Many optical fabrics direct an incoming and outgoing optical beam along the same optical path. Such optical fabrics may include optical switches, waveblockers and optical attenuators.
It would be desirable to provide a launch optics arrangement that is less complex and costly for use with an optical fabric such as the wavelength blocker array described above.
In accordance with one aspect of the invention an optical launch arrangement is provided which includes a fiber assembly for securing an array of optical fibers. The optical launch arrangement also includes an asymmetric lenslet array having a first surface with a pair of coupling lenses in registration with each optical fiber in the array of optical fibers and a second surface with a collimating lens in registration with each pair of coupling lenses.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, an optical switch includes a fiber assembly for securing an array of optical fibers and an asymmetric lenslet array having a first surface with a pair of coupling lenses in registration with each optical fiber in the array of optical fibers and a second surface with a combining lens in registration with each pair of coupling lenses. The optical switch also includes a MEMs mirror array. Each of the MEMS mirrors is positioned to receive an optical beam from one of the combining lenses.
a and 11b show a top view and side view, respectively, of one example of a 1×N wave blocker array which employs a launch optics arrangement as shown in
A fiber array is normally secured in a V-groove array or assembly, one example of which is shown in various perspective views in
In a conventional arrangement the collimated beams provided at the output of the V-groove array may be directed to a lenslet array having a series of coupling lens on an input surface and a corresponding series of collimating lens on an output surface. Each coupling lens is in registration with one of the collimating lenses and each coupling lens is aligned with one of the waveguide outputs in the V-groove array. While the lenslet array ensures that the collimated beams provided by the V-groove array are all parallel to one another, it does not avoid the need for circulators or the like when used as a launch optics arrangement which can separate incoming and outgoing beams.
Instead of using a symmetric lenslet array of the type described above, which is symmetric in the sense that it has the same number of coupling and collimating lenses, the V-groove array 250 can be combined with an asymmetric lenslet array to form a launch optics arrangement that is compact and relatively inexpensive to produce and does not require circulators or other optical elements. In an asymmetric lenslet array, the number of coupling lenses is different from the number of collimating lenses.
The pitch of the coupling lenses 212 is the same as the pitch of the waveguides formed in the v-groove array. Accordingly, as seen in
V-groove array 250 and lenslet array 200 may be mounted on a common substrate 280. As most easily seen in
In operation, a light beam from each fiber enters and exits one of the waveguide cores 103 in the V-groove array 250. The beam from each waveguide is communicated into the lenslet array 200 through one of the coupling lenses 212 and spreads out before reaching one of the collimating lenses 214. Two overlapping beams are thus incident upon each collimating lens 214. That is, a beam from each of the lenses 212 in a given coupling lens pair 210 is directed to the collimating lens 214 with which it is in registration. In this way two fibers in the fiber array secured in the V-groove array 250 effectively direct two overlapping beams coming in at slightly different angles to one of the collimating lenses 214.
The launch optics arrangement may be used as the input/output of an optical fabric such as the wavelength blocker array described above. The arrangement creates a spatially overlapped, angularly multiplexed beam that is focused at a virtual focal point (e.g., focal point 118 in
In the simplest case, the launch optics arrangement shown herein includes a V-groove array that can accommodate two fibers and an asymmetric lenslet array having a single pair of coupling lenses in registration with a single collimating lens. Two beams that are incident upon the fibers enter the launch optics arrangement, which provides a multiplexed output beam at a virtual focus.
The coupling lenses 212 in an asymmetric lenslet array may or may not be configured the same. For instance, in some embodiments the curvature of the individual coupling lenses 212 may be spatially dependent in order to optimize various features of the optical systems in order to correct for such things as field curvature, for example. In addition, the coupling lenses 212 may provide different refractive strengths in different axes of the lenses in order to tailor asymmetric beams.
In another variation, the position of the coupling lenses 212 in some embodiments of the asymmetric lenslet array may not be aligned with the waveguide outputs 260 of the V-groove array. Rather, they may be offset with respect to one another in order to perform a spatial translation of the beams as they exit the asymmetric lenslet array.
Proper alignment among the fibers in the fiber array, the waveguides 103 in the V-groove 250 and the lenses in the asymmetric lenslet array can be accomplished in a number of different ways. This process can be particularly important because the tolerance of the focal lengths of the lenses in the lenslet arrays may be too great for some applications. In one example, a mirror is placed at the virtual focal point and an optical beam is launched into one coupling lens in a coupling lens pair and detected as it exits the other couplings lens in the coupling lens pair. The various components (i.e., the V-groove array 250, the asymmetric lenslet array 200 and the substrate 280) may then be adjusted in order to maximize the coupling efficiency between the input and output coupling lenses in the coupling lens pair. This process may be performed for all or a selected number of the coupling lens pairs. For instance, it may be convenient to maximize the coupling efficiency for a coupling lens pair in the middle and at each end of the asymmetric lenslet array while positional adjustments are made. Once the components are properly aligned, they may be bonded with UV epoxy, for example. Additional details concerning this active alignment process is described below in connection with
Another example of a wavelength blocker array that may use a launch optics arrangement of the type described above is shown in
The launch optics arrangement described above may also be used as a simple switch by placing one or more mirrors at the virtual focal point, with up to one mirror for each coupling lens pair. In one implementation the mirrors may be provided in the form of a DMD. By actuating the individual mirrors the optical communication path between the input and output can be switched on and off. Additional details concerning the use of this arrangement as a fiber array switch device is presented below in connection with
The function of the switch 500 is to couple the light from one fiber to its neighbor. Light exiting fiber 1 is collimated by the coupling lens 540 on side 560 of the micro lens array 510. This beam passes thru the micro lens array 510 and is focused by the combining lens 550 on side 570 onto one of the MEMS mirrors in the MEMs mirror array 530. When the MEMS mirror is oriented normally, the beam will reflect off the MEMs mirrors back into the combining lens 550 where it will be recollimated and pass thru the micro lens array onto the neighboring coupling lens. This coupling lens then focuses the beam back onto fiber 2. In this way all of the fibers in the array are coupled in pairs. When the MEMS mirror is tilted away from the normal, the beam is dumped and no connection is made.
An array of 1×2 switches could be made with a micro lens array where the combiner couples 3 neighboring fibers.
b shows a two component assembly where the micro lens array (referred to above as an asymmetric lenslet array) is bonded to a mounting surface on the fiber array. Proper functioning of the fiber array-micro lens array assembly depends on accurate alignment of the two components.
a and 11b show a top view and side view, respectively, of one example of a 1×N wave blocker array which employs a fiber array-micro lens array launch optical arrangement as described above. The design consists of a linear fiber array (FA) followed by a double sided, micro lens array (ML) (i.e, the asymmetric lenslet assembly discussed above). The fiber array consists of 2N fibers sandwiched between V-groove plates. The exit face of the V-groove plate is often polished at an angle to prevent back reflections. The fibers in the array are equally spaced. Typical fiber spacing (pitch) is 125 or 250 microns. The micro lens array has a linear array of lenses on each side. The side facing the fiber array has 2N collimating lens, one for each fiber. These lenses are equally spaced having the same pitch as the fiber array. The side facing the DMD has a linear array of N coupling lenses having a pitch of twice the fiber pitch. This double sided micro lens array is designed to couple the light from adjacent fibers by overlapping their images at the launch plane (LP). The micro lens array is followed by a collimating lens (CL), a diffraction grating (G), a scan lens (SL), a compensating prism (P), and finally a MEMS micro mirror array here referred to as “DMD.”
To understand the operation of the device, it is helpful to consider rays in top view and side view separately. The rays in the top view show the wavelength filtering operation of the device. Light exiting the fiber under consideration is collimated by a collimating lens on the front side of the microlens array. The collimated beam passes thru the micro lens array and is then focused by a coupling lens onto the “launch plane”. The collimating lens recollimates this beam. The grating (G) then diffracts the collimated beam according to the grating equation. The scan lens (SL) focuses the spectrally dispersed beams onto the DMD mirror surface. If the DMD is set to pass a given wavelength, this beam will reflect off the DMD mirror and travel back thru the system to the neighboring exit fiber.
The side view shown in
Although the side view shows the operation of only one coupled fiber pair (port), the coupling described above occurs for all of the fiber pairs. Note, however, that because the DMD is tilted, the distance from the scan lens to the DMD varies from port to port. The function of the compensating prism (P) is to exactly correct this path length difference so that all ports come to a focus on the DMD.
Having described and illustrated the principles of our innovations in the detailed description and accompanying drawings, it will be recognized that the various embodiments can be modified in arrangement and detail without departing from such principles. It should be understood that the programs, processes, or methods described herein are not related or limited to any particular type of computing environment, unless indicated otherwise. Various types of general purpose or specialized computing environments may be used with or perform operations in accordance with the teachings described herein. Elements of embodiments shown in software may be implemented in hardware and vice versa.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/526,791, filed Aug. 24, 2011, entitled “ASYMMETRIC LENSLET ARRAY,” the entire disclosure of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5412506 | Feldblum et al. | May 1995 | A |
5742720 | Kobayashi et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
6078708 | de la Tocnay et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6339503 | Derstine et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6430328 | Culver et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6618517 | Ducellier et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6768834 | Gruhlke | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6956687 | Moon et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7004645 | Lemoff et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7092599 | Frisken | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7123833 | Szczepanek et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7126740 | Szczepanek et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7231106 | Basavanhally et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7397980 | Frisken | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7764428 | Hayashi et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
20020031301 | Sasaki et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020097957 | Kikuchi et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020186922 | Hananaka | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020196520 | Marom et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030002783 | Neilson et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030002789 | Boye et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030012486 | Ducellier et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030231829 | Meyers et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20050008283 | Brophy et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050063643 | Watanabe et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20060165351 | Hamanaka et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070127326 | Nakajima | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070258678 | Terada et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080193082 | Hamada | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20130064507 | Mahnkopf et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130084039 | Doany et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1281991 | May 2003 | EP |
10-142458 | May 1998 | JP |
Entry |
---|
European Search Report from corresponding EP application No. 12006027.2-1234 dated Jan. 9, 2013, 6 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130051726 A1 | Feb 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61526791 | Aug 2011 | US |