Audio enhancement system

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6597791
  • Patent Number
    6,597,791
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, December 15, 1998
    26 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 22, 2003
    21 years ago
Abstract
A stereo enhancement system processes the difference signal component generated from a pair of left and right input signals to create a broadened stereo image reproduced through a pair of speakers or through a surround sound system. Processing of the difference signal component occurs through equalization characterized by amplification of the low and high range of auditory frequencies. The processed difference signal is combined with a sum signal, generated from the left and right input signals, and the original left and right input signals to create enhanced left and right output signals.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




This invention relates generally to audio enhancement systems, and especially those systems and methods designed to improve the realism of stereo sound reproduction. More particularly, this invention relates to apparatus for broadening the sound image created from amplification of stereo signals through a pair of loudspeakers, without introducing unnatural phase-shift or time-delays within the stereo signals.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Those actively involved in audio or audio-visual industries have continually strived to overcome the imperfections of reproduced sound. Presently, with the onslaught of interactive multimedia computer systems, and other audio-visual advances, the concern over audio quality has heightened. Consequently, there are renewed efforts among the audio industry to develop technological improvements in sound recordings and their reproduction.




Imperfections of reproduced sound can result from, among other things, microphones which ineffectively record sound, and speakers which ineffectively reproduce recorded sound. Attempts at sound image enhancement by those in the relevant industries have resulted in methods which record and encode the positional information of a sound's origin along with the sound information itself. Such methods include the multi-channel surround systems which operate using specially encoded audio information, and special decoding systems to interpret the information.




Sound enhancement systems which do not require specially recorded sound are typically less complex and much less expensive. Such systems include those which introduce unnatural time-delays or phase-shifts between left and right signal sources. Many of these systems attempt to compensate for the inability of a microphone to mimic the frequency response of a human ear. These systems may also attempt to compensate for the fact that, because of the location of a speaker, the perceived direction of sound emanating from that speaker may be inconsistent with the original location of the sound. Although the foregoing systems attempt to reproduce sound in a more realistic and life-like manner, use of such methods have resulted in mixed results in the competitive audio enhancement field.




Other sound enhancement techniques operate on what are termed sum and difference signals. The sum and difference signals represent the sum of left and right stereo signals, and the difference between left and right stereo signals, respectively.




It is known that boosting the level of difference signal in a pair of stereo left and right signals can widen a perceived sound image projected from a pair of loudspeakers, or other electroacoustic transducers, placed in front of a listener. The widened sound image results from amplification of ambient or reverberant sounds which are present in the difference signal. This ambient sound is readily perceived in a live sound stage at the appropriate level. In a recorded performance, however, the ambient sounds are masked by the direct sounds, and are not perceived at the same level as a live performance.




There have been many attempts to improve ambient sound information from a recorded performance by indiscriminately increasing the difference signal over a broad frequency spectrum. An indiscriminate increase in the difference signal, however, can undesirably affect a person's sound perception. For example, boosting of the difference signal in the mid-range of audio frequencies can lead to sound perception which is overly sensitive to the position of a listener's head.




A critically-acclaimed sound enhancement technique which processes the sum and difference signals is disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,748,669 and 4,866,774 both issued to Arnold Klayman, the same inventor for the invention disclosed in the present application.




As disclosed in both the '669 and the '774 patents, a sound enhancement system provides either dynamic or fixed equalization of the difference signal in selected frequency bands. In such a system, equalization of the difference signal is provided to boost the difference signal components of lower intensity without overemphasizing the stronger difference signal components. The stronger difference signal components are typically found in a mid-range of frequencies of approximately 1 to 4 KHz. These same mid-range of frequencies correspond to those which the human ear has heightened sensitivity. The various embodiments of the systems disclosed in the '669 and '774 patents also equalize the relative amplitudes of the sum signal in specific frequency bands to prevent the sum signal from being overwhelmed by the difference signal. Moreover, the level of difference-signal boost provided by the '669 and '774 enhancement systems is a function of the sum signal itself.




The specific advantages of selectively boosting the sum and difference signals in light of the human auditory response characteristics, is fully disclosed in detail in U.S. Pat. No. 4,748,669 and U.S. Pat. No. 4,866,774.




Even with the foregoing audio enhancement techniques, there is a need for an audio enhancement system that can provide high quality stereo image enhancement and which can meet all of the demands of the burgeoning computer multimedia market, and those of the audio and audio-visual markets in general. The stereo enhancement system disclosed herein fulfills this need.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The apparatus and method disclosed herein for creating a wider sound image is an improvement over the related stereo enhancement systems disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,738,669 and 4,866,744, both of which are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. This improved system has already achieved wide critical acclaim. For example, in the November 1994 issue of Multimedia World, one author describes the present invention as something which “looks like it's going to be the next big thing on the multimedia PC, and for good reason: It works.” Moreover, with respect to the same stereo enhancement system, the September 1994 issue of PC Gamer magazine writes: “Of all the various advances in audio technology over the past couple of years, none is as impressive.”




The explosion of the computer multimedia market has created a huge class of audio and/or audio-visual systems which are ideally configured for a stereo enhancement system that can broaden a sound field emanating from two speakers. For example, most computer implementations of sound enhancement systems require simplistic circuits which are very inexpensive and which occupy very little space.




Sound generated on multimedia computer systems is typically retrieved as digital information stored on a CD-ROM, or on some other digital storage medium. Unlike analog sound-storage media, digital sound information, and in particular stereo information, is more accurately stored across a broader frequency spectrum. The presence of this information can have a significant impact on methods of stereo enhancement. In addition, amplification or enhancement of such digitally-stored sound may tend to overdrive computer audio amplifiers or computer speakers, which may be relatively “low-power” devices. This concern is particularly relevant in the lower, i.e., bass, frequencies where over-amplification can cause amplifier “clipping,” and may severely damage the low-power speakers of computer systems or television sets.




Accordingly, a stereo enhancement system is disclosed which produces a realistic stereo image projected across a larger listening area. The resulting stereo enhancement is particularly effective when applied to a pair of speakers placed in front of a listener. However, the enhancement system disclosed herein may also be used with any of the current surround-sound type systems to help broaden the overall sound image and remove identifiable point sources.




Creating an award-winning stereo sound image which envelopes the listener is accomplished through a surprisingly simplistic circuit structure. In a preferred embodiment, the stereo enhancement system comprises a circuit for generating a set of sum and difference signals from left and right input source signals. The amplitude levels of the generated sum and difference signals may be fixed at a predetermined level or they may be manually adjusted by an operator of the stereo enhancement system. In addition, the left and right input source signals may be actual or synthetically generated stereo signals.




Passive component circuitry is used to spectrally shape, or equalize, the difference signal to enhance the frequency components which are statistically of low-intensity. Equalization of the low-intensity difference signal components occurs without inappropriately boosting the corresponding mid-range frequency components. In sound systems which may be unable to accommodate excessive difference-signal gain among the bass frequencies, a high-pass filter limits the amplification of these frequency components.




Shaping of the difference signal enhances any ambient or reverberant sound effects which may be present in the difference signal but masked by more intense direct-field sounds. The equalized difference signal is recombined with the sum signal and the left and right input signals, respectively, to generate enhanced left and right output signals.




The enhancement system disclosed herein may be readily implemented by a digital signal processor, with discrete circuit components, or as a hybrid circuit structure. Because of its unique circuit structure and accommodation of low-power audio devices, the enhancement system is particularly desirable in audio systems which are inexpensive, those which operate with relatively low-power output signals, and those which have limited space for incorporating an enhancement system.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




The above and other aspects, features, and advantages of the present invention will be more apparent from the following particular description thereof presented in conjunction with the following drawings, wherein:





FIG. 1

is a schematic block diagram of a stereo enhancement system for generating a broadened stereo image from a pair of input stereo signals.





FIG. 2

is a graphical display of the frequency response of a perspective enhancement curve applied to the difference signal stereo component.





FIG. 3

is a schematic diagram of a preferred embodiment of a stereo enhancement system for generating a broadened stereo image from a pair of input stereo signals.





FIG. 4

is a schematic diagram of an alternative embodiment of a stereo enhancement system for generating a broadened stereo image from a pair of input stereo signals.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT




Referring initially to

FIG. 1

, a functional block diagram is shown depicting a preferred embodiment of the present invention. In

FIG. 1

, a stereo enhancement system


10


inputs a left stereo signal


12


and a right stereo signal


14


. The left and right stereo signals


12


and


14


are fed to a first summing device


16


, e.g., an electronic adder, along paths


18


and


20


, respectively. A sum signal, representing the sum of the left and right stereo signals


12


and


14


, is generated by the summing device


16


at its output


22


.




The left stereo signal


12


is connected along a path


24


to an audio filter


28


, while the right stereo signal


14


is connected along a path


26


to an audio filter


30


. The outputs of the filters


28


and


30


are fed to a second summing device


32


. The summing device


32


generates a difference signal at an output


34


which represents the difference of the filtered left and right input signals. The filters


28


and


30


are pre-conditioning high-pass filters which are designed to reduce the bass components present in the difference signal. A reduction in difference-signal bass components is performed in accordance with a preferred embodiment for reasons set forth below.




The summing device


16


and the summing device


32


form a summing network having output signals individually fed to separate level-adjusting devices


36


and


38


. The devices


36


and


38


are ideally potentiometers or similar variable-impedance devices. Adjustment of the devices


36


and


38


is typically performed manually by a user to control the base level of sum and difference signal present in the output signals. This allows a user to tailor the level and aspect of stereo enhancement according to the type of sound reproduced, and depending on the user's personal preferences. An increase in the level of the sum signal emphasizes the audio signals appearing at a center stage positioned between a pair of speakers. Conversely, an increase in the level of difference signal emphasizes the ambient sound information creating the perception of a wider sound image. In some audio arrangements where the parameters of music type and system configuration are known, or where manual adjustment is not practical, the adjustment devices


36


and


38


may be eliminated and the sum and difference-signal levels fixed at a predetermined value.




The output of the device


38


is fed into an equalizer


40


at an input


42


. The equalizer


40


spectrally shapes the difference signal appearing at input


42


by separately applying a low-pass audio filter


44


, a high-pass audio filter


48


, and an attenuation circuit


46


to the difference signal as shown. Output signals from the filters


44


,


48


, and the circuit


46


exit the equalizer


40


along paths


50


,


54


, and


52


, respectively.




The modified difference signals transferred along paths


50


,


52


, and


54


make up the components of a processed difference signal, (L−R)


p


. These components are fed into a summing network comprising a summing device


56


and a summing device


58


. The summing device


56


also receives the sum signal output from the device


36


, as well as the original left stereo signal


12


. All five of these signals are added within the summing device


58


to produce an enhanced left output signal


60


.




Similarly, the modified difference signals from the equalizer


40


, the sum signal, and the original right stereo signal


14


are combined within the summing device


56


to produce an enhanced right output signal


62


. The components of the difference signal originating along paths


50


,


52


, and


54


are inverted by the summing device


56


to produce a difference signal for the right speaker, (R−L)p, which is 180 degrees out-of-phase from that of the left speaker.




The overall spectral shaping, i.e., normalization, of the difference signal occurs as the summing devices


56


and


58


combine the filtered and attenuated components of the difference signal to create the left and right output signals


60


and


62


. Accordingly, the enhanced left and right output signals


60


and


62


produce a much improved audio effect because ambient sounds are selectively emphasized to fully encompass a listener within a reproduced sound stage. The left and right output signals


60


and


62


are represented by the following mathematical formulas:








L




out




=L




in




+K




1


(


L+R


)+


K




2


(


L−R


)


p


  (1)










R




out




=R




in




+K




1


(


L+R


)−


K




2


(


L−R


)


p


  (2)






It should be noted that input signals L


in


and R


in


in the equations above are typically stereo source signals, but may also be synthetically generated from a monophonic source. One such method of stereo synthesis which may be used with the present invention is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,841,572, also issued to Arnold Klayman and incorporated herein by reference. Moreover, as discussed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,748,669, the enhanced left and right output signals represented above may be magnetically or electronically stored on various recording media, such as vinyl records, compact discs, digital or analog audio tape, or computer data storage media. Enhanced left and right output signals which have been stored may then be reproduced by a conventional stereo reproduction system to achieve the same level of stereo image enhancement.




The signal (L−R)


p


in the equations above represents the processed difference signal which has been spectrally shaped according to the present invention. In accordance with a preferred embodiment, modification of the difference signal is represented by the frequency response depicted in

FIG. 2

, which is labeled the enhancement perspective, or normalization, curve


70


.




The perspective curve


70


is displayed as a function of gain, measured in decibels, against audible frequencies displayed in log format. According to a preferred embodiment, the perspective curve


70


has a peak gain of approximately 10 dB at a point A located at approximately 125 Hz. The gain of the perspective curve


70


decreases above and below 125 Hz at a rate of approximately 6 dB per octave. The perspective curve


70


applies a minimum gain of −2 dB to the difference signal at a point B of approximately 2.1 Khz. The gain increases above 2.1 Khz at a rate of 6 dB per octave up to a point C at approximately 7 Khz, and then continues to increase up to approximately 20 Khz, i.e., approximately the highest frequency audible to the human ear. Although the overall equalization of the perspective curve


70


is accomplished using high-pass and low-pass filters, it is possible to also use a band-rejection filter, having a minimum gain at point B, in conjunction with a high-pass filter to obtain a similar perspective curve.




In a preferred embodiment, the gain separation between points A and B of the perspective curve


70


is ideally designed to be 12 dB, and the gain separation between points B and C should be approximately 6 dB. These figures are design constraints and the actual figures will likely vary from circuit to circuit depending on the actual value of components used. If the signal level devices


36


and


38


are fixed, then the perspective curve


70


will remain constant. However, adjustment of the device


38


will slightly vary the gain separation between points A and B, and points B and C. If the maximum gain separation is significantly less than 12 dB, the resulting effect is an increase in the mid-range amplification which can create an uncomfortable listening experience. Conversely, a gain separation much larger than 12 dB tends to reduce a listener's perception of mid-range definition.




Implementation of the perspective curve by a digital signal processor will, in most cases, more accurately reflect the design constraints discussed above. For an analog implementation, it is acceptable if the frequencies corresponding to points A, B, and C, and the constraints on gain separation, vary by plus or minus 20 percent. Such a deviation from the ideal specifications will still produce the desired stereo enhancement effect, although with less than optimum results.




As can be seen in

FIG. 2

, difference signal frequencies below 125 Hz receive a decreased amount of boost, if any, through the application of the perspective curve


70


. This decrease is intended to avoid over-amplification of very low, i.e., bass, frequencies. With many audio reproduction systems, amplifying an audio difference signal in this low-frequency range can create an unpleasurable and unrealistic sound image having too much bass response. These audio reproduction systems include near-field or low-power audio systems, such as multimedia computer systems, as well as home stereo systems.




The stereo enhancement provided by the present invention is uniquely adapted to take advantage of high-quality stereo recordings. Specifically, unlike previous analog tape or vinyl album recordings, today's digitally stored sound recordings contain difference signal, i.e. stereo, information throughout a broader frequency spectrum, including the bass frequencies. Excessive amplification of the difference signal within these frequencies is therefore not required to obtain adequate bass response.




Currently, there is a rapidly-increasing number of interactive multimedia computer systems owned by the ordinary consumer and those in business alike. These systems often contain integrated audio processors or peripheral sound devices, such as sound cards, to enhance their audio-visual effect. Sound produced by multimedia computers, and other near-field audio systems such as portable stereo systems, can be of relatively low quality because of power limitations, speaker-placement limitations, and listening-position limitations imposed by such systems. Although these limitations make near-field systems viable candidates for sound image enhancement, they also impose unique problems which must be overcome by any stereo enhancement system.




Specifically, a large draw of power in these systems may cause amplifier “clipping” during periods of high boost, or it may damage components of the audio circuit including the speakers. Limiting the bass response of the difference signal also helps avoid these problems in most near-field audio enhancement applications.




Because the bass frequencies of the difference signal are not highly boosted in accordance with a preferred embodiment, audio information in the very low frequencies will also be provided by the sum signal, L+R, which is of course monophonic. In near-field systems this is of no concern because bass information applied to a pair of speakers as a sum signal will create an acoustic image in between the two speakers—precisely where the listener is expected to be. Nevertheless, the left and right signals do supply bass information and provide bass directional cues in the near-field through their corresponding amplitude levels.




Even if an audio system is not a near-field system, i.e, it has widely separated speakers and a large listening area, the perspective curve depicted in

FIG. 2

will still provide adequate low-frequency image enhancement. Specifically, bass frequencies have very large wavelengths which require a large listening area to effectively perceive a broadened bass sound image. For example, a frequency of 30 Hz has a wavelength of approximately 39 feet. A listener attempting to perceive direction in such bass frequencies would require a listening area of the same order. Consequently, stereo enhancement accomplished with the perspective curve of

FIG. 2

is also suitable for home stereo and other far-field applications.




In the absence of sum-signal equalization, stereo enhancement can be achieved, in accordance with the acoustic principles discussed herein, with a minimum of components given the proper circuit design. The present invention, therefore, can be readily and inexpensively implemented in numerous applications including those having limited available space for housing a stereo enhancement circuit.





FIG. 3

depicts a circuit for creating a broadened stereo sound image in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention. The stereo enhancement circuit


80


corresponds to the system


10


shown in FIG.


1


. In FIG.


3


, the left input signal


12


is fed to a resistor


82


, a resistor


84


, and a capacitor


86


. The right input signal


14


is fed to a capacitor


88


and resistors


90


and


92


.




The resistor


82


is in turn connected to an inverting terminal


94


of an amplifier


96


. The same inverting terminal


94


is also connected to the resistor


92


and a resistor


98


. The amplifier


96


is configured as a summing amplifier with the positive terminal


100


connected to ground via a resistor


102


. An output


104


of the amplifier


96


is connected to the positive input


100


via a feedback resistor


106


. A sum signal (L+R), representing the sum of the left and right input signals, is generated at the output


104


and fed to one end of a variable resistor


110


which is grounded at an opposite end. For proper summing of the left and right input signals by the amplifier


96


, the values of resistors


82


,


92


,


98


, and


106


in a preferred embodiment are 33.2 kohms while resistor


98


is preferably 16.5 kohms.




A second amplifier


112


is configured as a “difference” amplifier. The amplifier


112


has an inverting terminal


114


connected to a resistor


116


which is in turn connected in series to the capacitor


86


. Similarly, a positive terminal


118


of the amplifier


112


receives the right input signal through the series connection of a resistor


120


and the capacitor


88


. The terminal


118


is also connected to ground via a resistor


128


. An output terminal


122


of the amplifier


112


is connected to the inverting terminal through a feedback resistor


124


. The output


122


is also connected to a variable resistor


126


which is in turn connected to ground. Although the amplifier


112


is configured as a “difference” amplifier, its function may be characterized as the summing of the right input signal with the negative left input signal. Accordingly, the amplifiers


96


and


112


form a summing network for generating a sum signal and a difference signal, respectively.




The two series connected RC networks comprising elements


86


/


116


and


88


/


118


, respectively, operate as high-pass filters which attenuate the very low, or bass, frequencies of the left and right input signals. To obtain the proper frequency response for the perspective curve


70


of

FIG. 2

, the cutoff frequency, w


c


, or −3 dB frequency, for the high-pass filters should be approximately 100 Hz. Accordingly, in a preferred embodiment, the capacitors


86


and


88


will have a capacitance of 0.1 microfarad and the resistors


116


,


120


will have an impedance of approximately 33.2 kohms. Then, by choosing values for the feedback resistor


124


and the attenuating resistor


128


such that:











R
120


R
128


=


R
116


R
124






(
3
)













the output


122


will represent the right difference signal, (R−L), amplified by a gain of two. As a result of the high-pass filtering of the inputs, the difference signal at the output


122


will have attenuated low-frequency components below approximately 125 Hz decreasing at a rate of 6 dB per octave. It is possible to filter the low frequency components of the difference signal within the equalizer


40


, instead of using the filters


28


and


30


(shown in FIG.


1


), to separately filter the left and right input signals. However, because the filtering capacitors at low frequencies must be fairly large, it is preferable to perform this filtering at the input stage to avoid loading of the preceding circuit.




It should be noted that the difference signal refers to an audio signal containing information which is present in one input channel, i.e., either left or right, but which is not present in the other channel. The particular phase of the difference signal is relevant when determining the final makeup of the output signal. Thus, in a general sense, the difference signal signifies both L−R and R−L, which are merely 180 degrees out-of-phase. Accordingly, as can be appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art, the amplifier


112


could be configured so that the difference signal for the left output (L−R) appears at the output


122


, instead of (R−L), as long as the difference signals at the left and right outputs are out-of-phase with respect to each other.




The variable resistors


110


and


126


, which may be simple potentiometers, are adjusted by placement of wiper contacts


130


and


132


, respectively. The level of difference signal present in the enhanced output signals may be controlled by manual, remote, or automatic adjustment of the wiper contact


132


. Similarly, the level of sum signal present in the enhanced output signals is determined in part by the position of the wiper contact


130


.




The sum signal present at the wiper contact


130


is fed to an inverting input


134


of a third amplifier


136


through a series-connected resistor


138


. The same sum signal at the wiper contact


130


is also fed to an inverting input


140


of a fourth amplifier


142


through a separate series-connected resistor


144


. The amplifier


136


is configured as a difference amplifier with the inverting terminal


134


connected to ground through a resistor


146


. An output


148


of the amplifier


136


is also connected to the inverting terminal


134


via a feedback resistor


150


.




A positive terminal


152


of the amplifier


136


provides a common node which is connected to a group of summing resistors


156


and is also connected to ground via a resistor


154


. The level-adjusted difference signal from the wiper contact


132


is transferred to the group of summing resistors


156


through paths


160


,


162


, and


164


. This results in three separately-conditioned difference signals appearing at points A, B, and C, respectively. These conditioned difference signals are then connected to the positive terminal


152


via resistors


166


,


168


, and


170


as shown.




At point A along the path


160


, the level-adjusted difference signal from wiper contact


132


is transferred to the resistor


166


without any frequency-response modification. Accordingly, the signal at point A is merely attenuated by the voltage division between the resistor


166


and the resistor


154


. Ideally, the level of attenuation at node A will be −12 dB relative to a 0 dB reference appearing at node B. This level of attenuation is implemented by the resistor


166


having an impedance of 100 kohms and the resistor


154


having an impedance of 27.4 kohms. The signal at node B represents a filtered version of the level-adjusted difference signal appearing across a capacitor


172


which is connected to ground. The RC network of the capacitor


172


and a resistor


178


operate as a low-pass filter with a cutoff frequency determined by the time constant of the network. In accordance with a preferred embodiment, the cutoff frequency, or −3 dB frequency, of this low-pass filter is approximately 200 Hz. Accordingly, the resistor


178


is preferably 1.5 kohms and the capacitor


172


is 0.47 microfarads, and the drive resistor


168


is 20 kohms.




At node C, a high-pass filtered difference signal is fed through the drive resistor


170


to the inverting terminal


152


of the amplifier


136


. The high-pass filter is designed with a cutoff frequency of approximately 7 Khz and a relative gain to node B of −6 dB. Specifically, the capacitor


174


connected between node C and the wiper contact


132


has a value of 4700 picofarads, and the resistor


180


connected between node C and ground has a value of 3.74 kohms.




The modified difference signals present at circuit locations A, B, and C are also fed into the inverting terminal


140


of the amplifier


142


through resistors


182


,


184


and


186


, respectively. The three modified difference signals, the sum signal and the right input signal are provided to a group of summing resistors


188


which are in turn connected to the amplifier


142


. The amplifier


142


is configured as an inverting amplifier having a positive terminal


190


connected to ground and a feedback resistor


192


connected between the terminal


140


and an output


194


. To achieve proper summing of the signals by the inverting amplifier


142


, the resistor


182


has an impedance of 100 kohms, the resistor


184


has an impedance of 20 kohms, and the resistor


186


has an impedance of 44.2 kohms. The exact values of the resistors and capacitors in the stereo enhancement system may be altered as long as the proper ratios are maintained to achieve the correct level of enhancement. Other factors which may affect the value of the passive components are the power requirements of the enhancement system


80


and the characteristics of the amplifiers


104


,


122


,


136


, and


142


.




In operation, the modified difference signals are recombined to generate output signals comprised of a processed difference signal. Specifically, difference signal components found at points A, B, and C are recombined at the terminal


152


of the difference amplifier


136


, and at the terminal


140


of the amplifier


142


, to form a processed difference signal (L−R)


p


. The signal (L−R)


p


represents the difference signal which has been equalized through application of the perspective curve of FIG.


2


. Ideally then, the perspective curve is characterized by a gain of 4 db at 7 Khz, a gain of 10 dB at 125 Hz, and a gain of −2 dB at 2100 Hz.




The amplifiers


136


and


142


operate as mixing amplifiers which combine the processed difference signal with the sum signal and either the left or right input signal. The signal at the output 148 of the amplifier


136


is fed through a drive resistor


196


to produce the enhanced left output signal


60


. Similarly, the signal at the output


194


of the amplifier


142


travels through a drive resistor


198


to produce the enhanced right output signal


62


. The drive resistors will typically have an impedance on the order of 200 ohms. The enhanced left and right output signals can be expressed by the mathematical equations (1) and (2) recited above. The value of K


1


in equations (1) and (2) is controlled by the position of the wiper contact


130


and the value of K


2


is controlled by the position of the wiper contact


132


.




All of the individual circuit components depicted in

FIG. 3

may be implemented digitally through software run on a microprocessor, or through a digital signal processor. Accordingly, an individual amplifier, an equalizer, etc., may be realized by a corresponding portion of software or firmware.




An alternative embodiment of the stereo enhancement circuit


80


is depicted in FIG.


4


. The circuit of

FIG. 4

is similar to that of FIG.


3


and represents another method for applying the perspective curve


70


(shown in

FIG. 2

) to a pair of stereo audio signals. The stereo enhancement system


200


utilizes an alternative summing network configuration for generating a sum and difference signal.




In the alternative embodiment


200


, the left and right input signals


12


and


14


are still ultimately fed into the negative input of mixing amplifiers


204


and


226


. To generate the sum and difference signals, however, the left and right signals


12


and


14


are first fed through resistors


208


and


210


, respectively, and into the inverting terminal


212


of a first amplifier


214


. The amplifier


214


is configured as an inverting amplifier with a grounded input


216


and a feedback resistor


218


. The sum signal, or in this case the inverted sum signal −(L+R), is generated at the output


220


. The sum signal component is then fed to the remaining circuitry after being level-adjusted by the variable resistor


222


. Because the sum signal in the alternative embodiment is now inverted, it is fed to a non-inverting input


224


of the amplifier


226


. Accordingly, the amplifier


226


now requires a current-balancing resistor


228


placed between the non-inverting input


224


and ground potential. Similarly, a current-balancing resistor


230


is placed between an inverting input


232


and ground potential. These slight modifications to the amplifier


226


in the alternative embodiment are necessary to achieve correct summing to generate the right output signal


62


.




To generate a difference signal, an inverting summing amplifier


236


receives the left input signal and the sum signal at an inverting input


238


. More specifically, the left input signal


12


is passed through a capacitor


240


and a resistor


242


before arriving at the input


238


. Similarly, the inverted sum signal at the output


220


is passed through a capacitor


244


and a resistor


246


. The RC networks created by components


240


/


242


and components


244


/


246


provide the bass frequency filtering of the audio signal as described in conjunction with a preferred embodiment.




The amplifier


236


has a grounded non-inverting input


248


and a feedback resistor


250


. A difference signal, R−L, is generated at an output


252


with impedance values of 100 kohm for the resistors


208


,


210


,


218


, and


242


, impedance values of 200 kohm for the resistors


246


and


250


, a capacitance of 0.15 micro-farads for the capacitor


244


, and a capacitance of 0.33 micro-farads for the capacitor


240


. The difference signal is then adjusted by the variable resistor


254


and fed into the remaining circuitry. Except as described above, the remaining circuitry of

FIG. 4

is the same as that of a preferred embodiment disclosed in FIG.


3


.




The entire stereo enhancement system


80


of

FIG. 3

uses a minimum of components to implement acoustic principles and generate award-winning stereo sound. The system


80


may be constructed with only four active components, typically operational amplifiers corresponding to amplifiers


104


,


112


,


136


, and


142


. These amplifiers are readily available as a quad package on a single semiconductor chip.




Additional components needed to complete the stereo enhancement system


80


include only 29 resistors and 4 capacitors. The system


200


can also be manufactured with a quad amplifier, 4 capacitors, and only 29 resistors, including the potentiometers and output resistors. Because of its unique design, the enhancement systems


80


and


200


can be produced at minimal cost utilizing minimal component space and still provide unbelievable broadening of an existing stereo image. In fact, the entire system


80


can be formed as a single semiconductor substrate, or integrated circuit.




Apart from the embodiments depicted in

FIGS. 3 and 4

, there are conceivably additional ways to interconnect the same components obtain perspective enhancement of stereo signals. For example, a pair of amplifiers configured as difference amplifiers may receive the left and right signals, respectively, and may also each receive the sum signal. In this manner, the amplifiers would generate a left difference signal, L−R, and a right difference signal, R−L, respectively.




The perspective modification of the difference signal resulting from the enhancement systems


80


and


200


has been carefully engineered to achieve optimum results for a wide variety of applications and inputted audio signals. Adjustments by a user currently include only the level of sum and difference signals applied to the conditioning circuitry. However, it is conceivable that potentiometers could be used in place of resistors


178


and


180


to allow for adaptive equalization of the difference signal.




Through the foregoing description and accompanying drawings, the present invention has been shown to have important advantages over current stereo enhancement systems. While the above detailed description has shown, described, and pointed out the fundamental novel features of the invention, it will be understood that various omissions and substitutions and changes in the form and details of the device illustrated may be made by those skilled in the art, without departing from the spirit of the invention. Therefore, the invention should be limited in its scope only by the following claims.



Claims
  • 1. An apparatus for enhancing sound, the apparatus comprising:a high-pass filter which receives at least a first input signal and a second input signal, the filter configured to decrease the amplitude of a first set of lower frequencies in the first and second input signals relative to the amplitude of other frequencies in the first and second input signals to create at least a first modified signal and a second modified signal; a first summing circuit configured to identify sum information in the first input and second input signals; a difference circuit in communication with the high-pass filter, the difference circuit configured to identify the difference information in the first and second modified signals; an equalizer in communication with the difference circuit, the equalizer configured to spectrally shape the difference information; and a second summing circuit in communication with the first summing circuit, the equalizer and the first input signal, the second summing circuit configured to combine at least a portion of the spectrally shaped difference information, the first input signal, and at least a portion of the sum information to generate a combined signal.
  • 2. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the difference information is spectrally shaped by the equalizer by applying a perspective curve characterized by a maximum gain within a first frequency range of 100 to 150 Hz and said curve characterized by a minimum gain within a second frequency range of 1680 to 2520 Hz, wherein said curve decreases at a rate of approximately 6 decibels per octave below the first frequency range and above the first frequency range towards the second frequency range, said curve further increasing at a rate of approximately 6 decibels per octave above the second frequency range.
  • 3. The apparatus of claim 2 wherein said maximum gain and said minimum gain are separated by approximately 12 decibels.
  • 4. The apparatus of claim 2 wherein said perspective curve is adjustable to raise or lower said maximum and minimum gain frequencies with said maximum gain range and said minimum gain range.
  • 5. The apparatus of claim 1 further comprising an enhancement circuit to enhance the sum information.
  • 6. The apparatus of claim 5 wherein the enhancement circuit is a signal level adjusting circuit.
  • 7. The apparatus of claim 1 further comprising a signal level adjust circuit in communication with the difference circuit, the signal level adjust circuit configured to adjust the signal level of the difference information.
  • 8. A method of enhancing sound, comprising:receiving at least a first input signal and a second input signal; high-pass filtering the first input signal and the second input signal to decrease an amplitude of a first set of lower frequencies in the first and second input signals relative to an amplitude of other frequencies in the first and second input signals to create at least a first modified signal and a second modified signal; summing the first input signal and the second input signal to identify sum information in the first input and second input signals; subtracting the high-pass filtered first and second signals to identify a difference information in the first and second modified signals; spectrally shaping the difference information; and combining at least a portion of the spectrally shaped difference information, the first input signal and at least a portion of the sum information to generate a combined signal.
Parent Case Info

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/770,045, filed on Dec. 19, 1996, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,892,830 which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/430,751 filed on Apr. 27, 1995, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,661,808.

US Referenced Citations (61)
Number Name Date Kind
3170991 Glasgal Feb 1965 A
3246081 Edwards Apr 1966 A
3249696 Van Sickle May 1966 A
3665105 Chowning May 1972 A
3697692 Hafler Oct 1972 A
3725586 Iida Apr 1973 A
3745254 Ohta et al. Jul 1973 A
3757047 Ito et al. Sep 1973 A
3761631 Ito et al. Sep 1973 A
3772479 Hilbert Nov 1973 A
3849600 Ohshima Nov 1974 A
3885101 Ito et al. May 1975 A
3892624 Shimada Jul 1975 A
3943293 Bailey Mar 1976 A
4024344 Dolby et al. May 1977 A
4063034 Peters Dec 1977 A
4069394 Doi et al. Jan 1978 A
4118599 Iwahara et al. Oct 1978 A
4139728 Haramoto et al. Feb 1979 A
4192969 Iwahara Mar 1980 A
4218585 Carver Aug 1980 A
4219696 Kogure et al. Aug 1980 A
4237343 Kurtin et al. Dec 1980 A
4239937 Kampmann Dec 1980 A
4303800 DeFreitas Dec 1981 A
4308423 Cohen Dec 1981 A
4308424 Bice, Jr. Dec 1981 A
4309570 Carver Jan 1982 A
4332979 Fischer Jun 1982 A
4349698 Iwahara Sep 1982 A
4355203 Cohen Oct 1982 A
4356349 Robinson Oct 1982 A
4393270 van den Berg Jul 1983 A
4394536 Shima et al. Jul 1983 A
4408095 Ariga et al. Oct 1983 A
4479235 Griffis Oct 1984 A
4489432 Polk Dec 1984 A
4495637 Bruney Jan 1985 A
4497064 Polk Jan 1985 A
4503554 Davis Mar 1985 A
4567607 Bruney et al. Jan 1986 A
4569074 Polk Feb 1986 A
4589129 Blackmer et al. May 1986 A
4594610 Patel Jun 1986 A
4594730 Rosen Jun 1986 A
4748669 Klayman May 1988 A
4856064 Iwamatsu Aug 1989 A
4866774 Klayman Sep 1989 A
4953213 Tasaki et al. Aug 1990 A
5046097 Lowe et al. Sep 1991 A
5105462 Lowe et al. Apr 1992 A
5208860 Lowe et al. May 1993 A
5251260 Gates Oct 1993 A
5255326 Stevenson Oct 1993 A
5319713 Waller, Jr. et al. Jun 1994 A
5400405 Petroff Mar 1995 A
5533129 Gefvert Jul 1996 A
5661808 Klayman Aug 1997 A
5692050 Hawks Nov 1997 A
5850454 Hawks Dec 1998 A
5883962 Hawks Mar 1999 A
Foreign Referenced Citations (16)
Number Date Country
3 331 352 Mar 1985 DE
0 097 982 Jun 1983 EP
0 320 270 Dec 1988 EP
0 312 406 Apr 1989 EP
0 354 517 Aug 1989 EP
0 526 880 Feb 1993 EP
0 637 191 Feb 1995 EP
0 699 012 Feb 1996 EP
35 014 May 1965 FI
2 154 835 Sep 1985 GB
2 277 855 Nov 1994 GB
40-29936 Oct 1940 JP
43-12585 May 1943 JP
58-144989 Sep 1983 JP
61-166696 Feb 1986 JP
WO 9119407 Dec 1991 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (9)
Entry
Eargle, J., “Multichannel Stereo Matrix Systems: An Overview”, Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, pp. 552-558 (no date listed).
Stevens, S., et al., “Chapter 5: The Two-Earned Man”, Sound And Hearing, pp. 98-106 and 196, 1995.
Vaughan, D., “How We Hear Direction”, Audio, pp. 51-55, Dec. 1983.
Allison, R., “The Loudspeaker / Living Room System”, Audio, pp. 18-22, Nov. 1971.
Sundberg, J., “The Acoustics of the Singing Voice”, The Physics of Music, pp. 16-23, 1978.
Ishihara, M., “A New Analog Signal Processor For A Stereo Enhancement System”, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, vol. 37, No. 4, pp 806-813, Nov. 1991.
Kurozumi, K., et al., “A New Sound Image Broadening Control System Using a Correlation Coefficient Variation Method”, Electronics and Communications in Japan, vol. 67-A, No. 3, pp. 204-211, Mar. 1984.
Schroeder, M.R., “An Artificial Stereophonic Effect Obtained from a Single Audio Signal”, Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 74-79, Apr. 1958.
Kaufman, “Frequency Contouring For Image Enhancement,” AUDIO, pp. 34-39, Feb. 1985.
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 08/770045 Dec 1996 US
Child 09/211953 US
Parent 08/430751 Apr 1995 US
Child 08/770045 US