Asymmetric mitral annuloplasty band

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11938027
  • Patent Number
    11,938,027
  • Date Filed
    Friday, October 14, 2022
    a year ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 26, 2024
    a month ago
Abstract
An annuloplasty band and method of implantation. The band is shaped and sized to avoid the adjacent aortic valve structure and better protects against dehiscence along the muscular mitral annulus. The band is asymmetric and when implanted spans more around the side of the mitral annulus having the posterior commissure than the side with the anterior commissure. The band has a saddle shape with a posterior upward bow centered on a minor axis of the mitral annulus, and a span extending clockwise therefrom is longer than a span extending counter-clockwise. The longer span may be 150° while the shorter span extends 90°. A set of rings may have different saddle profiles and different plan view shapes for different sized bands. A method includes implanting so that the band extends over the posterior leaflet and a short distance past the posterior commissure outside of the anterior leaflet.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates generally to annuloplasty bands, and particularly to a mitral annuloplasty band.


BACKGROUND

In vertebrate animals, the heart is a hollow muscular organ having four pumping chambers: the left and right atria and the left and right ventricles, each provided with its own one-way valve. The natural heart valves are identified as the aortic, mitral (or bicuspid), tricuspid and pulmonary, and are each mounted in an annulus comprising dense fibrous rings attached either directly or indirectly to the atrial and ventricular muscle fibers. Each annulus defines a flow orifice. The four valves ensure that blood does not flow in the wrong direction during the cardiac cycle; that is, to ensure that the blood does not back flow through the valve. Blood flows from the venous system and right atrium through the tricuspid valve to the right ventricle, then from the right ventricle through the pulmonary valve to the pulmonary artery and the lungs. Oxygenated blood then flows through the mitral valve from the left atrium to the left ventricle, and finally from the left ventricle through the aortic valve to the aorta/arterial system.


The mitral and tricuspid valves are defined by fibrous rings of collagen, each called an annulus, which forms a part of the fibrous skeleton of the heart. The annulus provides peripheral attachments for the two cusps or leaflets of the mitral valve (called the anterior and posterior cusps) and the three cusps or leaflets of the tricuspid valve. The native valve leaflets flex outward when the valve opens and their free edges come together or coapt in closure.


The free edges of the mitral leaflets connect to chordae tendineae from more than one papillary muscle. Mitral valve malfunction can result from the chordae tendineae (the chords) becoming stretched, and in some cases tearing. Also, a normally structured valve may not function properly because of an enlargement of or shape change in the valve annulus. This condition is referred to as a dilation of the annulus and generally results from heart muscle failure. In addition, the valve may be defective at birth or because of an acquired disease. From a number of etiologies, mitral valve dysfunction can occur when the leaflets do not coapt at peak contraction pressures. As a result, an undesired back flow of blood from the left ventricle into the left atrium can occur.


Various surgical techniques may be used to repair a diseased or damaged valve. A commonly used repair technique effective in treating incompetence is annuloplasty, which often involves reshaping the annulus by attaching a prosthetic annuloplasty repair segment or ring thereto. For instance, the goal of a posterior mitral annulus repair is to bring the posterior mitral leaflet forward toward to the anterior leaflet to better allow coaptation. The annuloplasty ring is designed to support the functional changes that occur during the cardiac cycle: maintaining coaptation and valve integrity to prevent reverse flow while permitting good hemodynamics during forward flow.


The annuloplasty ring typically comprises an inner substrate or core of a metal such as a rod or multiple bands of stainless steel or titanium, or a flexible material such as silicone rubber or polyethylene terephthalate (PET) (e.g., Dacron® PET, Invista, Wichita, Kansas) cordage, covered with a biocompatible fabric or cloth to allow the ring to be sutured to the fibrous annulus tissue. More rigid cores are typically surrounded by an outer cover of both silicone and fabric as a suture-permeable anchoring margin. Annuloplasty rings may be stiff or flexible, and may have a variety of shapes in plan view, including continuous oval, circular, D-shaped, or kidney-shaped, or discontinuous C-shaped, sometimes referred to as a band. Examples are seen in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,041,130, 5,104,407, 5,201,880, 5,258,021, 5,607,471 and, 6,187,040. Most rigid and semi-rigid annular rings for the mitral valve have a kidney-like or D shape, with a curved posterior segment co-extensive with the posterior valve leaflet, and a somewhat straighter anterior segment co-extensive with the anterior valve leaflet.


One popular annuloplasty ring is the partially flexible Carpentier-Edwards Physio® ring available from Edwards Lifesciences of Irvine, CA The Physio® ring is a “semi-rigid” ring because it offers selective flexibility at the posterior section while preserving the remodeling effect through a rigid anterior section. The newer Physio II® ring from Edwards Lifesciences also features up and down curves to better fit the nonplanar contours of the mitral annulus. Various other rings have posterior bows, e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,805,710 and 6,858,039, 7,959,673, or other three-dimensional configurations.


Despite numerous designs presently available or proposed in the past, there is a need for an annuloplasty ring that better accounts for the native mitral annulus anatomy.


SUMMARY

The present invention provides an annuloplasty band shaped and sized to avoid the adjacent aortic valve structure and better protects against dehiscence along the muscular mitral annulus. The band is asymmetric in that when implanted it spans more around one side of the mitral annulus than the other. In general, the band extends over the posterior leaflet and a short distance past the posterior commissure outside of the anterior leaflet. Looking down on the mitral valve with the anterior leaflet on top and the posterior leaflet at bottom, a vertical minor axis can be drawn through the midpoint of both leaflets on which is oriented a minor dimension of the mitral annulus. The annuloplasty band is discontinuous with a mid-section and two free ends, one on either side of the minor axis, and asymmetrically implants farther around the mitral annulus toward the posterior commissure than toward the anterior commissure so that the circumferential length to the right is greater than to the left. Stated another way, the asymmetric position of the implanted band is rotated in a counter-clockwise (CCW) direction around the mitral annulus from a symmetric position where the center of the band lies on the minor axis. Further, the exemplary annuloplasty band has an upward rise or bow in its mid-section that remains centered on the minor axis such that lengths of the band on either side of the high point of the rise are dissimilar. Specifically, a length extending around the mitral annulus counter-clockwise (CCW) from the high point of the rise is longer than a length extending clockwise (CW). The exemplary discontinuous mitral annuloplasty bands disclosed herein have gaps or openings between their free ends that are configured or adapted to be positioned against or adjacent the location of the aortic valve around the mitral annulus. This avoids the fibrous structure associated with the aortic valve, and better protects against dehiscence along the muscular mitral annulus.


The various asymmetrical mitral annuloplasty bands disclosed herein are adapted for implant against a mitral valve annulus. The mitral valve annulus has a posterior aspect to which a posterior leaflet attaches and an anterior aspect to which an anterior leaflet attaches. The annulus generally defines a D- or kidney-shape looking at an inflow side thereof with the anterior aspect being straighter than the more rounded posterior aspect and a minor axis intersecting and extending across the annulus between mid-points on the anterior and posterior aspects being shorter than a major axis perpendicular thereto intersecting and extending across the annulus, and wherein an anterior commissure and a posterior commissure are located on the annulus at the two junctions between the two leaflets with the anterior commissure located clockwise from the mid-point of the posterior leaflet and the posterior commissure located counter-clockwise from the mid-point of the posterior leaflet. The annulus also generally defines a saddle shape where the annulus rises up toward the left atrium at mid-points of both the anterior aspect and the posterior aspect. In various embodiments, the annuloplasty bands may be D- or kidney-shaped, oval, planar or three-dimensional.


A first embodiment of the asymmetrical mitral annuloplasty band has an elongated discontinuous body including an inner generally rigid core surrounded by a suture-permeable interface, the body defining an asymmetric shape that generally conforms to the shape of the mitral annulus and extends around the entire posterior aspect ending at a first free end located approximately at the intersection of the major axis and the annulus and extending farther around on the opposite side past the intersection of the major axis and the annulus into the anterior aspect and ending at a second free end.


A second embodiment of the asymmetrical mitral annuloplasty band has an elongated discontinuous body including an inner generally rigid core surrounded by a suture-permeable interface, the body defining an asymmetric shape commencing at a first free end adapted to be implanted adjacent the anterior commissure, a mid-section that extends in a counter-clockwise (CCW) direction around the posterior aspect past the posterior commissure into the anterior aspect and ending at a second free end.


And finally a third embodiment of the asymmetrical mitral annuloplasty band has an elongated discontinuous body including an inner generally rigid core surrounded by a suture-permeable interface, the body defining an asymmetric shape that generally conforms to the shape of the mitral annulus and extends around the entire posterior aspect and includes an upward bow corresponding with the rise in the posterior aspect, wherein the body extends clockwise along a first span from a mid-point of the upward bow to a first free and extends farther along a second span from a mid-point of the upward bow to a second free end.


In any of the first three band embodiments, a total circumferential span of the body preferably extends between about 58-67% around the mitral annulus. For example, wherein a first circumferential span of a portion of the body counterclockwise from a mid-point of the posterior aspect extends between about 37-42% around the mitral annulus, and a second circumferential span of a portion of the body clockwise from the mid-point of the posterior aspect extends between about 21-25% around the mitral annulus. Additionally, the first free end may be adapted to be implanted at the annulus on the major axis. The first free end is preferably adapted to be implanted adjacent the anterior commissure and the ring body extends in a counter-clockwise direction to the second free end within the anterior aspect.


In one of the first two band embodiments, the body may also include an upward bow centered at a mid-point of the posterior aspect. Preferably, the body has a partial saddle shape with a first high point at the upward bow, two low points located approximately at the first free end and at a location directly opposite the first free end, and a second high point at the second free end. In addition, the body may have a partial saddle shape with a first high point at the upward bow, two low points located approximately at the first free end and at a location directly opposite the first free end, and a second high point at the second free end.


In a fourth embodiment, an asymmetrical mitral annuloplasty band includes a top, a bottom, a first end, a second end, and a rigid or semi-rigid body extending between the first end and the second end, the body including a first portion and a second portion. The first portion extends counterclockwise along a path from a reference point and terminating at the first end. The second portion extends clockwise along the path from the reference point and terminating at the second end. A length of the first portion is substantially different from a length of the second portion, wherein a top view of the path has an oval, D-shape, or a kidney shape with a horizontal major axis and a vertical minor axis defining a clockface, the reference point is at 6:00, the minor axis intersects the path at 12:00 and 6:00, and the major axis intersects the path at 3:00 and 9:00 with a flatter portion of the D-shape or kidney shape above the major axis.


With regard to the fourth band embodiment, the top view of the path is preferably D-shaped, and the first portion of the body is longer than the second portion. The first portion preferably extends counterclockwise past 3:00, such as the first end being disposed at about 1:30 or even at about 1:00. In one embodiment, the second portion does not extend clockwise to 9:00, and may extend only to about 8:30, although the second portion makes it all the way to 9:00.


A fifth embodiment of an asymmetrical mitral annuloplasty band comprising a rigid or semi-rigid open band having a top and a bottom and comprising a posterior portion and an anterior portion extending from an end of the posterior portion. When viewed in plan view, the open band extends around a portion of a D- or kidney-shape having a major axis and defining a longer side having a first perimeter and a shorter side having a second perimeter shorter than the first perimeter. The major axis and D- or kidney-shape share a first intersection and a second intersection, and the D- or kidney shape has a minor axis that shares a third intersection with the longer side and a fourth intersection with the shorter side. The posterior portion of the open band extends from the first intersection along the longer side of the D- or kidney-shape, and the anterior portion of the open band extends from the first intersection along the shorter side of the D- or kidney-shape.


In the fifth embodiment of asymmetrical mitral annuloplasty band, when viewed from the top, the longer side is on the bottom and the shorter side is on the top, the first intersection is to the right and the second intersection is to the left. The posterior portion preferably does not extend to the second intersection of the D- or kidney-shape, or the posterior portion may extend to about the second intersection of the D- or kidney-shape. The anterior portion desirably does not extend to the fourth intersection.


In either of the fourth or fifth band embodiments, the asymmetrical annuloplasty band has a saddle shape with peaks at the about the intersections with the minor major axis. Preferably, the saddle shape has valleys at about the intersections with the major axis. Further, the body may have a core and a suture permeable cover disposed over the core. The core may comprise at least one of cobalt-chromium alloy, titanium alloy, stainless steel, or, and may be a solid core, a plurality of bands, or a braided core. The suture permeable cover preferably includes an elastomeric sleeve disposed around the core and a fabric outer cover disposed over the elastomeric sleeve. The suture permeable cover also may have a radially outwardly projecting sewing flange.


Another aspect of the present application is a set of progressively saddled asymmetrical mitral annuloplasty bands comprising a plurality of sizes of any of the asymmetrical mitral annuloplasty bands described above, wherein a ratio of height of the saddle to size of the asymmetrical mitral annuloplasty band is not constant. For example, the ratio of height to size increases with size, or the ratio of height to size varies continuously with size. At a minimum, the ratio of height to size varies in at least one step with size. Also, a ratio of length of the minor axis to size in the set of bands may not be constant. For instance, the ratio of length of the minor axis to size increases with size and may vary continuously with size. At a minimum, the ratio varies in at least one step with size.


Other aspects of the present application are methods of repairing a mitral valve in need thereof, the mitral valve comprising an anterior leaflet including regions A1, A2, and A3; a posterior leaflet including regions P1, P2, and P3; an anterio-medial commissure; a posterio-lateral commissure; and two trigones.


A first method includes securing a mitral band to an annulus of a mitral valve with a first end thereof proximate to the anterior leaflet, a body thereof extending around one of the anterio-medial commissure or the posterio-lateral commissure; and a second end thereof proximate to the posterior leaflet, or the other of the anterio-medial commissure or the posterio-lateral commissure


A second method of repairing a mitral valve in need comprises securing a mitral band comprising a first end and a second end to an annulus of a mitral valve with the first end proximate to the anterior leaflet and the second end not proximate to the anterior leaflet.


And finally a third method of repairing a mitral valve includes securing a mitral band comprising a first end and a second end to an annulus of a mitral valve with the first end proximate to the anterior leaflet, wherein the mitral band is asymmetric relative to a plane passing through A2 and P2.


In the methods described above, securing the mitral band preferably comprises securing the first end proximate to A3; and the second end proximate to P1 or the anterio-medial commissure. Also, securing the mitral band desirably comprises securing the mitral band to follow the natural saddle shape of the annulus of the mitral valve.


A further understanding of the nature and advantages of the invention will become apparent by reference to the remaining portions of the specification and drawings.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Features and advantages of the present invention will become appreciated as the same become better understood with reference to the specification, claims, and appended drawings wherein:



FIG. 1 is a superior or plan view of a healthy mitral valve, with the leaflets closed and coapting at peak contraction pressures during ventricular systole and indicating the primary anatomical landmarks as well as diagram lines indicating the circumferential reach of bands of the present application;



FIG. 2 is a plan view of a mitral valve as in FIG. 1 with an exemplary annuloplasty band of the present application shown implanted therearound;



FIGS. 3A-3D are elevational and plan views of an exemplary annuloplasty band of the present invention;



FIGS. 4A and 4B are sectional views of the exemplary annuloplasty band taken along corresponding sections lines in FIG. 3B;



FIGS. 5A-5C are elevational and plan views of an exemplary inner core for the annuloplasty band of FIGS. 3A-3D; and



FIGS. 6A and 6B are sections views of the inner core taken along corresponding sections lines in FIG. 5A.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF CERTAIN EMBODIMENTS

The present application discloses an asymmetric mitral annuloplasty band that avoids the adjacent aortic valve structure and better protects against dehiscence along the muscular mitral annulus. The term “band” is used here since the implant is a discontinuous ring, although in some contexts such implants are also termed “rings”. Indeed, the bands disclosed herein define shapes that circumscribe a majority of the mitral annulus, and thus trace most of a ring shape. A complete ring shape may be constructed, and indeed the shape of the bands may be defined, by imagining an extension of the shape between and connecting the free ends. For example, the preferred plan view shape of the disclosed bands is kidney or D-shaped so as to conform to the peripheral shape of the usual mitral annulus. Therefore “band” and “ring” are synonymous, the disclosed band or ring simply being discontinuous so as to have two free ends.


The term “axis” in reference to the illustrated annuloplasty bands, and other non-circular or non-planar bands, refers to a line generally through the centroid of the band or ring periphery when viewed in plan view. “Axial” or the direction of the “axis” can also be viewed as being parallel to the average direction of blood flow within the valve orifice and thus within the band when implanted therein. Stated another way, an implanted mitral band or ring orients about a central flow axis aligned along an average direction of blood flow through the mitral annulus from the left atrium to the left ventricle.



FIG. 1 is a plan view of the mitral valve with posterior being down and anterior being up. In a healthy heart, the annulus of the mitral valve MV creates an anatomic shape and tension such that a posterior leaflet PL and an anterior leaflet AL coapt in the flow orifice, forming a tight junction, at peak contraction or systolic pressures, as seen in FIG. 1. The mitral valve MV annulus has a posterior aspect to which the posterior leaflet PL attaches and an anterior aspect to which the anterior leaflet AL attaches. Where the leaflets meet at the opposing medial and lateral sides of the annulus are called the leaflet commissures: the anterior (or more accurately, the anterio-medial) commissure AC, and the posterior (or posterio-lateral) commissure PC. The posterior leaflet is divided into three scallops or cusps, sometimes identified as P1, P2, and P3, starting from the anterior commissure and continuing in a counterclockwise direction to the posterior commissure. The posterior scallops P1, P2, and P3 circumscribe particular arcs around the periphery of the posterior aspect of the annulus, which may vary depending on a variety of factors, including actual measurement of the mitral valve posterior leaflet scallops, and surgeon preference. As a rule, however, a major axis 22 of the mitral annulus intersects both the first and third posterior scallops P1 and P3, approximately at the commissures AC, PC, and a minor axis 24 intersects and generally bisects the middle posterior scallop P2. The anterior leaflet also features scallops or regions labeled A1, A2, and A3 as indicated in FIG. 1.


The mitral anterior leaflet AL attaches to the fibrous portion FA of the mitral annulus, which makes up about one-third of the total mitral annulus circumference. The muscular portion of the mitral annulus constitutes the remainder of the mitral annulus, and the posterior leaflet PL attaches thereto. The anterior fibrous annulus FA, the two ends of which are called the fibrous trigones T, forms part of the central fibrous body of the heart. The anterior commissure AC and the posterior commissure PC are located just posterior to each fibrous trigone.


The fibrous mitral valve annulus FA is intimate with or adjacent to the aortic valve AV, in particular the left coronary sinus LCS and non-coronary sinus NCS. The central fibrous body is fairly resistant to elongation, and thus the great majority of mitral annulus dilation occurs in the posterior two-thirds of the annulus, or around the muscular mitral annulus.


In a preferred embodiment, the mitral annuloplasty bands disclosed herein comprise discontinuous rings defining a kidney or D-shape with a substantially complete posterior segment centered about a minor axis of the band. Further, the annuloplasty band defines two anterior segments with free ends opposite each other and having differing lengths extending from the posterior segment. The different lengths of the two anterior segments of the band create an asymmetry which is imbalanced toward the posterior commissure.


To better define the contours of the asymmetric annuloplasty band disclosed herein, FIG. 1 illustrates a circumferential span 30 around the mitral annulus, generally illustrating the range of lengths of the band. More particularly, the longest length of band extends around in a counter-clockwise (CCW) direction between a radial angular location 32 at the anterior commissure AC to a radial angular location 34 that is within the fibrous mitral annulus and above the posterior commissure PC. It will be understood that the asymmetric band extends around the mitral annulus in a span that avoids the adjacent aortic valve structures of the left coronary sinus LCS and non-coronary sinus NCS. The aortic valve AV is believed to be located slightly offset from the minor axis 24 as shown. In addition, the portion of the right side of the band that extends around to the posterior commissure PC provides reinforcement and reduces dehiscence, or suture pull-out, in that area. In general, the band extends circumferentially around the posterior leaflet PL and a short distance past the posterior commissure PC around the anterior leaflet AL.


To help better define this span, clock positions may be assigned relative to the major axis 22 and minor axis 24 of the mitral valve MV; that is, the vertical minor axis 24 extends between and defines 12:00 and 6:00, and the horizontal major axis 22 extends between and defines 3:00 and 9:00. Using this nomenclature, the longest band illustrated in FIG. 1 extends between radial location 32 at about 9:00 and radial location 34 at about 1:00. Of course, these geometries may be expressed in percent of a continuous ring or in degrees, and the aforementioned largest span 30 therefore is about 67% around the mitral annulus or about 240°.


The radial locations 32, 34 correspond to the free ends of the band. Each free end may be independently shortened as indicated to secondary radial locations 36 and 38. Radial location 36 is at about 8:30 and radial location 38 is at about 1:30. Consequently, the shortest band may span about 58% around the mitral annulus or about 210°. Intermediate bands where one end is shortened but not the other are also contemplated, corresponding to bands spanning about 62% around the mitral annulus or 225°.



FIG. 2 illustrates the mitral valve and anatomical landmarks with an exemplary annuloplasty band 40 secured thereto. The band 40 is shaped and sized to avoid the adjacent aortic valve AV structure and better protects against dehiscence along the muscular mitral annulus. The band 40 is asymmetric when implanted in that it extends farther around one side of the mitral annulus than around the other. That is, it is asymmetric relative to the minor axis 24 of the annulus. Looking down on the mitral valve as in FIG. 2, the vertical minor axis 24 extends through the midpoint of both leaflets AL, PL. The annuloplasty band 40 is discontinuous with a mid-section 42 and two free ends 44a, 44b, one on either side of the minor axis 24. The band 40 asymmetrically extends farther CCW around the mitral annulus toward the posterior commissure PC than CW toward the anterior commissure AC so that its circumferential length to the right is larger or longer than to the left. Stated another way, the asymmetric position of the implanted band 40 is rotated in a counter-clockwise (CCW) direction around the mitral annulus from a symmetric position so that the circumferential center of the band (located at about number 46) lies CCW from the minor axis 24.


As seen in FIGS. 3A-3D, the exemplary annuloplasty band 40 has a gentle upward rise or bow 50 along a vertical axis 48 in its mid-section 42 that remains centered on the minor axis 24. (The vertical axis 48 is perpendicular to both the major axis 22 and minor axis 24 and extends through their intersection.) The bow 50 diminishes on either side of the minor axis 24 to low points around the ring at about the major axis 22. Since the first free end 44a lies on or adjacent the major axis 22 it also generally corresponds to a first one of the low points. A second low point 52 occurs in the band mid-section 42 along the major axis 22 opposite to the first free end 44a. The band 40 then rises up from the second low point 52 toward the second free end 44b. If the band 40 were continuous, as indicated by the dashed line extension 54 in FIG. 3C, it would define a saddle shape with both the anterior and posterior sections bowed upward (convex up) with the sides that cross the major axis 22 being curved downward (convex down). Of course, this discussion refers to a relative orientation in which “up” corresponds to the left atrium and “down” to the left ventricle, so that blood flows downward through the annulus.


As seen in FIGS. 2, 3A, and the bottom view of FIG. 3C, the upward bow 50 of the annuloplasty band 40 is centered on the minor axis 24 such that lengths of the band on either side of the high point of the bow are dissimilar. Specifically, a first span 60 that extends counter-clockwise (CCW) from the high point of the bow 50 at the minor axis 24 is longer than a second span 62 that extends clockwise (CW) (directions are reversed in the bottom view of FIG. 3C). As explained above, the spans of the band 40 on either side of the minor axis 24 differ, with the first span 60 extending past the posterior commissure PC of the mitral annulus and the second span 62 extending approximately to or just short of the anterior commissure AC. Using the aforementioned expressions, the first span 60 extends CCW from the minor axis 24 to a farthest extent of about 1:00 or about 42%)(150° around the mitral annulus, while the second span 62 extends CW from the minor axis 24 to a farthest extent of about 9:00 or about 25%)(90° around the mitral annulus. Further, the first and second spans 60, 62 may independently be somewhat shorter, as indicated by the radial lines 36 and 38 in FIG. 1.



FIGS. 4A and 4B are sections views of the annuloplasty band 40 taken along corresponding sections lines in FIG. 3B. In a preferred embodiment, the band construction includes a relatively rigid or semi-rigid inner core 70 surrounded by a suture-permeable interface that may include an elastomeric sleeve 72 closely surrounding the core and a fabric outer cover 74, for example, a polyethylene terephthalate (PET) fabric cover. In the preferred embodiment the elastomeric sleeve 72, which may be silicone rubber, is molded to have an outwardly-extending flange 76 to facilitate suturing of the band 40 to the mitral annulus. The band 40 may be secured with sutures, staples, or other such devices to an inside ledge of the mitral annulus. In a typical procedure, an array of sutures are anchored through the annulus and then threaded through corresponding locations around the band 40, and then the band is parachuted down the suture array to be seated at the annulus before tying off the sutures.



FIGS. 5A-5C show an exemplary inner core 70 for the annuloplasty band 40. The core 70 may comprises a variety of materials and cross-sections, and is shown rectangular in the illustrated embodiment. As indicated by the sections 4A/6A and 4B/6B taken through different locations of the band 40 and core 70, the core is desirably thicker in a mid-section than towards free ends 80a, 80b thereof. This provides some flexibility near the free ends 44a, 44b of the band 40 to help avoid dehiscence, or suture pull-out.


The annuloplasty bands of the present invention are “generally rigid” in that they will resist distortion when subjected to the stress imparted thereon by the mitral valve annulus of an operating human heart. In this sense, “distortion” means substantial permanent deformation from a predetermined or manufactured shape. A number of “generally rigid” materials can be utilized as an inner core of the bands that will perform this function, including various bio-compatible polymers, metals, alloys, and combinations or composites thereof. For example, certain polyesters that resist distortion and also rapid degradation within the body may be used (a material that degrades slowly may provide the required initial support). In a preferred embodiment, at least an inner core or body of the annuloplasty band of the present invention is made of a suitable metal, such as cobalt-chromium (Co—Cr) alloys (for example, ELGILOY® Co—Cr made by Elgiloy, L. P. of Elgin, Ill., U.S.A), also titanium or its alloys (for example, titanium-6-4, which contains about 6% aluminum and 4% vanadium by weight), stainless steel, nitinol, or combinations thereof.


The core or band body may be one piece, or may include a plurality of concentric bands held together or otherwise cooperating elements, or any combination thereof. Embodiments of one-piece cores include a square/rectangular cross section, for example, as illustrated in FIGS. 6A and 6B, or a core having another shape, for example, a convex polygon, a circle, or an oval. Other embodiments of the core include at least one channel, for example, a C-shape or an H-shape cross section. As shown in FIGS. 6A and 6B, the cross-sectional shape can vary along the length of the core. As such, some cores include at least one portion that includes a channel, for example, along the mid-section, and another portion without a channel, for example, at one or both ends.


Embodiments in which the core comprises bands include cores in which the bands are stacked radially or concentrically, and/or axially. The flexibility or rigidity of one or more selected portions of such cores can be adjusted, for example, by varying the number of bands at the portion, changing a thickness of at least one band in the portion, incorporating at least one band comprising a different material, or any combination thereof. Some embodiments include a spacer between at least one adjacent pair of bands, for example, a polymer and/or elastomer spacer. Other embodiments of multi-piece cores include braided cores, which are braided from a plurality of wires, strands, and/or braids.


The annuloplasty bands of the present invention are also especially suited to correcting particular pathologies. That is, the present invention contemplates a set of bands defined by band bodies wherein the proportional shapes of the band bodies change with increasing nominal orifice sizes of the band bodies in the set. The orifice size generally refers to the nominal length across the major axis of the band body, although some rings or bands deviate from this nomenclature. Typically, annuloplasty rings and bands have orifice sizes in even millimeter increments (e.g., 24 mm, 26 mm, etc., up to about 40 mm) as measured across the major axes. Other sizing schemes are also possible, for example, odd millimeter increments, every millimeter increments, or combination schemes, for example, every millimeter up to a certain size, then even increments above that size. Such rings will have distinct packaging so as to be labeled with the particular size. The change of band shape depends on the pathology being corrected. For instance, pathologies resulting in mitral regurgitation may benefit from a set of bands which have increasing circularity as the band size increases. It is important to understand that the set of bands is formed of band bodies that are formed during manufacture to be “generally rigid” and not easily manipulated. One example is a band core formed of bands of Elgiloy® Co—Cr alloy. It should also be mentioned that holders for such annuloplasty bands have peripheral shapes that conform to the optimally-sized bands.


Some sets of the annuloplasty band include progressively sized bands, that is, at least one dimension that does not scale linearly with the labeled size of the band. Because the labeled size is related to the major axis length, as described above, the progressivity or nonlinearity is described with respect to the major axis length, unless otherwise specified. Examples of dimensions that are progressively sized in embodiments of sets include the length of the minor axis, and the height or degree of saddle. Another variable subject to progressivity is flexibility of at least one portion of the band. Some sets include bands with combinations of progressive dimensioning, for example, minor axis length and saddle height.


In some sets, every band in the set is progressively sized along at least one dimension. In some sets, the progressive sizing is applied in steps, for example, to sub-sets or ranges of band sizes rather than on every individual band. For example, some sets include a first range of band sizes in which a dimension scales proportionally with size, and a second range of band sizes in which the same dimension also scales proportionally with size, but where the proportion is different between the first range and the second range. In some sets, a first range of sizes is not progressively sized, for example, smaller bands, and a second range is progressively sized, for example, larger bands.


As discussed above, in some sets, a ratio between the minor axis 24 and major axis 22 changes with size. In some embodiments, this aspect ratio increases with labeled size. For example, some bands described herein can be defined as a part of a D-shape, as shown in the drawings, but bands for sizes of about 36 mm and up are more rounded. Consequently, in some embodiments, at larger sizes, the band curves become more symmetric in plan view across the major axis 22 (see FIG. 2), at least on the longer side.


In another example, a set of bands has increasing saddle profiles for larger sizes, though not linearly increasing. That is, a preferred set of bands has a relatively flat saddle (smaller upward bows) for bands under about 30 mm, a constant moderate saddle shape in bands of from about 24-30 mm, while the larger bands from about 36-40 mm have more pronounced saddles.


In another set of bands, the saddle increases proportionately with size at smaller sizes, and progressively at larger sizes. A variation includes a middle range in which the saddle increases progressively, but less aggressively than for the larger sizes.


While the foregoing is a complete description of the preferred embodiments of the invention, various alternatives, modifications, and equivalents may be used. Moreover, it will be obvious that certain other modifications may be practiced within the scope of the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. An asymmetrical mitral annuloplasty band adapted for implant against a mitral valve annulus, the annulus having a posterior aspect to which a posterior leaflet attaches and an anterior aspect to which an anterior leaflet attaches, the annulus defining a D- or kidney-shape looking at an inflow side thereof with the anterior aspect being straighter than the more rounded posterior aspect and a minor axis intersecting and extending across the annulus between mid-points on the anterior and posterior aspects being shorter than a major axis perpendicular thereto intersecting and extending across the mitral valve annulus, and the annulus defining a saddle shape where the annulus rises up toward the left atrium at mid-points of both the anterior aspect and the posterior aspect, the band comprising: an inner elongated discontinuous rigid or semi-rigid core surrounded by a suture-permeable interface, the core defining an asymmetric shape of the band as viewed in top plan view when implanted that generally conforms to a portion of the shape of the mitral annulus extending around the entire posterior aspect and including an upward bow corresponding with the rise in the posterior aspect and defining a reference point at a mid-point of the upward bow, wherein the band extends clockwise along a first span from the reference point to a first free end and extends farther counterclockwise from the reference point along a second span into the anterior aspect to a second free end, the band defining a gap between the first and second free ends, wherein the band has a partial saddle shape with a first high point at the reference point, and the second span extends between 37-42% around the mitral annulus.
  • 2. The mitral annuloplasty band of claim 1, wherein the core is rectangular and is thicker in a mid-section than closer to the first and second free ends.
  • 3. The mitral annuloplasty band of claim 2, wherein the core is made of nitinol.
  • 4. The mitral annuloplasty band of claim 2, wherein the suture-permeable interface is made of an elastomeric sleeve closely surrounding the core and a fabric outer cover, and the elastomeric sleeve is molded to have an outwardly-extending flange to facilitate suturing of the band to the mitral annulus.
  • 5. The mitral annuloplasty band of claim 1, wherein a total circumferential span of the band extends between 58-67% around the mitral annulus.
  • 6. The asymmetrical mitral annuloplasty band of claim 1, wherein the second span extends about 135° around the mitral annulus.
  • 7. The asymmetrical mitral annuloplasty band of claim 1, wherein the second span extends about 150° around the mitral annulus.
  • 8. The asymmetrical mitral annuloplasty band of claim 1, wherein the first span extends about 90° around the mitral annulus.
  • 9. The asymmetrical mitral annuloplasty band of claim 1, wherein the band has a relatively flat partial saddle shape if the major axis is under 30 mm, and a more pronounced partial saddle shape if the major axis is between 36-40 mm.
  • 10. The mitral annuloplasty band of claim 1, wherein the annulus further defines an anterior commissure and a posterior commissure at the two junctions between the two leaflets with the anterior commissure located clockwise from the mid-point of the posterior leaflet and the posterior commissure located counter-clockwise from the mid-point of the posterior leaflet, and wherein the first free end is adapted to be implanted adjacent the anterior commissure.
  • 11. An asymmetrical mitral annuloplasty band adapted for implant against a mitral valve annulus, the annulus having a posterior aspect to which a posterior leaflet attaches and an anterior aspect to which an anterior leaflet attaches, the annulus defining a D- or kidney-shape looking at an inflow side thereof with the anterior aspect being straighter than the more rounded posterior aspect and a minor axis intersecting and extending across the annulus between mid-points on the anterior and posterior aspects being shorter than a major axis perpendicular thereto intersecting and extending across the mitral valve annulus, and the annulus defining a saddle shape where the annulus rises up toward the left atrium at mid-points of both the anterior aspect and the posterior aspect, the band comprising: an inner elongated discontinuous rigid or semi-rigid core surrounded by a suture-permeable interface, the core defining an asymmetric shape of the band as viewed in top plan view when implanted that generally conforms to a portion of the shape of the mitral annulus extending around the entire posterior aspect and including an upward bow corresponding with the rise in the posterior aspect and defining a reference point at a mid-point of the upward bow, wherein the band extends clockwise along a first span from the reference point to a first free end and extends farther counterclockwise along a second span to a second free end, the band defining a gap between the first and second free ends, wherein the band has a partial saddle shape with a first high point at the reference point, two low points located approximately at an intersections of the band with the major axis, and a second high point at the second free end.
  • 12. The mitral annuloplasty band of claim 11, wherein the core is rectangular and is thicker in a mid-section than closer to the first and second free ends.
  • 13. The mitral annuloplasty band of claim 12, wherein the core is made of nitinol.
  • 14. The mitral annuloplasty band of claim 12, wherein the suture-permeable interface is made of an elastomeric sleeve closely surrounding the core and a fabric outer cover, and the elastomeric sleeve is molded to have an outwardly-extending flange to facilitate suturing of the band to the mitral annulus.
  • 15. The mitral annuloplasty band of claim 11, wherein a total circumferential span of the band extends between 58-67% around the mitral annulus.
  • 16. The asymmetrical mitral annuloplasty band of claim 11, wherein the second span extends about 135° around the mitral annulus.
  • 17. The asymmetrical mitral annuloplasty band of claim 11, wherein the second span extends about 150° around the mitral annulus.
  • 18. The asymmetrical mitral annuloplasty band of claim 11, wherein the first span extends about 90° around the mitral annulus.
  • 19. The asymmetrical mitral annuloplasty band of claim 11, wherein the band has a relatively flat partial saddle shape if the major axis is under 30 mm, and a more pronounced partial saddle shape if the major axis is between 36-40 mm.
  • 20. The mitral annuloplasty band of claim 11, wherein the annulus further defines an anterior commissure and a posterior commissure at the two junctions between the two leaflets with the anterior commissure located clockwise from the mid-point of the posterior leaflet and the posterior commissure located counter-clockwise from the mid-point of the posterior leaflet, and wherein the first free end is adapted to be implanted adjacent the anterior commissure.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 16/434,961, filed Jun. 7, 2019, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,471,280, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/177,112, filed Jun. 8, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,314,707, which claims the benefit of U.S. application Ser. No. 62/173,294, filed Jun. 9, 2015, the contents all of which are incorporated by reference for all purposes.

US Referenced Citations (267)
Number Name Date Kind
1250153 Ellis Dec 1917 A
3656185 Carpentier Apr 1972 A
4042979 Angell Aug 1977 A
4055861 Carpentier Nov 1977 A
4164046 Cooley Aug 1979 A
4217665 Bex et al. Aug 1980 A
4275469 Gabbay Jun 1981 A
4290151 Massana Sep 1981 A
4602911 Ahmadi et al. Jul 1986 A
4790844 Ovil Dec 1988 A
4917097 Proudian et al. Apr 1990 A
4993428 Arms Feb 1991 A
5010892 Colvin et al. Apr 1991 A
5041130 Cosgrove et al. Aug 1991 A
5061277 Carpentier et al. Oct 1991 A
5064431 Gilbertson et al. Nov 1991 A
5104407 Lam Apr 1992 A
5201880 Wright et al. Apr 1993 A
5258021 Duran Nov 1993 A
5306296 Wright et al. Apr 1994 A
5316016 Adams et al. May 1994 A
5344442 Deac Sep 1994 A
5396887 Imran Mar 1995 A
5397348 Campbell et al. Mar 1995 A
5450860 O'Connor Sep 1995 A
5480424 Cox Jan 1996 A
5496336 Cosgrove et al. Mar 1996 A
5533515 Coller et al. Jul 1996 A
5573007 Bobo, Sr. Nov 1996 A
5593435 Carpentier et al. Jan 1997 A
5607471 Seguin et al. Mar 1997 A
5662704 Gross Sep 1997 A
5674279 Wright et al. Oct 1997 A
5728064 Burns et al. Mar 1998 A
5733331 Peredo Mar 1998 A
5752522 Murphy May 1998 A
5776189 Khalid Jul 1998 A
5814098 Hinnenkamp et al. Sep 1998 A
5824066 Gross Oct 1998 A
5824069 Lemole Oct 1998 A
5848969 Panescu et al. Dec 1998 A
5855563 Kaplan et al. Jan 1999 A
5855601 Bessler et al. Jan 1999 A
5865801 Houser Feb 1999 A
5885228 Rosenman et al. Mar 1999 A
5888240 Carpentier et al. Mar 1999 A
5902308 Murphy May 1999 A
5919147 Jain Jul 1999 A
5921934 Teo Jul 1999 A
5921935 Hickey Jul 1999 A
5924984 Rao Jul 1999 A
5931868 Gross Aug 1999 A
5972030 Garrison et al. Oct 1999 A
6001127 Schoon et al. Dec 1999 A
6010531 Donlon et al. Jan 2000 A
6019739 Rhee et al. Feb 2000 A
6024918 Hendriks et al. Feb 2000 A
6042554 Rosenman et al. Mar 2000 A
6066160 Colvin et al. May 2000 A
6081737 Shah Jun 2000 A
6083179 Oredsson Jul 2000 A
6099475 Seward et al. Aug 2000 A
6102945 Campbell Aug 2000 A
6110200 Hinnenkamp Aug 2000 A
6117091 Young et al. Sep 2000 A
6143024 Campbell Nov 2000 A
6159240 Sparer et al. Dec 2000 A
6183512 Howanec, Jr. et al. Feb 2001 B1
6187040 Wright Feb 2001 B1
6210432 Solem et al. Apr 2001 B1
6217610 Carpentier Apr 2001 B1
6231601 Myers et al. May 2001 B1
6231602 Carpentier et al. May 2001 B1
6250308 Cox Jun 2001 B1
6258122 Tweden et al. Jul 2001 B1
6312464 Navia Nov 2001 B1
6332893 Mortier et al. Dec 2001 B1
6368348 Gabbay Apr 2002 B1
6391054 Carpentier et al. May 2002 B2
6406420 McCarthy et al. Jun 2002 B1
6406493 Tu et al. Jun 2002 B1
6409759 Peredo Jun 2002 B1
6419696 Ortiz et al. Jul 2002 B1
6524338 Gundry Feb 2003 B1
6602288 Cosgrove et al. Aug 2003 B1
6602289 Colvin et al. Aug 2003 B1
6619291 Hlavka et al. Sep 2003 B2
6689164 Seguin Feb 2004 B1
6709456 Langberg et al. Mar 2004 B2
6718985 Hlavka et al. Apr 2004 B2
6719786 Ryan et al. Apr 2004 B2
6723038 Schroeder et al. Apr 2004 B1
6726715 Sutherland Apr 2004 B2
6726716 Marquez Apr 2004 B2
6726717 Alfieri et al. Apr 2004 B2
6749630 McCarthy Jun 2004 B2
6764510 Vidlund et al. Jul 2004 B2
6797002 Spence et al. Sep 2004 B2
6800090 Alferness et al. Oct 2004 B2
6802860 Cosgrove et al. Oct 2004 B2
6805710 Bolling et al. Oct 2004 B2
6805711 Quijano et al. Oct 2004 B2
6830586 Quijano et al. Dec 2004 B2
6858039 McCarthy Feb 2005 B2
6881220 Edwin et al. Apr 2005 B2
6908482 McCarthy Jun 2005 B2
6918917 Nguyen et al. Jul 2005 B1
6921407 Nguyen et al. Jul 2005 B2
6942694 Liddicoat et al. Sep 2005 B2
6945996 Sedransk Sep 2005 B2
6955689 Ryan et al. Oct 2005 B2
6966924 Holmberg Nov 2005 B2
6977950 Krishnamoorthy Dec 2005 B1
6986775 Morales et al. Jan 2006 B2
7037334 Hlavka et al. May 2006 B1
7063722 Marquez Jun 2006 B2
7066954 Ryan et al. Jun 2006 B2
7101395 Tremulis et al. Sep 2006 B2
7112219 Vidlund et al. Sep 2006 B2
7118595 Ryan et al. Oct 2006 B2
7125421 Tremulis et al. Oct 2006 B2
7166126 Spence et al. Jan 2007 B2
7166127 Spence et al. Jan 2007 B2
7247134 Vidlund et al. Jul 2007 B2
7294148 McCarthy Nov 2007 B2
7329280 Bolling et al. Feb 2008 B2
7361190 Shaoulian et al. Apr 2008 B2
7455690 Cartledge et al. Nov 2008 B2
7527647 Spence May 2009 B2
7608103 McCarthy Oct 2009 B2
7935145 Alfieri May 2011 B2
7959673 Carpentier Jun 2011 B2
7988725 Gross et al. Aug 2011 B2
7993395 Vanermen et al. Aug 2011 B2
8123802 Kron et al. Feb 2012 B2
8163012 Fawzy et al. Apr 2012 B2
8216303 Navia Jul 2012 B2
8241351 Cabiri Aug 2012 B2
8277502 Miller et al. Oct 2012 B2
8287591 Keidar Oct 2012 B2
8353956 Miller et al. Jan 2013 B2
8460173 Schweich, Jr. et al. Jun 2013 B2
8529620 Alfieri Sep 2013 B2
8535374 Redmond et al. Sep 2013 B2
8591576 Hasenkam et al. Nov 2013 B2
8734507 Keranen May 2014 B2
8764821 Carpentier et al. Jul 2014 B2
8784483 Navia Jul 2014 B2
8858623 Miller et al. Oct 2014 B2
8911494 Hammer et al. Dec 2014 B2
8915960 Carpentier Dec 2014 B2
8926696 Cabiri et al. Jan 2015 B2
8926697 Gross et al. Jan 2015 B2
8932350 Brunnett Jan 2015 B2
9192472 Gross et al. Nov 2015 B2
9295553 Padala Mar 2016 B2
9326858 Migliazza et al. May 2016 B2
9414922 McCarthy et al. Aug 2016 B2
9526613 Gross et al. Dec 2016 B2
9610162 Zipory et al. Apr 2017 B2
9662209 Gross et al. May 2017 B2
9937041 Carpentier Apr 2018 B2
10166101 Alfieri et al. Jan 2019 B2
10314707 Adams Jun 2019 B2
11471280 Adams Oct 2022 B2
20010034551 Cox Oct 2001 A1
20020129820 Ryan Sep 2002 A1
20020133180 Ryan et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020169504 Alferness et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020173844 Alfieri Nov 2002 A1
20030033009 Gabbay Feb 2003 A1
20030040793 Marquez Feb 2003 A1
20030045929 McCarthy et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030078653 Vesely et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030083742 Spence et al. May 2003 A1
20030093148 Bolling May 2003 A1
20030105519 Fasol et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030130731 Vidlund et al. Jul 2003 A1
20040006384 Mccarthy Jan 2004 A1
20040088047 Spence et al. May 2004 A1
20040122513 Navia et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040148021 Cartledge et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040153144 Seguin Aug 2004 A1
20040186566 Hindrichs et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040249452 Adams et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040249453 Cartledge et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050004665 Aklog Jan 2005 A1
20050004666 Alfieri et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050043791 McCarthy et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050060030 Lashinski et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050070999 Spence Mar 2005 A1
20050075727 Wheatley Apr 2005 A1
20050131533 Alfieri Jun 2005 A1
20050182487 McCarthy et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050192666 McCarthy Sep 2005 A1
20050197696 Gomez Duran Sep 2005 A1
20050246014 McCarthy Nov 2005 A1
20050256567 Lim et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050256568 Lim Nov 2005 A1
20050256569 Lim et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050267572 Schoon et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050278022 Lim Dec 2005 A1
20050283232 Gabbay Dec 2005 A1
20050288776 Shaoulian et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050288777 Rhee et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050288778 Shaoulian et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050288780 Rhee et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050288782 Moaddeb et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050288783 Shaoulian Dec 2005 A1
20060015178 Moaddeb et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060015179 Bulman-Fleming et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060020336 Liddicoat Jan 2006 A1
20060025856 Ryan et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060025858 Alameddine Feb 2006 A1
20060030885 Hyde Feb 2006 A1
20060129236 McCarthy Jun 2006 A1
20060149368 Spence Jul 2006 A1
20060195183 Navia et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060259135 Navia et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070016287 Cartledge et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070038294 Navia Feb 2007 A1
20070049952 Weiss Mar 2007 A1
20070050020 Spence Mar 2007 A1
20070066863 Rafiee et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070100439 Cangialosi et al. May 2007 A1
20070100441 Kron et al. May 2007 A1
20070112424 Spence et al. May 2007 A1
20070118151 Davidson May 2007 A1
20070123979 Perier et al. May 2007 A1
20070162111 Fukamachi et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070173930 Sogard et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070213582 Zollinger et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070255396 Douk et al. Nov 2007 A1
20080058924 Ingle Mar 2008 A1
20080071365 Ley Mar 2008 A1
20080086203 Roberts Apr 2008 A1
20080275551 Alfieri Nov 2008 A1
20090036979 Redmond Feb 2009 A1
20090043381 Macoviak et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090177276 Carpentier et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090177277 Milo Jul 2009 A1
20090177278 Spence Jul 2009 A1
20090192602 Kuehn Jul 2009 A1
20090192603 Kuehn Jul 2009 A1
20090192604 Gloss Jul 2009 A1
20090192605 Gloss et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090192606 Gloss et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090287303 Carpentier Nov 2009 A1
20100023117 Yoganathan et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100030014 Ferrazzi Feb 2010 A1
20100063586 Hasenkam et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100324670 Kron Dec 2010 A1
20110093065 Roberts Apr 2011 A1
20110160849 Carpentier Jun 2011 A1
20110184511 Brunnett et al. Jul 2011 A1
20120071970 Carpentier et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120136435 Brunnett et al. May 2012 A1
20120203330 Cartledge et al. Aug 2012 A1
20130150958 De Paulis Jun 2013 A1
20130204361 Adams Aug 2013 A1
20140081393 Hasenkam et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140277420 Migliazza Sep 2014 A1
20150265403 Keranen Sep 2015 A1
20160338830 Jin et al. Nov 2016 A1
20170281337 Campbell Oct 2017 A1
20200054453 Zerkowski Feb 2020 A1
20200146854 Sirhan May 2020 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (18)
Number Date Country
102089930 Jun 2011 CN
103153231 Jun 2013 CN
0338994 Oct 1989 EP
0860151 Aug 1998 EP
1034753 Sep 2000 EP
2531115 Dec 2012 EP
2008502457 Jan 2008 JP
2011520505 Jul 2011 JP
9742871 Nov 1997 WO
0023007 Apr 2000 WO
0187191 Nov 2001 WO
2005004753 Jan 2005 WO
2005034813 Apr 2005 WO
2005122964 Dec 2005 WO
2008063537 May 2008 WO
2009052397 Apr 2009 WO
2009139776 Nov 2009 WO
2015013861 Feb 2015 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (29)
Entry
Bouleti, MD. et al., “Transfemoral Tricuspid Valve-in-Ring Implantation Using the Edwards Sapien XT Valve”, (2015) Circ. Cardiovasc. Interv. 8:1-4.
Dall'Agata. et al., “Cosgrove-Edwards Mitral Ring Dynamics Measured With Transesophageal Three-Dimensional Echocardiography”, (1998) Ann. Thorac. Surg., 65:485-490.
Gillinov, MD. et al., “Cosgrove Ring Annuloplasty For Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation”, (2003) Operative Techniques in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 8, Issue 4:184-187.
Grande, MD. et al., “Iatrogenic Circumflex Coronary Lesion in Mitral Valve Surgery”, (2008) Tex. Heart Inst. J 35 (2):179-183.
Somekh, Md et al., “ Left Circumflex Coronary Artery Occlusion after Mitral Valve Annuloplasty”, (2012) Tex. Heart Inst. J 39(1):104-107.
Adams, David, et al., “Large Annuloplasty Rings Facilitate Mitral Valve Repair in Barlow's Disease,” Society of Thoracic Surgeons 42.sup.nd Annual Meeting, Jan. 30-Feb. 1, 2006.
Alonso-Lei, MD., et al., Adjustable Annuloplasty for Tricuspid Insufficiency, The annals of Thoracic Surgery, vol. 46, No. 3, pp. 368-369, Sep. 1988.
Bolling, et al., Surgical Alternatives for Heart Failure, The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, vol. 20, No. 7, pp. 729-733,2001.
Bolling, Mitral Valve Reconstruction in the Patient With Heart Failure, Heart Failure Reviews, 6, pp. 177-185, 2001.
Caleya, et al., Fracture of Carpentier's Ring in a Patient with Tricuspid Annuloplasty. Thoracic Cardiovascular Surgeon. vol. 31. pp. 175-176. 1983.
Carpentier, et al. “The ‘Physio-Ring’: An Advanced Concept in Mitral Valve Annuloplasty,” Society of Thoracic Surgeons 31.sup.st Annual meeting, Jan. 30-Feb. 2, 1995.
Carpentier, et al., Reconstructive Valve Surgery, Chapters 17-19, ISBN No. 978-0-7216-9168-8, Sanders Elsevier Publishing, Maryland Heights, Missouri, 2010.
Carpentier-Edwards Classic Annuloplasty Ring With Duraflo Treatment Models 4425 and 4525 for Mitral and Tricuspid Valvuloplsty, Baxter Healthcare Corporation, 1998.
Carpentier-Edwards Physio Annuloplasty Ring, Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, 2003.
Cochran, et al., Effect of Papillary Muscle Position on Mitral Valve Function: Relationship to Homografts, The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, pp. 5155-5161, 1998.
Cosgrove, et al., Initial Experience with the Cosgrove-Edwards Annuloplasty System. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. vol. 60. pp. 499-504. 1995.
Cosgrove-Edwards, Annuloplasty System. Edwards Lifesciences Corporation. 2000.
D.C. Miller, IMR Redux—To Repair or Replace?, Journal of Thoracic & Cardiovascular Surgery, pp. 1-8,2001.
Daimon, MD., et al., “Mitral Valve Repair With Carpentier-McCarthy-Adams IMR ETlogix Annuloplasty Ring for Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation”, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, pp. I-588-I-593, Jul. 4, 2006.
Flachskampf, Frank A., et al. “Analysis of Shape and Motion of the Mitral Annulus in Subjects With and Without Cardiomyopathy by Echocardiographic 3-Dimensional Reconstruction,” American Society of Echocardiography 0894-7317/2000.
Galinanes, et al., Fracture of the Carpentier-Edwards Ring in Tricuspid Position: A Report of Three Cases. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. vol. 42. pp. 74-76. 1986.
Gatti, et al., Preliminary Experience in Mitral Valve Repair Using the Cosgrove-Edwards Annuloplasty Ring, Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, vol. 2(3), pp. 256-261,2003.
Melo, et al., Atrioventricular Valve Repair Using Externally Adjustable Flexible Rings: The Journal of Thoracic Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 110, No. 5, 1995.
MGH Study Shows Mitral Valve Prolapse Not a Stroke Risk Factor, Massachusetts General Hospital, pp. 1-3, Jun. 1999.
Navia, Jose Luis., Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery. Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation. 2001.
Salgo, et al., Effect of Annular Shape on Leaflet Curvature in Reducing Mitral Leaflet, American Heart Association, Circulation 200; pp. 106-711.
Seguin, et al., Advance in Mitral Valve Repair Using a Device Flexible in Three Dimensions, The St. Jude Medical-Seguin Annuloplasty Ring, ASAIO Journal, vol. 42, No. 6, pp. 368-371, 1996.
Smolens, et al., Mitral Valve Repair in Heart Failure, The European Journal of Heart Failure 2, pp. 365-371,2000.
Watanbe, Nozomi, et al. “Mitral Annulus Flattens in Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation: Geometric Differences Between Inferior and Anterior Myocardial Infarction: A Real-Time 3-Dimensional Echocardiographic Study,” American Heart Association .COPVRGT.2005; ISSN: 1524-4539.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20230067849 A1 Mar 2023 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62173294 Jun 2015 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 16434961 Jun 2019 US
Child 18046709 US
Parent 15177112 Jun 2016 US
Child 16434961 US