The present invention represents an improvement upon the subjects matter of the above-referenced U.S. Pat. No. 7,536,883 issued May 26, 2009 to Tien-Kao Liu entitled VANDAL-RESISTANT COMBINATION PADLOCK.
In particular, the present invention relates to strong, attack resistant, corrosion resistant inserts of novel configuration for use within combination operated padlocks, and to the use of inserts of novel configuration for strengthening and providing attack resistant and corrosion resistant improvements in padlocks of the type having a shackle that is released by turning indicia carrying wheels or dials to set a combination that permits a lever-like blocking member (or “rocking claw” as it is sometimes called) to pivot within an open area of a padlock's housing carried frame (i.e., within a so-called “frame defined space”). The dials extend into the frame defined space and interact with at least one operating component of the padlock that pivots within the frame defined space. In preferred practice the insert has two substantially identical question-mark-shaped tines that extend toward and between different adjacent pairs of the dials.
The referenced Liu patent discloses a chunky, cast zinc metal insert intended to inhabit and to substantially fill otherwise unused territory within a “frame defined space” of a combination operated padlock. The Liu insert is configured to closely embrace portions of an operating component that moves in a pivotal manner within the frame defined space. In essence, the insert of Liu is intended to extend so near to major portions of the movable operating component as to closely sandwich these portions in efforts to protect selected operating components of the padlock from damage due to an application of external force, or due to manipulation of operating components by using small tools inserted alongside dials of the padlock to defeat and open the padlock.
The present invention provides a much differently configured insert from that disclosed in the patent of Liu. Inserts embodying the preferred practice of the present invention are formed as brass stampings that are openly configured and designed to extend near to, without serving to closely sandwich, portions of the operating component that is supported by, and is pivotally movable within, the frame of a combination operated padlock.
In preferred practice, inserts that embody features of the present invention are formed from corrosion resistant brass, as stampings, and are designed to be of uniform thickness having a configuration that fits cleverly around and among operating components of the padlock to prevent the operating components from being manipulated to effect an unauthorized unlocking of the padlock. The insert preferably also serves to strengthen the padlock, thereby enhancing its resistance to forceful attack.
More particularly, the invention relates to improvements in dial operated combination padlocks that have evolved from padlocks of the type disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,853,868 and 3,419,893 issued to Carl A. Valstrom, U.S. Pat. No. 3,817,063 issued to Merton S. Williams and, more recently, the referenced Liu patent. The Valstromm, Williams and Liu patents identified above are referred to later herein as the “Combination Padlock Patents.” These and other patents disclose padlocks that utilize similarly configured frame supported sub-assemblies have shaft-supported dials which extend into so-called “frame defined spaces” wherein movable operating components known as “blocking members” pivot to selectively permit and prevent unlocking of U-shaped shackles of the padlocks in response to a turning of dials to set combinations that enable the blocking members to move in a way that causes the hardened steel shackles of the padlocks to unlock and open.
Although the aforementioned Williams patent discloses an improved padlock construction having a so-called “filler block” installed in a thin upper end region of a space defined by a frame of the padlock's control assembly, the Williams filler block is quite thin, is severely notched thereby weakening its strength at a central location, has a generally trapezoidal shape that extends into engagement with only small, spaced portions of the frame, and leaves open and unoccupied a sizable region or territory within the frame-defined space of the padlock—a space into which small tools and other foreign objects can be inserted if efforts are made to defeat the operation of the lock by manipulation, bending and/or breakage of components of the padlock—a space within which portions of the frame, dials, shaft, lever-like blocking member or other operating components can be deformed or displaced if subjected to external pressure or pounding in attempts to defeat the padlock by component breakage, deformation or displacement.
Although the presence of the thin, trapezoidal shaped filler block disclosed in the Williams patent does help to reinforce and rigidify an upper end region of the frame located a substantial distance from the dials and shaft that supports the dials, the remotely located filler block provides no direct support or reinforcement to the end region of the frame where the dials and the shaft are located, and does little to confine the lever-like blocking member or other components so they are permitted to move only within protected, permitted zones of movement.
Any benefit obtained by use of the Williams filler block can be lost if the filler block should crack, deform or break either as the result of its being severely centrally notched to accommodate blocking member movement, or due to its being provided with a sizable hole at the same central location as the notch—a hole into which a drive pin or threaded screw is forcibly driven at the conclusion of the padlock's assembly procedure to hold components of the padlock in assembled relationship.
Liu recognized that the small trapezoidal-shaped filler block of Williams could be improved upon, and that a significant amount of unoccupied territory within the frame defined space found in combination operated padlocks of the type disclosed in the Williams patent remains open and might be utilized disadvantageously during efforts to pry, pick, break or manipulate operating components of the padlock. Liu also recognized that the thin, trapezoidal-shaped filler block of Williams does nothing to directly support the dials or the shaft, or to confine movements of such components as the dials and the blocking member to restricted zones within which these components should be confined and permitted to move, or to prevent these components from being deformed or displaced to defeat operation of the padlock. Liu therefore provided a significantly larger filler block (which Liu referred to as a “claw mount”) shown in
One aspect of the present invention resides in the provision of a strong, corrosion resistant insert of novel and open configuration designed to improve upon the attack resistant inserts proposed by Liu and others. Another aspect of the present invention resides in the provision of combination operated padlocks of enhanced corrosion and attack resistance that are strengthened by the inclusion of novel inserts that simplify the assembly of the padlocks during manufacture—padlocks that incorporate inserts which are strong, stiff and rigid to resist padlock deformation, that function nicely to withstand applications of manual force, and that resist the use of small tools and the like such as may be inserted through narrow openings adjacent the padlock's dials in an effort to manipulate and/or deform operating components during efforts to defeat and open the padlocks.
Unlike the corrodible die-cast zinc insert of Liu, inserts that embody the preferred practice of the present invention are preferably formed entirely of corrosion resistant brass. Inasmuch as most other major components of padlocks embodying the preferred practice of the present invention also are formed of corrosion resistant brass, padlocks that embody the preferred practice of the present invention provide a much greater resistance to corrosion than is provided by padlocks that employ the corrodible die-cast zinc insert of Liu.
Unlike the relatively massive, chunky and complexly configured, die-cast insert of Liu, inserts that embody the preferred practice of the present invention are preferably formed of stamped brass that is configured to provide a relatively open feel, extending only where needed to enhance strength and embellish the resulting padlock's resistance to attack. In preferred practice, the insert is formed as a one-piece stamping that is made by folding a single piece of brass plate stock that has first been cut to provide a shape which will yield an insert of desired configuration when folded during a stamping process.
Unlike the bulky die-cast zinc insert of Liu that sandwiches a pivotal blocking member so closely as to potentially cause problems if expansive corrosion should develop on the zinc metal insert itself, inserts that embody the preferred practice of the present invention reside primarily along only a front side of the pivotally movable blocking member, thereby avoiding problems caused by the Liu insert's narrow throat that effectively cuddles and provides a close front-and-rear sandwiching of major portions of the pivotal blocking member.
Unlike the complexly configured insert of Liu which requires manual insertion of a combination lock's pivotal blocking member into confines of a narrow throat of the insert before the insert itself must actually be installed as a subassembly in a frame-defined space of the padlock, the simple, openly configured insert that embodies the preferred practice of the present invention is designed to merely be dropped into the padlock's frame ahead of when the padlock's pivotally blocking member also is dropped into the frame—which very significantly simplifies the assembly of padlocks that include a corrosion and attack resistant insert. Nothing about the insert of the present invention slows or impedes the assembly of the improved padlock. Indeed, assembly of the padlocks that embody features of the present invention is thoughtfully designed to proceed quickly.
Whereas the insert of Liu has both thick and thin portions, and relies on thin left and right formations of cast metal received in notches of the padlock's frame to hold the insert of Liu in place within the frame of a combination operated padlock, inserts that embody the preferred practice of the present invention use folded brass material of a uniform thickness extending throughout the construction of the insert—which imposes no need for thin projections that must be inserted into notches of the padlock's frame to hold the insert in place.
Whereas the insert of Liu provides a narrow, downwardly opening throat that closely sandwiches both of the opposed front and rear sides of the blocking member that pivots back and forth within the Liu inserts narrow throat, inserts embodying the preferred practice of the present invention extend primarily along only a front side of two small but strong, question-mark-shaped tines that perform their duty by extending toward and between different adjacent pairs of the dials which are used to set a combination to unlock the padlock.
A fuller understanding of the present invention may be had by referring to the description and claims that follow, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
In overview, the enlarged scale depiction provided by
Referring to
Referring still to
Referring still to
As can be seen in
Referring again to
Referring again to
The depending tines 121, 122, 123 of the Liu insert 100 are configured to extend toward and between adjacent pairs of the indicia-carrying dials 25 that may be turned about a supporting shaft 23 to set a combination that will unlock the Liu padlock as by positioning flats (one of which is indicated by a reference numeral 9 in
Because the downwardly opening throat 115 of the Liu insert 100 is narrow, and because the Liu insert 100 is formed from die-cast zinc (not from a more costly corrosion resistant metal such as brass), corrosion within the narrow throat 115 that inhibits proper pivotal movement of the blocking member 4 is a concern. Moreover, if small tools are inserted into the narrow interior throat 115 of the Liu insert 100, such tools may become jammed in the narrow throat 115, thereby inhibiting or debilitating proper operation of the Liu padlock.
The finger-like tines 121, 122, 123 are configured to extend into small spaces between the indicia-carrying dials 25. The close fit of the tines 121, 122, 123 and the dials 25, and the fact that the tines 121, 122, 123 and other portions of the Liu insert 100 are made from corrodible die-cast zinc metal (which is can enlarge in the presence of corrosion) also raises the concern that corrosion may impede and detract from proper operation of relatively movable operating components of the Liu padlock 299 shown in
Components of the improved padlock 301 shown in
Because the Liu insert 100 utilizes its narrow throat 115 to so closely surround or sandwich the blocking member 4, it is not possible to assemble the Liu padlock 299 by simply separately dropping the Liu insert 100 and the blocking member 4, in sequence, into the relatively wide frame-defined space 275 (
Because the elements of the sub-assembly 277 shown in
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring still to
Whereas much of its heft and “meat” of the Liu insert 100 was provided by a solid expanse of die-cast zinc that substantially filled otherwise unused and unoccupied territory within a frame-defined space 275 (
Whereas the Liu insert 100 defines a narrow, downwardly opening throat 115 that sandwiches portions of the blocking member 4 between the insert's front and rear portions, the insert 200 of the present invention has the pair of elongate tine formations 230 that extend horizontally (as depicted in
The two depending tines 225 of the insert 200 that extend beside the finger-like portions 43 of the blocking member 4 have lower end regions 221, 223 of diminished size. The two depending tines 225 extend toward and extend between different adjacent pairs of the indicia carrying dials 25 to stiffly and securely support the shaft 23 on which the dials 25 are carried, thereby rendering operating components (e.g., the shaft 23, the dials 25 and the blocking member 4) of the padlock 301 resistant to deformation by hammering and to other external forces that may be imposed on the padlock 301 in an effort to defeat its operation.
Referring to
Referring to
How the improved padlock 301 shown in
Recognized by the present invention is the fact that, in order to ensure that operating components of padlocks employing conventional sub-assemblies 280 such as is depicted in
Also recognized and put to use by the present invention is the fact that the shaft-mounted dials 25 (which are rotated to set the combination of a combination operated padlock) can be very adequately supported and kept in their required proper operational positions by using only two relatively small sized, corrosion-resistant brass tines 225 of question-mark-shape that are partly defined by from front wall formations 203, 204, providing a uniquely configured, open center insert formed of corrosion resistant brass, rather than by three corrodible wedge-shaped tines that depend from a back wall of a much more massive die-cast corrodible zinc metal insert such as is provided by Liu.
What the present invention further recognizes and utilizes is the fact that sandwiching a pivotally movable blocking member 4 between closely overlying front and rear walls of a relatively massive die-cast zinc metal insert member 100 is not necessary to the proper operation of the lever-like blocking member 4 when an open-center, corrosion resistant brass insert 200 of simpler configuration can offer very adequate deformation-resistant support and resistance to attack—an insert that significantly simplifies the assembly of the padlock by making it entirely unnecessary to stop the assembly of the padlock to form a sub-assembly of the blocking member 4 combined with the insert 100 that must be carefully inserted into the open area of a frame of a combination-operated padlock, as is required during assembly of the Liu padlock 299.
Interestingly, padlocks of the type addressed by the referenced “Combination Padlock Patents” can be made to function properly if the conventional frame-supported subassembly 280 shown in
In assembling the padlock 299 disclosed in the Liu patent, operating components are first assembled to provide a conventional frame-supported subassembly 280 such as is depicted in
In contradistinction, assembling the improved padlock 301 shown in
Although the invention has been described in its preferred form with a certain degree of particularity, it is understood that the present disclosure of the preferred form has been made only by way of example, and that numerous changes in the details of construction and the combination and arrangement of parts may be resorted to without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as hereinafter claimed. It is intended to protect whatever features of patentable novelty that exist in the invention disclosed.
The present application claims the benefit of the Aug. 25, 2011 filing date of Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/575,637 filed by Michael O. Misner entitled INSERT FOR PADLOCK, AND PADLOCK CONSTRUCTION WITH ATTACK RESISTANT DIAL-TYPE CONTROL ASSEMBLY. The present application is a continuation-in-part of Design Application Serial No. 29/395,880 filed Apr. 17, 2012 by Michael O. Misner entitled INSERT FOR PADLOCKS issued Jun. 26, 2012 as U.S. Pat. No. D-662,396, which was filed as a continuation-in-part of Design Application Serial No. 29/374,519 filed Aug. 25, 2011 by Michael O. Misner entitled INSERT FOR PADLOCKS. The attention of the Office also is directed to U.S. Pat. No. 7,536,883 issued May 26, 2009 filed May 6, 2008 as Utility application Ser. No. 12/149,635 by Tien-Kao Liu entitled VANDAL-RESISTANT COMBINATION PADLOCK. The disclosures of all of the above-identified patents and applications are incorporated herein by reference, in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2853868 | Vahlstrom | Sep 1958 | A |
3419893 | Vahlstrom | Dec 1968 | A |
3817063 | Williams | Jun 1974 | A |
4096718 | Michelman et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4290279 | Fish et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
6012309 | Liu | Jan 2000 | A |
6810698 | Weinraub | Nov 2004 | B2 |
7536883 | Liu | May 2009 | B1 |
D662396 | Misner | Jun 2012 | S |
D672632 | Misner | Dec 2012 | S |
20100192641 | Nave | Aug 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130047681 A1 | Feb 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61575637 | Aug 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 29395880 | Apr 2012 | US |
Child | 13507497 | US | |
Parent | 29374519 | Aug 2011 | US |
Child | 29395880 | US |