The present invention relates to an assembly, comprising a first and a second member, and a connector to connect the first and second member relative to each other.
The invention further relates to a method of assembling such an assembly of a first and a second member that each comprise at least one passage.
The present invention is particularly suitable for offshore applications, e.g. for connecting a wind turbine to a monopile, a wind turbine to a transition piece, a transition piece to a monopile, as well as between members, i.e. tower segments, of a monopile or wind turbine, and jacket connections. It may also be used for a connection between the tower of a monopile and a nacelle, and possibly also for connecting rotor blades to the nacelle.
According to prior art applications in offshore, the members of such assemblies are traditionally provided with flanges which are connected using bolts of significant size. Currently M72 bolts are used for connecting a wind turbine tower to a monopile or transition piece. In a first step, these bolts are electrically tightened with 8.000 Nm. In a second step, the preload is increased with hydraulic tools to 22.000 Nm. The bolts itself are heavy and the tools for tightening the bolts is also heavy and hard to handle.
It appears that the actual preload on the bolts after some settling time is hard to predict and control, and may vary significantly. Although it is not exactly clear which factors influence the torque-tension relationship of the bolts, it may be concluded that installing the bolts using a “constant torque” method does not achieve satisfying results. Similar issues occur with tensioning systems for bolting. The preload on the bolts must be regularly checked and adjusted, periodically requiring significant maintenance work.
Furthermore, the bolts are arranged all around the circumference of the flanges, leaving only a very limited gap between adjacent bolts. A connection using flanges with bolts is insufficiently scalable to meet the ever increasing demands resulting from even larger wind turbines and greater depths as sea where they are installed.
International patent application WO 2018/139929 A1 of the same inventor proposes an assembly that is improved relative to a connection using flanges connected by bolts. This improved prior art assembly comprises:
The actuator is radially displaceable with respect to the longitudinal axis of the section that comprises the actuator. This allows the actuator itself to be employed as part of a clamp. During radial displacement of the actuator, an inclined surface of the actuator engages a specially machined surface of the first section and gradually increases the clamping force that connects the first and the second section. Although the assembly of WO 2018/139929 A1 already provided a significant improvement relative to the above-described traditional prior art connections using flanges connected by bolts, the inventor proposed further improvements, especially in order to overcome the disadvantage of the assembly of WO 2018/139929 A1 that a radial displacement of the actuator required a significant force due to the clamping action. Moreover, sections with a specially designed contact surface were required.
International patent application WO 2020/035770 A1 of the same inventor, which is considered the closest prior art for the present invention, proposed an improved assembly. At least the features of the characterizing portion of claim 1 are novel relative to WO 2020/035770 A1.
Relative to the assembly of WO 2018/139929 A1, a user may insert the connector of WO 2020/035770 A1 into the channel to an end position in a first step, followed by a further step of consecutively expanding said connector radially relative to said channel, to thereby connect the first and second member relative to each other. In this way, the connector may be accurately and easily placed in the channel by a user with very limited hassle or force. Only when the connector is placed in its desired end position, it is expanded in the channel to connect the first and second member relative to each other. Use of a connector as described in WO 2018/139929 A1 also makes specially machined contact surfaces with an inclination corresponding to an inclination of the radially displaceable actuator redundant.
Relative to the older prior art of bolted flanges, large scale (e.g. M72 as used nowadays in the year 2021, and future windparks even considering bolts up to M90) bolts are redundant. Also, the body may be less bulky than a flange comprising passages to accommodate a bolt. As a result, the assembly according to the invention, requires less material, is therefore more compact and lighter, and also more elegant. Whereas thick parts need to be forged, smaller parts may also be rolled, possibly allowing the members to be formed with alternative and more attractive manufacturing methods. Also, the assembly as described in WO 2018/139929 A1 is scalable, providing the opportunity to arrange multiple connectors in an axial direction of the members.
A further advantage of the assembly of WO 2020/035770 A1 relative to traditional bolted flanges, is the absence of these flanges, that would provide a significant mass outside the path where forces travel during driving the assembly into a ground using a hammer. The mass of conventional flanges may result in bending of the neck of the flanges. These bending stresses currently result in significantly reduced life time of the welds of these flanges when installed with a conventional impact hammer.
An even further advantage of the assembly of WO 2020/035770 A1 relative to bolted flanges, is that it may be applied for connecting members under the waterline. On the one hand, longitudinal members of a limited length may be used, allowing smaller ships to transport them to a desired location for an offshore construction.
The successively tightening the bolts of a bolted flange-which are typically tightened in multiple steps, as mentioned above—is very time consuming and labor-intensive. The assembly proposed in WO 2020/035770 A1 is less labor-intensive and time consuming than a connection having bolted flanges.
Compared to the older prior art of bolted flanges as described above, the connection provided by WO 2020/035770 A1 will show a superior fatigue resistance which is less sensitive to preload loss than typical bolted L-flanges, even under reduced preload levels relative to the initial torque upon installment. In bolted L-flanges the pre-tension is vital to prevent significant load fluctuations from occurring in the bolts or studs which have a poor fatigue resistance due to the presence of the threads. The connection provided by the proposed assembly proposed in WO 2020/035770 A1 does not experience these issues since the bolt only keeps the wedges in place but is, due to its orientation, not subjected to large load fluctuations. The main/dominant load fluctuations are experienced in the first member.
As discussed above, the previous international patent applications WO 2018/139929 A1 and WO 2020/035770 A1 of the same inventor already proposed a large number of significant improvements relative to the older prior art of bolted flanges. Nevertheless, there is an ongoing need to further improve such assemblies. In particular, there is an ongoing desire to optimize such an assembly, while preferably maintaining as much as possible of the above mentioned advantages of the closest prior art WO 2020/035770 A1.
An objective of the present invention is to provide an assembly, that is improved relative to the prior art and wherein at least one of the above stated problems is obviated or alleviated.
Said objective is achieved with the assembly according to claim 1 of the present invention, comprising:
Due to the cross sectional area and the height of the first expansion block being smaller than the cross sectional area and the height of the second expansion block, the total radial height of the connector may be optimized, especially in view of providing an optimized strength to dimension ratio. Thus, compared to the connector of the assembly according to the closest prior art WO 2020/035770 A1, the dimensions of the connector may be smaller at the same strength of the connector. A smaller connector saves materials, both in the connector itself, but also in the first and second member of the assembly. A smaller connector is also lighter in weight, which is an advantage for personnel installing said connectors. And besides providing an assembly with an optimized connector, as much as possible of the above mentioned advantages of the closest prior art WO 2020/035770 A1 are also maintained.
The invention further relates to a method of assembling a first and a second member that each comprise at least one passage, wherein the second member has a fork-shaped cross section with a main body arranged between two substantially parallel walls that each comprise at least one passage, said method comprising the steps of:
Preferred embodiments are the subject of the dependent claims.
The various aspects and features described and shown in the specification can be applied, individually, wherever possible. These individual aspects, and in particular the aspects and features described in the attached dependent claims, may be an invention in its own right that is related to a different problem relative to the prior art and that may be made the subject of a divisional patent application.
In the following description preferred embodiments of the present invention are further elucidated with reference to the drawing, in which:
An example of an offshore construction comprising multiple connections C where an assembly according to the invention may be applied is shown in
The connections C may be applied between separate members 8 of the monopile 3, between the monopile 3 and the transition piece 4, between the transition piece 4 and the turbine tower 1, between members 9 of the turbine tower 1, and between a rotor blade 6 and a hub of a rotor.
During use, a wind turbine 5 will be oriented such that the rotor blades 6 are optimally driven by the available wind power. The rotor blades 6 drive a (not shown) generator in the nacelle 7, wherein the generator generates electricity. The wind turbine 5 causes alternating loads on any connection C in the construction, and dependent on the wind direction, specific parts of the connection C have to absorb most of the loads.
The assembly according to the present invention comprises a first member 10 and a second member 11. The second member 11 has a fork-shaped cross section with a main body 12 arranged between two substantially parallel walls 13 that each comprise at least one passage 14 (
A connector 18 (
The connector 18 exhibits a length L extending in a longitudinal direction of the channel 17 and comprises a first expansion block 20 that is configured to push the first member 10 against the face 15 of the main body 12 of the second member 11, and a second expansion block 21 that is configured to contact the faces defined 19 by the passages 14 in the substantially parallel walls 13 of the second member 11. The connector 18 furthermore comprises one or more than one wedge 22, 23 that is arranged in between the first expansion block 20 and the second expansion block 21, and that is configured to be displaced longitudinally relative to the channel 17 to thereby radially expand the connector 18 relative to the channel 17.
At a cross section CS halfway the length L of the connector 18, the cross sectional area A1 and the height h1 of the first expansion block 20 in the radial direction relative to said channel 17 is smaller than the cross sectional area A2 and the height h2 of the second expansion block 21 in said radial direction relative to said channel 17.
After many years of testing and Finite Element simulations of the connector described in the closest prior art document WO 2020/035770 A1, the inventor has come to the insight that the first expansion block 20 and the second expansion block 21 are exposed to bending moments of a very different magnitude, even though they jointly provide the clamping contact for the pre-tensioned connection between the first member 10 and the second member 11. This difference in bending moment may, in hindsight, be explained by the path the forces follow through the first expansion block 20, and the second expansion block 21, respectively (
If, at the cross section CS halfway the length L of the connector 18, the cross sectional area A1 and the height h1 of the first expansion block 20 in the radial direction relative to said channel 17 is smaller than the cross sectional area A2 and the height h2 of the second expansion block 21 in said radial direction relative to said channel 17, the connector 18 may be optimized in terms of strength in relation to its size. In other words, for connectors 18 having the same strength, the total height of the connector 18 according to the invention in radial direction relative to said channel may be significantly smaller than the height of the connector disclosed in the closest prior art document WO 2020/035770 A1.
A connector 18 having a smaller height results in a more compact connector 18 that requires less material and that is moreover lighter in weight and therefore easier to handle by personnel installing the connectors 18. Moreover, a smaller and more compact connector 18 not only saves materials for the connector 18 itself, but also in the first member 10 and the second member 11 of the assembly.
Besides providing an optimized connector 18, the connector 18 according to the present invention is able to maintain as much as possible of the above mentioned advantages of the closest prior art WO 2020/035770 A1.
In the expanded state of the connector 18, it pushes against faces 19 of the passages 14 of the second member 11 that are directed away from the main body 12 thereof to define the pre-tensioned connection between the first member 10 and the second member 11.
In the expanded state of the connector 18, wherein the connection between the first member 10 and the second member 11 is pre-tensioned, the passage 16 of the first member 10 is arranged at an offset relative to the passages 14 in the second member 11. This offset is arranged in the radial direction relative to the channel 17.
The connector 18 comprises a compacted state, wherein the connector 18 has a size that is freely insertable into and out of the channel 17 (
At the cross section CS halfway the length L of the connector 18, the height h1 of the first expansion block 20 in the radial direction relative to said channel 17 is preferably equal to or less than 66% of the height h2 of the second expansion block 21 in said radial direction relative to said channel 17. The position of this cross section CS halfway the length L of the connector 18 is arranged at or near the middle of the face 15 of the main body 12 of the second member 11. As explained above, at this position, forces passing through the first expansion block 20 are only of a limited magnitude, whereas the bending forces experienced by the second expansion block 21 reach a maximum value at this position.
At the cross section CS halfway the length L of the connector 18, the cross sectional area A1 of the first expansion block 20 is preferably equal to or less than 66% of the cross sectional area A2 of the second expansion block 21. A larger cross sectional area is related to an increased bending strength.
In a preferred embodiment, the height h1 of the first expansion block 20 in the radial direction relative to said channel 17 is, at a cross section CS halfway the length L of the connector 18, at least 50% of a radius of a side of the passage 14 in the first member 10 that is directed towards the main body 12 of the second member 11. However, even more preferably the height h1 of the first expansion block 20 in the radial direction relative to said channel 17 is, at the cross section CS halfway the length L of the connector 18, in the range of 100%-125% of the radius of the side of the passage 14 in the first member 10 that is directed towards the main body 12 of the second member 11. In the shown embodiment, the height h1 is about 100% of the radius of the side of the passage 14, which allows the first expansion block 20 to abut against substantially the full area of a face 26 of the end portion 24 of the first member 10 and distribute the forces over a maximum area, while at the same time allowing the height h1 of the first expansion block 20 to be as small as possible. If the first expansion block 20 is strong enough to withstand the forces it is exposed to at this height h1, there is no need to further increase the height h1. The smaller the height h1 of the first expansion block 20, the more compact and lightweight the connector 18 may be.
The connector 18 is shown in great detail in
Although both wedges 22, 23 may be identical in size, this is not the case in the shown embodiment. The wedge 22 exhibits a greater length to make it easily accessible and actuated by an actuator 31, which is embodied as a nut 32 that may be driven along a threaded rod 33. However, the opposite wedge 23, that doesn't need to be readily accessible, may deliberately be designed smaller to save weight and design the connector 18 as lightweight as possible.
The first sliding surface 27, 28 encloses a first angle α relative to the longitudinal direction of the channel 17, and the second sliding surface 29, 30 encloses a second angle β relative to the longitudinal direction of the channel 17, wherein the first angle α is smaller than the second angle β. The larger height h2 of the second expansion block 21, that is required to provide sufficient bending strength, may also be used to accommodate a wedge 22, 23 requiring a relatively large second angle β. In this way, the radial expansion range of the connector 18 may be provided primarily or even fully by the larger second expansion block 21, allowing the height h of the first expansion block 20 to be as small as possible. The first angle α being smaller than the second angle β thus allows the connector 18 to be optimized terms in of strength in relation to its size.
The first angle α is in the range of 0-15°, and preferably in the range of 0-5°. In the shown preferred embodiment, the first angle α is about 0°, which allows the first expansion block 20 to be designed with a minimum height h1.
The second angle β is in the range of 5-30°, which allows for a sufficient radial expansion range of the connector 18, even if the first angle α is in the range of 0-15°.
In order to further reduce the weight of the connector 18, the height h1 of first expansion block 20 may reduce towards one or more than one longitudinal end 36 thereof.
A method of assembling the first member 10 and the second member 11 is now described with reference to
The next step comprises positioning the passages 14, 16 of the first 10 and the second member 11 to define a channel 17 (
The previous step is followed by inserting the connector 18 into the channel 17 to an end position (
The next steps comprise the step of consecutively expanding said connector 18 radially relative to said channel 17, to thereby connect the first member 10 and the second member 11 relative to each other, and the expanded connector 18 pushing the first member 10 in a radial direction relative to said channel 17 against the face 15 of the main body 12 of the second member 11 to define a clamping contact and thereby a pre-tensioned connection in a radial direction relative to said channel 17 between the face 15 of the main body 12 of the second member 11 and the faces 19 defined by the passages 14 in the substantially parallel walls 13 of the second member 11.
In the shown preferred embodiment, the second expansion block 21 is configured to abut the faces 19 defined by the passages 14 in the substantially parallel walls 13 of the second member 11 only at or near longitudinal ends 37 of said second expansion block 21 when the connector 18 is in an unloaded state, i.e. the compacted state, prior to the connector 18 being expanded to the expanded state thereof. Thus, for the method, the step of inserting the connector 18 into the channel 17 to an end position comprises an end position wherein the second expansion block 21 abuts the faces 19 defined by the passages 14 in the substantially parallel walls 13 of the second member 11 only at or near longitudinal ends 37 of said second expansion block 21 when the connector is in an unloaded state. This is the state shown in
In the shown preferred embodiment, the second expansion block 21 is configured to abut the faces 19 defined by the passages 14 in the substantially parallel walls 13 of the second member 21 over at least half of the length of said faces 19 when the connector 18 is radially expanded to the expanded state to define the pre-tensioned connection. Thus, for the method, the step of the expanded connector 18 pushing the first member 10 in a radial direction relative to said channel 17 comprises deforming the second expansion block 21 of the connector 18 until the second expansion block 21 abuts the faces 19 defined by the passages 14 in the substantially parallel walls 13 of the second member 11 over at least half of the length of said faces 19 when the connector 18 is radially expanded to the expanded state to define the pre-tensioned connection. This is the state shown in
By starting the initial contact only at or near the longitudinal ends 37 of the second expansion block 21, and due to the contact surface 38 between the outer end 25 of the second expansion block 21 and the faces 19 of the second member 11 only gradually increasing when the second expansion block 21 deforms when the bending forces increase, it is prevented that the substantially parallel walls 13 of the second member 21 are pushed away from each other, i.e. outward relative to the longitudinal direction of the channel 17. As a result, the thickness of the walls 13 of the second member 21 that extends parallel to the longitudinal direction of the channel 17 may be reduced. Consequently, the second member 11 may be designed lighter, saving material. Starting the initial contact only at or near the longitudinal ends 37 of the second expansion block allows for a more homogeneous pressure distribution between the second member 21 and the faces 19, thereby reducing the risk of significant plastic deformation.
The outer end 25 of the second expansion block 21 and the faces 19 defined by the passages 14 in the substantially parallel walls 13 of the second member 11 preferably enclose an angle γ≤2° upon initial contact in the unloaded state of the connector 18.
Although the faces 19 may be machined to provide the angle γ, this angle γ is preferably defined by a corresponding shape or curvature R (see
The material of the second expansion block 21 may exhibit a higher yield strength than the material of first expansion block 20.
In a preferred embodiment (as best seen in
The above described embodiment is intended only to illustrate the invention and not to limit in any way the scope of the invention. Accordingly, it should be understood that where features mentioned in the appended claims are followed by reference signs, such signs are included solely for the purpose of enhancing the intelligibility of the claims and are in no way limiting on the scope of the claims. The scope of protection is defined solely by the following claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2029335 | Oct 2021 | NL | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/NL22/50575 | 10/7/2022 | WO |