Not Applicable.
The present embodiments relate to athletics and are more particularly directed to a system, method, and apparatus for training a user to swing a member at a moving target, preferably in the context of swinging a ball bat (e.g., baseball or softball).
The field of training baseball and softball players typically strives to develop their ability to swing a bat effectively and to get quality hits more consistently through meaningful practice repetitions. For many players, this is achieved through traditional “batting practice,” wherein over numerous repetitions the batter attempts to strike with his bat an appropriate ball (i.e., either baseball or softball) that is either manually or mechanically projected toward an area adjacent the batter. The practice may be with or without the assistance from one or more persons observing the batter and then attempting to provide guidance to the batter on how to improve his swing. The batter of course is also able to make his own adjustments based on his own observations. Batting practice of this sort, however, involves practical challenges that may in some instances provide drawbacks in accomplishing the practice. Such drawbacks include providing space requirements for facilitating the flight of hit balls, which generally require use of an actual fenced baseball/softball field, an enclosed batting cage, or a fairly large, unpopulated area. Other drawbacks of this technique include: (i) the time and energy required in retrieving balls which, once hit, tend to travel long distances and in myriad directions; and (ii) the ability of non-professional pitchers to effectively deliver proper pitches, that is, to throw balls into the hitting zone consistently for the purpose of efficient and meaningful batting practice. Note that this latter concern is sometimes addressed through the use of an electromechanical pitching device, which while improving accuracy also greatly increases the cost of the system and is also subject to maintenance and repair requirements.
In addition to batting practice, the field of training baseball and softball players also has included numerous swing training systems and devices, some more recent and some that have been around for many years, as further detailed below.
A first known example of a batting practice system and method includes a tethered ball that is affixed to a rope which is connected to a fixed point. This system provides a repeating swing target for batters as they strike the ball and then wait as the tether uncoils and sends the ball back into the hitting zone. This system, however, has various drawbacks, including: (i) it does not require the hitter to track a pitch-like arc of the target/ball; and (ii) it does not give the hitter multi-dimensional swing feedback once the target/ball is struck.
A second known example of a batting practice system and method includes a ball on a zip line, where the ball has a hole in diametrically opposed positions on its surface and through which a pair of static-line ropes pass. An operator of the device pulls the two rope lengths apart, thereby causing the ball to advance along the rope and if properly positioned to advance to a hitting zone adjacent a batter. This system provides a repeatable target for a batter, does not require batted balls to be collected once hit, and gives a batter a roughly pitch-like target/ball to track. This system, however, has various drawbacks, including: (i) the flight of the target/ball is not affected by gravity but is instead shuttled along the rope lengths in an unnatural manner; (ii) it does not give the batter multi-dimensional swing feedback once the ball is struck; and (iii) it does not give the batter the ability to swing freely through the entire hitting zone, as the necessary rope lengths run through the middle of the hitting zone and thus can force the bat into contact with the flight of the ball along the static line or alternatively may cause the batter to contact the rope in lieu of the ball.
A third known example of a batting practice system and method is a so-called “hitting stick.” This apparatus includes as the batting target a molded target/ball affixed to one end of a long flexible (e.g., rubberized) member, and a batter practicing with the device is assisted by a person that holds a distant end of the member and physically leads the target/ball on the member's opposite end into the hitting zone for the batter to hit. This product sometimes is affixed to a mechanized stand that replaces the assisting operator. This system provides a repeatable target for a batter and does not require the batted “ball” to be collected as the ball remains permanently affixed to the stick member. This system, however, has various drawbacks, including: (i) it does not require the batter to track a pitch-like arc of the target/ball; (ii) it does not give the hitter multi-dimensional swing feedback once the target/ball is struck; and (iii) in the case of the hand held version the blow to the stick causes a shock to the person holding the distant end and there is also potential danger involved should that person release the end of the stick while the ball is struck.
A fourth known example of a batting practice system and method includes a combination of practice balls and a simplified or “micro” bat. In this system, the practice balls are typically light-weight (e.g., generally plastic) balls of various materials and sizes, introduced into the hitting zone by either a toss from a “pitcher” or via an automated device (i.e., a pitching machine). The system often employs a thin bat or stick to force the batter to focus more intently on making contact with the projected ball. This system gives the batter repeatable practice at tracking the target/ball into the hitting zone on a (somewhat) pitch-like arc and also provides limited multi-dimensional feedback as to the effectiveness of each individual swing result. One drawback, however, is the weight of the ball; as the weight of the practice ball approaches that of an actual regulation baseball or softball, the space requirements will approach that of an actual live batting practice and thus provide no simulation benefit. Therefore, target/balls must be kept light (generally hollow plastic). As such; their flight is restricted such that they can be hit in a reasonably small space without concern over damage to property or injury to “pitcher”, but the trajectory commensurate with this reduced weight does not produce an overly realistic pitch-like arc. In addition, in such a system the simplified bat does not necessarily approximate the realistic length, weight, or feel of a regulation bat.
In all events, swing training systems, methods, and apparatus are useful to the extent that they can accurately simulate live batting practice conditions for a batter's practice. Further, while the preceding approaches have useful application, the present inventor has observed that they may be improved upon by addressing some or all of the above-stated drawbacks. Such improvements are borne out in the preferred embodiments, as discussed below.
In a preferred embodiment, there is a method for training a user to swing a member at a moving target. The method comprises receiving in an area proximate the member a target object projected along a free space path toward the area. The method also comprises striking, by the user, the target object with the member. In the method, the target object comprises a target member having a majority of its length along the free space path.
Other aspects are also disclosed and claimed.
a illustrates a first preferred embodiment example of a target object.
b illustrates a second preferred embodiment example of a target object.
c illustrates a third preferred embodiment example of a target object.
d illustrates a fourth preferred embodiment example of a target object.
By way of introduction to the preferred embodiments, the following terms are defined.
The present inventor has discovered a manner of achieving numerous advantages in the challenge of training baseball and softball players to develop their ability to swing a bat effectively and to get quality hits more consistently through meaningful practice repetitions by developing the use of a Target Object that is other than the traditional spherical baseball or softball. Specifically, in the preferred embodiments, and as shown diagrammatically in a top down view in
a and 2b illustrate alternative preferred embodiment examples of the Target Object, shown respectively as TO1 and TO2. Each Target Object TOx includes a main body member (MB) and an additional shaped member (ASM) attached to the main body member (MB). In either alternative, the preferred method of projecting the Target Object (TO) toward the Hitting Zone (HZ) is such the Target Object (TO) is launched so that it travels in the air with the additional shaped member (ASM) proceeding first. In this manner, therefore, the additional shaped member may be of various shapes and may assist the Target Object (TO) to pass in the Pitch-Like Arc toward the Hitting Zone (HZ). Indeed, in either alternative preferred embodiment of
c and 2d illustrate additional alternative preferred embodiment examples of the Target Object, shown respectively as TO3 and TO4 and in certain respects comparable to target objects TO1 and TO2, respectively. As shown in
Various attributes of the Target Object (TO) are selected so as to assist it to travel through the air as just described. For example, the material of the Target Object (TO) is preferably such that if it is hit directly back at the person that launched the Object and strikes him, it will do no harm and generally due to its shape and other attributes will travel less than 25 feet when struck by a bat. In a preferred embodiment, therefore, the Target Object (TO) includes at least a portion constructed of a foam material. Thus, the length of the Target Object (TO) may be included as a portion of a foam dart. The Target Object (TO) as a foam dart therefore includes a length that is longer in the direction of the Pitch-Like Arc than in any other dimension, such as may be achieved by a tubular or cylindrical body, with either a hollow or solid interior or some other type of body or shaft that has a majority of its length extending along its flight path (i.e., in the direction of the Pitch-Like Arc). As another aspect, the preferred weight of the Target Object (TO), with or without an additional shaped member on one end, is less than an actual baseball, which weighs in the range of 5.0 to 5.25 ounces; indeed, a preferable Target Object (TO) weighs less than one or two ounces. In this manner, the Target Object (TO) requires less force to project from the Launching Mechanism (LM) (further described below) to the Hitting Zone (HZ), and the Target Object (TO) if successfully struck by the bat of a Batter (B) will travel a lesser distance than an actual baseball or softball. As still another aspect, the length of the Target Object (TO) shaft is preferably at least 2.5 inches. The additional shaped member (ASM) (e.g., as shown earlier or that also could be a rubber tip) is preferably 0.5 inches in length and weighs approximately 0.20 to 0.25 ounces, and preferably outweighs the remaining main body member (MB) of the Target Object (TO) (e.g., its cylindrical or other length body). Indeed, increasing the weight of the Target Object (TO) tip and the length of its shaft increases the speed of the Target Object (TO) in its flight toward the Hitting Zone (HZ), and therefore different values may be selected based on a desired speed. Moreover, in one preferred embodiment a kit is provided in which a plurality of different Target Objects are included, where certain of those Target Objects have different sizes/weights/flight attributes than others in the same kit; in this manner, a user may select a different Target Object (TO) among the variations to achieve a different speed or manner of travel of the Target Object (TO) as compared to the others when the Target Object (TO) is projected to the Hitting Zone (HZ); in other words, the user thereby may use different ones of the Target Objects to simulate or types of different speed “pitches” for batting practice. Also in this regard, therefore, other attributes of the plurality of Target Objects may be varied within the kit so the user can obtain other changes in flight path of the Target Object (TO), where for example different Target Objects simulate different types of pitches (e.g., curve, slider, cutter, sinker, splitter). One skilled in the art may readily ascertain various manners to cause the Target Object (TO) to fly in a path that slightly departs from the linear Path (Pth) shown in
Alternative shaped members may be included as part of the Target Object (TO) in lieu of the shape described above. Some examples of such members may be ascertained by one skilled in the art given the teachings of this document. Moreover, either the additional shaped member (ASM) or the length of the Target Object (TO) may include a color or pattern so that the batter can be challenged to identify that color or pattern on any given swing. This provides additional training feedback as to how effectively the Batter (B) is tracking the Target Object (TO) into the Hitting Zone (HZ) based on how accurately he can identify the correct color following a given swing, thereby training the Batter (B) to watch the Target Object (TO) intently all the way into the Hitting Zone (HZ) and translating into a comparable amount of focus and concentration when the Batter (B) is faced with an actual baseball or softball. Thus, a batter's ability to consistently track the Target Object (TO) completely through the Hitting Zone (HZ) and on to the bat at contact will generally insure improved hitting results with an actual baseball or softball.
Various preferred embodiments also include the Launching Mechanism (LM) for accurately projecting the Target Object (TO) toward the Hitting Zone (HZ). Thus, as with an actual live pitch of a baseball or softball, a batter when using a preferred embodiment must track the flight of the Target Object (TO) as it travels from the Pitcher (P), at the source location of the Launching Mechanism (LM), toward and into the Hitting Zone (HZ). Moreover, during this time the Batter (B) must time his swing accurately and swing the bat effectively to hit and drive the Target Object (TO). In this regard, the preferred embodiment mechanism may be formed in various fashions so as to accommodate the attributes of the preferred Target Object (TO) in order to project it along a Pitch-Like Arc toward the Hitting Zone (HZ). In a preferred embodiment, therefore, the distance of trajectory from the Launching Mechanism (LM) to the Hitting Zone (HZ) is up to 20 to 30 feet and therefore the Launching Mechanism (LM) includes sufficient apparatus to project the Target Object (TO) that distance. Additionally in a preferred embodiment, the launching apparatus is constructed with a goal of launching each Target Object (TO) at a relatively consistent trajectory and speed. Toward these ends, in one preferred embodiment, the Launching Mechanism (LM) may be hand-held and manually operated, and in this regard may be readily achieved using a device selected from or akin to various commercially available foam dart guns.
In other preferred embodiments, the Launching Mechanism (LM) may include various modifications. As a first example, the Launching Mechanism (LM) may include a stand and/or additional apparatus so as to fix the mechanism relative to the ground (or other structure) as well as its launching direction to thereby increase the likelihood that each respective launch of a Target Object (TO) is along a similar or virtually the same path as the previous launch. As a second example, the Launching Mechanism (LM) may include adjustable apparatus so that adjustments may be made after one or more launched Target Objects in order to aim the next or successive Target Objects to particular spots in the Hitting Zone (HZ). As yet another example, the Launching Mechanism (LM) and/or the Target Object (TO) may include features to vary the speed or manner of flight of a given Target Object (TO) to differ from that of another Target Object (TO). As still another example, the Launching Mechanism (LM) may include a chamber for housing multiple Target Objects (TO) and/or a chamber that may be loaded with multiple Target Objects so that each such Target Object (TO) in the chamber may be individually launched by the Launching Mechanism (LM) before there is a need to re-load the Launching Mechanism (LM). As a final example, the Launching Mechanism (LM) may include a remote control or automated launch feature, whereby the Batter (B) may set up the Launching Mechanism (LM) and then conduct batting practice by himself without requiring an additional person to manually operate the Launching Mechanism (LM) for each launched Target Object (TO). In all events, in a preferred embodiment the Target Object (TO) and/or Launching Mechanism (LM) are such that the Target Object (TO) travels somewhere around 20 to 30 mph (e.g., 25 mph) in the range of 25 to 30 feet from the location of the Batter (B). These attributes produce a realistic “pitch” pace, generating an effective reaction time for the Batter (B), particularly at the typical age range of a developing or learning batter. Thus, the Batter (B) must see the “pitch” (i.e., oncoming Target Object (TO)), determine if the path of the Object will provide a ball or strike, and commit to the swing in a usefully realistic timeline. The Pitcher (P) can slow the pace by increasing the distance to the Batter (B) and adjusting the arc of the projection, or conversely move closer to the Batter (B) to increase challenge to more developed hitters or by adjusting one or more of the adjustable features described above. In all events, therefore, the Launching Mechanism (LM) includes a desirable projectile function that is consistent with the materials and form factor of the Target Object (TO), which may include therefore a mechanical and/or electrical apparatus, including but not limited to a spring loading or air compressing launching apparatus. Moreover, the form factor of the Launching Mechanism (LM) itself may be altered as within the present inventive scope.
Given the above, a preferred embodiment includes a training system kit for teaching an athlete to swing a bat or other member at a free traveling Target Object (TO). The kit preferably includes one or more Target Objects along with a Launching Mechanism (LM) for the Target Objects to be projected to a Hitting Zone (HZ) proximate the athlete. The kit may further include the bat or the athlete may obtain that elsewhere. Further, the kit may include instructions and or accompanying electronic media to illustrate the use of other components in the kit as well as to illustrate tips and techniques for an educator (e.g., coach) that is using the kit components to teach batting or the like. Thus, such a coach may work with a batter whereby the coach operates the Launching Mechanism (LM), consistent with the above principles, to provide a batting practice that in many respects simulates an actual real batting practice that is traditionally achieved as described earlier, yet with the numerous benefits of the preferred embodiment as detailed in this document.
From the preceding, one skilled in the art will appreciate that the preferred embodiments provide numerous benefits and certain advantages over prior systems, methods, and apparatus for training a batter or the like. For example, relatively minimal space is required to use the system and methodology, just a distance of 30′ or less and enough space to swing a bat. As another example, the Target Object (TO) when struck provides immediate meaningful feedback as to relative success of individual swings (or lack thereof) based on real time flight response of each struck Target Object (TO), while at the same time there is relative ease, greatly reduced energy, and reduced time expended in recovering each Target Object (TO) and a considerably reduced danger from the flight of each Target Object as compared to a traditional ball. As another example, the preferred embodiments deliver the Target Object (TO) into the Hitting Zone (HZ) accurately with relative ease as compared with consistently delivering an actual pitched ball into a strike zone. As another example, a favorably shaped and weighted Target Object (TO) of an appropriate material requires realistic timing (the requisite learned rhythm for hitting a moving object with a bat), focus on hand/eye coordination, and a pitch-like arc that effectively simulates the arc of an actual pitched ball. Moreover, the preferred embodiments provide safety for a batter as compared to manually pitching and/or receiving hard balls that carry an increase risk of striking and potentially injuring a batter). With the increase in safety, there is also less risk in varying the projectile path in the Hitting Zone (HZ) and therefore increasing the variability with each “pitch,” thereby challenging the batter to track variable incoming “pitches” of the Target Object and allowing the batter to comfortably increase a sense of discernment between “pitches” that are in the Hitting Zone (HZ) (desirable ‘strikes” at which to swing) and those that are not in the Hitting Zone (HZ) (undesirable “balls” which should not be swung at). As yet another example, the preferred embodiments allow a batter to use an actual game bat while posing no risk of damage or wear to the bat during practice (e.g. discoloration, deadening of barrel, etc), which is increasingly more important given the greater complexity and cost of contemporary bats. Still further, the preferred embodiments enable a larger number of repetitions in a highly concentrated timeframe as compared to various prior art approaches and can be used either indoors or outdoors. Moreover, one skilled in the art may readily construct various apparatus consistent with the teaching herein according to readily ascertainable technologies. Lastly, while the present embodiments have been described in detail, various substitutions, modifications or alterations could be made to the descriptions set forth above without departing from the present inventive scope.
This application claims priority, and the benefit of the filing date, under 35 U.S.C. §119 of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/247,874, filed Oct. 1, 2009, and which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
302094 | Briggs | Jul 1884 | A |
2193645 | Raizen et al. | Mar 1940 | A |
2354790 | Beck | Aug 1944 | A |
2611999 | Mikolay | Sep 1952 | A |
3264777 | McCreary, Jr. | Aug 1966 | A |
3393911 | Lawson | Jul 1968 | A |
3437340 | Grise | Apr 1969 | A |
3507494 | Finkel | Apr 1970 | A |
3528659 | Benham | Sep 1970 | A |
3691674 | Thompson | Sep 1972 | A |
3784199 | Chmela | Jan 1974 | A |
3897057 | Pennington | Jul 1975 | A |
4021041 | Goldfarb et al. | May 1977 | A |
4101128 | Yellen | Jul 1978 | A |
4257613 | Meyer Thor Straten | Mar 1981 | A |
4826179 | Callaghan | May 1989 | A |
4930777 | Holenstein | Jun 1990 | A |
4997190 | Chmela | Mar 1991 | A |
5016891 | Nelson | May 1991 | A |
5066017 | Kurland | Nov 1991 | A |
5067728 | Dadbeh | Nov 1991 | A |
5211612 | Carbonero | May 1993 | A |
5230650 | Brayton | Jul 1993 | A |
5267735 | Bushman | Dec 1993 | A |
5290041 | Kettelson | Mar 1994 | A |
5362066 | Sassak | Nov 1994 | A |
D361811 | Grimm et al. | Aug 1995 | S |
5494278 | Linden | Feb 1996 | A |
5779576 | Smith et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5860879 | Gable | Jan 1999 | A |
6010419 | Rappaport et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6068260 | Dean | May 2000 | A |
6083127 | O'Shea | Jul 2000 | A |
6227991 | Carlton et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6514161 | Minniear | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6612942 | Battersby et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6669587 | Kessler | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6682448 | Jamison | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6733405 | Gormley | May 2004 | B2 |
6752138 | Taryoto | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6926579 | Rappaport | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6976926 | LaPointe | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7288037 | Myers | Oct 2007 | B2 |
D562411 | Jones et al. | Feb 2008 | S |
8220392 | Maldonado et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
20020032087 | Jamison | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020164921 | Wilkinson et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20060135291 | Biegen | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060223658 | Blanco | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060276277 | Montefusco | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20080020873 | Miller et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20090011870 | Neal et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20100255939 | York | Oct 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1778441 | May 2006 | CN |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61247874 | Oct 2009 | US |