This invention relates generally to Moineau style power sections useful in subterranean drilling motors, and more specifically to the contouring of elastomer on lobes in the helical portion of stators in such power sections.
Moineau style power sections are well known. They are useful in drilling motors for, e.g., subterranean drilling applications, in which they are used to covert a flow of drilling fluid into torque and rotary power. The general principle on which Moineau style power sections operate involves locating a helical rotor within a stator having a helical cavity. Helical cavity stators, when viewed in circular cross-section, show a series of peaks and valleys. The valleys are where the helical cavity is formed into the inside of the stator. The peaks are typically referred to as “lobes.”
The furthest outside diameter of the rotor is generally selected so as to allow the rotor to rotate within the stator while maintaining close proximity to the lobes on the stator. In most conventional Moineau style power sections, the rotor and the lobes on the stator are preferably an interference fit, with the rotor including one fewer lobes than the stator. Then, when fluid (such as drilling fluid) is passed through the helical spaces between rotor and stator, the flow of fluid causes the rotor to rotate.
Stators in Moineau style power sections typically show at least two components in circular cross-section. The outer portion includes a hollow cylindrical metal tube. The inner portion includes a helical cavity component. The helical cavities are formed in the inner surface of the helical cavity component. The helical cavity component also has a cylindrical outer surface that abuts the inner surface of the hollow metal tube.
Conventional stators in Moineau style power sections also advantageously include elastomer (e.g. rubber) surfaces on the inside of the helical cavities, and preferably on the lobes, to facilitate the interference fit with the rotor. The elastomer provides a resilient surface with which to contact the rotor as the rotor rotates. Many stators are known where the helical cavity component is made substantially entirely of elastomer.
It has been observed in operations using Moineau style power sections that the elastomer portions of the lobes are subject to considerable cyclic deflection. This deflection is caused not only by the interference fit with the rotor, but also by reactive torque from the rotor. The cyclic deflection and rebound of the elastomer causes a build up of heat in the elastomer. In conventional stators, especially those in which the helical cavity component is made substantially entirely from elastomer, the heat build up has been observed to concentrate near the center of the lobe. The heat build up weakens the elastomer, leading to a premature “chunking” breakdown of the elastomer. A cavity in the lobe also eventually develops as the deteriorated elastomer separates and falls away. This causes loss of lobe integrity, which causes loss of interference fit with the rotor, resulting in fluid leakage between rotor and stator as fluid is passed through the power sections. This fluid leakage in turn causes loss of drive torque, and if left unchecked will eventually lead to stalling of the rotor.
In other stators, such as described in exemplary embodiments disclosed in commonly-assigned, co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/694,557, “COMPOSITE MATERIAL PROGRESSING CAVITY STATORS,” the elastomer may be a liner deployed on the helical cavity component, the helical cavity component comprising a fiber reinforced composite reinforcement material for the elastomer liner.
The deployment of a reinforcement material in the lobes addresses the problems of deterioration of an all-elastomer lobe due to heat build up. For example, lower resilience in the reinforcement material is likely to localize resilient displacement in the liner, where, in some embodiments, heat build up may dissipate more quickly. Care is required, however, in selection of reinforcement material and elastomer liner thickness. Contact stresses are caused on the reinforced lobes as the rotor rotates within the interference fit with the stator. Without sufficient resilience in the interference fit, the reinforcement may be too hard and/or the liner may be too thin, such that the contact stresses cause the elastomer liner to crack or split as the rotor contacts the stator lobe. Additionally, without care in choice of materials or elastomer liner thickness, the cyclic contact stresses can cause the lobes to crack or fail prematurely, particularly on the loaded side of the rotor/stator interface.
These and other needs and problems in the prior art are addressed by a stator comprising asymmetrical contouring of elastomer. The inventive stator includes a helical cavity component made from a material chosen to reinforce an elastomer liner deployed thereon. The contouring of the elastomer liner is asymmetrical, such that the elastomer liner is relatively thick on the loaded side of a lobe as compared to its thickness on the unloaded side of the lobe.
It is therefore a technical advantage of the invention to still provide reinforcement to an elastomer surface on the lobes on the helical cavity component. The problems caused by heat build up in the lobes may thus be addressed. At the same time, an elastomer liner is provided with a thickness profile having increased thickness, and therefore increased resilience, on the loaded side of a lobe. This increased resilience deters liner breakdown (or reinforcement breakdown) due to contact stresses between rotor and stator.
According to one aspect of the present invention a stator for use in a Moineau style power section is provided. The stator includes a plurality of internal stator lobes, each of which includes a resilient liner deployed on an interior surface of the stator. The liner is disposed to engage rotor lobes on a helical outer surface of a rotor when the rotor is positioned within the stator so that the rotor lobes are in a rotational interference fit with the stator lobes. Rotation of the rotor in a predetermined direction causes the rotor lobes to contact the stator lobes on a loaded side thereof as the interference fit is encountered and to pass by the stator lobes on a non-loaded side thereof as the interference fit is completed. Each of the stator lobes further includes a reinforcement material for the resilient liner. The stator further includes a shape, when viewed in circular cross section, in which a thickness of the liner is greater on the loaded sides of the stator lobes than on the non-loaded sides thereof.
According to another aspect, this invention includes a subterranean drilling motor. The drilling motor includes a rotor having a plurality of rotor lobes on a helical outer surface thereof and a stator including a helical cavity component. The helical cavity component provides an internal helical cavity and includes a plurality of internal stator lobes. The rotor is deployable in the helical cavity of the stator such that the rotor lobes are in a rotational interference fit with the stator lobes. Rotation of the rotor in a predetermined direction causes the rotor lobes to contact the stator lobes on a loaded side thereof as the interference fit is encountered and to pass by the stator lobes on a non-loaded side thereof as the interference fit is completed. The stator lobes include a reinforcement material and a resilient liner, the liner disposed to engage an outer surface of the rotor. The liner has a non-uniform thickness such that it is thicker on the loaded sides of the lobes than on the non-loaded sides of the lobes.
Certain exemplary embodiments of this invention may also include at least one transition layer separating the liner and the reinforcement material, the transition layers made from material that is less resilient than the liner, but more resilient than the reinforcement material.
The foregoing has outlined rather broadly the features and technical advantages of the present invention in order that the detailed description of the invention that follows may be better understood. Additional features and advantages of the invention will be described hereinafter which form the subject of the claims of the invention. It should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the conception and the specific embodiment disclosed may be readily utilized as a basis for modifying or designing other structures for carrying out the same purposes of the present invention. It should also be realized by those skilled in the art that such equivalent constructions do not depart from the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims.
For a more complete understanding of the present invention, and the advantages thereof, reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
As noted above, in view of contact stresses in the interference fit between rotor 250 and lobes 260, care is required in the selection of the thickness of elastomer liner 212 in stators 205 such as shown in
In the exemplary embodiments shown on
It will also be appreciated that the invention is also not limited to any particular cross-sectional shape of thicker portions 380. For example only,
In other embodiments, such as the exemplary embodiment shown on
With regard to transition layer embodiments, it will be appreciated that the invention is not limited to the foregoing description of the exemplary embodiment shown on
Although the present invention and its advantages have been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions and alternations can be made herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/514,848 entitled Asymmetric Contouring of Elastomer Liner on Lobes in Moineau Style Power Section Stator, filed Oct. 27, 2003.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2527673 | Byram | Oct 1950 | A |
3084631 | Bourke | Apr 1963 | A |
3139035 | O'Connor | Jun 1964 | A |
3417664 | Brucker | Dec 1968 | A |
3499389 | Seeberger et al. | Mar 1970 | A |
3822972 | Ogly et al. | Jul 1974 | A |
3840080 | Berryman | Oct 1974 | A |
3857654 | Streicher | Dec 1974 | A |
3912426 | Tschirky | Oct 1975 | A |
3975120 | Tschirky | Aug 1976 | A |
4104009 | Chanton | Aug 1978 | A |
4144001 | Streicher | Mar 1979 | A |
4265323 | Juergens | May 1981 | A |
4415316 | Jurgens | Nov 1983 | A |
4558991 | Barr | Dec 1985 | A |
4614232 | Jurgens et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4636151 | Eppink | Jan 1987 | A |
4676725 | Eppink | Jun 1987 | A |
4718824 | Cholet et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4863359 | Unterstrasser et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
5090497 | Beimgraben et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5145342 | Gruber | Sep 1992 | A |
5171138 | Forrest | Dec 1992 | A |
5171139 | Underwood et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5759019 | Wood et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
6019583 | Wood | Feb 2000 | A |
6183226 | Wood et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6241494 | Pafitis et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6309195 | Bottos et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6427787 | Jager | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6543132 | Krueger et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6568076 | Bottos et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6604921 | Plop et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6716008 | Kachele | Apr 2004 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2017620 | Apr 1976 | DE |
3322095 | Dec 1984 | DE |
2081812 | Feb 1982 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050089430 A1 | Apr 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60514848 | Oct 2003 | US |