The present invention relates to an audio distribution system.
An audio distribution system consists of a set of audio inputs connected in such a way as to either mix or route these inputs to a single output or set of outputs. There is always one output that may have a multiplicity of inputs which will be either selectable or mixed together to form the composite audio signal, which, after amplification, is fed to output device(s), usually loudspeakers.
The conventional way of combining and routing all these input signals is via a mixer, In the mixer, the audio inputs are combined at various selected levels using volume controls to give a composite output signal which may be fed to an amplifier for amplification and hence to output devices, for example, loudspeakers. Some common features of these mixers are:
Where many inputs are required the mixer needs to be able to handle and control many different inputs which may be in different signal formats, for example, from a microphone and from the stereo output of for example, a CD player.
Many different audio products have different audio output connections as standard. These connectors are not suited to a single ‘mixer’ which tends to have many audio inputs all with the same input connection system.
All of the audio inputs have to be cabled back to the same point, that is the composite mixer position.
In typical systems different inputs at different input levels are required for, for example background music (BGM) for a stereo output at 0 db (relative to 1vRMS-Line Level) requiring its own mixing, and a microphone input from an electret microphone at −60 db typically.
These conventional types of mixers are used in most audio applications where the audio inputs are all relatively near to each other and prove convenient. However, currently there is an increasing demand for systems to have many inputs spatially distributed around a building at different points with a requirement for many different audio connectors which are not compatible with conventional mixers. In these types of applications conventional mixing systems have several disadvantages:
There will be long cable runs to the mixer from some inputs from various points in a building. If these cables carry conventional unbalanced microphone level inputs then they will be very susceptible to electromagnetic pick up and interference characterized normally by ‘mains hum’.
Quite often only one or two inputs are required and the mixers tend to be a least 6-way type units. This leads to many redundant and unnecessary inputs.
Different plug and connection systems employed now in the audio industry (both industrial and domestic) mean that virtually every conventional mixer will require at least some form of special lead to be manufactured from the input device to the mixer and in the case of a stereo signal will require that two inputs are used to mix the stereo signal. Even where the connection system is compatible, the cable from the audio device needs to be so long that it requires extending quite often in very expensive shielded cable.
Many audio sources are not of the so called ‘balanced type’, In this type of source there are two wires in which neither is grounded. The audio signal is defined as the difference between the signal levels on the two wires. Thus any common mode induced signal is eliminated when the signal is terminated by a suitable balanced to unbalanced converter. This means that if they are not of a high signal level they are susceptible to electromagnetic induction (EMI) causing interference with the wanted signal.
Clearly in situations where audio sources are to be sited spatially away from the central mixing equipment this situation is not ideal. It would be beneficial if the signal conditioning were to be effected nearer to the audio source together with the provision of a suitable connection system to suit the audio source.
According to the present invention there is provided an audio distribution system comprising a plurality of individual signal conditioning circuits connected in series each circuit comprising means for converting a balanced signal to an unbalanced signal, means for mixing the unbalanced signal with an audio signal to form a composite signal and means for rebalancing the composite signal to form a balanced signal.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the means for converting comprises a balanced to unbalanced precision converter. The means for mixing comprises a precision addition device. The precision addition device is connected to the output from the precision converter. Means are advantageously provided for conditioning the audio signal. The means for conditioning the audio signal are connected to the precision addition device. The means for rebalancing comprises an unbalanced to balanced precision converter. The means for rebalancing is connected at its input to the output from the means for mixing. The means for conditioning the audio signal comprises one or more audio controls such as tone, volume, on/off, attenuation or, spectral manipulation.
In order that the invention may be more clearly understood, one embodiment thereof will now be described by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Referring to
Referring to
A representative signal conditioning circuit is shown in more detail in
The precision addition device 21 operates to combine and convert the inputs to it to a composite audio signal and then rebalance that signal producing minimal attenuation/distortion and introduction of noise. Each conditioning circuit is mounted on a standard sized electrical plate (single or double gang) and there are many different types of plate each performing a particular function or having a particular connection system for a particular purpose. Extra units may be added as required situated around the building to suit the positioning of the audio sources and types. The units are cascaded each one to the next so as to eventually give only one balanced line level input to the amplification equipment thus eliminating any mixing and control at or near to the amplifier. A conventional mixer is not now required. This type of system lends itself to for example loop amplification systems such as Audio Frequency Inductions Loop Systems (AFILS systems) in which many microphones may be required and spatially distributed (for example conference table) together with inputs from the local public address (PA) system. Power for the system is provided down a separate pair of wires at 12-24v DC from the amplifier auxiliary supply terminals if available or a separate Power Supply Unit (FISU) as preferred. The power is shown being supplied externally but it may be internal or run from different voltages. This is not a critical function.
A system enhancement could be to route the power as composite on the audio cable thus saving wiring. This is feasible but will add more complexity (unnecessarily) to the device.
The more detailed arrangement leads to a number of advantages as compared with prior art arrangements of the sort shown in
Only the correct number of inputs are provided which reduces cost. One cable can be used to loop through one circuit to the next instead of every input being required to go back to a central point as in
Because there may be many cascaded units, the electrical noise being generated at each circuit will be additive. For example a S/N ration of 70 db is normally acceptable for microphone preamplifiers on paging quality systems. Once the S/N ration falls below say 50 db then electrical noise becomes significant and normally unacceptable. If the insertion effect of adding another audio input unit was the introduction of another noise source at 70 db S/N ration then clearly adding in say 10 units would decrease the S/N ratio by an order of magnitude that is reduce it by 20 db to 50 db. It is therefore preferable that the effect of insertion of the serially transmitted composite audio signal is very much greater than 70 db and an order of magnitude is desirable that is >90 db. In the preferred embodiment the S/N ratio is >95 db.
Another problem is that of attenuation or amplification of the input balanced line level signal prior to its output caused by the internal signal conditioning. If many units are cascaded in series with only a small amount of for example amplification of say 5% (0.4 db) then after say 10 units the amplification becomes 1.6 times (+4 db) the original signal. This would be unacceptable. It is therefore preferred especially when many units are cascaded to match the amplitude of the balanced input to the output to within 1% of each other (approx 0.1 db). In the preferred embodiment the insertion loss/gain is within 0.05 db.
A third problem is harmonic distortion (non-linearity type distortion) which coupled with noise forms another source of interference to the signal. Again this is compounded by having many stages in series. Therefore it is preferred that the insertion effect of another unit has a very small effect on (THD TOTAL HARMONIC DISTORTION+Noise). THD+Noise of 1% is normally tolerable but again because of the cascaded nature of the system should be at least an order of magnitude less that this on an individual unit basis. In the preferred embodiment the THD+Noise is <0.01% change to the through signal.
It will be appreciated that the above embodiment has been described by way of example only and that many variations are possible without departing from the scope of the invention.
A device may be provided to accept balanced or unbalanced microphone level signals (<−40 db signals) that require the provision or not of a ‘phantom’ (dc bias) supply to the microphone line. This device then contains a pre-amplifier to take the signal up to line level ready for mixing. A device with in built microphone capsule for direct mounting to a surface for example may be provided. A dual input device to accept and combine a stereo input with a mono signal prior to conditioning. A device to accept any of the above with a switch mechanism to switch on/off either the individual input or the input through line level feed, may be used as a paging type microphone input.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0227698.8 | Nov 2002 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB03/05181 | 11/27/2003 | WO | 00 | 11/7/2005 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2004/049758 | 6/10/2004 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4524452 | Marshak | Jun 1985 | A |
4882762 | Waldhauer | Nov 1989 | A |
5165099 | Onaya et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5666428 | Carrin et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
6389139 | Peterson, Jr. et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
7065418 | Standard et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060153397 A1 | Jul 2006 | US |