This invention relates to an economical and efficient manner for replacement of existing athletic floors that have exhausted wear life or experienced issues requiring replacement. More particularly, the invention relates to a worn athletic floor having supporting sleepers connected to a ground substrate and the sleepers being resiliently retrofit with a new athletic floor, and preferably using a new method, to have new wear life as taught herein.
Hardwood athletic floor systems typically provide a wear life of 50 years and longer depending on original flooring board thickness. Floors that are now frequently being replaced include wood sections referred to as sleepers, which were leveled over undulating concrete surfaces with assorted shims in various thicknesses. Sleepers were then secured to the substrate with anchoring fasteners penetrating the concrete. Such a method is illustrated in U.S. Pat. No. 1,587,355 by H. W. Raun introduced in 1926 and frequently installed into the 1970's.
In the most customary application, poured grout was included to fill cavities between the underside of sleepers and concrete surfaces with the finished pour reaching upward slightly higher than the underside of the sleepers. Poured hot tar was also used as a method of filling cavities below sleepers and normally also settled slightly above the underside of the sleepers. An added layer of subfloor material, commonly ¾ inch by 5 and ½ inch random length softwood boards were normally installed diagonally to the sleeper direction before attachment of tongue and groove type random length flooring.
Replacement of such floor systems creates numerous challenges, especially with the added preference to introduce resilience as is normally included in today's hardwood athletic floor systems. Removal of existing floor systems as described above commonly requires excessive labor and demolition especially when removing sleepers that are soundly secured to concrete. Preparation for installation of a new resilient hardwood athletic floor includes removal of poured grout, or tar filler that frequently includes hazardous materials requiring special abatement which creates health concerns and significant added disposal cost.
Beyond the cost and health concerns of full floor system removal, added material and labor cost become necessary after total demolition of the previous floor. Cavities commonly remain in the concrete surface after sleeper anchors must be forcefully removed which requires extensive patching. Such sleeper type systems that where acceptably shimmed over undulated concrete surfaces result in very uneven substrates after removal thus requiring expensive and time-consuming project delays to bring the substrate into acceptable tolerance.
In addition to challenges associated with removal and preparation work for installation of a new athletic floor system, resilient floors which are now desired frequently have profile heights differing from the original floor height. Solutions commonly require additional components to elevate floor system options or undesired ramps at doorways and/or adjacent surfaces to address uneven transitions.
To address one or more of the deficiency discussed above, there is a need for a new athletic floor and method that improves current technology or techniques for replacing worn athletic floors.
As demonstrated in the following descriptions, my new athletic floor provides a manner to economically and efficiently replace common athletic floor systems that have exhausted wear life or are desired to be replaced by present-day resilient athletic floors as much as possible without completely having to remove the entire existing worn athletic floor. The invention takes advantage of allowing existing sleepers to remain in place rather than typical complete disposal of all components of the existing floor assembly. Thereby eliminating associated labor costs required for removal of sleepers and grout or asphalt filler, as well as fastening components embedded into the concrete substrate. Furthermore, the invention can eliminate the necessity of addressing hazardous materials such as asbestos included in hot poured asphalt commonly used in construction prior to understanding associated health risks. This can also help in eliminating significant labor costs, as well as added delays in construction schedules and disposal of hazardous material. For example, eliminating labor and patching material required to address fractures following removal of embedded concrete anchors, and/or leveling the original concrete base that is commonly found to be especially uneven and undulated.
Further, my new athletic floor can take advantage of existing sleepers remaining from the original floor system installation which are typically level and, in most instances, have sound integrity or require a modest number of replacement sections. I also provide a new athletic floor method to introduce resiliency and provide a newly completed floor which is equal or within an acceptable profile height tolerance equivalent to the original floor or new floor standards. That is, providing an equivalent profile height can also maintain desired flush transition to bordering surfaces without requiring special ramping at doorways or other adjacent floor surfaces. Still further, this can also help to protect resilient components and related assemblies from excessive compression when the floor surface is pressured under non-athletic loads.
In view of the foregoing, described herein in one embodiment is a new athletic floor resiliently retrofit to a worn athletic floor comprising a supporting sleeper connected to a ground substrate. The worn athletic floor includes a channel section connected to the supporting sleeper. The channel section includes a top plate located between and connected to each of a left vertical side wall spaced apart from a right vertical side wall. The left vertical side wall is including a left horizontal flange extending outward from the top plate and the right vertical side wall is including a right horizontal flange extending outward from the top plate. A left resilient pad is resting on the left horizontal flange and a right resilient pad is resting on the right horizontal flange. A new floor is resting on the left resilient pad and the right resilient pad and is spaced from the top plate a first distance in a first resilient compression condition.
In another embodiment there is a method to resiliently retrofit a worn athletic floor to have new wear life. The worn athletic floor includes a supporting sleeper connected to a ground substrate. The method includes the following steps, generally in this order but not required to be so as long as the desired retrofit floor is achieved. One step is connecting a channel section to the supporting sleeper. The channel section has a top plate including a left horizontal flange extending outward from the top plate and a right horizontal flange extending outward from the top plate. Another step is resting a left resilient pad on the left horizontal flange and a right resilient pad on the right horizontal flange. A next step is locating a new floor on the left resilient pad and the right resilient pad. And then, a step is compressing the resilient pads a first distance in response to a first resilient compression condition.
Other embodiments are direct to the vertical side walls and their configurations, the horizontal flanges and their configurations, the new floor and its components as well as its connected configuration with the supporting sleeper, and the resiliently retrofit functionality of the worn athletic floor in response to compressive forces applied to the new floor during use.
As used herein, “connect” (and formatives thereof, including connected and connecting) means the components or parts are attached to each other and would require a force to separate them.
As used herein, “directly” means there is substantially no intervening components or function that adversely impacts the relatedness of the two components or their functions.
As used herein, “indirectly” means there is some intervening components or function that separates the relatedness of the two components or their functions but still allows enough of the relatedness of the two components to exist to accomplish the stated purpose, e.g., being connected, being adjacent, and/or in combination with another function like movable.
As used herein, “horizontal” (and formatives thereof) means a plane parallel to the ground substrate including being within plus or minus about 30 degrees of parallel to the ground substrate.
As used herein, “vertical” (and formatives thereof) means a plane perpendicular to the ground substrate including being within plus or minus about 30 degrees of perpendicular to the ground substrate.
The invention may be more completely understood in consideration of the following detailed description of various embodiments of the invention in connection with the accompanying drawings, in which:
The drawings show some but not all embodiments. The elements depicted in the drawings are illustrative and not necessarily to scale, and the same (or similar) reference numbers denote the same (or similar) features throughout the drawings.
In reference to
In accordance with the practice of at least one embodiment of the invention, as seen in
In reference to
In terms of its material make up or manufacture, channel section 106 can be steel or other rigid material, and is a preferably made of 14-gauge to 18-gauge steel and more preferably 16-gauge steel but can be other than steel and metal such as hard plastics or composites of metal, plastic and other material in a solid state at room temperature that has the desired strength and rigidity as taught herein. Horizontal flanges 109a, 109b preferably extend outward about one inch from the vertical side walls 108a, 108b and range from about ¾ inch to 2 inches. Horizontal flanges 109 are preferably about 4 inches long and preferably no less than about 2 inches in length with length reaching as long as about 8 feet. Outer vertical side walls 108a, 108b preferably measure about ¼ inch in height and can range in height from about ⅛ inch to 1 inch, with length dimension as described above for horizontal flanges 109a, 109b. The top plate 107 preferably measures about 4 inches wide and 4 inches in length (e.g.,
In reference to
As seen throughout, resilient pads 111a, 111b can measure about 1 inch wide by 4 inches long by ½ inch thick, in a preferred embodiment. When desired to be connected to the horizontal flanges and not just resting there, hot melt adhesive or another suitable adhesive or adhesive-like material can be used. Suitable pad dimensions can range from about ¾ inch to 2 inches in width, about 2 inches to 8 feet in length, and about ⅜ inch to 1 and ¼ inches in thickness. Resilient pads 106 can be manufactured from recycled rubber/foam having a density value of about 18-28 PCF (pounds per cubic foot, as determined by one of ordinary skill in the art using the athletic floor industry standard for measuring this parameter) and measure about 22-24 PCF for preferred applications. Pad material is not limited to recycled rubber/foam and can be provided by other resilient material (e.g., polyurethane open cell foam, polyethylene closed cell foam, natural rubber, synthetic rubber), as long as the desired PCF is attained. In this regard, the desired PCF is dependent upon the retrofit floor's desired resiliency characteristics for its useful life including loaded and loaded conditions and during athletic play as well as moving loads over the new floor in between athletic play, and can be determined by one or ordinary skill in the art in combination with the teachings herein.
In reference to
Now, with specific reference to
Further in regards to system 20, resilient pads 111a, 111b can be resting and/or connected as previously described and are preferably spaced at 16 inches on center (though other spacing can be used as based on the original worn athletic floor) and connected via channel sections 106 to sleepers 102 remaining from the original floor installation. A lower sheathing layer 115 can be used and may be about ⅜ inch by 4 feet by 8 feet plywood panels aligned parallel to direction of sleepers 102 and set in a staggered brick pattern with ends offset by about 48 inches from ends of panels in adjacent rows. Long edges of panels can form the lower sheathing layer 115 and be aligned as centered over rows of sleepers 102 with each corner centered over top plates 107. An upper sheathing layer 116 can also be used and be aligned diagonally to the lower sheathing layer 115 and set in a staggered brick pattern with ends offset by about 48 inches from ends of panels in adjacent rows. Upper sheathing layer 116 can be attached to lower sheathing layer 115 by applying subfloor staples at about 12 inches on center and can be acceptably attached by other means such as wood screws, adhesive and/or other materials or structures as described previously, to connect these two components. Wood flooring surface 114 can be attached to the completed subfloor 113 by common flooring cleats or staples other means such as wood screws, adhesive and/or other materials or structures as described previously.
In reference to
Turning to
In reference to
My disclosure is also directed to a method to resiliently retrofit the worn athletic floor (
The method can also include the step removing a worn athletic floor portion, e.g., surface 100 and/or subfloor 102, from the supporting sleeper(s) 102 before connecting channel section 106 to supporting sleeper(s) 102. And, in reference to
During use of new athletic floor 10, and as exemplified in
In other aspects the method, in preferred embodiments, is directed to the configuration of certain components. For example, the method can include spacing the resilient pads 111a, 111b from the supporting sleeper 102 on opposite sides of the supporting sleeper (
In reference to
Each and every document cited in this present application, including any cross referenced or related patent or application, is incorporated in this present application in its entirety by this reference, unless expressly excluded or otherwise limited. The citation of any document is not an admission that it is prior art with respect to any embodiment disclosed in this present application or that it alone, or in any combination with any other reference or references, teaches, suggests, or discloses any such embodiment. Further, to the extent that any meaning or definition of a term in this present application conflicts with any meaning or definition of the same term in a document incorporated by reference, the meaning or definition assigned to that term in this present application governs.
The present invention includes the description, examples, embodiments, and drawings disclosed; but it is not limited to such description, examples, embodiments, or drawings. As briefly described above, the reader should assume that features of one disclosed embodiment can also be applied to all other disclosed embodiments, unless expressly indicated to the contrary. Unless expressly indicated to the contrary, the numerical parameters set forth in the present application are approximations that can vary depending on the desired properties sought to be obtained by a person of ordinary skill in the art without undue experimentation using the teachings disclosed in the present application. Modifications and other embodiments will be apparent to a person of ordinary skill in the art of athletic floors, and all such modifications and other embodiments are intended and deemed to be within the scope of the present invention.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/857,792, filed Jun. 5, 2019, and titled: MANOR OF REPLACING WORN ATHLETIC FLOORS.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
498344 | Wiliams | May 1893 | A |
1302578 | Murphy | May 1919 | A |
1587355 | Holger | Jun 1926 | A |
2046593 | Urbain | Jul 1936 | A |
2862255 | Nelson | Dec 1958 | A |
4110948 | Maier, Jr. | Sep 1978 | A |
4170859 | Counihan | Oct 1979 | A |
4221620 | Milne | Sep 1980 | A |
4538392 | Hamar | Sep 1985 | A |
4879857 | Peterson | Nov 1989 | A |
4890434 | Niese | Jan 1990 | A |
5016413 | Counihan | May 1991 | A |
5253464 | Nilsen | Oct 1993 | A |
5277010 | Stephenson | Jan 1994 | A |
5299401 | Shelton | Apr 1994 | A |
5365710 | Randjelovic | Nov 1994 | A |
5369927 | Counihan | Dec 1994 | A |
5412917 | Shelton | May 1995 | A |
5465548 | Niese | Nov 1995 | A |
5497590 | Counihan | Mar 1996 | A |
5647183 | Counihan | Jul 1997 | A |
5682724 | Randjelovic | Nov 1997 | A |
5761867 | Carling | Jun 1998 | A |
5778621 | Randjelovic | Jul 1998 | A |
6032427 | Randjelovic | Mar 2000 | A |
6055785 | Counihan | May 2000 | A |
6122873 | Randjelovic | Sep 2000 | A |
6164031 | Counihan | Dec 2000 | A |
6363675 | Shelton | Apr 2002 | B1 |
7127857 | Randjelovic | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7694480 | Niese | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7703252 | Randjelovic | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7735281 | Randjelovic et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7832165 | Randjelovic | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8307597 | Tucker, Jr. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8464486 | Elliott | Jun 2013 | B1 |
8479468 | Abbasi | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8650824 | DeLong et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8955278 | Mills | Feb 2015 | B1 |
8955279 | Clairmont | Feb 2015 | B1 |
9914011 | Downey et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
10174509 | Hayes et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10676920 | Downey et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
20020092255 | Niese | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020108341 | Hamar | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020178675 | Valentine | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020189184 | Shelton | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20040040242 | Randjelovic | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040098926 | Haytayan | May 2004 | A1 |
20040098927 | Haytayan | May 2004 | A1 |
20050257474 | Randjelovic | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20090139172 | Harinishi | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090145057 | Tsukada | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100205885 | Randjelovic | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100319286 | Becker | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110232217 | Hartl | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120017528 | Liu | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120297713 | Geith | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130008741 | Kim | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130047537 | Dao | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130104479 | Thornton | May 2013 | A1 |
20140311074 | Cormier et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140311075 | Cormier | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150059276 | Valentine | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20160375296 | Downey et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170002572 | Wagner | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170051506 | An | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170114551 | Sennik | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170114552 | Randjelovic | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20180155935 | Gosling | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180202150 | Downey et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20200141131 | Cormier et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
20200340257 | Valentine | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20210115682 | Randjelovic | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210277669 | Gasperich | Sep 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19940837 | Nov 2000 | DE |
Entry |
---|
Aset Services; “ASTM Introduces New Indoor Court Standard: F2772 Athletic Performance of Indoor Sport Systems”; article; published in the United States at least as early as Jun. 2, 2019; 3 pages; United States. |
Aset Services; “EN 14904: Introduction to Performance Types”; educational document; Copyright 2004; 4 pages; United States. |
International Basketball Federation Association; “FIBA Equipment Rules 2020”; article; published in the United States at least as early as Jun. 2, 2019; pp. 17 and 18 (2 pages total); United States. |
Maple Flooring Manufacturers Association; “MFMA PUR Standards: Performance & Uniformity Rating Sport Specific Standards”; educational document; published in the United States at least as early as Jun. 2, 2019; 4 pages; United States. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200386000 A1 | Dec 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62857792 | Jun 2019 | US |