To complete a well, often one or more formation zones adjacent a wellbore are perforated to allow fluid from the formation zones to flow into the well for production to the surface or to allow injection fluids to be applied into the formation zones. A perforating gun may be lowered into the wellbore and fired to create openings in a casing and to extend perforation tunnels into the surrounding formation zones.
Pressure in the wellbore can also be manipulated in relation to the formation zones to achieve removal of debris from perforation tunnels or to achieve enhanced fluid flow from the formation zones. The pressure manipulation includes creating a transient underbalance condition (when the wellbore pressure is lower than the formation pore pressure) prior or subsequent to detonation of a detonation cord or shaped charges of limited energy. Pressure manipulation also includes creating a transient overbalance condition (when the wellbore pressure is higher than the formation pore pressure) prior or subsequent to detonation or explosion of shaped charges of a perforating gun or a propellant. Creation of an underbalance condition can be accomplished in a number of different ways, such as by use of a low pressure chamber that is opened to create the transient underbalance condition, use of empty space in a perforating gun or tube to draw pressure into the gun right after firing, and use of other techniques. The underbalance condition results in a suction force that extracts debris out of the perforation tunnels, allowing formation fluid to flow more efficiently into the wellbore or injection fluids to flow more efficiently into the formation zones. Creation of an overbalance condition can be accomplished by use of a propellant (which when detonated causes high pressure gas buildup), use of a pressurized chamber, or use of other techniques. The overbalance condition can cause pressure to increase to a sufficiently high level to fracture the formation zones. Fracturing allows for better communication of formation fluids into the wellbore or better injection of fluids into the formation zones.
Before perforation and before subsequent manipulation of wellbore pressure, one or more packers or plugs can be positioned between the inside of the wellbore and the outside of the perforating gun or underbalance or overbalance device to isolate the interval over which the detonation, explosion, or actuation takes place to achieve a quicker and amplified response for the perforation or for the underbalance or overbalance condition.
This summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts that are further described below in the detailed description. This summary is not intended to identify key or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in limiting the scope of the claimed subject matter. In some examples, the present disclosure provides assemblies for minimizing damaging effects of pressure waves in a wellbore. The assemblies can comprise a dynamic device disposed in the wellbore and generating pressure waves in the wellbore. A barrier device disposed in the wellbore presents an obstacle to the pressure waves generated by the dynamic device. An occlusion disposed in the wellbore between the dynamic device and the barrier device reduces damaging effects of the pressure waves on the barrier device. In other examples, the present disclosure provides methods for minimizing damaging effects of pressure waves in a wellbore. The methods can comprise disposing an occlusion in the wellbore between a dynamic device and a barrier device, which presents an obstacle to the pressure waves generated by the dynamic device. The dynamic device is actuated and generates pressure waves. The occlusion absorbs and reduces damaging effects of the pressure waves on the barrier device.
Embodiments of assemblies and methods for minimizing pressure-wave damage are described with reference to the following figures. The same numbers are used throughout the figures to reference like features and components.
In the following description, certain terms have been used for brevity, clearness and understanding. No unnecessary limitations are to be inferred therefrom beyond the requirement of the prior art because such terms are used for descriptive purposes and are intended to be broadly construed. The different assemblies and methods described herein may be used alone or in conjunction with other assemblies and methods. It is to be expected that various equivalents, alternatives, and modifications are possible within the scope of the appended claims.
As used here, the terms “up” and “down”; “upper” and “lower”; “uppermost” and “lowermost”; “uphole” and “downhole”; “above” and “below” and other like terms indicating relative positions above or below a given point or element are used in this description to more clearly describe some embodiments of the disclosure. However, when applied to assemblies and methods for use in wells that are deviated or horizontal, such terms may refer to left to right, right to left, or other relationships as appropriate.
A tool string 28 is suspended by a carrier mechanism 30 that extends through the tubing 22. The carrier mechanism 30 can be a wireline, slickline, e-line, drillpipe, coiled tubing, and/or the like. The lower end of carrier mechanism 30 is secured to a head 32 which, in turn, can be connected to a casing collar locator 34, which confirms and/or correlates the depth of the tool string 28, and/or a firing head 36, which initiates detonation of shaped charges (not shown). Also disposed on the tool string 28 is a dynamic device 138 as well as one or more barrier devices 140, of which the structure and function will be described herein below. The tool string 28 further comprises connectors 37, which can be threaded or non-threaded unions or joints that connect components of the tool string 28, and a threaded end plug 44, which secures components on the tool string 28.
The dynamic device 138 is any type of device that can be actuated to achieve varying results, including but not limited to: (1) perforation of the surrounding casing 14 and cement 16; (2) creation of a dynamic underbalance condition within the wellbore 12; and/or (3) creation of a dynamic overbalance condition within the wellbore 12. Creating and controlling dynamic underbalance and overbalance conditions within a wellbore are further described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,284,612 and U.S. Patent Publication No. 2011/0132608, the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
Perforation is accomplished by lowering the dynamic device 138, in this case a perforating gun, through the wellbore 12 on the carrier mechanism 30 until it is positioned adjacent a formation zone 26. Shaped charges on the perforating gun are then ignited and generate sufficient force to penetrate the casing 14 and cement 16 and into the formation zone 26, resulting in perforation tunnels 24. Other types of dynamic devices 138 can be employed to achieve perforation, such as for example those that employ lasers, jets of abrasive fluid, bullets, and/or the like.
Creation of a dynamic underbalance condition can be accomplished in at least two ways: during perforation and/or with a dynamic underbalance device. A dynamic underbalance condition results during perforation if the pressure inside the perforating gun is lower than that within the wellbore 12, as wellbore fluids are drawn into the perforating gun to counteract such a pressure differential. Creation of a dynamic underbalance condition can also be accomplished with a dynamic device 138 such as a dynamic underbalance device, for example a hollow tube containing a low pressure gas, or a perforating gun that produces a pressure inside the carrier lower than the wellbore pressure. Other types of dynamic devices 138 can be used to create dynamic underbalance conditions.
Creation of a dynamic overbalance condition can be accomplished in at least two ways: during perforation and/or with a dynamic overbalance device. A dynamic overbalance condition results during perforation if the pressure inside the perforating gun is higher than that within the wellbore 12, as pressure from the perforating gun expands and fractures the formation zones 26. Creation of a dynamic overbalance condition can also be accomplished with a dynamic device 138 such as a dynamic overbalance device, for example a hollow tube containing a high pressure gas, a liquefied gas that vaporizes according to a change in pressure or temperature inside the wellbore 12, or a flammable propellant. Other types of dynamic devices 138 can be used to create dynamic overbalance conditions.
Actuation of the dynamic devices 138, such as by ignition of shaped charges during perforation and/or actuation of a dynamic underbalance or overbalance device, causes pressure differentials within the wellbore 12. This creates pressure waves that travel along the wellbore 12 and hit devices in the wellbore 12, such as devices on the tool string 28, including but not limited to packers or plugs. When the pressure waves hit such “barrier devices” 140, they produce large loads. Large loads can have a destructive effect on the tool string 28 because the actual forces on the tool string 28 can be much larger than the applied load of the pressure waves if the fundamental frequency of the tool string 28 is close to the leading frequency of the applied load produced by the pressure waves. The present inventors have found that such loads can be minimized by reducing the magnitude of the pressure waves and by extending the time it takes for the load to change direction. As explained further herein below, the present inventors have found that one or more occlusions 42, examples of which are described herein below, can be used to minimize such damaging effects on the tool string 28. Further, dynamic underbalance or overbalance conditions can be confined to localized areas of the wellbore 12 between such occlusions 42, which absorb and/or reflect the pressure waves.
In the following examples, for ease of description, the dynamic device 138 referred to will be a perforating gun 38 and the barrier device 140 referred to will be a packer 40. However, other dynamic devices 138 (such as for example the tubular dynamic underbalance or overbalance devices described above, and/or the like) and other barrier devices 140 (such as for example plugs and/or the like) could be provided on the tool string 28.
In the example shown, one solid centralizer 142 is placed between any two perforating guns 38, a plurality of solid centralizers 142 are placed both above and below the perforating guns 38, and a pup joint 46 is positioned between each of the solid centralizers 142 within the plurality. However, other configurations are possible. In this example, a first plurality of solid centralizers 142 are located uphole of the uppermost perforating gun 38 and a second plurality of solid centralizers 142 are located downhole of the lowermost perforating gun 38. The first plurality of solid centralizers 142 is equal in number to the second plurality of solid centralizers 142; in this example, three solid centralizers 142 are used both above and below the perforating guns 38. Placing approximately the same number of solid centralizers 142 both above and below the perforating guns 38 ensures that the pressure loss the solid centralizers 142 generate does not produce an uncompensated load that is transmitted along the tool string 28 that would otherwise be absorbed by the packers 40. Together, the solid centralizers 142 located uphole of the perforating guns 38 and the solid centralizers 142 located downhole of the perforating guns 38 absorb and reflect the pressure waves generated by the perforating guns 38 to minimize damaging effects on the packers 40.
Besides minimizing damaging effects on the packers 40, this arrangement also maintains or improves dynamic underbalance and overbalance conditions in localized areas around the perforating guns 38, because the solid centralizers 142 prevent wellbore fluid from freely flowing through the wellbore 12 in areas that are not targeted for such a dynamic underbalance or overbalance condition. This prevention of freely flowing fluid occurs because the outer diameter d of the solid centralizers 142 is close to the drift diameter of the wellbore 12.
In
The inflatable bladder 342 needs only to expand into and fill the wellbore 12; it does not need to provide a competent seal or to withstand any differential pressure other than that required to inflate it. The inflatable bladder 342 can be designed to burst at any point after filling the wellbore 12 or from the shock of a nearby underbalance or overbalance pressure condition. The inflatable bladder 342 can be made of, for example, platinum-based silicon products and/or the like. In the example shown in
In the uninflated state shown in
After inflation of the inflatable bladder 342, the perforating gun 38 can be triggered for perforation or to create a dynamic underbalance or overbalance condition. Pressure waves created by actuation of the perforating gun 38 will be absorbed and reflected by the inflatable bladders 342, one of which can be positioned on either side of the perforating gun 38 as shown in
Thus, referring to all the
Now with reference to
A method for minimizing damaging effects of pressure waves in a wellbore 12 comprises disposing an occlusion 42 in the wellbore 12 between a dynamic device 138 and a barrier device 140. In the example of
Although only a few example embodiments have been described in detail above, those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that many modifications are possible in the example embodiments without materially departing from this invention. Accordingly, all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of this disclosure as defined in the following claims. In the claims, means-plus-function clauses are intended to cover the structures described herein as performing the recited function and not only structural equivalents, but also equivalent structures. It is the express intention of the applicant not to invoke 35 U.S.C. §112, paragraph 6 for any limitations of any of the claims herein, except for those in which the claim expressly uses the words “means for” together with an associated function.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4372384 | Kinney | Feb 1983 | A |
5107927 | Whiteley et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5174379 | Whiteley et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5937947 | Holtby | Aug 1999 | A |
6793017 | Nguyen et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
7284612 | Ratanasirigulchai et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
20110132608 | Busaidy et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Johnson, Ashley B. and Walton I.C., “Perforating Shock and Jumping Processes”, Mar. 12, 2001, 13 pages, PFD01-02; Perforating Research, Schlumberger Reservoir Completions, U.S.A. |
Walton, Ian, “Shock Wave Impact on Perforating Guns”, Oct. 1998, 10 pages, PFD98-12; Perforating Research, Schlumberger, U.S.A. |
Carlos E. Baumann, Edison P. Bustillos, Juan P. Guerra, Awad William and Harvey A. Williams—SPE 143816—Reduction of Perforating Gunshock Loads, Society of Petroleum Engineers, presented at the Brazil Conference and Exhibition held in Macae, Brazil, Jun. 14-17, 2011, pp. 1-12. |
Adil Al Busaidy, Zouhir Zaouali, Carlos Erik Baumann, Enzo Vegliante—SPE144080—Controlled Wellbore Implosions Show that Not All Damage is Bad—A New Technique to Increase Production from Damaged Wells, Society of Petroleum Engineers, presented at SPE European Formation Damage Conference held in Noordwijk, The Netherlands, Jun. 7-10, 2011, pp. 1-11. |
Carlos Baumann, Harvey Williams, Timothy Korf and Robert Pourciau—SPE146809—Perforating High-Pressure Deepwater Wells in the Gulf of Mexico, Society of Petroleum Engineers, presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition held in Denver Colorado, U.S.A, Oct. 30-Nov. 2, 2011, pp. 1-12. |
Carlos E. Baumann, Harbey A. R. Williams, Awad William and Vincent Pequignot—IBP3359-10—Prediction and Verification of TCP and Wireline Perforating Gunshock Loads, Brazilian Petroleum, Gas and Biofuels Institute—IBP—presented at the Rio Oil & Gas Expo and Conference 2010, held on Sep. 13-16, 2010 in Rio de Janeiro, pp. 1-10. |
William Sanders, Carlos Baumann, Harvey Williams, Flavio Dias De Moraes, Jonathan Shipley, Martin Bethke and Scott Ogier—OTC21758—Efficient Perforation of High-Pressure Deepwater Wells, Offshore Technology Conference, presented at the Offshore Technology Conference held in Houston, Texas, USA, May 2-5, 2011, pp. 1-10. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130140023 A1 | Jun 2013 | US |