The present disclosure relates generally to wireless communications. More particularly, the present disclosure relates to ATSC transmitter identifier signaling.
Positioning receivers that are based on time-of-flight, such as GPS receivers, rely on extremely precise measurements of signal arrival times from multiple transmitter sites. Each relative time-of-flight measurement, when combined with the propagation speed of the signal and precise knowledge of transmitter positions, represents a constraint on the possible receiver location. An estimate of position can be formed by combining several such constraints.
This approach to positioning has been considered either unfeasible or, at least, extremely challenging for broadcast transmissions that use single-frequency network (SFN) technology, such as typical with Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB), Integrated Services Digital Broadcasting-Terrestrial (ISDB-T), Digital Audio Broadcasting (DAB), and Advanced Television Systems Committee Mobile/Handheld (ATSC-M/H) networks. In an SFN network, geographically dispersed transmitters emit time-synchronized replica signals. Hence, the signals arriving from different towers are not distinguishable, and it is not straightforward to associate the arrival of particular quanta of signal energy with any particular transmitter site.
The situation is made even more difficult by multipath, in which a signal may reflect and refract as it transits to the receiver along many different paths, each of which may overlap and either cancel or obscure the arrivals of weaker signals from other transmitters.
Another obstacle to positioning for all SFNs is high near-far ratios. That is, the ratio of received power from different transmitters may be extreme. Since all transmitters share the same frequency in an SFN, a high near-far ratio makes it difficult for receivers to reject a strong signal in favor of a weaker one. A consequence of the near-far effect is that the weaker signals may not be detected and hence not used for ranging, or may suffer increased ranging errors. In the limit, this effect can prevent positioning altogether, as a single very “loud” signal can drown out all others. The better a receiver system is at rejecting near-far effects, the larger the potential coverage area of the positioning system.
As the nomenclature suggests, near-far effects frequently occur due to the path loss difference between a distant and nearby transmitter. Large near-far ratio can also be the result of anisotropic building attenuation, fading, or differences in transmitter effective radiated power (ERP). Even GPS, despite near-uniform outdoor power flux, can suffer from high near-far ratio due to the differential attenuation of signals from different satellites when indoors.
Some SFN standards have defined “watermark” overlay signals intended for ranging and/or channel characterization. These overlay signals are transmitted in synchrony with the main signal, but at far lower power levels. For example, the ATSC A/110 standard defines a 64K-chip 2-VSB Kasami sequence that can be “buried” between 21 and 39 dB below the main 8-VSB signal. To a receiver attempting to demodulate the main signal, such a buried signal has an effect similar to Gaussian noise and, if buried sufficiently, will have no significant effect on the reception characteristics of the main signal. A receiver that is ranging from the watermark correlates against the Kasami reference sequence, taking advantage of the consequent processing gain to reduce the interference caused by the main 8-VSB signal.
Though watermark-style signals can be used for positioning, they are not effective in environments with even moderate near-far ratio. For example, consider an A/110-compliant SFN signal in which the watermark has been buried by 39 dB. One cycle of the Kasami code has a processing gain of 10*log(216)=48 dB. Assuming that 13 dB SNR is the minimum required for accurate peak classification and ranging, and assuming 17 dB of integration (˜0.3 s) is employed to reduce the interference created by the stronger 8-VSB signal, a usable dynamic range of only 48−39−13+17=13 dB remains. That is, if the stronger signal is just 13 dB more powerful than the weaker one as measured at the receiver, ranging won't be possible from the weaker signal. In real-life scenarios with terrestrial transmitters, near-far ratios can exceed that value by a factor of 1000 or more.
In general, in one aspect, an embodiment features an apparatus comprising: a code generator adapted to generate a transmitter identification block, wherein the transmitter identification block comprises 32 rows and 82 columns, wherein the first 66 symbols in each of the rows comprises a cyclically-extended 63-chip pseudonoise code that is selectively polarity-inverted according to a respective phase of a 32-chip Walsh code, and wherein each of the last 16 columns comprises a parity-extended 31-chip Gold code that is selectively polarity-inverted according to a respective phase of a 16-chip Walsh code; and a code inserter adapted to insert each of the rows into the reserved block of a respective one of 32 consecutive field synchronization segments in an Advanced Television Systems Committee (ATSC) television signal prior to transmission of the ATSC television signal.
Embodiments of the apparatus can include one or more of the following features. Some embodiments comprise a transmitter adapted to transmit the ATSC signal wirelessly; wherein at least one of the 32-chip Walsh code, the 31-chip Gold code, and the 16-chip Walsh code represents an identifier of the transmitter. In some embodiments, the 31-chip Gold code and the 16-chip Walsh code together represent a market identity of the transmitter; and the 32-chip Walsh code represents a transmitter identity of the transmitter. In some embodiments, the 63-chip pseudonoise code is defined by the polynomial X6+X5+X2+X+1 and a preload value of ‘100111’. In some embodiments, the 31-chip Gold code is defined by the polynomials X5+X2+1 and X5+X4+X3+X2+1, each with a preload value of ‘100111’.
In general, in one aspect, an embodiment features a computer program comprising: instructions for generating a transmitter identification block, wherein the transmitter identification block comprises 32 rows and 82 columns, wherein the first 66 symbols in each of the rows comprises a cyclically-extended 63-chip pseudonoise code that is selectively polarity-inverted according to a respective phase of a 32-chip Walsh code, and wherein each of the last 16 columns comprises a parity-extended 31-chip Gold code that is selectively polarity-inverted according to a respective phase of a 16-chip Walsh code; and instructions for inserting each of the rows into the reserved block of a respective one of 32 consecutive field synchronization segments in an Advanced Television Systems Committee (ATSC) television signal prior to transmission of the ATSC television signal.
Embodiments of the computer-readable media can include one or more of the following features. In some embodiments, the 32-chip Walsh code, the 31-chip Gold code, and the 16-chip Walsh code together represent an identifier of a wireless transmitter of the ATSC signal. In some embodiments, the 31-chip Gold code and the 16-chip Walsh code together represent a market identity of the transmitter; and the 32-chip Walsh code represents a transmitter identity of the transmitter. In some embodiments, the 63-chip pseudonoise code is defined by the polynomial X6+X5+X2+X+1 and a preload value of ‘100111’. In some embodiments, the 31-chip Gold code is defined by the polynomials X5+X2+1 and X5+X4+X3+X2+1, each with a preload value of ‘100111’.
In general, in one aspect, an embodiment features an apparatus comprising: a code extractor adapted to extract a transmitter identification block from 32 consecutive field synchronization segments of an Advanced Television Systems Committee (ATSC) television signal, wherein the transmitter identification block comprises 32 rows and 82 columns, wherein the first 66 symbols in each of the rows comprises a cyclically-extended 63-chip pseudonoise code that is selectively polarity-inverted according to a respective phase of a 32-chip Walsh code, and wherein each of the last 16 columns comprises a parity-extended 31-chip Gold code that is selectively polarity-inverted according to a respective phase of a 16-chip Walsh code; and a transmitter identification module adapted to identify a transmitter of the ATSC signal based on the 32-chip Walsh code, the 31-chip Gold code, and the 16-chip Walsh code.
Embodiments of the apparatus can include one or more of the following features. Some embodiments comprise a receiver adapted to receive the ATSC signal wirelessly. Some embodiments comprise a pseudorange module adapted to obtain a pseudorange based on the ATSC signal. Some embodiments comprise a position module adapted to determine a position of the apparatus based on the pseudorange. In some embodiments, the transmitter identification module comprises: a market identity module adapted to obtain the 31-chip Gold code and the 16-chip Walsh code from the transmitter identification block, wherein the 31-chip Gold code and the 16-chip Walsh code together represent a market identity of the transmitter; a phase identifier adapted to identify a phase of the 32-chip Walsh code based on the 31-chip Gold code; and a transmitter identity module adapted to obtain the 32-chip Walsh code from the transmitter identification block based on the phase of the 32-chip Walsh code, wherein the 32-chip Walsh code represents a transmitter identity of the transmitter. In some embodiments, the 63-chip pseudonoise code is defined by the polynomial X6+X5+X2+X+1 and a preload value of ‘100111 ’. In some embodiments, the 31-chip Gold code is defined by the polynomials X5+X2+1 and X5+X4+X3+X2+1, each with a preload value of ‘100111’.
In general, in one aspect, an embodiment features a computer program comprising: instructions for extracting a transmitter identification block from 32 consecutive field synchronization segments of an Advanced Television Systems Committee (ATSC) television signal, wherein the transmitter identification block comprises 32 rows and 82 columns, wherein the first 66 symbols in each of the rows comprises a cyclically-extended 63-chip pseudonoise code that is selectively polarity-inverted according to a respective phase of a 32-chip Walsh code, and wherein each of the last 16 columns comprises a parity-extended 31-chip Gold code that is selectively polarity-inverted according to a respective phase of a 16-chip Walsh code; and instructions for identifying a transmitter of the ATSC signal based on at least one of the 32-chip Walsh code, the 31-chip Gold code, and the 16-chip Walsh code.
Embodiments of the computer-readable media can include one or more of the following features. Some embodiments comprise instructions for obtaining a pseudorange based on the ATSC signal. Some embodiments comprise instructions for determining a position of the apparatus based on the pseudorange. Some embodiments comprise instructions for obtaining the 31-chip Gold code and the 16-chip Walsh code from the transmitter identification block, wherein the 31-chip Gold code and the 16-chip Walsh code together represent a market identity of the transmitter; instructions for identifying a phase of the 32-chip Walsh code based on the 31-chip Gold code; and instructions for obtaining the 32-chip Walsh code from the transmitter identification block based on the phase of the 32-chip Walsh code, wherein the 32-chip Walsh code represents a transmitter identity of the transmitter. In some embodiments, the 63-chip pseudonoise code is defined by the polynomial X6+X5+X2+X+1 and a preload value of ‘100111 ’. In some embodiments, the 31-chip Gold code is defined by the polynomials X5+X2+1 and X5+X4+X3+X2+1, each with a preload value of ‘100111’.
The details of one or more implementations are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.
The leading digit(s) of each reference numeral used in this specification indicates the number of the drawing in which the reference numeral first appears.
Embodiments of the present disclosure provide transmitter identifier signaling. The transmitter identifier has two parts: a market identity and a transmitter identity (ID). The market ID can refer to any grouping of transmitters, such as those within a predetermined geographical area, and the like. The transmitter ID is unique to each transmitter within a market ID group. Transmitter identification allows the transmitted signals to be used for position determination of mobile devices, also referred to generally herein as “user terminals.”
The transmitter identifier is encoded in a transmitter identification block that has 32 rows and 82 columns. The first 66 symbols in each row are populated by a cyclically-extended 63-chip pseudonoise code that is selectively polarity-inverted according to a respective phase of a 32-chip Walsh code that represents the transmitter ID. Each of the last 16 columns comprises a parity-extended 31-chip Gold code that is selectively polarity-inverted according to a respective phase of a 16-chip Walsh code. The 31-chip Gold code and the 16-chip Walsh code together represent the market ID. Each of the rows of the transmitter identification block is inserted into the reserved block of a respective one of 32 consecutive field synchronization segments in an Advanced Television Systems Committee (ATSC) television signal prior to transmission of the ATSC television signal. The transmitter identification block can be recovered by a receiver of the ATSC signal, and used to identify the transmitter. After identifying the transmitter, the receiver can use the ATSC signal to determine the position of the receiver.
Because there are 32 distinct orthogonal Walsh codes of length 32, the transmitter ID address space is 32 entries long. And because there are 33 distinct Gold codes and 16 distinct orthogonal Walsh codes of length 16, the market ID address space is 528 entries long. Together the transmitter ID and market ID provide for up to 16,896 unique transmitter identifiers. In some embodiments, fewer unique transmitter identifiers are needed. In such embodiments, the transmitter identifier can consist of only one or two of the codes (that is, the 32-chip Walsh code, the 31-chip Gold code, and the 16-chip Walsh code).
The phrase “user terminal” is meant to refer to any object capable of implementing the pseudoranging techniques described herein. Examples of user terminals include PDAs, mobile phones, cars and other vehicles, and any object which could include a chip or software implementing the pseudoranging techniques described herein. Further, the term “user terminal” is not intended to be limited to objects which are “terminals” or which are operated by “users.”
In some embodiments, user terminal 102 performs the positioning techniques described herein. In other embodiments, some or all of the positioning techniques are performed by a location server 106 based on measurements collected by user terminal 102 and relayed by a relay station 108 such as a cellular base station and the like. The locations of ATSC transmitting stations 104 can be stored in an ATSC transmitter location database 112. The location of user terminal 102 can be transmitted to an E911 location server 116 for emergencies.
The ATSC signal is described in ATSC A/53E: “Digital Television Standard,” Advanced Television Systems Committee, Washington, D.C., 13 Sep. 2006; and ATSC A/110: “Synchronization Standard for Distributed Transmission,” Advanced Television Systems Committee, Washington, D.C., 14 Jul. 2004. The ATSC signal uses 8-ary Vestigial Sideband Modulation (8 VSB). The symbol rate of the ATSC signal is 10.762237 MHz, which is derived from a 27.000000 MHz clock. The structure of the ATSC frame is illustrated in
The structure of the ATSC field synchronization segment is illustrated in
Each row of transmitter ID section 402 is populated with a cyclically-extended 63-chip pseudonoise code PN63T that is selectively polarity-inverted according to a respective phase of a 32-chip Walsh code that represents the transmitter ID. (The added ‘T’ is to distinguish the PN63T sequence from the PN63 sequences following the PN511 sequences in the field synchronization segment.) The PN63T sequence is defined by the polynomial X6+X5+X2+X+1 and a preload value of ‘100111 ’ and is cyclically extended by 3 chips for a total length of 66 chips to fill the 66-symbol row.
The transmitter ID is encoded in transmitter ID section 402 by polarity-inverting each of the 32 rows in transmitter ID section 402 according to a respective phase of a 32-chip Walsh code that represents the transmitter ID. That is, when the phase (that is, chip) of the Walsh code is a “1” the polarity of each of the 66 chips of the corresponding row is inverted, and when the phase of the Walsh code is a “0” the polarity of each of the 66 chips of the corresponding row is not inverted. For example, if the first chip of the Walsh code is a “1” then the polarity of each of the 66 chips in the first row of transmitter ID section 402 is inverted.
Each column of market ID section 404 is populated with a parity-extended 31-chip Gold code G(n) that is selectively polarity-inverted according to a respective phase of a 16-chip Walsh code that represents the market ID. The Gold code is defined by the polynomials X5+X2+1 and X5+X4+X3+X2+1, each with a preload value of ‘100111 ’, and is parity-extended by 1 chip for a total length of 32 chips to fill the 32-symbol columns in market ID section 404.
To create any of the 33 possible Gold codes, the phase of the second Gold code polynomial (X5+X4+X3+X2+1) is offset by one bit for each successive Gold code. That is, the first Gold code G(0) is the XOR of both constituent Gold codes. The second Gold code G(1) is the same except that the second polynomial's PN code is advanced (that is, left-rotated) by 1 bit prior to the XOR operation. G(2) advances the second PN code by 2 bits, and so on up to G(30). The two original polynomials (X5+X2+1 and X5+X4+X3+X2+1) each constitute a Gold code themselves, G(31) and G(32), thus completing the set of 33 Gold codes, each with a length of 31 bits. An even parity bit is added to each Gold code to extend it to 32 bits, and also to ensure that each Gold code is bit-balanced (that is, has an equal number of 1 and 0 bits).
The market ID is encoded in market ID section 404 by polarity-inverting each of the 16 columns in market ID section 404 according to a respective phase of a 16-chip Walsh code that represents the market ID. That is, when the phase (that is, chip) of the Walsh code is a “1” the polarity of each of the 32 chips of the corresponding column is inverted, and when the phase of the Walsh code is a “0” the polarity of each of the 32 chips of the corresponding column is not inverted. For example, if the first chip of the Walsh code is a “1” then the polarity of each of the 32 chips in the first column of market ID section 404 is inverted.
Referring to
Referring again to
Code inserter 506 inserts transmitter identification blocks 512 into baseband ATSC signal 510 (step 606). In particular, code inserter 506 inserts each of the rows of transmitter identification block 512 into the reserved block of a respective one of 32 consecutive field synchronization segments of ATSC signal 510.
Because only one row of transmitter identification block 512 is sent during each field synchronization segment, it takes approximately 774 ms to transmit one full transmitter identification block 512. Transmitter identification block 512 repeats every 32 field synchronization segments. The field synchronization segment containing the first row of transmitter identification block 512 is assumed to be sent at an absolute time corresponding to GPS time 0. All subsequent repetitions occur at integer multiples of 32 field synchronization segments.
The signal 514 produced by code inserter 506 is passed to transmitter 508, which transmits wireless ATSC signal 110 representing signal 514 (step 608). Wireless ATSC signal 110 includes transmitter identification block 512 representing the transmitter identifier of transmitter 508 and/or transmitting station 104. The transmitter identifier includes the transmitter ID and market ID for transmitter 508 and/or transmitting station 104. Transmitter 508 can be implemented in any manner. For example, transmitter 508 can be implemented as a commercially-available unit.
Referring to
Referring to
Code extractor 704 extracts a phaseless transmitter identification block 720 from received ATSC signal 110 (step 804). That is, code extractor 704 collects the symbols in the reserved blocks of at least 32 consecutive field synchronization segments of ATSC signal 110, and constructs a phaseless transmitter identification block 720 from the collected symbols. To construct phaseless transmitter identification block 720, code extractor first synchronizes with the synchronization components of ATSC signal 110 such as the field synchronization segments. This synchronization can be performed according to conventional techniques. Code extractor 704 then passes phaseless transmitter identification block 720 to transmitter identification module 706, which identifies transmitting station 104 of received ATSC signal 110 based on the 32-chip Walsh code, the 31-chip Gold code, and the 16-chip Walsh code present in received ATSC signal 110, as described in detail below.
On reception at transmitter identification module 706, the phase of phaseless transmitter identification block 720 is unknown. That is, the rows of phaseless transmitter identification block 720 may be rotated so that the first row of phaseless transmitter identification block 720 is not the first row of transmitter identification block 512. That is, phaseless transmitter identification block 720 may be a row-rotated version of transmitter identification block 512. The phase of phaseless transmitter identification block 720 can be recovered as described below.
Market identity module 708 obtains the 31-chip Gold code and the 16-chip Walsh code from phaseless transmitter identification block 720 (step 806). Market identity module 708 can be implemented as one or more correlators. For example, market identity module 708 can store 16 copies of phaseless transmitter identification block 720 in 16 respective registers, and can correlate each of the copies with a different one of the 16 possible 16-chip Walsh code to identify the 16-chip Walsh code used by transmitting station 104. Once the 16-chip Walsh code is known, phaseless transmitter identification block 720 can be correlated with the 33 possible 31-chip parity-extended Gold codes to identify the 31-chip Gold code used by transmitting station 104. The 31-chip Gold code and the 16-chip Walsh code together represent the market ID of transmitting station 104.
Because the Gold codes are encoded vertically (that is, column-wise) in phaseless transmitter identification block 720, they can be used to determine the phase of phaseless transmitter identification block 720. Phase identifier 710 identifies the phase of phaseless transmitter identification block 720 (that is, the phase of the 32-chip Walsh code) based on the 31-chip Gold code (step 808).
Transmitter identity module 712 obtains the 32-chip Walsh code from phaseless transmitter identification block 720 based on the phase of the 32-chip Walsh code (step 810). The 32-chip Walsh code represents the transmitter ID of transmitting station 104. Transmitter identity module 712 can be implemented as one or more correlators.
In some embodiments, user terminal 102 obtains a pseudorange based on wireless ATSC signal 110 (step 812). In these embodiments, pseudorange module 714 can obtain a pseudorange based on pseudonoise sequences present in wireless ATSC signal 110.
In some embodiments, user terminal 102 determines its position based on the pseudorange (step 814). In these embodiments, position module 716 determines the position of user terminal 102 based on one or more of the pseudoranges generated by pseudorange module 714 and the locations of the transmitting stations 104 associated with the pseudoranges. Because the transmitting stations 104 associated with these pseudoranges have been identified, their locations can be determined. These locations can be uploaded to user terminal 102. Position module 716 determines the position of user terminal 102 based on the pseudoranges and the locations of the associated transmitting stations 104. The position determination can include other ranges and pseudoranges as well. For example, GPS signals can be used.
In some embodiments, the position of user terminal 102 is determined by location server 106 (
One of the difficulties in identifying transmitters in a distributed transmission network is overcoming the near-far problem at the receiver. The techniques described above seek to maximize the processing gain and hence minimize the threshold for detection under such circumstances.
With the 31-chip Gold codes replicated 16 times, an effective processing gain of about 25.3 dB is expected. Successful determination of the 32-chip Walsh code phase requires about 9 dB of post-processing SNR. Thus, the pre-processing SNR is 16.3 dB below the noise floor. Assuming a threshold of visibility of +15.2 dB for a normal ATSC broadcast, a successful Gold code detection is possible down to about 31.5 dB below the threshold for visibility.
Since all transmitters within a network are synchronized, the Gold code acquisition and phase determination only needs to succeed for one (presumably the strongest) transmitter being detected. This code extraction is not subject to the same near-far problems as the 32-chip Walsh code phase extraction.
Similarly, for the PN63T code (extended to 66 bits) replicated 32 times, an effective processing gain of about 33.2 dB is expected. Successful determination of the exact transmitter ID requires about 9 dB of post-processing SNR. Thus the pre-processing SNR is 24.2 dB below the noise floor. Again, assuming a threshold of visibility of +15.2 dB, a successful Transmitter ID detection is possible down to about 39.4 dB below the threshold for visibility. Since multiple transmitter IDs will be received simultaneously, each ID must be extracted separately, even when subject to near-far interference issues.
Embodiments of the disclosure can be implemented in digital electronic circuitry, or in computer hardware, firmware, software, or in combinations of them. Embodiments of the disclosure can be implemented in a computer program product tangibly embodied in a machine-readable storage device for execution by a programmable processor; and method steps of the disclosure can be performed by a programmable processor executing a program of instructions to perform functions of the disclosure by operating on input data and generating output. The disclosure can be implemented advantageously in one or more computer programs that are executable on a programmable system including at least one programmable processor coupled to receive data and instructions from, and to transmit data and instructions to, a data storage system, at least one input device, and at least one output device. Each computer program can be implemented in a high-level procedural or object-oriented programming language, or in assembly or machine language if desired; and in any case, the language can be a compiled or interpreted language. Suitable processors include, by way of example, both general and special purpose microprocessors. Generally, a processor will receive instructions and data from a read-only memory and/or a random access memory. Generally, a computer will include one or more mass storage devices for storing data files; such devices include magnetic disks, such as internal hard disks and removable disks; magneto-optical disks; and optical disks. Storage devices suitable for tangibly embodying computer program instructions and data include all forms of non-volatile memory, including by way of example semiconductor memory devices, such as EPROM, EEPROM, and flash memory devices; magnetic disks such as internal hard disks and removable disks; magneto-optical disks; and CD-ROM disks. Any of the foregoing can be supplemented by, or incorporated in, ASICs (application-specific integrated circuits).
A number of implementations of the disclosure have been described.
Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure. Accordingly, other implementations are within the scope of the following claims.
This application claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/020,389 filed Jan. 10, 2008, the disclosure thereof incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4555707 | Connelly | Nov 1985 | A |
4652884 | Starker | Mar 1987 | A |
4700306 | Wallmander | Oct 1987 | A |
4894662 | Counselman | Jan 1990 | A |
5045861 | Duffett-Smith | Sep 1991 | A |
5157686 | Omura et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5166952 | Omura et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5271034 | Abaunza | Dec 1993 | A |
5323322 | Mueller et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5398034 | Spilker, Jr. | Mar 1995 | A |
5481316 | Patel | Jan 1996 | A |
5504492 | Class et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5510801 | Engelbrecht et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5604765 | Bruno et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5630206 | Urban et al. | May 1997 | A |
5648982 | Durrant et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5774829 | Cisneros et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5784339 | Woodsum et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5835060 | Czarnecki et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5920284 | Victor | Jul 1999 | A |
5952958 | Speasl et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5953311 | Davies et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6006097 | Hornfeldt et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6016119 | Krasner | Jan 2000 | A |
6078284 | Levanon | Jun 2000 | A |
6094168 | Duffett-Smith et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6107959 | Levanon | Aug 2000 | A |
6137441 | Dai et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6144413 | Zatsman | Nov 2000 | A |
6147642 | Perry et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6181921 | Konisi et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6184921 | Limberg | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6201497 | Snyder et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6215778 | Lomp et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6289280 | Fernandez-Corbaton et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6313882 | Limberg et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6317452 | Durrant et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6317500 | Murphy | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6373432 | Rabinowitz et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6374177 | Lee et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6400753 | Kohli et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6433740 | Gilhousen | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6437832 | Grabb et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6484034 | Tsunehara et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6522297 | Rabinowitz et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6559800 | Rabinowitz et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6559894 | Omura et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6590529 | Schwoegler | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6646603 | Dooley et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6650653 | Horng et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6717547 | Spilker, Jr. et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6727847 | Rabinowitz et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6753812 | Rabinowitz et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6806830 | Panasik et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6816204 | Limberg | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6839024 | Spilker, Jr. et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6859173 | Spilker, Jr. et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6861984 | Rabinowitz et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6879286 | Rabinowitz et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6907064 | Tokunaga et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6914560 | Spilker, Jr. et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6917328 | Rabinowitz et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6937866 | Duffett-Smith et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6952182 | Spilker, Jr. et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6961020 | Robinowitz et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6963306 | Spilker, Jr. et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6970132 | Spilker, Jr. et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7042396 | Omura et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7042949 | Omura et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7111221 | Birru et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7126536 | Rabinowitz et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7260378 | Holland et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7269424 | Camp, Jr. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7307665 | Opshaug et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7372405 | Rabinowitz et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7412018 | Natali et al. | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7463195 | Rabinowitz et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7661119 | Arsenault et al. | Feb 2010 | B1 |
20020122003 | Patwari et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020140867 | Weiss | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020184653 | Pierce et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020199196 | Rabinowitz et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030162547 | McNair | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040073914 | Spilker et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040201779 | Spilker et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050066373 | Rabinowitz | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050251844 | Martone et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060078072 | Cheon et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20070050824 | Lee et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070056017 | Takatori | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070121555 | Burgess et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070131079 | Opshaug et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070182633 | Omura et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070230460 | Jeong et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070245207 | Jl et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070296632 | Opshaug et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080019430 | Suzuki et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080043885 | Markman | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20090070847 | Furman et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090103670 | Minamino | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090161024 | Gao et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090225872 | Simon | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090274242 | Kwon et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100054361 | Yu et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100165213 | Knutson et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3242997 | May 1984 | DE |
58129277 | Aug 1983 | EP |
2 222 922 | Mar 1990 | GB |
2 254 508 | Oct 1992 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61020389 | Jan 2008 | US |