The present invention relates generally to the field of data processing and more particularly to high-bandwidth memory systems.
Modular memories are commonly used in computers and other electronic systems that may require after-market storage-capacity expansion. For example, multiple memory-module sockets may be coupled to a memory controller via a shared memory channel, with each socket being coupled to the memory channel via a stub path. Memory modules are initially installed in fewer than all the sockets so that one or more additional modules may be inserted later to increase (expand) the system storage capacity. Unfortunately, the stub path coupling each socket to the shared memory channel may present a substantial source of undesired noise (especially signal reflections), and thus limit signaling rates and therefore peak memory bandwidth.
Although separate, replicated memory channels could be coupled point-to-point between the controller and respective memory-module sockets, that approach multiplies the number of controller interface pins and external signal lines by the number of memory-module sockets, driving up cost and limiting the number of expansion sockets that can be supported.
The present invention is illustrated by way of example, and not by way of limitation, in the figures of the accompanying drawings and in which like reference numerals refer to similar elements and in which:
An expandable memory system and components thereof that enable signaling bandwidth to be configurably re-allocated among dedicated memory channels are disclosed in various embodiments. In one embodiment, for example, memory channels having progressively reduced widths are dedicated to respective memory sockets, thus enabling point-to-point signaling with respect to each memory socket without signal-compromising traversal of unloaded sockets or costly replication of a (full-width) memory channel for each socket. When one or more memory modules are installed in previously unoccupied sockets (i.e., to expand the system storage capacity), a fraction of the signaling bandwidth allocated to the previously loaded socket(s) is reallocated to the newly loaded (occupied) sockets. Thus, the net signaling bandwidth may remain fixed as new memory modules are added, but the bandwidth share allocated to each memory module is diluted (reduced) to account for the increased memory module count. Further, recognizing that the bandwidth share drops progressively as the module population grows, and by establishing a predefined socket loading order, progressively narrower memory channels (i.e., signaling paths for transfer of read and write data, at least, and possibly other signals) may be coupled to later-loaded sockets.
As an example, because the bandwidth share allocated to each socket (assuming an even distribution) is halved for each doubling of the memory module population, an expansion from a single module population to a two-module population may be effected by splitting the net signaling bandwidth (B) allocated to the first-loaded memory socket (i.e., the “base socket”) in two, retaining half of the signaling bandwidth (B/2) for the base socket and re-directing the other half of the signaling bandwidth to the first expansion socket. Because the net signaling bandwidth corresponds to a fixed number of signaling links, L, (i.e., L=B/R, where R is the peak signaling rate of each link), it follows that the first expansion socket need only be coupled to half as many signaling links as the base socket. Thus, memory channels having different numbers of constituent signaling links (i.e., asymmetric memory channels) are coupled to the two memory sockets—L signaling links to the base socket and L/2 signaling links to the first expansion socket. By this arrangement, when a memory module is installed in the base socket only (i.e., single module configuration), the L links that constitute the full-width memory channel to the base socket are all used to convey information-bearing signals and are thus referred to herein as “live” links, while the L/2 links that constitute the half-width memory channel to the first expansion socket remain unused and are said to be “dormant.”
By contrast, when a memory module is installed in the first expansion socket (expanding the memory system capacity), half of the available signaling bandwidth is reallocated from the base socket to the first expansion socket to establish effective half-width channels to each socket. More specifically, the L/2 links that form the half-width memory channel to the expansion socket (i.e., the “half-width expansion channel”) are made live, and half of the L links that constitute the full-width memory channel to the base socket (the “base channel”) are rendered dormant, thereby maintaining a fixed number of live links, L (and therefore a fixed signaling bandwidth), but with increased storage capacity. As a matter of terminology, the half-width expansion channel is said to be activated (i.e., constituent links transitioned from dormant to live status), and half of the base channel deactivated, with the remaining L/2 live links of the base channel forming a half-width “logical channel.”
In the embodiment of
Still referring to
As shown, the asymmetric memory channels have respective widths configured according to the expected loading order of the module sockets to which they are connected. More specifically, a full-width memory channel 2110 (i.e., n DQ links) is coupled to base socket, S0, to allocate the full system bandwidth to a memory module installed in that socket in a single-module configuration (i.e., all other sockets empty—also referred to herein as the base configuration, or x1 configuration). By contrast, a half-width memory channel (n/2 DQ links) 2111 is coupled to the first expansion socket, S1, to enable half the system bandwidth to be reallocated from the base socket to the first expansion socket when the latter is loaded with a memory module. That is, when the system capacity is expanded from the base configuration to a two-module configuration (x2 configuration) through module installation in S1, half of the memory bandwidth is reallocated from the originally inserted memory module to the newly inserted memory module. Accordingly, in the two-module configuration, only half the DQ links of base memory channel 2110 are live, and the other half dormant. Following that same approach, quarter-width memory channels (n/4 DQ links each) 2112, 2113 are coupled to the second and third expansion slots, S2 and S3, to enable respective one-fourth shares of the system bandwidth to be reallocated from sockets S0 and S1 to sockets S2 and S3 when those sockets are populated.
The bandwidth reallocation operation may be better appreciated by considering that each of the memory channels 2110-2113 and the internal signaling path 208 to be formed by one or more sets of signaling links, referred to herein as signal-link groups, with each signal-link group corresponding to the minimum bandwidth share to be allocated to any one of the memory channels 211—that is, a (1/M)th share of the signaling bandwidth, where M is the number of module sockets, and thus n/M signaling links. Accordingly, in the four-socket example of
When expanded further to the three-module population shown at 229, the signal-link groups are allocated unevenly between the three populated sockets (S0, S1, S2), with the base module in socket S0 maintaining 50% share of the system bandwidth, and the remaining 50% share being split evenly among the modules in the first and second expansion sockets (S1 and S2). In alternative embodiments, particularly where the total system bandwidth permits an even three-way split (e.g., internal data path width evenly divisible by 3), an even distribution of the signaling bandwidth among the three installed memory modules may be supported.
Finally, when expanded to the four-module population shown at 231, the signaling bandwidth is again distributed evenly, with each of the four signal-link groups of the internal path being coupled to a signal-link group within a respective one of the four memory channels 2110-2113, thereby allocating a one-fourth bandwidth share to each of the four installed memory modules.
Reflecting on the bandwidth allocation options shown at 224, the numbers of live and dormant signaling links remains constant, regardless of the socket loading configuration. Thus, when a single memory module is installed, the four signal-link groups that constitute base memory channel 2110 are live, while remaining four signal-link groups that constitute memory channels 2111-2113 (i.e., two signal-link groups to S1 and one each to S2 and S3) are dormant. When two memory modules are installed, two of the signal-link groups in the base memory channel 2110 are deactivated and the same number activated in the S1 memory channel 2111, thereby maintaining a fixed memory bandwidth. Similarly, when expanding from two installed modules to three, one of the signal-link groups in the first expansion channel 2111 (i.e., to S1) is deactivated and the sole constituent signal-link group of the second expansion channel 2112 is activated. Finally, in the four module configuration, three of the four signal-link groups of base memory channel 2110 are deactivated, freeing the corresponding three signal-link groups of the internal data path 208 to be distributed one apiece among the other three memory channels 2111-2113 and thus maintaining the same total memory bandwidth as other socket loading configurations, but distributing that bandwidth among the four memory channels to establish a quarter-bandwidth connection to each of the memory modules (225, 227, 229 and 231).
Continuing with the single-ended embodiment shown, because the base socket (S0) will receive, at minimum, (1/M)th of the signal bandwidth in any configuration and thus will always be coupled to at least one live DQ group, one lane group may be dedicated (i.e., coupled via a non-switched and therefore permanent connection) to a corresponding DQ group for the base socket as shown by permanent coupling 245 between lane group LG0 and the set of interface nodes 251 coupled to a base channel DQ group. The constituent data lanes of the permanently connected lane group are thus referred to herein as non-switched lanes. By contrast, each of the other lane groups, LG1-LGm-1, may need to be reallocated from the base channel to one of the expansion memory channels (i.e., to sockets S1-Sm−1) and is thus switchably coupled via steering switch 243 to the set of interface nodes for either a base-channel DQ group or an expansion-channel DQ group. Accordingly, the constituent data lanes of these steered or switched lane groups are referred to as “switched lanes.”
In one embodiment, steering switch 243 includes switching elements 2471-247m-1 to switchably couple the data lanes of each switched lane group to one of N sets of interface nodes for corresponding DQ lanes, where N varies according to the number of different memory channels to which a given lane group may be allocated. Because each different allocation option results in the signals of the switched lane group being steered to/from a different DQ group (i.e., steered to/from a different memory channel and thus to/from a different socket), the allocation options are referred to herein as “steering options.” Further, in an embodiment in which the number of links allocated to higher-numbered expansion sockets is halved for each doubling of the socket count (i.e., base socket S0 coupled to L signaling links, first expansion socket S1 coupled to L/2 signaling links, expansion sockets S2-S3 coupled to L/4 signaling links, expansion sockets S4-S7 coupled to L/8 signaling links, etc.), the final lane group is subject to at least log2m steering options (where ‘m’ is the number of module sockets). For example, if there are eight module sockets total (base socket, S0, plus seven expansion sockets, S1-S7), then one of the corresponding eight lane groups, LG0) is permanently coupled to one of the sets of the interface nodes for the S0 memory channel (i.e., the memory channel dedicated to socket S0), the next lane group, LG1, may be switchably coupled to either a set of interface nodes for the S0 memory channel or to a set of interface nodes for the S1 memory channel, the next lane group (not specifically shown) may be switchably coupled to a set of interface nodes for the S0 memory channel, the S1 memory channel or the S2 memory channel, and so forth with the final lane group being switchably coupled to a set of interface nodes for the S0, S1, S3 or S7 memory channels. Although numerous different connection arrangements are possible (including those which permit a more efficient steering switch implementation as discussed below), the following table presents one possible combination of bandwidth allocations for each of the loading configurations in an eight socket system:
Reflecting on the bandwidth allocation options of Table 1, each of the switched lane groups is switched between as few as two and at least as many as log2m+1 different steering options. Lane group LG1, for example, is switchably coupled to either socket S0 or socket S1 (two steering options) and thus may be steered by a 1:2 switch element 2471 as shown. By contrast, lane group LG7 is switchably coupled to one of four different sockets (i.e., log28+1=four steering options) so that, in the 8-socket example of Table 1, switch element 247m-1 may be implemented by a 1:4 switch), including socket S0 in the single-module (x1) configuration, socket S1 in the x2 configuration, socket S3 in the x3-x6 configurations and socket S7 in the x7 and x8 configurations. Thus, steering switch may be formed by m−1 switching elements (one for each of the switched lane groups), including switches having as few as two steering options (switch selections) per data lane, and switches having at least as many as log2m+1 steering options. Also, because the number of required interface nodes increases by half the base number (n) for each doubling of the number of module sockets, the total number of interface nodes is given by n+0.5*n*log2m (or n+½*n*(S0−1), where denotes multiplication. That is, the number of interface nodes is proportional to the log of the socket count (not the socket count itself as in the replicated-channel system discussed above). Further, the number of interface nodes required per memory socket (and thus the memory channel width and maximum allocable fraction of the system bandwidth for that socket) halves with each doubling of the number of memory sockets, with the sockets in the last-to-be-loaded half of the system having half the minimum number of interface nodes provided to the sockets in the first-to-be-loaded half of the system. Analytically, the number of interface nodes per socket in such an embodiment may be expressed as: n/(2*roundup(log2X)), where denotes multiplication, ‘X’ is the socket number (an integer between 1 and m that corresponds to the order in which the socket is loaded, with socket number 1 being loaded first), and “roundup( )” is a function that rounds its argument up to the nearest integer. For example, in an eight-socket system in accordance with the foregoing, the number of interface nodes per socket may be as follows (more or fewer sockets may be provided in alternative embodiments):
In the three-module configuration, the internal bandwidth is unevenly allocated between the base memory channel and the first and second expansion channels. In the particular implementation shown, for example, the first expansion channel is allocated half the signaling bandwidth (and thus is coupled to two data lanes per lane fragment), while the base channel and the second expansion channel are each allocated a respective quarter of the signaling bandwidth (and thus are each coupled to a single data lane per lane fragment). Note that this configuration involves allocating more bandwidth to an expansion socket than the base socket, but provides the advantage of reduced switching circuitry as shown in cell detail view 287. As can be seen, data lane 0 of each four-lane fragment is dedicated (coupled without switching and thus permanently) to link 0 within the counterpart 4-link fragment of the base memory channel (S0_DQ0), while the remaining three data lanes are coupled via respective switching elements 291, 293, 295 to one of at least two signaling links. More specifically, data lane 1 is switchably coupled to either S0_DQ1 (link DQ1 within the memory channel to socket S0) or S1_DQ0 (link DQ0 within the expansion channel to socket S1) via switching element 291, data lane 2 is switchably coupled to either S0_DQ2 or S2_DQ0 (the latter being a link within the memory channel to socket S2) via switching element 293, and data lane 3 is switchably coupled to either S0_DQ3 (the fourth of the four links of the S0 channel fragment), S1_DQ1 (the second of the two links of the S1 channel fragment) or S3_DQ0 (a link within the memory channel to socket S3) via switching element 295. Though depicted as multiplexer/demultiplexer circuits in
The fundamental function of the steering circuitry remains unchanged whether disposed upstream of the I/O circuitry as in memory control IC 301 (i.e., steering circuit 321 disposed between I/O circuitry 323 and controller core logic 311) or downstream of the I/O circuitry as in memory control IC 303 (i.e., I/O circuit 341 disposed between controller core logic 311 and steering circuit 343), though implementation details may change. In the former arrangement (steering circuitry disposed between controller core and I/O circuitry), separate unidirectional steering circuits 325 and 327 may be provided for incoming and outgoing data flow directions as shown. In that case, the n “logic-side” output data lanes (DLLO) are switchably coupled via outbound steering circuit 327 to a live subset of a larger number of “PHY-side” output data lanes (DLPO) which are then driven, via respective interface nodes, onto a corresponding subset of live external signaling links (DQ) by output drivers 331. Inbound steering circuit 325 performs the reverse function, steering signals received via the live subset of DQ links, receiver circuits 329 and PHY-side input data links (DLPI) to the full-set of logic-side input data links (DLLI). In the four-channel/four-socket example shown, the number of PHY-side data lanes (DLPI, DLPO) is twice the number of logic-side data lanes (DLLI, DLLO), so half the PHY-side input data lanes and half the PHY-side output data lanes are dormant in any loading configuration. The signal drivers and/or receivers coupled to dormant data lanes may remain unpowered to reduce power consumption and thermal loading.
Detail view 330 illustrates an example of a digital demultiplexer element 371 that may be replicated as necessary within steering circuits 325 and 327 to provide a unidirectional 1:2 signal steering function. As shown, an incoming data lane (“Input”) is coupled to the inputs of two logic AND gates 373, 375, with gate 373 having an inverting enable-input coupled to switch-control line (SC) and gate 375 having a non-inverting enable-input coupled to the switch-control line. By this arrangement, a logic-low switch-control signal enables AND gate 373 to pass the incoming data signal to output A (“OutA”) and disables AND gate 375 from passing the data signal to output B (“OutB”). Conversely, a logic-high switch control signal enables AND gate 375 to pass the incoming data signal to output B and disables AND gate 373 from passing the data signal to output A. Demultiplexer element 371 may be used as a building block (or the logic therein extended) to provide a generalized 1:N or N:1 steering function within steering circuits 325 and 327.
When disposed downstream of the I/O circuitry as in memory control IC 303, the steering circuitry 343 steers signals between a set of n internal signaling links, DQI, and a live subset of the larger number external signaling links, DQX. While this approach obviates separate steering circuits for different data flow directions as in IC 301, a degree of signal attenuation may result from placement of the steering circuitry on the output side of the signal drivers (and in front of the inputs to the signal receivers). Also, because link-to-link timing compensation may be provided within the signal output drivers, any link-to-link delay skew resulting from, for example timing differences in switched and non-switched signal paths) may reduce system timing margin (though this may alternatively be compensated by receiver-side timing calibration).
Detail view 350 illustrates an example of a switching element that may be replicated as necessary within steering circuit 343 (or within steering circuits 325 and/or 327) to provide a bidirectional 1:2 (and 2:1) or unidirectional signal steering function. As shown, an internal signal link, DQI is switchably coupled to each of two external signaling links DQXA and DQXB via respective pass gates 383 and 385. Each of the pass gates is implemented by a pair of parallel-coupled transistors that is switched on in response to opposite polarity gate voltages (e.g., PMOS and NMOS transistors in the example shown). A switch control signal is provided to the gate terminals of each pass-gate 383 and 385 in a reverse polarity orientation such that one of the pass gates is switched to a conducting state (i.e., switched on) and the other to a substantially non-conducting state (i.e., switched off), depending on the state of the switch control signal. More specifically, in the embodiment shown, a logic high switch control signal switches on pass gate 383 (through application of the logic high voltage to the NMOS transistor and a logic low voltage, generated by inverted 387, to the PMOS transistor) and switches off pass gate 385 to switchably couple the internal data link, DQI[i] exclusively and bidirectionally to external link DQXA[i]. Conversely, a logic low switch-control signal switches on pass gate 385 (logic low signal applied to PMOS transistor and logic high signal, generated by inverter 387, applied to NMOS transistor) and switches off pass gate 383 to switchably couple DQI[i] exclusively and bidirectionally to external link DQXB[i]. Analog switching element may be used as a building block (or the number of pass gates therein increased) to provide a generalized 1:N or N:1 steering function.
As mentioned, the steering circuitry may also be disposed in a buffer IC 307, thus enabling use of memory control IC that lacks an internal steering function (e.g., the buffer IC may provide for capacity expansion while maintaining a compatible system integration with legacy systems that utilize memory controllers lacking an internal steering function). In the embodiment shown, for example, buffer IC 307 is coupled between a set of asymmetric memory channels (shown as four channels having widths n, n/2, n/4 and n/4) and a memory control IC 305 having controller core logic 313 and physical I/O circuitry (drivers 365 and receivers 367), but lacking the above-described signal steering function. More specifically, the buffer IC 307 includes a steering circuit 361 and memory-side interface (indicated conceptually by links DQM) to the asymmetric memory channels, as well as a controller-side interface (indicated by links DQC) to the memory control IC 305. The buffer IC may be mounted to a motherboard or other substrate (thus forming a buffer-on-board) or together with the memory control IC and/or other IC's in an integrated circuit package (e.g., a system-in-package). With regard to internal organization, the steering circuit 361 may be disposed on either side of the physical memory-side signaling interface (e.g., as in memory IC 301 or memory IC 303) and thus implemented using either of the multiplexing or switching elements 371 and 381.
The steering circuit may also be implemented entirely off-chip, for example, by a collection of zero-ohm resistors, mechanical switches or other conductive interconnects that do not significantly compromise signal integrity (i.e., negligible signal radiation, impedance discontinuity, etc.) and that may be configured at production time or post-production time to permit memory capacity selection and/or expansion.
Still referring to
As discussed in reference to
Referring to detail view 410 of
Reflecting on
At 453, the possible steering configuration (there may be more than one, particularly where the modules installed in a given socket are unable to support the bandwidth allocable to that socket) are determined based on the characteristics of the module population. At 455, a steering configuration is selected (e.g., in response to user selection (456a), by looking up a previously recorded selection by a user or system designer (e.g., in a hardware look-up table or stored as part of a software program) (456b), by applying the default steering configuration corresponding to the module population characteristics (456c), etc.). At 457, the steering logic is configured in accordance with the selected steering configuration for example, by programming a register within the memory interface IC (or establishing the state of off-chip switch elements if such configurability is supported) in accordance with the selected steering configuration. At 459, programmable width memory devices, if present within the module population, may be programmed in accordance with the selected steering configuration to establish matching logical channel widths and on-module data interface widths.
The foregoing operations may be effectuated, in whole or part, through execution of machine-executable program code. The program code (i.e., sequences of instructions and related data) may be recorded on one or more computer-readable media for later retrieval and execution within one or more processors of a special purpose or general purpose computer system or consumer electronic device or appliance. Computer-readable media in which such instructions and data may be embodied include, but are not limited to, machine-readable storage media in various forms. Examples of such machine-readable media include, for example and without limitation, optical, magnetic or semiconductor storage media such as floppy disk, CD, DVD, active RAM within a computer, or any other type of physical device from which the instructions may be extracted under full or partial control of a machine.
The various circuits disclosed herein may be described using computer aided design tools and expressed (or represented), as data and/or instructions embodied in various computer-readable media, in terms of their behavioral, register transfer, logic component, transistor, layout geometries, and/or other characteristics. Formats of files and other objects in which such circuit expressions may be implemented include, but are not limited to, formats supporting behavioral languages such as C, Verilog, and VHDL, formats supporting register level description languages like RTL, and formats supporting geometry description languages such as GDSII, GDSIII, GDSIV, CIF, MEBES and any other suitable formats and languages. Computer-readable media in which such formatted data and/or instructions may be embodied include, but are not limited to, computer storage media in various forms (e.g., optical, magnetic or semiconductor storage media, whether independently distributed in that manner, or stored “in situ” in an operating system).
When received within a computer system via one or more computer-readable media, such data and/or instruction-based expressions of the above described circuits may be processed by a processing entity (e.g., one or more processors) within the computer system in conjunction with execution of one or more other computer programs including, without limitation, net-list generation programs, place and route programs and the like, to generate a representation or image of a physical manifestation of such circuits. Such representation or image may thereafter be used in device fabrication, for example, by enabling generation of one or more masks that are used to form various components of the circuits in a device fabrication process (i.e., implementing the circuits in an integrated circuit die or dice).
In the foregoing description and in the accompanying drawings, specific terminology and drawing symbols have been set forth to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. In some instances, the terminology and symbols may imply specific details that are not required to practice the invention. For example, any of the specific numbers of bits, signal path widths, signaling or operating frequencies, component circuits or devices and the like may be different from those described above in alternative embodiments. Additionally, the various signaling links and other interconnections between circuit elements or blocks may be shown as buses or as single signal lines. Each of the buses may alternatively be a single signal line, and each of the single signal lines may alternatively be buses. Signals and signaling paths shown or described as being single-ended may also be differential, and vice-versa. A signal driving circuit is said to “output” a signal to a signal receiving circuit when the signal driving circuit asserts (or deasserts, if explicitly stated or indicated by context) the signal on a signal line coupled between the signal driving and signal receiving circuits. The expression “timing signal” is used herein to refer to a signal that controls the timing of one or more actions within an integrated circuit device and includes clock signals, strobe signals and the like. The term “coupled” is used herein to express a direct connection as well as a connection through one or more intervening circuits or structures. Integrated circuit device “programming” may include, for example and without limitation, loading a control value into a register or other storage circuit within the device in response to a host instruction and thus controlling an operational aspect of the device, establishing a device configuration or controlling an operational aspect of the device through a one-time programming operation (e.g., blowing fuses within a configuration circuit during device production), and/or connecting one or more selected pins or other contact structures of the device to reference voltage lines (also referred to as strapping) to establish a particular device configuration or operation aspect of the device. The terms “exemplary” and “embodiment” are used to express an example, not a preference or requirement.
While the invention has been described with reference to specific embodiments thereof, it will be evident that various modifications and changes may be made thereto without departing from the broader spirit and scope. For example, features or aspects of any of the embodiments may be applied, at least where practicable, in combination with any other of the embodiments or in place of counterpart features or aspects thereof. Accordingly, the specification and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/874,324 filed Oct. 2, 2015 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,632,956), which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/499,029 filed Mar. 29, 2012 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,183,166), which is a 35 U.S.C. § 371 U.S. National Stage of International Patent Application No. PCT/US2010/051318 filed Oct. 4, 2010, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/286,371 filed Dec. 14, 2009. Each of the above-identified patent applications is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6769050 | Hampel | Jul 2004 | B1 |
20020161453 | Peltier | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20040186956 | Perego et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040199741 | Floman | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040221106 | Perego | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050010737 | Ware et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20080028127 | Ware | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080034130 | Tsem et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080059687 | Mayer | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080080261 | Shaeffer et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080104456 | Talbot | May 2008 | A1 |
20100077267 | Perego et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100211748 | Perego et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110074623 | Baker | Mar 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO-2009-089301 | Jul 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Extended EP Search Report dated Nov. 4, 2013 in EP Application No. 10841421.0. 4 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability (Chapter I of the PCT) dated Jun. 28, 2012 in International Application No. PCT/US2010/051318. 6 pages. |
International Search Report and the Written Opinion dated Jun. 10, 2011 re Int'l. Application No. PCT/US2010/051318. 10 Pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170249265 A1 | Aug 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61286371 | Dec 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14874324 | Oct 2015 | US |
Child | 15458166 | US | |
Parent | 13499029 | US | |
Child | 14874324 | US |