This application relates generally to the drainage of fluid from the body during the wound healing process, e.g., following surgery, trauma, or placement of implants or surgical devices.
During surgery, or as a result of trauma, subcutaneous tissue can be removed or altered, and an open void or dead space or cavity is created within the tissue that was previously attached to other tissue. This may also occur inside the chest or abdominal cavity. The very small blood and lymphatic vessels that previously ran from the underlying tissue (i.e., muscle, connective tissue) to the overlying tissue (i.e., skin, muscle) can be cut or damaged. When this occurs, the natural process of wound healing is triggered.
The process of wound healing is well known. When an initial incision is made at the beginning of a surgical procedure, or following a traumatic wound, the body conveys blood, blood products, and proteins into the cavity or void or operative dead space that is formed. A wound exudate begins to form. This initiates the first stages of wound healing.
The production of wound exudate occurs as a result of vasodilation during the early inflammatory stage of wound healing. It occurs under the influence of inflammatory mediators, such as histamine and bradykinin. Wound exudate presents itself as serous fluid in the wound bed.
Wound exudate is part of normal wound healing in acute wounds. Wound exudate contains proteins and cells that are vital to both initiate and propagate the healing process. The constituents of wound exudate include, inter alia, (i) fibrin (function: clotting); (ii) platelets (function: clotting); (iii) other cellular elements, e.g., red blood cells and white blood cells including, lymphocytes, neutrophils and macrophages; and (iv) wound debris/dead cells.
The blood cells, blood products, and proteins within the wound void or cavity initiate the coagulation cascade. The blood inside the void or operative dead space mixes with the proteins and begins to form clot. Fibrin forms from fibrinogen, and the process of clotting and wound healing is initiated. The coagulation cascade begins immediately after incision or injury, and typically continues until about the fifth to seventh day of wound healing. The end result of the coagulation cascade is the formation of thrombus and clot. It is this natural clotting process that avoids exsanguination, else the person would bleed to death.
Thus, as part of the normal wound healing process, it is to be expected that fluid collecting in the wound void will include wound exudate, blood cells, blood products, blood clots, thrombus, wound debris, dead cells, and other byproducts of wound healing. The larger the operative dead space, the greater is the potential for internal fluid collection.
Due to the progression of the wound healing process, it is well known that the constituency of the fluid within the operative space changes over time. In the early stages of wound healing, as the byproducts of wound healing form, the fluid is bloody and viscous. Only after wound healing progresses, and the coagulation cascade advances to repair the injury, does the fluid in the wound void turn less bloody and viscous, into a straw-colored serum. Anyone having surgery where a drain is placed has experienced the fluid changing from a thick bloody drainage to a more clear yellow or serous color.
A person who is in good health, or has minimal skin undermining or has otherwise undergone a minor procedure, can resolve the accumulation of fluid within a wound void over time. However, the body still has fluid that collects in the open space. This open space needs to fill with the exudates, which facilitates closure of the dead space, approximation of the tissues, and normal healing. Wound healing also needs to be accompanied by an absence of continued irritation, so that there is not a continuous initiation of new wound healing.
Currently, to aid the evacuation of fluid from the wound, conventional wound drains are placed at the end of a surgical procedure.
There is a recognized problem with conventional wound drain technology, which is directly related to the nature of the wound healing process itself. Effective wound drainage necessarily requires the ability to clear the byproducts of the wound healing process, as described, such as wound exudate, blood cells, blood products, blood clots, thrombus, wound debris, dead cells and other viscous materials. However, experience demonstrates that these naturally occurring byproducts of wound healing plug conventional wound drains. As a result, current wound drain technology is not effective at adequately clearing wound voids. Concurrently, current drains are ineffective at formally closing down larger dead spaces, and can only manage small amounts of fluid directly around the drain itself. Fluid can quickly overwhelm the space and collect to large volumes, creating a seroma and preventing the tissue surfaces from approximating and healing. Finally, conventional wound drains provide non-uniform blood and fluid removal with low inconsistent suction pressure, often with long drain duration and the potential of infection. The wound void is not closed down, and seroma formation remains high and persistent.
As a result, seromas commonly develop following drain removal or when fluid is produced at a greater rate than can be absorbed. Conventional wound management techniques are commonly applied when a seroma becomes a clinical concern. Placement of a seroma catheter or additional drain, as well as repeated or serial drainage of a seroma, may be required, which involved recurrent, serial punctures often over two to three weeks, until the seroma cavity is closed or is no longer a clinical problem.
Another option is to place a “Seroma Cath”™. A clinically accepted way to deal with a seroma that does not appear to be resolving on its own, is to replace a new surgical that continuously drains the space system, coupled with treatment with antibiotics to prevent infection while the current drain system is in use. There are currently numerous types of wound drains on the market, most of them utilizing some form of tubing to withdraw fluid from the wound until the body can resorb the fluid without assistance. A continuous drain system allows the fluid to continuously escape until the body can complete the healing process on its own.
A representative prior art continuous drain system can comprise an implanted device such as a piece of rubber tubing (Blake Drain) (as shown in
Another representative prior art continuous drain system, which is currently approved for external use only, can take the form of an externally applied device comprising a piece of foam with an open-cell structure, which coupled to one end of a plastic tube (see
Current wound drain devices assemblies at times do not remove a substantial amount of fluid from within a wound and have other performance issues. For example, external VAC devices clear fluid directly around external wounds (as
Furthermore, the clinical use of external VAC devices may not make wound drainage more cost-effective, clinician-friendly, and patient-friendly.
For example, the foam structures and adhesive membranes associated with conventional practices of external VAC need to be periodically removed and replaced. Currently, dressing changes are recommended every 48 hours for adults with non-infected wounds, and daily for infants and adolescents. Current techniques place the foam material in direct contact with granulating tissue. Removal of the foam structures in the presence of granulating tissue and the force of pressure on the wound bed that this removal can cause pain or discomfort. The foam sponge can also de-particulate and remain in the wound. Furthermore, the multiple steps of the conventional external VAC procedure—removing the adhesive membrane, then removing the old foam structures, then inserting the new foam structures, and then reapplying the adhesive member along the entire periphery of the wound—are exacting, tedious and time consuming. They only prolong pain or discomfort, and cause further disruption to the patient, and also demand dedicated nursing time and resources.
Furthermore, to function correctly, the adhesive membrane applied over the foam wound structures must form an airtight seal with the skin. Obtaining such a seal can be difficult, particularly in body regions where the surrounding skin is tortuous, and/or mucosal and/or moist.
Furthermore, prolonged wearing of wet dressings can cause further breakdown and maceration of the surrounding skin thereby increasing the wound size. This can cause further discomfort to the patient, and the exudate can often be offensive in odor and color causing further morbidity to the patient. This may, in turn, require more numerous dressing changes and re-padding throughout the day, which is disruptive to the patient and costly both in terms of nursing time and resources.
Furthermore, since the membrane and the material of the foam structures are both in direct contact with tissue, tissue reactions can occur.
A seroma or fluid collection in closed interior wounds is by far the most common complication in surgery today. Such complications result in a significant amount of lost income to patients, as well as expenses to insurers and physicians who have to care for these patients that require serial drainage. Such complications also delay wound healing, may entail additional surgical procedures, and ultimately delay the patient's return to work and routine functional activity. Seroma management can also be costly and, further, can place health care workers to additional needle exposure risks and related outcomes such as hepatitis, etc. Concurrently, there are millions of dollars being spent on developing internal glues to try to get internal tissues, separated by surgery, to adhere back together following surgery.
The inability to prevent or treatment seromas that form in closed interior wounds is a problem that has persisted in the field of elective surgery since the beginning of surgery, and has been documented in the surgical literature for all specialties over the last fifty years. Seromas and abnormal fluid collection are so common, that physicians and surgeons will acknowledge that seromas are, unfortunately, an expected part of wound healing following surgery.
However, it does not have to be this way.
The invention provides a solution to the persistent, unsolved clinical problem of seromas, and, beyond that, makes it possible to actually close down a dead space or surgical wound, to approximate tissues so that a seroma cannot form, thereby accomplishing what current wound drains fail to do.
The invention provides assemblies, systems, and methods for draining a wound that is created by surgery or trauma. The wound is defined by an interior dead space having a volume enclosed between interior tissue surfaces consisting of muscle, connective, or skin tissue containing blood vessels that have been separated by surgery or trauma within a body beneath substantially intact skin. As part of the natural wound healing process, extracellular exudates comprising blood, serous fluid, and byproducts of wound healing including blood clots can accumulate during wound healing. The invention provides assemblies, systems, and methods that do not only manage blood and fluid collection of the extracellular exudates in the interior dead space, but also serve to close and eliminate the dead interior space itself, by drawing the separated interior tissue surfaces together to promote adherence of the tissue surfaces and a normal wound healing process.
One aspect of the invention provides a wound drain assembly and associated systems and methods comprising at least one housing that is sized and configured for placement substantially entirely within the interior dead space. The housing encloses an open interior. The wound drain assembly also includes perforations in the housing communicating with the open interior. The perforations are sized and configured to pass the extracellular exudates without substantial plugging. The wound drain assembly further includes tubing coupled to the open interior and extending outside the interior dead space. The tubing is sized and configured to be coupled to a source of negative pressure outside the interior dead space. The wound drain assembly also includes an open cell component, e.g., gauze or open cell material or sponge foam material, carried within the open interior to take in (e.g., by adsorption and/or absorption) extracellular exudates passed into the housing through the perforations, and to transmit the extracellular exudates into the tubing for discharge. The wound drain assembly may comprise a nonabsorbable construct, or may comprise a material that is absorbed over time by the body, or combinations thereof.
In one embodiment, the perforations comprise slits or slots that emulate a one-way valve. The emulated one-way valve is normally substantially closed in the absence of applied negative pressure. When substantially closed, tissue in-growth through the perforation is prevented. The emulated one-way valve is opened in response to applied negative pressure to pass the extracellular exudates without substantial plugging. In one arrangement, the perforations in the housing comprise at least one “x”-shaped slit. In one arrangement, the perforations in the housing comprise at least one semilunar-shaped slot. Other geometric flap designs may be used.
In one embodiment, the perforations comprise a mean pore diameter of about 0.5 mm to about 5 mm to pass the extracellular exudates without substantial plugging.
In one embodiment, the housing, the perforations, and open cell component are mutually sized and configured, while the extracellular exudates taken in by the open cell material are conveyed in response to the negative pressure from the wound, to draw together the separated interior tissue surfaces, thereby promoting adherence of the tissue surfaces and a normal wound healing process, effectively closing the operative dead space.
Another aspect of the invention provides a system that includes a wound drain assembly. The wound drain assembly comprises a housing enclosing an open interior. The housing is sized and configured for placement within an interior wound site or body cavity. Perforations in the housing communicate with the open interior, and an open cell component is carried within the open interior to take in fluid in the interior wound site or body cavity. Tubing is coupled to the open interior and extends outside the interior wound site or body cavity. The tubing is sized and configured to be coupled to a source of negative pressure outside the body cavity to convey fluid taken in by the open cell component from the internal wound site or body cavity. The system further includes a tubular sleeve including a tissue penetrating distal tip for accessing the interior wound site or body cavity and an interior bore sized and configured to accommodate passage of the wound drain assembly into the accessed interior wound site or body cavity.
Another aspect of the invention provides families of wound drains, each family comprising at least one wound drain assembly. Within each family, the wound drain assembly/assemblies possess dimension(s) sized and configured to fit the particular morphology of an interior dead space created by a particular application or surgical procedure. For example, one family of wound drain assemblies can be provided specially sized and configured for conveying extracellular exudates from an interior dead space resulting from procedures creating larger wound voids, typically but not confined to reconstructive surgery, orthopedic surgery, or procedures like tummy tucks or abdominoplasty. On the other hand, another family of wound drain assemblies can be provided specially sized and configured for conveying extracellular exudates from an interior dead space resulting from procedures created smaller wound voids such as hernia surgery, pediatric surgery, neurosurgery, or cosmetic surgery. Within each family, the wound drain assemblies include housings that enclose an open cell component and that are perforated for conveying extracellular exudates from the particular interior dead space, without substantial plugging, in response to the application of negative pressure. The housings and open cell components may be of different dimensions to account for the various surgical applications.
Another aspect of the invention provides a wound drain assembly and associated systems and methods in which there are at least two housings in fluid communication in a serial, spaced apart relationship. The housings enclose an open call component and are perforated for conveying extracellular exudates from an interior dead space, without substantial plugging, in response to the application of negative pressure. In use, a serial (i.e., in-line) internal drain system can be placed, depending upon the morphology of a given wound void, along the axis of a longitudinally elongated wound void (e.g., as a result of spinal fusion surgery), or from front to back within a wound void that extends at least partially in anterior and posterior, or circumferential, aspects (e.g., as a result of abdominoplasty or total joint replacement surgery or spinal surgery where an elongated, serial device would be beneficial or where two or more drains would typically be required), or a wound site that requires, e.g., drainage both inside and outside the abdomen.
Another aspect of the invention provides a wound drain assembly and associated systems and methods in which there are at least two housings in fluid communication in a parallel relationship. The housings enclose an open cell component and are perforated for conveying extracellular exudates from an interior dead space, without substantial plugging, in response to the application of negative pressure. In use, the parallel (i.e., branched) internal drain system can be placed from front to back within a wound void that extends at least partially in anterior and posterior, or circumferential, aspects (e.g., as a result of abdominoplasty or total joint replacement surgery), or a wound site that requires, e.g., drainage both inside and outside the abdomen.
Another aspect of the invention provides a wound drain assembly comprising a wound drainage structure comprising a material capable of being absorbed by the body and being sized and configured to take in fluid in an interior wound site or body cavity. The assembly includes tubing coupled to the wound drainage structure and extending outside the interior wound site or body cavity. The tubing is sized and configured to be coupled to a source of negative pressure outside the body cavity to convey fluid taken in by the material from the internal wound site or body cavity. In one embodiment, the absorbable wound draining structure is sized and configured, while the fluid taken in by the material is conveyed in response to the negative pressure from the wound, to draw together separated interior tissue surfaces, thereby promoting adherence of the tissue surfaces and a normal wound healing process, effectively closing the interior wound site or body cavity.
Another aspect of the invention provides system comprising an absorbable wound drain assembly. The system includes a tubular sleeve including a tissue penetrating distal tip for accessing the interior wound site or body cavity and an interior bore sized and configured to accommodate passage of the wound drain assembly into the accessed interior wound site or body cavity.
The assemblies, systems, and/or methods that embody the technical features of the invention apply a vacuum of significant negative pressure internally and directly in a wound void or body cavity for enhanced wound healing benefits. By applying a vacuum of significant consistent negative pressure internally and directly in the wound void or body cavity, the assemblies, systems, and/or methods reduce the “dead-space” or open area inside the wound or cavity. The assemblies, systems, and/or methods increase the nature and extent of wound drainage, promote tissue adherence, facilitate closure of wounds, and thus decrease seroma formation and promote primary wound healing. The assemblies, systems, and/or methods thereby decrease the costly and increased patient morbidity caused by seroma formation and the resultant delay in primary wound healing or need for additional surgical procedures or drainage.
Although the disclosure hereof is detailed and exact to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention, the physical embodiments herein disclosed merely exemplify the invention that may be embodied in other specific structure. While the preferred embodiment has been described, the details may be changed without departing from the invention, which is defined by the claims.
As shown in
As will be described in greater detail later (see also
The housing 18 may be impregnated or coated with bioactive agents, such as silver, antibiotics, antibacterials, or growth factors, which may decrease infection and promote wound healing. The housing 18 may also include other hormone or natural or manmade stimulating factors that can decrease the chance of infection and/or accelerate wound healing. The housing 18 can also be impregnated or coated with a bioactive agent such as methotrexate.
The housing 18 is formed to include a hollow interior chamber 28, which is enclosed by the side and end walls of the housing 18. The interior chamber 28 encloses an open cell component 16. The open cell component 16 is characterized in that it does not particulate in the presence of fluid and pressure, and that it takes in, e.g., by adsorption and/or absorption) the extracellular exudates found in an interior, surgically created dead space. The open cell structure can comprise, e.g., gauze, or a foam sponge material comprising, e.g., an open-cell porous structure (see
The open cell component 16 is desirably compressible for easy insertion into and removal from the housing 18 for replacement. The configuration of the housing 18 can also provide a contour that facilitates sliding of the internal drain assembly 12, easing removal from the body.
The open cell component 16 may also be impregnated with bioactive agents such as silver, or antibiotics, or antibacterials, or growth factors, which may decrease infection and promote wound healing. The open cell component may also include other hormone or natural or manmade stimulating growth factors that can decrease the chance of infection and/or accelerate wound healing. For wound drains installed following cancer surgery, the open cell component 16 can also be impregnated or coated with a bioactive agent such as methotrexate or other chemotherapeutic agents.
In this arrangement, the housing 18 is also formed to include one or more through-slots, through-apertures, or through-perforations 20 in the side and/or end walls of the housing 18. The through-slots, through-holes, or through-perforations 20 open the hollow interior chamber 28 to communication with the wound site environment outside the housing 18. The open cell component 16 communicates with the wound void W through the through-slots, through-apertures, or through-perforations 20 that perforate the housing 18.
The through-slots, through-apertures, or through-perforations 20 perforating the housing 18 are sized and configured to pass, without substantial plugging, the extracellular exudates comprising serous fluid, wound exudate, blood cells, blood products, blood clots, thrombus, wound debris, dead cells and other viscous materials, which can be expected to reside in the wound void W. In a representative embodiment, the through-slots, through-apertures, or through-perforations 20 are sized and configured to present a mean pore diameter of between about 0.5 mm to about 5 mm. Other desirable sizes and configurations for the apertures 20 will be described in greater detail later.
The materials conveyed through the through-slots, through-apertures, or through-perforations 20 into the open interior are taken in (e.g., by adsorption and/or absorption) by the open cell material 18.
As before described, the housing 18 comprises a non-tissue adherent covering for the open cell component 16. This allows easy removal of the internal drain assembly 12, because there is no departiculation or adherence of the open cell component 16 to the surrounding soft tissues. Due to the enclosure of the open cell component 16 within the non-tissue adherent housing 18, there is also no bleeding upon removal of the internal drain assembly 12, because there is no sticking adherence of the internal drain assembly 12 to the soft tissues internally.
An end of a drain tubing 14 is coupled to the housing 18 and opens into the hollow interior chamber 28.
The drain tubing 14 is desirably flexible and made of medical grade, inert material. e.g., silicone rubber, polyurethane, or other biocompatible plastics. The tubing 14 is desirably sized and configured to accommodate sufficient fluid flow with a relatively small and tolerable incision size (e.g., about 2-3″ in diameter).
The drain tubing 14 extends outside the wound void W. The drain tubing 14 can extend through a percutaneous incision in the skin overlying any wound void W. Alternatively, the drain tubing 14 can extend through an opening in a skin flap bounding the wound void. The flexible drain tubing 14 includes a terminal end 22 that extends outside the body.
The terminal end 22 desirably includes a quick release connector 24. The connector 24 is sized and configured to be connected to a conventional external negative pressure suction device 26 (such as a V.A.C.® device made by KCI International, or a conventional wall suction or other regulated vacuum device).
In use (as
The drain tubing 14 desirably includes an inline reservoir 30 to collect the withdrawn extracellular exudates comprising serous fluid, wound exudate, blood cells, blood products, blood clots, thrombus, wound debris, dead cells and other viscous byproducts of the wound healing process for disposal.
As
The internal drain assembly 12 makes possible the placement of the perforated, non-tissue adherent housing 18 enclosing the large surface area of the open cell component 16 entirely within the interior wound void or dead space, with the drain tubing 14 extending from the interior wound void or dead space through a percutaneous access to a location outside the body, as
The negative pressure can be, e.g., 75 mmHg to 200 mmHg, and is desirably about 125 mmHg below ambient pressure, although the negative pressure may fall slightly above that range and may also decrease below that range over time. The amount of negative vacuum pressure can be regulated in a continuous, discontinuous, or otherwise variable manner, to maximize wound healing and closure. In this way, the system 10 promotes primary wound healing while also decreasing or minimizing seroma formation. The pressure required to keep the tissues approximated may also decrease over time and fall to the negative 20 mmHg to 100 mmHg range.
As
As
As
A further representative embodiment is shown in
As shown in
For example, as shown in
Another representative emulation of a one way valve is shown in
By way of example, the pore size can range between 0.5 mm to 5 mm, and the separation between pores can be, e.g. about 8 mm, although the magnitudes can vary upward or downward.
As before described, the internal drain assembly 12 as described can be inserted through relatively small and tolerable percutaneous incision size (e.g., about 2-3″ in diameter).
Furthermore, as shown in
In a representative embodiment, the bore 40 of the cannula 28 comprises an interior diameter of, e.g., 4.5 mm, and the housing 18 of the internal drain assembly is sized and configured (e.g., outside diameter of about 3 mm) for insertion thorough the proximal end of cannula 38 and advancement though the bore 40 (see
The housing 18 is pushed distally (i.e., advanced axially), until the housing 18 rests at distal tip 42 of cannula 38. The cannula 38 is withdrawn (retracted) while holding internal drain assembly 12 stationary (see
The housing 18 can be formed in different dimensions, shapes, and sizes, and the open cell component 16 cut to corresponding dimensions, shapes, and sizes, to create different families of wound drains sized and configured to meet the particular requirements of a given surgical procedure or class of surgical procedures.
For example, as shown in
As another example, as shown in
Another representative embodiment is shown in
Another representative embodiment is shown in
Any given wound drainage system 10, 48, 50 can be variously configured and assembled. For example, as shown in
As
As shown in
In this embodiment, when the internal drain assembly 56 has completed its job (see
Wound drain assemblies having the technical features described above were placed into internal wound voids surgically created in a porcine model. Also concurrently placed into surgical created wound voids in the same porcine model were conventional wound drains. The performance of efficacy of the wound drain assemblies were compared to the performance and efficacy of the conventional drains over a period of eight days.
More particularly, following induction of general anesthesia, prefascial pockets were elevated with scissor dissection through ten (10) cm incisions on left and right lateral sides of a pig over the latissimus dorsi muscles and external oblique muscles, just posterior to the front legs. The left and right side pockets were placed six (6) cm off the midline to assure the pockets were kept separate. Bovie cautery was used for hemostatsis and pockets were irrigated with a triple antibiotic solution used in implant surgery, comprising 1 gm of Ancef, 80 mg of Gentamicin, and 50,000 IU units of Bacitracin/500 cc NS.
Conventional Silastic Blake Drains (Ethicon, Inc., a Johnson & Johnson Company; Somerville, N.J.) were placed through the incisions into the subcutaneous pocket on the animal's left side. The Blake Drains (15 mm in diameter) were identical to those used clinically in practice in humans.
A wound drain assembly, like that shown in
Closure was performed in multiple layers on both sides with additional PDO Quill™ closure (Angiotech Pharmaceuticals), Dermabond® liquid skin adhesive (Ethicon, Inc., a Johnson & Johnson Company; Somerville, N.J.) applied to the skin, and Opsite® Post-Op waterproof dressings (Smith & Nephew), for a complete water tight seal at the operative sites.
Standard suction bulbs were placed on the Blake Drains to mimic current clinical usage.
A portable negative pressure V.A.C. pump (KCI), set to deliver a standard 125 mmHg of suction pressure, was coupled to the WDA to apply a uniform continuous suction in the wound void throughout the course of the study.
The animal was dressed in a specially designed post-surgical vest, with zippered pockets worn on the animals' backs. The drains were brought out of separate incisions beneath the vest and into a zipper pockets on the vest.
The same set up of a Blake Drain and a WDA was performed on a second pig, with a standard Blake Drain on the left side and the WDA on the right side.
The pigs did very well postoperatively. The drains remained intact attached to the animals and carried within the specially designed jacket pockets worn on the animals' backs. The animals received antibiotics daily and all wound pockets healed well with no infection.
The suction bulbs (on Blake Drains) and pumps (on the WDA's) were checked every four hours for the first twenty-four hours, every eight hours for the next three days, and then every twelve hours to completion of the study (on day 8). The dressings were changed, fluid recorded, bulbs recharged and canisters changed. The drain canisters were changed at the above schedule during animal feedings, and they tolerated the changes very well while they were feeding.
The canisters were weighed per-placement and weighed on removal. The drainage recorded from the animals is as follows:
The following observations were made:
(i) Over 80% of the WDA drainage occurred in the first 24 hours. In contrast, drainage on the standard drain side remained constant throughout the study period.
(ii) The exudates of the standard Blake Drains remained bloody and viscous throughout the study. In contrast, the exudates of the WDA had a quicker return on day 3 from bloody and viscous to a serum-straw colored fluid.
Following eight days of drain placement, the animals were brought back to surgery, and the wound voids were evaluated. The incisions had healed well and there was no evidence of infection.
Both Blake Drains had healed directly around the wound voids. However, the wound voids had not closed completely. As is typically experienced in human clinical situations, both of the Blake Drain sites in the porcine model had peripheral seroma pockets in the prior surgical spaces.
Both WDA's had complete closure of the prior surgical spaces around the entire periphery of the wound void, up to the point of the WDA itself. It was difficult to redevelop and finger fracture this space back open. Biopsy specimens show complete closure of the surgical space and healing.
Neither WDA had absolutely any adherence to the soft tissues, and there was no fragmentation of any open cell material in the surgical space. There was mild imprinting in the pocket where the WDA was located (this was also visualized on the Blake Drain side). The pocket surrounding the WDA was small, snug and tight, and just slightly larger than the WDA itself. There continued excellent flow through the WDA through the 8th day. Forces to remove the WDA were reasonably low.
The foregoing Example demonstrates that wound drain assemblies having the technical features described herein function very well, serving as an internal wound closure device to effectively close a large surgically created space. The entire surgical space was completely occluded and healed down to a pocket just surrounding the wound drain assembly itself, to the point it was very difficult to open the surgical space back up. There was no adherence or departiculation of the open cell material in the surgical space. The semilunar flaps performed well, maintaining easy and complete flow through them on suction, but not allowing any ingrowth or adherence of the assembly. Eighty percent (80%) of the fluid removed with the wound drain assembly occurred in the first day, then tapered off dramatically, with the exudates turning straw-colored on the third day.
The foregoing Example demonstrates that peripheral seroma cavities occurred in both animals with standard Blake Drains and bulbs, mimicking what occurs clinically in humans, where seroma cavities remain problems and the soft tissues often do not come together to allow approximation and healing through the natural body processes. Greater flow volumes continued throughout the study, with the evacuates remaining very bloody in the standard Blake Drain groups.
The Example demonstrates that applying a vacuum of significant pressure internally and directly in a wound void or body cavity using a wound drain assembly as disclosed herein results in the relatively quick and effective removal of the extracellular exudates comprising serous fluid, wound exudate, blood cells, blood products, blood clots, thrombus, wound debris, dead cells and other viscous byproducts of the wound healing process from the interior wound void, without substantial plugging, as well as results in an enhanced formation of tissue adherence and would healing. Applying a vacuum of significant pressure internally and directly in a wound void or body cavity using a wound drain assembly as disclosed herein accelerates healing by the application of a universal negative force to the entire wound volume, drawing the wound edges together, assisting closure, enhancing wound healing, and decreasing dead space and seroma. Applying a vacuum of significant pressure internally and directly in a wound void or body cavity using a wound drain assembly as disclosed herein brings about beneficial changes to the surgical site, including changes in microvascular blood flow dynamic; changes in interstital fluid; the removal of wound exudates; the stimulation of growth factors and collagen formation; the reduction in bacterial colonization; the mechanical closure of wound by “reverse tissue expansion;” increased adherence of the soft tissue and internal wound healing; and decreased dead space and seroma formation.
The invention provides assemblies, systems, and methods that not just manage blood and fluid collection in an internal wound cavity, but also close and eliminate the dead interior space, drawing the separated interior tissue surfaces together to promote adherence of the tissue surfaces and a normal wound healing process.
The foregoing is considered as illustrative only of the principles of the invention. Furthermore, since numerous modifications and changes will readily occur to those skilled in the art, it is not desired to limit the invention to the exact construction and operation shown and described. While the preferred embodiment has been described, the details may be changed without departing from the invention, which is defined by the claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/047,909, filed Oct. 7, 2013, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/052,873, filed Mar. 21, 2011 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,551,075), which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/661,293, filed Mar. 15, 2010 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,585,683), which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/810,027, filed Jun. 4, 2007 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,699,831), which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/646,918, filed Dec. 28, 2006 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,715,267), which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application 60/810,733, filed Jun. 2, 2006, which are each incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1355846 | Rannells | Oct 1920 | A |
2547758 | Keeling | Apr 1951 | A |
2632443 | Lesher | Mar 1953 | A |
2682873 | Evans et al. | Jul 1954 | A |
2969057 | Simmons | Jan 1961 | A |
3066672 | Crosby, Jr. et al. | Dec 1962 | A |
3367332 | Groves | Feb 1968 | A |
3520300 | Flower, Jr. | Jul 1970 | A |
3556101 | Economou | Jan 1971 | A |
3568675 | Harvey | Mar 1971 | A |
3648692 | Wheeler | Mar 1972 | A |
3682180 | McFarlane | Aug 1972 | A |
3826254 | Mellor | Jul 1974 | A |
3830238 | Kurtz et al. | Aug 1974 | A |
4080970 | Miller | Mar 1978 | A |
4096853 | Weigand | Jun 1978 | A |
4139004 | Gonzalez, Jr. | Feb 1979 | A |
4165748 | Johnson | Aug 1979 | A |
4184510 | Murry et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
4233969 | Lock et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
4245630 | Lloyd et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4250882 | Adair | Feb 1981 | A |
4256109 | Nichols | Mar 1981 | A |
4261363 | Russo | Apr 1981 | A |
4275721 | Olson | Jun 1981 | A |
4284079 | Adair | Aug 1981 | A |
4294240 | Thill | Oct 1981 | A |
4297995 | Golub | Nov 1981 | A |
4333468 | Geist | Jun 1982 | A |
4346711 | Agdanowski et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4373519 | Errede et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
4382441 | Svedman | May 1983 | A |
4392853 | Muto | Jul 1983 | A |
4392858 | George et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4398910 | Blake et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4419097 | Rowland | Dec 1983 | A |
4430084 | Deaton | Feb 1984 | A |
4465485 | Kashmer et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4475909 | Eisenberg | Oct 1984 | A |
4480638 | Schmid | Nov 1984 | A |
4525166 | Lecierc | Jun 1985 | A |
4525374 | Vaillancourt | Jun 1985 | A |
4540412 | Van Overloop | Sep 1985 | A |
4543100 | Brodsky | Sep 1985 | A |
4548202 | Duncan | Oct 1985 | A |
4551139 | Piaas et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4569348 | Hasslinger | Feb 1986 | A |
4605399 | Weston et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4608041 | Nielsen | Aug 1986 | A |
4633865 | Hengstberger et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4640688 | Hauser | Feb 1987 | A |
4655754 | Richmond et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4664662 | Webster | May 1987 | A |
4671796 | Groshong | Jun 1987 | A |
4692153 | Berlin et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4710165 | McNeil et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4717379 | Elkholwe | Jan 1988 | A |
4728642 | Pawelchak et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4733659 | Edenbaum et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4743232 | Kruger | May 1988 | A |
4758220 | Sundblom et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4787888 | Fox | Nov 1988 | A |
4815468 | Annand | Mar 1989 | A |
4825866 | Pierce | May 1989 | A |
4826494 | Richmond et al. | May 1989 | A |
4838883 | Matsuura | Jun 1989 | A |
4840187 | Brazier | Jun 1989 | A |
4844072 | French et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4863449 | Therriault et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4872450 | Austad | Oct 1989 | A |
4878901 | Sachse | Nov 1989 | A |
4897081 | Poirier et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4899965 | Usui | Feb 1990 | A |
4906233 | Moriuchi et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4906240 | Reed et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4908350 | Kramer et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4919654 | Kalt et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4925452 | Melinyshyn et al. | May 1990 | A |
4941882 | Ward et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4953565 | Tachibana et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4969880 | Zamierowski | Nov 1990 | A |
4985019 | Michelson | Jan 1991 | A |
5037397 | Kalt et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5086170 | Luheshi et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5092858 | Benson et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5100395 | Rosenberg | Mar 1992 | A |
5100396 | Zamierowski | Mar 1992 | A |
5134994 | Say | Aug 1992 | A |
5149331 | Ferdman et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5167613 | Karami et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5176663 | Svedman et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5192266 | Wilk | Mar 1993 | A |
5215522 | Page et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5232453 | Plass et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5261893 | Zamierowski | Nov 1993 | A |
5278100 | Doan et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5279550 | Habib et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5298015 | Komatsuzaki et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5342378 | Ruff | Aug 1994 | A |
5344415 | DeBusk et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5358494 | Svedman | Oct 1994 | A |
5437622 | Carion | Aug 1995 | A |
5437651 | Todd et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5437683 | Neumann et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5441481 | Mishra et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5443848 | Kramer et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5466231 | Cercone et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5484399 | Diresta et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5484428 | Drainville et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5527293 | Zamierowski | Jun 1996 | A |
5549584 | Gross | Aug 1996 | A |
5556375 | Ewall | Sep 1996 | A |
5607388 | Ewall | Mar 1997 | A |
5636643 | Argenta et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5637103 | Kerwin et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5645081 | Argenta et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5662598 | Tobin | Sep 1997 | A |
5701917 | Khouri | Dec 1997 | A |
5792173 | Breen et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5891111 | Ismael | Apr 1999 | A |
5893368 | Sugerman | Apr 1999 | A |
5902260 | Gilman et al. | May 1999 | A |
5938626 | Sugerman | Aug 1999 | A |
5947953 | Ash et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6042539 | Harper et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6051747 | Lindqvist et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6071267 | Zamierowski | Jun 2000 | A |
6135116 | Vogel et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6174306 | Fleischmann | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6190349 | Ash et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6241747 | Ruff | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6264979 | Svedman | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6287316 | Agarwal et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6345623 | Heaton et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6383162 | Sugarbaker | May 2002 | B1 |
6458109 | Henley et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6478789 | Spehalski et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6488643 | Tumey et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6493568 | Bell et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6537241 | Odland | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6553998 | Heaton et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6626891 | Ohmstede | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6685681 | Lockwood et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6695823 | Lina et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6752794 | Lockwood et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6814079 | Heaton et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6855135 | Lockwood et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6868657 | Shchervinsky | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6913589 | Dextradeur et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6936037 | Bubb et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6951553 | Bubb et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6979324 | Bybordi et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7105001 | Mandelbaum | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7182758 | McCraw | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7195624 | Lockwood et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7276051 | Henley et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7322971 | Shehada | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7338482 | Lockwood et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7381859 | Hunt et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7476205 | Erdmann | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7658735 | Spehalski | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7717871 | Odland | May 2010 | B2 |
7918817 | Schon et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8551075 | Bengtson | Oct 2013 | B2 |
20020062097 | Simpson | May 2002 | A1 |
20020065494 | Lockwood et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020077661 | Saadat | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020115951 | Norstrem et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020115956 | Ross | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120185 | Johnson | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020143286 | Tumey | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161317 | Risk et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030208149 | Coffey | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20050085795 | Lockwood | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050101922 | Anderson et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050131327 | Lockwood et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050261642 | Weston | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050273066 | Wittmann | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060029650 | Coffey | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041247 | Petrosenko et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060079852 | Bubb | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060122575 | Wakabayashi | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060189910 | Johnson et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070027414 | Hoffman et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070218101 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070282310 | Bengtson | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080058684 | Ugander et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080119802 | Riesinger | May 2008 | A1 |
20080167593 | Fleischmann | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090099519 | Kaplan | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20100030132 | Niezgoda et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100179516 | Bengtson | Jul 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
550575 | Aug 1982 | AU |
755496 | Feb 2002 | AU |
2005436 | Jun 1990 | CA |
2 303 085 | Mar 1999 | CA |
26 40 413 | Mar 1978 | DE |
2754775 | Jun 1979 | DE |
43 06 478 | Sep 1994 | DE |
295 04 378 | Oct 1995 | DE |
20115990 | Dec 2001 | DE |
69806842 | Jan 2003 | DE |
60118546 | Aug 2006 | DE |
102006032870 | Jan 2008 | DE |
1 088 569 | Aug 2003 | EA |
0100148 | Feb 1984 | EP |
0117632 | Sep 1984 | EP |
0161865 | Nov 1985 | EP |
271491 | Jun 1988 | EP |
0358302 | Mar 1990 | EP |
0506992 | Oct 1992 | EP |
0555293 | Aug 1993 | EP |
0777504 | Jun 1997 | EP |
0 853 950 | Oct 2002 | EP |
1284777 | Feb 2003 | EP |
1018967 | Aug 2004 | EP |
0 688 189 | Jun 2005 | EP |
0 620 720 | Nov 2006 | EP |
692578 | Jun 1953 | GB |
2058227 | Apr 1981 | GB |
2 195 255 | Apr 1988 | GB |
2 197 789 | Jun 1988 | GB |
2 220 357 | Jan 1990 | GB |
2 235 877 | Mar 1991 | GB |
2329127 | Mar 1999 | GB |
2 333 965 | Aug 1999 | GB |
2342584 | Apr 2000 | GB |
3 329 127 | Aug 2000 | GB |
2365350 | Feb 2002 | GB |
3056429 | May 1991 | JP |
H3-56429 | May 1991 | JP |
4129536 | Apr 1992 | JP |
71559 | Apr 2002 | SG |
WO 8002182 | Oct 1980 | WO |
WO 8001027 | Feb 1987 | WO |
WO 8704626 | Aug 1987 | WO |
WO 9010424 | Sep 1990 | WO |
WO 9207519 | May 1992 | WO |
WO 9309727 | May 1993 | WO |
WO 9420041 | Sep 1994 | WO |
WO 9605873 | Feb 1996 | WO |
WO 9634636 | Nov 1996 | WO |
WO 9718007 | May 1997 | WO |
WO 9901173 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO 9913793 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO 0007653 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 0007653 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 0042958 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO 0005424 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO 0057794 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO 0059418 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO 0189431 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0134223 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 0171231 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 0185248 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO 03057307 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO 03086232 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO 2006048246 | May 2006 | WO |
WO 2007031762 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO 2007041642 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO 2007109209 | Sep 2007 | WO |
WO 2007133618 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO 2008014358 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO 2008040020 | Apr 2008 | WO |
WO 2008041926 | Apr 2008 | WO |
WO 2008103625 | Aug 2008 | WO |
WO 2012080783 | Jun 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
US 6,216,701 B1, 04/2001, Heaton (withdrawn) |
Response filed Oct. 4, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/486,973. |
Advisory Action dated Oct. 12, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/486,973. |
RCE/Response filed Nov. 2, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/486,973. |
N.A. Bagautdinov, “Variant of External . . . ”, edited by V. Ye Volkov et al. (Chuvashia State University, Cheboksary, U.S.S.R. 1986);pp. 94-96 (copy and certified translation). |
Louis C. Argenta, MD and Michael J. Morykwas, PhD; “Vacuum-Assisted Closure: A New Method for Wound . . . ”, Annals of Plastic Surgery, vol. 38, Mo. 6, Jun. 1997; pp. 563-576. |
Susan Mendez-Eastmen, RN; “When Wounds Won't Heal” RN Jan. 1998, vol. 61 (1); Medical Economics Company, inc., Montvale, NJ, USA; pp. 20-24. |
James H. Blackburn, II, MD, et al., “Negative-Pressure Dressings as a Bolster for Skin Grafts”; Annais of Piastic Surgery; vol. 40, No. 5, May 1998, pp. 453-457. |
John Masters; “Reliable . . . ”; Letter to the Editor, British Journal of Plastic Surgery, 1998, vol. 51 (3), p. 267; Elsevier Science/British Assocn of Plastic Surgeons, UK. |
S.E. Greer, et al, “The Use of Subatmospheric Pressure Dressing Therapy to Close Lymphocutaneous Fistulas of . . . ”, British Journal of Plastic Surgery (2000), 53, pp. 484-487. |
George V. Letsou, MD., et al., “Stimulation of Adenylate Cyclase Activity in Cultured Endotheiiai Ceiis . . . ”; Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery; 31, 1990, pp. 634-639. |
Orringer, Jay, et al. “Management of Wounds in Patients with Complex Enterocutaneous Fistulas”; Surgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics, Jul. 1987, vol. 165, pp. 79-80. |
International Search Report for PCT International Application PCT/GB95/01983, dated Nov. 23, 1995. |
PCT International Search Report for PCT International Application PCT/GB98/02713, dated Jan. 8, 1999. |
PCT Written Opionion; PCT International Application PCT/GB98/02713; dated Jun. 8, 1999. |
PCT International Examination and Search Report; PCT International Application PCT/GB96/02802; dated Jan. 15, 1998 & dated Apr. 29, 1997. |
PCT Written Opinion, PCT International Application PCT/G896/02802; dated Sep. 3, 1997. |
Dattiio, Philip, P., Jr., et al., “Medical Textiles: Application of an . . . ”; Journal of Textile and Apparel, Technology and Management, vol. 2, issue 2, Spring 2002, pp. 1-5. |
Kostyuchenok, B.M., et al., “Vacuum Treatment in the Surgical Managment of . . . ”, Vestnik Khirurgi, Sep. 1986; pp. 18-21 and 6 page English translation thereof. |
Davydov, Yu, A., et al., “Vacuum Therapy in the Treatment of Purulent Lactation . . . ”; Vestnik Khirurgi, May 14, 1988, pp. 66-70, and 9 page English translation thereof. |
Yusupov, Yu, N. et al., “Active Wound Drainage”, Vestnik Khirurgi, vol. 138, Issue 4, 1987, and 7 page English translation thereof. |
Davydov, Yu. A. et al., “Bacteriological and Cytological Assessment of Vacuum Therapy for . . . ”; Vestnik Khirurgi, Oct. 1988, pp. 48-52, and 8 page English translation thereof. |
Davydov, Yu. A. et al, Concepts for the Clinical-Biological Management of the Wound . . . ; Vestnik Khirurgi, Jul. 7, 1980, pp. 132-136, and 8 page English translation thereof. |
Chariker, Mark E., M.D., et al., “Effective Management of Incisionai and Cutaneous Fistuiae with Closed Suction . . . ”; Contemporary Surgery, vol. 34, Jun. 1989, pp. 59-83. |
Egneil Minor, “Instruction Book”, First Edition, 300 7502, Feb. 1975, pp. 24. |
Egneli Minor, “Addition to the Users Manual Concerning Overflow Protection—Concerns All Egneil Pumps”, Feb. 3, 1983, pp. 2. |
Svedman, P., “Irrigation Treatment of Leg Ulcers”, The Lancet, Sep. 3, 1983, pp. 532-534. |
Chinn, Steven D. et al., “Closed Wound Suction Drainage”; The Journal of Foot Surgery, vol. 4, No. 1, 1985, pp. 76-81. |
Arnljots, Bjorn et al., “Irrigation Treatment in Split-Thickness Skin Grafting of ntractable . . . ”, Scand J. Plastic Reconstr. Surgery, No. 19, 1985, pp. 211-213. |
Svedman, P., “A Dressing Allowing Continuous Treatment . . . ”, IRCS Medical Science: Biomedical Technology, Clinical Medicine, Surgery and Transplantation, vol. 7, 1979, p. 221. |
Svedman, P. et al., “A Dressing System Providing Fluid Supply and Suction Drainage Used for . . . ”; Annals of Plastic Surgery, vol. 17, No. 2, Aug. 1986, pp. 125-133. |
K,F. Jeter, T.E. Tintle, and M, Chariker; “Managing . . . ”, Chronic Wound Care, edited by D. Krasner (Health Managment Publications, Inc.; King of Prussia, PA 1990), pp. 240-246. |
G. Zivadinovic, V. Dukic, Z. Maksimovic, D. Radak, and P. Peska, “Vacuum Therapy in the . . . ”, Timok Medical Journal 11 (1986), pp. 161-164 (copy and certified translation). |
F.E. Johnson, “An Improved Technique for Skin Graft Placement Using a Suction Drain”, Surgery, Gynecoiogy, and Obstetrics 159 (1984), pp. 584-585. |
A.A. Safronov, Dissertation Abstract, . . . , (Central Scientific Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Moscow, U.S.S.R. 1967) (copy and certified translation). |
M Schein, R. Saadia, J.R. Jamieson, and G.A G. Decker, “The ‘Sandwich Technique’ in the Management of the Open Abdomen”, British Journal of Surgery 73 (1986), pp. 369-370. |
D.E. Tribbie, “An Improved Sump Drain-Irrigation Device of Simple Construction”, Archives of Surgery 105 (1972), pp. 511-513. |
M,J. Morykwas, L.C. Argenta, E.i. Sheiton-Brown, and W. McGuirt, “Vacuum-Assisted Closure: A Mew Method . . . ”, Annals of Plastic Surgery 38 (1997), pp. 553-562 (Morykwas I). |
C. E. Tennants, “The Use of Hypermia in the Postoperative Treatment of Lesions of the Extremeties . . . ”, Journal of the American Medical Association 64 (1915), pp. 1548-1549. |
Selections from W. Meyer and V. Schmieden, Bier's Hyperemic Treatment in . . . , (W.B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia, PA 1909), pp. 17-25, 44-64, 90-96, 167-170, and 210-211. |
The V.A.C.™ Vacuum Assisted Closure, Assisting in Wound Closure, Brochure, Jan. 1995, 5 pages, 1-A-042, KCI®, San Antonio, Texas. |
Argenta et al., “The V.A.C.™, Case Study #4”, Case Study, Mar. 1995, 1 page, 35-D-004, KCi®, San Antonio, Texas. |
Argenta et al., “The V.A.C.™, Case Study #3”, Case Study, Mar. 1995, 1 page, 35-D-003, KCi®, San Antonio, Texas. |
“The V.A.C.® Operations Summary, the V.A.C.® Wound Closure System Applications”, Brochure, Mar. 1997. 4 pages, 1-A-060, KCI ©, San Antonio, Texas. |
“The V.A.C. © Operations Summary, The V.A.C. © Wound Closure System Applications”, Brochure, Mar. 1999, 2 pages, 1-A-060, KCI®, San Antonio, Texas. |
Argenta et al., “V.A.C.® Wound Closure Device Case Study #3”, Case Study, Apr. 1998, 1 page, 35-D-003, KCI®, San Antonio, Texas. |
Argenta et al., “V.A.C.® Wound Closure Device Case Study #1”, Case Study, Apr. 1998, 1 page, 35-D-001, KCI®, San Antonio, Texas. |
Argenta et al., “V.A.C.® Wound Closure Device Case Study #8”, Case Study, Jun. 1996, 2 pages, 35-D-008, KCI®, San Antonio, Texas. |
Argenta et al., “V.A.C.® Wound Closure Device Case Study #7”, Case Study, Jun. 1996, 2 pages, 35-D-007, KCI®, San Antonio, Texas. |
Argenta et al., “V.A.C.® Wound Closure Device Case Study #8”, Case Study, Jun. 1996, 2 pages, 35-D-006, KCI®, San Antonio, Texas. |
Argenta et al., “V.A.C.® Wound Closure Device Case Study #9”, Case Study, Jun. 1996, 2 pages, 35-D-009, KCI®, San Antonio, Texas. |
Argenta et al., “V.A.C.® Wound Closure Device Case Study #5”, Case Study, Aug. 1994, 2 pages, 35-D-005, KCI®, San Antonio, Texas. |
Argenta et al., “V.A.C.® Wound Closure Device Case Study #4”, Case Study, Aug. 1994, 2 pages, 35-D-004, KCI®, San Antonio, Texas. |
Argenta et al., “V.A.C.® Wound Closure Device Case Study #3”, Case Study, Aug. 1994, 2 pages, 35-D-003, KCI®, San Antonio, Texas. |
Argenta et al., “V.A.C.® Wound Ciosure Device Case Study #2”, Case Study, Aug. 1994, 2 pages, 35-D-002, KCI®, San Antonio, Texas. |
Argenta et al., “V.A.C.® Wound Closure Device Case Study #1”, Case Study, Aug. 1994, 2 pages, 35-D-001, KCI®, San Antonio, Texas. |
Ex parte Quayle Office Action dated Feb. 7, 2005 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/275,871. |
Amendment filed Apr. 8, 2005 to Office Action dated Feb. 7, 2005 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/275,671. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 27, 2005 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/275,671. |
Response filed Oct. 19, 2005 to Non-Finai Office Action dated Jun. 27, 2005 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/275,671. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 10, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/275,671. |
Response filed Jul. 10, 2006 to Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 10, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/275,671. |
Supplemental Amendment filed Aug. 10, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/275,671. |
Final Office Action dated Apr. 17, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/275,671. |
Response filed Aug. 12, 2007 to Final Office Action dated Apr. 17, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/275,871. |
Advisory Action dated Jul. 11, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/275,671. |
Response filed Aug. 17, 2007 to Advisory Action dated Jul. 11, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/275,671. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 5, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/275,671. |
Response filed Sep. 5, 2007 to Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 5, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/275,671. |
Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due dated Feb. 4, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/275,671. |
V.A. Soiovev et al., “Guidelines, The Method . . . ”, editor-in-chief Prov. V.i. Parahonyak (S.M. Kirov Gorky State Medical Institute, Gorky, U.S.S.R. 1987) (“Soiovev Guidelines”). |
V.A. Kuznetsov & N.A. Bagautdinov, “Vacuum and Vacuum-Sorption . . . ”, edited by B.M. Kostyuchenoketai. (Moscow, U.S.S.R. Oct. 28-29, 1986) pp. 91-92 (“Bagautdinov II”). |
V.A. Soiovev, Dissertation Abstract, Treatment and Prevention of Suture Failures . . . , (S.M. Kirov Gorky State Medical Institute, Gorky, U.S.S.R. 1988) (“Soiovev Abstract”). |
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 4, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/275,671. |
Translation of the Nullity Action of Sep. 10, 2010 (submitted by applicant). |
Meyer et al., “A New Abdominal Drain for Overflowing Lavage in Instances of Severe Pancreatitis with Persistent . . . ”, Surg. Gynecol, Obstet. Sep. 1987: 185 (3): 271-3. |
Poritz, “Percutaneous Drainage and iieocolectomy for Spontaneous Intraabdominal Abscess in Chrohns Disease . . . ”, J. Gastrointest. Surg. Feb. 2007: 11 (2): 204-8. |
Khurrum et al., “Percutaneous Postoperative Intra-abdominal Abscess Drainage After Elective Colorectal Surgery . . . ”, Tech. Coloprotocl. Dec. 2002: 6(3): 159-64. |
Reckard et al., “Management of intraabdominal . . . ”, Journal of Vascuai Interventional journal of Vascuai Interventionai Radiology, vol. 16, issue 7, pp. 1019-1021. |
Latenser et al., “A Pilot Study Comparing Percutaneous Decompression with Decompressive Laparotomy for Acute . . . ”, J Burn Care & Rehav, 23(3): 190-195. |
Kubiak et al., “Reduced Intra-Peritoneai Inflammation . . . ”, Critical Care I, vol. 207, No. 38, Sep. 2008, S34-35. |
Kaplan, “Managing the Open Abdomen”. Ostorny Wound Management, Jan. 2004; 50 1A supply; C2; 1-8. |
Kaplan et al., “Guidelines for the Management of the Open Abdomen”, WOUNDS Oct. 2005; 17 (Suppl 1); S1S24. |
Garner et al., “Vacuum-assisted Wound Closure Provides Early Fascial Reapproximation . . . ”, The American Journal of Surgery, Dec. 2001; 182 (6); 830-8. |
Barker et al., “Vacuum Pack of Technique of Temporary Abdominal Closure: A 7-year Experience with 112 Patients . . . ”, J Trauma Feb. 1, 2000; 48 (2): 201-6. |
Brock et al., “Temporary Closure of Open Abdominal Wounds: The Vacuum Pack”, Am Surg. Jan. 1995, 81 (1): 30-5. |
Sherck et al., “Covering the Open Abdomen : A Better Technique”, Am Surg. Sep. 1998; 84(9): 854-7. |
Dubick et al., “issues of Concern Regarding the Use of Hypertonic/Hyperoncotic Fluid Resuscitation of Hemorrhagic Hypotension . . . ”, Apr. 2006; 25 (4): 321-8. |
Burdette, “Systemic Inflammatory Syndrome”,—print, Apr. 2007 http://emedicine.medscape.com/article. |
Beamis Hydrophobic Rigid Canisters—http://www.bemisheaithcare.com/docs/CanisterHydrophobic.pdf (date unknown). |
Fink et al., “Textbook of Critical Care”, 5th ed. (Philadelphia: Eisevier, 2005), 1933-1943. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 5, 2009 for PCT/US2009/044264. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 18, 2009 for PCT/US2009/044230. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 17, 2009 for PCT/US2009/044240. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 5, 2009 for PCT/US2009/044268. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 6, 2009 for PCT/US2009/044226. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 15, 2009 for PCT/US2009/044244. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 8, 2009 for PCT/US2009/044266. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 5, 2009 for PCT/US2009/044245. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 23, 2009 for PCT/US2009/044235. |
Restriction Requirement dated Jan. 4, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/466,973. |
Response filed Jan. 21, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/486,973. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Mar. 5, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/466,973. |
Response filed May 20, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/486,973. |
Examiner Interview Summary dated May 25, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/466,973. |
Final Office Action dated Aug. 12, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/466,973. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180028730 A1 | Feb 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60810733 | Jun 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13052873 | Mar 2011 | US |
Child | 14047909 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14047909 | Oct 2013 | US |
Child | 15782661 | US | |
Parent | 11810027 | Jun 2007 | US |
Child | 12661293 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12661293 | Mar 2010 | US |
Child | 13052873 | US | |
Parent | 11646918 | Dec 2006 | US |
Child | 11810027 | US |