Patent Application
20160129398
The invention is directed toward assemblies including serially connected spiral modules.
Spiral wound filtration assemblies are used in a wide variety of fluid separations. In a conventional embodiment, a plurality of spiral wound membrane modules (“elements”) are serially arranged and interconnected within a pressure vessel. During operation pressurized feed fluid is introduced into the vessel, successively passes through the individual modules and exits the vessel in at least two streams: concentrate and permeate. Feed fluid flows through the vessel and becomes increasingly concentrated as permeate passes through the individual modules. Simultaneously, feed pressure within the vessel continually decreases due to resistance of the feed spacer and permeate back pressure increases. These effects result in permeate flux imbalances between individual elements that can lead to premature membrane fouling. Permeate flux imbalance reduces the volume of water than can be produced by the assembly without exceeding maximum flux guidelines for individual modules.
A variety of techniques have been used to mitigate these effects. For example: U.S. Pat. No. 4,046,685 draws permeate from both ends of the assembly which reduces permeate back pressure; U.S. Pat. No. 5,503,735 utilizes a downstream flow restrictor to restrict concentrate flow; U.S. 2007/0272628 utilizes a combination of elements having different standard specific flux values to better manage differences in operating conditions across the vessel; WO 2012/086478 utilizes a resistance pipe fixed within the permeate tube of an upstream element to reduce permeate flow; and U.S. Pat. No. 7,410,581 describes the use of flow restrictors that can be moved to alternative positioned along the permeate tubes of interconnected modules.
The present invention is directed toward a spiral wound assembly including: i) a pressure vessel comprising a feed inlet, concentrate outlet and permeate outlet, and ii) a plurality of spiral wound modules, each including at least one membrane envelop wound around a permeate tube. The spiral wound modules are serially arranged within the pressure vessel with a first element of the series positioned adjacent to a first end of the pressure vessel and a last element of the series positioned adjacent to an opposing second end of the pressure vessel. The permeate tubes of the spiral wound elements are serially connected to form a permeate pathway which is connected to the permeate outlet. The assembly is characterized by including a flow controller within the permeate pathway that provides a resistance that varies as a function of permeate flow.
The figures are not to scale and include idealized views to facilitate description. Where possible, like numerals have been used throughout the figures and written description to designate the same or similar features.
The present invention includes spiral wound modules (“elements”) suitable for use in reverse osmosis (RO) and nanofiltration (NF). Such modules include one or more RO or NF membrane envelops and feed spacer sheets wound around a permeate collection tube. RO membranes used to form envelops are relatively impermeable to virtually all dissolved salts and typically reject more than about 95% of salts having monovalent ions such as sodium chloride. RO membranes also typically reject more than about 95% of inorganic molecules as well as organic molecules with molecular weights greater than approximately 100 Daltons. NF membranes are more permeable than RO membranes and typically reject less than about 95% of salts having monovalent ions while rejecting more than about 50% (and often more than 90%) of salts having divalent ions—depending upon the species of divalent ion. NF membranes also typically reject particles in the nanometer range as well as organic molecules having molecular weights greater than approximately 200 to 500 Daltons.
A representative spiral wound filtration module is generally shown in
During module fabrication, permeate spacer sheets (12) may be attached about the circumference of the permeate collection tube (8) with membrane leaf packets interleaved there between. The back sides (36) of adjacently positioned membrane leaves (10, 10′) are sealed about portions of their periphery (16, 18, 20) to enclose the permeate spacer sheet (12) to form a membrane envelope (4). Suitable techniques for attaching the permeate spacer sheet to the permeate collection tube are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,538,642. The membrane envelope(s) (4) and feed spacer(s) (6) are wound or “rolled” concentrically about the permeate collection tube (8) to form two opposing scroll faces (30, 32) at opposing ends and the resulting spiral bundle is held in place, such as by tape or other means. The scroll faces of the (30, 32) may then be trimmed and a sealant may optionally be applied at the junction between the scroll face (30, 32) and permeate collection tube (8), as described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,951,295. Long glass fibers may be wound about the partially constructed module and resin (e.g. liquid epoxy) applied and hardened. In an alternative embodiment, tape may be applied upon the circumference of the wound module as described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,142,588. The ends of modules may be fitted with an anti-telescoping device or end cap (not shown) designed to prevent membrane envelopes from shifting under the pressure differential between the inlet and outlet scroll ends of the module. Representative examples are described in: U.S. Pat. No. 5,851,356, U.S. Pat. No. 6,224,767, U.S. Pat. No. 7,063,789 and U.S. Pat. No. 7,198,719. While not a required aspect of the invention, preferred embodiments of the invention include end caps which include a locking structure for preventing relative axial movement between engaged end caps. Such a locking structure between end caps may be engaged by aligning adjacent end caps so that one or more projections or catches extending radially inward from the inside of the outer hub of one end cap enter corresponding receptacles arranged about the outer hub of the facing end cap. The end caps are then engaged by rotating one end cap relative to the other until the projections or “catches” contact or “hook” with a corresponding structure of the receptacle. This type of locking end cap is available from The Dow Chemical Company under the iLEC™ mark and is further described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,632,356 and U.S. 2011/0042294. If such end caps are not used, interconnecting tubes (as shown in
Materials for constructing various components of spiral wound modules are well known in the art. Suitable sealants for sealing membrane envelopes include urethanes, epoxies, silicones, acrylates, hot melt adhesives and UV curable adhesives. While less common, other sealing means may also be used such as application of heat, pressure, ultrasonic welding and tape. Permeate collection tubes are typically made from plastic materials such as acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene, polyvinyl chloride, polysulfone, poly (phenylene oxide), polystyrene, polypropylene, polyethylene or the like. Tricot polyester materials are commonly used as permeate spacers. Additional permeate spacers are described in U.S. 2010/0006504. Representative feed spacers include polyethylene, polyester, and polypropylene mesh materials such as those commercially available under the trade name VEXAR™ from Conwed Plastics. Preferred feed spacers are described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,881,336.
The membrane sheet is not particularly limited and a wide variety of materials may he used, e.g. cellulose acetate materials, polysulfone, polyether sulfone, polyamides, polyvinylidene fluoride, etc. A preferred membrane sheet includes FilmTec Corporation's FT-30™ type membranes, i.e. a flat sheet composite membrane comprising a backing layer (back side) of a nonwoven backing web (e.g. a non-woven fabric such as polyester fiber fabric available from Awa Paper Company), a middle layer comprising a porous support having a typical thickness of about 25-125 μm and top discriminating layer (front side) comprising a thin film polyamide layer having a thickness typically less than about 1 micron, e.g. from 0.01 micron to 1 micron but more commonly from about 0.01 to 0.1 μm. The backing layer is not particularly limited but preferably comprises a non-woven fabric or fibrous web mat including fibers which may be orientated. Alternatively, a woven fabric such as sail cloth may be used. Representative examples are described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,214,994; U.S. Pat. No. 4,795,559; U.S. Pat. No. 5,435,957; U.S. Pat. No. 5,919,026; U.S. Pat. No. 6,156,680; U.S. 2008/0295951 and U.S. Pat. No. 7,048,855. The porous support is typically a polymeric material having pore sizes which are of sufficient size to permit essentially unrestricted passage of permeate but not large enough so as to interfere with the bridging over of a thin film polyamide layer formed thereon. For example, the pore size of the support preferably ranges from about 0.001 to 0.5 μm. Non-limiting examples of porous supports include those made of: polysulfone, polyether sulfone, polyimide, polyamide, polyetherimide, polyacrylonitrile, poly(methyl methacrylate), polyethylene, polypropylene, and various halogenated polymers such as polyvinylidene fluoride. The discriminating layer is preferably formed by an interfacial polycondensation reaction between a polyfunctional amine monomer and a polyfunctional acyl halide monomer upon the surface of the macroporous polymer layer as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,277,344 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,878,278.
Arrows shown in
While modules are available in a variety of sizes, one common industrial RO module is available with a standard 8 inch (20.3 cm) diameter and 40 inch (101.6 cm) length. For a typical 8 inch diameter module, 26 to 30 individual membrane envelopes are wound around the permeate collection tube (i.e. for permeate collection tubes having an outer diameter of from about 1.5 to 1.9 inches (3.8 cm-4.8)). Less conventional modules may also be used, including those described in U.S. 2011/023206 and WO 2012/058038.
The pressure vessels used in the present invention are not particularly limited but preferably include a solid structure capable of withstanding pressures associated with operating conditions. The vessel structure preferably includes a chamber having an inner periphery corresponding to that of the outer periphery of the spiral wound modules to be housed therein. The length of the chamber preferably corresponds to the combined length of the elements to be sequentially (axially) loaded, e.g. 2 to 8 elements, see U.S. 2007/0272628. The pressure vessel may also include one or more end plates that seal the chamber once loaded with modules. The vessel further includes at least one fluid inlet (feed) and two fluid outlets (concentrate and permeate), preferably located at opposite ends of the chamber. The orientation of the pressure vessel is not particularly limited, e.g. both horizontal and vertical orientations may be used. Examples of applicable pressure vessels, module arrangements and loading are described in: U.S. Pat. No. 6,074,595, U.S. Pat. No. 6,165,303, U.S. Pat. No. 6,299,772 and U.S. 2008/0308504. Manufacturers of pressure vessels include Pentair of Minneapolis Minn., Bekaert of Vista Calif. and Bel Composite of Beer Sheva, Israel.
A representative embodiment of the subject assembly is generally shown at 38 in
In a preferred embodiment, at least three modules are included within the assembly (38). While shown including only one feed (42), concentrate (44) and permeate (46) outlet, multiple outlets and inlets may be used. In a preferred embodiment, the inlet and outlets are positioned at locations adjacent the ends (48, 50) of the vessel (40). In another embodiment, the assembly (38) includes one feed inlet (42) and one concentration outlet (44) located at the ends (48, 50) of the vessel (40). Further preferred embodiments include removing permeate from only one end of the vessel (40). For purposes of clarity, the “ends” of the vessel includes those portions extending beyond the distal or axial ends of the modules positioned within the vessel. For example, the inlets and outlets may be position on the radial sides of a cylindrical vessel or at an axial position as illustrated in
A flow controller (54) is positioned along the permeate pathway and provides resistance that varies as a function of permeate flow, i.e. increasing resistance as permeate flow increases. “Resistance” (R) is defined as the ratio of pressure drop (Δp) to flow (F), i.e. R=Δp/F. Pressure drop across the flow controller (54) always increases monotonically with flow, but the resistance value is not a constant and can change with flow. The flow controller (54) increases resistance as flow (or pressure drop) across the flow controller (54) increases. In this way, flow across the flow controller can be maintained relatively constant in operation over a desired pressure range. Alternatively stated, the pressure drop can increase by a factor of two, four, oven even ten, with only a 10% change in flow. For example, a 5 GPM flow controller (e.g. model #2305-1141-3/4 available from O'Keefe Controls Co.) maintains flow within ±% 10 of the flow rating as pressure drop ranges between 1 and 10 bar. By retarding flow for modules upstream of the flow controller (54), flux imbalances between different modules within the vessel (40) is reduced. In a preferred embodiment, the flow controller includes a compliant member that can deform to cause greater resistance to flow at higher permeate flow rates or greater pressure drops across the flow controller. The flow controller can include an orifice that becomes partially obstructed or changes shape, i.e. narrowing as permeate flow increases and opening as permeate flow decreases.
Another suitable flow controller includes wafer type valves described at www.maric.com.au. The degree of pressure drop created by the flow controller may be optimized based upon the characteristics of the assembly, e.g. number of modules, quality of feed liquid, feed operating pressure, etc. In one preferred embodiment, the flow controller creates a drop in permeate pressure of at least 10 psi when the permeate flow rate upstream from the flow controller is 15 gfd*Area, wherein the “Area” is the total membrane area of membrane located upstream from the flow controller (54). The term “upstream” is defined in terms of the direction of permeate flow through the flow controller (54).
In the illustrated embodiment, a single flow controller (54) is shown located between the third and fifth module of the series. In preferred embodiments, the flow controller is located between the first (2′) and last (2″) module in the series. In embodiments including six modules like that shown, the flow controller is preferably located between the first (2′) and fifth module. In another embodiment, the flow controller (54) is located upstream of the third element. While shown at a single fixed location, the flow controller (54) may be selectively moved along the permeate pathway by conventional means, see for example U.S. Pat. No. 7,410,581. While not shown, the assembly (38) may include a plurality of flow controllers spaced along the permeate pathway, each providing a successive pressure drop.
Many embodiments of the invention have been described and in some instances certain embodiments, selections, ranges, constituents, or other features have been characterized as being “preferred.” Such designations of “preferred” features should in no way be interpreted as an essential or critical aspect of the invention. It will be appreciated that multiple seal assemblies may be used per element or within a spiral wound assembly include multiple elements.
The entire content of each of the aforementioned patents and patent applications are incorporated herein by reference.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/US2014/034061 | 4/15/2014 | WO | 00 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61816186 | Apr 2013 | US |
