6.
17. Gebauer, J. M., Kobbe, B., Paulsson, M. & Wagener, R. Structure, evolution and expression of collagen XXVIII: Lessons from the zebrafish. Matrix Biol. 49, 106-119 (2016).
18. Veit, G. et al. Collagen XXVIII, a novel von Willebrand factor A domain-containing protein with many imperfections in the collagenous domain. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 3494-3504 (2006).
19. Annis, D. S., Mosher, D. F. & Roberts, D. D. NIH Public Access. 27, 339-351 (2009).
20. Schiller, H. B. et al. Time- and compartment-resolved proteome profiling of the extracellular niche in lung injury and repair. Mol. Syst. Biol. 11, 819-819 (2015).
21. Lai KKY, Shang S, Lohia N, Booth GC, Masse DJ, Fausto N, et al. (2011) Extracellular Matrix Dynamics in Hepatocarcinogenesis: a Comparative Proteomics Study of PDGFC Transgenic and Pten Null Mouse Models. PLoS Genet 7(6): e1002147. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002147
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1912856.0 | Sep 2019 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2020/074685 | 9/3/2020 | WO |