Patent Grant
10226277
The devices and methods described herein generally relate to treatment of occluded body lumens, such as the removal of occlusive material from a blood vessel or other body parts.
Peripheral and interventional cardiology is a medical specialty that deals with treatment of various forms of cardiovascular disease, including coronary artery disease and peripheral vascular disease. Coronary artery disease and peripheral vascular disease can arise due to the narrowing of the arteries by atherosclerosis (also called arteriosclerosis). Coronary artery disease generally affects arteries of the heart—arteries that carry blood to cardiac muscles and surrounding tissue. Peripheral vascular disease refers to various diseases of the vascular system outside the heart and brain, which carries blood, for example, to the legs.
Atherosclerosis commonly affects the medium and large arteries, and may occur when fat, cholesterol, and other substances build up on the walls of arteries and form fleshy or hard/calcified structures called plaques/lesions.
Pieces of plaque can break off and move through the affected artery to smaller blood vessels, which may in some instances block them and may result in tissue damage or tissue death (embolization). In some cases, the atherosclerotic plaque may be associated with a weakening of the wall of the affected artery, which can lead to an aneurysm. Minimally invasive surgeries may be performed to remove plaque from arteries in an effort to alleviate or help prevent the complications of atherosclerosis.
A number of interventional surgical methodologies may be used to treat atherosclerosis. In balloon angioplasty, for example, a physician may advance a collapsed, intravascular balloon catheter into a narrowed artery, and may inflate the balloon to macerate and/or displace plaque against the vessel wall. A successful angioplasty may help reopen the artery and allow for improved blood flow. Often, balloon angioplasty is performed in conjunction with the placement of a stent or scaffold structure within the artery to help minimize re-narrowing of the artery. Balloon angioplasty, however, can stretch the artery and induce scar tissue formation, while the placement of a stent can cut arterial tissue and also induce scar tissue formation. Scar tissue formation may lead to restenosis of the artery. In some instances, balloon angioplasty can also rip the vessel wall.
Atherectomy is another treatment methodology for atherosclerosis, and involves the use of an intravascular device to mechanically remove (e.g., debulk) plaque from the wall of the artery. Atherectomy devices may allow for the removal of plaque from the wall of an artery, reducing the risk of stretching, cutting, or dissecting the arterial wall and causing tissue damage that leads to restenosis. In some instances, atherectomy may be used to treat restenosis by removing scar tissue
Current atherectomy treatments suffer from structural and performance limitations. For example, currently-available atherectomy devices with rotating burrs (e.g., the Diamondback 360® PAD System, from Cardiovascular Systems, Inc.) generally are not configured to capture particles that are released as the burr grinds/sands tissue, which may result in diminished downstream blood flow resulting from particle residue. Additionally, these rotating burrs may cause hemolysis, and are generally limited as an adjunct therapy to angioplasty.
Other systems, such as the JETSTREAM G3® System, from Pathway Medical Technologies, include expandable cutters with foldable/movable cutting wings and vacuum-driven aspiration supplied via a vacuum pump, which may cause the artery to collapse on to the cutter and perforate the arterial wall. Other atherectomy systems may include a side-window eccentric cutter and distal nosecone which receives material from the cutter. Because the nosecone can only hold a limited volume of plaque, a surgeon may need to repeatedly withdraw the cutter and flush plaque and other material from the nosecone.
It is be desirable to provide improved atherectomy devices and methods.
Described here are devices and methods for removing occlusive material from one or more vessels. Generally, the devices may comprise a handle, a cutter assembly, and at least one catheter connecting the handle and the cutter assembly. In some variations, the cutter assembly may comprise a cutter housing having an opening and a cutter. In some variations, the cutter may comprise at least one helical flute each forming a cutting blade. In some of these variations, the one or more of the cutting blades may have a positive rake angle. In some of these variations, the positive rake angle may be at least 20 degrees. In some of these variations, the rake angle may be at least about 40 degrees. In some of these variations, the positive rake angle may be between 60 degrees and 80 degrees. In some variations, at one or more of the cutting blades may have a negative angle. In some of these variations, a cutter assembly may comprise a plurality of cutting flutes, wherein at least one of the cutting flutes forms a cutting blade having a positive rake angle, and wherein at least one of the cutting flutes forms a cutting blade having a negative rake angle. In some variations one or more of the cutting blades may have a relief angle less than or equal to 10 degrees. In some of these variations, one or more of the cutting blades may have a relief angle of about 0 degrees. In some variations, one or more of the cutting blades has a flute angle less than or equal to about 30 degrees.
In some variations, the cutter may comprise a first cutting element and a second cutting element. In some of these variations, at least a portion of the first cutting element may extend from an opening in the cutter housing. In some of these variations, at least a portion of the cutting element may have an outer diameter greater than or equal to an outer diameter of the cutter housing.
In some variations, the at least one catheter may comprise one or more regions of cut patterns. In some variations, at least one of the regions may comprise a helical cut pattern. In some variations, at least one of the regions may comprise a brickwork cut pattern. The devices may further comprise a torque shaft configured to rotate the cutter relative to the at least one catheter. In some variations, the device may further comprise an internal conveyor member.
In some variations, the at least one catheter may be configured to be deflected. In some of these variations, a device may comprise a handle, a first catheter having a proximal portion and a distal portion, a second catheter having a proximal portion and a distal portion, the second catheter moveable between an undeflected configuration and a deflected configuration in which the distal portion of the second catheter comprises a first curve and a second curve, and a cutter assembly attached to the first catheter, wherein the distal portion of the second catheter is stiffer than the distal portion of the first catheter, and wherein the proximal portion of the first catheter is stiffer than the distal portion of the second catheter, and wherein the first catheter is moveable relative to the second catheter to change the second catheter between the undeflected and deflected configurations. The devices described here may be used to remove occlusive materials from one or more vessels. In some variations, the device may be advanced intravascularly to a target zone, and the cutter assembly may be activated to cut occlusive material. In some variations, the occlusive material may comprise a chronic total occlusion. In other variations, the occlusive may be removed from the interior of a stent.
One of the clinical challenges of atherectomy arises from the native anatomy of certain peripheral regions where atherectomy is indicated (for example, in the leg). Accordingly, it may be useful to describe the anatomy of the leg.
The abdominal aorta (202) is the largest artery in the body, and its diameter can range from 19 to 25 mm (about 0.75 to about 1 inch). The abdominal aorta successively branches or divides numerous times between the proximal and distal regions of the legs. Each successive branch or division may reduce the diameter of the arteries in the direction of arterial blood flow from the heart to the feet, and the tortuousity of the path generally increases.
The first branching is at the groin, into the left (204) and right (206) common iliac arteries. In the left leg, the left common iliac artery (204) branches into the internal (208) and external (209) iliac arteries. Near the head of the femur bone (224), the external iliac artery (209) becomes the common femoral artery (210) or “CFA”. The CFA further connects to the superficial femoral artery (212) or “SFA”. The SFA connects to the popliteal artery (214), which runs behind the flexible region of the knee. Above the knee, the SFA generally has a diameter of about 5 to 7 mm, or about 0.2 to 0.25 inch. Traversing distally below the knee (toward the feet), the popliteal artery (214) may further reduce in diameter to about 4 to 4.5 mm (0.157 inch to 0.177 inch), and then further to about 3.5 mm (0.137 inch). Traversing further distally, the popliteal artery (214) eventually branches again into the anterior tibial artery (220) and the tibioperoneal trunk (216), resulting in a further reduction in diameter to about 3.0 mm to 2.5 mm (0.118 inch to 0.098 inch). Traversing further distally, the tibioperoneal trunk further subdivides into the posterior tibial (218) and peroneal (222) arteries, further reducing diameter to about 2.0 mm (0.078 inch). Overall, the diameters of the peripheral arteries of the leg vary typically from about 2 mm (below the knee) to about 7 mm (above the knee).
Atherectomy devices are usually introduced into the vasculature though an iliac artery by either an ipsilateral (i.e., same side) or a contralateral (i.e., opposite side) approach, and typically advanced under fluoroscopic radiographic image guidance through the CFA and into the SFA. Currently, nearly all intravascular atherectomy cases are performed in the SFA, however, in a majority of these cases, potentially treatable atherosclerosis exists on multiple levels of the peripheral arteries, both above and below the knee. Accordingly, the devices and methods described here may be helpful in reaching these potential atherectomy sites.
Atherectomy Systems and Apparatuses
A. Overview
The atherectomy apparatus (302) generally includes an elongated catheter body (306) having a central axis. The catheter body (306) may be sized and configured to be advanced over the guide wire (304) in a blood vessel from an external percutaneous access site. The access approach can be ipsilateral or contralateral, and down to the targeted region. For example,
The atherectomy apparatus (302) may also include a handle (308) is coupled to the proximal (i.e., closest to the caregiver) end of the catheter body (306). The handle may be sized and configured to be securely held and manipulated by a caregiver outside an intravascular path. The handle may be manipulated from outside the intravascular path near the percutaneous access site, which may allow a caregiver to advance the catheter body through the intravascular path, which, in the leg, generally becomes more tortuous as one proceeds toward the distal regions of the legs (below the knee and toward the feet). Image guidance (e.g., CT, radiographic, in situ visualization carried on board the atherectomy apparatus or otherwise provided, or another suitable guidance modality, or combinations thereof) may be used to aid in advancement or positioning of the atherectomy apparatus (302). The catheter body (306) may be advanced to provide access to a targeted region where fat, cholesterol, and other substances have accumulated on the walls of arteries to form plaques or lesions, which will also in general be referred to as “occlusive materials.”
The atherectomy apparatus (302) may further comprise a cutter assembly (310) at the distal end (e.g. farthest from the handle) end of the catheter body. Generally, the cutter assembly may act to cut and capture the occlusive material, and thereby remove occlusive material from the artery, which may open the artery to blood flow. In some variations, the cutter assembly (310) may include a rotatable cutter (312) at least partially housed within a concentric cutter housing (314). The cutter (312) may be rotatable within the housing around the central axis of the catheter body. In the variation shown in
The atherectomy apparatus (500) may include a motor (516), which in the embodiment shown in
As shown in
Additionally, the atherectomy apparatus (500) may further include an internal conveyor (524) on the torque shaft (522). As occlusive material is conveyed into the cutter housing (510) by the cutter, the conveyor (524) may convey the cut occlusive material further back (proximally) along the catheter body for discharge outside the patient's body. As mentioned above, this conveyance may occur without the use of vacuum aspiration assistance. Mechanical conveyance may complement distal capture. Because it does not require the assistance of vacuum aspiration, mechanical conveyance may minimize the risk of the artery collapsing around the cutter and the associated risk of perforation. Additionally, this conveyance may maximize the removal of tissue and blood components that have been damaged by contact with the cutter assembly.
B. The Catheter Body
1. Dimensions
For practical purposes, the outer diameter of any section of the catheter body, including the cutter assembly it carries, may be dictated at least partially by the anatomy of the intravascular path and the intended target region. Specifically, it may be desirable to maximize the cutting effectiveness of the cutter assembly by maximizing the diameter of the cutter, while minimizing the potential of puncture or trauma to the vessel. Additionally, the outer diameter of the catheter body/cutter assembly may also be dictated at least partially by the diameter of a guide sheath or introducer selected that may be placed at an access site to allow introduction of the atherectomy apparatus into the vasculature. It may be desirable to select a guide sheath or introducer sized to minimize pain, trauma, and blood loss during use, and to facilitate rapid closure of the access incision after removal, to thereby reduce the incidence of interventional complications.
As mentioned previously, diameters of the peripheral arteries of the leg vary typically from relatively small in regions below the knee (2.0 mm) to relatively large in regions above the knee (7.0 mm). For percutaneous access to the peripheral arteries, clinicians typically use guide sheaths sized from 5 F (diagnostic) to 7 F (interventional).
Assuming, for example, that a 7 French guide sheath would likely be, from a clinical perspective, the largest selected to access the larger vessels above the knee (4 mm to 7 mm), and allowing for a reasonable clearance tolerance between the catheter body/cutter assembly and the guide sheath, in some instances the outer diameter of the catheter body for introduction through such a guide sheath may be selected to be approximately equal to or less than about 2.4 mm. Assuming that a 5 F guide sheath would likely be, from a clinical perspective, the largest used to access the smaller vessels below the knee (2.5 mm to 3 mm), and allowing for a reasonable clearance tolerance between the catheter body/cutter assembly and the guide sheath, in some instances the outer diameter of the catheter body for introduction through such a guide sheath may be selected to be approximately equal to or less than about 1.8 mm. Assuming that an intermediate 6 French guide sheath would likely be, from a clinical perspective, the largest used to access the intermediate vessels near the knee (3 mm to 4 mm), and allowing for a reasonable clearance tolerance between the catheter body/cutter assembly and the guide sheath, in some instances the outer diameter of the catheter body for introduction through such a guide sheath may be selected to be approximately equal to or less than about 2.2 mm.
It may desirable that the outer diameter of the cutter assembly be maximized, to maximize the overall cutting area of the atherectomy assembly. When the cutter assembly of an atherectomy apparatus is the distal-most component of the apparatus, the cutter assembly may lead the way by cutting through the occlusive materials. With regard to the catheter body, however, there may functional and clinical benefits that arise when the outer diameter of the catheter body is not maximized to match the outer diameter of the cutter assembly. Reducing the diameter of the catheter body relative to the cutter assembly may minimize frictional contact between the catheter body and the vessel wall. This may lessen the force required to advance the catheter body through the vasculature and occlusive material, and may help prevent the catheter body from dragging against or sticking to tissue structures in the vessel, or otherwise impeding the progress of the cutter assembly through the occlusive materials.
For example, it may be desirable that the outer diameter of the catheter body proximal of the cutter assembly be sized smaller than the outer diameter of the cutter assembly. In other instances, it may be desirable that the outer diameter of the catheter body proximal of the cutter assembly be sized equal to or smaller than the outer diameter of the cutter assembly. For example, in the variation of atherectomy apparatus (500) described above with respect to
The reduced diameter of the catheter body may also permit the injection of radiographic contrast material around the catheter body in the guide sheath. For example, an atherectomy apparatus for introduction through a 7 F introducer system may have a 2.4 mm diameter cutter assembly and a catheter body having a 2.2 mm diameter. In other variations, an atherectomy apparatus for introduction through a 5 F or 6 F introducer system may have a 1.8 mm diameter cutter assembly and a catheter body having a 1.6 mm diameter, or a 2.2 mm diameter cutter assembly and a catheter body having a 1.6 mm diameter.
2. Catheter Properties
In addition to the anatomical and clinical considerations that may be used in selecting an outer diameter of a catheter body, the catheter body may also desirably possess certain physical and mechanical properties, such as those described immediately below, which may enhance the function of the catheter body to support and guide passage of the cutter assembly through the intravascular path and the occlusive materials.
(i) Column Stiffness (Pushability)
One potentially desirable property for the catheter body includes column stiffness. Expressed in units of inch/foot-pounds, column stiffness is the capability of the catheter body to withstand an axial load or compression while resisting bending. Column stiffness can be measured and characterized in conventional ways, and may be referred to as “pushability” herein. Generally, a higher column stiffness is desirable, and may allow the catheter body to transmit a higher axial force (compression) applied at the handle to the cutter assembly without buckling. Accordingly, it may be desirable that the catheter body possess column stiffness sufficient to push the cutter assembly over the guide wire without buckling. A column stiffness of 0.050 inches/lbf or greater may be desirable for the catheter bodies described here.
(ii) Tensile Stiffness (Pullability)
Another potentially desirable property for the catheter body comprises tensile stiffness. Expressed in units of inch/foot-pounds, tensile stiffness is the capability of the catheter body of withstanding tension while being stretched or pulled before the cross section starts to significantly contract (called “necking”). Tensile stiffness can be measured and characterized in conventional ways, and may be referred to as “pullability” herein. Generally, a high tensile stiffness may be desirable, and may allow the catheter body to be pulled proximally along an intravascular path (e.g., to withdraw the cutter assembly) without necking. A tensile stiffness of 0.050 inches/lbf or greater may be desirable for the catheter bodies described here.
(iii) Torsional Stiffness (Torquability)
Another potentially desirable property for the catheter body comprises torsional stiffness. Expressed in degrees/ounce-inch, torsional stiffness is the capability of the catheter body to transmit a rotational load (torque) without untwisting, over-twisting and/or deforming. Torsional stiffness may be measured and characterized in conventional ways, and may be referred to as “torquability” herein. The torsional stiffness may control the capability of the catheter body to transmit a given amount of rotation applied at its proximal end (i.e., the handle) to achieve a comparable amount of rotation at its distal end (i.e, the cutter assembly). A higher torsional stiffness may be desirable, to better allow for rotational transmission along the atherectomy apparatus (i.e., around a guide wire), without twisting or deforming. A torsional stiffness that achieves a 1:1 relationship between rotation applied at the proximal end and the rotation observed at the distal end may be desirable for the catheter bodies described here.
(iv) Bending Stiffness (Trackability)
Another potentially desirable property for the catheter body comprises bending stiffness. Expressed in units of a bend radius (in inches), bending stiffness is the ability of the catheter shaft to bend in response to an applied bending force, without breaking or deforming (i.e., without taking a set). Bending stiffness is an extensive material property that can be measured and characterized in conventional ways, and may be referred to as “trackability” herein. Generally, a lower bending stiffness may be desirable to allow the catheter body to be navigated over a guide wire around sharp bends in the vasculature. A targeted bending stiffness of 0.5 inches (bend radius) or greater at mid-length of the catheter body may be desirable for the catheter bodies described here. If the catheter body includes an active deflection component at its distal end (as will be described in greater detail later), a targeted bending stiffness of 1.0″ (bend radius) at the deflectable distal end may be desirable for the catheter bodies described here. A prescribed minimum bend radius also makes it possible to coil the catheter body for packaging without taking a set.
Conventionally, trackability is thought to be inversely related to pushability/pullability and torquability. That is, greater pushability, pullability, and/or torquability in a catheter body may reduce the trackability of the catheter body. However, the catheter bodies described here may balance the pushability, pullability, torquability, and trackability for a given catheter body. The result may be a catheter body that is trackable, yet also possesses the requisite column strength, tensile strength, and torsional stiffness to be sufficiently pushable, pullable and torquable to allow navigation and advancement of a cutter assembly.
The overall trackability of a given catheter body (in terms of its ability to reliably navigate over a guide wire) may be influenced mainly by the physical and mechanical characteristics of the catheter body at its distal end. The pushability, pullability, and torquability may be influenced mainly by the physical and mechanical characteristics of the catheter body proximal to its distal end. That is, the overall configuration of different regions of a catheter body may impart characteristics to the overall length of the catheter body, which may allow for optimization of the overall pushability, pullability, torquability, and trackability of the catheter body.
3. Illustrative Catheter Body Variations
Generally, the column stiffness, tensile stiffness, torsional stiffness, and bending stiffness for a catheter body may be at least partially determined by its constituent material or materials, the dimensions of catheter body (e.g., the interior diameter, the outer diameter, wall thickness, etc.) and other structural features such as patterning.
A metal tube with some or all of the dimensions described immediately above may provide a high degree of pushability, pullability, and torquability, the baseline bending stiffness may limit the trackability of the catheter body given the length of the catheter body. Accordingly, in some variations, the bending stiffness of the metal tube may be incrementally modulated along the length of the catheter body by creating zones of cut patterns along at least a portion of the length of the catheter body. The cut patterns may be formed in any suitable manner (e.g., via laser cutting), and the zones may impart a desired profile of bending stiffness over the length of the catheter body. For example, cut pattern zones may be used to incrementally decrease the bending stiffness in a stepwise fashion from proximal end to distal end, to provide a minimum bending stiffness conducive to trackability at the distal end (where trackability is more desirable). The stepwise fashion in which the bending stiffness is decreased may be configured in a manner to help maintain the overall pushability, pullability, and torquability.
(i) Helical Cut Patterns
In some variations, one or more zones may comprise a helical cut pattern. For example,
For example, a cut pattern characterized as “Right Hand Thread, 100° Cut/30° Uncut, 0.012″ Pitch” may be used to describes a helical cut pattern that extends clockwise when viewed from the proximal end of the catheter body, in which the helical cuts thread 100 degrees about the longitudinal axis of the, the posts between helical cuts extend 30 degrees about the axis, and wherein helical cuts are axially separated by 0.012 inches.
Because the helical cuts take away material from the tube, the bending stiffness of the tube may decrease, and may allow the tube/catheter body to bend more easily (thereby increasing trackability). This change in bending stiffness may be at least partially determined by the arc of the helical cuts and posts, as well as the pitch of the helical cuts. The cut pattern just described can be characterized as a “three-post” pattern, which reflects that a ninety-degree region of uncut metal appears in the span of three post; i.e., n×30°=90°, where n=3, the number of posts.
In comparison, a cut pattern characterized as “Right Hand Thread, 135° Cut/45° Uncut, 0.012″ Pitch” may be used to describe a helical cut pattern that extends clockwise when viewed from the proximal end of the catheter body, in which the helical cuts thread 135 degrees about the longitudinal axis of the, posts between helical cuts extend 45 degrees about the axis, and wherein helical cuts are axially separated by 0.012 inches. This cut pattern can be characterized as a “two-post” pattern, which reflects that a ninety-degree region of uncut metal appears in the span of two post; i.e., n×45°=90°, where n=2, the number of posts.
As mentioned above, modifying the arc of the helical cuts, the arc of the posts, and/or the pitch of the helical cuts may alter the trackability of the catheter body. For example, increasing the arc of the helical cuts may decrease the bending stiffness and increase the trackability. Conversely, increasing the arc of the posts may increase the bending stiffness and decrease the trackability. Increasing the pitch may increase the bending stiffness while decreasing the pitch may decrease the bending stiffness. In some instances, it may be desirable for the pitch to be between about 0.006 inches and about 0.016 inches. A pitch below 0.006 inches may be difficult to achieve with conventional laser techniques as little uncut material remains, and in some instances a pitch above 0.016 inches may lose trackability.
By choosing a cut pattern, and/or by varying the cut pattern in a stepwise manner along the length of the catheter body, the bending stiffness of the catheter body can be incrementally reduced over its length to impart trackability, and may be done without diminishing the desired magnitudes of column stiffness, tensile stiffness, and torsional stiffness to a magnitude below that conducive to pushability, pullability, and torquability. As mentioned above, for some variations, the pitch may be varied between 0.006 inches and 0.016 inches to alter the bending stiffness.
The catheter bodies may have any number of zones/regions having different cut patterns (or in some zones, no cut pattern at all). For example, in the variation of atherectomy apparatus (600) shown in
(ii) Brickwork Cut Patterns
In some variations, one or more zones may comprise a brickwork cut pattern. For example,
As discussed immediately above, a cut pattern characterized as “Brick Work Cut Pattern, 90° Cut/30° Uncut, 0.011″ Pitch, Alternating” may be used to describe a brickwork cut pattern in which the brickwork cuts of a row extend 90 degrees about the axis, the posts of a row between brickwork cuts extend 30 degrees about the axis, successive rows are axially separated by 0.011 inches and a rotational offset by about 45 degrees.
The brickwork cut pattern, like the helical cut pattern, takes away material from the tube, which may reduce the bending stiffness of the tube and may allow the tube/catheter body to bend more easily (thereby increasing trackability). This change in bending stiffness may be at least partially determined by the arc of the brickwork cuts and posts, the pitch between rows, and the offset between rows.
The brickwork cut pattern just described can be characterized as a “three-post” pattern, which reflects that a ninety-degree region of uncut metal appears in the span of three posts; i.e., n×30°=90°, where n=3, the number of posts.
In comparison, a cut pattern characterized as “Brick Work Cut Pattern, 135° Cut/45° Uncut, 0.011″ Pitch, Alternating” may be used to describe a brickwork cut pattern in which the brickwork cuts of a row extend 135 degrees about the axis, the posts of a row between brickwork cuts extend 45 degrees about the axis, successive rows are axially separated by 0.011 inches and a rotational offset of 45 degrees This brickwork cut pattern can be characterized as a “two-post” pattern, which reflects that a ninety-degree region of uncut metal appears in the span of two post; i.e., n×45°=90°, where n=2, the number of posts.
As mentioned above, modifying the arc of the brickwork cuts, the arc of the posts, the pitch of the brickwork cuts, and/or the offset between rows may alter the trackability of the catheter body. For example, increasing the arc of the brickwork cuts may decrease the bending stiffness and increase the trackability. Conversely, increasing the arc of the posts may increase the bending stiffness and decrease the trackability. Increasing the pitch may increase the bending stiffness while decreasing the pitch may decrease the bending stiffness. In some instances, it may be desirable for the pitch to be between about 0.006 inches and about 0.016 inches. A pitch below 0.006 inches may be difficult to achieve with conventional laser techniques as little uncut material remains, and in some instances a pitch above 0.016 inches may lose trackability.
In transmitting an axial load (pushing or pulling) a catheter body having a brickwork pattern, as above described, may not undergo twisting, which may be experienced when the catheter body has a helically-cut pattern. Brickwork patterns may additionally exhibit an increased column, tensile, and torsional stiffness at a given bending stiffness.
By choosing a cut pattern, and/or by varying the cut pattern in a stepwise manner along the length of the catheter body, the bending stiffness of the catheter body can be incrementally reduced over its length to impart trackability, and may be done without diminishing the desired magnitudes of column stiffness, tensile stiffness, and torsional stiffness to a magnitude below that conducive to pushability, pullability, and torquability. As mentioned above, for some variations, the pitch may be varied between 0.006 inches and 0.016 inches to alter the bending stiffness.
The catheter bodies may have any number of zones/regions having different cut patterns (or in some zones, no cut pattern at all). For example, in the variation of atherectomy apparatus (700) shown in
A catheter body having either a helical cut pattern or a brickwork cut pattern can be lined or jacketed with a polymeric material, and further may be treated to produce hydrophilic, hydrophobic, or drug binding (heparin, antimicrobial) properties.
4. Catheter Body Rotation
In some variations, the catheter body can be coupled to a post on the handle that is sized and configured to rotate in response to rotation of a control knob. For example, the atherectomy apparatus (500) described above with respect to
It is also possible to apply torque to the catheter body by rotating the handle itself. Selective rotation of the cutter assembly can thus be finely controlled by a combination of control knob manipulation and handle twisting.
C. The Cutter Assembly
As mentioned above, the atherectomy device may comprise a cutter assembly. The cutter assembly may comprise a ferrule, a cutter housing, and a cutter comprising at least one cutter element. In variations in which the cutter assembly comprises a ferrule, the cutter assembly may be joined to the distal end of the catheter body by the ferrule.
1. The Cutter Housing
As mentioned previously, the cutter assembly may include a housing in which a cutter rotates. It may be desirable to maximize the outer diameter of the cutter assembly (and with it, the cutter housing) to maximize the cutting area that may be cut by the cutter assembly. The size of the cutter assembly may be limited depending on the intended intravascular path and the region targeted for treatment, to help reduce the likelihood that the cutter assembly will cut or otherwise damage the vessel wall.
In some of the variations described here, a cutter assembly sized for introduction through a 7 French guide sheath may have an outer diameter of about 2.4 mm (which, in some variations, may be larger than the outer diameter of a companion catheter body, as described in more detail above). A cutter assembly having such an outer diameter may be used, for example, for access to the larger vessels above the knee (e.g., vessels between about 4 mm and about 7 mm). In other variations described here, a cutter assembly sized for introduction through a 5 or 6 French guide sheath may have an outer diameter of about 1.8 mm to about 2.2 mm (which, in some variations, may be larger than the outer diameter of a companion catheter body, as described in more detail above). A cutter assembly having such an outer diameter may be used, for example, for access to the smaller vessels at or below the knee (e.g., vessels between about 2.5 mm and about 4 mm).
The housing may or may not be dynamic (i.e., able to rotate relative to the catheter body). In variations where the housing is dynamic, the housing may be configured to rotate at the same speed or at a different speed than the cutter elements. Additionally, the cutter housing may be dynamically driven to rotate in the same direction or in a counter direction relative to the cutter.
The leading edge of the cutter housing, which defines the periphery of the distal opening through which the cutter projects, may desirably be rounded and does not present a sharp distal edge. In these variations, a rounded distal housing may reduce the possibility that the peripheral edges of the housing catch on the wall of the guide sheath during introduction therethrough. Additionally, a rounded distal edge may also tend to glance off tissue without grabbing or catching on the tissue, which may minimize the resistance felt by the atherectomy apparatus during advancement. It should be appreciated that in some variations the cutter housing may have a sharp or beveled distal edge. In some of these variations, the cutter housing may have an inner bevel. In other variations, the cutter housing may have an outer bevel.
In some variations, the outside diameter of the cutter may be less than the inside diameter of the cutter housing to create a desired cutting gap between the two. A larger gap may produce a larger cutting volume, but too large of a gap may permit tissue to enter the cutter housing while bypassing the cutter. Representative dimensions will be described in more detail later. In other variations, the outside diameter of a portion of the cutter may be greater than or equal to the diameter of the cutter housing. In these variations, the cutter may cut a larger diameter of tissue, which may reduce the likelihood that the cutter housing rubs against tissue during advancement while cutting, thereby facilitating advancement of the device.
2. The Torque Shaft
Within the housing, the cutter may be rotationally driven by a torque shaft. The torque shaft may be, in turn, driven by the motor in the handle. The torque shaft may be fabricated from any suitable material, preferably one or more materials that may be consistent with the pushability, pullability, torquability, and trackability of the catheter body, as described above. For example, the torque shaft may comprise a metal braid and/or one or more metal coils, and one or more portions of the torque shaft embedded in a polymer, e.g., PEBAX, polyurethane, polyethylene, fluoropolymers, parylene, polyimide, PEEK, and/or PET. In some variations, the torque shaft may be made from a rigid material such as plastic, rendered flexible by incorporation of a spiral relief or groove.
In some variations (such as the torque shaft (522) depicted above with respect to
Generally, the torque shaft may be coupled to a cutter of a cutter assembly at or near the distal end of the torque shaft, and may be attached to the motor (e.g., by gearing) at or near the proximal end of the torque shaft. In some variations (such as the atherectomy apparatus (500) depicted in
3. The Geometry of the Cutting Elements
As mentioned above, in some variations, the cutter of a cutter assembly may comprise multiple cutting elements. For example, in the variation of the atherectomy apparatus (500) described above with respect to
The torque shaft may couple to a journal (532) in the second cutting element. When the first (512) and second (514) cutting elements are physically coupled together, the torque shaft may rotate both the first cutting element and second cutting element in unison. A proximal flange (534) on the second cutting element (514) may be seated within a relieved proximal groove (536) in the cutter housing (510). The relieved proximal groove (536) may serve as an axial retainer for the first (512) and second (514) cutting elements within the cutter housing.
(i) The First Cutting Element
The first cutting element may be machined to shape the structure of the helical flutes (802) within the desired hemispherical geometry. When supported in an extended, distally projecting relationship relative to the cutter housing (e.g., by virtue of the connection to a second cutting element, as described in more detail above), the hemispherical, fluted geometry may be sized and configured to optimize the capability of the cutting blade or blades to cut through and capture occlusive materials, while minimizing the risk of the cutting blade or blades grabbing or digging into tissue, wrapping tissue, and otherwise causing the motor to stall and overload.
The geometry of each flute may be purposely shaped for the above-mentioned purposes, and the flute geometry may be characterized with reference to a combination of angles (or ranges of angles), comprising a rake angle, a relief angle, a flute angle, and a helix angle. Additionally, while shown in
(a) Rake Angle
For each flute, the rake angle (806) (best shown in
In some variations, each flute of the first cutting element may possess a positive rake angle (i.e., the inner face of the cutting blade slants inward or back from the cutting edge). The positive rake angle of each flute is preferably large, and in some instances may be between greater than about 20 degrees. In some of these variations, the rake angle is preferably greater than about 40 degrees. In some of these variations, the rake angle may be between about 60 degrees and 80 degrees (referred herein as a “high” rake angle). In some variations, the rake angle may be between 65 degrees and 75 degrees. In some variations, the rake angle may be about 70 degrees.
Generally, a device having a positive high rake angle may be well suited for cutting occlusive materials having less calcium, which may have a fibrous, fleshy, and/or rubbery consistency. The rubbery consistency may cause conventional cutters to deflect away from these materials, causing conventional devices to lose trackability, but a high rake angle helps a cutter slice into this tissue while minimizing deflection of the cutter. Conventional cutter machining techniques generally cannot produce a positive high rake angle cutter, and these cutters generally have a small rake angle (less than about 15 degrees). Additionally, a larger rake angle may decrease the structural integrity of a cutter, which may the cutter more likely to chip or break during use. The cutters described here, however, may allow for the benefits of high rake angle cutting while reducing the risk of cutter malfunction.
The rake angle of the cutter may be modified depending on the nature of the tissue to be cut. For example, a cutter assembly intended to cut hard, calcified occlusive materials having a higher calcium content, may be configured to have a negative rake angle (i.e., the inner face of the cutting blade may slant outward or forward of the cutting edge), which may be well suited for grinding or smashing hardened occlusive materials. It should be appreciated that a given cutting element can be machined to incorporate cutting blades having both positive and negative rake angles or otherwise include combination of both cutting and grinding surfaces. For example, in some variations a cutter may comprise a first cutting element having a plurality of helical flutes, wherein at least one flute has a cutting edge having a positive rake angle and at least one flute has a cutting edge having a negative rake angle. In some of these variations, the helical flutes having cutting edges having a positive rake angle may have a positive rake angle greater than about 20 degrees (e.g., greater than about 40 degrees or about 70°±10°).
In the variation of first cutting element (800) shown in
(b) Relief Angle
For each flute, the relief angle (814) can be defined as the angle measured between (i) the tangent (816) drawn from the most radially distant edge (804) of the cutting blade (803) from radius (808) and (ii) the tangent (818) drawn along the outer face of the blade (803). The relief angle generally spans the gap between the cutting edge (804) and the occlusive material (812) surface to be cut (such as shown in
Generally, the relief angle is preferably a small angle less than or equal to about 10° (e.g. between about 0° and about 10°). In some of these variations, the relief angle may be about 0°. In some variations, it may be preferable to have a rake angle of about 70 degrees and a relief angle of about 0 degrees. In other variations, a helical flute may have a rake angle of about 60 degrees and a relief angle of about 10 degrees. The formation of a flute with a small relief angle may create a cutting edge (804) that may make aggressive contact with the occlusive materials (812) such as shown in
(c) Flute Angle
For each flute, the flute angle (824) can be defined in terms of a relationship with the rake angle and the relief angle, as follows:
Flute Angle=90°−(Rake Angle)−(Relief Angle)
The magnitude of the flute angle is an indication of how thick and sharp the cutting edge is. Given that, in a preferred embodiment, the rake angle may be in a range between about 60° and 80°; the relief angle may be in a range between of about 0° and 10°, the flute angle may be in range between about 0° and about 30°. Maximizing the rake angle and minimizing the relief angle to achieve efficient cutting conditions may result in a cutter geometry having a reduced flute angle. Accordingly, it may be desirable that the first cutting element be machined from a hard metallic material to include at a cutting edge that is a sharp as possible. In some variations, is may also be desirable to coat the cutting blade with a biocompatible, highly lubricious material with a low coefficient of friction (preferably no greater than 0.5) to help keep the cutting blade sharp during use. In these variations, coating materials such as titanium nitride or diamond-like carbon (DLC) may be used.
(d) Helix Angle
In the variation of the first cutting element (800) shown in
In some variations, each flute (802) of the first cutting element (800) may have a helix angle (802) between about 30° and 60°. A helix angle below 30° may increase the likelihood the first cutting element (800) may overload with occlusive material and stall, while a helix angle above 60° may diminish the cutting efficiency of the first cutting element (800).
(ii) The Second Cutting Element
As mentioned above, the cutter assembly may comprise a second cutting element. For example, in the variation of atherectomy apparatus (500) shown in
In some variations, the second cutting element is machined to include a hollow stem that fits within a center journal of the first cutting element. For example, in the variation of the atherectomy apparatus shown in
(iii) Two-Stage Cutting Action
The cutter assembly (506) shown in
4. Machining the Cutting Elements
The cutting elements described above may be machined in any suitable manner. For example,
In some variations, the first (1006) and second (1008) flutes may be milled with a flute helix angle, as shown in
The ball mill (1102) may be moved in an arc relative to the first cutting element (1100), to extend the cut formed by the ball mill (1102) until the longitudinal axis (1108) of the ball mill (1102) is positioned a distance (1116) away from the centerline (1114), as shown in
The ball mill (1102) may be moved distally (e.g., parallel to the longitudinal axis) to extend the cutting flutes, such as shown in
The dimensions described above may varied as necessary to provide a cutting flute (1104) having a desired rake angle (1124). For example, in variations in which the first cutting element (1100) is configured to have a diameter of about 2.4 mm and a rake angle (1120) of about 70 degrees, the ball mill (1102) diameter (1106) and radius (1112) may be about 0.0250 inches and about 0.0125 inches, respectively, and distance (1116) may be about 0.0330 inches. In variations in which the first cutting element (1100) is configured to have a diameter of about 2.2 mm and a rake angle (1120) of about 70 degrees, the ball mill (1102) diameter (1106) and radius (1112) may be about 0.0220 inches and about 0.0110 inches, respectively, and distance (1116) may be about 0.295 inches. In still other variations in which the first cutting element (1100) is configured to have a diameter of about 1.8 mm and a rake angle (1120) of about 70 degrees, the ball mill (1102) diameter (1106) and radius (1112) may be about 0.0130 inches and about 0.0065 inches, respectively, and distance (1116) may be about 0.0252 inches.
Also shown in
In some variations, the first (2706) and second (2712) flutes may be milled with a flute helix angle, as shown in
As mentioned above, in some variations a helical path may be milled into the cutting flute, but need not. For example,
The components may have any suitable dimensions. For example, the second cutting element may have a first outer diameter (1412) (including proximal flanges (1410)) and a second outer diameter (1414) (not including proximal flanges (1410)). The stem (1404) may have a height (1416) and an outer diameter (1418). The journal (1406) may have a diameter (1420), and the guide wire lumen (1408) may have a diameter (1422). The cutting flutes (1402) may have a height (1419), and the flanges (1410) may have a height (1420). To form the cutting flutes (1402), a ball mill having a tip radius (1424) may be centered a distance (1426) away from a centerline (1428). These dimensions may be at least partially determined by the desired size of the cutter assembly. It should also be appreciated that the cutting element may be rotated relative to ball mill (1424) during formation of the cutting flutes (1402) to provide a helical pathway of the cutting flutes (1402).
For example, in some variations where the second cutting element (1400) is configured to be used with a 2.4 mm cutter assembly, the first outer diameter (1412) may be about 0.089 inches, the second outer diameter (1414) may be about 0.083 inches, the stem (1404) may have a height (1416) of about 0.064 inches and an outer diameter (1418) of about 0.0298 inches, the diameter (1420) of the journal (1406) may be about 0.037 inches, the diameter (1422) of the guide wire lumen (1408) may be about 0.018 inches. In these variations, the cutting flutes (1402) may have a height (1419) of about 0.049 inches, and the flanges (1410) may have a height of about 0.007 inches. In some of these variations, the ball mill may have a tip radius (1424) of about 0.0250 inches and may be centered away from centerline (1428) by a distance (1426) of about 0.0330 inches.
In some variations where the second cutting element (1400) is configured to be used with a 2.2 mm cutter assembly, the first outer diameter (1412) may be about 0.0805 inches, the second outer diameter (1414) may be about 0.0735 inches, the stem (1404) may have a height (1416) of about 0.058 inches and an outer diameter (1418) of about 0.0275 inches, the diameter (1420) of the journal (1406) may be about 0.035 inches, the diameter (1422) of the guide wire lumen (1408) may be about 0.018 inches. In these variations, the cutting flutes (1402) may have a height (1419) of about 0.49 inches, and the flanges (1410) may have a height of about 0.007 inches. In some of these variations, the ball mill may have a tip radius (1424) of about 0.0220 inches and may be centered away from centerline (1428) by a distance (1426) of about 0.0295 inches.
In some variations where the second cutting element (1400) is configured to be used with a 1.8 mm cutter assembly, the first outer diameter (1412) may be about 0.063 inches, the second outer diameter (1414) may be about 0.057 inches, the stem (1404) may have a height (1416) of about 0.052 inches and an outer diameter (1418) of about 0.0245 inches, the diameter (1420) of the journal (1406) may be about 0.032 inches, the diameter (1422) of the guide wire lumen (1408) may be about 0.018 inches. In these variations, the cutting flutes (1402) may have a height (1418) of about 0.49 inches, and the flanges (1410) may have a height of about 0.007 inches. In some of these variations, the ball mill may have a tip radius (1424) of about 0.0130 inches and may be centered away from centerline (1428) by a distance (1426) of about 0.0252 inches.
D. Mechanical Removal of Occlusive Materials
As mentioned above, in some variations of the atherectomy apparatuses described here, the atherectomy apparatus includes an internal conveying member. For example, the variation of atherectomy apparatus (500) shown in
The occlusive materials carried back by the conveying element into the handle may be transferred into a discharge passage within the handle. A transfer propeller communicating with the discharge passage may be coupled to the torque shaft to rotate in common with the torque shaft, and may act to pump the cut, captured, and conveyed occlusive materials into the discharge passage. The discharge passage may include an external coupler (e.g., a leur connector) to couple the discharge passage to an external waste container. The cut and captured occlusive materials may be conveyed into the waste receptacle, and may be done so without need for vacuum aspiration. For example, as shown in
In some instances, it may be desirable to convey saline or another biocompatible fluid down the catheter body for mixing with occlusive material within the cutter assembly. Mixing the fluid with the occlusive materials may form a slurry, which may reduce the viscosity of the materials cut, captured, and conveyed from the vessel by the atherectomy apparatus. This may reduce the load imposed on the cutter assembly and facilitate the transfer of materials into the waste receptacle. As shown in
II. Deflectable Atherectomy Systems and Apparatuses
A. Overview
In some variations, the atherectomy systems described here may comprise an atherectomy apparatus configured to selectively dynamically deflect at its distal end (e.g., near a cutter assembly). Additionally, the atherectomy apparatus may be configured to selectively sweep a portion of the atherectomy apparatus, as will described in more detail below. For example,
The atherectomy apparatus (1800) may be used in an atherectomy system including a guide wire (1810), and may be introduced into a blood vessel from an external percutaneous access site such as described previously with respect in
Also shown in
The atherectomy apparatus (2000) may also further comprise an internal conveyor (2024), which may convey the occlusive materials from the cutter housing (2010) further back (proximally) along the catheter body for discharge outside the patient's body. In these variations, there may be no need for use of a vacuum pump.
B. The Catheter Body
1. Overview
As mentioned previously, the atherectomy apparatus (2000) may comprise a catheter assembly (2004). The catheter assembly may have any suitable dimensions, such as described in more detail above. For example, in some variations, the catheter assembly (2004) may have an outer diameter less than or equal to the outer diameter of the cutter assembly (2006), In some of these variations, the catheter assembly (2004) may have an outer diameter less than the outer diameter of the cutter assembly (2006). In some of these variations, a cutter assembly may have an outer diameter of 2.4 mm, and the catheter assembly may have an outer diameter of 2.2 mm. The catheter assembly may be configured to balance the column stiffness (pushability), tensile stiffness (pullability), torsional stiffness (torquability), and bending stiffness (trackability) of the catheter assembly, such as described in more detail below.
The catheter assembly (2004) may comprise an outer catheter shaft (2026), an inner catheter shaft (2028), and a sweep tube assembly comprising an inner sweep tube (2030) and an outer sweep tube (2032).
2. The Outer Catheter Shaft
The outer catheter shaft (2026) may be formed in any suitable manner. For example, the outer catheter shaft (2026) may be formed from a metal tube (e.g., a 304 stainless steel tube). The outer catheter shaft (2026) may have any suitable dimensions. For example, in some variations it may be desirable for the outer catheter shaft (2026) to be formed from a tube having an outside diameter of about 2.2 mm, a wall thickness of about 0.288 mm, and a length of about 1347 mm (53.03 inches).
As discussed previously, a metal tube with some or all of the dimensions described immediately above may provide a high degree of pushability, pullability, and torquability, the baseline bending stiffness may limit the trackability of the catheter body given the length of the catheter body. Accordingly, in some variations, the bending stiffness of the metal tube may be incrementally modulated along the length of the catheter body by creating zones of cut patterns along at least a portion of the length of the catheter body. The cut patterns may be formed in any suitable manner (e.g., via laser cutting), and the zones may impart a desired profile of bending stiffness over the length of the catheter body. For example, cut pattern zones may be used to incrementally decrease the bending stiffness in a stepwise fashion from proximal end to distal end, to provide a minimum bending stiffness conducive to trackability at the distal end (where trackability is more desirable). The stepwise fashion in which the bending stiffness is decreased may be configured in a manner to help maintain the overall pushability, pullability, and torquability.
For example,
In the variation shown in
The brickwork cut pattern takes away material from the tube, which may reduce the bending stiffness of the tube and may allow the tube/catheter body to bend more easily (thereby increasing trackability). This change in bending stiffness may be at least partially determined by the arc of the brickwork cuts and posts, the pitch between rows, and the offset between rows. The “four-post” brickwork (square) pattern described above with respect to
The catheter bodies may have any number of zones/regions having different cut patterns (or in some zones, no cut pattern at all). For example, in the variation of atherectomy apparatus (2100) shown in
As mentioned above, the outer catheter shaft can be lined or jacketed with a polymeric material, and further may be treated to produce hydrophilic, hydrophobic, or drug binding (heparin, antimicrobial) properties.
3. The Sweep Tube Assembly
As mentioned above, the catheter assembly (2004) shown above in
As will be described in greater detail below, within the outer sweep tube (2032), the inner catheter shaft (2028) may be coupled to the proximal end of the inner sweep tube (2030) (e.g., via inner coupler (2038)). Sliding the inner catheter shaft (2028) in a distal direction may cause the inner sweep tube (2030) to preferentially bend away from the center axis, thereby preferentially deflecting the cutter assembly toward a side wall of the vessel.
(a) The Outer Sweep Tube
The outer sweep tube (2032) may be formed from a metal tube (e.g., 304 stainless steel). As mentioned above the outer sweep tube (2032) may have a distal sweep portion (2034) and a proximal post portion (2036). The distal sweep portion (2034) and the proximal post portion (2036) may be formed from a single tube, or may be formed separately and joined (e.g., by spot welding). The distal sweep portion (2034) and proximal post portion (2036) may have any suitable lengths. In some variations, the distal sweep portion (2034) may have an axial length of about 0.450 inches and the proximal post portion (2036) may have an axial length of about 0.400 inches.
In some variations, the proximal post portion (2036) may comprise a cut pattern (such as one or more of the patterns described above) to decrease the bending stiffness of the proximal post portion (2036). In some of these variations, the proximal post portion (2036) may comprise a 135° cut/45° uncut alternating brickwork pattern with a pitch of about 0.12 inches. The highly flexible nature of such a two-post pattern may provide a flexible transition between the outer catheter body (2026) and the distal sweep portion (2034) of the outer sweep tube (2032).
The distal sweep portion (2034), conversely, may be configured to impart a preferential bending property in a predetermined direction. In some variations, the distal sweep portion (2034) may comprise a pattern of closed, interlocking cuts (which may be laser cut). In the variation shown in
In some variations, the interlocking cuts (2038) may comprise chamfered dovetail cuts. These cuts may provide a plurality of rows of material extending from the spine (2040). The rows (which may have an maximum uncut length of 0.25″ each) may be separated by about 0.007 inches of chamfered, dovetail cuts (at 67.4°). The interlocking cuts (2038) may have any number of dovetail cuts (e.g., twelve dovetail cuts along the circumference in each row). In some variations, the distal sweep portion (2034) may include with a proximal uncut region (adjacent the proximal post portion (2036), which may be about 0.01 inches in length) and a distal uncut region (adjacent the cutter assembly, which may be between about 0.025 inches to 0.35 inches). Additionally, in some variations a tab (2042) of uncut material may extend beyond the distal end in alignment with the spine (2040), which may form an outer tube alignment key, as will be described in greater detail later.
The laser-formed pattern of closed, interlocking cuts as just described may resist bending in any direction except in the direction of the spine (2040). When a bending force is applied, the interlocking cuts open to permit the bending to occur in the direction of the spine. Bending force in any other direction may be resisted, as the interlocking cuts are closed to resist bending in these directions.
(b) The Inner Sweep Tube
The inner sweep tube (2030) may be fabricated from a metal tube formed (e.g., nitinol). The inner sweep tube (2030) may extend axially within the outer sweep tube (2032) and may have any suitable dimensions. For example, in some variations the inner sweep tube (2030) may have an outer diameter of about 0.068 inches and an inner diameter of about 0.058 inches, and may have a total axial length of about 0.700 inches±0.005 inches.
In some variations, the baseline bending stiffness of the inner sweep tube (2030) may be reduced to impart a preferential bending property in a predetermined direction. In some of these variations, preferential bending may be created using a pattern of open, dovetail cuts (2048). In the variation shown in
The dovetail cuts (2048) may have any suitable dimensions. For example, in some variations the dovetail cuts (2048) each extend about 0.55 inches along the axis of the inner sweep tube (2030), and may include any number of dovetail cuts (2048). In some of these variations, the inner sweep tube (2030) may comprise eight dovetail cuts, which may extend about 0.60″ along the spine (2050). Additionally, in some variations a tab (2052) of uncut material may extend beyond the distal end in alignment with the spine (2050), which may form an inner tube alignment key, as will be described in greater detail later.
The laser-formed pattern of open cuts as just described permit preferential bending in the direction of the open cuts, away from the spine, until the open cuts come together and interfere in a distal to proximal succession. When a bending force is applied thereto, the open cuts may permit bending, but, as the bending continues, may resist bending as cuts close and interfere. A preformed bending radius may thereby be built into the inner sweep tube.
The inner sweep tube is inserted into the outer sweep tube, and the inner (2052) and outer alignment tabs (2042) may be brought into registration (see
As
(iii) The Inner Catheter Shaft
The inner catheter shaft (2028) of the atherectomy apparatus (2000) shown in
The tube of this material and configuration will provide a baseline column stiffness, tensile stiffness, torsional stiffness, and bending stiffness. In some variations, the bending stiffness of the metal tube may be incrementally modulated along the length of the catheter body by creating zones of cut patterns along at least a portion of the length of the catheter body. The cut patterns may be formed in any suitable manner (e.g., via laser cutting), and the zones may impart a desired profile of bending stiffness over the length of the catheter body. For example, cut pattern zones may be used to incrementally decrease the bending stiffness in a stepwise fashion from proximal end to distal end, to provide a minimum bending stiffness conducive to trackability at the distal end (where trackability is more desirable). The stepwise fashion in which the bending stiffness is decreased may be configured in a manner to help maintain the overall pushability, pullability, and torquability.
The pattern shown in
The patterns shown in
In some instances, there may be a gap between the inner and outer catheter such shafts, such that flushing fluid that may be conveyed down to the cutter assembly, for mixing with occlusive material within the cutter assembly. Mixing the fluid with the occlusive materials may form a slurry, which may reduce the viscosity of the materials cut, captured, and conveyed from the vessel by the atherectomy apparatus to reduce the load imposed on the cutter assembly and facilitate the transfer of materials into the waste receptacle, as has been previously described. An increased gap may provide a greater volume of fluid to the cutter assembly, which may in turn improve the mechanical conveyance of occlusive materials away from the long total occlusion, thereby reducing the chance of cutter overload and stalling.
(iv) The Mechanism of Deflection and Sweep
The distal end of the inner catheter shaft may be coupled to the inner sweep tube, and may control deflection of the catheter assembly. For example, in the variation of atherectomy apparatus (2000) described above with respect to
In the situation where the diameter of the inner catheter shaft is reduced to increase the gap dimension between the inner catheter shaft and the outer catheter shaft (as previously described, to accommodate a greater fluid volume), the coupling sleeve may be sized to locally step-up the distal diameter of the reduced diameter inner catheter shaft where it is coupled to the open boot of the inner sweep sleeve (i.e., the inner sweep tube need not be downsized when the inner catheter shaft is downsized), but it should be appreciated that in some instances the diameters of these components may be the same.
The proximal end of the inner catheter shaft may be coupled to a control knob (2056) on the handle (2002). The control knob (2056) may be advanced axially (distally) to advance the inner catheter shaft (2028) against the inner sweep tube (2030), to thereby apply a compressive force (as illustrated by arrow (2058) in
As shown in
When deflected, the catheter assembly may apply an apposition force upon the cutter assembly, which may be created by opposing contact of the outer catheter assembly against an opposite vessel wall when the cutter assembly (deflected at the end of the catheter) contacts the occlusive materials at a desirable attack angle (as shown
In some variations, the outer catheter shaft may be coupled to a post on the handle that may be sized and configured to rotate in response to rotation of the control knob (2056). While axial advancement of the control knob (2056) applies compressive force to the inner catheter shaft to deflect the cutter assembly (as described in more detail above), rotation of the control knob (2056) may apply a torque to the outer catheter shaft to rotate the cutter assembly. The cutter assembly may sweep in an arc within the vessel, to clear a diameter of occlusive materials that is greater than the outer diameter of the cutter assembly. It may also be possible to apply torque to the outer catheter shaft by rotating the handle itself. Selective rotation of the cutter assembly can thus be finely controlled by a combination of control knob manipulation and handle twisting.
An indexing mechanism may be provided to provide stepwise control of deflection and/or sweeping, with tactile and/or audible feedback, so that a user may maintain knowledge of the rotational position of the cutter assembly without taking their eye off the radiographic image.
(v) Passive and Active Steering
The enhanced, preferential bending properties of the trackable, deflectable catheter assembly may provide the capability to both actively and passively steer the atherectomy apparatus through tortuous intravascular anatomy.
Active steering may be accomplished by advancement of the inner catheter shaft to bend the distal catheter assembly, accompanied by rotation of the catheter assembly, to point the cutter assembly in a preferred direction through an intravascular path, with or without a guide wire, and/or to point the cutter assembly toward a side wall of a vessel, with apposition, to cut and capture occlusive materials. For example, the cutter assembly (2006) of atherectomy apparatus (2000) may be advanced into occlusive material (1900) in a vessel (1902), as shown in
Passive steering may be accomplished without advancement of the inner catheter shaft, when the cutter assembly (2006) encounters a bend in the intravascular path (see
Successive bends in a tortuous path may be navigated in the same passive manner, by rotating the catheter body at each successive bend (e.g., by rotating the control knob or by rotation of the handle itself) to orient the preferential deflection of the catheter assembly away from the respective inner bend radius, and without the need to actively steer by manipulation of the inner catheter shaft.
In some variations, the catheter assembly (2004) may include one or more radiographic markings to indicate during radiographic guidance the orientation of the preferential bend direction of the catheter assembly, whether left, or right, or toward the viewer, or away from the viewer.
Generally, a distal portion (1606) of the second catheter (1604) may be shaped to take on a deflected position as shown in
As mentioned above, the first catheter (1602) may be moved relative to the second catheter (1604) to move the atherectomy apparatus between deflected and undeflected configurations. Specifically, the first catheter (1602) may comprise a distal portion (1622) and a proximal portion (not shown), where the distal portion (1622) is more flexible than the proximal portion. Additionally, the distal portion (1622) of the first catheter (1602) may be more flexible than the distal portion (1606) of the second catheter (1604), while the proximal portion of the first catheter (1602) may be stiffer than the distal portion (1606) of the second catheter (1604). Accordingly, the first catheter (1602) may be advanced such that the flexible distal portion (1622) of the first catheter (1602) extends beyond the distal end of the second catheter (1604), which may the proximal portion of the first catheter (1602) within the distal portion (1606) of the second catheter (1604) (or around the distal portion (1606) of the second catheter (1604) in variations where the second catheter (1604) is positioned inside the first catheter (1602). Because the proximal portion of the first catheter (1602) is stiffer than the distal portion of the second catheter (1604), axial alignment of these catheter segments may cause the proximal portion of the first catheter (1602) to straighten out the curves of the distal portion of the second catheter (1604), thereby placing the atherectomy apparatus (1600) in an undeflected configuration, as shown in
To move the atherectomy apparatus to a deflected configuration, the first catheter (1602) may be withdrawn to place the flexible distal portion (1622) of the first catheter (1602) in axial alignment with the distal portion (1606) of the second catheter (1604). Because the distal portion (1606) of the second catheter (1604) is stiffer than the distal portion (1622) of the first catheter (1602), the second catheter (1604) may cause the flexible distal portion (1622) of the first catheter (1602) to take on the dual-curve configuration described above with respect to
III. Methods of Use
A. Atherectomy in Peripheral Regions
(i) Overview
When atherectomy is indicated, an intravascular atherectomy device as described herein can be introduced into a left or right limb through an iliac artery by an ipsilateral (same side) or a contralateral (opposite side) approach. In some variations, the atherectomy device may be advanced over a guide wire, through a guide sheath, and into the blood vessel. A user may manipulate a handle of the atherectomy apparatus to advance and navigate the device, and in some instances the advancement may be aided by radiographic visualization to gain access to the targeted treatment region, where occlusive materials are located.
The atherectomy device can be advanced distally through the CFA and into the SFA and, in some variations, further at or below the knee. In some variations, a catheter body/catheter assembly may have sufficient trackability to follow the guide wire through the often tortuous intravascular paths to the region targeted for treatment. The catheter body/catheter assembly may also have pushability, pullability, and torquability to allow the cutter assembly to be pushed, pulled, and/or rotated through occlusive material in the vessels. The trackability of the catheter body while being pushed, pulled, and rotated through occlusive material may allow the atherectomy apparatus to reliably follow the path of the guide wire.
A family of atherectomy apparatus can be provided having these combinations of technical features, sized according to the anatomy to be treated and the guide sheaths to be used. For example, an atherectomy apparatus comprising a 1.8 mm cutter assembly supported on the distal end of a 1.6 mm catheter body may be deployed through a 5 F or larger guide sheath for access to smaller vessels (e.g., 2.5 mm to 3.0 mm) for removal of occlusive materials in one or more straight passes (e.g., without deflection) through the occlusive materials. Additionally or alternatively, an atherectomy apparatus comprising a 2.2 mm cutter assembly supported on the distal end of a 1.6 mm catheter body, may be deployed through a 6 F or larger guide sheath for access to larger vessels (e.g., 3.0 mm to 4.0 mm) for removal of occlusive materials in one or more straight passes through the occlusive materials. Additionally or alternatively, an atherectomy apparatus comprising a 2.4 mm cutter assembly supported on the distal end of a 2.2 mm catheter body, may be deployed through a 7 F or larger guide sheath for access to larger vessels (e.g., 3.0 mm to 4.5 mm) for removal of occlusive materials one or more straight passes through the occlusive materials.
(ii) Increasing Luminal Gain by Deflection and Sweeping
If desired, a given atherectomy apparatus may be sized and configured to be deflected and swept, so that the cutter assembly be deflected and swept while cutting occlusive materials. For example, a deflectable 2.4 mm cutter assembly supported on the distal end of a 2.2 mm catheter body can include may be deployed through a 7 F guide sheath to remove occlusive materials in still larger vessels (e.g., 4.0 mm to 7.0 mm). A deflectable cutter assembly may allow a specific atherectomy apparatus to treat a range of vessel size or vessels that may be asymmetric. By deflecting the distal cutter assembly in a controlled fashion in situ, the caregiver may be able to purposefully point the cutter assembly toward a particular region of the lesion, which may be useful in treating asymmetric vessels.
(iii) Treating Chronic Total Occlusions
Through progressive plaque growth or fibrotic organization of occlusive thrombus, atherosclerosis may result in chronic total occlusion (CTO) of a major arterial conduit. The success of catheter-based treatment techniques may depend significantly upon the nature of the occlusion (e.g., its length, duration, tortuosity, and degree of calcification). Devices sized and configured to cross CTO's preferably possess an ability to distinguish a true luminal path from one created within (dissection) or through (perforation) the vessel wall of the occluded segment; an ability to change direction (steer) to correct deviations from the desired path through the occlusion; and an ability to penetrate the frequently fibrotic and focally calcified substance of the occlusion through the use of high cutting efficiency and mechanical stiffness.
The technical features of the highly efficient cutting elements disclosed herein, in combination with the degree of trackability coupled with pushability, pullability, and toquability of the catheter bodies disclosed herein, may allow the atherectomy apparatus to be tailored for use to treat CTO's in the vasculature. For example,
The atherectomy apparatus described herein may possess the combination of technical features that may be optimized to cross a CTO and reenter the distal true lumen from a subintimal location over a guide wire.
(iv) Delivery of Bioactive Materials
It may be desirable, in conjunction with using the atherectomy apparatus as described above, to introduce into the region a bioactive material, comprising, for example, a restenosis-inhibiting agent, a thrombus-inhibiting agent, an anti-inflammatory agent, combinations thereof and the like. The bioactive material can be introduced as a coating on a balloon that may be expanded into contact with the region to deliver the bioactive material, and/or may be delivered using the atherectomy apparatus.
B. Atherectomy to Treat In-Stent Restenosis
In some variations, the atherectomy systems described herein may be used to treat in-stent restenosis. As described in more detail above, in some instances a stent may be placed in a blood vessel (e.g., following angioplasty). Generally, the stent may act to hold an artery open. For example,
When a stent is placed in a blood vessel, new tissue may grow inside the stent, and may cover one or more portions of the stent. Initially, this new tissue may include healthy cells from the lining of the arterial wall, which may allow blood to flow smoothly over the stented area without clotting. In some instances, scar tissue or other occlusive material may later form underneath the new healthy lining, and may obstruct the blood flow through the vessel. This condition may be referred to as “in-stent restenosis”. For example,
The occlusive tissue (2604) within the stent (2602) is typically hyperplastic, smooth muscle tissue, with little calcium, having the rubbery, elastic properties of occlusive materials having less calcium, with a consistency that is fibrous and fleshy. For this reason, it may be desirable for the atherectomy apparatus in these methods to comprise at least one cutting flute having a positive rake angle, such as one or more of the high rake angle cutting elements described above. Additionally, in some variations it may be desirable for a cutting element to have an atraumatic rounded profile (e.g., the hemispherical profile of the first cutting elements described in more detail above). Cutting elements having a rounded profile and positive rake angle cutting elements may help prevent a cutting assembly from damaging or otherwise negatively interacting with a stent placed in the vessel.
In variations where the atherectomy apparatus (2606) is configured to selectively deflect a distal portion of the atherectomy apparatus (2606), the distal end of the atherectomy apparatus (2606) may be deflected and rotated to sweep the cutter in an arc. The cutter assembly (2610) may be operated during deflection and rotation to cut tissue in a region larger than an outer diameter of the cutter assembly (2610, as shown in
It may be desirable, in conjunction with using the atherectomy apparatus as described above, to introduce into the region a bioactive material, comprising, for example, a restenosis-inhibiting agent, a thrombus-inhibiting agent, an anti-inflammatory agent, combinations thereof and the like. The bioactive material can be introduced as a coating on a balloon that may be expanded into contact with the region to deliver the bioactive material, and/or may be delivered using the atherectomy apparatus.
The region of restenosis can comprise a peripheral blood vessel, e.g., a peripheral blood vessel in a leg above, at, or below the knee. Additionally, while described immediately above to treat in-stent restenosis, it should also be appreciated that the methods described here may be used to treat restenosis of a vessel that does not include a stent.
The foregoing is considered as illustrative only of the principles of the invention. Furthermore, since numerous modifications and changes will readily occur to those skilled in the art, it is not desired to limit the invention to the exact construction and operation shown and described. While the preferred embodiment has b en described, the details may be changed without departing from the invention.
This application is a continuation of U.S. Application Serial No. 13/652,352, filed Oct. 15, 2012, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Serial No. 61/546,888, filed on Oct. 13, 2011 and titled “ATHERECTOMY APPARATUS, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS,” the content of each of which is hereby incorporated in its entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3358472 | Klipping | Dec 1967 | A |
| 4167944 | Banko | Sep 1979 | A |
| 4445509 | Auth | May 1984 | A |
| 4598710 | Kleinberg et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
| 4631052 | Kensey | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4669469 | Gifford, III et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4690140 | Mecca | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4696667 | Masch | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4770652 | Mahurkar | Sep 1988 | A |
| 4781186 | Simpson et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4790812 | Hawkins, Jr. et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
| 4804364 | Dieras et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4808153 | Parisi | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4844064 | Thimsen et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4857045 | Rydell | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4857046 | Stevens et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4867157 | McGurk-Burleson et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4886490 | Shiber | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4887599 | Muller | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4894051 | Shiber | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4911148 | Sosnowski et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4950277 | Farr | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4994067 | Summers | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5074841 | Ademovic et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5100426 | Nixon | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5122134 | Borzone et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5231989 | Middleman et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5242461 | Kortenbach et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5267955 | Hanson | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5282813 | Redha | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5282821 | Donahue | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5284128 | Hart | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5312427 | Shturman | May 1994 | A |
| 5314438 | Shturman | May 1994 | A |
| 5320635 | Smith | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5334211 | Shiber | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5356418 | Shturman | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5358472 | Vance et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5360432 | Shturman | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5370609 | Drasler et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5372587 | Hammerslag et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5409454 | Fischell et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5423799 | Shiu | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5429604 | Hammersmark et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5429617 | Hammersmark et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5431173 | Chin et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5456680 | Taylor et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5474532 | Steppe | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5489291 | Wiley | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5501653 | Chin | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5520609 | Moll et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5529580 | Kusunoki et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5540706 | Aust et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5554163 | Shturman | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5556408 | Farhat | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5569197 | Helmus et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5584843 | Wulfman et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5618294 | Aust et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5626562 | Castro | May 1997 | A |
| 5632755 | Nordgren et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5634883 | Chin et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5643178 | Moll et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5643251 | Hillsman et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5643297 | Nordgren et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5643298 | Nordgren et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5649941 | Lary | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5665062 | Houser | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5665098 | Kelly et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5669926 | Aust et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5690634 | Muller et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5690643 | Wijay | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5695506 | Pike et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5716327 | Warner et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5725543 | Redha | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5728129 | Summers | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5733297 | Wang | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5743456 | Jones et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5746758 | Nordgren et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5755731 | Grinberg | May 1998 | A |
| 5766196 | Griffiths | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5779721 | Nash | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5782834 | Lucey et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5820592 | Hammerslag | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5843103 | Wulfman | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5851208 | Trott | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5851212 | Zirps et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5873882 | Straub et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5876414 | Straub | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5882329 | Patterson et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5882333 | Schaer et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5895399 | Barbut et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5897566 | Shturman et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5902263 | Patterson et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5902313 | Redha | May 1999 | A |
| 5941869 | Patterson et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5941893 | Saadat | Aug 1999 | A |
| 6001112 | Taylor | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6015420 | Wulfman et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6027514 | Stine et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6042593 | Storz et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6048339 | Zirps et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6053923 | Veca et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6066153 | Lev | May 2000 | A |
| 6080170 | Nash et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6090118 | McGuckin, Jr. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6132444 | Shturman et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6139557 | Passafaro et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6142955 | Farascioni et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6146395 | Kanz et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6152938 | Curry | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6156046 | Passafaro et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6165209 | Patterson et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6206898 | Honeycutt et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6238405 | Findlay, III et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6241744 | Imran et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6258098 | Taylor et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6264630 | Mickley et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6299622 | Snow et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6319242 | Patterson et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6355027 | Le et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6371928 | McFann et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6406442 | McFann et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6451036 | Heitzmann et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6454779 | Taylor | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6482215 | Shiber | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6482217 | Pintor et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6494890 | Shturman et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6554846 | Hamilton et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6562049 | Norlander et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6565588 | Clement et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6572630 | McGuckin, Jr. et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6579298 | Bruneau et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6579299 | McGuckin, Jr. et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6596005 | Kanz et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6602264 | McGuckin, Jr. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6623495 | Findlay, III et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6629953 | Boyd | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6638233 | Corvi et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6638288 | Shturman et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| RE38335 | Aust et al. | Nov 2003 | E |
| 6656195 | Peters et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6666854 | Lange | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6666874 | Heitzmann et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6682545 | Kester | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6702830 | Demarais et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6746422 | Noriega et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6758851 | Shiber | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6790215 | Findlay, III et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6800085 | Selmon et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6808531 | Lafontaine et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6818001 | Wulfman et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6818002 | Shiber | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6830577 | Nash et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6843797 | Nash et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6860235 | Anderson et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6876414 | Hara et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6936056 | Nash et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6997934 | Snow et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7008375 | Weisel | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7025751 | Silva et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7033357 | Baxter et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7037316 | McGuckin, Jr. et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| RE39152 | Aust et al. | Jun 2006 | E |
| 7172610 | Heitzmann et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7235088 | Pintor et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7316697 | Shiber | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7344546 | Wulfman et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7344548 | Toyota et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7381198 | Noriega et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7399307 | Evans et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7479147 | Honeycutt et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7534249 | Nash et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7666161 | Nash et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7875018 | Tockman et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7981128 | To et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 8007500 | Lin et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8007506 | To et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8070762 | Escudero et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8236016 | To et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8337516 | Escudero et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8361094 | To et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8469979 | Olson | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8517994 | Li et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8545447 | Demarais et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8568432 | Straub | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8579926 | Pintor et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8585726 | Yoon et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8628549 | To et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8647355 | Escudero et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8795306 | Smith | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 9345511 | Smith | May 2016 | B2 |
| 20010004700 | Honeycutt et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
| 20010005909 | Findlay et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
| 20020004680 | Plaia et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020007190 | Wulfman et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020029057 | McGuckin | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020077642 | Patel | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020151918 | Lafontaine et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020169467 | Heitzmann et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020198550 | Nash et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030018346 | Follmer et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030078606 | Lafontaine et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030100911 | Nash et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030114869 | Nash et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030125758 | Simpson et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030139751 | Evans et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030139802 | Wulfman et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20040006358 | Wulfman et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040087988 | Heitzmann et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040097995 | Nash et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040102772 | Baxter et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040147934 | Kiester | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040167553 | Simpson et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040167554 | Simpson et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040181249 | Torrance et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040199051 | Weisel | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040220519 | Wulfman et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040230212 | Wulfman | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040230213 | Wulfman et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040235611 | Nistal | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040236312 | Nistal et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040243162 | Wulfman et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050004585 | Hall et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050020974 | Noriega et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050059990 | Ayala et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050113853 | Noriega et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050149084 | Kanz et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050177068 | Simpson | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050197661 | Carrison et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050222519 | Simpson | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050240146 | Nash et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20060020327 | Lashinski et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060074442 | Noriega et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060229646 | Sparks | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060239982 | Simpson | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060241564 | Corcoran et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20070135733 | Soukup et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070225739 | Pintor et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070250000 | Magnin et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070282303 | Nash et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070282350 | Hernest | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070282358 | Remiszewski et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080004643 | To et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080004645 | To et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080045986 | To et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080103516 | Wulfman et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080140101 | Carley et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080234715 | Pesce et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080249364 | Korner | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20090018565 | To et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090018566 | Escudero | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090018567 | Escudero et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090024085 | To et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20100010492 | Lockard et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100174302 | Heitzmann et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100324567 | Root et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100324576 | Pintor et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110040315 | To et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110112563 | To et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110152906 | Escudero et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110152907 | Escudero et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110270289 | To et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110301626 | To et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20130085515 | To et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130090674 | Escudero et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130096587 | Smith et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130103062 | To et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130103063 | Escudero et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130158578 | Ghodke et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130296901 | Olson | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20140039532 | Vrba | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 0817594 | Jan 1998 | EP |
| 0817595 | Jan 1998 | EP |
| 1158910 | Dec 2001 | EP |
| 1176915 | Feb 2002 | EP |
| 1315460 | Jun 2003 | EP |
| 1722694 | Nov 2006 | EP |
| 1870044 | Dec 2007 | EP |
| 0254414 | Jan 2013 | EP |
| 2641551 | Sep 2013 | EP |
| 1-131653 | May 1989 | JP |
| 2006-511256 | Oct 1996 | JP |
| 08509639 | Oct 1996 | JP |
| 09508554 | Sep 1997 | JP |
| 11-506358 | Jun 1999 | JP |
| 2001-522631 | Nov 2001 | JP |
| 2002-538876 | Nov 2002 | JP |
| 2004-503265 | Feb 2004 | JP |
| 2004-514463 | May 2004 | JP |
| 9201423 | Feb 1992 | WO |
| 9424946 | Nov 1994 | WO |
| 9521576 | Aug 1995 | WO |
| 9629941 | Oct 1996 | WO |
| 9629942 | Oct 1996 | WO |
| 9923958 | May 1999 | WO |
| 9935977 | Jul 1999 | WO |
| 0054659 | Sep 2000 | WO |
| 0174255 | Oct 2001 | WO |
| 0176680 | Oct 2001 | WO |
| 2005084562 | Sep 2005 | WO |
| 2005123169 | Dec 2005 | WO |
| 2007010389 | Sep 2007 | WO |
| 2008005888 | May 2008 | WO |
| 2008005891 | May 2008 | WO |
| 2009054968 | Apr 2009 | WO |
| 2009005779 | May 2009 | WO |
| 2009126309 | Oct 2009 | WO |
| 2013056262 | Apr 2013 | WO |
| 2013172970 | Nov 2013 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 12840013.2, dated Aug. 25, 2015, 11 pages. |
| Ikeno et al., 2004, “Initial Experience with the Novel 6 Fr-Compatible System for Debulking De Novo Coronary Arterial Lesions,” Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 62:308-17. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Aug. 6, 2010, for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US09/02253, filed on Apr. 10, 2009, 12 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jan. 6, 2009, for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2007/072570, filed on Jun. 29, 2007, 4 pages. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jun. 30, 2010, for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2008/012012, filed on Oct. 22, 2008, 11 pages. |
| International Search Report dated Aug. 12, 2009, for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US09/02253, filed on Apr. 10, 2009, 1 page. |
| International Search Report dated Feb. 12, 2009, for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US08/12012, filed on Oct. 22, 2008, 1 page. |
| International Search Report dated Mar. 12, 2013, for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US12/60316, filed on Oct. 15, 2012, 5 pages. |
| International Search Report dated Oct. 29, 2008, for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US08/08140, filed on Jun. 30, 2008, 1 page. |
| International Search Report dated Sep. 18, 2008, for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2007/072574, filed on Jun. 29, 2007, 1 page. |
| International Search Report dated Sep. 3, 2008, for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US07/72570, filed on Jun. 29, 2007, 1 page. |
| Kanjwal et al., 2004, “Peripheral Arterial Disease—The Silent Killer,” JK-Practitioner 11(4):225-32. |
| Nakamura et al., 2002, “Efficacy and Feasibility of Helixcision for Debulking Neointimal Hyperplasia for In-Stent Restenosis,” Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 57:460-66. |
| Supplementary European Search Report dated Aug. 21, 2013, for EP Patent Application No. 09730501.5, filed on Nov. 4, 2010, 5 pages. |
| Supplementary European Search Report dated Jun. 20, 2011, for EP Patent Application No. 08779894.8, filed on Jun. 30, 2008, 7 pages. |
| Supplementary European Search Report dated Jun. 26, 2013, for EP Patent Application No. 08841648, filed on May 21, 2010, 5 pages. |
| Supplementary Partial European Search Report dated Apr. 24, 2015, for EP Patent Application No. 12840013, filed Oct. 15, 2012, 6 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20160235434 A1 | Aug 2016 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61546888 | Oct 2011 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 13652352 | Oct 2012 | US |
| Child | 15138776 | US |
