The present invention relates to fire suppression nozzles in a fire suppression system, and more particularly to an atomizing nozzle for a clean agent fire suppression system.
A “clean agent” system is one of a variety of commercially available fire suppression systems. The term “clean agent” denotes a system that utilizes suppressants which do not leave any residue in the fire zone after discharge. This type of system is ideal for sensitive electronics and/or documents. A typical clean agent system operates by pumping a gas suppressant (such as an inert gas) or a liquid/liquefied gas suppressant agent into the fire zone to inhibit the combustion process of a fire. The gas suppressant suppresses the fire by lowering the level of oxygen in the atmosphere of the fire zone. The reduction in oxygen inhibits combustion and starves the fire. Alternatively, or in addition to starving the fire, the liquid or the vaporizing liquefied-gas suppressant agent may chemically inhibit the combustion process.
Many types of clean agent systems using a variety of suppressants are commercially available. In one particular system, a suppressant agent is liquefied when stored under pressure in a container but is vaporized when released from the container. The suppressant agent is forced from the storage container by an inert gas propellant. The liquefied agent and propellant may form a two phase mixture (gas propellant, gaseous chemical agent, plus liquid chemical agent) in the pipe network of the fire suppression system. This mixture flows through the pipe network until it is discharged through an array of dual fluid nozzles into the fire zone. After discharge into the fire zone, the remainder of the liquefied suppressant agent is vaporized leaving no residue upon evaporation. The vaporized suppressant agent inhibits combustion by carrying heat away from the fire and breaking down the chemical structure of the fire.
In another clean agent system, a liquid suppressant (for example water) or a liquefied-gas suppressant agent is utilized. The liquid or liquefied gas agent is forced through the pipe network of the fire suppression system by a propellant. The propellant and suppressant agent mixture is further combined with additional quantities of a gas (for example an inert gas or Argonite™) in the pipe network of the fire suppression system to provide for total flooding of the fire zone. The mixture of liquid or liquefied gas suppressant, propellant, and gas flows through the pipe network until it is discharged through an array of dual flow nozzles into the fire zone. The suppressant and gas inhibit combustion by absorbing heat and by reducing the amount of oxygen in the atmosphere of the fire zone.
Dual fluid nozzles for clean agent systems such as the nozzle disclosed in United States Patent Application 2005/0001065A1 to Senecal have an internal choke point at or adjacent the nozzle's inlet. Choking the fluid flow internally can allow small droplets formed by the turbulence induced at the choke point to be dissipated when the fluid reforms into a flow sheet prior to discharge from the nozzle. As a result of the reformation of the fluid flow into the flow sheet prior to discharge, the liquid or liquefied suppressant droplets produced by the nozzle have sizes greater than about 20 micrometers (0.79 mils) in diameter upon discharge from the nozzle's outlet. These droplets do not precisely follow the typical conical or radial discharge flow path of the gas suppressant or propellant from the conventional nozzles due to their large momentum. Thus, some of the droplets tend to splash on and adhere to surfaces, such as the walls or the ceiling of the fire zone. Additionally, physical obstacles (such as partitions, desks, tables, or baffles) in the fire zone may obstruct the flow of the droplets, as the droplets may not be able to follow the path of the gas flow around these obstacles. The inability of some of the droplets to flow around obstacles may reduce or eliminate the ability of the fire suppression system to totally flood the fire zone. The result of the wet mist droplets' adherence to surfaces (and the droplets' reduced ability to circulate around obstacles) is that more suppressant agent is required for effective fire suppression, increasing the cost of the clean agent system.
A nozzle for a fire suppression system has a bonnet and a deflector base. An inlet port extends through the bonnet along the axis of symmetry of the bonnet. The inlet port receives an outlet end of a fire suppression delivery pipe to mount the bonnet to the pipe. The bonnet has a frustoconical surface which extends radially outward and downward from the inlet port. The deflector base is secured to and co-axially aligned with the bonnet at a predetermined distance to create a flow passageway therebetween. The flow passageway imparts a down angle to a suppressant flow discharging from the nozzle to better disperse the suppressant within the fire zone. A discharge port at the circumferential edge of the bonnet and deflector base constricts the suppressant flow to atomize the droplets of liquid suppressant discharged into the fire zone.
The storage tanks 16 include a fire suppressant tank 22 and a propellant tank 24. The suppressant tank 22 contains a fire suppressant agent 26, and includes a propellant connecting pipe or hose 28, a fire suppressant agent vapor zone 30, a siphon tube 32, and an outlet port 33. The siphon tube 32 further includes an inlet port 34. The propellant tank 24 includes a propellant gas zone 36 and contains a propellant 38. The propellant connecting pipe 28 further includes a check valve 40, a restriction 42, and an outlet valve 44.
The pipe network 18 includes an input section 46 and an output section 48. The input section 46 includes a valve 50 and a controller 52. The output section 48 includes outlet pipes 54 and outlet ports 56.
In
The liquefied-gas suppressant 26 is generally housed at a gage pressure of between about 0 psi and about 100 psi (about 0 MPa to about 0.69 MPa), when a temperature of about 77° F. (25° C.) is maintained. In one embodiment, the fire suppression system 10 uses 1,1,1,2,3,3,3-heptafluoropropane (CF3CHFCF3), also known as “HFC-227ea,” as the fire suppressant 26. HFC-227ea has a boiling point below that of a typical room temperature (77° F. or 25° C.), such that it normally assumes a gaseous state at room temperature. This allows HFC-227ea to inhibit combustion by carrying heat away from the fire and breaking down the chemical structure of the fire. In other embodiments, the liquefied-gas suppressant 26 may include: Novec™ 1230 (CF3CF2C(O)CF(CF3)2), trifluoromethane, trifluoroiodomethane, hydrofluourocarbons, perfluorocarbons, hydroclorofluorocarbons, or any other suitable liquefied-gas that acts as a fire suppressant.
The propellant connecting pipe or hose 28 connects the propellant tank 24 to the fire suppressant tank 22. This interconnection may occur in the fire suppressant agent vapor zone 30 in the upper portion of the fire suppressant tank 22. This interconnection arrangement allows a propellant force to be exerted on the liquefied-gas suppressant 26, to drive the liquefied suppressant 26 up through the siphon tube 32 in the fire suppressant tank 22 and out through the outlet port 33 to the pipe network 18. More specifically, the liquefied suppressant 26 enters the siphon tube 32 through the inlet port 34, which is disposed adjacent the bottom of the fire suppressant tank 22. The disposition of the inlet port 34 in the liquefied portion of the fire suppressant 26 allows the fire suppressant 26 to be pushed into the pipe network 18 in compressed liquefied form. In another embodiment, the siphon tube 32 is eliminated and the outlet port 33 of the fire suppressant tank 22 is disposed at or near the bottom of the tank 22. This allows the fire suppressant 26 to be pushed into the pipe network 18 in compressed liquid form.
The propellant connecting pipe 28 also connects to the vapor gas zone 36 at the top portion of the propellant tank 24. The liquid propellant 38 in the lower portion of the propellant tank 24 may be a non-condensable gas, such as nitrogen, argon, Argonite™ (a mixture of 50 percent by weight argon and 50 percent by weight nitrogen), or another suitable gas, which has a lower boiling point than the fire suppressant 26. Alternatively, the propellant 38 may be a liquefied compressed gas, such as carbon dioxide or another suitable gas, which also has a lower boiling point than the fire suppressant 26. This lower boiling point provides a large gas pressure for propelling the fire suppressant 26 through the siphon tube 32 and the pipe network 18. The gas propellant 38 is selected because of its non-combustible properties and its low boiling point.
In
The rate of flow of propellant 38 through the connecting pipe 28 may be limited by the restriction 42 upstream of the check valve 40. In one embodiment, the restriction 42 is located at the inlet of the check valve 40. The cross sectional area of the restriction 42 provides the fire suppressant tank 22 with a specified flow rate of gas propellant 38. The specified flow rate of the gas propellant 38 results in a specific predetermined pressure being exerted on the fire suppressant 26. As a result of the specific pressure of the propellant 38, a specific flow rate and pressure is achieved as the fire suppressant 26 (or mixture of suppressant 26 and propellant 38) flows through the pipe network 18. The size and location of the restriction 42 may vary and is selected depending on the requirements of the fire suppression system 10.
The outlet valve 44 is disposed further upstream from the restriction 42. The outlet valve 44 may be located on the connecting pipe 28 or the propellant tank 24, and is capable of an “on” or “off” setting. In one embodiment, when the fire suppression system 10 is not in use, the outlet valve 44 is set to the off position. In the off position, the outlet valve 44 is closed, such that there is no mixing of the gas propellant 38 with the fire suppressant 26. In another embodiment, when the outlet valve 44 is set to the off position the outlet valve is only partially closed. This allows some gas propellant 38 to enter the propellant tank 24 and mix with, and dissolve in the fire suppressant 26 if so required. The gas propellant 38 thereby maintains a pressure load on the fire suppressant 26. The outlet valve 44 may be provided with a sensor or a control which switches or activates the outlet valve 44 to the “on” setting when a fire is detected in the fire zone 14. In the “on” setting, the outlet valve 44 is fully opened and the propellant 38 flows through the connecting pipe 28.
In
In another embodiment, the system 10 may be configured to allow the gas propellant 38 to mix with and dissolve in the liquefied-gas fire suppressant 26. Thus, a two phase liquid is pushed through the pipe network 18. The nozzles 20 are capable of atomizing the flow resulting from either embodiment.
The valve 50 is disposed in the input section 46 downstream of the suppressant tank 22. The valve 50 arrests the flow from the suppressant tank 22 when the valve is in an “off” position. When a fire is detected in the fire zone 14, the valve 50 is opened by the controller 52. The controller 52 may be either manually or automatically activated. The valve 50 may be linked to the outlet valve 44 such that both valves are simultaneously activated by the controller 52. Alternatively, outlet valve 44 may be opened before valve 50 such that the pressure buildup upstream of valve 50 opens the valve 50.
After the valve 50 is opened, the suppressant 26 (or the mixture of suppressant 26 and propellant 38) flows through the remainder of the input section 46 and the output section 48 to the nozzles 20. More specifically, the output section 48 of the pipe network 18 passes through the wall, ceiling or floor 12 to enter and extend throughout the fire zone 14. The output section 48 may extend through multiple structures 12 (such as walls, ceilings, or floors) in the case of a multi-story fire zone 14. Multiple outlet pipes 54 having threaded pipe end 56 sections diverge from the output section 48 into different parts of the fire zone 14. The nozzles 20 are adapted to secure to the outlet ports 56. The suppressant 26 or the mixture of suppressant 26 and propellant 38 flows through the pipe end 56 into the nozzle 20 where it is atomized and sprayed into the fire zone 14.
The tanks 58 include multiple cylinders interconnected in fluid series. The number and size of the tanks 58 may be varied depending on the system 10 requirements. In one embodiment, model number 90-102300-001 from Kidde Fire Systems (having a fill capacity of 12.4 MPa at 21 degrees Celsius) is used in the fire suppression system 10. The tanks 58 interconnect in the vapor gas zones 60 toward the top portion of each tank 58.
The suppressant 62 in the tanks 58 may be a non-condensable gas, such as nitrogen, argon, Argonite™, or another suitable gas such as another inert gas. Alternatively, the suppressant 62 may be a liquefied compressed gas, such as carbon dioxide or another suitable gas. The gas suppressant 62 reduces the concentration of oxygen in the fire zone 14.
The flow of suppressant 62 through the second input section 61 is regulated by the outlet valve 66, which may be located on the input section 61 of the pipe network 18 or the tanks 58 themselves. The outlet valve 66 is capable of an “on” or “off” setting. When the fire suppression system 10 is not being utilized, the outlet valve 66 is set to the “off” position. In the off position, the outlet valve 66 is closed such that no suppressant 62 enters the fire zone 14. The outlet valve 66 may be provided with a sensor or a control which switches or activates the outlet valve 66 to the “on” setting when a fire is detected in the fire zone 14. In the “on” setting, the outlet valve 66 is fully opened and suppressant 62 flows through the input section 61.
In addition to the fire suppressant agents 26 discussed in the system 10 shown in
The nozzle 20 may be constructed from any suitable metallic, polymeric, ceramic or composite material. In
The bonnet 70 receives the threaded pipe end 56 of the outlet pipes 54 (
The small distance the deflector base 70 is spaced off the bonnet 76 (coupled with the different down angles of the lands 77A and channels 78A of the deflector base 70 with respect to the down angles of the lands 77B and channels 78B of the bonnet 76 in some embodiments) creates a small discharge port 82 along the circumferential outer edge of the deflector base 70 and bonnet 76. More specifically, the discharge port 82 is defined by the distance between the top surface of the deflector base 70 and the bottom surface of the bonnet 76 at the edge of each of those components. The desired discharge port 82 area (and hence height) will vary with fire suppression system operating conditions and can be approximated by the equation:
where: {dot over (m)}max is the maximum mass flow rate of the gas; A is the minimum cross-sectional flow area where the flow is choked; k is the specific heat ratio; R is the universal gas constant; P0 is the stagnation pressure; T0 is the stagnation temperature.
In one embodiment, the distance between the deflector base 70 and bonnet 76 at the discharge port 82 is between about 100 micrometers to about 200 micrometers (about 4/1000 inch to about 8/1000 inch).
Thus, the disposition of the deflector base 70 with respect to the bonnet 76 along with the geometric characteristics (the various down angles and interleaved disposition of the lands 77A, 77B and channels 78A, 78B) of the deflector base 70 and bonnet 76 determine the size and shape of the flow passageway 80 and discharge port 82. The discharge port 82 functions to choke the flow of the suppressant in the flow passageway 80 and shear the liquid or liquefied-gas (from hereon, any reference to liquid in this specification also encompasses liquefied-gas) suppressant in the liquid/gas flow mixture (via propagated shock waves) at the discharge port 82 to atomize (create liquid droplets smaller than about 10 micrometers (0.39 mils)) the suppressant droplets in the discharge suppressant flow 84 which leaves the nozzle 20 and enters the fire zone. The shear produced at the discharge port 82 is the result of the discrepancy between the velocity of the suppressant flow (which is discharged at or near the speed of sound) and the velocity of the air in the fire zone. Thus, the small size of the discharge port 82 is capable of producing liquid suppressant droplets smaller than about 10 micrometers (0.79 mils). These small atomized droplets vaporize rapidly to release the liquefied gas suppressant agent to the atmosphere of the fire zone.
Similarly, the disposition of the deflector base 70 with respect to the bonnet 76 along with the geometric characteristics (the various down angles and interleaved disposition of the lands 77A, 77B and channels 78A, 78B) of the deflector base 70 and bonnet 76 also cause two types of flow perturbations 84A and 84B (the significance of each perturbation will be addressed subsequently in this specification) which determine the direction (and ultimately the distribution and dispersion) of the atomized suppressant flow 84 discharged into the fire zone. Both types of flow perturbations 84A and 84B are effective for creating droplet distribution and dispersion in the fire zone because the atomized droplets (less than about 10 micrometers) leaving the discharge outlet 82 better follow the general path (a general path which is determined by the aforementioned geometric characteristics of the nozzle 20) of the gas suppressant 64 or vaporized suppressant 26 or 26* (
In
The fasteners 72 extend upward through the deflector base 70 and through the spacers 74 and are received by the counter bore holes 91 in the bonnet 76. The counter bore holes extend upwards into the bonnet 76 from the concave surface 92 or from the channels 78. The lower portion of the counter bore holes 91 receive the spacers 74, which contact the bottom of the counter bore. The upper portion of the counter bore holes 91 may be tapped to thread with the fasteners 72, which secures the deflector base 72 to the bonnet 76.
The concave surface 92 extends outward and downward from the inlet port 94. The concave surface 92 has circumferentially alternating lands 77B and channels 78B. The lands 77B project from the concave surface 92 and the channels 78B extend into the concave surface 92. The down angle of the lands 77B and channels 78B (with respect to the axis 89) may vary from embodiment to embodiment. The inlet port 94 extends symmetrically through the bonnet 76, and generally aligns vertically with the axis of symmetry 89 on the deflector base 70. The sides of the inlet port 94 are threaded to secure to the pipe end 56. The concave surface 92 extends radially outward and downward to the side surface 98. The side surface 98 is circumferential in shape and extends from the flow surface 92 to the top surface 100. The top surface 100 extends upward and has a portion adapted with the inlet port 94 extending therethrough. The top surface 100 may abut a surface such as a ceiling or wall when the nozzle 20 is installed in the fire zone.
The threads on the pipe end 56 of the pipe network 18 (
In the embodiment shown, the channels 78A and lands 77A are wedge shaped and extend into or project from the deflector base 70. Likewise, the channels 78B and lands 77B are wedge shaped and extend into or project from the bonnet 76. Each channel 78A and 78B gets wider and deeper (with respect to the top convex surface 88 or concave surface 92) as it extends radially outward from the adjacent the axis 89 to the discharge port 82 at the side surfaces 90 or 98. Each channel 78A, 78B or land 77A, 77B (or a group of channels 78A, 78B or lands 77A, 77B) may have a down angle that differs from that of the other channels 78A, 78B or lands 77A, 77B (or groups of channels 78A, 78B or lands 77A, 77B) in the deflector base 70 or the bonnet 76.
When the deflector base 70 is disposed below the bonnet 76 in an assembled position as illustrated in
As illustrated in
The bottom outer portion of the flow passageway 80 becomes the discharge port 82 at the side surfaces 90 and 98 of the deflector base 70 and the bonnet 76. The discharge port 82 extends circumferentially around the nozzle 20 and is defined by the space between the deflector base 70 and bonnet 76 at each features edge. In the embodiment shown, a substantially constant discharge port 82 size (height and width) is maintained around the entire circumference of the nozzle 20. Alternatively, the discharge port 82 may vary in size around the circumference of the nozzle 20 or extend only through portions of the side surfaces 90 and 98. In one embodiment, the stand-off height of the discharge port 82 is between about 100 micrometers to about 200 micrometers (about 4/1000 inch to about 8/1000 inch). As indicated previously, the relatively small size of the discharge port 82 functions to choke the flow of the suppressant in the flow passageway 80 and shear the liquid suppressant in the liquid/gas flow mixture (via propagated shock waves) at the discharge port 82 to atomize (create liquid droplets smaller than about 10 micrometers (0.39 mils)) the liquid suppressant droplets in the discharge suppressant flow 84 which leaves the nozzle 20 and enters the fire zone. The shear produced at the discharge port 82 is the result of the discrepancy between the velocity of the suppressant flow (which is discharged at or near the speed of sound) and the velocity of the air in the fire zone.
The down angles of the features which define the flow passageway 80 direct the suppressant flow radially outward and downward through the flow passageway 80 and out through the discharge port 82. The down angle of the suppressant flow in the flow passageway 80 is correlated to the direction of the down angle flow 84A upon exiting the discharge port 82. Thus, the down angles of the interleaved lands 77A, 77B and channels 78A, 78B with respect to the axis 89 are responsible for generating the first flow perturbation, the down angle flow 84A. The direction of the down angle flow 84A away from the surface (such as a wall or ceiling) from which the nozzle 20 extends reduces the chances that the suppressant flow will impinge or attach to that surface. Thus, with the down angle flow 84A greater dispersion and disbursement of liquid suppressant in the fire zone may be achieved. Alternatively, the features which define the flow passageway 80 may be given steep down angles such that the resulting down angle flow 84A is directed downward to a particular localized location in the fire zone.
The second flow perturbation, the streamwise vorticity suppressant flow 84B, is the result of the interleaved lands 77A, 77B and channels 78A, 78B of the bonnet 76 and the deflector base 70. The geometry of the channels 78, specifically the channel edges which extend along the entire radial length of the channels 78, create a discontinuity or segmentation in the flow in the flow passageway 80. Instead of flowing outward in the flow passageway 80 as a uniform sheet, the discharge flow encounters a slight obstruction at the edges of each of the channels 78A and 78B. The result of this obstruction is a discrepancy between the velocity of the flow at the edges of the channels 78A and 78B and the velocity of the flow in the central portions of the channels 78A and 78B. The resulting velocity gradient causes a portion of the discharge suppressant flow 84 adjacent the edges of the channels 78A and 78B to rotate or roll up upon itself as the flow 84 exits the discharge port 82. The direction of the rolling of the streamwise vorticity suppressant flow 84B is a vector perpendicular to the orientation of the discharge port 82. Each channel 78 generates multiple streamwise vorticity suppressant flows 84B along each edge which propagate outward generally along the path of the remainder of the discharge suppressant flow 84 (for example along the path of the down angle flow 84A). The rotating streamwise vorticity suppressant flows 84B are effective for introducing turbulence into the discharge suppressant flow 84 to help augment mixing of the small droplets with the gas suppressant 64 or vaporized suppressant 26 or 26* (
As shown in
As shown in
The nozzle 20 shown in
The small distance the deflector base 70 is spaced off the bonnet 76 (coupled with the different down angle of the deflector base 70 with respect to the down angle of the bonnet 76 in some embodiments) creates a small discharge port 82 along the outer edge of the deflector base 70 and bonnet 76. More specifically, the discharge port 82 is defined by the distance between the top convex surface 88 of the deflector base 70 and the bottom concave surface 92 of the bonnet 76 at the circumferential edge of each of those components. In one embodiment, the distance between the deflector base 70 and bonnet 76 at the discharge port 82 is between about 100 micrometers to about 200 micrometers (about 4/1000 inch to about 8/1000 inch).
The relatively small size of the discharge port 82 functions to choke the flow of the suppressant in the flow passageway 80 and shear the liquid suppressant in the liquid/gas flow mixture (via propagated shock waves) at the discharge port 82 to atomize (create liquid droplets smaller than about 10 micrometers (0.39 mils)) the liquid suppressant droplets in the discharge suppressant flow 84 which leaves the nozzle 20 and enters the fire zone. The shear produced at the discharge port 82 is the result of the discrepancy between the velocity of the suppressant flow (which is discharged at or near the speed of sound) and the velocity of the air in the fire zone.
The down angles of the features which define the flow passageway 80 direct the suppressant flow radially outward and downward through the flow passageway 80 and out through the discharge port 82. The down angle of the suppressant flow in the flow passageway 80 is correlated to the direction of the down angle flow 84A upon exiting the discharge port 82. Thus, the down angles of the top frustoconical surface 88, frustoconical surface 92, and channels 78 with respect to the axis 89 are responsible for generating the first flow perturbation, the down angle flow 84A perturbation. The direction of the down angle flow 84A away from the surface (such as a wall or ceiling) from which the nozzle 20 extends reduces the chances that the suppressant flow will impinge or attach to that surface. Thus, with the down angle flow 84A, greater dispersion and disbursement of liquid suppressant in the fire zone may be achieved. Alternatively, the features which define the flow passageway 80 may be given steep down angles such that the resulting down angle flow 84A is directed downward to a particular localized location in the fire zone.
Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, workers skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2008/013840 | 12/18/2008 | WO | 00 | 6/17/2011 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2010/071622 | 6/24/2010 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
D264617 | Freeman | May 1982 | S |
4688720 | MacDonald et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4967961 | Hunter | Nov 1990 | A |
5377798 | Hudson et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5718381 | Katzer et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
6371212 | Jackson | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6763894 | Schoenrock et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6843433 | Ryou | Jan 2005 | B1 |
7090028 | Adiga et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7153446 | Grigg | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7232081 | Kah, Jr. et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
20030075343 | Ballard | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040256118 | Dunster et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050001065 | Senecal | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20070034387 | Andersen et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070267516 | Feith et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Patent Cooperation Treaty, International Search Report and Written Opinion, Feb. 17, 2009, 8 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110259617 A1 | Oct 2011 | US |