The description that follows relates generally to headphones. In particular, the description relates to an improved audio listening system with improved audio output and improved earphone configurations.
Commercially available headphones typically comprise a pair of earphones, or ear-cups, coupled to one another by a resilient curved band, e.g., a headband, that applies sufficient force to the ear-cups to hold the headphones in place on the user's head. Ear-cups are designed to be positioned close to the auditory canal of the user's ear to create an acoustically necessary coupling space there between. If the ear-cup is not positioned squarely on the user's outer ear, the force holding the headphone in place may be concentrated on one part of the user's ear, causing the ear to become sore. Moreover, the uniqueness of each user's ear shape creates a problem for designing ear-cups that universally provide a comfortable and close fit to the outer part of the ear. Because today's users tend to wear headphones for relatively longer periods of time, the ability to completely and comfortably adjust a headphone to each particular user is becoming as important of a feature to consumers as the acoustical parameters of the headphone.
In commercially available headphones, the ear-cup design may produce different acoustic effects. For example, open-back ear-cup designs, e.g., where the back of the ear-cup is open, generate a more natural or speaker-like sound and provide a more spacious “soundscape,” i.e. the perception of distance from the audio source. However, open-back ear-cups tend to leak more sound and let more ambient sounds into the headphone. In contrast, closed-back designs, e.g., where the back of the ear-cup is closed, may effectively block out ambient noise (depending on the model, between 8-32 dB). However, closed-back ear-cups have a smaller soundscape, giving the wearer a perception that the sound is coming from within their head.
Many of today's headphone users also require greater portability from a headphone, as the combination of the Internet and smart phones have made music, video, and online applications available virtually anywhere and at anytime. Among commercially available headband type headphones, a few of them can be folded into a compact form when not in use, thereby protecting the headphones when not in use and increasing their portability. In addition, with greater mobility comes increased visibility, and so, for some users, headphones have become a form of artistic expression, making the aesthetic appeal of the headphone an important feature as well.
An example of a conventional headphone may be found in U.S. Pat. No. 4,965,836 to Eugene M. Andre et. al., which is directed to a headphone with dual-transducers in each ear-cup with a closed-back design. The '836 patent describes a headphone that uses a bellows member with an accordion-type cross section to seal a sizable, flexible gap between the two sides of each ear-cup, i.e., a faceplate and a cover, in order to enclose and direct sound waves generated by the dual-transducers. However, because the accordion-shaped bellows member allows flexibility, or movement, between the two ends of the ear-cup, the total volume enclosed within each ear-cup is independently variable depending on how much pressure is applied to each ear-cup while the user is wearing the headphone. As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the volume, or amount of air, within a closed-back ear-cup influences the acoustic characteristics of the sound produced by the transducer included therein. Thus, it would seem that the sound quality of the headphone in the '836 patent is at least partially dependent on how much or how little each bellows member is compressed when the ear-cups are placed against the user's ears. In addition to producing inconsistent sound quality, this bellows member in the '836 patent detracts from the aesthetic appeal and portability of the headphone by increasing the bulk and thickness of the ear-cups.
Accordingly, there still exists a need in the art for a slimmer, sleeker headphone design that provides comfortable long wear, superior sound quality, and convenient portability.
The present invention is defined by the appended claims. This description summarizes some aspects of the present embodiments and should not be used to limit the claims.
The foregoing problems are solved and a technical advance is achieved by an audio listening device having ear-cups that are pivotably engaged to a headband assembly by an engagement structure positioned within a damper rim.
One embodiment includes a headphone assembly. The headband assembly includes at least one end and an ear-cup assembly pivotably engaged to the headband assembly by an engagement structure positioned proximate to the at least one end of the headband assembly. The ear-cup assembly includes a cap and a housing, wherein the cap and the housing are connected to form an enclosed space inside the ear-cup assembly. The headphone assembly may further include a transducer configured to produce sound and positioned within the enclosed space of the ear-cup assembly. The headphone assembly may further include a damper rim positioned between the ear-cup assembly and the at least one end of the headband assembly, wherein the damper rim covers the engagement structure and is engaged to the ear-cup assembly and the at least one end of the headband assembly.
Other articles of manufacture, features, and advantages of the present invention will be, or will become, apparent to one having ordinary skill in the art upon examination of the following drawings and detailed description. It is intended that all such additional articles of manufacture, features, and advantages included within this description be within the scope of the present invention, and be protected by the accompanying claims.
The invention can be better understood with reference to the following drawings. The components in the drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon clearly illustrating the principles of the present invention. In the drawings, like reference numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the several views.
Illustrative and exemplary embodiments of the invention are described in further detail below with reference to and in conjunction with the figures.
The description that follows describes, illustrates and exemplifies one or more particular embodiments of the present invention in accordance with its principles. This description is not provided to limit the invention to the embodiments described herein, but rather to explain and teach the principles of the invention in such a way to enable one of ordinary skill in the art to understand these principles and, with that understanding, be able to apply them to practice not only the embodiments described herein, but also other embodiments that may come to mind in accordance with these principles. The scope of the disclosure is intended to cover all such embodiments that may fall within the scope of the appended claims, either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents.
In this application, the use of the disjunctive is intended to include the conjunctive. The use of definite or indefinite articles is not intended to indicate cardinality. In particular, a reference to “the” object or “a” and “an” object is intended to denote also one of a possible plurality of such objects.
At least one of the ear-cups 102 includes a cable port 106. In practice, by plugging a headphone cable 108 into the cable port 106, the headphone wearer may use the headphone 100 to listen to audio signals being transmitted through the headphone cable 108. In one embodiment, each of the ear-cups 102 includes a cable port 106, and the cable ports 106 operate as input/output cable ports for inputting audio signals through one cable port 106 and outputting audio signals through the second cable port 106 to, for example, a second headphone set (not shown). Other mechanisms for transmitting signals to (and from) headphone 100 may be provided, such as alternative locations for cable port(s) 106 or the integration of wireless connectivity (such as, e.g., Bluetooth), without departing from the description herein.
Referring additionally to
The friction-based adjust mechanism, provided at both ends of the headband 110, is a mechanism for adjusting the size of the headphone 100 so as to adapt to the size of the wearer's head. To that end, the sliding members 114 are formed so as to create a biasing frictional force when they are slid relatively to the headband 110. Before the headphone 100 is fitted onto the wearer's head, each of the sliding members 114 can be substantially hidden within the corresponding channel. In this position, the distance between each of the headphone units 102 and the apex of the headband 110 is minimal, thus corresponding to the smallest head size that can comfortably accept or wear the headband 110. When the wearer puts on the headphone 100 by holding the earphone units 102 in his/her hands, he/she can adjust the headphone 100 by simply applying a force slightly greater than the frictional forces exerted by the sliding members 114 onto the channel to slide down the earphone units 102 towards his/her ears.
As shown in
Now referring to
As shown in
Each engagement structure 116 is positioned within and covered by a damper rim 126 to protect the engagement structure 116 from exposure to dust and other foreign particles. By covering the engagement structures 116, damper rims 126 also provide a smooth finish to the headphone 100 by hiding the engagement structures 116 from view. The damper rims 126 also couple the ear-cup 102 to the arms 112 by serving as resilient and flexible connection between the ear-cup housing 120 and the inner housing 124 of the arms 112. The damper rims 126 are positioned vertically, or substantially parallel to the outer cap 128 of the ear-cups 102, and operate to dampen movement of the ear-cups 102 and to generally maintain the position of the ear-cup 102 relative to the arms 112 and the headband 110, without providing undue pressure against the wearer's outer ear. Moreover, due to its slim profile, the damper rims 126 also reduce a thickness of the ear-cups 102, thereby giving the headphone 100 a sleek appearance overall and increasing its aesthetic appeal.
In one embodiment, the damper rim 126 may be designed as a bellows. Damper rims 126 may be composed of a suitable flexible and resilient material, such as, e.g., rubber or polyester foam. As shown in
In one embodiment, each ear-cup 102 is acoustically enclosed on the back-side by the ear-cup housing 120, except for a small hole to allow routing of a cable 130 that electrically couples each ear-cup 102 to the headphone cable 108 connected to cable port 106. By acoustically sealing the back of each ear-cup 102 with ear-cup housing 120, the sound emitted from the rear of the transducer 132 is confined within each ear-cup 102, thereby enhancing the acoustic characteristics of the headphone 100. Each ear-cup 102 includes a transducer 132 for converting electrical signals into sound (for example, electrical signals received via the headphone cable 108). In part, transducer 132 produces sound by vibrating and pushing air forward. Ear-cup caps 134 cover each transducer 132 to protect the transducer 132 from the elements, such as dust, small particles, or other contamination. Each ear-cup cap 134 is positioned on a front-side of the ear-cup 102, so as to be directly opposite of the ear-cup housing 120, thereby creating an enclosed space around the transducer 132. The shape and size of this enclosed space determines, in part, the acoustic characteristics of the sound produced by the transducer 132. This enclosed space defines a fixed volume since the ear-cup housing 120 and the ear-cup cap 134 are relatively rigid components, i.e. not composed of flexible materials that significantly expand or contract when pressure is applied. The transducer 132 may be acoustically configured to produce optimal sound within the fixed volume formed by the enclosed space. As will be appreciated, internal sound reflections within the ear-cup housing 120 can degrade sound quality by producing standing waves and other forms of sound diffraction. To address these and other known issues, the ear-cup housing 120 may be constructed from absorptive materials (e.g., wool, synthetic fiber batting, etc.), and/or the internal shape of the space enclosed within each ear-cup 102 may be designed to reflect sounds away from the ear-cup cap 134, where they may then be absorbed. Each ear-cup cap 134 may include a specifically designed grid-like surface for enabling sound to radiate from the transducer 132 towards the user's ear. In one embodiment, the grid-like surface of the ear-cup cap 134 may be comprised of a wire or fabric mesh.
Cushioning doughnut-shaped ear pads 136 are wrapped circumferentially around the sound-radiating side of each ear-cup 102 for providing comfortable positioning on the user's ear. Due to the flexibility provided by the engagement structures 116 and the bow shape of the arm 112, when the headphone 100 is mounted on the wearer's head, each of the ear-cups 102 is completely self-adjustable with respect to the wearer's ear to become substantially parallel to the ear, thereby adopting an optimum position which minimizes the travel of the sound outside the ear pad 136. As such, the cushioned ear-cups 102 provide very comfortable listening, superior passive sound isolation, and minimize ear fatigue due to extended wear.
Referring additionally to
Accordingly, the above-discussed headphone 100 provides a sleek, space-saving audio listening device that can be comfortably worn by the wearer for an extended listening period, when compared to commercially available headphones. By pivotably connecting ear-caps 102 to arms 112 using engagement mechanisms 116, and covering the engagement mechanisms 116 with flexible damper rims 126, a comfortable, substantially pressureless, and precise fitting solution to the wearer's ear is achieved. Furthermore, as discussed above, several features are provided to obtain a slimmer and sleeker design with convenient portability. For example, damper rims 126 not only provide a protective cover for the engagement mechanisms 116, but also provide an element of aesthetic appeal by mimicking the look, and color, of a traditional speaker cone surround. Moreover, the size and positioning of the damper rims 126 and the placement of batteries 140 in the arms 112 reduces the overall thickness of the ear-cups 102, thereby increasing the commercial appeal and usability of the headphone 100.
It should be emphasized that the above-described embodiments, particularly, any “preferred” embodiments, are possible examples of implementations, merely set forth for a clear understanding of the principles of the invention. Many variations and modifications may be made to the above-described embodiment(s) of the invention without substantially departing from the spirit and principles of the invention. All such modifications are intended to be included herein within the scope of this disclosure and protected by the following claims.
This application is a national stage patent application of PCT/US11/67045 which was filed on Dec. 22, 2011, that claims priority from U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 61/429,426, filed Jan. 3, 2011, both of which are incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2011/067045 | 12/22/2011 | WO | 00 | 9/11/2013 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2012/094176 | 7/12/2012 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1066511 | Markoff | Jul 1913 | A |
2025385 | Grace et al. | Dec 1935 | A |
2149341 | Harrison | Mar 1939 | A |
2336669 | Brown et al. | Dec 1943 | A |
2481387 | Bonecutter | Sep 1949 | A |
2487787 | Brown | Nov 1949 | A |
2653193 | Anderson | Sep 1953 | A |
2993962 | Hothem | Jul 1961 | A |
3104398 | Palmaer | Sep 1963 | A |
D203677 | Spilman et al. | Feb 1966 | S |
3902120 | Dascal et al. | Aug 1975 | A |
D244300 | Besasie | May 1977 | S |
4048453 | Seidel | Sep 1977 | A |
4173715 | Gosman | Nov 1979 | A |
D254183 | Doodson | Feb 1980 | S |
D254876 | Reitenga | May 1980 | S |
4609786 | Omoto et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4634816 | O'Malley et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4875233 | Derhaag | Oct 1989 | A |
4965836 | Andre et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
D313092 | Nilsson | Dec 1990 | S |
5018599 | Dohi et al. | May 1991 | A |
5035005 | Hung | Jul 1991 | A |
D328074 | Yamazaki et al. | Jul 1992 | S |
D328461 | Daido et al. | Aug 1992 | S |
D338010 | Yamatogi | Aug 1993 | S |
D351172 | Nakamura et al. | Oct 1994 | S |
D353821 | Hammer et al. | Dec 1994 | S |
5369857 | Sacherman et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
D358389 | Isono | May 1995 | S |
D375825 | Whidden | Nov 1996 | S |
D403128 | Scanlon et al. | Dec 1998 | S |
D420356 | Suzuki | Feb 2000 | S |
D422592 | Deguchi | Apr 2000 | S |
6081604 | Hikichi et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
D430140 | Roman | Aug 2000 | S |
D435249 | Yasutomi | Dec 2000 | S |
6163615 | Callahan | Dec 2000 | A |
6195839 | Patterson et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
D457512 | Yoneda | May 2002 | S |
6449806 | Engelhard et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
D468723 | Pham | Jan 2003 | S |
6542615 | Ito | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6611963 | Woo et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
D484485 | Matsuoka | Dec 2003 | S |
6654966 | Rolla et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
D484868 | Suzuki | Jan 2004 | S |
6678897 | Lindgren | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6724906 | Naksen et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
D491163 | Green | Jun 2004 | S |
D502938 | Tokioka | Mar 2005 | S |
D504414 | Yoshida | Apr 2005 | S |
D504883 | Jacobson et al. | May 2005 | S |
D512381 | Sirichai et al. | Dec 2005 | S |
D512708 | Harris, Jr. et al. | Dec 2005 | S |
D512981 | Jacobson et al. | Dec 2005 | S |
D514086 | Skulley | Jan 2006 | S |
D517043 | Jacobson et al. | Mar 2006 | S |
D517528 | Skulley | Mar 2006 | S |
7072483 | Lenhard-Backhaus | Jul 2006 | B2 |
D532407 | Motoishi | Nov 2006 | S |
D534155 | Obata | Dec 2006 | S |
D534156 | Obata | Dec 2006 | S |
7172052 | Lenhard-Backhaus | Feb 2007 | B2 |
D539788 | Thompson | Apr 2007 | S |
D540301 | Obata | Apr 2007 | S |
D540303 | Rausch | Apr 2007 | S |
D540778 | Thompson | Apr 2007 | S |
D541255 | Taylor | Apr 2007 | S |
D541256 | Rausch | Apr 2007 | S |
D541257 | Thursfield | Apr 2007 | S |
D552077 | Brunner | Oct 2007 | S |
D557684 | Pundsack et al. | Dec 2007 | S |
D560654 | Feng | Jan 2008 | S |
D563382 | Wikel | Mar 2008 | S |
D563995 | Deguchi | Mar 2008 | S |
D570825 | Schultz et al. | Jun 2008 | S |
D582890 | Koza | Dec 2008 | S |
D584715 | Brennwald | Jan 2009 | S |
D585870 | Zheng | Feb 2009 | S |
D585871 | Lee | Feb 2009 | S |
D585872 | Lee | Feb 2009 | S |
D588098 | Kurihara | Mar 2009 | S |
D588100 | Densho | Mar 2009 | S |
D591263 | Shimizu | Apr 2009 | S |
D592182 | Sanguinetti | May 2009 | S |
D592640 | Tkachuk | May 2009 | S |
D593995 | Shimizu | Jun 2009 | S |
D600674 | Brennwald | Sep 2009 | S |
D602906 | Groves et al. | Oct 2009 | S |
D603370 | Suzuki | Nov 2009 | S |
D603371 | Boateng et al. | Nov 2009 | S |
D616865 | Marchand et al. | Jun 2010 | S |
D617769 | Birger | Jun 2010 | S |
D617771 | Groves et al. | Jun 2010 | S |
7735154 | Gellis et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
D625705 | Ohori et al. | Oct 2010 | S |
D632668 | Brunner et al. | Feb 2011 | S |
D633896 | Kondo et al. | Mar 2011 | S |
D635959 | Hutchieson | Apr 2011 | S |
D637176 | Brunner et al. | May 2011 | S |
D637998 | Brunner et al. | May 2011 | S |
D637999 | Brunner et al. | May 2011 | S |
D638000 | Hoggarth | May 2011 | S |
D639776 | Arimoto | Jun 2011 | S |
D641725 | Chong et al. | Jul 2011 | S |
D648330 | Fischer | Nov 2011 | S |
D652017 | Groves et al. | Jan 2012 | S |
D652405 | Lee et al. | Jan 2012 | S |
D652406 | Lee et al. | Jan 2012 | S |
8098873 | Furuya et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
D654471 | Fischer | Feb 2012 | S |
D654472 | Fischer | Feb 2012 | S |
8139807 | Reiss et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
D657344 | Brunner et al. | Apr 2012 | S |
D657345 | Brunner et al. | Apr 2012 | S |
D657776 | Lee et al. | Apr 2012 | S |
D660823 | Hardi et al. | May 2012 | S |
D660824 | Hardi et al. | May 2012 | S |
D660826 | Brunner et al. | May 2012 | S |
D662490 | McSweyn | Jun 2012 | S |
D663716 | Hardi et al. | Jul 2012 | S |
D668633 | Enquist et al. | Oct 2012 | S |
D673520 | Tan | Jan 2013 | S |
D674767 | Brunner et al. | Jan 2013 | S |
D677647 | Lee et al. | Mar 2013 | S |
D677648 | Lee et al. | Mar 2013 | S |
8422718 | Santiago | Apr 2013 | B2 |
D683329 | Hagelin | May 2013 | S |
D689843 | Lee | Sep 2013 | S |
D691112 | Brunner et al. | Oct 2013 | S |
D691579 | Lee et al. | Oct 2013 | S |
D695263 | Mogili | Dec 2013 | S |
D696226 | Brunner et al. | Dec 2013 | S |
8605935 | Huang | Dec 2013 | B1 |
20030182713 | Rolla | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030210801 | Naksen et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040216946 | Lenhard-Backhaus | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050053255 | Harris et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050226452 | Amae et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060001307 | Embach | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060062417 | Tachikawa | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060104471 | Tsunoda et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20080056525 | Fujiwara et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20090220118 | Meier et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100128884 | Sapiejewski et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100284558 | Kimura et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110206216 | Brunner et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110216909 | Sapiejewski et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2072035 | Sep 1981 | GB |
D1318386 | May 1986 | JP |
D1406347 | Oct 1987 | JP |
D1430542 | Mar 1988 | JP |
200631444 | Jun 1994 | JP |
300476152 | Jan 2008 | KR |
2007103561 | Sep 2007 | WO |
2012094176 | Jul 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US11/67045 dated Sep. 27, 2012. |
Office Action dated Dec. 10, 2010 for Russian Patent Application No. 2010501890. |
Search Report dated Mar. 31, 2011 for Taiwan patent Application No. 099303306. |
Taiwan Office Action for Taiwan Application No. 101303990 dated Aug. 26, 2013. |
Taiwan Office Action for Taiwan Application No. 101301117 dated Aug. 26, 2013. |
Taiwan Office Action for Taiwan Application No. 102302000 dated Aug. 26, 2013. |
Unpublished pending U.S. Appl. No. 29/471,109, filed Oct. 28, 2013 a copy of which is not being furnished herewith, pursuant to the Commissioner's Notice dated Sep. 21, 2004. |
Unpublished pending U.S. Appl. No. 29/475,634, filed Dec. 4, 2013 a copy of which is not being furnished herewith, pursuant to the Commissioner's Notice dated Sep. 21, 2004. |
Unpublished pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/925613, filed Jun. 24, 2013 a copy of which is not being furnished herewith, pursuant to the Commissioner's Notice dated Sep. 21, 2004. |
Unpublished pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/517035, filed Sep. 11, 2013 a copy of which is not being furnished herewith, pursuant to the Commissioner's Notice dated Sep. 21, 2004. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130343591 A1 | Dec 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61429426 | Jan 2011 | US |