ATTAINING ACCESS TO COMPROMISED FRACTURED PRODUCTION REGIONS AT AN OILFIELD

Abstract

A technique for providing a fluid conduit between a main bore and a substantially non-producing region of a fracture at a horizontal section of the bore. The technique includes forming a micro-tunnel from a location of the bore adjacent the fracture. The micro-tunnel may be directed at the non-producing region with a angled deflector or in a steerable manner. Additionally, the well may be configured with micro-tunneling at the outset or retrofitted with micro-tunnels as a manner of restoring production.

Description

BACKGROUND

Exploring, drilling and completing hydrocarbon and other wells are generally complicated, time consuming and ultimately very expensive endeavors. As a result, over the years well architecture has become more sophisticated where appropriate in order to help enhance access to underground hydrocarbon reserves. For example, as opposed to wells of limited depth, it is not uncommon to find hydrocarbon wells exceeding 30,000 feet in depth. Furthermore, as opposed to remaining entirely vertical, today's hydrocarbon wells often include deviated or horizontal sections aimed at targeting particular underground reserves.

While such well depths and horizontal architecture may increase the likelihood of accessing underground hydrocarbons, other challenges are presented in terms of well management and the maximization of hydrocarbon recovery from such wells. For example, as is often the case with vertical wells, stimulation operations may take place to encourage production from lateral or horizontal regions of the well. This may be done in a zone by zone fashion with perforating applications followed by fracturing applications to form fractures deep into targeted regions of a formation.

For example, a perforating gun may be suspended at the end of coiled tubing that is advanced to within the horizontal section of the well. The gun may then be employed for forming perforations through the well casing and into the surrounding formation. Subsequent hydraulic fracturing applications may be undertaken in order to deliver proppant and further encourage hydrocarbon recovery from the formation via the formed fractures.

The above described manner and sequence of stimulating the well would be largely the same for a vertical well as it is for the horizontal well described. However, the results in terms of enhancing production may be quite different. That is, a horizontal well targeting a production region of a particular formation may be more efficient than a vertical well traversing the same region generally, the impact of stimulation is often less dramatic for the horizontal well. More specifically, stimulating with a standard amount of proppant, a two-fold production increase might be expected when stimulating a horizontal well. However, it would not be unexpected for a similar stimulation utilizing the same amount of proppant to result in a five to ten-fold increase in production efficiency when stimulating a vertical well. That is not to say that the horizontal well is necessarily less productive but rather that stimulation operations applied to the horizontal well are often less impactful than desired.

Unlike a vertical well, the horizontal well is likely to traverse a particular formation layer roughly in parallel with the layer as opposed to traversing several different layers of a formation as a vertical well would. This roughly 90° difference in orientation means that the fractures which are formed from the horizontal well are often the features that traverse different formation layers above and below the horizontal section. Once more, unlike a vertical well section, the fractures are not supported with the robustness of casing or other structural support. Rather, the fractures are more akin to open-hole channels supported internally by proppant and perhaps some fibers or other constituents.

The lack of structural support in fractures traversing layered or strata of a formation lends them susceptible to issues that may largely close off portions of the fractures to production. For example, as the fracture is formed under pressure it may laminate through various strata. This is a process whereby the fracture extends vertically from the horizontal well for a distance but then shifts laterally or horizontally in one direction or another when reaching a new formation layer. Thus, a fracture that is open when being formed under pressure is susceptible to later being closed off at this lateral “pinch point” when time for production.

In another example, strata in the form of ash or other geologic material may tend to combine with the proppant mixture following stimulation to largely seal off the fracture. That is, where a vertically extended fracture traverses an ash bed formation layer, the latter introduction of proppant during the stimulation operations may ultimately close off the fracture at the ash bed location.

Where the architectural layout of an oilfield calls for a horizontal well, such wells are generally employed to enhance production. However, due to unique challenges faced by fractures of such wells, production efficiency is often not enhanced by stimulation operations to the extent desired. Indeed, it may often be the case that well production is prematurely terminated and the well killed even though fractures of the horizontal well remain in communication with a formation's production fluids.

SUMMARY

A method of providing fluid communication between a main bore of a horizontal well and a substantially non-producing region of a formation encompassed by a fracture from the main bore is disclosed. The method includes forming a micro-tunnel from a tunnel location that is adjacent a fracture location at the main bore to intersect the non-producing region.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is an overview depiction of an oilfield with embodiments of micro-tunnels connecting a main bore with a substantially non-producing region of fractures.

FIG. 2 is an enlarged view of an embodiment of a micro-tunnel of FIG. 1 taken from 2-2 of FIG. 1.

FIG. 3 is a schematic representation of the horizontal main bore and a fracture of FIG. 1 revealing angular calculations for the micro-tunnel of FIG. 2.

FIG. 4A is an enlarged depiction of an embodiment of an angled deflector positioned in the horizontal main bore.

FIG. 4B is an enlarged depiction of the angled deflector of FIG. 4A interfacing an embodiment of a micro-tunneling device.

FIG. 4C is an enlarged depiction of the micro-tunneling device of FIG. 4B forming an embodiment of a micro-tunnel from the main bore.

FIG. 5 is a flow-chart summarizing an embodiment of providing access to compromised fractured production regions.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Embodiments are described with reference to horizontal well fracturing and stimulation applications. In particular, downhole fracturing where repeated frac zones or fractures emerging vertically from a horizontal main bore is depicted. This may be through repeated isolating and stimulation applications to form the fractures. Regardless of the particular techniques employed to form the fractures or the number of fractures themselves, the embodiments herein are directed at an architectural layout for a well that introduces micro-tunnels to provide access to compromised or substantially non-producing regions of a fracture. This may include circumstances in which the fracture failed to fluidly link with the main bore following stimulation and/or circumstances where such fluid link is being restored through a micro-tunnel, for example, where the non-producing region became fluidly inaccessible some period after stimulation.

Additionally, as used herein, the term “micro-tunnel” is not meant to place a particular size restriction on the embodiments of tunnels described herein. Rather, the term is meant to infer that these “micro” tunnels would generally be smaller in initial diameter than the main bore of the horizontal well from which these tunnels would be expected to emerge. Of course, circumstances may arise where these micro-tunnels are of variable diameter as they are formed through an open formation toward a substantially non-producing region as detailed herein. Regardless, so long as fluid access between the non-producing region and the horizontal main bore is formed or restored, appreciable benefit may be realized.

Referring now to FIG. 1, an overview depiction of an oilfield 100 is shown with embodiments of micro-tunnels 160 connecting a main bore 180 with a substantially non-producing region 165 of fractures 115, 116, 117, 118. As shown, the main bore 180 transitions from substantially vertical to deviated or substantially horizontal as the fractures 115, 116, 117, 118 emerge therefrom. Thus, the fractures 115, 116, 117, 118 are substantially vertical themselves. This means that each given fracture 115, 116, 117, 118 may traverse a variety of formation layers 190, 195, 197, 198, 199. This is in contrast to circumstances where fractures might extend horizontally from a vertical section of the main bore 180 and more likely traverse only one or two formation layers.

With the possibility of transecting so many formation layers 190, 195, 197, 198, 199, the opportunity for a substantially vertical fracture 115, 116, 117, 118 to be compromised by a given formation layer 190, 195, 197, 198, 199 may be increased. Thus, the micro-tunnels 160 depicted herein may be utilized to provide fluid communication between the main bore 180 and an otherwise substantially non-producing region 165 of the fractures 115, 116, 117, 118. For example, in the embodiment shown, the fractures 115, 116, 117, 118 may transect certain formation layers in the form of ash beds 197, 199 which, as detailed below, may tend to seal off production following stimulation. This is reflected by fracture seals 170 depicted in the formation which close off certain regions 165 of the fractures 115, 116, 117, 118 from the rest of the fracture 115, 116, 117, 118 and the main bore 180. However, the micro-tunnels 160 may be used to create or restore access to such regions 165. Indeed, the term used herein for these regions 165 is “substantially non-producing” as noted above. However, this is only meant to infer the character of these regions in absence of the illustrated micro-tunnels 160. More specifically, upon intersecting these regions 165 with micro-tunnels 160 as illustrated, they may take on a substantially producing character.

Continuing with reference to FIG. 1, the oilfield 100 depicts architecture that in many respects is not atypical. A main well bore 180 has been formed with a vertical section defined by casing 185. The well bore 180 transitions into a horizontal section that may be open-hole or perhaps fitted with a slotted liner or other defining structure that is adept at supporting hydrocarbon production from the surrounding formation (e.g. 190, 195, 197, 198, 199). Further along these lines, the depicted fractures 115, 116, 117, 118 are shown which have been formed following a sequential fracturing application. For example, a series of zonal isolation, perforating and stimulating applications may be employed to form the fractures 115, 116, 117, 118 as shown. Ultimately, stimulation leaves the fractures 115, 116, 117, 118 largely filled with proppant for integral support. However, in certain circumstances, this may result in interaction with certain types of formation materials such as ash which may result in the described seals 170.

In absence of the micro-tunnels 160, a given fracture 115 may be left with a production window (W) as depicted due to the seals 170. Thus, micro-tunnels 160 may be effective in restoring effective access to the entirety of the fracture 115. Of course, in other embodiments, alternative features may work to cut off access to portions of a fracture 115. For example, where the fracture traverses laminated formation layers that tend to guide the fracture 115 to shift laterally in one direction or another as it traverses different layers, pinch points may form. These points may act similar to seals in presenting a challenge to production toward the main bore 180 from regions of the fracture 115 that are beyond the pinch points. Thus, in absence of micro-tunnels 160, these regions 165 may again be termed substantially “non-producing”.

Continuing with added reference to FIG. 1, the oilfield 100 is shown accommodating a variety of surface equipment 125. Specifically, following stimulation operations as noted above, equipment 125 may be brought to the site which is directed specifically at creating the described micro-tunnels 160. For example, in the embodiment shown, coiled tubing 110 is brought to the wellsite to aid in forming the tunnels 160 as detailed below. This may immediately follow large scale stimulation operations which provided the depicted fractures 115, 116, 117, 118. Alternatively, in circumstances where seals 170 or other obstructions are not certain to emerge for an extended period of time, if at all, the tunnel forming equipment 125 may be brought to the wellsite long after production operations have commenced. For example, the equipment 125 may be used to restore well production after production through fracture windows (W) has been exhausted. That is, rather than cease operations, micro-tunnel architecture may be added.

In the embodiment shown, the equipment 125 includes a mobile coiled tubing truck 130 with a reel to deploy the coiled tubing 110 and a control unit 135 to guide the operations. A mobile rig 140 supports a standard gooseneck injector 145 for driving the coiled tubing 110 and a micro-tunneling tool downhole beyond pressure control equipment 150 (e.g. see the jetting tool 475 of FIG. 4B). Of course, a variety of other types of tools may be used to form the tunnels 160 which may be delivered by means other than coiled tubing 110. For example, water jetting as indicated, drilling with drill pipe, microcoil or utilizing a borehole assembly (BHA) with a dedicated downhole motor associated with the tunneling tool or a variety of other suitable tunneling techniques may be utilized. In one embodiment, the BHA may be a combinatory tool equipped with both a window cutting tool for creating a hole in casing or liner if need be in advance of using a tunneling tool for creating the micro-tunnel 160 through the formation 198.

Referring now to FIG. 2, an enlarged view of a micro-tunnel 160 and surrounding features taken from 2-2 of FIG. 1 is shown. In this enlarged view, the casing 185 is shown terminating at a production packer 250 which may support a tubing hanger, liner or other lower completion hardware through the horizontal portion of the main bore 180. That is, this portion of the main bore 180 is specifically targeted for the production of hydrocarbons. However, as noted above, a seal 170 which has formed at the ash layer 197 is apparent. This is not an uncommon occurrence when conventional proppant 200 such as sand mixes with these types of formation particles. Thus, as noted above, in absence of such tunnels 160, production from the fracture 115 might be largely limited to the depicted production window (W), with sealed off non-producing regions 165 beyond any ash layers 197 (see also FIG. 1).

In order to provide or restore access to such regions 165, micro-tunnels 160 may be provided. Such micro-tunnels 160 may vary in length depending on practicality and need. For example, the tunnels 160 may range from 2 meters to 200 meters in length. These tunnels 160 may be formed with tools as indicated above which are guided by prior obtained formation data. That is, just as logging information regarding the formation may play a role in the layout of the main bore 180 and other features, such information may also play a role in determining where to have a tunnel 160 emerge from the main bore 180, the angle to employ, etc. For the particular micro-tunnel 160 shown in FIG. 2, the tunnel 160 emerges from the main bore 160 at a casing location immediately uphole of, and adjacent, the fracture 115. Therefore, forming the tunnel 160 may involve use of a drilling or other suitable tool for forming a casing window.

Referring now to FIG. 3, with added reference to FIG. 2, a schematic representation of the horizontal main bore 180 and this same fracture 115 of FIG. 1 is shown revealing angular considerations for the micro-tunnel 160 of FIG. 2. For example, the path 360 for a straight micro-tunnel 160 emerging from the main bore 180 would track along an angle of less than about 90°. The closer the angle to 90°, the longer the tunnel 160 would need to be in order to reach the fracture 115. In the embodiment shown, the targeted region 165 for intersecting the fracture 115 is near one end thereof as depicted. Of course, this may not always be the case. Circumstances may arise where non-productive regions 165 are at other locations of the fracture 115 or at multiple locations, perhaps calling for multiple tunnels 160 to emerge from the same side of the main bore 180.

Continuing with reference to FIGS. 2 and 3, in the embodiment shown, the angle 300 is about 45° with the location emerging from the main bore 180 at a distance (D) of about 100 meters from the center of the fracture 115. Once more, the height (h) of the fracture is about 75 meters. Thus, where the path 360 is to intersect the fracture 115 at about its height, this means that the micro-tunnel 160 would be about 125 meters in length. This is determined from a simple right triangle equation where the hypotenuse (the path 360) is equal to the square root of (D²+h²). Of course, this is only an illustrative example, the length of the path 360, where to have the tunnel 160 emerge from the bore, the specific angle 300 to be utilized may be determined together in light of logging information available, the type of tool utilized in forming the tunnel 160 and a host of other factors. For example, the angle 300 may be between about 5° and 90° where a jetting tool is employed and between about 18° and 90° where a drilling tool is utilized.

Referring now to FIG. 4A, an enlarged depiction of an embodiment of an angled deflector 400 is shown positioned in the horizontal main bore 180. In this embodiment, a liner 450 is also shown defining this portion of the main bore 180 as is often found in such horizontal lower completions. Continuing with the example of FIG. 3, the deflector 400 may be a 45° deflector deployed to the depicted location with the coiled tubing 110 of FIG. 1, drillstring or other appropriate conveyance.

Referring now to FIG. 4B, an enlarged depiction of the angled deflector 400 of FIG. 4A is shown interfacing an embodiment of a micro-tunneling device 475. In the embodiment shown, the device 475 is a water jetting tool capable of penetrating both the liner 450 and the adjacent formation 198. Further, it is deployed to the site of the deflector 400 via the coiled tubing 110 and associated equipment depicted in FIG. 1. Of course in other embodiments, alternative forms of deployments and/or devices may be utilized. For example, laser cutting, perforating, electrical decomposition and drilling may also be utilized. Laser cutting in particular may be desirable where the micro-tunnel 160 is to be of an extended length given the propensity to maintain straightness due to lack of physical contact with the formation 198 as the tunnel 160 is being formed.

Referring now to FIG. 4C, an enlarged depiction of the micro-tunneling device 475 of FIG. 4B is shown forming an embodiment of a micro-tunnel 160 as the coiled tubing 110 exits the main bore 180 as directed by the deflector 400. However, in other embodiments other techniques for forming the tunnel 160 may be utilized. Additionally, once the micro-tunnel 160 is formed, the deflector 400 may be repositioned and/or reoriented to form a subsequent micro-tunnel 160 (e.g. as illustrated in FIG. 1).

Referring now to FIG. 5, a flow-chart summarizing an embodiment of providing access to compromised fractured production regions is illustrated. Namely, a horizontal well is completed as indicated at 520 which allows for stimulation operations to ultimately form substantially vertical fractures as noted at 540. The well may then be produced at the outset (see 580). However, even before production begins, micro-tunnels may be formed between the main bore and predicted non-producing regions of various fractures as noted at 560. Of course, in other embodiments, these micro-tunnels may be formed as a restorative measure following production that has fallen off or ceased.

Embodiments described hereinabove include techniques that allow for stimulation efforts directed at horizontal wells to be of enhanced efficiency. That is, while stimulated horizontal wells are often compromised in terms of effective production access to all fracture regions, the embodiments detailed hereinabove address this issue. Thus, the impact of stimulation operations on overall production efforts may be maximized.

The preceding description has been presented with reference to presently preferred embodiments. Persons skilled in the art and technology to which these embodiments pertain will appreciate that alterations and changes in the described structures and methods of operation may be practiced without meaningfully departing from the principle, and scope of these embodiments. For example, embodiments depicted herein reveal the use of fairly straight micro-tunnels guided by a deflector. However, micro-tunnels may take on other architecture. Such alternatives may include utilizing a whipstock or other steerable drilling system that allows for a tunneling tool to emerge from the wellbore at one angle, e.g. perpendicular and then steered toward a non-producing region. Furthermore, the foregoing description should not be read as pertaining only to the precise structures described and shown in the accompanying drawings, but rather should be read as consistent with and as support for the following claims, which are to have their fullest and fairest scope.

Claims

1. A method of providing fluid communication between a main bore of a horizontal well and a substantially non-producing region of a formation encompassed by a fracture from the main bore, the method comprising forming a micro-tunnel from a tunnel location of the main bore adjacent the fracture, the micro-tunnel intersecting the fracture at the non-producing region.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the forming of the micro-tunnel comprises deploying a micro-tunneling tool to the tunnel location with one of coiled tubing, micro-coil and drill string.

3. The method of claim 2 wherein the micro-tunneling tool is selected from a group consisting of a jetting tool, a perforating tool, a drill, a laser cutting tool, an electrical decomposition tool and a combinatory tool.

4. The method of claim 3 further comprising cutting structure defining the main bore with a window cutting device of the combinatory tool in advance of the forming of the micro-tunnel.

5. The method of claim 1 further comprising deploying an angled deflector to the tunnel location of the main bore to guide the forming of the micro-tunnel.

6. The method of claim 5 further comprising: moving the angled deflector to another tunnel location of the main bore adjacent another fracture; andforming another micro-tunnel from the other tunnel location to another substantially non-producing region encompassed by the other fracture.

7. The method of claim 6 further comprising: leaving the angled deflector in the well between the forming of the micro-tunnels; andproducing from the well after the forming of the micro-tunnels.

8. The method of claim 5 wherein the angled deflector is configured to direct the forming of the micro-tunnel at under about 90° relative the main bore at the tunnel location.

9. The method of claim 8 wherein the angled deflector is configured to direct the forming of the micro-tunnel at more than about 5°, the method further comprising advancing a jetting tool to the angled deflector for the forming of the micro-tunnel.

10. The method of claim 8 wherein the angled deflector is configured to direct the forming of the micro-tunnel at more than about 18°, the method further comprising advancing a drilling tool to the angled deflector for the forming of the micro-tunnel.

11. A method of producing fluid from a well at an oilfield, the method comprising: stimulating a main bore of a horizontal well;producing well fluids from a producing region of a fracture serviced by the stimulating of the main bore;forming a micro-tunnel from a tunnel location of the main bore adjacent the fracture to a substantially non-producing region of the fracture; andproducing well fluids from the non-producing region.

12. The method of claim 11 wherein the producing region is separated from the non-producing region by one of a formation seal within the fracture and a pinch point of laminating formation layers.

13. The method of claim 11 wherein the tunnel location is uphole of the fracture.

14. The method of claim 11 wherein the forming of the micro-tunnel is guided by deployment of an angled deflector.

15. The method of claim 11 wherein the forming of the micro-tunnel is achieved with a steerable mechanism.

16. The method of claim 15 further comprising: driving the steerable mechanism out of the main bore from the tunnel location in a substantially perpendicular manner relative the bore; andsteering the mechanism toward the non-producing region.

17. The method of claim 16 wherein the steering mechanism includes a whipstock.

18. An architectural layout for a well at an oilfield, the layout comprising: a substantially horizontal section of a main bore;at least one substantially vertical fracture in communication with the horizontal section of the main bore;a substantially non-producing region of the fracture;a micro-tunnel running from a tunnel location adjacent the fracture to the substantially non-producing region to provide fluid communication with the main bore.

19. The architectural layout of claim 18 wherein the substantially non-producing region is defined by one of a pinch point from laminated formation layers and a formation seal.

20. The architectural layout of claim 19 wherein the formation seal comprises proppant of the fracture mixed with ash.