This application is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/606,401, filed Jun. 25, 2003 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,297,166 issued Nov. 20, 2007). Cross reference is also made to U.S. application Ser. No. 10/606,303, filed Jun. 25, 2003 and entitled “MODULAR TAPERED REAMER FOR BONE PREPARATION AND ASSOCIATED METHOD”, (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,074,224 issued Jul. 11, 2006) and to U.S. application Ser. No. 10/606,304, filed Jun. 25, 2003 and entitled “NON-LINEAR REAMER FOR BONE PREPARATION AND ASSOCIATED METHOD” (now abandoned), the disclosures of which are hereby totally incorporated by reference in their entirety.
The present invention relates generally to the field of orthopaedics, and more particularly, to an implant for use in arthroplasty.
Patients who suffer from the pain and immobility caused by osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis have an option of joint replacement surgery. Joint replacement surgery is quite common and enables many individuals to function properly when it would not be otherwise possible to do so. Artificial joints are usually comprised of metal, ceramic and/or plastic components that are fixed to existing bone.
Such joint replacement surgery is otherwise known as joint arthroplasty. Joint arthroplasty is a well-known surgical procedure by which a diseased and/or damaged joint is replaced with a prosthetic joint. In a typical total joint arthroplasty, the ends or distal portions of the bones adjacent to the joint are resected or a portion of the distal part of the bone is removed and the artificial joint is secured thereto.
There are known to exist many designs and methods for manufacturing implantable articles, such as bone prostheses. Such bone prostheses include components of artificial joints such as elbows, hips, knees and shoulders.
During performance of a joint replacement procedure, it is generally necessary to provide the surgeon with a certain degree of flexibility in the selection of a prosthesis. In particular, the anatomy of the bone into which the prosthesis is to be implanted may vary somewhat from patient to patient. Such variations may be due to, for example, the patient's age, size and gender. For example, in the case of a femoral prosthesis, the patient's femur may be relatively long or relatively short thereby requiring use of a femoral prosthesis which includes a stem that is relatively long or short, respectively. Moreover, in certain cases, such as when use of a relatively long stem length is required, the stem must also be bowed in order to conform to the anatomy of the patient's femoral canal.
Such a need for prostheses of varying shapes and sizes thus creates a number of problems in regard to the use of a one-piece prosthesis. For example, a hospital or surgery center must maintain a relatively large inventory of prostheses in order to have the requisite mix of prostheses needed for certain situations, such as trauma situations and revision surgery. Moreover, since the bow of the stem must conform to the bow of the intramedullary canal of the patient's femur rotational positioning of the upper portion of the prosthesis is limited thereby rendering precise location of the upper portion and hence the head of the prosthesis very difficult. In addition, since corresponding bones of the left and right side of a patient's anatomy (e.g. left and right femur) may bow in opposite directions, it is necessary to provide (left) and (right) variations of the prosthesis in order to provide anteversion of the bone stem, thereby further increasing the inventory of prostheses which must be maintained.
As a result of these and other drawbacks, a number of modular prostheses have been designed. As its name implies, a modular prosthesis is constructed in modular form so that the individual elements or figures of the prosthesis can be selected to fit the needs of a given patient's anatomy. For example, modular prostheses have been designed which include a proximal neck component which can be assembled to any one of numerous distal stem components in order to create an assembly which fits the needs of a given patient's anatomy. Such a design allows the distal stem component to be selected and thereafter implanted in the patient's bone in a position which conforms to the patient's anatomy while also allowing for a limited degree of independent positioning of the proximal neck component relative to the patient's pelvis.
One issue that arises as a result of the use of a modular prosthesis is the locking of the components relative to one another. In particular, firm reproducible locking of the proximal neck component to the distal stem component is critical to prevent separation of the two components subsequent to implantation thereof into the patient. The need for the firm locking is particularly necessary if the design does not provide for positive locking with weight bearing. As such, a number of locking mechanisms have heretofore been designed to lock the components of a modular prosthesis to one another. For example, a number of modular prostheses have heretofore been designed to include a distal stem component which has an upwardly extending post which is received into a bore defined distal neck component. A relatively long fastener such as a screw or bolt is utilized to secure the post with the bore. Other methods of securing modular components include the impacting of one component onto the other. This method has highly variable results.
Current designs of modular stems include designs in which the modular connection utilizes a tapered fit between the two components. For example, the proximal body may include an internal taper which mates with an external taper on the distal stem. Such a taper connection may be used in conjunction with additional securing means, for example, a threaded connection or may be used alone. It is important that the tapered connection be secure. For example, the proper amount of force must be applied to the tapered connection to properly secure the tapered connection so that the connection can withstand the forces associated with the operation of the stem.
Current attempts to provide a device to adjoin components of a modular joint prosthesis are fraught with several problems. For example, the device may not provide sufficient mechanical advantage to securely lock the components. Further, the ergonomics available to lock the components may not be optimal. Further, a device relying solely on the displacement for a taper connection may not provide sufficient force as there may not be an accurate correspondence of displacement to the clamping force. Further, utilizing a displacement method may make it possible to overtighten and damage the components. Further, prior art solutions may be difficult to manufacture or expensive to make. Further prior art devices may be unsuitable for disconnecting the components. There is thus a need to provide for a assembly and disassembly tool capable of alleviating at least some of the aforementioned problems.
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/327,187 entitled “ADJUSTABLE BIOMECHANICAL TEMPLATING & RESECTION INSTRUMENT AND ASSOCIATED METHOD”, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/327,196 entitled “ALIGNMENT DEVICE FOR MODULAR IMPLANTS AND METHOD” and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/327,527 entitled “INSTRUMENT AND ASSOCIATED METHOD OF TRIALING FOR MODULAR HIP STEMS” are hereby incorporated in their entireties by reference.
According to the present invention, a device is provided for two components of a modular joint prosthesis. The device is particularly well-suited for assembling the proximal stem component to the distal stem component of a modular prosthetic joint stem, such as one for a hip prosthesis. The instrument has a portion that engages, for example, the proximal component and another component that engages the distal component. The instrument applies force on the proximal component and an opposing force on the distal component. For example, the instrument may threadably engage the proximal aspect of the distal stem and apply an opposing force on the proximal shoulder of the proximal body.
The first component of the instrument is caused to rotate with respect to the second component of the instrument. A handle is rotated about the central axis that conveys rotary motion into axial displacement. The axial displacement serves to thereby lock and unlock the taper joining the distal component to the proximal component. The instrument may be designed to yield a specific axial displacement, which is previously determined based upon the specific taper geometry of the implant.
In an embodiment of the present invention, a coupling device threadably engages with the proximal aspect of the distal stem. A counterface contacts the proximal aspect or shoulder of the proximal body in order to provide opposing forces which axially displace the two components relative to each other, thus locking and unlocking the tapered connection. The instrument may be actuated by rotating one handle with respect to the body or another handle. The handle may, for example, travel in a slot, angled relative to the axis of the cylinder, thereby providing axial motion. In other embodiments of the present invention, a standard thread and bolt connection between the first component and the second component provide for the axial motion.
According to one embodiment of the present invention, there is provided an assembly tool for assembly of a first component of a prosthesis to a second component of the prosthesis for use in joint arthroplasty. The tool includes a first member operably associated with the first component. The first member defines a first member longitudinal axis of the first member. The tool also includes a second member operably associated with the second component. The second member defines a second member longitudinal axis of the second member. The second member is adapted to provide relative motion of the second member with respect to the first member when the second member is rotated relative to the first member about the second member longitudinal axis.
According to another embodiment of the present invention there is provided an assembly tool for assembly of a first component of a prosthesis to a second component of the prosthesis for use in joint arthroplasty. The tool includes a first member operably associated with the first component. The first member defines a first member longitudinal axis of the first member. The first member includes a first member relative motion feature and a body defining a generally cylindrical longitudinal opening in the body. The tool also includes a second member operably associated with the second component. The second member has a portion of the second member matingly fitted to the cylindrical longitudinal opening of the first member. The second member defines a second member longitudinal axis of the second member. The second member is adapted to provide relative motion of the second member with respect to the first member along the longitudinal axis of the second member when the second member is rotated relative to the first member about the second member longitudinal axis. The second member includes a second member relative motion feature. The first member relative motion feature and the second member relative motion feature cooperate with each other to provide the relative motion of the first member with respect to the second member. The relative motion of the second member with respect to the first member corresponds to the relative motion of the first component with respect to the second component to urge the second component into engagement with the first component.
According to another embodiment of the present invention there is provided a kit for use in joint arthroplasty. The kit includes an implant for implantation at least partially in the medullary canal of a long bone. The implant has a first component and a second component removably attachable to the first component. The kit also includes an assembly tool including a first member operably associated with the first component. The first member defines a first member longitudinal axis of the first member and a second member operably associated with the second component. The second member defines a second member longitudinal axis of the second member. The second member is adapted to provide relative motion of the second member with respect to the first member when the second member is rotated relative to the first member about the second member longitudinal axis.
According to a further embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a method for providing joint arthroplasty. The method includes the steps of providing a prosthesis including a first component and a second component removably attachable to the first component, providing a instrument having a first member and a second member rotatably moveable with respect to the first member in a plane perpendicular with the first member, the first member cooperable with the first component and the second member cooperable with the second component, assembling the first component to the second component, connecting the first member of the tool to the first component, connecting the second member of the tool to the second component, and rotating the first member of the tool with respect to the second member of the tool to secure the first component to the second component.
The technical advantages of the present invention include the ability of the device to provide sufficient mechanical advantage to properly secure the components to form a secured joint. For example, according to one aspect of the present invention, the first component is joined to the second component by a threaded connection. By changing the pitch of the threadable connection, the mechanical advantage can be increased to provide for a sufficient mechanical advantage.
For example, according to yet another aspect of the present invention, the first component and the second component have outwardly extending handles. The handles may have any suitable length and may be made longer to provide for additional mechanical advantage. Thus the present invention provides for sufficient mechanical advantage to properly secure the prosthesis.
Another technical advantage of the present invention is the ability of the device to provide for optimum ergonomics. For example, according to one aspect of the present invention, the device is held and actuated by opposed extending handles which may be easily gripped by the surgeon and rotated relative to each other to secure the joint. Thus, the present invention provides for simple optimum ergonomics.
Yet another technical advantage of the present invention includes the ability of the device to provide for a measurement of forces in addition to the measurement of displacement. Due to frictional forces and additional complications, displacements of the device do not always directly lineally correspond to the forces that may be applied by the device. Therefore, there is an advantage to be able to measure the force applied by the device in addition to the displacement of the device. For example, according to another aspect of the present invention, a handle of the device may include a torque measuring feature which may be used to measure the torque applied to the device. Alternatively or in addition thereto, the device may include a force washer or other force transducers along the axial body of the instrument in order that the forces applied may be directly measured.
Another technical advantage of the present invention includes the ability of the device to limit the displacement of the instrument and therefore to limit the force applied to the prosthesis. If excessive force is applied to the prosthesis it is possible to overtighten and damage the component. For example, according to one aspect of the present invention, the displacement is physically limited by a helical opening of limited length or by a limited amount of threaded engagement between the two components. It is also possible to provide for a device with a break-away torque limiter that limits the amount of torque that the device may apply. Thus, the present invention provides for an ability to avoid overtightening of the prosthesis components.
Another technical advantage of the present invention is its simple and inexpensive design. For example, according to one aspect of the present invention, the device includes a cylindrical tube and a rod which slidably fits within the cylindrical tube. The tube and rod are threadably connected so that when one component is rotated with respect to the other one, the one component moves axially relative to the other one providing for a simple, inexpensive way of utilizing a device to disassemble or assemble a component.
An additional advantage of the present invention includes the ability of the device to be utilized simply and easily to disconnect as well as to connect the components of a modular prosthesis. For example, according to one aspect of the present invention, a component may be placed onto the assembly device to provide for connecting features to disassemble the device. Thus, the present invention provides for a simple and quick way of being utilized to disassemble as well as to assemble a prosthesis.
Other technical advantages of the present invention will be readily apparent to one skilled in the art from the following figures, descriptions and claims.
For a more complete understanding of the present invention and the advantages thereof, reference is now made to the following description taken in connection with the accompanying drawings, in which:
Embodiments of the present invention and the advantages thereof are best understood by referring to the following descriptions and drawings, wherein like numerals are used for like and corresponding parts of the drawings.
According to the present invention and referring now to
The assembly tool 1 is suited for use with the prosthesis 4 when, for example, the prosthesis 4 includes the first component 2 and the second component 6 which are engaged and disengaged by relative motions along an axis. For example, the assembly tool 1 is suitable when the prosthesis 4 includes components which are connected by a tapered connection. For example, as shown in
As shown in
For simplicity, since the first member 8 and the first component 2 are merely required to prevent motion of the two components toward each other, the first member 8 and the first component 2 may be designed such that the first member operating feature 24 may be in the form of a bottom and/or surface. Similarly, the first component operating feature 26 may be in the form of a top surface of the first component 2.
The second member operating feature 28 and the second component operating feature 30 may be any features capable of urging the second component 6 upwardly in the direction of arrow 22. For example, for simplicity, the second member operating feature 28 may be in the form of internal threads formed on the second component operating feature 26, which may mate with external threads 30 formed on the second component 6.
The first member 8 and the second member 12 may have any shape or configuration capable of providing relative motion along first member longitudinal axis 10 and second member longitudinal axis 14. For example, and as shown in
In order to move the second component 6 into engagement with the first component 2, it should be appreciated that the second member 12 must move in the direction of arrow 34 with respect to the first member 8. In order to provide relative motion between the second member 12 and the first member 8, as shown in
As shown in
The relative motion feature 42 may also include a second member relative motion feature 48. Second member relative motion feature 48 may be in the form of, for example, external threads formed on rod portion 36 of the second member 12. The threads 44 and 48 cooperate to provide the relative motion of the second member 12 in the direction of arrow 34 with respect to the first member 8. The threads 44 and 48 are matingly engaged and have a pitch selected to provide for the desired mechanical advantage.
Preferably and as shown in
It should be appreciated that in order to move the second member 12 in the direction of arrow 34 with respect to the first member 8, the second member 12 must be rotated in the direction of arrow 56 with respect to first member 8. This motion assembles the components 2 and 6. Similarly, it should be appreciated that in order for the second member 12 to move in the direction of arrow 39 with respect to the first member 8, the second member 12 must be rotated in the direction of arrow 60 with respect to the first member 8. This motion disassembles the components 2 and 6.
To provide the sufficient torque or mechanical advantage for rotating the second member 12 in the direction of arrow 56 and 60, it should be appreciated that the second member 12 may include a second member handle 62 extending outwardly from the rod portion 36 of the second member 12. Similarly, it should be appreciated that to resist the force applied by the second member handle 62, the first member 8 may similarly include a first member handle 64 extending outwardly from the tubular portion 40 of the first member 8. The handles 62 and 64 may have any suitable size and shape capable of receiving for example the hands of the surgeon or operator of the assembly tool 1.
It should be appreciated that the assembly tool 1 may likewise be utilized to disassemble the first component 2 from the second component 6. It should be appreciated that the assembly tool 1 may be adapted for use for the disassembly of the first component 2 from the second component 6. It should be appreciated that one of the first member 8 and the second member 12 may be associated with one of the first component 2 and the second component 6 such that as the first member 8 is moved relative to the second member 12, the first component 2 may be disassembled from the second component 6. To accomplish this, one of the first member 8 and the second member 12 is operably associated with the first component 2 while the other of the first member 8 and the second member 12 is operably associated with the second component 6.
For example, and as shown in
In order that the second component 6 may be forced to move in the direction of arrow 63 while the first component 2 is required to move in the direction of arrow 65, the first component 2 must be restrained by the first member 8. The first component 2 is held against the first member 8 by, for example, a third member 66.
The third member 66 cooperates with the first member 8 and the first component 2 to hold the two components against each other. The third member 66 may cooperate with the first member 8 and the first component 2 in any suitable fashion. For example, the first member 8 may include a first member disassembly operating feature 68 which cooperates with the third member 66. Similarly, the first component 2 may include a first component disassembly operating feature 70 which cooperates with the third member 66.
The third member 66 may have any suitable design or shape and may, for example, be in the form of first fork 72 and second fork 74. The forks 72 and 74 may be urged together by, for example, springs 76. The first fork 72 may include a first tine 78 which engages with the first member disassembly operating feature 68 in the form of, for example, a first member groove. Similarly, the first fork 72 may include a second tine 80 for cooperation with the first component operating disassembly feature 70 in the form of, for example, a second component groove. The second fork 74 may include a first tine 82 for cooperation with the first member groove 68 as well as a second tine 84 for engagement with the second groove 70.
When utilizing the assembly tool 1 to assemble the first component 2 to the second component 6 the third member 66 is not used. The assembly tool 1 is positioned with respect to the prosthesis 4 such that the internal threads 28 of the second member 12 engage the external threads 30 of the second component 6. The internal threads 28 and the external threads 30 are threaded into engagement with each other and the second member 12 is rotated with respect to the second component 6 until the bottom end surface 24 of the first member 8 is in contact with the top surface 26 of the first component 2. At this point, the second member handle 62 is rotated in the direction of arrow 56 until the second member handle has come to the stop created by the relative motion feature 42.
When utilizing the assembly tool 1 to disassemble the first component 2 from the second component 6 the third member 66 is utilized and placed in position on the assembly tool 1. The forks 72 and 74 of the third member 66 are placed in position in the first member grooves 68 and the first component grooves 70. The top surface 26 of the first component 2 is thus in contact with the bottom end surface 24 of the first member 8. The second component 6 is then threadably engaged into the second member 12. The second member handle 62 is then rotated in the direction of arrow 60 until the relative motion feature 42 ends the movement of the second member handle 62 thereby disassembling the first component 2 from the second component 6.
Referring now to
The assembly tool 100 may be configured such that the relative motion of the second member 112 with respect to the first member 108 corresponds to the relative motion of the first component 2 with respect to the second component 6 to urge the second component 6 into engagement with the first component 2.
Referring now to
Since the first member 108 is in contact with the first component 2 as the first component moves in the direction of arrow 122 relative to the first component 2, the second member 112, which threadably secured to the second component 6 moves in the direction of arrow 134 relative to the first member 108. Thus, the relative motion of the second member 112 with respect to the first member 108 in the direction of arrow 134 corresponds to the relative motion of the second component 6 with respect to the first component 2 in the direction of arrow 122.
Referring now to
It should be appreciated that the prosthesis for use with the assembly tool 1 or 100 of
Again referring to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
The relative motion of the first member 108 with respect to the second member 112 may be accomplished by, for example, a relative motion feature 142. The relative motion feature 142 may include a first member relative location feature 144 in the form of slot 144 within which a second member relative motion feature 148 in the form of, for example, a pin is rollably restrained with the slot 144. The relative motion feature 142 is utilized to move the second member 112 about the second member longitudinal axis 114 with respect to the first member 108.
Referring now to
As shown in
A slot length angle θ defines the arcuate difference from first member centerline 110 along slot radius R of the first member 108 between the first centerline 151 and the second centerline 153. The angle θ preferably selected to provide for the proper displacement of the assembly tool 100. The proper displacement of the assembly tool 100 may be predetermined by calculating the desired locking force on the joint of the prosthesis 2.
Referring to
The dimensions of the relative motion feature 142 may be properly selected by using the formula below:
DI=(θ/360)×π×2R×Tan α
Where:
θ=the angular arm displacement in radians
R=the slot 144 radius from centerline 110 in inches
DI=the displacement in inches.
α=the ramp angle in degrees.
Referring now to
Referring again to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring again to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring again to
The lower sleeve 186 may be connected to the upper sleeve 188 in any suitable manner, for example, by welding, by press fit, or as shown in
Similarly, the second member 112 may be made of a modular or multi-piece construction. For example, the second member 112 may include a rod portion 136 removably connected to a cap 152. The rod portion 136 may be secured to the cap 152 in any suitable fashion. For example, the cap 152 may be welded to the rod portion 136, or be press fitted thereto. Alternatively, and as shown in
Continuing to refer to
Referring now to
The assembly tool 500 includes an actuating arm 562 identical to the actuating arm 162 of the tool assembly 100. The assembly tool 500 further includes a restraining arm 561 identical to the restraining arm 162 of assembly tool 100, except that the arm extension 161 of the restraining arm 162 is moved from first arm stem 564 to second arm stem 563. The assembly tool 500 includes a slot 544 identical to the slot 144 of the assembly tool 100. Pin 548, identical to pin 148 of the assembly tool 100, slidably fits within the slot 548.
Referring now to
When disassembling the prosthesis for utilizing the assembly tool 500, the location pins 580 and 582 are engaged in the holes 70 of the proximal body 2 of the prosthesis 4. Internal threads 528 of the second member 508 are then threadably engaged into the external threads 30 of the distal stem 6 of the prosthesis 4. The second member 512 is then continually tightened until the second member 512 is finger tight to the distal stem 6. The pins 580 and 584 are moved from the proximal body 2 by first moving the arms 572 and 574 in the direction of arrows 581 by means of the operator's fingers. When in position the arms 572 and 574 are released so that the pins 580 and 584 may be properly engaged in the holes 70 of the proximal body 2 of the prosthesis 4.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring again to
Assembly tools 1, 100 and 500 as shown in
Referring now to
The method 800 may further include a third step 806 of assembling the first component to the second component and a fourth step 808 of connecting the first member of the tool to the first component. The method 800 may further include a fifth step 810 of connecting the second member of the tool to the second component and a sixth step 812 of rotating the first member of the tool with respect to the second member of the tool to secure the second component to the first component.
Although the present invention and its advantages have been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions, and alterations can be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
650795 | Maxwell et al. | May 1900 | A |
1029402 | Ritter | Jun 1912 | A |
1383304 | Hughes et al. | Jul 1921 | A |
1423649 | Daniel | Jul 1922 | A |
1534692 | Davis | Apr 1925 | A |
2631584 | Purificato | Mar 1953 | A |
2661033 | Daniel | Dec 1953 | A |
2711196 | Daniel | Jun 1955 | A |
2834382 | Daniel | May 1958 | A |
2856637 | Daniel | Oct 1958 | A |
2864282 | Daniel | Dec 1958 | A |
2877936 | Michel | Mar 1959 | A |
2895154 | Belcher | Jul 1959 | A |
2902596 | Rockwell et al. | Sep 1959 | A |
2914224 | Michel | Nov 1959 | A |
2944373 | Mentley et al. | Jul 1960 | A |
2955905 | Davies et al. | Oct 1960 | A |
2957610 | Michel | Oct 1960 | A |
2974699 | Boles et al. | Mar 1961 | A |
2975944 | Michel | Mar 1961 | A |
2977726 | Daniel | Apr 1961 | A |
2981035 | Mentley et al. | Apr 1961 | A |
2994461 | Michel | Aug 1961 | A |
2994988 | Mentley et al. | Aug 1961 | A |
3048307 | Michel | Aug 1962 | A |
3059278 | Daniel | Oct 1962 | A |
3071862 | Daniel et al. | Jan 1963 | A |
3077877 | Daniel et al. | Feb 1963 | A |
3092934 | Daniel | Jun 1963 | A |
3092935 | Daniel | Jun 1963 | A |
3101875 | Michel | Aug 1963 | A |
3135136 | Mentley et al. | Jun 1964 | A |
3177507 | Becker et al. | Apr 1965 | A |
3180532 | Michel | Apr 1965 | A |
3220311 | Anthony et al. | Nov 1965 | A |
3250745 | Davis et al. | May 1966 | A |
3293987 | Daniel | Dec 1966 | A |
3300833 | Daniel | Jan 1967 | A |
3301134 | Daniel | Jan 1967 | A |
3319526 | Daniel et al. | May 1967 | A |
3331115 | Daniel | Jul 1967 | A |
3335639 | Daniel | Aug 1967 | A |
3424783 | Harper et al. | Jan 1969 | A |
3443478 | Daniel | May 1969 | A |
3451111 | Daniel | Jun 1969 | A |
3479387 | Daniels et al. | Nov 1969 | A |
3479388 | Daniels | Nov 1969 | A |
3483175 | Harper et al. | Dec 1969 | A |
3494752 | Daniel | Feb 1970 | A |
3499920 | Daniels | Mar 1970 | A |
3541868 | Hall | Nov 1970 | A |
3580027 | Daniel et al. | May 1971 | A |
3580029 | Daniel et al. | May 1971 | A |
3604235 | Motz et al. | Sep 1971 | A |
3629981 | McCaffery | Dec 1971 | A |
3631703 | Bregi et al. | Jan 1972 | A |
3633583 | Fishbein | Jan 1972 | A |
3668139 | Daniels et al. | Jun 1972 | A |
3673887 | Daniel et al. | Jul 1972 | A |
3679728 | Morgan et al. | Jul 1972 | A |
3679729 | Daniels | Jul 1972 | A |
3691718 | Woodruff et al. | Sep 1972 | A |
3700957 | Daniels | Oct 1972 | A |
3705513 | Daniel | Dec 1972 | A |
3754586 | Daniels | Aug 1973 | A |
3810312 | Carson | May 1974 | A |
3849322 | Wendler et al. | Nov 1974 | A |
3869394 | Daniels et al. | Mar 1975 | A |
3889558 | Duncan | Jun 1975 | A |
3912727 | Daniels | Oct 1975 | A |
4004581 | Heimke et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
4009712 | Burstein et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4035988 | Daniels | Jul 1977 | A |
4051559 | Pifferi | Oct 1977 | A |
D246507 | Danielson | Nov 1977 | S |
4115875 | Rambert et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4116200 | Braun et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4150909 | Hibarger et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
D257533 | Bevilacqua et al. | Nov 1980 | S |
D258957 | Bevilacqua et al. | Apr 1981 | S |
4305394 | Bertuch, Jr. | Dec 1981 | A |
D266768 | Bevilacqua et al. | Nov 1982 | S |
D267151 | Bruce et al. | Dec 1982 | S |
4398074 | Danielson et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
D275006 | Danielson et al. | Aug 1984 | S |
4473070 | Matthews et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
D282246 | Thomas et al. | Jan 1986 | S |
D282350 | Thomas et al. | Jan 1986 | S |
4601289 | Chiarizzio et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
D285073 | Danielson et al. | Aug 1986 | S |
D285198 | Danielson et al. | Aug 1986 | S |
4608055 | Morrey et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
D286198 | Bancroft | Oct 1986 | S |
D286285 | Danielson et al. | Oct 1986 | S |
D287494 | Danielson et al. | Dec 1986 | S |
D289155 | Brooks et al. | Apr 1987 | S |
4658808 | Link | Apr 1987 | A |
D290399 | Kitchens | Jun 1987 | S |
4670015 | Freeman | Jun 1987 | A |
4686971 | Harris et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4710946 | Hinch et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4716894 | Lazzeri et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4738256 | Freeman et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4777942 | Frey et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
D303114 | Danielson et al. | Aug 1989 | S |
D304587 | Danielson et al. | Nov 1989 | S |
4891545 | Capek et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4917530 | Engelhardt et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4923422 | Capek et al. | May 1990 | A |
4938773 | Strand | Jul 1990 | A |
4959066 | Dunn et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4969911 | Greene | Nov 1990 | A |
D313233 | Andrews, Sr. et al. | Dec 1990 | S |
D315343 | Andrews et al. | Mar 1991 | S |
4997621 | Johansson et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5002578 | Luman | Mar 1991 | A |
5002581 | Paxson et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5015255 | Kuslich | May 1991 | A |
5020519 | Hayes et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
D318051 | Danielson et al. | Jul 1991 | S |
D319439 | Danielson et al. | Aug 1991 | S |
5047033 | Fallin | Sep 1991 | A |
5049150 | Cozad | Sep 1991 | A |
D320985 | Danielson et al. | Oct 1991 | S |
5053037 | Lackey | Oct 1991 | A |
5060505 | Tury et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5080685 | Bolesky et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
D323657 | Danielson et al. | Feb 1992 | S |
5099714 | Hutchison et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5100407 | Conrad et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5108452 | Fallin et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5133588 | Hutchison et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5135529 | Paxson et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5162626 | Hutchison et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5171055 | Hutchison et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5171244 | Caspari et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5181928 | Bolesky et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5184017 | Tury et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5192283 | Ling et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5197989 | Hinckfuss et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5201882 | Paxson | Apr 1993 | A |
5207680 | Dietz et al. | May 1993 | A |
5218814 | Teal et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
D337639 | Beckman | Jul 1993 | S |
5228459 | Caspari et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
D338473 | Patterson et al. | Aug 1993 | S |
5238267 | Hutchison et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5247171 | Wlodarczyk et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
D340461 | Patterson et al. | Oct 1993 | S |
5263498 | Caspari et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5290313 | Heldreth | Mar 1994 | A |
5304181 | Caspari et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
D346979 | Stalcup et al. | May 1994 | S |
5331124 | Danielson | Jul 1994 | A |
5336226 | McDaniel et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5342363 | Richelsoph | Aug 1994 | A |
5344423 | Dietz et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5345483 | Johansson et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5352231 | Brumfield et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
D352521 | Sculler et al. | Nov 1994 | S |
D353394 | Stefanski et al. | Dec 1994 | S |
5370706 | Bolesky et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5372209 | Raihert et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
D355186 | Danielson et al. | Feb 1995 | S |
D355187 | Danielson et al. | Feb 1995 | S |
5387218 | Meswania | Feb 1995 | A |
5395376 | Caspari et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
D357315 | Dietz | Apr 1995 | S |
5403320 | Luman et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5409492 | Jones et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5415659 | Lee et al. | May 1995 | A |
5420910 | Rudokas et al. | May 1995 | A |
D359064 | Sculler et al. | Jun 1995 | S |
5422478 | Wlodarczyk et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5457100 | Daniel | Oct 1995 | A |
5459294 | Danielson | Oct 1995 | A |
D364621 | Clarke et al. | Nov 1995 | S |
5468243 | Halpern | Nov 1995 | A |
5470336 | Ling et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5474559 | Bertin et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5476466 | Barrette et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
D365824 | Danielson et al. | Jan 1996 | S |
5486180 | Dietz et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5496324 | Barnes | Mar 1996 | A |
5507815 | Wagner et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5507824 | Lennox | Apr 1996 | A |
5507830 | DeMane et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5507833 | Bohn | Apr 1996 | A |
5527316 | Stone et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5528640 | Johansson et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5534005 | Tokish, Jr. et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5540694 | DeCarlo, Jr. et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5555551 | Rudokas et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5569255 | Burke | Oct 1996 | A |
D376527 | Apolinski et al. | Dec 1996 | S |
5591233 | Kelman et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5593411 | Stalcup et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5600892 | Peugh et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5601563 | Burke et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5601567 | Swajger et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5607269 | Dowd et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5607431 | Dudasik et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
D379578 | Daniels | Jun 1997 | S |
5643271 | Sederholm et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5645607 | Hickey | Jul 1997 | A |
5653714 | Dietz et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5653764 | Murphy | Aug 1997 | A |
5653765 | McTighe et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5658349 | Brooks et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5663993 | Danielson et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5669812 | Schockemoehl et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5683395 | Mikhail | Nov 1997 | A |
D387962 | Apolinski et al. | Dec 1997 | S |
D387963 | Clark | Dec 1997 | S |
5697932 | Smith et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5702480 | Kropf et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5702487 | Averill et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5715672 | Schockemoehl et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
D392534 | Degen et al. | Mar 1998 | S |
D392866 | Degen et al. | Mar 1998 | S |
5725592 | White et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5728128 | Crickenberger et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5735857 | Lane | Apr 1998 | A |
5743915 | Bertin et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5752972 | Hoogeboom | May 1998 | A |
5755803 | Haines et al. | May 1998 | A |
5766261 | Neal et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5769855 | Bertin et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5776200 | Johnson et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5782921 | Colleran et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5792143 | Samuelson et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5804886 | Danielson et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5810827 | Haines et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5810829 | Elliott et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5810830 | Noble et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5824097 | Gabriel et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5849015 | Haywood et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5850162 | Danielsons | Dec 1998 | A |
5853415 | Bertin et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5858020 | Johnson et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5858828 | Seliskar et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5860969 | White et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5860981 | Bertin et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5876459 | Powell | Mar 1999 | A |
5879354 | Haines et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5879391 | Slamin | Mar 1999 | A |
5902340 | White et al. | May 1999 | A |
5906644 | Powell | May 1999 | A |
5908423 | Kashuba et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5919195 | Wilson et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5923422 | Keens et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5935172 | Ochoa et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5950121 | Kaminsky et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5951606 | Burke | Sep 1999 | A |
5954460 | Degen et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5957768 | Schockemoehl et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5957925 | Cook et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5966599 | Walker et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5968049 | Da Rold | Oct 1999 | A |
5973064 | Zhao et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5976145 | Kennefick, III | Nov 1999 | A |
5976147 | LaSalle et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5976188 | Dextradeur et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5993455 | Noble | Nov 1999 | A |
5996812 | Sokol, Jr. | Dec 1999 | A |
5997419 | Daniels et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6045556 | Cohen | Apr 2000 | A |
6048365 | Burrows et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6054895 | Danielsons et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6056084 | Schockemoehl et al. | May 2000 | A |
6056754 | Haines et al. | May 2000 | A |
6058301 | Daniels | May 2000 | A |
6059528 | Danielson et al. | May 2000 | A |
6063123 | Burrows et al. | May 2000 | A |
6069048 | Daniel | May 2000 | A |
6071311 | O'Neil et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6077783 | Allman et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6080162 | Dye et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6090146 | Rozow, III et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6096625 | Daniels et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6117138 | Burrows et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6120507 | Allard et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6121147 | Daniel et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6126694 | Gray, Jr. | Oct 2000 | A |
6139581 | Engh et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6159214 | Michelson | Dec 2000 | A |
6162226 | DeCarlo, Jr. et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6165177 | Wilson et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6179116 | Noniewicz et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6179877 | Burke | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181925 | Kaminsky et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185416 | Rudokas et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6193759 | Ro et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6197064 | Haines et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6197065 | Martin et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6201253 | Allman et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206884 | Masini | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6219538 | Kaminsky et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6224605 | Anderson et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6232721 | Danielsons | May 2001 | B1 |
6235590 | Daniel et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6238435 | Meulink et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
D443882 | Daniels et al. | Jun 2001 | S |
6241847 | Allman et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6242978 | Danielsons | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6258093 | Edwards et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6258095 | Lombardo et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6258097 | Cook et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6260279 | Apolinski et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6263998 | Schockemoehl et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6264699 | Noiles et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6270502 | Stulberg | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6281935 | Twitchell et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6285871 | Daniels | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6287342 | Copf et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6310410 | Lin et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
D450304 | Daniels et al. | Nov 2001 | S |
6316817 | Seliskar et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6318651 | Spiering | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6319286 | Fernandez et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6330845 | Meulink | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6332886 | Green et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6335766 | Twitchell et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6354908 | Allman et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6355068 | Doubler et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6355532 | Seliskar et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6361563 | Terrill-Grisoni et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6366422 | Daniel et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6372520 | Hsia et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
D457176 | Daniels et al. | May 2002 | S |
6382276 | Daniels et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
D458947 | Svetlik et al. | Jun 2002 | S |
6400415 | Danielsons | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6406217 | Daniel et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6419147 | Daniel | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6422562 | Daniel | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6422816 | Danielson | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6428578 | White | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6432110 | Richelsoph | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6432141 | Stocks et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6440139 | Michelson | Aug 2002 | B2 |
D467485 | Daniels et al. | Dec 2002 | S |
6488713 | Hershberger | Dec 2002 | B1 |
D468180 | Bruno et al. | Jan 2003 | S |
6505684 | Rayssiguier et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6508841 | Martin et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
D469671 | Prell et al. | Feb 2003 | S |
6517581 | Blarney | Feb 2003 | B2 |
RE38058 | Fallin | Apr 2003 | E |
6565029 | Zweighaft et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6568618 | Vanderheyden et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6589284 | Silberer | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6589285 | Penenberg | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6600516 | Danielsons et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6609900 | Lucke et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6663616 | Roth et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6676706 | Mears et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6682568 | Despres, III et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6692530 | Doubler et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6700359 | Daniels et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6702854 | Cheal et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6706072 | Dwyer et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6706621 | Cox et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6723129 | Dwyer et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6740090 | Cragg et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6743235 | Subba Rao | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6744243 | Daniels et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6751266 | Danielsons | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6770100 | Draenert | Aug 2004 | B2 |
D497499 | Daniel et al. | Oct 2004 | S |
6811376 | Arel et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6812792 | Mattsson et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6824552 | Robison et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6846314 | Shapira | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6856029 | Daniel et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6870160 | Daniel | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6875218 | Dye et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6883217 | Barrette et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
D505611 | Daniel et al. | May 2005 | S |
6905515 | Gilbertson | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6911048 | Fernandez et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6949101 | McCleary et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6990691 | Klotz et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7001392 | McGovern | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7008420 | Okada | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7022141 | Dwyer et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7074224 | Daniels et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7641658 | Shaolian et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
20010001121 | Lombardo et al. | May 2001 | A1 |
20010007957 | Martin et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010016779 | Lubinus | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010021622 | Allman et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010034526 | Kuslich et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020043296 | Daniels et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020058999 | Dwyer et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020059000 | Dwyer et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020127115 | Lucke et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020183758 | Middleton et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020195512 | Zweighft et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030001551 | Daniels et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030048003 | Daniels et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030050645 | Parker et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030071329 | Cox et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030093080 | Brown et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030095368 | Daniels et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030109882 | Shirado et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030114933 | Bouttens et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030130740 | Stocks et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030171756 | Fallin et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030171816 | Scifert et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030180146 | Arel et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030187449 | McCleary et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030204269 | Gerbec et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030220698 | Mears et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030228033 | Daniel et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040015239 | Beguec | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040017085 | Daniels | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040054419 | Serra et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040058997 | Daniel | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040064186 | McCleary et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040066217 | Daniels et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040092951 | Serra et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040122437 | Dwyer et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122439 | Dwyer et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122440 | Daniels et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122525 | Daniels et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040130394 | Mattsson et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040135233 | Cox et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040147933 | McGovern et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040172138 | May et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040172139 | Dwyer et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040210471 | Luby et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040267266 | Daniels et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267267 | Daniels et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267372 | Vanasse et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267373 | Dwyer et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050004679 | Sederholm et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050010992 | Klotz et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050015049 | Rioux et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050033444 | Jones et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050057239 | Fowler et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050078289 | Daniel et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050081910 | Danielson et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050115391 | Baker et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050154331 | Christie et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050188878 | Baker et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050209597 | Long et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050222572 | Chana | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234461 | Burdulis et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050234559 | Fernandez et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050267937 | Daniels et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288676 | Schneiders et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060015110 | Pepper | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060058810 | Wozencroft et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060217737 | Iversen | Sep 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3538654 | Apr 1987 | DE |
0206777 | Dec 1986 | EP |
0511244 | Nov 1992 | EP |
0595956 | May 1994 | EP |
0661023 | Jul 1995 | EP |
0726063 | Aug 1996 | EP |
0728449 | Aug 1996 | EP |
0842639 | May 1998 | EP |
0861635 | Sep 1998 | EP |
1 080 701 | Mar 2001 | EP |
1080701 | Mar 2001 | EP |
1084680 | Mar 2001 | EP |
1080701 | Jul 2001 | EP |
1201191 | May 2002 | EP |
1263334 | Dec 2002 | EP |
1323395 | Jul 2003 | EP |
1348384 | Oct 2003 | EP |
1369089 | Dec 2003 | EP |
1493407 | Jan 2005 | EP |
1493407 | Apr 2005 | EP |
1191906 | Jun 2005 | EP |
1591084 | Nov 2005 | EP |
1080701 | Aug 2006 | EP |
2699400 | Jun 1994 | FR |
2737107 | Jan 1997 | FR |
2828397 | Feb 2003 | FR |
2250441 | Jun 1992 | GB |
2003339724 | Dec 2003 | JP |
9110408 | Jul 1991 | WO |
9210138 | Jun 1992 | WO |
9301769 | Feb 1993 | WO |
9412123 | Jun 1994 | WO |
9427507 | Dec 1994 | WO |
9615738 | May 1996 | WO |
9615739 | May 1996 | WO |
WO 9615739 | May 1996 | WO |
9815739 | Apr 1998 | WO |
0167997 | Sep 2001 | WO |
02102254 | Dec 2002 | WO |
03015642 | Feb 2003 | WO |
03065906 | Aug 2003 | WO |
03082159 | Oct 2003 | WO |
03092513 | Nov 2003 | WO |
03094698 | Nov 2003 | WO |
03094803 | Nov 2003 | WO |
Entry |
---|
European Search Report corresponding to European patent application EP 08 16 7776, dated Feb. 11, 2010 (5 pages). |
Zimmer, “Metasul® LDH™ Large Diameter Head,” Surgical Technique, available at least as early as Sep. 28, 2006, (19 pages). |
Gray, “Clinically-Oriented Geometry of the Femur,” Thesis, Aug. 1995, Queen's University, Ontario, Canada (73 pages). |
Chinese Office Action corresponding to Chinese patent application 200710185735.6, dated Feb. 11, 2011, 13 pages. |
European Search Report corresponding European patent application EP 11 15 1451, dated Feb. 16, 2011, 5 pages. |
Paul, H.A., et al. “Development of a Surgical Robot for Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty,” Clinical Orthopedics & Related Research 285 Dec. 1992: 57-66. |
Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc., “S-ROM Modular Hip System, Minimally Invasive Calcar Miller Surgical Technique,” 0612-04-503, 2004, Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080091212 A1 | Apr 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10606401 | Jun 2003 | US |
Child | 11977138 | US |