Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
(1) Field of the Invention
The invention relates to an athletic sock having improved abrasion resistance, comfort and moisture management, and being formed from a yarn comprising a combination of cotton, Coolmax® and Lycra® elastane.
(2) Description of Related Art, Including Information Disclosed Under 37 C.F.R. Sections 1.97 and 1.98.
There is a growing interest today in an athletic sock that is durable, comfortable, and easy to manufacture. The durability of a sock can be measured by its abrasion resistance. The comfort of a sock can be evaluated by its ability to manage moisture building up on the wearer's foot during physical activity. The comfort level can be evaluated by the comfort level of the wearer's feet resulting from wearing the sock during physical activity.
In order to overcome the problems resulting from uncomfortable wetness, a sock has been developed having portions or zones comprising different types of fibers. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,341,505 to Dahlgren discloses a moisture management sock with portions or zones constructed predominantly with hydrophobic yarn with rings of hydrophobic yarn and rings of hydrophilic yarn.
Sock durability depends upon the resistance of the sock to wear or abrasion. An athletic sock which can undergo great stress during use requires excellent wear qualities.
Sock comfort is another important objective. Comfort is a product of several factors. An athletic sock should be able to manage moisture resulting from the physical activity of the sock wearer and avoid retention of heat resulting from the moisture formation. The sock should also contact the foot and leg in a manner that avoids any form of abrasion to the skin. The sock should also remain in place when worn, rather than shifting in position.
An object of the invention is an athletic sock with improved abrasion resistance.
Another object of the invention is an athletic sock with improved ability to repel moisture buildup.
A further object of the invention is an athletic sock that has increased comfort.
An additional object of the invention is a sock formed from a single combination of yarn.
The athletic sock of the present invention is knit from a yarn formed by combining filaments of Coolmax®, cotton and Lycra® fibers. Coolmax® is a mark of Invista North America S.A.R.L. of Wilmington, Del., for four-channel polyester fibers that are formed together in cross-sections to allow air to flow through the fabric. Lycra®, also known as spandex or elastane, is also a mark of Invista for a lightweight, stretchy fiber formed from a polyurethane-polyurea copolymer.
The sock has a toe portion, a compression portion, a heel and ankle portion and an upper band at the top portion of the sock. In another embodiment the athletic sock has a second compression portion at the ankle.
In a preferred embodiment, the athletic sock of the invention comprises 35-75% Coolmax® yarn fibers, 15-35% cotton yarn fibers and 10-30% Lycra® yarn fibers. In a particularly preferred embodiment, the athletic sock of the invention comprises 55% Coolmax® yarn fibers, 25% cotton yarn fibers and 20% Lycra® yarn fibers.
Referring to
The sock 10 of
With specific reference to
The sock 10, including its various portions described above, is constructed as a triple knit fabric. One example of such a triple knit fabric is set forth in U.S. Pat. No. 5,033,276, the complete disclosure of which is herein incorporated by reference. An example of a terry knit is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 2,144,563, the complete disclosure of which is herein incorporated by reference, as well.
The bands 15, 23 and 27 extend over the entire circumference of the sock, as shown and are known as compression zones that provide for the wearer of the sock, a level of comfort not present in conventional athletic socks.
The compression zones or bands create space between the inner ply and the foot. The result is that the wearer of the sock of the invention is more comfortable than the wearer of a conventional athletic sock.
The use of a combination of Coolmax®, cotton and Lycra® yarn fibers in the sock results in more efficient wicking of moisture from the athletic sock of the invention than is obtained in a conventional athletic sock formed from other yarn fibers. The athletic sock according to the invention being knit from a combination of Coolmax®, cotton and Lycra® yarn fibers, also has an extraordinary resistance to abrasion that is far superior to socks woven from a combination of two of these yarn fibers.
Referring now to
A terry portion 69 of the sock extends from line 53 to line 68, as shown by the double headed arrow 72 extending between extension lines 73 and 74, with the terry portion 69 likewise being on both sides of the sock 50 and around the heel portion 62, such that a mirror image of the illustration of
The bands 55, 67, likewise function as compression zones, providing the wearer of the sock greater comfort than would be provided to the wearer of a conventional athletic sock.
The compression zones 27, 67 of the socks of the embodiments of
While, as described above, the socks of the embodiments of this invention are comprised of yarn that by weight is of 35%-75% Coolmax (polyester fiber), 15%-35% cotton fiber, and 10%-30% lycra (polyurethane-polyuera copolymer) fiber, in the compression zones 15, 23, 27 and 55, 67, those ranges would be yarn that by weight is of 32%±25% Coolmax fiber, 16%±25% cotton fiber and 52%±25% lycra fiber (elastane), due to the increased elastic present in those particular zones. In a preferred embodiment, in the compression zones 15, 23, 27, 55 and 67 the socks will be comprised of yarn that, by weight, is about 32% Coolmax fiber, about 16% cotton fiber and about 52% lycra fiber. The remainder of the non-band portions of the sock is comprised of 35%-75% polyester fiber, 15%-35% cotton fiber and 10%-30% polyurethane-polyurea copolymer fiber. In a preferred embodiment the remainder of the sock consists essentially of about 55% polyester fiber, about 25% cotton fiber, and about 20% polyurethane-polyurea copolymer fiber. In a particularly preferred embodiment, the remainder of the sock is consists of about 55% polyester fiber, about 25% cotton fiber, and about 20% polyurethane-polyurea copolymer fiber.
The abrasion resistance, comfort and moisture management advantages of the athletic socks of the invention are particularly advantageous for wearers of the socks for an extended period of time. Such wearers include athletes in professional events or events of long duration such as golf. Other wearers would include persons who otherwise participate in athletic events including officials such as baseball umpires and referees of other sports.
Reference is also made to the following U.S. patent documents, the complete disclosures of which are herein incorporated by reference:
Having generally described this invention, a further understanding can be obtained by reference to certain specific examples which are provided herein for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to be limiting unless otherwise specified
Comparative Test of Abrasion Resistance
The abrasion resistance study characterizes a sock made according to the invention and a comparative sock. The sock made according to the invention was knitted from a yarn comprising 55% CoolMax®, 25% cotton, and 20% Lycra® (elastane) fibers. The comparative sock was knitted from a yarn consisting of cotton and Lycra® (elastane) fibers.
A Martindale abrasion tester, described in ASTM-4966-98 and in U.S. Pat. No. 6,435,221, the complete disclosure of which is herein incorporated by reference, was used. A circular disc of fabric from the sock made according to the invention was mounted on the side of the sample holder and the front side of the inventive fabric (the surface on the fabric from the outer side of the sock) was rubbed with the referenced wool fabric under a load of 12 kPa. After being rubbed 150,000 times, the fabric was intact.
A circular disc of fabric taken from the comparative sock underwent the same abrasion resistance test described directly above. The disc broke down after being rubbed less than 100,000 times.
These results demonstrate the unexpectedly superior abrasion resistance of socks comprising the three fiber composition of the invention relating to socks made from fibers containing two of the three fibers of the invention.
Comparative Test of Sock Comfort
A pair of socks according to the invention made from yarn comprising 55% CoolMax®, 25% cotton, and 20% Lycra® (elastane) fibers and a pair of socks of the same size and appearance knit from yarn comprising fibers of cotton and Lycra® (elastane) are each worn for 15 minutes by 13 test subjects.
The socks were not identified to the wearers as socks made or not made according to the invention to ensure that the test is a blind test. Instead the sock should be marked as Sock A and Sock B.
After wearing one of the pairs of socks, the wearer is asked to evaluate the comfort of the socks and each portion of the sock on a scale of 1 (uncomfortable) to 5 (extremely comfortable).
Sock A represents the sock knit from the composition of yarn made according to the invention. (55% CoolMax®, 25% cotton, and 20% Lycra® (elastane) fibers). Sock B was knit from a combination of cotton and Lycra® yarns.
The results of the evaluations by 13 test subjects, identified by initials, are set forth in the chart marked as Table 1.
The evaluations of the 13 wearers of socks A and B demonstrate that the comfort of Sock A (made according to the invention) is greater in the whole sock and in each portion of the sock. Hence, the comfort of the sock made according to the invention is unexpectedly and substantially superior to socks made from compositions of yarn relatively similar to the inventive composition.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
709734 | Bellis | Sep 1902 | A |
1018134 | Scott | Feb 1912 | A |
1434941 | Boyd | Nov 1922 | A |
2144563 | Davis | Jan 1939 | A |
2746054 | Heilbronner | May 1956 | A |
3107510 | Manger | Oct 1963 | A |
3113570 | Holliday et al. | Dec 1963 | A |
3250095 | Bird | May 1966 | A |
3259915 | Dison | Jul 1966 | A |
3307379 | Woolley et al. | Mar 1967 | A |
3510882 | White | May 1970 | A |
3796067 | East | Mar 1974 | A |
4047400 | Thorneburg | Sep 1977 | A |
4079602 | Blore | Mar 1978 | A |
4229954 | Blore | Oct 1980 | A |
4267710 | Imamichi | May 1981 | A |
4341096 | Safrit et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4571960 | Hursh et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4615188 | Hursh et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4898007 | Dahlgren | Feb 1990 | A |
5033276 | Strauss et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5095548 | Chesebro, Jr. | Mar 1992 | A |
5353524 | Brier | Oct 1994 | A |
5511323 | Dahlgren | Apr 1996 | A |
5687587 | Michel | Nov 1997 | A |
5708985 | Ogden | Jan 1998 | A |
5724836 | Green | Mar 1998 | A |
6082146 | Dahlgren | Jul 2000 | A |
6341505 | Dahlgren | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6435221 | Waldrop et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6612136 | Roe | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6708348 | Romay | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6723428 | Foss et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6777356 | Sadato et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6986270 | Miller, III et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7069600 | Romay | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7213420 | Lynch et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7552483 | Turner | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7552603 | Dahlgren | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7565920 | Li et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7614257 | Araki et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
20060010574 | Linnane et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060286376 | Haigh et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20080041113 | Mori et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080249454 | Mills | Oct 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120102625 A1 | May 2012 | US |