The invention relates to elevator door construction and, in particular, to the type of freight elevator doors that open and close with vertical motion.
Freight elevators, sometimes referred to as cargo lifts or goods lifts, typically have vertically operating doors at their landings or floors. The doors can be of several different styles, one of the more common being a bi-parting unit. Various other known door styles in which the door construction has a panel that opens vertically upwardly is adaptable to the present invention. To protect personnel and property, the lower edge of the upwardly opening panel is typically fitted with a resilient astragal. The resilient astragal reduces impact forces when the lower edge of the upper panel contacts a person or object.
Traditionally, the panels making up the landing doors are fabricated with a rigid frame made up of structural elements such as angle iron. Sheet steel is attached to the structural framework, typically by welding.
It is important that the resilient astragal, besides serving to cushion impacts, serves to work as a fire stop in the event of a fire and continues to seal against a surface for a minimum period of time. The performance of the astragal is dependent not only on its construction, but also on the ability of the structural part of the door to which it is attached to maintain its integrity and shape. In the event of a fire, structural door elements can distort by bending out of their original plane and may make it difficult or impossible for an astragal to maintain its seal against the surface with which it seats.
The invention provides a door panel for a freight elevator with an astragal assembly that affords improved seal performance in a fire and that can be manufactured more economically than certain prior art designs.
As disclosed, the door panel is fabricated primarily of steel sheet stock. At a lower edge of the panel, a resilient astragal hangs supported from a unique structural steel assembly. The astragal supporting structure has been found, surprisingly, to resist bending and excessive buckling of the door assembly to a greater extent than is experienced with prior art designs that involve more massive structures. The result is a door panel that has less material content and labor cost but which resists heat distortion to a greater extent than a door panel construction it replaces.
Referring now to the figures, an elevator door panel or assembly is designated by the numeral 10. The panel or assembly 10 in the illustrated example is an upper panel of a regular bi-parting style door. As will be understood by those skilled in the art, the invention can be applied to other door panel configurations including extended, pass and compound bi-parting door panels. The panel 10, thus, is representative of any of a variety of other vertically sliding landing doors for closing the opening in a room to an elevator shaft and to a freight elevator car. The panel 10 is primarily a steel weldment comprising a rectangular, planar steel sheet or plate 11 reinforced by peripheral stiffening members 12, 13 and 14 at its upper horizontal edge 16, vertical side edges 17, and bottom horizontal edge 18, respectively, and by intermediate vertical steel stiffening members 19 in its mid-section. The stiffening members 12, 13, 14 and 19 are all disposed on a side of the panel sheet 11 facing the elevator shaft. The various stiffening members 12, 13, 14 and 19 are suitably welded together at their intersections and at zones of contact with the sheet 11. The sheet 11 depending on service conditions and/or size, can be 14 or 12 gauge stock, for example. The upper member 12 is, for instance, a 2½″×2″× 3/16″ steel angle. Alternatively, by way of example, the upper edge stiffening member can be a 2½″×2″×1″ Z-bracket (shown in phantom at 21 in
The side stiffening members 13 are, for example, 2″×2″× 3/16″ steel angle. The intermediate stiffening members 19 are, for instance 6″×1⅝″ channels which have a hat-shaped cross section, as shown in
The lower or bottom edge 18 of the panel 10 is stiffened by an astragal assembly 14. The assembly 14 comprises several elongated structural steel members 26, 27 and 28 and a pair of fire-resistant, resilient sheets 31, 32 folded into U-shapes with one 31 nested within the other 32. The structural steel members include an elongated rectangular flat 26, for instance, ¼″ to 1″ thick, depending upon application, by 2″ wide. Below the flat 26 which forms the primary structural stiffening element is a major inverted channel 27 and a minor inverted channel 28 nested within the major channel. The major channel 27 is welded to the flat 26 at points 33 spaced along their lengths. The minor channel 28 is plug welded as typically shown in
With reference to
It has been found that, unexpectedly, the disclosed astragal assembly, while having less mass and less section modulus about a vertical mid-plane than prior art structures performs more satisfactorily in fire tests than prior art designs and by virtue of its reduced mass and simpler geometry reduces material and labor costs. While this phenomena is not fully understood, it is believed to be due, at least in part, by the symmetry of the astragal parts about a central vertical plane. As an alternative design, a 2″×1″ steel angle 46 of relatively light gauge stock (e.g. 7 GA.) can be employed across the full width of the panel 10 and suitably welded between the stiffener 19 and flat 26.
It should be evident that this disclosure is by way of example and that various changes may be made by adding, modifying or eliminating details without departing from the fair scope of the teaching contained in this disclosure. The invention is therefore not limited to particular details of this disclosure except to the extent that the following claims are necessarily so limited.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
982303 | Saino et al. | Jan 1911 | A |
1146960 | Saino | Jul 1915 | A |
1678652 | Saurer | Jul 1928 | A |
1724052 | Swearengin | Aug 1929 | A |
2663057 | Uphoff | Dec 1953 | A |
2805450 | Schlytern | Sep 1957 | A |
2891289 | Guilbert, Jr. | Jun 1959 | A |
2923984 | Jecmen | Feb 1960 | A |
3943663 | Jecmen et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
3980123 | Vago | Sep 1976 | A |
3981102 | Harwood et al. | Sep 1976 | A |
4224767 | Jecmen et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4953608 | Larsson | Sep 1990 | A |
4984658 | Peelle, Jr. et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5165505 | Hayashi et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5259143 | Mitchell et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5394961 | Biver | Mar 1995 | A |
5396735 | Dietrich | Mar 1995 | A |
5481076 | Mullet et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5712458 | McCandless et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5904014 | Ripamonti et al. | May 1999 | A |
5964058 | Richardson | Oct 1999 | A |
5988321 | Kondo | Nov 1999 | A |
6453616 | Wright | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6606831 | Degelsegger | Aug 2003 | B2 |
20020139621 | Watabe et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20040134128 | Berry et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
01197296 | Aug 1989 | JP |
11011839 | Jan 1999 | JP |
11043276 | Feb 1999 | JP |
11-247544 | Sep 1999 | JP |
2002-61468 | Feb 2002 | JP |
WO 9958803 | Nov 1999 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040168862 A1 | Sep 2004 | US |