Associating information related to components in structured documents stored in their native format in a database

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8145668
  • Patent Number
    8,145,668
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, November 13, 2008
    15 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 27, 2012
    12 years ago
Abstract
A system for associating information related to a component of a structured document that is stored in its native format in a database system includes generating a hierarchical node tree comprising a plurality of nodes, where each node represents a component in the structured document, and generating a path associated with each node, where the path follows the hierarchical structure of the structured document from a root node to the node. In each node, an identifier associated with the path is stored. A table is provided that correlates the identifier with information related to the associated path. The information applies to the component represented by the node.
Description
BACKGROUND

Embodiments of the present invention relate to storing and accessing information in a structured document in a computer implemented database system.


Structured documents have nested structures, i.e., structures that define hierarchical relationships between components of a document. Documents written in Extensible Markup Language (XML) are structured documents. XML is quickly becoming the standard format language for exchanging information over the Internet because it allows the user to design a customized markup language for many classes of structured documents. For example, a business can easily model a complex structure of a document, such as a purchase order, in a form written in XML and send the form for further processing to its business partners. XML supports user-defined tags for better description of nested document structures and associated semantics, and encourages the separation of document content from browser presentation.


As more and more business applications use structured documents written in XML to present and exchange data over the Internet, the challenge is to store, search, and retrieve these documents using existing relational database systems. A relational database management system (RDBMS) is a database management system which uses relational techniques for storing and retrieving data. Relational databases are organized into tables, which consist of rows and columns of data. A database will typically have many tables and each table will typically have multiple rows and columns. The tables are typically stored on direct access storage devices (DASD), such as magnetic or optical disk drives, for semi-permanent storage.


Some relational database systems store an XML document as a Binary Large Object (BLOB). While storing the document as a BLOB is straightforward, accessing the data in the document presents challenges because a BLOB is not easily queried. For example, each BLOB must be read and parsed before it can be queried. For a large number of BLOBs, this process can be prohibitively costly and time consuming.


Other relational database systems store an XML document by mapping the XML data to rows and columns in one or more relational tables. This approach, however, introduces inefficiencies, especially for large XML documents. For example, mapping an XML document to a relational database can result in a large table having numerous columns with null values (which consumes valuable memory) or a large number of tables (which is inefficient and consumes memory).


Moreover, neither approach provides a way to store information related to the document data, e.g., metadata, that does not introduce significant inefficiencies and require significant resources. Furthermore, neither approach preserves the nested structure of the document. Thus, parent-child(ren) relationships are difficult to reconstruct.


Accordingly, it is desirable to be able to store structured documents in their native formats within a database system. It is also desirable to associate related information with components of structured documents. It is also desirable to integrate structured documents into an existing database system in order to use the existing resources of a database system.


SUMMARY

A system for associating information related to a component of a structured document that is stored in its native format in a database system includes generating a hierarchical node tree comprising a plurality of nodes, where each node represents a component in the structured document, and generating a path associated with each node, where the path follows the hierarchical structure of the structured document from a root node to the node. In each node, an identifier associated with the path is stored. A table is provided that correlates the identifier with information related to the associated path. The information applies to the component represented by the node.





DRAWINGS

These features, aspects and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with regard to the following description, appended claims, and accompanying drawings, which illustrate examples of the invention. However, it is to be understood that each of the features can be used in the invention in general, not merely in the context of the particular drawings, and the invention includes any combination of these features, where:



FIG. 1 is a block diagram of exemplary computer hardware that can be used to implement the present invention;



FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an XML Storage mechanism according to a version of the present invention;



FIG. 3 is a high level flowchart illustrating a process for storing XML documents in their native format in a database according to a version of the present invention;



FIG. 4 is a block diagram of an XML Record according to a version of the present invention;



FIG. 5 is a block diagram of a node according to a version of the present invention; and



FIG. 6 illustrates an exemplary path table according to a version of the present invention.





DESCRIPTION

Embodiments of the present invention relate to storing and accessing information in a structured document in a computer implemented database system. Various modifications to the preferred embodiment and the generic principles and features described herein will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art. For example, the following discussion is presented in the context of a DB2® database environment available from IBM® Corporation. It should be understood, however, that the present invention is not limited to DB2 and may be implemented with other relational database systems or with other native XML database systems. Thus, the present invention is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and features described herein.


An exemplary computer hardware environment that can be used with the present invention is illustrated in FIG. 1. A distributed computer system 100 utilizes a network 103 to connect client computers 102 executing client applications to a server computer 104 executing software and other computer programs, and to connect the server computer 104 to data sources 106. These components can be coupled to one another by various networks, including LANs, WANs, and the Internet. Each client computer 102 and the server computer 104 additionally comprises an operating system and one or more computer programs (not shown).


The server computer 104 uses a data store interface 107 for connecting to the data sources 106. The data store interface can be connected to a database management system (DBMS) 105, which supports access to the data store 106. The DBMS 105 can be a relational database management system (RDBMS), such as the DB2® system developed by IBM Corporation, or it also can be a native XML database system. The interface and DBMS 105 can be located at the server computer 104 or may be located on one or more separate machines. The data sources 106 may be geographically distributed.


The DBMS 105 and the instructions derived therefrom all comprise of instructions which, when read and executed by the server computer 104 cause the server computer 104 to perform the steps necessary to implement and/or use the present invention. Those skilled in the art will recognize that the exemplary environment illustrated in FIG. 1 is not intended to limit the present invention, and that alternative environments may be used without departing from the scope of the present invention.


According to one version, the DBMS 105 includes an XML Storage mechanism 200 that supports the storage of XML documents in their native format on disk. Storing data “on disk” refers to storing data persistently, for example, in the data store 106.



FIG. 2 is a block diagram of the XML Storage mechanism 200 according to a version of the present invention. The XML Storage mechanism 200 comprises a parser 204, a node tree generator 206 and a path generator 208.


Typically, a structured document can be represented by a plurality of nodes. The term “node” is used in the Direct Object Model (DOM)-sense, which is a standard XML construct well known to those skilled in the art. In that construct, each node corresponds to a component of the XML document. The component can be an element, an attribute, a value, or other XML construct. The parser 204 interprets the structured document and identifies its node components. The node tree generator 206 receives the nodes representing the XML document and forms a hierarchical node tree 208.


Each node of the XML document can be described by a path that defines the hierarchical relationship between the node and its parent node(s). Every path begins at a root node corresponding to a root element and follows the hierarchical structure defined by the XML document. The path generator 210 generates a path for each node in the node tree 208.



FIG. 3 is a flowchart illustrating a method for storing XML documents in their native format in a database according to a version of the present invention. Referring to FIG. 2 and FIG. 3, the XML Storage mechanism 200 receives or retrieves an XML document 202 for storage (step 300). The XML document 202 is parsed by the parser 204, e.g., a standard SAX (Simple API for XML) parser (step 302).


Next, the node tree generator 206 takes the parsed XML data and generates a plurality of nodes that form the hierarchical node tree 208 that represents the XML document (step 304). For example, suppose a structured document 202 is as follows:

















<Questionnaire>



  <Name> Alice </Name>



  <Questions>



    <Q1> Yes </Q1>



    <Q2> No </Q2>



  </Questions>



<Questionnaire>










The node tree 208 would comprise the following element nodes:




embedded image


The node tree 208 preserves the hierarchical structure of the XML document 202 and also preserves the document order, i.e., the order of the nodes.


After the node tree 208 is generated, the path generator 210 creates a path for each node in the node tree 208 (step 306). Thus, referring to the example above, the path for node Q1 can be:

/Questionnaire/Questions/Q1


The plurality of nodes forming the node tree 208 is stored in an XML Record 400 and the paths are stored in a path table 600 (step 308). The path table 600 is preferably a standard relational table, e.g., with rows and columns, that is stored in the database 106 (FIG. 1).


The XML Record 400 is similar to a standard database record that stores relational data except that the XML Record 400 stores XML data. Storing the plurality of nodes in a record 400 is advantageous for several reasons. A record 400, like an XML document, is variable in length. Records 400 also can be re-directed, providing a layer of indirection that insulates pointers into a tree, from e.g., within the tree itself, from indices, or from an anchor table (described below), if the record 400 is moved to a different page. Moreover, the infrastructure for fixed page buffer management, recovery, utilities (backup/restore), logging, locking, and replication can be reused.



FIG. 4 is a block diagram of an XML Record 400 according to a version of the present invention. As is shown, the XML Record 400 comprises a node slot array 406 and a plurality of nodes 408a, 408b, 408 representing at least one XML document 202. Each entry in a node slot 407 points to a node, e.g., 408, in the node tree 208.


As is shown, each node 408, 408a, 408b comprises an array of child pointers 410. Each child pointer 410 generally points to a node slot 407, which in turn, points to a node, e.g., 408b, corresponding to the child. Thus, for example, Node B (408b) is the child node of Node A (408a). Child pointers 410 can be small because they only need to point to a node slot 407. In certain circumstances a child pointer, e.g., 411, will point to an in-lined character array 412 in the same node, e.g., 408b. The in-lined character array 412 contains information describing the child. In other circumstances, the child pointer 410 itself will comprise information describing the child and its value, i.e., it points to itself.


The structure and contents of the node will now be described with reference to FIG. 5, which is a block diagram of a node 500 according to a version of the present invention. The node 500 is generally divided into two sections, a node header section 510 and a child pointer section 530. The node header section 510 comprises:


The node type 512;


The name of the node 514;


The namespace of this node 516;


Node slot number of the parent node 518; and


A Path Identifier 520.


The node type 512 identifies what component the node 500 represents in the XML document 202. The node type (512) is typically an element, attribute, processing instruction or text node, although those skilled in the art recognize that other less common node types exist. The node name (514) is typically the element or attribute name, or processing instruction target. The namespace of the node (516) is the namespace of the element or attribute. The node slot number of the parent node (518) allows the node 500 to identify its parent node for navigation purposes. The path identifier 520, which correlates to a path, identifies the path that is associated with the node.


The child pointer section 530 comprises at least three formats. The format for a child pointer 410 depends on where the child node resides, e.g., in a separate node (408b) or in the parent node (408a). The first format (532) applies when the child pointer, e.g., 410a, points to an ordered attribute, or internal child in a different node (e.g., 408b). Generally, the node type of such a child will be of an element or attribute type. The second format (534) applies when the child pointer 410 points to an ordered attribute or internal child in an in-lined character array 412 in the node (e.g., 408b). Here, the child is part of its parent node. The third format (536) is applied when the child pointer 410 itself fully describes the child and its value.


In this version, each node 500 is relatively small because it includes minimal information about itself, e.g., its component type, its name, its parent, as well as minimal information about its children. This is desirable because a node tree 208 can comprise hundreds or thousands of nodes 500 and those nodes 500 preferably can be stored in as few records 400 as possible for purposes of performance and efficiency.


In certain circumstances, e.g., during query processing, other information related to the node 500 is desirable or required. Typically such related information is associated with the node's path because more than one node 500 can share the same path. For example, access control rules (ACRs) restrict access to the document 202 or portions of the document 202 to authorized users. Fine-grained ACRs control access at the node-level and are typically defined by the paths associated with the nodes 500. Similarly, schema information and statistical data, e.g., distribution statistics, related to the node 500 are also generally associated with the node's path. Nevertheless, during querying, such related information is difficult to access because the path of a node 500 cannot readily be determined.


According to one version of the present invention, a reference to the node's path is stored in the node 500 itself in the form of the path identifier 520. Information related to the node's path is stored in the path table 600 along with the path identifier 520 associated with the path. Thus, the path identifier 520 provides a link between the node 500 and the path table 600 where information related to the node's path is stored. Consequently, during querying, the DBMS 105 can quickly retrieve the associated information of a node 500.



FIG. 6 is an exemplary path table for an exemplary XML document according to one version of the present invention. The exemplary XML document comprises:

















<bib ver=”1.0”>



 <book year=“1994”>



  <title>TCP/IP Illustrated</title>



  </book>



 <book year=“2002”>



  <title>Advanced Programming in the Java environment</title>



 </book>



</bib>










The table 600 comprises a path identifier column 602, a path column 604, and several columns for information related to all nodes with the same path identifier, e.g., the node 500 associated with the path identifier 602 and path 604. For example, an access control column 606 contains access control information pertaining to each node 500 via the path identifier 602. In one version, the access control column 604 comprises value expressions derived from an access control policy for the document 202. Each value expression is a statement that determines whether a requester is authorized to access the path to the node 500. The value expression is preferably compiled before it is stored in the path table 600 and therefore the DBMS 105 can execute the value expression at runtime to perform access control checking for a particular node 500.


In addition, the path table 600 can include a schema type column 608 that includes a reference to a schema component of an XML Schema corresponding to the XML document 202. Schema components of an XML Schema are well known in the art and are defined at www.w3.org (XML Schema standard). Preferably, the XML schema document is registered and stored in the DBMS 105 in a format such that its components can be identified.


The path table 600 can also include a statistics column 610 that contains information related to the node's path that can be used by the DBMS 105 to optimize execution plans. For example, the statistical information can include distribution statistics that indicate within what range values fall, the number of entries that include the value, and other information that help the DBMS 105 to create efficient execution plans. The statistical information in the statistics column 610 is preferably stored as a binary large object (BLOB).


The path table 600 can also include other columns, e.g., a miscellaneous column 612, that contain other types of information related to the node's path. Accordingly, detailed information pertaining to a node 500 can be captured and easily associated with the node 500 via the path identifier 602 without increasing the size of the node 500. While navigating a structured document 202, e.g., during query execution, the DBMS 105 can access information related to any node 500 it traverses by looking up the path identifier 602 of the node 500 in the path table 600.


Embodiments of the present invention associate information related to data in a structured document stored in its native format in a computer implemented database. Through the aspects of the present invention, a structured document is parsed and a hierarchical node tree comprising a plurality of nodes is generated from the parsed data. Each node represents a component in the structured document and includes a path identifier. The path identifier is used to directly locate in a path table information related to the node during the querying process.


The present invention has been described with reference to certain preferred versions thereof; however, other versions are possible. For example, the storage mechanism 200 can be used for any structured document and is not restricted to XML documents, as would be apparent to one of ordinary skill. Other configurations of the path table can also be used. For example, the path table is not limited to the types of information illustrated in FIG. 6 and other types of information related to the node can be stored in the path table. Further, alternative steps equivalent to those described for the storage method can also be used in accordance with the parameters of the described implementation, as would be apparent to one of ordinary skill. Therefore, the spirit and scope of the appended claims should not be limited to the description of the preferred versions contained herein.

Claims
  • 1. A computer readable storage medium containing programming instructions that, when executed by a computer, cause the computer to perform a method of associating information related to a component in a structured document that is stored in its native format in a database system comprising instructions for: a) generating a node slot array and a hierarchical node tree, wherein the hierarchical node tree comprises a plurality of nodes, wherein each node represents a component in the structured document, wherein each node comprises a header section and a child pointer section, wherein the child pointer section comprises a plurality of child pointers to minimize node size, and wherein at least one child pointer points to a node slot within the node slot array, which in turn, includes an entry which points to a node corresponding to the child node;b) for each node, generating a path associated with the node, wherein the path follows the hierarchical structure of the structured document from a root node to the node;c) storing in each node an identifier associated with the path for the node; andd) providing a table that correlates the identifier with the information related to the associated path, wherein the information applies to the component represented by the node.
  • 2. The computer readable medium according to claim 1 wherein generating the hierarchical node tree comprises: a1) parsing the structured document into the plurality of nodes; anda2) linking each of the nodes via pointers to form the hierarchical node tree.
  • 3. The computer readable medium according to claim 1 further comprising: e) storing each node in at least one record in the database, wherein each record comprises a plurality of node slots and each node slot includes a pointer pointing to a node of the plurality of nodes.
  • 4. The computer readable medium according to claim 1 wherein a node has at least one child node and comprises at least one child pointer that points to each of the child nodes.
  • 5. The computer readable medium according to claim 1 further comprising: e) storing the identifier in the table.
  • 6. The computer readable medium according to claim 5 further comprising: f) storing the path in the table; andg) correlating the identifier with the path associated with the node.
  • 7. The computer readable medium according to claim 1 further comprising: e) for each path, providing access control information based on an access control policy for the structured document;f) storing the access control information in the table; andg) correlating the identifier for the node with the access control information associated with the path.
  • 8. The computer readable medium according to claim 7 wherein the access control information associated with the path is an executable statement indicating who is granted or denied access to the node.
  • 9. The computer readable medium according to claim 1 further comprising: e) for each path, determining schema information associated with the path;f) storing a reference to the schema information in the table; andg) correlating the identifier for the path with the reference to the schema information associated with the path.
  • 10. The computer readable medium according to claim 1 further comprising: e) for each path, collecting statistical information associated with the path;f) storing the statistical information in the table; andg) correlating the identifier for the path with the statistical information associated with the path.
  • 11. The computer readable medium according to claim 1 wherein the child pointer points to an in-lined character array.
  • 12. The computer readable medium according to claim 1 wherein the child pointer points to itself.
  • 13. A system for associating information related to a component in a structured document that is stored in its native format in a database system comprising: a) a computer system coupled to at least one data storage device;b) a database management system in the computer system;c) a storage mechanism in the database management system for generating a node slot array and a hierarchical node tree, wherein the hierarchical node tree comprises a plurality of nodes, wherein each node represents a component in the structured document, wherein each node comprises a header section and a child pointer section, wherein the child pointer section comprises a plurality of child pointers to minimize node size, and wherein at least one child pointer points to a node slot within the node slot array, which in turn, includes an entry which points to a node corresponding to the child node, wherein the storage mechanism comprises a path generator for generating a path associated with each node, wherein the path follows the hierarchical structure of the structured document from a root node to the node and wherein the storage mechanism stores in each node an identifier associated with the path; andd) a table in the data storage device, wherein the table correlates the identifier with information related to the associated path, wherein the information applies to the component represented by the node.
  • 14. The system according to claim 13 wherein the storage mechanism further comprises a parser for parsing the structured document into a plurality of nodes and a node tree generator for linking each of the nodes via pointers to form the hierarchical node tree.
  • 15. The system according to claim 13, wherein the storage mechanism stores each node in at least one record in the database, wherein each record comprises a plurality of node slots and each node slot includes a pointer pointing to a node.
  • 16. The system according to claim 13 wherein the storage mechanism stores the identifier in the table.
  • 17. The system according to claim 16 wherein the storage mechanism stores the path in the table and correlates the identifier with the path associated with the node.
  • 18. The system according to claim 13 further comprising access control information for each path, wherein the access control information is based on an access control policy for the structured document, and wherein the storage mechanism stores the access control information in the table and correlates the identifier for the path with the access control information associated with the path.
  • 19. The system according to claim 18 wherein the access control information associated with the path is an executable statement indicating who is granted or denied access to the node.
  • 20. The system according to claim 13 further determining for each path schema information associated with the path, and wherein the storage mechanism stores a reference to the schema information in the table and correlates the identifier for the path with the reference to the schema information.
  • 21. The system according to claim 13 further comprising means for collecting for each path statistical information associated with the path and wherein the storage mechanism stores the statistical information in the table and correlates the identifier for the path with the statistical information.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

Under 35 USC §120, this application is a continuation application and claims the benefit of priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/016,107, filed Dec. 17, 2004, entitled “ASSOCIATING INFORMATION RELATED TO COMPONENTS OF A STRUCTURED DOCUMENT STORED IN ITS NATIVE FORMAT IN A DATABASE”, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/648,760, filed Aug. 25, 2003, entitled “METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR STORING STRUCTURED DOCUMENTS IN THEIR NATIVE FORMAT IN A DATABASE” all of which is incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (73)
Number Name Date Kind
4907151 Bartlett Mar 1990 A
5193184 Belsan et al. Mar 1993 A
5283830 Hinsley et al. Feb 1994 A
5412807 Moreland May 1995 A
5561786 Morse Oct 1996 A
5644776 DeRose et al. Jul 1997 A
5652858 Okada et al. Jul 1997 A
5671403 Shekita et al. Sep 1997 A
5673334 Nichani et al. Sep 1997 A
5758361 van Hoff May 1998 A
5787449 Vulpe et al. Jul 1998 A
5878415 Olds Mar 1999 A
5893086 Schmuck et al. Apr 1999 A
5920861 Hall et al. Jul 1999 A
5995952 Kato Nov 1999 A
6044373 Gladney et al. Mar 2000 A
6081810 Rosenzweig et al. Jun 2000 A
6085193 Malkin et al. Jul 2000 A
6101558 Utsunomiya et al. Aug 2000 A
6236996 Bapat et al. May 2001 B1
6237099 Kurokawa May 2001 B1
6249844 Schloss et al. Jun 2001 B1
6308173 Glasser et al. Oct 2001 B1
6334130 Tada et al. Dec 2001 B1
6336114 Garrison Jan 2002 B1
6366934 Cheng et al. Apr 2002 B1
6381602 Shoroff et al. Apr 2002 B1
6421656 Cheng et al. Jul 2002 B1
6438576 Huang et al. Aug 2002 B1
6457103 Challenger et al. Sep 2002 B1
6480865 Lee et al. Nov 2002 B1
6487566 Sundaresan Nov 2002 B1
6502101 Verprauskus et al. Dec 2002 B1
6519597 Cheng et al. Feb 2003 B1
6584458 Millett et al. Jun 2003 B1
6631371 Lei et al. Oct 2003 B1
6658652 Alexander, III et al. Dec 2003 B1
6798776 Cheriton et al. Sep 2004 B1
6820082 Cook et al. Nov 2004 B1
6836778 Manikutty et al. Dec 2004 B2
6853992 Igata Feb 2005 B2
6901410 Marron et al. May 2005 B2
6922695 Skufca et al. Jul 2005 B2
6938204 Hind et al. Aug 2005 B1
6947945 Carey et al. Sep 2005 B1
6959416 Manning et al. Oct 2005 B2
7016915 Shanmugasundaram et al. Mar 2006 B2
7031962 Moses Apr 2006 B2
7043487 Krishnamurthy et al. May 2006 B2
7353222 Dodds et al. Apr 2008 B2
7478337 Kodosky et al. Jan 2009 B2
7493603 Fuh et al. Feb 2009 B2
7756857 Wan Jul 2010 B2
7818666 Dorsett et al. Oct 2010 B2
20010018697 Kunitake et al. Aug 2001 A1
20020038319 Yahagi Mar 2002 A1
20020099715 Jahnke et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020103829 Manning et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020111965 Kutter et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020112224 Cox Aug 2002 A1
20020123993 Chau et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020133484 Chau et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020156772 Chau et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020156811 Krupa Oct 2002 A1
20020169788 Lee et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030014397 Chau et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030028495 Pallante Feb 2003 A1
20030204515 Shadmon et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030208490 Larrea et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040044959 Shanmugasundaram et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040128615 Carmel et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040193607 Kudo et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040243553 Bailey Dec 2004 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number Date Country
0992873 Apr 2000 EP
WO 03030031 Apr 2003 WO
WO2004036417 Apr 2004 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20090077625 A1 Mar 2009 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 11016107 Dec 2004 US
Child 12270821 US
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 10648760 Aug 2003 US
Child 11016107 US