As is known in the art, a radio frequency (RF) transmitter is a device that produces RF signals. RF transmitters may be included, for example, as part of a radio communication system that uses electromagnetic waves (radio waves) to transport information over a distance.
As is also known, a trade-off must generally be made in RF communications transmitters between energy efficiency and linearity. Over the decades of development of the RF transmitter and corresponding RF amplifiers, it has generally been true that one could obtain either high efficiency or high linearity, but not both. It would, therefore, be desirable to provide systems and techniques that allow a user to amplify RF signals and/or transmit data carrying RF signals with both high efficiency and high linearity.
U.S. Pat. No. 8,824,978, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety, describes a transmitter amplifier architecture (referred to herein as the “Asymmetric Multilevel Backoff Amplifier” or “AMBO amplifier”) that has provides high efficiency operation at wide radio-frequency (RF) bandwidth with high linearity, efficient operation under power backoff, in addition to other advantages.
An AMBO amplifier may have plurality of RF power amplifiers (PAs) whose RF outputs are power combined to supply a system RF output, and whose PA drain bias voltages may be dynamically selected using voltage control units.
In known AMBO amplifiers, one way to drive the RF inputs of the PAs is for a controller to synthesize a digital command (e.g., an I/Q signal pair) for each PA. The digital commands are converted, through the use of two or more digital-to-RF modulators, into RF input signals for the PAs. By coordinating the switching of the PA drain bias voltages and the RF input commands to the PAs, an RF output can be generated that accurately reflects a desired digital I/Q input while preserving high efficiency and linearity at high bandwidth and across a wide range of power levels. This implementation of AMBO with multiple digital-to-RF conversion paths is referred to herein as “dual-digital” AMBO.
Systems and techniques are described for amplifying and subsequently transmitting radio frequency (RF) signals with both high efficiency and high linearity.
In one embodiment, a digital-to-RF modulator provides an RF signal to an RF splitter configured to split the RF signal into a plurality of RF signals which are coupled to RF inputs of a like plurality of RF amplifiers. With this particular arrangement, digital control may be maintained over the amplitudes and the phases of RF input signals applied to one or more power amplifiers (PAs). Digital control may also be maintained over the supply voltages applied to the one or more PAs. In some embodiments, non-linear power amplifiers may be used to achieve high power efficiency within an RF transmitter. Digital control techniques may be used to achieve linearity and to further enhance efficiency. In at least one implementation, the amplitudes of one or more RF input signals of the one or more power amplifiers may be controlled to achieve backoff in the power amplifier to generate a desired output power level.
It is appreciated herein that dual-digital AMBO imposes certain limitations on system design and operation. First, requiring multiple digital-to-RF modulators (and associated digital-to-analog converters and I/Q modulators) can be expensive, representing a cost disadvantage as compared to systems utilizing only a single digital-to-RF path. Second, control and linearization considerations become much more complicated as compared to a system with a single digital-to-RF path. This includes computational costs (e.g., component cost and power dissipation) and challenges in realizing linearization (e.g., with digital predistortion), maintaining time alignment among the multiple paths, implementing signal correction such as “pulse cancellation”, etc. Moreover, these challenges become more pronounced as the number of PAs increases and/or at higher bandwidth operation, owing to the difficulty of providing all of the necessary computations and commands to the multiple digital paths and the multiple following RF paths.
According to one aspect of the disclosure, an RF amplification system comprises a digital-to-RF modulator to generate a modulated RF signal based on input information indicative of amplitude values and phase values; a plurality of RF amplifiers; an RF power divider to split the modulated RF signal into a plurality of RF input signals for the plurality of RF amplifiers; at least one voltage control unit to provide variable supply voltages to the plurality of RF amplifiers in response to at least one control signal; and a controller to receive input data and to provide the input information to the digital-to-RF modulator and the at least one control signal to the at least one voltage control unit based, at least in part, upon the received input data.
According to one aspect of the disclosure, an RF amplification system comprises a digital-to-RF modulator having a digital input port and an RF output port; a plurality of RF amplifiers, each of the RF amplifiers having an RF input port and an RF output port; an RF power divider having an RF input port coupled to the RF output port of the digital-to-RF modulator and having a like plurality of RF output ports with each of the RF output ports coupled to an RF input port of a respective one of the plurality of RF amplifiers; at least one voltage control unit to provide variable supply voltages to the first and second RF amplifiers in response to at least one control signal; and a controller to receive input data and to provide the input information to the digital-to-RF modulator and the at least one control signal to the at least one voltage control unit based, at least in part, upon the received input data.
In various embodiments, an RF amplification system further comprises an RF power combiner to combine amplified RF signals received from the plurality of RF amplifiers into a combined signal. In some embodiments, the RF power divider is configured to split the modulated RF signal into a plurality of RF signals having relative phases delays and wherein the RF power combiner is configured to match the relative phase delays such that the amplified RF signals are combined in phase.
The RF power divider may include a Wilkinson divider, a transmission-line splitter, a lumped-element splitting network, or a hybrid coupler. Similarly, the RF power combiner may include a Wilkinson combiner, a hybrid combiner, a Chireix combiner, a non-isolating combiner, transmission lines, a lumped-element reactive combiner, or a Doherty combiner.
In certain embodiments, at least one RF power divider is configured to split the modulated RF signal into a first RF signal having a first power level and a second RF signal having a second power level. The first and second power levels may be selected based upon power ratings for a first and second one of the plurality of RF amplifiers, respectively.
In some embodiments, at least one voltage control unit is configured to provide variable supply voltages selected from a plurality of discrete voltage levels. The at least one voltage control unit may be configured to generate the discrete voltage levels using a single-input, multiple-output power converter. In certain embodiments, the single-input, multiple-output power converter is provided as a switched-capacitor converter, a resonant switched-capacitor converter, or a single-inductor multiple-output converter. In some embodiments, at least one voltage control unit comprises transition shaping filters.
In several embodiments, an RF amplification system comprises a plurality of voltage control units to provide variable supply voltages to respective ones of the plurality of RF amplifiers.
The concepts, structures, and techniques sought to be protected herein may be more fully understood from the following detailed description of the drawings, in which:
The drawings are not necessarily to scale, or inclusive of all elements of a system, emphasis instead generally being placed upon illustrating the concepts, structures, and techniques sought to be protected herein.
Referring to
In some embodiments, the system 10 further includes an energy recovery module 30 coupled to RF power combiner 26.
Controller 12 includes an input to receive or otherwise obtain a stream of digital data to be amplified by the system 10 (i.e., transmit data). The transmit data may be in any suitable format (e.g., a binary bit stream; I and Q data; etc.). Controller 12 may use this transmit data, among other things, to provide input information to the digital-to-RF modulator 14 and control signals to first and second voltage control units 22, 24 that, in the example shown, will result in the transmission of the transmit data from antenna 32. Controller 12 may include any type of circuit, component, or system that is capable of performing the corresponding functions and operations described herein.
In various embodiments, the controller 12 provides digital signals (e.g., I and Q data) to the digital-to-RF modulator 14. In some implementations, the input information provided to the digital-to-RF modulator 14 may be in a format other than I and Q. For example, amplitude and phase information may be delivered to the digital-to-RF modulator 14 by controller 12.
As will become apparent form the description below, the controller can use the input information delivered to the digital-to-RF modulator 14 (e.g., an amplitude value associated with I and Q) to control/adjust a power level output by the system 10 (e.g., a transmit power level). For example, controller 12 may provide a reduced amplitude value for the digital-to-RF modulator 14 when a lower transmit power level is desired.
In various embodiments, the controller 12 adjusts control signals VCont1, VCont2 provided to the voltage control units 22, 24 and/or the input information provided digital-to-RF modulator 14 dynamically (e.g., in real-time) based on the received transmit data. For example, the controller 12 may dynamically select commands for the voltage control units 22, 24 that result in a discrete drain bias level (i.e., a supply voltage level) for each of the first and second PAs 18, 20. The controller may use level selection techniques described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,824,978.
In some embodiments, controller 12 is configured to update the information delivered to digital-to-RF modulator 14 and/or the control signals delivered to first and second voltage control units 22, 24 on a sample-by-sample basis. In at least one implementation, controller 12 is configured to provide independent control to each of first and second voltage control units 22, 24 so that different supply voltages can be simultaneously applied to first and second PAs 18, 20.
As described below, the output of the single digital-to-RF modulator 14 is split by the RF power divider 16 (e.g., an RF divider network) to drive the RF inputs of the two PAs 18, 20. To achieve high linearity, the controller 12 may utilize linearization techniques, e.g., digital predistortion with training feedback from the RF output. Linearization techniques such as supply-selection-dependent digital predistortion (DPD) and training methods, pulse cancellation (injected via corrections of the data inputs into the single digital-to-RF modulator), etc., can all be used for performance improvement, as in a dual-digital path AMBO system.
The digital-to-RF modulator 14 includes any suitable type of circuits or components operable to receive input information from the controller 12 and to generate an analog RF signal that enables an accurate representation of the transmit data to be provided at the antenna 32. In certain embodiments, the digital-to-RF modulator 14 is capable of converting digital input information representative of time-varying amplitude and phase into an analog RF output signal having corresponding amplitude and phase characteristics. The RF output of the digital-to-RF modulator 14 may be coupled directly to the RF power divider 16, as shown, or there may be one or more stages of amplitude adjustment (e.g., amplification or attenuation), impedance matching, and/or phase adjustment circuitry coupled between the modulator 14 and the power divider 16.
The system 10 may use any suitable modulation and coding scheme (MCS) to represent the transmit data within the RF transmit signal. For example, the system 10 may use binary phase shift keying (BPSK), quadrature phase shift keying (QPSK), quadrature amplitude modulation (e.g., QAM, 16 QAM, 64 QAM, 128 QAM, etc), orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM), Code Division Multiple Access and/or other ways or encoding information and may meet the needs of transmit systems suitable for single or multi-carrier LTE or GSM standards. Some of these result in transmit signals that have relatively high peak to average power ratios. As is well known, transmit signals having high peak to average power ratios typically require highly linear power amplification to provide an accurate representation of transmit data. In various embodiments described herein, transmission systems and techniques are described that are capable of providing efficient power amplification with sufficient linearity to support transmit signals having high peak to average power ratios.
The RF power divider 16 may include any type of circuits or components operative to receive modulated RF signals from the digital-to-RF modulator 14 and to divide (or “split”) the modulated RF signals into a plurality of RF signals which may be provided as inputs to a plurality of PAs. In the example shown, the power divider 16 splits a digital input signal (e.g., an I/Q signal pair) into first and second RF input signals to drive the first and second PAs 18, 20, respectively. The power divider 16 may also be referred to as an “RF splitter.”
In some embodiments, the RF power divider 16 may be realized with a Wilkinson divider, a divider based on a transmission-line splitter, a lumped-element splitting network, or a hybrid circuit such as a rat-race hybrid coupler or a branch-line hybrid coupler used as a divider.
In various embodiments, the power divider 16 is configured to provide a predetermined fixed impedance to the digital-to-RF converter 14 regardless of the loading provided by the PA inputs. Those skilled in the art will understand that this can be provided, for example, using a hybrid coupler as a divider loaded with the matching PA inputs, as in a balanced amplifier. In other embodiments, the power divider 16 does not preserve fixed input impedance as the loading impedances vary.
In some embodiments, the power divider 16 is configured to generate RF output signals that are substantially aligned in phase. However, in some applications it may be preferable to have the PA input signals not aligned in phase. Here, the relative delays (i.e., phase shifts) of the divider 16 output signals may be selected to match and/or compensate for phase shifts of the power combiner 26 such that the RF outputs of the PAs 18, 20 combine in phase in the combiner 26. As such, the net delays through the two RF paths to the output (e.g., to antenna 32) can be matched.
For example, if the phase of the power divider output coupled to the first PA 18 leads the phase of the power divider output signal coupled to the second PA 20 by 90 degrees, then the power combiner 26 may be configured such that the phase from the first input of the combiner (connected to the output of the first PA 18) to the RF output lags, by 90 degrees, the phase from the second input of the combiner (connected to the output of the second PA 20) to the RF output. Such phase-delay matching can be achieved, for example, using a 90 degree coupler (e.g., a branchline hybrid coupler) within both power divider 16 and within power combiner 26.
As another example, phase-delay matching can be achieved by matching a rat-race hybrid used as a divider 16 with a rat-race hybrid used as a combiner 26 to appropriately match phases of the two paths to the output. As yet another example, phase-delay matching can be achieved using suitable length transmission lines coupled in the signal paths between outputs of the power divider 16 and/or inputs of the power combiner 26.
In various embodiments, the RF power divider 16 is configured to split input power (i.e., power in the RF signal received from the digital-to-RF modulator 14) equally among the PAs 18, 20. This may be preferred, for example, when the PAs are identical or similarly rated (or “sized”). In other embodiments—e.g., where the PAs 18, 20 have different power ratings (or “sizes”)—the power divider 16 may be configured to deliver unequal RF power to the PAs. In such a system with asymmetrical power dividing and/or power amplification, the power combiner 26 may likewise be configured for asymmetrical power combining such that maximum combining efficiency is achieved with asymmetrical power inputs from the PAs.
It will also be noted that the RF inputs to the PAs 18, 20 can be designed to remain constant impedance, or can be designed to vary under drive or drain-bias-voltage level. These design choices can affect how power is split among the PAs under different operating conditions, and may also affect the loading on the digital-to-RF modulator 14. Such loading effects may be accounted for (e.g., by compensation circuits or techniques) to yield desired a desired result.
In some embodiments, the power divider 16 is provided on the same circuit board or substrate as the PAs 18, 20 and/or upon the same circuit board/substrate as the power combiner 26. In other embodiments, the power divider 16 is provided on a different circuit board or substrate.
In some embodiments, the RF power divider 16 may be provided as an isolating power splitter. In certain embodiments, isolating power splitter with energy recovery may be used, such as the systems described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,830,710, Sep. 9, 2014 (entitled “RF Energy Recovery System”) and U.S. Pat. No. 8,830,709 (entitled “Transmission-Line Resistance Compression Networks and Related Techniques). In some embodiments, the RF power splitter 16 may utilize a transformer splitter, a Wilkinson splitter, a rat-race hybrid used as a splitter, or another type of other combiner or hybrid coupler circuits for power splitting. Further, the RF power splitter 16 can be provided as a type of non-isolating splitter, including a Resistance Compression Network, a splitter based on transmission lines (e.g., two quarter-wave transmission lines connected at one end), a lumped-element reactive splitter, or a Doherty splitter.
In some embodiments, power divider or splitter 16 may be an isolating splitter having an isolation port. As is known, an isolating splitter will sometimes output energy at the isolation port due to, for example, mismatches, imbalances, and/or reflections in the circuitry coupled to the splitter. Typically, a resistive termination will be coupled to the isolation port of an isolating splitter to provide an impedance match for the port and to dissipate any energy output from the port. Thus, in some embodiments, an energy recovery module (not shown) may be coupled to the isolation port of an isolating splitter, rather than a conventional resistive termination, for use in recovering some or all of the energy that would otherwise have been dissipated. Recovering energy from the splitter 16 may be less important than for the power combiner 26 owing to the lower relative power level, but may nonetheless be of value in achieving high efficiency. The energy recovery module (not shown) may include circuitry for converting the recovered energy into a useful form. For example, the recovered energy may be converted to a form that can be used to charge a battery. Alternatively, the recovered energy may be converted to a form that may be used to energize other circuitry within system 10.
First and second PAs 18, 20 may be provided as any type of power amplifier capable of amplifying an RF signal (e.g., a signal output from power divider 16). In some implementations, first and second PAs 18, 20 may be non-linear amplifiers (and, in some cases, highly non-linear amplifiers) to improve the efficiency of operation of the amplification system 10. First and second PAs 18, 20 may use the same amplifier design or different amplifier designs.
In some embodiments, the PAs 18, 20 have an input coupled to a respective output of the RF power divider 16, a drain bias input coupled to a respective one of the voltage control units 22, 24, and an output coupled to a respective input of the power combiner 26.
The PAs 18, 20 may have one or more stages of RF power amplification. As with other AMBO systems (e.g., systems described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,824,978), many types of PAs may be employed, including all the major classes (A, AB, B, C, D, E, F, inverse F, J, etc.) as well amplifiers containing multiple sub-amplifiers (e.g., Doherty Amplifiers, and Balanced Amplifiers). In some embodiments, the PAs 18, 20 are provided as RF-input outphasing amplifiers, such as those described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/823,220 filed on Aug. 11, 2015 (entitled “RF-Input/RF-Output Outphasing Amplifier”).
First and second voltage control units 22, 24 may be provided as any type of circuit, component, or system operative for providing variable supply voltages to first and second PAs 18, 20, respectively, based on control signals received from controller 12. The voltage control units 22, 24 may include, for example, variable power supplies, discrete power supplies, batteries, multi-level power converters, and/or switching circuits that are capable of switching between preset voltage potentials.
In some embodiments, the voltage control units 22, 24 provide drain bias voltages to the PAs that may be may be dynamically selected to be different voltages. The voltage control units 22, 24 may each select a drain bias from two or more discrete levels, though other voltage control unit designs are possible, including those that provide a continuously adjustable output. As with other AMBO systems (such as the systems described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,824,978), the voltage control units 22, 24 may include transition-shaping filters. The discrete levels for the voltage control units may optionally be generated from a single power supply input using single-input, multi-output power converter such as a switched-capacitor converter, resonant switched-capacitor converter, single-inductor multiple-output converter, etc., or using multiple power supplies.
In some implementations, first and second voltage control units 22, 24 may be capable of providing one of a plurality of predetermined voltages to respective PAs 18, 20 in response to control signals from controller 12. Thus, a control signal VCONT1 may select a voltage value for PA 18 and a control signal VCONT2 may select a voltage value for PA 20. As with the input information applied to the digital-to-RF modulator 14, the supply voltage values applied to first and second PAs 18, 20 may change on a sample-by-sample basis in some embodiments.
Power combiner 26 may be provided from any type of device or structure operative for combining the output signals of first and second PAs 18, 20 to generate an RF transmit signal at an output thereof. The RF transmit signal may then be delivered to antenna 32 for transmission into a wireless channel. As will be appreciated, the RF transmit signal should include an accurate representation of the original transmit data (e.g., the data provided as input to controller 12).
In some embodiments, the RF power combiner 26 may be provided as an isolating power combiner. In certain embodiments, isolating power combiner with energy recovery may be used, such as the systems described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,830,710 (entitled “RF Energy Recovery System”) and U.S. Pat. No. 8,830,709 (entitled “Transmission-Line Resistance Compression Networks and Related Techniques). In some embodiments, the RF power combiner 26 may utilize a transformer combiner, a Wilkinson combiner, a rat-race hybrid used as a combiner, or another type of other combiner or hybrid coupler circuits for power combining Further, the RF power combiner 26 can be provided as a type of non-isolating combiner, including a Chireix combiner, a combiner based on transmission lines (e.g., two quarter-wave transmission lines connected at one end), a lumped-element reactive combiner, or a Doherty combiner.
In some embodiments, power combiner 26 may be an isolating combiner having an isolation port. As is known, an isolating combiner will sometimes output energy at the isolation port due to, for example, mismatches, imbalances, and/or reflections in the circuitry coupled to the combiner. Typically, a resistive termination will be coupled to the isolation port of an isolating combiner to provide an impedance match for the port and to dissipate any energy output from the port. Thus, in some embodiments, an energy recovery module 30 may be coupled to the isolation port of an isolating combiner, rather than a conventional resistive termination, for use in recovering some or all of the energy that would otherwise have been dissipated. Energy recovery module 30 may include circuitry for converting the recovered energy into a useful form. For example, the recovered energy may be converted to a form that can be used to charge a battery. Alternatively, the recovered energy may be converted to a form that may be used to energize other circuitry within system 10.
In some embodiments, power combiner 26 may be implemented upon the same circuit board or substrate as the PAs 18, 20 and/or upon the same circuit board/substrate as the power divider 16. In other embodiments, power divider 26 is provided as a separate circuit element.
Although the illustrative RF amplification system 10 of
It is appreciated that the generalized system architecture described above in conjunction with
Referring to
Referring to
As shown, the system 50 may include an N-way voltage control unit 72, operative to receive one or more control signals from a controller 52 and to generate N variable supply voltages, each of which is applied to a respective one of the N PAs 62. In some embodiments, voltage control unit 72 is a digital control signal that encodes information to select levels for the N PAs 62. In other embodiments, an N-way RF amplification system 50 may include multiple voltage control units 72, each configured to apply a variable supply voltage to one or more of the PAs 62.
As with the embodiments of
It should be appreciated that the power divider 55 can have any number of output ports so desired, including an odd number of output ports. For example, a 3-way Wilkinson divider comprising three lines and three resistive connections could be used.
Referring to
Digital-to-RF modulator 84a, which may be representative of any other digital-to-RF modulator 84, has an input coupled to receive input information (e.g., I/Q data) from a controller 82, and an RF output coupled to a respective one of a plurality of power dividers 86a, 86b, . . . 86n (generally denoted 86, with digital-to-RF modulator 84 being coupled to power divider 86a in this example). The illustrative power divider 86a has outputs coupled to respective RF inputs of M PAs 88a, 88b, . . . 88m, as shown. The outputs of PAs 88a, 88b, . . . 88m are combined with each other, and also with the outputs of all other PAs 88 to result in a system RF output signal for transmission via an antenna 32.
In this example, two levels of power combining are used. A first level corresponds to a plurality of M-way power combiners 90a . . . 90n, each of which may have inputs coupled to M respective of PAs and an output. The outputs of the first level power combiners 90a . . . 90n may be coupled as inputs to an N-way power combiner 92, which provides the second level of power combining In other embodiments, the amplification system 80 could utilize a single level of power combining, such as a single power combiner having N×M inputs, or more than two levels of power combining It should be appreciated that in some applications, it may be desirable or necessary to use only single level (or stage) or power combiners, for example by omit power combiners 90a, 90b, 90c and having a power combiner 92 having N inputs.
The illustrative system 80 also includes a voltage control unit 94 configured to receive N×M control signals from the controller 82 and to apply N×M supply voltages to respective ones of the N×M PAs 88. As illustrated in
It should be appreciated that any of the techniques, control and linearization methods, and design variants described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,824,978 in conjunction with so-called “dual digital” path AMBO systems can be applied to the concepts, systems, and structures sought to be protected herein.
All references cited herein are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Having described certain embodiments, which serve to illustrate various concepts, structures, and techniques sought to be protected herein, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that other embodiments incorporating these concepts, structures, and techniques may be used. Elements of different embodiments described hereinabove may be combined to form other embodiments not specifically set forth above and, further, elements described in the context of a single embodiment may be provided separately or in any suitable sub-combination. Accordingly, it is submitted that scope of protection sought herein should not be limited to the described embodiments but rather should be limited only by the spirit and scope of the following claims.
This application is a continuation-in-part of co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 14/666,965, filed Mar. 24, 2015, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/338,671, filed Jul. 23, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,020,453, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/663,878, filed Oct. 30, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,166,536 and U.S. application Ser. No. 13/663,887, filed Oct. 30, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,824,978, all of which applications are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entireties. This application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/185,803 filed Jun. 29, 2015, which application is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4129839 | Galani et al. | Dec 1978 | A |
4835493 | Walsh, Jr. | May 1989 | A |
5012200 | Meinzer | Apr 1991 | A |
5561395 | Melton et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5847602 | Su | Dec 1998 | A |
5892395 | Stengel et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
6043707 | Budnik | Mar 2000 | A |
6081161 | Dacus et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6133788 | Dent | Oct 2000 | A |
6140807 | Vannatta et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6255906 | Eidson et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6327462 | Loke et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6377117 | Oskowsky et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6396341 | Pehlke | May 2002 | B1 |
6411655 | Holden | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6449465 | Gailus et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6535066 | Petsko | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6566944 | Pehlke et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6646501 | Wessel | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6738432 | Pehlke | May 2004 | B2 |
6784748 | Canyon | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6788151 | Shvarts et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6791417 | Pengelly | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6799020 | Heidmann et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6975166 | Grillo et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7068984 | Mathe et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7091772 | Friedel et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7103114 | Lapierre | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7236542 | Matero | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7236753 | Zipper | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7279971 | Hellberg et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7317412 | Li et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7330070 | Vaisanen | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7343138 | Bengtson | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7362251 | Jensen et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7411449 | Klingberg et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7420415 | Lee et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7423477 | Sorrells et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7440733 | Maslennikov et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7469017 | Granström et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7474149 | Snelgrove et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7482869 | Wilson | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7505747 | Solum | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7512387 | Glueck | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7535133 | Perreault et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7555059 | Rybicki et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7583149 | Funaki et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7589605 | Perreault et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7705681 | Ilkov | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7715811 | Kenington | May 2010 | B2 |
7724839 | Chen et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7817962 | Zolfaghari | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7881401 | Kraut et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7889519 | Perreault et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7956572 | Zane et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7962111 | Solum | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8009765 | Ahmed et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8026763 | Dawson et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8072264 | Gustavsson | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8155237 | Ahmed | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8164384 | Dawson et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8174322 | Heijden et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8212541 | Perreault et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8315578 | Zhu et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8340606 | Park et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8416018 | Yamauchi et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8447245 | Staudinger et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8451053 | Perreault et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8472896 | Xu | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8493142 | Tadano | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8536940 | Bohn et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8542061 | Levesque et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8542081 | Levesque et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8548400 | Traylor et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8610499 | Royer | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8611459 | McCallister | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8659353 | Dawson et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8718188 | Balteanu et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8773201 | Yamamoto et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8824978 | Briffa et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8829993 | Briffa et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8952752 | Huettner | Feb 2015 | B1 |
8995502 | Lai et al. | Mar 2015 | B1 |
9020453 | Briffa et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9083294 | Kermalli | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9141832 | Perreault et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
20030001668 | Mruz | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030146791 | Shvarts et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040100323 | Khanifar et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040251964 | Weldon | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050030104 | Chen | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050062529 | Gan et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050110590 | Korol | May 2005 | A1 |
20050191975 | Talwalkar et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050191976 | Shakeshaft et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050248401 | Hellberg et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20070066224 | d'Hont et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070066250 | Takahashi et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070069818 | Bhatti et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070123184 | Nesimoglu et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070146090 | Carey et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070159257 | Lee et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070247222 | Sorrells et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070247253 | Carey et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070281635 | McCallister et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070290747 | Traylor et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070291718 | Chan et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080001660 | Rasmussen | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080003960 | Zolfaghari | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080003962 | Ngai | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080007333 | Lee et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080012637 | Aridas et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080019459 | Chen et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080085684 | Phillips et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080139140 | Matero et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080146171 | Hellberg et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080180171 | Brobston | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080297246 | Taylor | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20100073084 | Hur et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100120384 | Pennec | May 2010 | A1 |
20100201441 | Gustavsson | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110135035 | Bose et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110156815 | Kim et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110309679 | Fisher et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120176195 | Dawson et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120235736 | Levesque et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120252382 | Bashir et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120256686 | Royer | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120313602 | Perreault et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120326684 | Perreault et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130241625 | Perreault et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130251066 | Kim et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130307618 | Anvari | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130343106 | Perreault et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130343107 | Perreault | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140118063 | Briffa et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140118065 | Briffa et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140118072 | Briffa et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140120854 | Briffa et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140125412 | Dawson et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140132354 | Briffa et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140167513 | Chang et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140225581 | Giuliano et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140226378 | Perreault | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140335805 | Briffa et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150084701 | Perreault | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150155895 | Perreault et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150194940 | Briffa et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 381 154 | Jan 2004 | EP |
170 366 | Feb 2007 | EP |
170 366 | Feb 2007 | EP |
1 609 239 | Jul 2010 | EP |
WO 2005106613 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO 2006119362 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2007082090 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO 2007094921 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO 2007136919 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO 2007136919 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO 2009153218 | Dec 2009 | WO |
WO 2010056646 | May 2010 | WO |
WO 2011097387 | Aug 2011 | WO |
WO 2013109719 | Jul 2013 | WO |
WO 2013109743 | Jul 2013 | WO |
WO 2013109797 | Jul 2013 | WO |
WO 2013134573 | Sep 2013 | WO |
WO 2013191757 | Dec 2013 | WO |
WO 2014004241 | Jan 2014 | WO |
WO 2014028441 | Feb 2014 | WO |
WO 2014070474 | May 2014 | WO |
WO 2014070475 | May 2014 | WO |
WO 2014070998 | May 2014 | WO |
WO 2014085097 | Jun 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
European Extended Search Report dated Mar. 10, 2016 corresponding to European Application No. 13851200.9; 8 Pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated May 18, 2016; for U.S. Appl. No, 14/934,760, 31 pages. |
European Extended Search Report dated May 17, 2016; for European Pat. App. No. 13851888.6, 8 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/149,491, filed May 9, 2016, Perreault, et al. |
Response filed on Jun. 3, 2016 to Non-Final Office Action dated May 18, 2016; for U.S. Appl. No. 14/934,760; 10 pages. |
European Extended Search Report dated Jul. 4, 2016; for European Appl. No. 13858970.0; 7 pages. |
Godoy et al.: “A 2.5-GHz asymmetric multilevel outphasing power amplifier in 65-nm CMOS”; Massachusetts Institute of Technology, IEEE 2011; pp. 57-60 (4 pages). |
Notice of Allowance dated Jul 7, 2016; for U.S. Appl. No. 14/934,760; 9 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/758,033, filed Jun. 26, 2015, Perreault et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/791,685, filed Jul. 6, 2015, Perreault et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/837,616, filed Aug. 27, 2015, Briffa, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/823,220, filed Aug. 11, 2015, Barton, et al. |
Sungwon Chung, et al., “Asymmetric Multilevel Outphasing Architecture for Multi-Standard Transmitters”, 2009 IEEE Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits Symposium, pp. 237-240. |
D. Diaz, et al., “Comparison of Two Different Cell Topologies for a Multilevel Power Supply to Achieve High Efficiency Envelope Amplifier”, IEEE , 2009, pp. 25-30. |
M. Rodriguez, et al., “Multilevel Converter for Envelope Tracking in RF Power Amplifiers”, IEEE, 2009, pp. 503-510. |
Yuan-Jyue Chen, et al., “Multilevel LINC System Design for Wireless Transmitters”, IEEE, 2007, pp. 1-4. |
Jinsung Choi, et al., “A ΔΕ—Digitized Polar RF Transmitter”, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 55, No. 12, Dec. 2007, pp. 2679-2690. |
Kai-Yuan Jheng, et. al., “Multilevel LINC System Design for Power Efficiency Enhancement”, IEEE, 2007, pp. 31-34. |
Kevin Tom, et al., “Load-Pull Analysis of Outphasing Class-E Power Amplifier”, The 2nd International Conference on Wireless Broadband and Ultra Wideband Communications (AusWireless 2007), IEEE, 2007, pp. 1-4. |
Surya Musunuri, et al., “Improvement of Light-Load Efficiency Using Width-Switching Scheme for CMOS Transistors”, IEEE Power Electronics Letters, vol. 3, No. 3, Sep. 2005, pp. 105-110. |
Frederick H. Raab, et al., “RF and Microwave Power Amplifier and Transmitter Technologies—Part 3”, Sep. 2003, High Frequency Electronics, Summit Technical Media, LLC., pp. 34-48. |
Petri Eloranta, et al., “A Multimode Transmitter in 0.13 μ m CMOS Using Direct-Digital RF Modulator”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 42, No. 12, Dec. 2007, pp. 2774-2784. |
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees in PCT/US2009/063821 dated Feb. 9, 2010. |
PCT Search Report of the ISA dated Apr. 13, 2010. |
PCT Written Opinion of the ISA dated Apr. 13, 2010. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability of the ISA for PCT/US2009/063821 dated May 26, 2011. |
Amendment to Office Action mailed Apr. 7, 2011 (U.S. Appl. No. 12/680,048, filed Mar. 25, 2010). |
Response to Rule 161 communication dated Jun. 28, 2011; Jan. 9, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/615,696, filed Nov. 10, 2009; 427 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/106,195, filed May 12, 2011; Part 1 of 2, 291 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/106,195, filed May 12, 2011; Part 2 of 2, 238 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/423,909, filed Mar. 19, 2012; Part 1 of 3, 300 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/423,909, filed Mar. 19, 2012; Part 2 of 3, 360 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/423,909, filed Mar. 19, 2012; Part 3 of 3, 397 pages. |
Beltran, et al.; “HF Outphasing Transmitter Using Class-E Power Amplifiers;” Microwave Symposium Digest, IEEE; Jun. 2009; pp. 757-760. |
Bifrane, et al.; “On the Linearity and Efficiency of Outphasing Microwave Amplifiers;” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques; vol. 52; No. 7; Jul. 2004; pp. 1702-1708. |
Chen, et al.; “A High Efficiency Outphasing Transmitter Structure for Wireless Communications;” Digital Signal Processing Workshop, IEEE; Jan. 2009, pp. 348-352. |
Chireix; “High Power Outphasing Modulation;” Proceedings of the Institute of Radio Engineers; vol. 23; No. 11; Nov. 1935; pp. 1370-1392. |
Cox; “Linear Amplification with Nonlinear Components;” IEEE Transactions on Communications; Dec. 1974; pp. 1942-1945. |
El-Hamamsy; “Design of High-Efficiency RF Class-D Power Amplifier;” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics; vol. 9; No. 3; May 1994; pp. 297-308. |
Eun, et al.; “A High Linearity Chireix Outphasing Power Amplifier Using Composite Right/Left-Handed Transmission Lines;” Proceedings of the 37th European Microwave Conference; Oct. 2007; pp. 1622-1625. |
Everitt, et al.; “Communication Enqineering;” 3rd Edition, Chapter 11, pp. 403-450, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1956. |
Gerhard, et al.; “Improved Design of Outphasing Power Amplifier Combiners;” 2009 German Microwave Conference; Mar. 2009; pp. 1-4. |
Godoy, et al.; “Outphasing Energy Recovery Amplifier With Resistance Compression for Improved Efficiency;” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques; vol. 57; No. 12; Dec. 2009; pp. 2895-2906. |
Hakala, et al., “A 2.14-GHz Chireix Outphasing Transmitter;” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques; vol. 53; No. 6; Jun. 2005; pp. 2129-2138. |
Hakala, et al.; Chireix Power Combining with Saturated Class-B Power Amplifiers; 12th GAAS Symposium; Oct. 2004, pp. 379-382. |
Hamill; “Impedance Plan Analysis of Class DE Amplifier;” Electronics Letters; vol. 30; No. 23; Nov. 10, 1994; pp. 1905-1906. |
Hamill; “Time Reversal Duality Between Linear Networks;” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems—I: Fundamental Theory and Applications; vol. 43; No. 1; Jan. 1996; pp. 63-65. |
Hamill; “Time Reversal Duality in Dc-Dc Converters;” Power Electronics Specialists Conference, IEEE; vol. 1; Jun. 1997; 7 pages. |
Han, et al.; “Analysis and Design of High Efficiency Matching Networks;” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics; vol. 21; No. 5, Sep. 2006; pp. 1484-1491. |
Han, et al.; “Resistance Compression Networks for Radio-Frequency Power Conversion;” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics; vol. 22; No. 1; Jan. 2007; pp. 41-53. |
Honjo; “A Simple Circuit Synthesis Method for Microwave Class-F Ultra-High-Efficiency Amplifiers with Reactance-Compensation Circuits;” Solid-State Electronics 44; Feb. 2000; pp. 1477-1482. |
Hur, et al.; “A Multi-Level and Multi-Band Class-D CMOS Power Amplifier for the LINC System in the Cognitive Radio Application;” IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters; vol. 20; Issue 6; Jun. 2010; pp. 1-3. |
Hur, et al.; “Highly Efficient and Linear Level Shifting Digital LINC Transmitter with a Phase Offset Cancellation;” Radio & Wireless Symposium; Jan. 2009; pp. 211-214. |
Hur, et al.; “Highly Efficient Uneven Multi-Level LINC Transmitter;” Electronics Letters; Jul. 30, 2009; vol. 45; No. 16; 2 pages. |
Kee, et al.; “The Class-E/F Family of ZVS Switching Amplifiers;” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques; vol. 51; No. 6; Jun. 2003; pp. 1677-1690. |
Kruass, et al.; Solid State Radio Engineering; Chapter 14, New York: Wiley, 1980. |
Langridge, et al.; “A Power Re-Use Technique for Improved Efficiency of Outphasing Microwave Power Amplifiers;” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques; vol. 47; No. 8; Aug. 1999; pp. 1467-1470. |
Lee; “Planar Microwave Enqineering;” Chapter 20, pp. 630-687, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004. |
Lepine, et al.; “L-Band LDMOS Power Amplifiers Based on an Inverse Class-F Architecture;” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques; vol. 53; No. 6; Jun. 2005; pp. 2007-2012. |
Ni, et al.; “A New Impedance Match Method in Serial Chireix Combiner;” 2008 Asia-Pacific Microwave Conference; Dec. 2008; pp. 1-4. |
Perreault; A New Power Combining and Outphasing Modulation System for High-Efficiency Power Amplification; Circuits and Systems (MWSCAS), 53rd IEEE, International Midwest Symposium; Aug. 2010; pp. 1-14. |
Phinney, et al.; “Radio-Frequency Inverters with Transmission-Line Input Networks;” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics; vol. 22; No. 4; Jul. 2007; pp. 1154-1161. |
Qureshi, et al.; “A 90-W Peak Power GaN Outphasing Amplifier with Optimum Input Signal Conditioning;” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques; vol. 57; No. 8; Aug. 2009; pp. 1925-1935. |
Raab; “Class-F Power Amplifiers with Maximally Flat Waveforms;” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques; vol. 45; No. 11; Nov. 1997; pp. 2007-2012. |
Raab; “Efficiency of Outphasing RF Power-Amplifier Systems;” IEEE Transactions on Communications; vol. Com-33; No. 10; Oct. 1985; pp. 1094-1099. |
Raab, et al.; “RF and Microwave Power Amplifier and Transmitter Technologies—Part 3;” High Frequency Electronics; Sep. 2003; pp. 34-48. |
Rivas, et al.; “A High-Frequency Resonant Inverter Topology with Low-Voltage Stress;” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics; vol. 23; No. 4; Jul. 2008; pp. 1759-1771. |
Sokal, et al.; “Class E-A New Class of High-Efficiency Tuned Single-Ended Switching Power Amplifiers;” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits; vol. SC-10; No. 3; Jun. 1975; pp. 168-176. |
Sokal; “Class-E RF Power Amplifiers;” QEX; Jan./Feb. 2001; pp. 9-20. |
Yao, et al.; “Power Amplifier Selection for LINC Applications;” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems-II: Express Briefs; vol. 53; No. 8; Aug. 2006; pp. 763-767. |
Zhang, et al.; “Analysis of Power Recycling Techniques for RF and Microwave Outphasing Power Amplifiers;” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems—II: Analog and Digital Signal Processing; vol. 49; No. 5; May 2002; pp. 312-320. |
Zhou, et al.; “A Distributed Active Transformer Coupled Outphasing Power Combiner;” IEEE Microwave Conference; Dec. 2009; pp. 2565-2568. |
Zhukov, et al.; “Push-pull switching oscillator without commutating losses;” Poluprovodnikovye Pribory v. Tekhnike Elektrosvyazi, No. 15, Jan. 1975, 8 pages. |
Xu, et al.; “A 28.1dBm class-D outphasing power amplifier in 45nm LP digital CMOS;” Symposium on VLSI Circuits Digest of Technical Papers; Jun. 16, 2009; pp. 206-207. |
Zhou, et al.; “A Distributed Active Transformer Coupled Outphasing Power Combiner;” Microwave Conference, IEEE; Dec. 7, 2009; pp. 2565-2568. |
PCT Search Report of the ISA for PCT/US2011/023613 dated May 30, 2011. |
PCT Written Opinion of the ISA for PCT/US2011/023613 dated May 30, 2011. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability of the ISA for PCT/US2011/023613 dated Aug. 16, 2012. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/020,568 filed on Feb. 3, 2011; part 1 of 2, 335 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/020,568 filed on Feb. 3, 2011; part 2 of 3, 100 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/020,568 filed on Feb. 3, 2011; part 3 of 3, 244 pages. |
Cripps; “RF Power Amplifier for Wireless Communications, 2nd Ed.;” Chapter 14, Artech House, Boston, MA; Jan. 2006. |
Godoy, et al.; “A 2.4-GHz, 27-dBm Asymmetric Multilevel Outphasing Power Amplifier in 65-nm CMOS;” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits; vol. 47; No. 10; Oct. 2012; pp. 2372-2384. |
Raab; “Average Efficiency of Class-G Power Amplifiers;” IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics; vol. CE-32; No. 2; May 1986; pp. 145-150. |
Shirvani, et al.; “A CMOS RF Power Amplifier With Parallel Amplification for Efficient Power Control;” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits; vol. 37; No. 6; Jun. 2002; pp. 684-693. |
Vasic, et al.; “Multilevel Power Supply for High Efficiency RF Amplifiers;” 2009 IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference; pp. 1233-1238; Feb. 2009. |
Walling, et al.; “A Class-G Supply Modulator and Class-E PA in 130 nm CMOS;” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits; vol. 44; No. 9; Sep. 2009; pp. 2339-2347. |
Yan, et al.; “A High Efficiency 780 MHz GaN Envelope Tracking Power Amplifier;” 2012 Compound Semiconductor Integrated Circuits Syumposium; Oct. 2012; pp. 1-4. |
Yousefzadeh, et al.; “Three-Level Buck Converter for Envelope Tracking Applications;” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics; vol. 21; No. 2; Mar. 2006; pp. 549-552. |
Heijden, et al.; “A 19W High-Efficiency Wide-Band CMOS-GaN Class-E Chireix RF Outphasing Power Amplifier” Microwave Symposium Digest (MMT), 2011 IEEE MTT-S International; Jun. 5-10, 2011; 4 pages. |
PCT Search Report of the ISA for PCT/US2013/065552 dated Mar. 20, 2014. |
Written Opinion of the ISA for PCT/US2013/065552 dated Mar. 20, 2014. |
PCT Search Report of the ISA for PCT/US2013/065553 dated Mar. 20, 2014. |
Written Opinion of the ISA for PCT/US2013/065553 dated Mar. 20, 2014. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/663,887 filed on Oct. 30, 2012. |
PCT Search Report of the ISA for PCT/US2013/70027 dated Apr. 22, 2014. |
PCT Written Opinion of the ISA for PCT/US2013/70027 dated Apr. 22, 2014. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/663,878; 200 Pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/663,878; 134 Pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/663,887; 259 Pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/338,671; 269 Pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/666,965; 175 Pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/666,965; 161 Pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/833,050; 150 Pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/833,050; 124 Pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/064,572; 150 Pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/064,572; 142 Pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/955,952; 205 Pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/955,952; 204 Pages. |
Office Action dated May 23, 2014 from U.S. Appl. No. 13/663,878, filed Oct. 30, 2012; 20 Pages. |
Response to Office Action dated May 23, 2014 as filed on Jul. 31, 2014 from U.S. Appl. No. 13/663,878, filed Oct. 30, 2012; 7 Pages. |
Office Action dated Oct. 29, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/633,878, filed Oct. 30, 2012; 15 Pages. |
Response filed Dec. 30, 2014 of Office Action dated Oct. 29, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/663,878, filed Oct. 30, 2012; 20 Pages. |
Office Action dated Jan. 26, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/955,952, filed Jul. 31, 2013; 30 Pages. |
Office Action dated Feb. 23, 2015; for U.S. Appl. No. 14/064,572, filed Oct. 28, 2013; 29 Pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 14, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/833,050, filed Mar. 15, 2013; 23 Pages. |
Response filed Mar. 10, 2015 of Office Action dated Feb. 23, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/064,572, filed Oct. 28, 2013; 3 Pages. |
Office Action dated Apr. 24, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/064,572; 10 Pages. |
Office Action dated May 7, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/663,878, filed Oct. 30, 2012; 23 Pages. |
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated May 14, 2015 for Intl. Application No. PCT/US2013/06552; 13 Pages. |
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated May 14, 2015 for Intl. Application No. PCT/US2013/06553; 13 Pages. |
Response to Office Action dated Feb. 23, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/064,572; Response filed on Mar. 10, 2015; 3 Pages. |
Response to Office Action dated Jan. 26, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/955,952; Response filed on May 26, 2015; 11 Pages. |
Office Action dated Jun. 2, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/663,878; 18 Pages. |
Office Action dated Jul. 8, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/955,952; 13 Pages. |
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jun. 2, 2015 for Intl. Application No. PCT/US2013/070027; 12 Pages. |
Response to Office Action dated Apr. 24, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/064,572; Response filed on Jul. 17, 2015; 9 Pages. |
Response to Final Office Action dated Jun. 2, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/663,878; Response filed on Jul. 21, 2015; 13 Pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 3, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/064,572; 13 Pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 29, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/955,952; 11 Pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 13, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13,663,878; 13 Pages. |
Office Action dated May 21, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/666,965; 15 Pages. |
Response to Office Action dated May 21, 2015 corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 14/666,965; Response filed on Jul. 23, 2015; 12 Pages. |
Supplemental Response to Office Action dated May 21, 2015 corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 14/666,965; Supplemental Response filed on Aug. 10, 2015; 9 Pages. |
Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 25, 2015 corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 14/666,965; 16 Pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/934,760, filed Nov. 6, 2015, Briffa, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/968,045, filed Dec. 14, 2015, Perreault et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/974,563, filed Dec. 18, 2015, Perreault et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/975,742, filed Dec. 19, 2015, Perreault et al. |
Non-Final Rejection dated Aug. 26, 2016; for U.S. Appl. No. 14/968,045; 30 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160164466 A1 | Jun 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62185803 | Jun 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14338671 | Jul 2014 | US |
Child | 14666965 | US | |
Parent | 13663878 | Oct 2012 | US |
Child | 14338671 | US | |
Parent | 13663887 | Oct 2012 | US |
Child | 13663878 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14666965 | Mar 2015 | US |
Child | 14920031 | US |