The present disclosure relates to reciprocating floor slat conveyor systems.
Reciprocating floor slat conveyor systems are well-known. These systems are often built into the floors of truck trailers that haul materials in bulk.
The typical reciprocating floor slat conveyor system consists of multiple, bearing mounted, parallel floor slats that are driven back-and-forth in a reciprocating action. The action or motion of the floor slats are typically driven in “stages” as follows: First, in the case of truck trailers, all of the slats are moved in one direction, at the same time. This stage moves the load on the floor a short distance toward the exit end of the trailer. Then, a lesser number of slats are retracted, or returned, in the opposite direction (typically, in stages of one-third of the slats at a time). Because of the fewer number of moving slats involved in the return stage, the greater total friction between the load and the larger number of nonmoving slats allows the moving slats in the return stage to slide underneath the load, without moving the load backward.
Returning one-third of the slats at a time, in three separate return stages, brings all of the slats to the original start position, with the load staying in place during the return stages. Once all of the slats return, then the sequence repeats itself, with all of the slats moving, once again, toward the exit end of the trailer. This, in turn, also moves the load another short distance toward and out from the exit end of the trailer. Repetitive cycling of the slats in stages in the manner just described causes the load to be inched out from the trailer.
There is a specialized market for conveyors like the above. These systems have become a substitute for and have replaced hydraulic dump lifts for certain kinds of applications. From the standpoint of historical development, these kinds of conveyors may have been initially developed to haul bulk silage for cattle feed and similar kinds of bulk materials. Since then, they have been adapted for many other uses, such as the garbage hauling markets; and certain kinds of specialized designs have been developed that allow trucks with these conveyors to haul rock, gravel, or asphalt.
As a consequence of different market needs, many different kinds of floor slat configurations have been designed over the years to adapt reciprocating floor slat conveyors to different hauling scenarios. The floor slats themselves are usually made from aluminum, for reasons relating to weight (i.e., light weight systems are desirable for truck trailers), and due to manufacturing and installation considerations. Long lengths are required for a typical floor slat (generally corresponding to the length of a trailer). Aluminum slats can be mass produced by extrusion.
For reasons relating to the abrasive wear caused by certain kinds of loads, there has been a need to develop a successful steel floor slat system in lieu of aluminum slats. Steel slats have been used in the past in combination with aluminum slat parts. For example, spaced-apart, inverted “V”-shaped reciprocating slats have been made of steel and used in combination with spaced-apart “fixed” slats made of aluminum. This system has been used to haul certain kinds of heavy bulk material that create loading impacts and abrasive wear on the moving slats—large rock would be an example. In this design, the “moving” steel slats provide better wear characteristics for the load-carrying surfaces. They are spaced from each other a certain distance and ride on bearings that are supported by the underlying “fixed” aluminum slats. This design, as a whole, creates peaks and valleys from one side of the trailer to the other side, which is a function of the “V” shape.
The use of steel in the “V” configuration is a better design relative to all-aluminum systems for certain kinds of specialized hauling applications. However, although the design works well for certain hauling applications, it does not provide a conveyor floor surface that can be driven on with a forklift. This is a drawback that limits the use of trailers that have this type of floor configuration. In other words, the trailer tends to be used “one way” and is empty on the return.
Truck haulers would like a “steel” floor slat system that can handle the specialized loads carried by a “V”-shaped steel slat system, but one that also provides a flat conveyor floor surface, from side-to-side, so that a forklift can be driven onto the trailer's floor when empty. This would allow the same trailer to be used to haul heavy bulk materials in one direction, but after unloading, the trailer can be loaded by a forklift in a conventional way with palletized loads, if desired. This is more utilitarian and allows the trailer to be used to generate revenue on the back-haul, rather than come back empty.
For the above reason, and others discussed below, there has been a long felt need for an “all steel” reciprocating floor system that can provide multiple uses. Because of the difficulty of manufacturing a suitable steel slat system, as of yet, the reciprocating floor slat industry has been unable to create a commercially viable “all-steel” floor slat design that can provide a flat, driveable surface inside the trailer.
The foregoing and other features will be better understood upon review of the drawings and description that follows.
The several embodiments described and illustrated in this specification include a roll-formed slat that may provide a load-carrying surface, or in the alternative, may have an additional strip of hardened steel attached above the roll-formed slat that provides the load bearing surface. Regardless, the roll-formed steel slat is intended to be used in a reciprocating floor slat conveyor system.
The roll-formed slat is formed from a strip of steel via a roll-forming process. The slat is formed to have at least an upper load-carrying surface, or upper surface portion, as well as a pair of side legs, one on each side of the upper load-carrying surface. Each side leg depends downwardly and laterally inwardly relative to the upper load-carrying surface. Each side leg also terminates in the shape or form of a laterally inwardly directed foot portion.
The foot portion of one side leg is vertically offset relative to the foot portion of the other side leg, in order to create a “hold-down” function relative to supporting bearings. The supporting bearings provide slidable support surfaces for back-and-forth reciprocating movement of the slat.
The purpose of the “hold-down” function is to allow the slat to capture a bearing edge in a manner so that the floor slat cannot rise substantially while the slat reciprocates. The purpose of the “hold-down” function is to impede bulk materials, making up the load (which is a typical use of reciprocating conveyors), from working downward and between different reciprocating slats. One foot portion might provide a “hold-down” function while the other foot portion (which can be vertically offset below the other one) may provide a supporting function, although design variables may dictate different arrangements.
Independent of the vertically offset feet described above, the roll-formed slat is also formed to have an upper load-carrying surface with a pair of raised stiffening beads or raised side regions. The raised stiffening beads create a valley region between the beads that has a certain depth. An attachment plate (which is used to attach the steel slat to an underlying member) rests flush on the upper load-carrying surface, between the raised stiffening beads. The attachment plate has a vertical thickness, or height, that is no greater than the height of the raised stiffening beads.
The above summary is not intended to limit the claiming of different embodiments described herein.
In the drawings, like reference numerals and letters refer to like parts throughout the various views, and wherein:
Referring to the drawings, and first to
Referring to
Returning to
The top slat portion 15 (or “top slat”) provides the load bearing surface. It can be made from a strip of hardened steel, such as steel that is marketed under Hardox™ or Domex™ trademarks. As just mentioned, the top slat 15 is not roll-formed and, as can be seen in
Each top slat 15 is suitably connected to the lower slat portion 16. The connection between the two slat portions 15, 16 can be made in many different ways, i.e., by spot welding, rivets, bolts, or other fasteners. An adhesive connection may also be possible. The point is: the top slat 15 provides a hardened steel surface that is connected to the lower slat portion 16 by any viable means that can make the needed structural connection.
The lower slat portion 16 is also made of steel, but it is a “milder” form of steel that can be roll-formed. “Mild” steel is a known term of art.
The lower slat portion 16 is made from a single strip of mild steel that is dimensioned to be bent into the configuration shown in
The slat configuration(s) 14 (i.e., the combination of portions 15 and 16) reciprocate back and forth on a bearing (indicated generally by arrow 46) with the inside surface 48 of the lower slat portion 16 riding on the top horizontal surface 50 of the bearing (see right-hand slat 14 in
In the embodiment in
It is to be appreciated that it is desired to have bearing edge 44 in close sliding contact with slat foot 26, with no gap or “slop” between the two surfaces. It is likely that the shape or angles of these surfaces will be made so that there is resistance to any upward movement when these components are installed. Moreover, it may be preferred to design bearing 46 so that is causes positive hold-down forces on each slat 14. In other words, “positive” hold-down” means that the slat and bearing combination are assembled to minimize upward movement of the slat as it reciprocates.
On the other lateral side of the lower slat portion 16, the foot 28 rests on a lower bearing flange 52. As can be seen, in this specific embodiment, there is no hold-down function because of a gap 54 (see general arrow 54 vis-à-vis the right-hand slat configuration 14 in
It is to be appreciated, at this point, that the “all-steel” nature of the design disclosed here provides certain advantages over aluminum slats. One advantage is that roll-forming allows the lower slat portions 16 to have a uniform wall thickness (indicated generally by arrows 38 in
Steel also has a lower coefficient of friction, which means it should be easier to drive a steel slat back and forth on a bearing surface relative to a similar part that is made from aluminum. This provides efficiencies in that less power may be required to drive a bearing-mounted “all-steel” slat.
Steel slats also have a better degree of wear when one steel surface is sliding against another. With respect to this point, and referring now to the right-hand side of
Referring now to the right-hand side of
Before moving on to the other slat configurations illustrated in the drawings, it is worthwhile to discuss the roll-forming tooling needed to create the slats. Roll-forming enables slat profiles to be made out of steel, in the forms illustrated in
Referring again to
Using roll-forming, the configuration illustrated in the various Figs. can be made from relatively thin strips of mild steel (i.e., 16 or 18 gauge). The inner edges 78, 80 of the lateral feet 26, 28 may also be suitable for folding, in the manner illustrated in
The slats illustrated in
With respect to the steel recess 70 described above, in particular, aluminum slats have been made with integrated seal recesses that are similar in shape and function. However, the aluminum slats are extruded and have required non-uniform material thickness in certain areas of the slat. This is believed to be an issue in the region of the recess. With roll-formed steel slats, wall thickness remains the same through the various bends that are created during the roll-forming process.
Roll-forming also enables slat profiles to be made out of steel in various cross-sectional configurations, as illustrated at 82, 84, 86, 88, 90 in the lower half of
Typically, roll-forming is a continuous bending operation that involves passing a long strip of steel through sets of rollers in a continuous line, with different sets incrementally making part of a bend, until the final cross-sectional shape is achieved. This allows for optimizing strip thickness while creating the variety of cross-sectional profiles disclosed here, although different profiles require a dedicated set of roll tools to create the desired final shape.
The design of the rolls may start with what is called a “flower pattern” that defines a sequence of sections of the final cross-section, each section corresponding to roll sets for making the desired bend. It is not believed that anyone in the reciprocating floor conveyor industry has conceived of the idea of using roll sets and roll-forming as a method of manufacturing an all-steel floor slat system.
Referring now to
In current reciprocating conveyor floor systems (that use aluminum floor slats), the floor slats are pre-drilled and countersunk for a fastener (e.g., a “bolt”). The fastener extends through the thickness of the aluminum slat and has a threaded end that is connected, via a nut, to a transverse drive beam. The drive beam is moved back and forth, typically by a hydraulic cylinder. The fastener/bolt connection between the drive beam and the slat transfers the drive force from the hydraulic cylinder to the slat and causes the slat to move along with the drive beam. The fastener/bolt connection just described also represents a localized region on the slat where the slat material is subject to high stress and high wear because the connection point represents a zone for high force transfer.
Aluminum slats can be extruded with different thicknesses and/or variability in thickness when looking at a slat's cross-section. In other words, the aluminum extrusion process permits a thickening of the slat material in the region where the above bolt connection is made, for addressing the localized force transfer.
An “all-steel” floor slat will be connected to transverse drive members in generally the same way as described above. However, the all-steel slats are made via a roll-forming process from a single, uniform strip of steel that does not vary in thickness. With this method, there is no way to thicken steel wall thickness at the location of the bolt connections during the course of manufacturing the slat.
In order to address the above attachment problem in an all-steel slat, and referring to
The attachment plate 100 shown in
The
The thickness of the steel attachment plate 100 may be a variable, although it is likely to fill the vertical heights of the valleys 126, 128 so that all of the attachment plates 100, for all of the slats, from one lateral side of the conveyor to the other (not shown) will present a substantially flush floor surface.
The number of fasteners used in any one attachment plate 100 may be a variable. Although two fasteners 110, 112 are illustrated in
The foregoing description is not intended to limit the scope of patent coverage. The scope of patent coverage is to be limited only by the patent claims allowed by the customs of local law, the interpretation of which is to be made in accordance with the doctrines of patent claim interpretation for the applicable jurisdiction.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2973856 | Brooks | Mar 1961 | A |
4492303 | Foster | Jan 1985 | A |
RE33196 | Foster | Apr 1990 | E |
5063981 | Jonkka | Nov 1991 | A |
5228556 | Quaeck | Jul 1993 | A |
5355994 | Foster | Oct 1994 | A |
5655845 | Foster | Aug 1997 | A |
6000530 | Foster | Dec 1999 | A |
6257396 | Quaeck | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6575293 | Foster | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6651806 | Hallstrom | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6763933 | Wilkens | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6848569 | Foster | Feb 2005 | B1 |
7083041 | Foster | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7152729 | Wilkens | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7243780 | Foster | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7461738 | Delmarter | Dec 2008 | B1 |
8083052 | Drago | Dec 2011 | B2 |
9278812 | Feigner | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9963298 | Jackson | May 2018 | B2 |
9969559 | Jackson | May 2018 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2162182 | May 1997 | CA |
0638758 | Feb 1995 | EP |
1428775 | Jul 2007 | EP |
1865120 | Dec 2007 | EP |
2330062 | Jun 2011 | EP |
2766905 | Feb 1999 | FR |
1041004 | Oct 2016 | NL |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180257869 A1 | Sep 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62250249 | Nov 2015 | US | |
62198596 | Jul 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15342602 | Nov 2016 | US |
Child | 15979258 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15224196 | Jul 2016 | US |
Child | 15342602 | US |