The present disclosure relates to heart valve replacement and, in particular, to collapsible prosthetic heart valves. More particularly, the present disclosure relates to collapsible prosthetic heart valves having designs that facilitate attachment of a valve assembly to a stent.
Prosthetic heart valves that are collapsible to a relatively small circumferential size can be delivered into a patient less invasively than valves that are not collapsible. For example, a collapsible valve may be delivered into a patient via a tube-like delivery apparatus such as a catheter, a trocar, a laparoscopic instrument, or the like. This collapsibility can avoid the need for a more invasive procedure such as full open-chest, open-heart surgery.
Collapsible prosthetic heart valves typically take the form of a valve structure mounted on a stent. There are two types of stents on which the valve structures are ordinarily mounted: a self-expanding stent and a balloon-expandable stent. To place such valves into a delivery apparatus and ultimately into a patient, the valve must first be collapsed or crimped to reduce its circumferential size.
When a collapsed prosthetic valve has reached the desired implant site in the patient (e.g., at or near the annulus of the patient's heart valve that is to be replaced by the prosthetic valve), the prosthetic valve can be deployed or released from the delivery apparatus and re-expanded to full operating size. For balloon-expandable valves, this generally involves releasing the valve, assuring its proper location, and then expanding a balloon positioned within the valve stent. For self-expanding valves, on the other hand, the stent automatically expands as the sheath covering the valve is withdrawn.
Typically, two adjacent leaflets of a prosthetic valve assembly form a commissure which is attached, for example by sutures, to a corresponding commissure attachment feature (“CAF”) of the stent of the prosthetic heart valve. CAFs are often larger or bulkier than other portions of the stent. It is typically desirable for the prosthetic heart valve to be collapsible to a small profile for transcatheter delivery, and a bulky CAF may result in a larger collapsed profile of the prosthetic heart valve compared to a less bulky CAF. Also, the position of the CAF within the prosthetic heart valve may result in undesirable interference between the CAF and the native anatomy upon implantation of the prosthetic heart valve. Thus, it may be desirable to provide a prosthetic heart valve that allows for secure attachment of leaflet commissures to the stent while minimizing the profile of the stent and reducing or eliminating the likelihood of interference between the CAFs and the native anatomy.
According to an aspect of the disclosure, a prosthetic mitral valve includes a collapsible stent, a cuff, and a prosthetic valve assembly. The stent includes a plurality of struts, a plurality of cells arranged in circumferential rows, the circumferential rows including a first row at an outflow end of the stent and a second row at an inflow end of the stent, and a plurality of strut intersections where at least two of the struts connect to one another. The cuff is attached to the stent. The prosthetic valve assembly is adapted to allow blood to flow from the inflow end of the stent toward the outflow end of the stent and to restrict blood from flowing from the outflow end of the stent toward the inflow of the stent. The prosthetic valve assembly includes a first prosthetic leaflet having a first end attached directly to a first one of the strut intersections, and a second prosthetic leaflet having a first end attached directly to the first strut intersection. The first strut intersection is partially formed of one of the struts of one of the cells in the first row.
As used herein, the term “inflow end,” when used in connection with a prosthetic heart valve, refers to the end of the heart valve through which blood first passes during antegrade blood flow, whereas the term “outflow end,” when used in connection with a prosthetic heart valve, refers to the end of the heart valve through which blood last passes during antegrade blood flow. The term “circumferential,” when used in connection with a prosthetic heart valve, refers to the direction around the perimeter of the valve. The term “leading end,” when used in connection with a suture, refers to the end initially advanced through a material, while the term “trailing end” refers to the opposite end.
Stent 102 may include one or more retaining elements 118 at distal end 132 thereof, the retaining elements being sized and shaped to cooperate with retaining structures provided on the deployment device (not shown). The engagement of retaining elements 118 with retaining structures on the deployment device helps maintain prosthetic heart valve 100 in assembled relationship with the deployment device, minimizes longitudinal movement of the prosthetic heart valve relative to the deployment device during unsheathing or resheathing procedures, and helps prevent rotation of the prosthetic heart valve relative to the deployment device as the deployment device is advanced to the target location and the heart valve is deployed. In some variations, retaining elements 118 may be disposed near proximal end 130 of heart valve 100.
Prosthetic heart valve 100 includes a valve assembly 104, preferably positioned in the annulus section 140 of stent 102 and secured to the stent. Valve assembly 104 may include a cuff 106 and a plurality of prosthetic valve elements, such as leaflets 108, which collectively function as a one-way valve by coapting with one another, generally allowing blood to flow in an antegrade direction from proximal end 130 to distal end 132, while substantially blocking blood from flowing in a retrograde direction from the distal end to the proximal end. As a prosthetic aortic valve, valve 100 has three leaflets 108. However, it will be appreciated that other prosthetic heart valves with which the present disclosure may be used may have more or fewer leaflets.
Although cuff 106 is shown in
Leaflets 108 may be attached along their belly portions 110 to cells 112 of stent 102, with the commissure between adjacent leaflets attached to CAFs 116. This is shown in
In the illustrated embodiment, CAFs 116 are formed by stent 102, or, in other words, are unitary or integral with the body of the stent. This may be achieved by, for example, laser cutting stent 102, including CAFs 116, from a single piece of material. CAFs 116 may add to the profile of valve 100 compared to an identical valve without the CAFs. CAFs 116 may also reduce the ability of stent body 102 to bend to match the anatomy during delivery, such as when the valve 100 is delivered through the aortic arch. This ability to bend or otherwise conform to the anatomy may be referred to as tracking ability. Because of their relative stiffness compared to the remainder of stent 102, CAFs 116 may also raise the likelihood of vessel trauma or particulate dislodgement, which may result in problems such as stroke. However, if CAFs 116 are not included in stent body 102, another method of attaching leaflets 108 to the stent may be required.
Prosthetic heart valve 100 may be used to replace, for example, a native aortic valve, a surgical heart valve, or a heart valve that has undergone a surgical procedure. The prosthetic heart valve may be delivered to the desired site (e.g., near the native aortic annulus) using any suitable delivery device. During delivery, the prosthetic heart valve is disposed inside the delivery device in the collapsed condition. The delivery device may be introduced into a patient using a transfemoral, transapical, transseptal, transaortic, subclavian, or any other percutaneous approach. Once the delivery device has reached the target site, the user may deploy prosthetic heart valve 100. Upon deployment, prosthetic heart valve 100 expands so that annulus section 140 is in secure engagement within the native aortic annulus. When the prosthetic heart valve is properly positioned inside the heart, it works as a one-way valve, allowing blood to flow from the left ventricle of the heart to the aorta, and preventing blood from flowing in the opposite direction.
The suture pattern of
At this stage, the trailing end of the suture is on the luminal (or inner) side of prosthetic heart valve 100, exiting through the lower left eyelet in the view of
With the leading end of the suture still exiting at point O-006 (
At this stage in the suturing process, the leading end of the suture exits the elongated eyelet at point O-018, while the trailing end still exits the elongated eyelet at point O-009. The two ends may be secured together, for example in a knot that is positioned within the elongated eyelet, to complete the suturing process. It will be appreciated that the suture pattern described in connection with
Although prosthetic heart valve 100 could be used to replace any of the native heart valves, it may be particularly suited for replacing the native aortic valve, as replacing other valves, such as the native mitral valve, may involve considerations that are additional to or different than those for aortic valve replacement. For example,
Prosthetic heart valve 200 may include stent 250, which may be formed from biocompatible materials that are capable of self-expansion, such as, for example, shape-memory alloys including nitinol. Stent 250 may include a plurality of struts 252 that form cells 254 connected to one another in one or more annular rows around the stent. Cells 254 may all be of substantially the same size around the perimeter and along the length of stent 250. Alternatively, cells 254 near inflow end 210 may be larger than the cells near outflow end 212. A plurality of CAFs 216 may be provided on the outflow end 212 of stent 250. Stent 250 may be expandable to provide a radial force to assist with positioning and stabilizing prosthetic heart valve 200 in the native valve annulus.
Prosthetic heart valve 200 may also include a substantially cylindrical valve assembly 260 including a plurality of leaflets 262 (
When prosthetic heart valve 200 is implanted in a patient, for example at the annulus of the native mitral valve, it is biased towards an expanded condition, providing radial force to anchor the valve in place. Generally, it is desirable for prosthetic mitral valves to avoid structure that extends too far into the left ventricle, as such structures may obstruct the LVOT. Also, it is generally preferable for a prosthetic mitral valve to avoid any structure that contacts the walls of the left ventricle, as such contact may cause conduction issues or disturbances in the heart.
It will be understood that when a prosthetic mitral valve incorporating stent 350 is properly implanted into a native mitral valve annulus, CAFs 316 and retaining elements 318 will extend toward and/or into the left ventricle of the patient. As noted above, it may be desirable to limit the structures extending into the left ventricle to help reduce LVOT obstruction and/or electrical conduction disturbances. Thus,
The suture pattern of
At this stage, the trailing end of the suture is still on the luminal side of the leaflets, exiting leaflet 462b at point I-101 (
The suture pattern of
At this stage, the trailing end of the suture is still on the luminal side of the leaflets, exiting leaflet 462b at point I-201 (
As noted above, the suture pattern for attaching two adjacent leaflets 462a, 462b to stent 450 at location P6, as described above, may be substantially the same as or identical to the suture pattern for attaching two adjacent leaflets to locations P7 or P8. However, although locations P6 and P7 are structurally identical (or nearly identical), location P8 may have slight structural differences compared to locations P6 and P7. For example, location P8, while still being formed at the intersection of two struts of a cell 454 in row 454b with two struts of an adjacent cell 454 in row 454b, may include a runner r that is longer in the longitudinal direction of stent 454 compared to strut connector 453 in locations P6 and P7. It should be understood that, in this context, the longitudinal direction refers to the direction extending from inflow end 410 to outflow end 412 of stent 450, or vice versa. It should be understood that, depending on the shape of stent 450 when it is in the expanded condition or otherwise in an implanted condition, the choice of particular connection locations may be driven, at least in part, by the shape of the stent at those locations and the corresponding geometry of the leaflets.
As noted above, stent 450 and the suture patterns described above enable not only the elimination of CAFs similar to CAFs 316 of stent 350, but also provide for flexibility in attachment locations of leaflets 462a, 462b to the stent. For example, attachment location P5 allows leaflets 462a, 462b to be positioned nearer outflow end 412 compared to attachment locations P6, P7, and P8, while attachment locations P6 and P7 provide intermediate attachment locations in the longitudinal direction compared to locations P5 and P8. In addition, attachment locations P6 and P7 enable attachment of leaflets 462a, 462b in either circumferential direction of stent 450 compared to attachment locations P5 and P8. The foregoing attachment options allow the prosthetic leaflets to be shifted in different directions relative to the native prosthetic valve annulus, which may assist in reducing LVOT obstruction, increasing sealing between the prosthetic heart valve and the native valve annulus, and/or optimizing prosthetic leaflet function. In addition, the various possible attachment locations enable other features to be incorporated into stent 450, while providing a leaflet attachment location that minimizes interference with such additional structures. For example, additional stent features such as clips, anchor arms, or the like that assist in capturing the native valve leaflets may be added to stent 450 at positions near where CAFs 316 of stent 350 are positioned. In that case, it may be preferable to attach the prosthetic leaflets to locations P6, P7, or P8, since location P5 would be near to, and could otherwise undesirably interfere with, the added anchor arms. In other examples, it may be desirable to provide stent 450 with a flange, such as a braided flange, that is to be positioned in the left atrium to help prevent migration of the prosthetic mitral valve into the left ventricle during operation. With such a braided flange, it may be desirable to provide braid connectors on stent 450 to attach the braided flange to the stent. Such braid connectors desirably may be positioned near the axial center of stent 450 in some embodiments. In those embodiments, it may be desirable to attach prosthetic leaflets 462a, 462b to attachment locations P5, P6, or P7, which are relatively far from the axial center of the stent compared to location P8. However, the broader implication is that the particular attachment sites of the leaflets can be picked based on various considerations which may be different based on the features of the prosthetic heart valve, allowing for significant flexibility in design choice.
According to an aspect of the disclosure, a prosthetic mitral valve comprises:
a collapsible stent including a plurality of struts, a plurality of cells arranged in circumferential rows, the circumferential rows including a first row at an outflow end of the stent and a second row at an inflow end of the stent, and a plurality of strut intersections where at least two of the struts connect to one another;
a cuff attached to the stent; and
a prosthetic valve assembly adapted to allow blood to flow from the inflow end of the stent toward the outflow end of the stent and to restrict blood from flowing from the outflow end of the stent toward the inflow of the stent, the prosthetic valve assembly including a first prosthetic leaflet having a first end attached directly to a first one of the strut intersections, and a second prosthetic leaflet having a first end attached directly to the first strut intersection,
wherein the first strut intersection is partially formed of one of the struts of one of the cells in the first row; and/or
a single suture attaching both the first end of the first prosthetic leaflet and the first end of the second prosthetic leaflet to the first strut intersection; and/or
the stent includes at least one retaining element sized and shaped to cooperate with a corresponding retaining structure of a delivery device, the retaining element including a strut extending from an apex of one of the cells in the first row of cells; and/or
the first strut intersection is a “Y”-shaped intersection formed by the strut of the retaining element, and two struts that form the apex of the one cell in the first row of cells; and/or
a single suture attaching both the first end of the first prosthetic leaflet and the first end of the second prosthetic leaflet to the “Y”-shaped intersection, the single suture having a leading end and a trailing end; and/or
the leading end of the suture is secured to the trailing end of the suture in a knot; and/or
the knot is positioned between the two struts that form the apex of the one cell in the first row of cells; and/or
the first strut intersection is an “X”-shaped intersection formed by four struts; and/or
the four struts forming the “X”-shaped intersection include first and second struts of a first cell in the first row, and third and fourth struts of a second cell in the first row circumferentially adjacent the first cell, the first and second struts being joined to the third and fourth struts via a strut connector; and/or
a single suture attaching both the first end of the first prosthetic leaflet and the first end of the second prosthetic leaflet to the “X”-shaped intersection, the single suture having a leading end and a trailing end; and/or
the leading end of the suture is secured to the trailing end of the suture in a knot; and/or
the knot is positioned between the first cell and the second cell; and/or
the stent includes an intermediate circumferential row of cells positioned between the first row and the second row; and/or
the first strut intersection is an “X”-shaped intersection formed by four struts, the four struts including first and second struts of a first cell in the intermediate row, and third and fourth struts of a second cell in the intermediate row circumferentially adjacent the first cell, the first and second struts being joined to the third and fourth struts via a strut connector; and/or
the first strut also forms a portion of a third cell in the first row, and the third strut also forms a portion of a fourth cell in the first row; and/or
a single suture attaching both the first end of the first prosthetic leaflet and the first end of the second prosthetic leaflet to the “X”-shaped intersection, the single suture having a leading end and a trailing end; and/or
the leading end of the suture is secured to the trailing end of the suture in a knot; and/or
the knot is positioned between the second strut and the fourth strut; and/or
the first prosthetic leaflet has a second end attached directly to a second one of the strut intersections, and the second prosthetic leaflet has a second end attached directly to the second strut intersection; and/or
the first strut intersection has a first position on the stent and the second strut intersection has a second position on the stent, the first position being diametrically opposed to the second position.
Although the invention herein has been described with reference to particular embodiments, it is to be understood that these embodiments are merely illustrative of the principles and applications of the present invention. It is therefore to be understood that numerous modifications may be made to the illustrative embodiments and that other arrangements may be devised without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims. It will be appreciated that the various dependent claims and the features set forth therein can be combined in different ways than presented in the initial claims. It will also be appreciated that the features described in connection with individual embodiments may be shared with others of the described embodiments.
This application claims the benefit of the filing date of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/733,902 filed Sep. 20, 2018, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3657744 | Ersek | Apr 1972 | A |
4275469 | Gabbay | Jun 1981 | A |
4491986 | Gabbay | Jan 1985 | A |
4759758 | Gabbay | Jul 1988 | A |
4878906 | Lindemann et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4922905 | Strecker | May 1990 | A |
4994077 | Dobben | Feb 1991 | A |
5411552 | Andersen et al. | May 1995 | A |
5415664 | Pinchuk | May 1995 | A |
5480423 | Ravenscroft et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5843167 | Dwyer et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5855601 | Bessler et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5935163 | Gabbay | Aug 1999 | A |
5961549 | Nguyen et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6045576 | Starr et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6077297 | Robinson et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6083257 | Taylor et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6090140 | Gabbay | Jul 2000 | A |
6214036 | Letendre et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6264691 | Gabbay | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6267783 | Letendre et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6368348 | Gabbay | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6419695 | Gabbay | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6458153 | Bailey et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6468660 | Ogle et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6488702 | Besselink | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6517576 | Gabbay | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6533810 | Hankh et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6582464 | Gabbay | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6610088 | Gabbay | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6623518 | Thompson et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6652578 | Bailey et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6685625 | Gabbay | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6716244 | Klaco | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6719789 | Cox | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6730118 | Spenser et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6783556 | Gabbay | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6790230 | Beyersdorf et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6814746 | Thompson et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6830584 | Seguin | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6869444 | Gabbay | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6893460 | Spenser et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6908481 | Cribier | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6951573 | Dilling | Oct 2005 | B1 |
7018406 | Seguin et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7025780 | Gabbay | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7137184 | Schreck | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7160322 | Gabbay | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7195641 | Palmaz et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7247167 | Gabbay | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7267686 | DiMatteo et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7276078 | Spenser et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7311730 | Gabbay | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7320704 | Lashinski et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7329278 | Seguin et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7374573 | Gabbay | May 2008 | B2 |
7381218 | Schreck | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7381219 | Salahieh et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7452371 | Pavcnik et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7510572 | Gabbay | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7510575 | Spenser et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7524331 | Birdsall | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7534261 | Friedman | May 2009 | B2 |
RE40816 | Taylor et al. | Jun 2009 | E |
7585321 | Cribier | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7628805 | Spenser et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7682390 | Seguin | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7708775 | Rowe et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7731742 | Schlick et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7748389 | Salahieh et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7780725 | Haug et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7799069 | Bailey et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7803185 | Gabbay | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7824442 | Salahieh et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7837727 | Goetz et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7846203 | Cribier | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7846204 | Letac et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7857845 | Stacchino et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7892281 | Seguin et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7914569 | Nguyen et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7959666 | Salahieh et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7959672 | Salahieh et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7972378 | Tabor et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7988724 | Salahieh et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
7993394 | Hariton et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8016877 | Seguin et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
D648854 | Braido | Nov 2011 | S |
8048153 | Salahieh et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8052741 | Bruszewski et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8052749 | Salahieh et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8052750 | Tuval et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8062355 | Figulla et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8075611 | Millwee et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
D652926 | Braido | Jan 2012 | S |
D652927 | Braido et al. | Jan 2012 | S |
D653341 | Braido et al. | Jan 2012 | S |
D653342 | Braido et al. | Jan 2012 | S |
D653343 | Ness et al. | Jan 2012 | S |
D654169 | Braido | Feb 2012 | S |
D654170 | Braido et al. | Feb 2012 | S |
8137398 | Tuval et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8142497 | Friedman | Mar 2012 | B2 |
D660432 | Braido | May 2012 | S |
D660433 | Braido et al. | May 2012 | S |
D660967 | Braido et al. | May 2012 | S |
8182528 | Salahieh et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8221493 | Boyle et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8230717 | Matonick | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8231670 | Salahieh et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8252051 | Chau et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8308798 | Pintor et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8313525 | Tuval et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8323335 | Rowe et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8323336 | Hill et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8343213 | Salahieh et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8348995 | Tuval et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8348996 | Tuval et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8348998 | Pintor et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8366769 | Huynh et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8403983 | Quadri et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8408214 | Spenser | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8414643 | Tuval et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8425593 | Braido et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8449599 | Chau et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8449604 | Moaddeb et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
D684692 | Braido | Jun 2013 | S |
8454686 | Alkhatib | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8500798 | Rowe et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8568474 | Yeung et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8579962 | Salahieh et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8579966 | Seguin et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8585755 | Chau et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8591575 | Cribier | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8597349 | Alkhatib | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8603159 | Seguin et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8603160 | Salahieh et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8613765 | Bonhoeffer et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8623074 | Ryan | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8652204 | Quill et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8663322 | Keranen | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8668733 | Haug et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8685080 | White | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8728154 | Alkhatib | May 2014 | B2 |
8747459 | Nguyen et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8764820 | Dehdashtian et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8795357 | Yohanan et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8801776 | House et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8808356 | Braido et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8828078 | Salahieh et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8834563 | Righini | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8840661 | Manasse | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8840663 | Salahieh et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8876894 | Tuval et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8876895 | Tuval et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8940040 | Shahriari | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8945209 | Bonyuet et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8961595 | Alkhatib | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8974523 | Thill et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8974524 | Yeung et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
20020036220 | Gabbay | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20030023303 | Palmaz et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030050694 | Yang et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030130726 | Thorpe et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040049262 | Obermiller et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040093075 | Kuehne | May 2004 | A1 |
20040111111 | Lin | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040210304 | Seguin et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040260389 | Case et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050096726 | Sequin et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050137682 | Justino | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137695 | Salahieh et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137697 | Salahieh et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050203605 | Dolan | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050240200 | Bergheim | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050256566 | Gabbay | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060008497 | Gabbay | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060074484 | Huber | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060122692 | Gilad et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060149360 | Schwammenthal et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161249 | Realyvasquez et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060173532 | Flagle et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060178740 | Stacchino et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195180 | Kheradvar et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060206202 | Bonhoeffer et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060241744 | Beith | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060259120 | Vongphakdy et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259137 | Artof et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060265056 | Nguyen et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060276813 | Greenberg | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060276874 | Wilson et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070010876 | Salahieh et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070027534 | Bergheim et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043435 | Seguin et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070055358 | Krolik et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070067029 | Gabbay | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070093890 | Eliasen et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070100435 | Case et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118210 | Pinchuk | May 2007 | A1 |
20070213813 | Von Segesser et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070233228 | Eberhardt et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070244545 | Birdsall et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070244552 | Salahieh et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070288087 | Fearnot et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080021552 | Gabbay | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080039934 | Styrc | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080071369 | Tuval et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080082164 | Friedman | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080097595 | Gabbay | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080114452 | Gabbay | May 2008 | A1 |
20080125853 | Bailey et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080140189 | Nguyen et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147183 | Styrc | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080154355 | Benichou et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080154356 | Obermiller et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080243245 | Thambar et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080255662 | Stacchino et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080262602 | Wilk et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080269879 | Sathe et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090099653 | Suri et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090112309 | Jaramillo et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090138079 | Tuval et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090254175 | Quijano et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090276027 | Glynn | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100004740 | Seguin et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100036484 | Hariton et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100049306 | House et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100087907 | Lattouf | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100131055 | Case et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100168778 | Braido | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100168839 | Braido et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100168844 | Toomes et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100185277 | Braido et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100191326 | Alkhatib | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100204781 | Alkhatib | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100204785 | Alkhatib | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100217382 | Chau et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100234940 | Dolan | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100249911 | Alkhatib | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100249923 | Alkhatib et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100286768 | Alkhatib | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100298931 | Quadri et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110029072 | Gabbay | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110054466 | Rothstein et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110098800 | Braido et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110098802 | Braido et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110137397 | Chau et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110172765 | Nguyen et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110208283 | Rust | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110264206 | Tabor | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120035722 | Tuval | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120078347 | Braido et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120101572 | Kovalsky et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120123529 | Levi et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120303116 | Gorman, III et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130261740 | Eberhardt et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130274873 | Delaloye et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140121763 | Duffy et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140155997 | Braido | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140214159 | Vidlund et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140228946 | Chau et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140303719 | Cox et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140324164 | Gross et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140343671 | Yohanan et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140350668 | Delaloye et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140350669 | Gillespie et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150073545 | Braido | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150127100 | Braido | May 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19857887 | Jul 2000 | DE |
10121210 | Nov 2005 | DE |
102005003632 | Aug 2006 | DE |
202008009610 | Dec 2008 | DE |
0850607 | Jul 1998 | EP |
1000590 | May 2000 | EP |
1584306 | Oct 2005 | EP |
1598031 | Nov 2005 | EP |
1360942 | Dec 2005 | EP |
1926455 | Jun 2008 | EP |
2537487 | Dec 2012 | EP |
2850008 | Jul 2004 | FR |
2847800 | Oct 2005 | FR |
9117720 | Nov 1991 | WO |
9716133 | May 1997 | WO |
9832412 | Jul 1998 | WO |
9913801 | Mar 1999 | WO |
01028459 | Apr 2001 | WO |
2001049213 | Jul 2001 | WO |
0154625 | Aug 2001 | WO |
01056500 | Aug 2001 | WO |
0176510 | Oct 2001 | WO |
2002036048 | May 2002 | WO |
0247575 | Jun 2002 | WO |
02067782 | Sep 2002 | WO |
03047468 | Jun 2003 | WO |
2005070343 | Aug 2005 | WO |
06073626 | Jul 2006 | WO |
07071436 | Jun 2007 | WO |
08070797 | Jun 2008 | WO |
10008548 | Jan 2010 | WO |
2010008549 | Jan 2010 | WO |
2010096176 | Aug 2010 | WO |
2010098857 | Sep 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report including the Written Opinion from Application No. PCT/US2019/050724 dated Nov. 13, 2019, 11 pages. |
“Catheter-Implanted Prosthetic Heart Valves: Transluminal Catheter Implantation of a New Expandable Artificial Heart Valve in the Descending Thoracic Aorta In Isolated Vessels and Closed Chest Pigs”, Knudsen et al., The International Journal of Artificial Organs, vol. 16, No. 5, May 1993, pp. 253-262 (profiled at 1,798,509). |
“Closed Heart Surgery: Back to the Future”, Samuel V. Lichtenstein, The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 131, No. 5, May 2006, pp. 941-943. (profiled at 5635963). |
“Direct-Access Valve Replacement”, Christoph H. Huber, et al., Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 46, No. 2, (Jul. 19, 2005). (profiled at 3,729,371). |
“Minimally invasive cardiac surgery”, M. J. Mack, Surgical Endoscopy, 2006, 20:S488-S492, DOI: 10.1007/s00464-006-0110-8 (presented Mar. 23, 2006) (profiled at 3,717,330). |
“Percutaneous Aortic Valve Implantation Retrograde From the Femoral Artery”, John G. Webb et al., Circulation, 2006; 113:842-850 (Feb. 6, 2006). (profiled at 3,827,967). |
“Percutaneous Aortic Valve Replacement: Resection Before Implantation”, Quaden, Rene et al., European J. of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, vol. 27, No. 5, May 2005, pp. 836-840 (profiled at 1,039,678). |
“Transapical aortic valve implantation: an animal feasibility study”; Todd M. Dewey et al., The annals of thoracic surgery 2006; 82: 110-6 (Feb. 13, 2006). (profiled at 3,717,325). |
“Transapical Approach for Sutureless Stent-Fixed Aortic Valve Implantation: Experimental Results”, Th. Walther et al., European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, vol. 29, No. 5, May 2006, pp. 703-708. (profiled at 3,717,332). |
“Transapical Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Humans”, Samuel V. Lichtenstein et al., Circulation. 2006; 114: 591-596 (Jul. 31, 2006) (profiled at 3,831,615). |
“Transcatheter Umbrella Closure of Valvular and Paravalvular Leaks”, Hourihan et al., Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 20, No. 6, Nov. 1992, pp. 1371-1377. |
“Transluminal Aortic Valve Placement. A Feasability Study with a Newly Designed Collapsible Aortic Valve”, Moazami et al., ASAIO Journal, vol. 42, No. 5, 1996, pp. M381-M385 (profiled at 1,798,531). |
“Transluminal Catheter Implanted Prosthetic Heart Valves”, Andersen, H. R., International Journal of Angiology, vol. 7, No. 2, Mar. 1998, pp. 102-106 (profiled at 1,798,541). |
“Transluminal Implantation of Artificial Heart Valves”, Andersen, H. R., et al., European Heart Journal, vol. 13, No. 5, May 1992, pp. 704-708 (profiled at 1,805,328). |
Buellesfeld et al., “Treatment of Paravalvular Leaks Through Inverventional Techniques”, Multimedia Manual of Cardithoracic Surgery, Department of Cardiology, Ben University Hospital, Jan. 2011. |
De Cicco, et al., “Aortic Valve Periprosthetic Leakage: Anatomic Observations and Surgical Results”, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, vol. 79, No. 5, May 2005, pp. 1480-1485. |
Gössl and Rihal, “Percutaneous Treatment of Aortic and Mitral Valve Paravalvular Regurgitation”, Current Cardiology Reports, vol. 15, No. 8, Aug. 2013, pp. 1-8. |
Heat Advisor, “Heart repairs without surgery. Minimally invasive procedures aim to correct valve leakage”, Sep. 2004, PubMed ID 15586429. |
Is It Reasonable to Treat All Calcified Stenotic Aortic Valves With a Valved Stent?, 579-584, Zegdi, Rachid, MD, PhD et al., J. of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 51, No. 5, Feb. 5, 2008 (profiled at 1,039,679). |
Muñoz, Daniel Rodríguez, Carla Lázaro Rivera, and José Luis Zamorano Gómez, “Guidance of Treatment of Perivalvular Prosthetic Leaks”, Current Cardiology Reports, vol. 16, No. 1, Nov. 2013, pp. 1-6. |
Rohde, I., Masch, J.-M., Theisen-Kunde, D., Marczynski-Bühlow, M., Bombien Quaden, R., Lutter, G. and Brinkmann, R., “Resection of Calcified Aortic Heart Leaflets In Vitro by Q-Switched 2?μm Microsecond Laser Radiation”, Journal of Cardiac Surgery, vol. 30, No. 2, Feb. 2015, pp. 157-162. doi: 10.1111/jocs.12481. |
Ruiz, Carlos, Overview of PRE-CE Mark Transcatheter Aortic Valve Technologies, Euro PCR (powerpoint profiled at 1,389,233)—dated May 25, 2010? |
Swiatkiewicz et al., “Percutaneous Closure of Mitral Perivalvular Leak”, Kardiologia Polska, vol. 67, No. 7, 2009, pp. 762-764. |
Transcatheter Valve Repair, Hijazi et al., CRC Press, Jan. 2006, pp. 165-186. (profiled at 4,174,242). |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/375,243—Braido, et al., U.S. Appl. No. 29/375,243, filed Sep. 20, 2010, titled “Surgical Stent Assembly”. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200093590 A1 | Mar 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62733902 | Sep 2018 | US |