1. Field of the Invention
The invention is directed to metalworking operations and, more particularly, to a method and assembly for rotating a cutting insert about the insert central axis during a metalworking operation. The subject invention is also directed to the cutting insert itself, the assembly with a toolholder and such an insert, and the operation of the assembly.
2. Description of Related Art
During a metalworking operation, such as a turning operation, where a stationary cutting insert is urged against a rotating workpiece, the insert cutting edge acting upon the workpiece is heated by the workpiece until the operation is complete or until the cutting edge begins to break down through a failure mechanism, such as crater wear or plastic deformation. To avoid these modes of failure, and to permit more efficient operation of the cutting insert, in the past, circular cutting inserts have been mounted upon toolholders, such that the cutting inserts were freely rotatable about the insert central axis. A particular cutting insert was then presented to the workpiece and oriented in such a fashion that the rotary motion of the workpiece on, for example, a lathe, imparted to the cutting insert a force acting in a direction tangential to the insert. The motion of the workpiece acted against the cutting insert not only to machine the workpiece but, furthermore, to rotate the circular cutting insert such that the cutting edge of the insert was continuously refreshed. As a result, under ideal conditions, no single segment of the cutting edge experienced prolonged exposure to the workpiece. Furthermore, the cutting edge operated at a lower temperature, thereby allowing greater cutting forces and improved efficiency of the metalworking operation.
This type of spinning insert may exhibit extraordinarily long tool life at remarkable speeds. However, this same spinning insert may fail in an equally dramatic fashion when the cutting conditions change slightly, or when the cartridge bearings, used by the cutting insert for rotation, begin to deteriorate.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,178,818 is directed to a method of cutting solids of revolution by a rotary cutting tool having a circular cutting tip. The cutting insert is secured to a spindle which is mounted with bearings within a housing. Coolant is introduced through the spindle into a wind turbine, thereby imparting rotation to the cutting insert. However, the torque resulting from cutting forces tending to rotate the insert is much higher than that developed by the stream of coolant urging rotation of the cutting insert. Rotation is imparted to the cutting insert primarily by interaction with the workpiece. The purpose of the wind turbine is to enable the circular cutting insert to continue its rotation even during an interrupted cut, at which time there is no contact between the cutting insert and the workpiece to provide frictional rotation. As a result, this cutting insert design depends upon extracting from the rotating workpiece a tangential force to rotate the cutting insert.
A method and assembly are needed capable of rotating a cutting insert about its own axis during a metalworking operation, whereby the speed and direction of rotation is not determined by the rotation of the workpiece itself, but is determined by independent forces acting upon the cutting insert.
One embodiment of the invention is directed to an assembly comprised of a cutting insert having a central axis extending therethrough, wherein the insert is comprised of a body having a top surface, a bottom surface, at least one side therebetween, and a cutting edge at the intersection of the at least one side and the top surface. The assembly also has a toolholder upon which the cutting insert is mounted, wherein the toolholder is adapted to rotate the insert about the central axis at a predetermined rotational speed.
Another embodiment of the invention is directed to a method wherein with a cutting insert having a body with a top surface, a bottom surface, at least one side therebetween, a cutting edge at the intersection of the at least one side and the top surface, and a central axis extending through the top surface and the bottom surface, the method of machining is comprised of the steps of aligning the insert such that the central axis forms an angle with the longitudinal axis of a rotating workpiece, rotating the insert about the central axis of the insert, and urging the insert against the workpiece to initiate the machining operation.
Another embodiment of the invention is directed to a cutting insert comprised of a body with a central axis extending therethrough and having a top surface, a bottom surface, at least one side therebetween, a cutting edge at the intersection of the at least one side and the top surface, and at least one projection extending from the top surface, positioned apart and radially at equal distances from the central axis and spaced inwardly from the cutting edge to act as chip breakers when the insert, used in a turning operation, is rotated about its central axis and applied against a rotating workpiece.
Yet another embodiment of the application is directed to an assembly comprised of a cutting insert and a toolholder. The cutting insert has a central axis extending therethrough and is comprised of a body having a top surface, a bottom surface, and at least one side therebetween. A cutting edge exists at the intersection of the at least one side and the top surface. The cutting insert is mounted within the toolholder. The insert has a frusto-conical portion mateable with a frusto-conical bore within the toolholder.
Yet another embodiment of the invention is directed to a cutting insert comprised of a body with a central axis extending therethrough and having a top surface, a bottom surface, and at least one side therebetween. The side has a frusto-conical shape. A cutting edge exists at the intersection of the at least one side and the top surface. A non-circular cavity extends upwardly into the bottom surface of the body.
Yet another embodiment of the invention is directed to a cutting insert and a toolholder. The cutting insert has a central axis extending therethrough and is comprised of a body having a top surface, a bottom surface, and at least one side therebetween. The side has a frusto-conical shape. A cutting edge exists at the intersection of the at least one side and the top surface. The toolholder has a toolholder body with a forwardly facing end and a bore extending rearwardly therein. The toolholder also has a central axis extending therethrough. The bore extends to a floor and a hoop with a wall is defined from the floor forward in the bore. The bore has a tapered section dimensioned to provide a resilient interference fit with the bottom surface of the cutting insert when the floor of the toolholder body is in abutment with the bottom surface of the insert. The toolholder has at least one slot extending through the hoop wall to permit expansion of the hoop wall when the insert is positioned within the toolholder bore such that the insert bottom surface is in abutment with the floor of the toolholder.
An assembly is comprised, in part, of the cutting insert 100 with its central axis 105 extending therethrough. The insert, as illustrated in
Briefly returning to
The workpiece 10 may be secured by a chuck 12 to a lathe 14 which rotates the workpiece 10 at a predetermined speed. Through this arrangement, it is possible to rotate the workpiece 10 at a predetermined speed and also to separately rotate the cutting insert 100 at a predetermined speed and to maintain the rotation of the insert 100 at that speed under load. Additionally, it is possible to synchronize the rotation of the insert 100 with the rotation of the workpiece 10. It is a standard practice to include closed loop feedback systems for monitoring and controlling the rotational speed of a workpiece 10 in a lathe 14 or other machine tool.
There are three groups of existing machine tools that could support the spindle 75 in accordance with the subject invention. Each of these groups of machine tools would include closed loop feedback controllers so the rotational speed of the spindle could be closely monitored and controlled. First are the four or more axis machining centers, wherein the toolholder would be secured to and rotated by the spindle. The workpiece would be rotated by the B or C rotary axis and the toolholder would be placed on the center of the rotary axis with the Z axis. The toolholder would be fed in the Y axis to turn a diameter on the workpiece or in the X axis for facing the workpiece.
A second group of machines includes combination turn/mill machines. In the typical nomenclature of these machines, the toolholder would be rotated by the spindle, while the workpiece would be rotated by the spindle in the headstock. The toolholder would then be placed on centerline of the workpiece with the X axis and a facing operation would be performed with the Y axis. Diameters on the workpiece would be turned by feeding in the Z axis.
The third group of potential machines includes conventional two-axis lathes that would be retrofitted with the spindle to rotate the inserts. This spindle would be mounted approximately mutually perpendicular with the headstock centerline and the X axis, and facing would be performed with X axis motion while turning of diameters of the workpiece would be performed with Z axis motion.
The retrofitted spindle could be driven by a variety of means. An electric servo drive has the advantage of easy integration into the CNC control system and easy programming of spindle rotation speed, while a hydraulic drive has the advantage of a lower cost and provides an extremely robust arrangement in the adverse environment (coolant, swarf, heat, etc.) within the machine tool enclosure.
Directing attention to
The cutting insert 100 further includes one or more projections 135 on the top surface 117 that may be identical to the projections 130 on the bottom surface 119 such that the insert 100 may be invertable and may be positively driven by the toolholder 50 in either position.
Directing attention to
The cutting inserts, in accordance with the subject invention, may be made of any materials typically utilized in a metalworking operation, including steel, cemented carbide, cermet, ceramic, PCBN (polycrystalline boron nitride), PCD (polycrystalline diamond) and diamond, each of which may or may not have coatings to improve performance. The selection of the material and/or coatings used for the cutting insert depends upon the workpiece material and the cutting conditions.
As previously discussed in the Background of the Invention, in the past, freely rotating inserts have been mounted to toolholders and the rotation of the workpiece provided a tangential force upon the insert such that the insert would spin relative to a stationary toolholder as the workpiece was rotated, thereby refreshing the cutting insert during the machining operation.
In accordance with the subject invention, the toolholder 50, with the cutting insert 100 secured thereupon, is rotated completely independently of the rotation of the workpiece 10. While the direction of rotation of a freely rotating cutting insert placed against a rotating workpiece is determined entirely by the orientation of the cutting insert and the speed and direction of rotation of the workpiece, the arrangement in accordance with the subject invention is not dependent upon these variables. To the contrary, the arrangement in accordance with the subject invention is capable of rotating the cutting insert 100 clockwise or counterclockwise about the central axis 105 and at any predetermined speed that is desired. In
By dictating the direction of rotation of the cutting insert 100, it is possible to manage the distribution of temperatures throughout the cutting inserts during a cutting operation. For example, when the insert 100 is rotating in the counterclockwise direction indicated by arrow 110, the cutting edge 125 is permitted to cool as it leaves the workpiece prior to re-entering the shoulder area 145 when the cutting insert 100 experiences its greatest forces and greatest temperatures. On the other hand, if the cutting insert 100 were to be rotated in a clockwise direction (opposite of that shown by arrow 110), then the cutting edge 125 would first begin to contact the workpiece along the reduced diameter portion 143 prior to the shoulder area 145 and would be at least partially heated prior to entering the shoulder area 145 for the most challenging portion of the cutting operation. Therefore, as can be seen, the dynamics of the cutting operation change depending upon the rotational direction of the cutting insert 100 relative to the workpiece 10.
A continuous predetermined rotational speed of the insert 10 promotes uniform heat distribution throughout the insert and, as a result, permits heat dissemination uniformly throughout the insert to minimize thermal gradients which contribute to stresses within the insert body.
The discussion so far has been directed to a cutting insert 100 and a cutting insert 200 having a circular configuration. Such an insert, to the extent that the toolholder 50 is moved parallel to a central axis 15 of the workpiece 10, will produce a machined segment having a circular cross-section. However, it is entirely possible to utilize a cutting insert which has a non-circular cross-section.
Directing attention to
Depending upon the conditions for a particular metalworking operation, it may be desirable to design the cutting insert with features that will promote formation of small cutting chips from the material removed from the workpiece 10. In particular, directing attention again to
It is also possible to control the size of cutting chips formed by material removed from the workpiece 10 through the introduction of other chip control features. Directing attention again to
In general, cutting inserts may be non-rotationally secured to the toolholder 50 using a variety of mechanisms known to those skilled in the art of rotating tooling. One such embodiment is illustrated in
The collet 85, illustrated in
While in
As illustrated in
While so far the removable cutting inserts discussed have been approximately disc shaped, it is possible to utilize differently shaped inserts so long as the top surface, and at least one side of the insert, includes features herein discussed.
In particular,
The frusto-conical shaped support post 630 defines a frusto-conical portion 632 mateable with the frusto-conical mating bore 650 of the toolholder 900. As a result, the frusto-conical portion 632 of the insert 600 forms an interference fit with the frusto-conical bore 650 of the toolholder 900. As illustrated in
In the Background of the Invention, the mode of tool failure for non-rotating inserts was identified as crater wear and plastic deformation as a result of the concentration of temperature and forces at one particular location on the cutting edge of the insert. The design, in accordance with the subject invention, while minimizing these failure modes of the metalcutting conditions of the prior art, introduces the possibility of transferring heat so effectively from the cutting insert to the toolholder that the toolholder may be subject to damage through excessive temperatures. Therefore, it may now be desirable to introduce cooling mechanisms for the toolholder.
Directing attention to
Details of the insert 700 are shown in
In addition to providing a bore extending through the toolholder for coolant, it is also possible to select the toolholder of a material that may be resistant to high temperatures. As an example, the toolholder material may be Inconel, or any of a number of other materials that provide sufficient structural rigidity and that are tolerant of high temperatures.
Under circumstances in which a dry cutting operation is required and coolant may not be introduced to the workpiece, it is possible, as illustrated in
Although not illustrated in
Directing attention to
Directing attention to
A circular insert with a ½ inch IC was secured to a toolholder in a fashion similar to that arrangement in
What has been so far discussed is a toolholder nonrotatably secured within a spindle such that rotation of the spindle translates to rotation of the toolholder, which translates to rotation of the cutting insert. However, this arrangement requires that the spindle be rotated. It is entirely possible, however, to utilize a stationary spindle and an auxiliary drive mechanism, such as a motor mounted upon the spindle, capable of rotating the toolholder within the stationary spindle.
The assembly includes a toolholder 1100 upon which the cutting insert 1000 is mounted through a mounting screw 1105 threadably engaged within the toolholder 1100. The toolholder 1100 is adapted to rotate the insert 1000 about the central axis 105 at a predetermined rotational speed. Additionally, the insert 1000 has a frusto-conical portion 1032 mateable with a frusto-conical bore 1150 within the toolholder 1100. The frusto-conical portion 1032 of the insert 1000 forms an interference fit with the frusto-conical bore 1150 of the toolholder 1100. The frusto-conical portion 1032 of the insert 1000, as illustrated in
As illustrated in
Again directing attention to
Again directing attention to
By utilizing the apparatus of the subject invention it is also possible to machine a workpiece to produce threads, as opposed to the previously described turning operation which removes material across overlapping widths of the workpiece.
In one example, the workpiece 10 is made of 4140 alloy steel. The clearance angle Y is 7° and the angle Z is also 7°. The insert 100, which is a ½ inch IC circular insert, is oriented perpendicular to the spindle axis of rotation B. The rotational speed of the workpiece 10 is 100 RPM while the rotational speed of the insert 100 is twice that speed, or 200 RPM. The feed rate of the insert 100 is equal to the desired pitch of the screw thread, which is 3 inches per revolution. The depth of cut is 0.010 inch. Under these circumstances the metal removal rate is 6 in3/min.
What has so far been discussed is a toolholder having a bore with a frusto conical wall to accept an insert having a generally matching frusto conical side. The wall of the toolholder has been essentially continuous and uninterrupted. The Applicants have discovered that it may be beneficial to have additional flexibility in the tapered bore of the toolholder and it may be beneficial to provide a positive displacement mechanism for removing the insert from the toolholder.
As illustrated in
Directing attention to the toolholder illustrated in
Directing attention to
The bore 2010 is tapered and provides a resilient interference fit with the side 1620 of the insert 1600 when the floor 2030 of the toolholder body 2005 is in abutment with the bottom surface 1619 of the insert 1600.
To provide a resilient interference fit but at the same time allow the insert 1600 to be removed with efficiency, slots 2040 extend through the hoop wall 2035 to permit expansion of the hoop wall 2035. It is the hoop wall 2035 of the bore 2010 that has an interior surface that is frusto conical.
The toolholder body 2005 further includes a boss 2045 extending from the floor 2030 of the toolholder body 2005. The boss 2045 has a non-circular profile intended to engage the non-circular cavity 1630 of the insert body 1635. While the shape illustrated in
Directing attention to
To permit additional radial expansion of the hoop wall 2035, a circumferential cavity 2055 extends within the floor 2035. See
It should be appreciated that while the toolholder body 2005 illustrated in
Its should also be appreciated that there is a resilient interference fit between the sleeve 20205 and the reduced portion 2020 to secure the sleeve 2025 on the toolholder body 2005.
Briefly directing attention to
In particular, directing attention to
Directing attention to
In the event it is not necessary to forcefully eject the insert body 1605 from the toolholder body 2005, then the passageway 2060 may be eliminated in favor of a simple slot 2040, as illustrated in
Additionally, as illustrated in
While specific embodiments of the invention have been described in detail, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that various modifications and alternatives to those details could be developed in light of the overall teachings of the disclosure. The presently preferred embodiments described herein are meant to be illustrative only and not limiting as to the scope of the invention which is to be given the full breadth of the appended claims and any and all equivalents thereof.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/012,621 filed Dec. 10, 2007, and claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/896,578 filed Mar. 23, 2007, and is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/616,939 filed Dec. 28, 2006, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/653,712 filed Sep. 2, 2003, and which issued on Jan. 2, 2007, as U.S. Pat. No. 7,156,006.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2153236 | Christman | Apr 1939 | A |
2206770 | Drummond | Jul 1940 | A |
2551167 | Rolland | May 1951 | A |
3037264 | Mossberg | Jun 1962 | A |
3299491 | Hall | Jan 1967 | A |
RE26637 | Vaughn | Jul 1969 | E |
3656377 | Kosem | Apr 1972 | A |
3670380 | Moore et al. | Jun 1972 | A |
3815192 | Ohtsu et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3925868 | Singh | Dec 1975 | A |
4024777 | Fogarty | May 1977 | A |
4178818 | Yascheritsyn et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
4233866 | Thomas | Nov 1980 | A |
4477211 | Briese | Oct 1984 | A |
4529048 | Hall | Jul 1985 | A |
4720216 | Smith | Jan 1988 | A |
4824300 | Pomikacsek | Apr 1989 | A |
4934883 | Andersson et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
5014581 | Komanduri et al. | May 1991 | A |
5026224 | Andersson et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5139371 | Kraft et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5224404 | Kono et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5431514 | Saito et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5478175 | Kraemer | Dec 1995 | A |
5597268 | Izumi | Jan 1997 | A |
5607263 | Nespeta et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5658100 | Deiss et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5674032 | Slocum et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5759086 | Klingel | Jun 1998 | A |
5769577 | Boddy | Jun 1998 | A |
5800098 | Satran et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5810518 | Wiman et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5827016 | Strand | Oct 1998 | A |
5931613 | Larsson | Aug 1999 | A |
6053671 | Stedt et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6073524 | Weiss et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6146060 | Rydberg et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6273650 | Jordberg | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6276879 | Hecht | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6312201 | Nagaya et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6453782 | Yamazaki et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6502487 | Yamazaki et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6503027 | Men | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6540448 | Johnson | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6626614 | Nakamura | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6896450 | Rothenstein | May 2005 | B2 |
6926475 | Kress et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7189039 | Pantzar | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7240593 | Little | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7325471 | Massa et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7381015 | Jonsson | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7390149 | Wihlborg | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7476061 | Edler | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7611313 | Hyatt et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
D659729 | de Souza Filho et al. | May 2012 | S |
20010009636 | Men | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20030210963 | Kakai et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20050047885 | Hyatt et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050152754 | Wiman et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060051167 | Massa et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20110318117 | de Souza Filho et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
275407 | Feb 1992 | CS |
3936539 | May 1991 | DE |
0506978 | Oct 1992 | EP |
0796689 | Dec 2001 | EP |
1325785 | Jul 2003 | EP |
1065881 | May 1954 | FR |
603968 | Jun 1948 | GB |
2057939 | Apr 1981 | GB |
2057939 | Apr 1981 | GB |
53048289 | May 1978 | JP |
61187612 | Nov 1986 | JP |
63295151 | Dec 1988 | JP |
03505997 | Dec 1991 | JP |
06091406 | Apr 1994 | JP |
6170607 | Jun 1994 | JP |
8500534 | Jan 1996 | JP |
2620507 | Jun 1997 | JP |
10277816 | Oct 1998 | JP |
3056021 | Feb 1999 | JP |
2595593 | May 1999 | JP |
2000015501 | Jan 2000 | JP |
2000024807 | Jan 2000 | JP |
200147382 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2001252817 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2002144112 | May 2002 | JP |
2002144112 | May 2002 | JP |
2002187006 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2010076033 | Apr 2010 | JP |
9907507 | Feb 1999 | WO |
2005021191 | Mar 2005 | WO |
2006028866 | Mar 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Manjunathaiah, “Rotating-Insert Tools for Machining CGI”, Research and New Product Development, Lamb Technicon Machining Systems, pp. 28-32 and 55, Warren, Michigan, 2002. |
Chen, “Cutting Temperature and Forces in Machining of High-Performance Materials with Self-Propelled Rotary Tool”, JSME International Journal, Series III, vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 180-185, 1992. |
Destefani, “Old Tool Design Takes Off”, Manufacturing Engineering, vol. 128, No. 1, Jan. 2002. |
Lei et al., “High-Speed Machining of Titanium Alloys Using the Driven Rotary Tool”, International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture,vol. 42, pp. 653-661, 2002. |
Shaw et al., “The Rotary Cutting Tool”, Transactions of the ASME, pp. 1065-1076, Cambridge, MA, Aug. 1952. |
Venuvinod et al., “Some Investigations Into Machining With Driven Rotary Tools”, Journal of Engineering for Industry, vol. 103, pp. 469-477, Nov. 1981. |
Armarego et al., “Fundamental Studies of Driven and Self-Propelled Rotary Tool Cutting Processes—I. Theoretical Investigation”, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manufact., vol. 34, No. 6, pp. 785-801, 1994. |
Armarego et al., “Predictive Cutting Model for Forces and Power in Self-Propelled Rotary Tool Turning Operations”, The University of Melbourne, pp. 19-24, 1994. |
Chen et al., “Characteristics of Self-Propelled Rotary Tools in Machining High-Performance Materials”, Int. J. Japan Soc. Prec. Eng., vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 267-272, Dec. 1991. |
Wang et al., “Evaluation of a Self-Propelled Rotary Tool in the Machining of Aerospace Materials”, Tribiology Transactions, vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 289-295, 1998. |
Nakajima et al., “Synthesis of High Crystalline Carbon-Nitrogen Layered Compounds by CVD Using Nickel and Cobalt Catalysts”, Carbon, vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 203-208, 1997. |
International Search Rep., Aug. 22, 2008. |
Studies on Turning With Spinning Tool, Dec. 7, 2007. |
Spinning Tool Brochure, Mori Seiki, The Machine Tool Company A New Spin on Cutting Tools, Mar. 1, 2007. |
Kishawy et al., Tool wear and chip formation during hard turning with self-propelled rotary tools, International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 2003, pp. 433-439, vol. 43. |
Kasei et al., Researches on Turning with Positively Driven Rotary Cutting Tool, Sep. 1977, pp. 43-49, vol. 43., English-language Abstract provided in paper. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080232909 A1 | Sep 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61012621 | Dec 2007 | US | |
60896578 | Mar 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10653712 | Sep 2003 | US |
Child | 11616939 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11616939 | Dec 2006 | US |
Child | 11956520 | US |