The present disclosure relates generally to an assemblage of containers, and particularly to an assemblage of containers containing reams of paper and supported by a shipping pallet.
Historically, the communications papers industry has used 47-inch×35½-inch (47×35½) block or stringer pallets as the primary shipping platforms for cut-size paper. The most common packaging configuration used by the paper industry is the 8.5″×11″ sheet size with 500 sheets per ream and 10 reams per carton with the reams configured in two 5-ream stacks side by side. The block or stringer pallet size accommodates an 8-carton layer footprint for product that fit almost perfectly to the pallet area dimensions with minimal under-hang or over-hang of the cartons relative to the pallet. The stability of the perfect cube of product on the pallet allows the 40 carton pallet configuration (5 layers of the 8 carton footprint) to be safely stacked 3 or 4 pallets high in warehouses and easily accommodated shipment in truck and rail cars with minimal load shifting and minimal bracing to prevent product damage during transit. Over the past 20 years as cut size paper sales migrated into retail distribution channels, these customers required the use of a different pallet size, the 48-inch×40-inch GMA (Grocery Manufacturers of America) design to fit in the standard rack stacking systems routinely used for storage of all products in this industry. For operational ease, in the paper industry the same identical standard carton footprints patterns used on the block and stringer pallets were simply transferred and used routinely on the GMA pallet. In the case of the most common product packaging configuration of cut size product (the 8.5″×11″, 10 ream carton), the standard 8-case layer pallet pattern configuration has usually been adopted. Because this pallet size is now larger than the footprint of the traditional 8-case layer pattern, it creates an under-hang situation of carton footprint relative to the pallet. When attempting to stack the pallets in storage without racks, the upper pallets are no longer supported to the edge of the pallet by the cartons in the lower pallet cube units, creating a less stable stacking unit. Also, during shipment the under-hang of the product on the pallet increases the opportunity for the product damage to occur due to carton shifting in the space that now exists between the carton unit blocks on the pallet, even when the pallets are touching in the load pattern.
To compensate for stacking instability and product damage, material handlers typically limit the heights at which the unit loads are stored to three unit loads per stack. However, in most cases the third unit load is pyramided, that is, it is positioned such that it straddles two side-by-side unit loads. By pyramiding, material handlers are able to store unit loads three high, but they lose ⅓ of a floor spot for every pyramided unit.
Also, to gain storage density and to make pyramiding more practical, material handlers must concentrate like SKUs in one area. This affects operational efficiency in that block storage limits the material handlers' ability to slot SKUs according to the velocity at which they flow in and out of the warehouse. This leads to longer travel distances, which in turn, adds cost by reducing efficiency and increasing truck maintenance and fuel costs.
Accordingly, there is a need in the art for palletizing a plurality of layers of containers containing reams of paper in a more ecologically friendly manner that is also suitable for stable long distance transportation and stable stacking at the destination point.
This background information is provided to reveal information believed by the applicant to be of possible relevance to the present invention. No admission is necessarily intended, nor should be construed, that any of the preceding information constitutes prior art against the present invention.
An embodiment of the invention includes an assemblage of containers having a plurality of layers of containers disposed on top of and supported by a transportable platform. Each container contains a plurality of reams of paper, where each layer of the plurality of layers has a same footprint area, and where the footprint area of each layer is equal to or greater than 99% of the platform footprint area.
An embodiment of the invention includes an assemblage of containers having a plurality of layers of containers. Each container contains a plurality of reams of paper, and each of the plurality of layers includes nine containers, three of the nine containers having their associated longitudinal axis oriented in a first direction, and six of the nine containers having their associated longitudinal axis oriented in a second direction orthogonal to the first direction.
Another embodiment of the invention includes a container for containing a plurality of reams of paper. The container includes a base tray, and a plurality of corner supports integrally formed with and coextensive with the base tray. The base tray and the plurality of corner supports form a plurality of open sides of the container that provide access to an interior of the container.
Referring to the exemplary drawings wherein like elements are numbered alike in the accompanying Figures:
Although the following detailed description contains many specifics for the purposes of illustration, anyone of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that many variations and alterations to the following details are within the scope of the invention. Accordingly, the following preferred embodiments of the invention are set forth without any loss of generality to, and without imposing limitations upon, the claimed invention.
An embodiment of the invention, as shown and described by the various figures and accompanying text, provides an assemblage of a plurality of layers of containers on a pallet, with each container containing a plurality of reams of paper, and with the outer footprint of the assemblage being disposed on the pallet so as to minimize the underhang of the assemblage on the pallet, thereby providing an assemblage of containers on a pallet having improved stability and transportability with respect to other prior art assemblages of containers containing reams of paper. While embodiments described herein depict a ream of paper made from paper sheets having specific nominal dimensions, such as 8.5-inches by 11-inches, for example, it will be appreciated that the scope of the disclosed invention is not so limited, and is also applicable to other paper sheets having other nominal dimensions, such as 11-inches by 17-inches, or A-size, for example, when used in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
The assemblage 100 is formed by layering a plurality of layers 115 of containers 105 on top of each other, with each container containing a plurality of reams of paper 120 (see
In an embodiment, the container 105 as illustrated in
Referring now to
With reference to
Referring now to
Referring now to
A comparison of the dimensions illustrated in
With reference to
In view of the foregoing, it will be appreciated that an embodiment includes a footprint of the plurality of layers of containers having an overall area Wc×Lc of 1,915.25 square-inches, which is 99.75% (greater than 99%) of the pallet footprint having an overall area Wp×Lp of 1,920 square-inches. Stated alternatively, and since Wc is greater than Wp by ¾ inches, it is also accurate to say that the footprint of the plurality of layers covers 97.9% (at least 97%) of the platform footprint area: (40×47)/(40×48)=97.9%.
Container 105 may be sized to hold reams of paper 120 made from paper sheets having specific nominal dimensions, such as 8.5-inches by 11-inches, for example. However, it will be appreciated that the disclosed invention is not so limited to just one paper size, and is also applicable to other paper sheets having other nominal dimensions, such as 11-inches by 17-inches, or A-size, for example, when used in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
As disclosed, some embodiments of the invention may include some of the following advantages: reduced customer transactions due to economy of shipping; reduced storage costs and square footage requirements (stack units 4-5 levels high); reduced storage and handling costs by eliminating 2-2-1 stacking with 3rd level pyramiding; reduced labor costs through improved handling efficiency (less put-away and retrieval trips); reduced pallet volume requirements and costs; reduced lift truck maintenance and fuel costs through reduced travel distances; and, reduced freight costs through improved trailer weight utilization.
While the invention has been described with reference to exemplary embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment disclosed as the best or only mode contemplated for carrying out this invention, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims. Also, in the drawings and the description, there have been disclosed exemplary embodiments of the invention and, although specific terms may have been employed, they are unless otherwise stated used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation, the scope of the invention therefore not being so limited. Moreover, the use of the terms first, second, etc. do not denote any order or importance, but rather the terms first, second, etc. are used to distinguish one element from another. Furthermore, the use of the terms a, an, etc. do not denote a limitation of quantity, but rather denote the presence of at least one of the referenced item.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/222,660, filed 2 Jul. 2009, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3055573 | Carter | Sep 1962 | A |
3985242 | Schlaeger | Oct 1976 | A |
3986611 | Dreher | Oct 1976 | A |
4036364 | Ambrose | Jul 1977 | A |
4068765 | Pulda | Jan 1978 | A |
4201138 | Cox | May 1980 | A |
4292901 | Cox | Oct 1981 | A |
4365710 | Swanson | Dec 1982 | A |
4793490 | Evert | Dec 1988 | A |
4852330 | Carangelo | Aug 1989 | A |
4913290 | de Groot | Apr 1990 | A |
5255841 | Ritter | Oct 1993 | A |
5314557 | Schwartz et al. | May 1994 | A |
5370233 | Schutz et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
D359180 | Bedney | Jun 1995 | S |
5630692 | Hanaya | May 1997 | A |
5647191 | Villemure | Jul 1997 | A |
5725089 | Ravet et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5749693 | Hanaya | May 1998 | A |
5844807 | Anderson et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5992735 | Oosterbaan | Nov 1999 | A |
6041570 | Descalzo | Mar 2000 | A |
6386824 | Pizzi et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6419090 | Focke et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
D479062 | Meyer | Sep 2003 | S |
7411602 | Stenzel et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7880907 | Sugimoto | Feb 2011 | B2 |
20030150764 | Bevier | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040051328 | Cinotti et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040124111 | Bevier | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050224731 | Hahn et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060249565 | Wood et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060272961 | Justice et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20090162181 | Ryf | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090288980 | Hadala | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100092268 | Hieronymus et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100307943 | Hieronymus et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10141964 | Mar 2003 | DE |
0799780 | Oct 1997 | EP |
0896945 | Feb 1999 | EP |
3111213 | May 1991 | JP |
6135511 | May 1994 | JP |
2008189369 | Aug 2008 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/604,021 mailed Nov. 9, 2011. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/604,021 Mailed May 10, 2012. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/604,021 Mailed Oct. 22, 2012. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/608,163 Mailed Oct. 11, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100089781 A1 | Apr 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61222660 | Jul 2009 | US |