Augmented conversational understanding architecture

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10642934
  • Patent Number
    10,642,934
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, March 31, 2011
    13 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 5, 2020
    4 years ago
Abstract
An augmented conversational understanding architecture may be provided. Upon receiving a natural language phrase from a user, the phrase may be translated into a search phrase and a search action may be performed on the search phrase.
Description
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This patent application is also related to and filed concurrently with U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/076,862 entitled “Augmented Conversational Understanding Agent,” filed on Mar. 31, 2011, now issued U.S. Pat. No. 9,760,566; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/077,233 entitled “Conversational Dialog Learning and Correction,” filed on Mar. 31, 2011; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/077,303, entitled “Personalization of Queries, Conversations, and Searches,” filed on Mar. 31, 2011, now issued U.S. Pat. No. 9,858,343; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/077,368, entitled “Combined Activation for Natural User Interface Systems,” filed on Mar. 31, 2011, now issued U.S. Pat. No. 9,298,287; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/077,396, entitled “Task Driven User Intents,” filed on Mar. 31, 2011, now issued U.S. Pat. No. 9,842,168; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/077,455 entitled “Location-Based Conversational Understanding,” filed on Mar. 31, 2011, now issued U.S. Pat. No. 9,244,984; which are assigned to the same assignee as the present application and expressly incorporated herein, in their entirety, by reference.


BACKGROUND

An augmented conversational understanding architecture may provide a mechanism for facilitating natural language understanding of user queries and conversations. In some situations, personal assistant programs and/or search engines often require specialized formatting and syntax. For example, a user's query of “I want to go see ‘Inception’ around 7” may be ineffective at communicating the user's true intentions when provided to a conventional system. Such systems may generally be incapable of deriving the context that the user is referring to a movie, and that the user desires results informing them of local theatres showing that movie around 7:00.


SUMMARY

This Summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This Summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter. Nor is this Summary intended to be used to limit the claimed subject matter's scope.


An augmented conversational understanding architecture may be provided. Upon receiving a natural language phrase from a user, the phrase may be translated into a search phrase and a search action may be performed on the search phrase.


Both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description provide examples and are explanatory only. Accordingly, the foregoing general description and the following detailed description should not be considered to be restrictive. Further, features or variations may be provided in addition to those set forth herein. For example, embodiments may be directed to various feature combinations and sub-combinations described in the detailed description.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this disclosure, illustrate various embodiments of the present invention. In the drawings:



FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an operating environment;



FIGS. 2A-2B are block diagrams illustrating an interface for providing an augmented conversational understanding architecture;



FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating an interface for providing feedback to an augmented conversational understanding architecture;



FIG. 4 is a flow chart of a method for providing an augmented conversational understanding architecture; and



FIG. 5 is a block diagram of a system including a computing device.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The following detailed description refers to the accompanying drawings. Wherever possible, the same reference numbers are used in the drawings and the following description to refer to the same or similar elements. While embodiments of the invention may be described, modifications, adaptations, and other implementations are possible. For example, substitutions, additions, or modifications may be made to the elements illustrated in the drawings, and the methods described herein may be modified by substituting, reordering, or adding stages to the disclosed methods. Accordingly, the following detailed description does not limit the invention. Instead, the proper scope of the invention is defined by the appended claims.


An augmented conversational understanding architecture may facilitate natural language understanding of user queries and conversations. The architecture may allow for determining the context of the query and for inferring the user's intentions. The architecture may use the words of the natural language query to determine the context of the conversation, to estimate the user intents, and to form appropriate additional queries using a suitable search agent.


Spoken dialog systems (SDS) enable people to interact with computers with their voice. The primary component that drives the SDS may comprise a dialog manager: this component manages the dialog-based conversation with the user. The dialog manager may determine the intention of the user through a combination of multiple sources of input, such as speech recognition and natural language understanding component outputs, context from the prior dialog turns, user context, and/or results returned from a knowledge base (e.g., search engine). After determining the intention, the dialog manager may take an action, such as displaying the final results to the user and/or continuing in a dialog with the user to satisfy their intent.



FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an operating environment 100 comprising a server 105. Server 105 may comprise assorted computing resources and/or software modules such as a spoken dialog system (SDS) 110 comprising a dialog manager 111, a personal assistant program 112, a context database 116, and/or a search agent 118. SDS 110 may receive queries and/or action requests from users over network 120. Such queries may be transmitted, for example, from a user device 130 such as a computer and/or cellular phone. Network 120 may comprise, for example, a private network, a cellular data network, and/or a public network such as the Internet.



FIG. 2A is a block diagram of an interface 200 for providing an augmented conversational understanding architecture. Interface 200 may comprise a user input panel 210 and a personal assistant panel 220. User input panel 210 may display translated user queries and/or action request such as a user statement 230. User statement 230 may comprise, for example, a result from a speech-to-text conversion received from a user of user device 130. Personal assistant panel 220 may comprise a plurality of action suggestions 240(A)-(C) derived from a context state associated with the user and user statement 230.



FIG. 2B is a further illustration of interface 200 comprising an updated display after a user selects one of plurality of action suggestions 240(A). For example, plurality of action suggestions 240(A)-(C) may comprise suggested activities in response to a user's expressed intent to “go out tonight.” Upon selection of action suggestion 240(A), indicating the user's intent to go out to eat in this example, personal assistant panel 220 may be updated with a second plurality of action suggestions 250(A)-(C) associated with further defining the user's intent. For example, second plurality of action suggestions 250(A)-(C) may comprise different suggested cuisines that the user may want to eat. Consistent with embodiments of the invention, a context state associated with the user may be used to provide and/or order second plurality of action suggestions 250(A)-(C). For example, the context state may comprise a history of previous restaurants visited and/or liked by the user, and the types of cuisine may be ordered according to those preferences.



FIG. 3 is a block diagram of interface 200 illustrating the provision of feedback to an augmented conversational understanding architecture. The user may change all and/or a portion of user statement 230 into a modified user statement 310. For example, the user may use a mouse, stylus, keyboard, voice command, and/or other input mechanism to select the previously translated word “out” and modify that word to “outside.” Personal assistant panel 220 may then be updated with an updated plurality of suggested actions 320(A)-(B) according to modified user statement 310.



FIG. 4 is a flow chart setting forth the general stages involved in a method 400 consistent with an embodiment of the invention for providing can ERP context-aware environment. Method 400 may be implemented using a computing device 400 as described in more detail below with respect to FIG. 4. Ways to implement the stages of method 400 will be described in greater detail below. Method 400 may begin at starting block 405 and proceed to stage 410 where computing device 500 may receive an action request. For example, SDS 110 may receive a request from user device 130 comprising a user's spoken query to “find a place to eat.”


Method 400 may then advance to stage 415 where computing device 500 may gather a context state associated with the user. The context state may comprise, for example, a role associated with the user, at least one previous user objective, at least one previous user action request, a location of the user, a time, a date, a category associated with the first action request from the user, a data type associated with the first action request from the user, and/or a data category associated with previous user action requests. Such information may be stored in context database 116 of SDS 110.


Method 400 may then advance to stage 420 where computing device 500 may create a plurality of objectives according to the context state. For example, SDS may identify “dining” as a domain associated with the query “find a place to eat.” Objectives such as finding a nearby restaurant according to the user's location and/or creating reservations according to a number of users involved in a conversation may thus be generated.


Method 400 may then advance to stage 425 where computing device 500 may execute the requested action according to the context state. For example, in response to the user query “find a place to eat”, translator module 114 may command search agent 118 to search for nearby restaurants to the user. The results of this search my be transmitted back to user device 130 by personal assistant program 112 and displayed, for example, in personal assistant panel 220 of interface 200.


Method 400 may then advance to stage 430 where computing device 500 may update the context state. For example, the current selection of choices comprising plurality of action suggestions 240(A)-(C) may each be associated with a predicted probability in the user's context state. The user's next action may be used to adjust these predicted probabilities for application to future queries.


Method 400 may then advance to stage 435 where computing device 500 may determine whether the next requested action is associated with accomplishing the current objective. For example, SDS 110 may compare the user's context state to a plurality of user context states each associated with the current objective. Previous users who issued the same action/query request may have taken similar next actions, and a different action by the user at this stage may indicate that an incorrect objective has been predicted. If the user's next action does not comport with the predicted objective, method 400 may return to stage 420 where a new set of objectives may be generated.


Otherwise, method 400 may advance to stage 440 where computing device 500 may determine if the predicted objective is completed. For example, if SDS 110 receives a requested action to finalize a dinner reservation and arrange a taxi, the objective of making dinner plans may be determined to be complete and method 400 may end at stage 442. If the action comprises selecting a restaurant to make reservations at, but a time has not been selected, the predicted objective may be determined not to be complete.


If the predicted objective is incomplete at stage 440, method 400 may then advance to stage 445 where computing device 500 may provide a next suggested action. For example, where a restaurant is selected but a time is not, personal assistant program 112 may request a reservation time from the user.


Method 400 may then advance to stage 450 where computing device 500 may receive a next action from the user. For example, the user may input a selection of 7:00 for the reservation time and transmit it to SDS 110. Method 400 may then return to stage 425 and execute the next requested action as described above.


An embodiment consistent with the invention may comprise a system for providing a context-aware environment. The system may comprise a memory storage and a processing unit coupled to the memory storage. The processing unit may be operative to receive a natural language phrase from a user, translate the natural language phrase into a search phrase, and perform a search action according to the search phrase. The natural language phrase may be received, for example, as a plurality of text words and/or as an audio stream. The search phrase may comprise at least one contextual semantic concept not contained in the natural language phrase. The processing unit may be further operative to receive a plurality of search results according to the search action and provide the plurality of search results to the user. The processing unit may be further operative to provide the plurality of results to a plurality of users. The natural language phrase may be derived, for example, from a conversation among the plurality of users. The processing unit may be further operative to analyze a plurality of application programming interfaces (APIs) and identify at least one required parameter for each of the plurality of APIs. Each of the plurality of APIs may be associated with a website search function. Being operative to translate the natural language phrase into the search phrase may comprise the processing unit being operative to identify a context associated with the natural language phrase, determine whether at least one of the plurality of APIs is associated with the identified context, and, if so, translate at least one word of the natural language phrase into the at least one required parameter associated with the at least one of the plurality of APIs. Being operative to perform the search action may comprise the processing unit being operative to call the at least one of the plurality of APIs with the at least one required parameter.


Another embodiment consistent with the invention may comprise a system for providing a context-aware environment. The system may comprise a memory storage and a processing unit coupled to the memory storage. The processing unit may be operative to receive a natural language phrase from a user, create a context state associated with the natural language phrase, translate the natural language phrase into an executable action, identify a domain associated with the executable action according to the identified context, and performing the executable action within the identified domain. The executable action may comprise, for example, a search action, a data creation action, a data modification action, and a communication action. The processing unit may be further operative to provide at least one suggested next action to the user. The processing unit may be further operative to receive a second natural language phrase from the user, determine whether the second natural language phrase is associated with the at least one suggested next action, and, if so, perform the at least one suggested next action. In response to determining that the second natural language phrase is not associated with the at least one suggested next action, the processing unit may be operative to providing at least one second suggested next action to the user. The processing unit may be further operative to update the context state according to the second natural language phrase.


Yet another embodiment consistent with the invention may comprise a system for providing a context-aware environment. The system may comprise a memory storage and a processing unit coupled to the memory storage. The processing unit may be operative to create a plurality of objectives, gather a context state associated with a user, provide a suggested action associated with at least one of the plurality of objectives according to the context state, receive an action request from the user, execute the requested action according to the context state, and determine whether the action is associated with accomplishing the at least one of the plurality of objectives. In response to determining that the action is associated with accomplishing the at least one of the plurality of objectives, the processing unit may be operative to update the context state, update a probability associated with the suggested action, and determine whether the context state comprises a completed objective of the plurality of objectives. In response to determining that the context state does not comprise the completed objective, the processing unit may be operative to provide at least one second suggested action.


The context state may comprise, for example, a role associated with the user, at least one previous user objective, at least one previous user action request, a location of the user, a time, a date, a category associated with the first action request from the user, a data type associated with the first action request from the user, and a data category associated with previous user action requests. Being operative to determine whether the context state is associated with accomplishing the at least one predicted objective may comprise the processing unit being operative to compare the context state to a plurality of user context states each associated with the at least one of the plurality of objectives.



FIG. 5 is a block diagram of a system including computing device 500. Consistent with an embodiment of the invention, the aforementioned memory storage and processing unit may be implemented in a computing device, such as computing device 500 of FIG. 5. Any suitable combination of hardware, software, or firmware may be used to implement the memory storage and processing unit. For example, the memory storage and processing unit may be implemented with computing device 500 or any of other computing devices 518, in combination with computing device 500. The aforementioned system, device, and processors are examples and other systems, devices, and processors may comprise the aforementioned memory storage and processing unit, consistent with embodiments of the invention. Furthermore, computing device 500 may comprise an operating environment for system 100 as described above. System 100 may operate in other environments and is not limited to computing device 500.


With reference to FIG. 5, a system consistent with an embodiment of the invention may include a computing device, such as computing device 500. In a basic configuration, computing device 500 may include at least one processing unit 502 and a system memory 504. Depending on the configuration and type of computing device, system memory 504 may comprise, but is not limited to, volatile (e.g., random access memory (RAM)), non-volatile (e.g., read-only memory (ROM)), flash memory, or any combination. System memory 504 may include operating system 505, one or more programming modules 506, and may include personal assistant program 112. Operating system 505, for example, may be suitable for controlling computing device 400's operation. Furthermore, embodiments of the invention may be practiced in conjunction with a graphics library, other operating systems, or any other application program and is not limited to any particular application or system. This basic configuration is illustrated in FIG. 5 by those components within a dashed line 508.


Computing device 500 may have additional features or functionality. For example, computing device 500 may also include additional data storage devices (removable and/or non-removable) such as, for example, magnetic disks, optical disks, or tape. Such additional storage is illustrated in FIG. 5 by a removable storage 509 and a non-removable storage 510. Computer storage media may include volatile and nonvolatile, removable and non-removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage of information, such as computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules, or other data. System memory 504, removable storage 509, and non-removable storage 510 are all computer storage media examples (i.e., memory storage). Computer storage media may include, but is not limited to, RAM, ROM, electrically erasable read-only memory (EEPROM), flash memory or other memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disks (DVD) or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to store information and which can be accessed by computing device 500. Any such computer storage media may be part of device 500. Computing device 500 may also have input device(s) 512 such as a keyboard, a mouse, a pen, a sound input device, a touch input device, etc. Output device(s) 514 such as a display, speakers, a printer, etc. may also be included. The aforementioned devices are examples and others may be used.


Computing device 500 may also contain a communication connection 516 that may allow device 500 to communicate with other computing devices 518, such as over a network in a distributed computing environment, for example, an intranet or the Internet. Communication connection 516 is one example of communication media. Communication media may typically be embodied by computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules, or other data in a modulated data signal, such as a carrier wave or other transport mechanism, and includes any information delivery media. The term “modulated data signal” may describe a signal that has one or more characteristics set or changed in such a manner as to encode information in the signal. By way of example, and not limitation, communication media may include wired media such as a wired network or direct-wired connection, and wireless media such as acoustic, radio frequency (RF), infrared, and other wireless media. The term computer readable media as used herein may include both storage media and communication media.


As stated above, a number of program modules and data files may be stored in system memory 504, including operating system 505. While executing on processing unit 502, programming modules 506 (e.g., personal assistant program 112) may perform processes including, for example, one or more of method 500's stages as described above. The aforementioned process is an example, and processing unit 502 may perform other processes. Other programming modules that may be used in accordance with embodiments of the present invention may include electronic mail and contacts applications, word processing applications, spreadsheet applications, database applications, slide presentation applications, drawing or computer-aided application programs, etc.


Generally, consistent with embodiments of the invention, program modules may include routines, programs, components, data structures, and other types of structures that may perform particular tasks or that may implement particular abstract data types. Moreover, embodiments of the invention may be practiced with other computer system configurations, including hand-held devices, multiprocessor systems, microprocessor-based or programmable consumer electronics, minicomputers, mainframe computers, and the like. Embodiments of the invention may also be practiced in distributed computing environments where tasks are performed by remote processing devices that are linked through a communications network. In a distributed computing environment, program modules may be located in both local and remote memory storage devices.


Furthermore, embodiments of the invention may be practiced in an electrical circuit comprising discrete electronic elements, packaged or integrated electronic chips containing logic gates, a circuit utilizing a microprocessor, or on a single chip containing electronic elements or microprocessors. Embodiments of the invention may also be practiced using other technologies capable of performing logical operations such as, for example, AND, OR, and NOT, including but not limited to mechanical, optical, fluidic, and quantum technologies. In addition, embodiments of the invention may be practiced within a general purpose computer or in any other circuits or systems.


Embodiments of the invention, for example, may be implemented as a computer process (method), a computing system, or as an article of manufacture, such as a computer program product or computer readable media. The computer program product may be a computer storage media readable by a computer system and encoding a computer program of instructions for executing a computer process. The computer program product may also be a propagated signal on a carrier readable by a computing system and encoding a computer program of instructions for executing a computer process. Accordingly, the present invention may be embodied in hardware and/or in software (including firmware, resident software, micro-code, etc.). In other words, embodiments of the present invention may take the form of a computer program product on a computer-usable or computer-readable storage medium having computer-usable or computer-readable program code embodied in the medium for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system. A computer-usable or computer-readable medium may be any medium that can contain, store, communicate, propagate, or transport the program for use by or in connection with the instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.


The computer-usable or computer-readable medium may be, for example but not limited to, an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system, apparatus, device, or propagation medium. More specific computer-readable medium examples (a non-exhaustive list), the computer-readable medium may include the following: an electrical connection having one or more wires, a portable computer diskette, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or Flash memory), an optical fiber, and a portable compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM). Note that the computer-usable or computer-readable medium could even be paper or another suitable medium upon which the program is printed, as the program can be electronically captured, via, for instance, optical scanning of the paper or other medium, then compiled, interpreted, or otherwise processed in a suitable manner, if necessary, and then stored in a computer memory.


Embodiments of the present invention, for example, are described above with reference to block diagrams and/or operational illustrations of methods, systems, and computer program products according to embodiments of the invention. The functions/acts noted in the blocks may occur out of the order as shown in any flowchart. For example, two blocks shown in succession may in fact be executed substantially concurrently or the blocks may sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon the functionality/acts involved.


While certain embodiments of the invention have been described, other embodiments may exist. Furthermore, although embodiments of the present invention have been described as being associated with data stored in memory and other storage mediums, data can also be stored on or read from other types of computer-readable media, such as secondary storage devices, like hard disks, floppy disks, or a CD-ROM, a carrier wave from the Internet, or other forms of RAM or ROM. Further, the disclosed methods' stages may be modified in any manner, including by reordering stages and/or inserting or deleting stages, without departing from the invention.


All rights including copyrights in the code included herein are vested in and the property of the Applicant. The Applicant retains and reserves all rights in the code included herein, and grants permission to reproduce the material only in connection with reproduction of the granted patent and for no other purpose.


While the specification includes examples, the invention's scope is indicated by the following claims. Furthermore, while the specification has been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, the claims are not limited to the features or acts described above. Rather, the specific features and acts described above are disclosed as example for embodiments of the invention.

Claims
  • 1. A method for providing an augmented conversational understanding architecture, the method comprising: receiving, from a user, a natural language phrase comprising an action request, wherein the natural language phrase represents a current dialogue turn of the user;determining a context of the action request using a prior dialogue turn of the user and a data type associated with the action request;determining a context state associated with the user, wherein the context state comprises at least one of a current location of the user and a role associated with the user;determining one or more objectives based on the context of the action request and the context state;deriving a plurality of selectable suggested actions based on the one or more objectives, the plurality of selectable suggested actions comprising a plurality of user activities enabling the fulfillment of the action request; anddisplaying the plurality of selectable suggested actions to the user.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising: translating the natural language phrase into a search phrase; andperforming a search action based on the search phrase, wherein performing the search action comprises mapping the natural language phrase to at least one node of an ontology, the ontology comprising data associated with a plurality of search engine results.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the natural language phrase is received as an audio stream.
  • 4. The method of claim 2, wherein the search phrase comprises at least one semantic concept.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the at least one semantic concept comprises a word not contained in the natural language phrase.
  • 6. The method of claim 2, further comprising: receiving a plurality of search results according to the search action; andproviding the plurality of search results to the user.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the natural language phrase is derived from a conversation among a plurality of users.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, further comprising: analyzing a plurality of application programming interfaces (APIs); andidentifying at least one required parameter for each of the plurality of APIs.
  • 9. The method of claim 8, wherein each of the plurality of APIs is associated with a website search function.
  • 10. The method of claim 8, further comprising: determining whether at least one of the plurality of APIs is associated with the determined context; andin response to determining that at least one of the plurality of APIs is associated with the determined context, translating at least one word of the natural language phrase into the at least one required parameter associated with the at least one of the plurality of APIs.
  • 11. The method of claim 10, further comprising performing a search action by calling the at least one of the plurality of APIs with the at least one required parameter.
  • 12. A computer-readable storage device which stores a set of instructions which when executed performs a method for providing an augmented conversational understanding architecture, the method executed by the set of instructions comprising: receiving, from a user, a natural language phrase comprising an action request, wherein the natural language phrase represents a current dialogue turn of the user;determining a context of the action request using a prior dialogue turn of the user and a data type associated with the action request;identifying a context state associated with the natural language phrase, wherein the context state comprises at least one of a current location of the user, a previously identified user objective, and a role associated with the user;determining one or more objectives based on the context of the action request and the context state;providing a plurality of suggested actions based on the one or more objectives, the plurality of suggested actions being selectable and comprising a plurality of user activities based on the context, the context state, and the action request; andperforming an executable action associated with the action request.
  • 13. The computer-readable storage device of claim 12, wherein the context state further comprises at least one of the following: at least one previous user action request, a time, a date, a category associated with the action request from the user, a data type associated with the first action request from the user, and a data category associated with previous user action requests.
  • 14. The computer-readable storage device of claim 12, wherein the executable action comprises at least one of the following: a search action, a data creation action, a data modification action, and a communication action.
  • 15. The computer-readable storage device of claim 12, wherein the at least one suggested action comprises a suggested activity derived from the context state and the natural language phrase.
  • 16. The computer-readable storage device of claim 15, further comprising: receiving a second natural language phrase from the user;determining whether the second natural language phrase is associated with the at least one suggested action; andin response to determining that the second natural language phrase is associated with the at least one suggested action, performing the at least one suggested next action.
  • 17. The computer-readable storage device of claim 16, further comprising: in response to determining that the second natural language phrase is not associated with the at least one suggested action, providing at least one second suggested action to the user.
  • 18. The computer-readable storage device of claim 17, further comprising: updating the context state according to the second natural language phrase.
  • 19. A system for providing a context-aware environment, the system comprising: a memory storage; anda processing unit coupled to the memory storage, wherein the processing unit is operative to: receive, from a user, an natural language phrase comprising an action request, wherein the natural language phrase represents a current dialogue turn of the user;determining a context of the action request using at least one of: a prior dialogue turn of the user and a data type associated with the action request;identify a context state associated with the user, wherein the context state is based at least in part on the location of the user;identify one or more objectives according to the context of the action request and the context state, the one or more objectives comprising one or more user activities based on one or more terms in the action request;execute the action request according to the context state;compare the context state to a plurality of user context states each associated with a plurality of objectives to determine whether the action request is associated with accomplishing at least one of the plurality of objectives;in response to determining that the action request is associated with accomplishing at least one of the plurality of objectives, update the context state;determine whether the context state comprises a completed objective of the plurality of objectives; andin response to determining that the context state does not comprise the completed objective, provide a selectable suggested action.
  • 20. The method of claim 1, further comprising: receiving a selection of at least one of the plurality of selectable suggested actions; andbased on the selection, adjusting a predicted probability of one or more of the plurality of selectable suggested actions, wherein the predicted probability indicates a confidence the selected action fulfills the action request.
US Referenced Citations (500)
Number Name Date Kind
4560977 Murakami et al. Dec 1985 A
4627620 Yang Dec 1986 A
4630910 Ross et al. Dec 1986 A
4645458 Williams Feb 1987 A
4688195 Thompson Aug 1987 A
4695953 Blair et al. Sep 1987 A
4702475 Elstein et al. Oct 1987 A
4711543 Blair et al. Dec 1987 A
4727354 Lindsay Feb 1988 A
4751642 Silva et al. Jun 1988 A
4772946 Hammer Sep 1988 A
4796997 Svetkoff et al. Jan 1989 A
4809065 Harris et al. Feb 1989 A
4811398 Cooperi et al. Mar 1989 A
4817950 Goo Apr 1989 A
4843568 Krueger et al. Jun 1989 A
4868750 Kucera et al. Sep 1989 A
4893183 Nayar Jan 1990 A
4901362 Terzian Feb 1990 A
4925189 Braeunig May 1990 A
4969192 Chen et al. Nov 1990 A
5101444 Wilson et al. Mar 1992 A
5146406 Jensen Sep 1992 A
5148154 MacKay et al. Sep 1992 A
5184295 Mann Feb 1993 A
5229754 Aoki et al. Jul 1993 A
5229756 Kosugi et al. Jul 1993 A
5239463 Blair et al. Aug 1993 A
5239464 Blair et al. Aug 1993 A
5259766 Sack Nov 1993 A
5265014 Haddock et al. Nov 1993 A
5288078 Capper et al. Feb 1994 A
5295491 Gevins Mar 1994 A
5299125 Baker Mar 1994 A
5320538 Baum Jun 1994 A
5325298 Gallant Jun 1994 A
5347306 Nitta Sep 1994 A
5385519 Hsu et al. Jan 1995 A
5405152 Katanics et al. Apr 1995 A
5417210 Funda et al. May 1995 A
5418948 Turtle May 1995 A
5423554 Davis Jun 1995 A
5454043 Freeman Sep 1995 A
5469740 French et al. Nov 1995 A
5495576 Ritchey Feb 1996 A
5516105 Eisenbrey et al. May 1996 A
5524637 Erickson Jun 1996 A
5534917 MacDougall Jul 1996 A
5563988 Maes et al. Oct 1996 A
5577981 Jarvik Nov 1996 A
5580249 Jacobsen et al. Dec 1996 A
5594469 Freeman et al. Jan 1997 A
5597309 Riess Jan 1997 A
5600765 Ando et al. Feb 1997 A
5616078 Oh Apr 1997 A
5617312 Lura et al. Apr 1997 A
5638300 Johnson Jun 1997 A
5641288 Zaenglein, Jr. Jun 1997 A
5680628 Cams et al. Oct 1997 A
5682196 Freeman Oct 1997 A
5682229 Wangler Oct 1997 A
5690582 Ulrich et al. Nov 1997 A
5694559 Hobson et al. Dec 1997 A
5703367 Hashimoto et al. Dec 1997 A
5704837 Iwasaki et al. Jan 1998 A
5715834 Bergamasco et al. Feb 1998 A
5737734 Schultz Apr 1998 A
5748974 Johnson May 1998 A
5794050 Dahlgren et al. Aug 1998 A
5819260 Lu et al. Oct 1998 A
5861886 Moran et al. Jan 1999 A
5875108 Hoffberg et al. Feb 1999 A
5877803 Wee et al. Mar 1999 A
5880743 Moran et al. Mar 1999 A
5895464 Bhandari et al. Apr 1999 A
5913727 Ahdoot Jun 1999 A
5930746 Ting Jul 1999 A
5933125 Fernie et al. Aug 1999 A
5963940 Liddy et al. Oct 1999 A
5970446 Goldberg et al. Oct 1999 A
5980256 Carmein Nov 1999 A
5989157 Walton Nov 1999 A
5995649 Marugame Nov 1999 A
6005548 Latypov et al. Dec 1999 A
6009210 Kang Dec 1999 A
6054991 Crane et al. Apr 2000 A
6066075 Poulton May 2000 A
6072494 Nguyen Jun 2000 A
6073489 French et al. Jun 2000 A
6077201 Cheng Jun 2000 A
6098458 French et al. Aug 2000 A
6100896 Strohecker et al. Aug 2000 A
6101289 Kellner Aug 2000 A
6111580 Kazama et al. Aug 2000 A
6128003 Smith et al. Oct 2000 A
6130677 Kunz Oct 2000 A
6141463 Covell et al. Oct 2000 A
6147678 Kumar et al. Nov 2000 A
6152856 Studor et al. Nov 2000 A
6159100 Smith Dec 2000 A
6173066 Peurach et al. Jan 2001 B1
6181343 Lyons Jan 2001 B1
6188777 Darrell et al. Feb 2001 B1
6212494 Boguraev Apr 2001 B1
6215890 Matsuo et al. Apr 2001 B1
6215898 Woodtill et al. Apr 2001 B1
6222465 Kumar et al. Apr 2001 B1
6226396 Marugame May 2001 B1
6229913 Nayar et al. May 2001 B1
6246981 Papineni et al. Jun 2001 B1
6256033 Nguyen Jul 2001 B1
6256400 Takata et al. Jul 2001 B1
6283860 Lyons et al. Sep 2001 B1
6289112 Jain et al. Sep 2001 B1
6299308 Voronka et al. Oct 2001 B1
6308565 French et al. Oct 2001 B1
6316934 Amorai-Moriya et al. Nov 2001 B1
6345111 Yamaguchi et al. Feb 2002 B1
6363160 Bradski et al. Mar 2002 B1
6384819 Hunter May 2002 B1
6397179 Crespo et al. May 2002 B2
6401086 Bruckner Jun 2002 B1
6411725 Rhoads Jun 2002 B1
6411744 Edwards Jun 2002 B1
6441725 Rhoads Jun 2002 B1
6430997 French et al. Aug 2002 B1
6434520 Kanevsky et al. Aug 2002 B1
6476834 Doval et al. Nov 2002 B1
6496598 Harman Dec 2002 B1
6503195 Keller et al. Jan 2003 B1
6512838 Rafii et al. Jan 2003 B1
6539931 Trajkovic et al. Apr 2003 B2
6553345 Kuhn et al. Apr 2003 B1
6570555 Prevost et al. May 2003 B1
6601026 Appelt et al. Jul 2003 B2
6633294 Rosenthal et al. Oct 2003 B1
6640202 Dietz et al. Oct 2003 B1
6658377 Anward et al. Dec 2003 B1
6661918 Gordon et al. Dec 2003 B1
6665640 Bennett et al. Dec 2003 B1
6674877 Jojic et al. Jan 2004 B1
6681031 Cohen et al. Jan 2004 B2
6714665 Hanna et al. Mar 2004 B1
6731799 Sun et al. May 2004 B1
6738066 Nguyen May 2004 B1
6757362 Cooper et al. Jun 2004 B1
6765726 French et al. Jul 2004 B2
6788809 Grzeszczuk et al. Sep 2004 B1
6801637 Voronka et al. Oct 2004 B2
6873723 Aucsmith et al. Mar 2005 B1
6876496 French et al. Apr 2005 B2
6895083 Bers et al. May 2005 B1
6937742 Roberts et al. Aug 2005 B2
6950534 Cohen et al. Sep 2005 B2
6970947 Ebling et al. Nov 2005 B2
6990639 Wilson Jan 2006 B2
6999932 Zhou Feb 2006 B1
7003134 Covell et al. Feb 2006 B1
7027974 Busch et al. Apr 2006 B1
7028269 Cohen-Solal et al. Apr 2006 B1
7036094 Cohen et al. Apr 2006 B1
7038855 French et al. May 2006 B2
7039676 Day et al. May 2006 B1
7042440 Pryor et al. May 2006 B2
7050606 Paul et al. May 2006 B2
7050977 Bennett May 2006 B1
7058204 Hildreth et al. Jun 2006 B2
7060957 Lange et al. Jun 2006 B2
7100082 Little Aug 2006 B2
7113918 Ahmad et al. Sep 2006 B1
7121946 Paul et al. Oct 2006 B2
7170492 Bell Jan 2007 B2
7184048 Hunter Feb 2007 B2
7202898 Braun et al. Apr 2007 B1
7222078 Abelow May 2007 B2
7227526 Heldreth et al. Jun 2007 B2
7231609 Baudisch Jun 2007 B2
7251781 Batchilo et al. Jul 2007 B2
7259747 Bell Aug 2007 B2
7272601 Wang et al. Sep 2007 B1
7308112 Fujimura et al. Dec 2007 B2
7317836 Fujimura et al. Jan 2008 B2
7328216 Hofmann et al. Feb 2008 B2
7348963 Bell Mar 2008 B2
7359121 French et al. Apr 2008 B2
7366655 Gupta Apr 2008 B1
7367887 Watabe et al. May 2008 B2
7379563 Shamaie May 2008 B2
7379566 Hildreth May 2008 B2
7389591 Jaiswal et al. Jun 2008 B2
7412077 Li et al. Aug 2008 B2
7421093 Hildreth et al. Sep 2008 B2
7430312 Gu Sep 2008 B2
7436496 Kawahito Oct 2008 B2
7450736 Yang et al. Nov 2008 B2
7452275 Kuraishi Nov 2008 B2
7460690 Cohen et al. Dec 2008 B2
7489812 Fox et al. Feb 2009 B2
7519223 Dehlin et al. Apr 2009 B2
7536032 Bell May 2009 B2
7555142 Hildreth et al. Jun 2009 B2
7560701 Oggier et al. Jul 2009 B2
7570805 Gu Aug 2009 B2
7574020 Shamaie Aug 2009 B2
7576727 Bell Aug 2009 B2
7590262 Fujimura et al. Sep 2009 B2
7593552 Higaki et al. Sep 2009 B2
7596767 Wilson Sep 2009 B2
7598942 Underkoffler et al. Oct 2009 B2
7606700 Ramsey et al. Oct 2009 B2
7607509 Schmiz et al. Oct 2009 B2
7617200 Budzik Nov 2009 B2
7620202 Fujimura et al. Nov 2009 B2
7640164 Sasaki et al. Dec 2009 B2
7647228 Silvera et al. Jan 2010 B2
7665041 Wilson et al. Feb 2010 B2
7668340 Cohen et al. Feb 2010 B2
7672845 Beranek et al. Mar 2010 B2
7680298 Roberts et al. Mar 2010 B2
7683954 Ichikawa et al. Mar 2010 B2
7684592 Paul et al. Mar 2010 B2
7701439 Hillis et al. Apr 2010 B2
7702130 Im et al. Apr 2010 B2
7704135 Harrison, Jr. Apr 2010 B2
7710391 Bell et al. May 2010 B2
7716056 Weng et al. May 2010 B2
7720674 Kaiser et al. May 2010 B2
7720856 Godecke et al. May 2010 B2
7729530 Antonov et al. Jun 2010 B2
7746345 Hunter Jun 2010 B2
7747438 Nguyen et al. Jun 2010 B2
7747601 Cooper et al. Jun 2010 B2
7756708 Cohen et al. Jul 2010 B2
7760182 Ahmad et al. Jul 2010 B2
7797303 Roulland et al. Sep 2010 B2
7809167 Bell Oct 2010 B2
7822597 Brun Oct 2010 B2
7834846 Bell Nov 2010 B1
7852262 Namineni et al. Dec 2010 B2
7869998 Di Fabbrizio Jan 2011 B1
7873532 Jones et al. Jan 2011 B2
7890500 Bobrow et al. Feb 2011 B2
7890539 Boschee et al. Feb 2011 B2
7898522 Hildreth et al. Mar 2011 B2
8000453 Cooper et al. Aug 2011 B2
8019610 Walker Sep 2011 B2
8035612 Bell et al. Oct 2011 B2
8035614 Bell et al. Oct 2011 B2
8035624 Bell et al. Oct 2011 B2
8072470 Marks Dec 2011 B2
8108208 Makela Jan 2012 B2
8117635 Hendricks Feb 2012 B2
8140556 Rao et al. Mar 2012 B2
8144840 Luehrig et al. Mar 2012 B2
8155962 Kennewick et al. Apr 2012 B2
8165886 Gagnon Apr 2012 B1
8180629 Rehberg May 2012 B2
8260817 Boschee et al. Sep 2012 B2
8265925 Aarskog Sep 2012 B2
8265939 Kanevsky et al. Sep 2012 B2
8317518 Jarrell Nov 2012 B2
8335754 Dawson et al. Dec 2012 B2
8352245 Lloyd Jan 2013 B1
8355914 Joh et al. Jan 2013 B2
8380489 Zhang Feb 2013 B1
8433559 Madan Apr 2013 B2
8448083 Migos May 2013 B1
8468019 Rempel Jun 2013 B2
8489115 Rodriquez et al. Jul 2013 B2
8521766 Hoarty Aug 2013 B1
8521786 Black et al. Aug 2013 B2
8595642 Lagassey Nov 2013 B1
8600747 Abella et al. Dec 2013 B2
8612208 Cooper et al. Dec 2013 B2
8612747 Roskind Dec 2013 B2
8762358 Datta et al. Jun 2014 B2
8825661 Joshi et al. Sep 2014 B2
8880406 Santos-Lang et al. Nov 2014 B2
8881122 Klimek et al. Nov 2014 B1
8898163 Banerjee et al. Nov 2014 B2
9064006 Hakkani-Tur Jun 2015 B2
9064066 Hakkani-Tur et al. Jun 2015 B2
9082402 Yadgar Jul 2015 B2
9123341 Weng et al. Sep 2015 B2
9197736 Davis Nov 2015 B2
9286910 Li et al. Mar 2016 B1
9318108 Gruber Apr 2016 B2
9497499 Chang et al. Nov 2016 B2
9812120 Takatsuka Nov 2017 B2
10049667 Heck et al. Aug 2018 B2
10061843 Hakkani-Tur et al. Aug 2018 B2
10296587 Heck et al. May 2019 B2
20010020954 Hull Sep 2001 A1
20010053968 Galitsky Dec 2001 A1
20020059069 Hsu et al. May 2002 A1
20020059289 Wenegrat et al. May 2002 A1
20020165860 Glover Nov 2002 A1
20030125955 Arnold et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030130837 Batchilo et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030137537 Guo et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030236099 Deisher et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040044516 Kennewick et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040078725 Little Apr 2004 A1
20040083092 Valles Apr 2004 A1
20040117189 Bennett Jun 2004 A1
20040122674 Bangalore et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040172460 Marel et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040189720 Wilson et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040193420 Kennewick et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040220797 Wang et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040225499 Wang et al. Nov 2004 A1
20050033582 Gadd Feb 2005 A1
20050074140 Grasso et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050149496 Mukherjee Jul 2005 A1
20050270293 Guo et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050271864 Hudson Dec 2005 A1
20050278164 Hudson et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050289124 Kaiser et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060036430 Hu Feb 2006 A1
20060074631 Wang et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060074883 Teevan et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060080101 Chotimongkol et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060136375 Cox Jun 2006 A1
20060156252 Sheshagiri et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060173868 Angele et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060206306 Cao Sep 2006 A1
20060206333 Paek et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060206336 Gurram et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060206454 Forstall et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060235689 Sugihara Oct 2006 A1
20060271353 Berkan Nov 2006 A1
20060271356 Berkan et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060271520 Ragan Nov 2006 A1
20060293874 Zhang et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070005363 Cucerzan et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070038436 Cristo et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070047719 Dhawan et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070055508 Zhao et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070071209 Horvitz et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070100624 Weng et al. May 2007 A1
20070106497 Ramsey et al. May 2007 A1
20070118357 Kasravi et al. May 2007 A1
20070124134 Van Kommer May 2007 A1
20070124263 Katariya et al. May 2007 A1
20070136068 Horvitz Jun 2007 A1
20070136222 Horvitz Jun 2007 A1
20070143155 Whitsett Jun 2007 A1
20070174343 Fortuna Jul 2007 A1
20070299798 Suyama et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070299799 Meehan et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080005068 Dumais et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080026838 Dunstan et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080040114 Zhou et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080040510 Warner et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080080678 Ma et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080082518 Loftesness Apr 2008 A1
20080097951 Gupta et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080136222 Donaghey Jun 2008 A1
20080140389 Funakoshi Jun 2008 A1
20080140657 Azvine et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080152191 Fujimura et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080167876 Bakis et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080168037 Kapadia Jul 2008 A1
20080172359 Lundell et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080201280 Martin et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080201434 Holmes et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080221870 Attardi et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080228467 Womack et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080231926 Klug et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080235199 Li et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080294628 Shoval et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080300871 Gilbert Dec 2008 A1
20080306934 Craswell Dec 2008 A1
20080319944 Venolia Dec 2008 A1
20080319962 Riezler et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090006333 Jones et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090006345 Platt et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090006389 Piscitello et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090008398 Nakatsuji et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090012778 Feng Jan 2009 A1
20090012842 Srinivasan et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090027337 Hildreth Jan 2009 A1
20090055380 Peng et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090076917 Jablokov et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090077047 Cooper et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090079813 Hildreth Mar 2009 A1
20090089126 Odubiyi Apr 2009 A1
20090089128 Tkatch et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090094036 Ehlen et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090112596 Syrdal et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090112782 Cross et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090119587 Allen et al. May 2009 A1
20090141933 Wagg Jun 2009 A1
20090164441 Cheyer Jun 2009 A1
20090177645 Heck Jul 2009 A1
20090187402 Scholl Jul 2009 A1
20090221368 Yen et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090232288 Forbes et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090234655 Kwon Sep 2009 A1
20090248422 Li et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090248659 McCool et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090281789 Weibel et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090292687 Fan et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090135740 Hildreth et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090315740 Hildreth et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090327889 Jeong Dec 2009 A1
20000023320 Di Cristo et al. Jan 2010
20100005081 Bennett Jan 2010 A1
20100023320 DiCristo Jan 2010 A1
20100023331 Duta et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100036717 Trest Feb 2010 A1
20100036831 Vemuri Feb 2010 A1
20100057463 Weng et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100057801 Ramer et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100070517 Ghosh et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100082610 Anick Apr 2010 A1
20100093435 Glaser et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100095206 Kim Apr 2010 A1
20100112189 Yu May 2010 A1
20100114574 Liu et al. May 2010 A1
20100121839 Meyer May 2010 A1
20100138215 Williams Jun 2010 A1
20100138410 Liu Jun 2010 A1
20100161642 Chen Jun 2010 A1
20100169098 Patch Jul 2010 A1
20100199227 Xiao et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100205180 Cooper et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100217604 Baldwin et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100235341 Bennett Sep 2010 A1
20100235375 Sidhu et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100250518 Bruno Sep 2010 A1
20100274796 Beauregard et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100281435 Bangalore et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100306591 Krishna Dec 2010 A1
20100312779 Lim et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100313125 Fleizach Dec 2010 A1
20100318398 Brun et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100318549 Mayr Dec 2010 A1
20110010367 Jockish et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110016005 Li Jan 2011 A1
20110022992 Zhou et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110040777 Stefanov Feb 2011 A1
20110047149 Vaananen Feb 2011 A1
20110063301 Setlur et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110078159 Li et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110082848 Goldentouch Apr 2011 A1
20110087670 Jorstad et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110099476 Snook et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110105190 Cha May 2011 A1
20110137943 Asano Jun 2011 A1
20110144999 Jang et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110208800 Nicks Aug 2011 A1
20110219340 Pathangay Sep 2011 A1
20110313768 Klein et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110320470 Williams et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110320945 Wong Dec 2011 A1
20120016678 Gruber et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120030637 Day et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120035924 Jitkoff et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120059842 Hille-Doering Mar 2012 A1
20120078636 Ferrucci Mar 2012 A1
20120082353 Kelusky et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120130822 Patwa et al. May 2012 A1
20120131073 Olney May 2012 A1
20120136865 Blom et al. May 2012 A1
20120166178 Latzina Jun 2012 A1
20120197999 Agarwal et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120216151 Sarkar et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120233207 Mohajer Sep 2012 A1
20120242586 Krishnaswamy Sep 2012 A1
20120253788 Heck et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120253789 Heck et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120253790 Heck et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120253791 Heck et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120253793 Ghannam et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120253802 Heck et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120254810 Heck et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120290290 Tur et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120296643 Kristjansson et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120316862 Sultan et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120327009 Fleizach Dec 2012 A1
20130013644 Sathish et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130080472 Cohen et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130117022 Chen et al. May 2013 A1
20130185081 Cheyer et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130241834 Vennelakanti et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130273976 Rao et al. Oct 2013 A1
20140006012 Zhou et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140059030 Hakkani-Tur et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140074629 Rathod Mar 2014 A1
20150127323 Jacquet May 2015 A1
20150356418 Yampolska et al. Dec 2015 A1
20160004707 Hakkani-Tur et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160118046 Heck et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160140228 Cohen et al. May 2016 A1
20160179807 Kumar et al. Jun 2016 A1
20170011025 Tur et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170038097 Ni et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170075985 Chakraborty et al. Mar 2017 A1
20180075151 Heck Mar 2018 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (59)
Number Date Country
1313972 Sep 2001 CN
1325527 Dec 2001 CN
1692407 Nov 2005 CN
1963752 Oct 2006 CN
1845052 May 2007 CN
1983271 Jun 2007 CN
101120341 Feb 2008 CN
101297355 Oct 2008 CN
101339551 Jan 2009 CN
101254344 Jun 2010 CN
101499277 May 2011 CN
357909 Mar 1990 EP
583061 Feb 1994 EP
919906 Jun 1999 EP
1793318 Jun 2007 EP
1 335 338 Dec 2007 EP
2122542 Nov 2009 EP
H0844490 Feb 1996 JP
08-235185 Sep 1996 JP
2001022779 Jan 2001 JP
2001125592 May 2001 JP
2001125896 May 2001 JP
2002-024285 Jan 2002 JP
2002-082748 Mar 2002 JP
2003-505712 Feb 2003 JP
2003-115951 Apr 2003 JP
2004212641 Jul 2004 JP
2004328181 Nov 2004 JP
2004341672 Dec 2004 JP
2005-043461 Feb 2005 JP
2006202159 Aug 2006 JP
2009116733 May 2009 JP
2009205552 Sep 2009 JP
2010-128665 Jun 2010 JP
2010519609 Jun 2010 JP
2010-145262 Jul 2010 JP
2010-230918 Oct 2010 JP
2010538375 Dec 2010 JP
1020050032649 Apr 2005 KR
10-1007336 Jan 2011 KR
10-2011-0066357 Jun 2011 KR
504624 Oct 2002 TW
9310708 Jun 1993 WO
9519931 Jul 1995 WO
9717598 May 1997 WO
9803907 Jan 1998 WO
9942920 Aug 1999 WO
9944698 Sep 1999 WO
0073995 Dec 2000 WO
WO 0073900 Dec 2000 WO
WO 0075808 Dec 2000 WO
2006042028 Jun 2006 WO
WO 2007064482 Jun 2007 WO
2008049206 May 2008 WO
WO 2008069519 Jun 2008 WO
2008100690 Aug 2008 WO
2009029905 May 2009 WO
WO 2009059065 May 2009 WO
2012135210 Oct 2012 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (264)
Entry
Senior, et al., article entitled “Augmenting Conversational Dialogue by Means of Latent Semantic Googling,”—Published Date: Oct. 4-6, 2005, Trento, Italy; 7 pages, http://www.hml.queensu.ca/files/po265-senior.pdf.
Wang, et al., article entitled “Idea Expander: Agent-Augmented Online Brainstorming,”—Published Date: Feb. 6-10, 2010, Savannah, Georgia; 2 pages, http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/redmond/groups/connect/cscw_10/docs/p535.pdf.
Lyons, et al., article entitled “Augmenting Conversations Using Dual-Purpose Speech,”—Published Date: 2004; College of Computing and GVU Center, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia; 10 pages. http://www.cc.gatech.edu/ccg/publications/dp-uist.pdf.
Sherwani, et al., article entitled “VoicePedia: Towards Speech-based Access to Unstructured Information,”—Published Date: 2007; 4 pages http://www.cs.cmu.edu/˜jsherwan/pubs/voicepedia.pdf.
Website: The Future of Voice Arrives—Published Date: Jan. 11, 2007; 2 pages http://www.voicebox.com/technology/.
Mairesse, et al., article entitled Learning to Personalize Spoken Generation for Dialogue Systems—Published Date: 2005; 4 pages. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.66.9988&rep=repl&type=pdf.
Nguyen, et al., article entitled “An Adaptive Plan Based Dialogue Agent: Integrating Learning into a BDI Architecture,” Published Date: May 8-12 2006 at AAMASA '06 in Hakodate, Hokkaido, Japan; 3 pages. http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/˜wobcke/papers/adaptive-dialogue.pdf.
Website: Fully automated conversation dialog systems, Published Date: Jun. 10, 2008; 2 pages. http://www.gyruslogic.com/.
Technical Whitepaper entitled “Speak With Me, Inc.” Retrieved Date: Sep. 24, 2010; 11 pages. http://www.speakwithme.com/files/pdf/whitepaper.pdf.
Castells, et al., article entitled “Scalable semantic personalized search of spoken and written contents on the Semantic Web,A” Published Date: 2005; 12 pages. http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http://ir.ii.uam.es/s5t/informes/TIN2005-06885.pdf.
Marcialis, et al., article entitled “SEARCHY: An Agent to Personalize Search Results,” Published Date: Jun. 20, 2008 at the IEEE Third International Conference on Internet and Web Applications and Services Conference; 6 pages. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=4545664.
Tomuro et al., article entitled “Personalized Search in Folksonomies with Ontological User Profiles,” Retrieved Date: Sep. 30, 2010; 14 pages. http://facweb.cs.depaul.edu/noriko/papers/iis09.pdf.
Mylonas et al., article entitled “Personalized information retrieval based on context and ontological knowledge,” Retrieved Date: Sep. 30, 2010. Printed in the United Kingdom and Presented in the Knowledge Engineering Review, vol. 23:1, 73-100; 2007, Cambridge University Press, 28 pages. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.148.4272&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
Abstract entitled “Adding Intelligence to the Interface,” Published Date: 1996 IEEE; 12 pages. http://www.hitl.washington.edu/publications/billinghurst/vrais96/.
Turunen et al. article entitled “Multimodal Interaction with Speech and Physical Touch Interface in a Media Center Application,” Presented and Published Oct. 29-31, 2009 at Ace 2009 in Athens, Greece; 8 pages. http://delivery.acm.org/10.1145/1700000/1690392/p19-turunen.pdf!kev1=1690392&key2=5824375821&coll=GUIDE&dl=GUIDE&CFID=103676711&CFTOKEN=24231502.
Moustakas et al., article entitled “MASTER-PIECE: A Multimodal (Gesture+Speech) Interface for 3D Model Search and Retrieval Integrated in a Virtual Assembly Application,” Presented and Published Jul. 18-Aug. 12, 2005 at Enterface '05 in Mons, Belgium; 14 pages. http://www.enterface.net/enterface05/docs/results/reports/project7.pdf.
Lee e al., article entitled “An Implementation of Multi-Modal Game Interface Based on PDAs,” Published Date: Aug. 2007 at the IEEE Fifth International Conference on Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications; 8 pages. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=4297013.
Mark Billinghurst, article entitled “Put That Where? Voice and Gesture at the Graphics Interface,” Published in the Nov. 1998 Computer Graphics, 5 pages. http://delivery.acm.org/10.1145/310000/307730/p60-billinghurst.pdf?key1=307730&key2=0278375821&coll=GUIDE&dl=GUIDE&CFID=103683245&CFTOKEN=90378528.
Stegmann, et al., abstract entitled “Multimodal Interaction for Access to Media Content,” Retrieved Date: Sep. 29, 2010; 4 pages. http://www.icin.biz/files/2008papers/Poster-08.pdf.
Horiguchi et al., abstract entitled “GaChat: A chat system that displays online retrieval information in dialogue text,” Published at the Workshop on Visual Interfaces to the Social and the Semantic Web Conference Feb. 8, 2009 in Sanibel Island, Florida; 5 pages. http://www.smart-ui.org/events/vissw2009/papers/VISSW2009-Horiguchi.pdf.
Aye, et al., article entitled “Use of Ontologies for Bridging Semantic Gaps in Distant Communication,” Published Date: 2008; 5 pages. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=4781725.
Jebara et al., article entitled “Tracking Conversational Context for Machine Mediation of Human Discourse,” Retrieved Date: Oct. 1, 2010; 3 pages. http://www.cs.columbia.edu/˜jebara/papers/conversation.pdf.
Power Point Presentation entitled “Spoken Language Understanding for Conversational Dialog Systems,” Presented and published at the IEEE/ACL 2006 Workshop on Spoken Language Technology in Aruba, Dec. 10-13, 2006; 33 pages. http://www.slt2006.org/MichaelMcTear.ppt.
Fabbrizio et al., abstract entitled “Bootstrapping Spoken Dialog Systems with Data Reuse,” Retrieved Date: Oct. 12, 2010; 9 pages. http://www.sigdial.org/workshops/workshop5/proceedings/pdf/difabbrizio.pdf.
Website: Siri: Your Personal Assistant for the Mobile Web—Published Date: Feb. 4, 2010; 3 pages. http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/siri_your_personal_assistant_for_the_mobile_web.php.
Abela, et al., abstract entitled “SemChat: Extracting Personal Information from Chat Conversations,” Retrieved Date: Oct. 12, 2010; 10 pages. http://staff.um.edu.mt/cabe2/supervising/undergraduate/overview/keith_cortis.pdf.
Robert Brown, article entitled “Exploring New Speech Recognition and Synthesis APIs in Windows Vista,” published in MSDN Magazine, Retrieved Date: Oct. 12, 2010; 11 pages. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/cc163663.aspx.
U.S. Patent Application entitled “Augmented Conversational Understanding Agent” in U.S. Appl. No. 13/076,862, filed Mar. 31, 2011.
U.S. Patent Application entitled “Conversational Dialog Learning and Correction” having U.S. Appl. No. 13/077,233, filed Mar. 31, 2011.
U.S. Patent Application entitled “Personalization of Queries, Conversations, and Searches” having U.S. Appl. No. 13/077,303, filed Mar. 31, 2011.
U.S. Patent Application entitled “Combined Activation for Natural User Interface Systems” having U.S. Appl. No. 13/077,368, filed Mar. 31, 2011.
U.S. Patent Application entitled “Task Driven User Intents” having U.S. Appl. No. 13/077,396, filed March 31, 2011.
U.S. Patent Application entitled “Location-Based Conversational Understanding” having U.S. Appl. No. 13/077,455, filed Mar. 31, 2011.
Lee, et al. Abstract entitled “Simplification of Nomenclature Leads to an Ideal IL for Human Language Communication”—Published Date: Oct. 28, 1997, at the AMTA/SIG-IL First Workshop on Interlinguas, San Diego, CA., Oct. 28, 1997; pp. 71-72; 2 pgs. Obtained at: http://www.mt-archive.info/AMTA-1997-Lee.pdf.
Kuansan Wang, Abstract entitled “Semantics Synchronous Understanding for Robust Spoken Language Applications”—Published Date: 2003, pp. 640-645; 6 pgs. Obtained at: http://research.microsoft.com/pubs/77494/2003-kuansan-asru.pdf.
Antoine, et al., Abstract entitled “Automatic Adaptive Understanding of Spoken Language by Cooperation of Syntactic Parsing and Semantic Priming”—Published Date: 1994; 5 pgs. Obtained at: http://www-clips.imag.fr/geod/User/jean.caelen/Publis_fichiers/SyntaxeSemantique.pdf.
Tur, et al., Abstract entitled “Semi-Supervised Learning for Spoken Language Understanding Using Semantic Role Labeling”—Published Date: 2005, pp. 232-237; 6 pgs. Obtained at: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=01566523.
Finkel, et al., Abstract entitled “Incorporating Non-Local Information into Information Extraction Systems by Gibbs Sampling”—Published Date: Jan. 3, 2006, 8 pgs. Obtained at: http://n1p.stanford.edu/˜manning/papers/gibbscrf3.pdf.
Wang, et al, Article entitled “An Introduction to the Statistical Spoken Language Understanding”—Published in the IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 22, No. 5, pp. 16-31; 2005. http://research.microsoft.com/pubs/75236/2005-Wang-Deng-Acero-SPM.pdf.
Gorin, et al., Abstract entitled “How May I Help You?” Published in Speech Communication 23, Feb. 14, 1997, Revised May 23, 1997; pp. 113-127, 14 pgs. http://disi.unitn.itt˜riccardi/papers/specom97.pdf.
P. J. Price, Abstract entitled “Evaluation of Spoken Language Systems: The ATIS Domain” Obtained on May 12, 2011, 5 pgs. from the following website: http://acl.ldc.upenn.edu/H/H90/H90-1020.pdf.
Raymond, et al, Abstract entitled “Generative and Discriminative Algorithms for Spoken Language Understanding”, Published Aug. 27-31, 2007 at the Interspeech 2007 Conference in Antwerp, Belgium; pp. 1605-1608, 4 pgs. Obtain at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.106.2105&rep=repl&type=pdf.
Jeong, et al., Abstract entitled “Exploiting Non-Local Features for Spoken Language Understanding” Published in the Proceedings of the COLING/ACL 2006 Main Conference Poster Sessions, pp. 412-419 in Sydney, Australia Jul. 2006; 8 pgs. Obtained copy at: http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P/P06/P06-2054.pdf.
Moschitti, et al., Abstract entitled “Spoken Language Understanding with Kernels for Syntactic/ Semantic Structures” Published in the 2007 IEEE Proceedings, pp. 183-188; 6 pgs. Obtained at: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=4430106.
Hakkani-Tur, et al. Abstract entitled “Using Semantic and Syntactic Graphs for Call Classification” Published in the Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Feature Engineering for Machine Learingin in NLP, pp. 24-31 in Ann Arbor, Michigan, Jun. 2005; 8 pgs. Obtained at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.59.8566&rep=repl&type=pdf.
Dowding, et al. Article entitled “Gemini: A Natural Language System for Spoken Language Understanding” pp. 54-61; 8 pgs. Obtained on May 12, 2011 at website: http://acl.ldc.upenn.edu/P/P93/P93-1008.pdf.
Stephanie Seneff. Article entitled “TINA: A Natural Language System for Spoken Language Applications” Published in the 1992 Edition of Association for Computational Linguistics, vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 61-86; 26 pgs. Obtained at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.75.1626&rep=repl&type=pdf.
Ward, et al. Abstract entitled “Recent Improvements in the CMU Spoken Language Understanding System.” 4 pgs. Obtained on May 12, 2011 at website: http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/H/H94/H94-1039.pdf.
Vickrey, et al. Abstract entitled “Sentence Simplification for Semantic Role Labeling.” 9 pgs. Obtained on May 12, 2011 at website: http://ai.stanford.edu/˜dvickrey/underlying.pdf.
Vanderwende, et al. Abstract entitled “Microsoft Research at DUC2006: Task-Focused Summarization with Sentence Simplification and Lexical Expansion.” 8 pgs. Obtained on May 12, 2011 at website: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.114.2486&rep=repl&type=pdf.
Petrov et al., Abstract entitled “Learning and Inference for Hierarchically Split PCFGs” Published in 2007 in cooperation with the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence. 4 pgs. Obtained at: http://www.petrovi.de/data/aaai07.pdf.
Schapire, et al. Abstract entitled “BoosTexter: A Boosting-Based System for Text Categorization,” 34 pgs. Obtaining May 12, 2011 at website: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.33.1666&rep=repl&type=pdf.
He, et al. Abstract entitled “A Data-Driven Spoken Language Understanding System.” 6 pgs. Obtained on May 12, 2011 at website: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.141.5688&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
Yaman, et al., Article entitled “An Integrative and Discriminative Technique for Spoken Utterance Classification,” Published in the IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing Magazine, vol. 16, No. 6, Aug. 2008. pp. 1207-1214; 8 pgs. http://research.microsoft.com/pubs/73918/sibel.pdf.
Gillick, et al. Article entitled “Some Statistical Issues in the Comparison of Speech Recognition Algorithms.” Published in the Proceedings at the IEEE Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Sig. Proc., Glasglow, 1989; pp. 532-535; 4pgs. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.162.2233&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
Tur, et al., Abstract entitled “What is Left to be Understood in ATIS?” Published in the Proceedings of the IEEE SLT Workshop in Berkeley, CA., 2010. (not readily available on any website); 6 pgs.
Brody, et al., Body language user interface (BLUI), http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998SPIE.3299..400B, accessed Aug. 17, 2009, 1 page.
Corominas, Aurora, “The Artist's Gesture. An initial approach to the cinematic representation of Vincent Van Gogh's pictorial practice”, http://www.iva.upf.es/formats/formats3/cor_a.htm, accessed Aug. 17, 2009, 12 pages.
Gao et al., “VS: Facial Sculpting in the Virgual World”, International Conference on Computational Intelligence for Modeling Control and Automation, and International Conference on Intelligent Agents, Web Technologies and Internet Commerce (CIMCA-IAWTIC'06), IEEE Computer Society, Aug. 17, 2009, 6 pages.
Hauptmann, “Speech and Gestures for Graphic Image Manipulation”, CHI'89 Proceedings, Department of Computer Science, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Penn., May 1989, 20(SI), 241-245.
Qian et al., “A Gesture-Driven Multimodal Interactive Dance System”, IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo,Taipei, Jun. 2004, vol. 3, pp. 1579-1582.
Shivappa et al., “Person Tracking with Audio-Visual Cues Using Iterative Decoding Framework”, IEEE Fifth International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance, AVSS '08, Santa Fe, MN, Sep. 1-3, 2008, pp. 260-267.
U.S. Patent Application entitled “Sentence Simplification for Spoken Language Understanding” having U.S. Appl. No. 13/106,374, filed May 12, 2011.
U.S. Official Action dated May 10, 2012, in U.S. Appl. No. 12/604,526. 21 pgs.
International Search Report & Written Opinion in PCT/US2012/031722 dated Oct. 23, 2012.
International Search Report & Written Opinion in PCT/US2012/031736 dated Oct. 31, 2012.
International Search Report & Written Opinion in PCT/US2012/030730 dated Oct. 30, 2012.
International Search Report & Written Opinion in PCT/US2012/030636 dated Oct. 31, 2012.
International Search Report & Written Opinion in PCT/US2012/030740 dated Nov. 1, 2012.
International Search Report & Written Opinion in PCT/US2012/030757 dated Nov. 1, 2012.
International Search Report & Written Opinion in PCT/US2012/030751 dated Sep. 5, 2012.
Tur, et al., “Sentence Simplification for Spoken Language Understanding”, In Proceedings of International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, May 22, 2011, 4 pages.
Hakkani-Tur, et al., “Mining Search Query Logs for Spoken Language Understanding”, In Workshop on Future Directions and Needs in the Spoken Dialog Community: Tools and Data, Jun. 7, 2012, pp. 37-40.
Riezler, et al., “Query Rewriting Using Monolingual Statistical Machine Translation”, In Journal of Computational Linguistics Archive, vol. 36, Issue 3, Sep. 2010, pp. 569-582.
Agichtein, et al., “Improving Web Search Ranking by Incorporating User Behavior Information”, In Proceedings of the 29th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Aug. 6, 2006, 8 pgs.
Hakkani-Tur, et al., “Exploiting Query Click Logs for Utterance Domain Detection in Spoken Language Understanding”, In Proceedings of International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, May 22, 2011, 4 pages.
Hakkani-Tur, et al., “Employing Web Search Query Click Logs for Multi-Domain Spoken Language Understanding”, In Proceedings of IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding, Dec. 11, 2011, 6 pgs.
Jung, J. Jason, “Ontology-based context Synchronization for an ad hoc social collaborations,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 21, 2008, pp. 573-580.
Kok, et al., “Hitting the Right Paraphrases in Good Time”, In Proceedings of Human Language Technologies: The Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Jun. 2010, 9 pgs.
Koehn, et al., “Moses: Open Source Toolkit for Statistical Machine Translation”, In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Demonstration and Poster Session, Jun. 2007, 4 pages.
Och, et al., “A Systematic Comparison of Various Statistical Alignment Models”, In Journal of Computational Linguistics, vol. 29, Issue 1, Mar. 2003, 33 pages.
Tur, et al., “Model Adaptation for Dialog Act Tagging”, In Proceedings of IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop, Dec. 10, 2006, 4 pages.
Haffner, et al., “Optimizing SVMS for Complex Call Classification”, In Proceedings of IEEE International Processing, Apr. 6, 2003, 4 pages.
Mittal, et al., “A Hybrid Approach of Personalized Web Information Retrieval.” Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, Aug. 31, 2010, vol. 1, pp. 308-313.
D. Hakkani-T{umlaut over ( )}ur, G. Tur, L. Heck, and E. Shriberg, “Bootstrapping Domain Detection Using Query Click Logs for New Domains,” In Proceedings of Interspeech, Florence, Italy, 2011.
D. Hillard, A. Celikyilmaz, D. Hakkani-T{umlaut over ( )}ur, and G. Tur, “Learning Weighted Entity Lists from Web Click Logs for Spoken Language Understanding,” In Proceedings of Interspeech, Florence, Italy, 2011.
A. Celikyilmaz, D. Hakkani-T{umlaut over ( )}ur, and G. Tur, “Approximate Interference for Domain Detection in Spoken Language Understanding,” in Proceedings of Interspeech, Florence, Italy, 2011.
U.S. Patent Application entitled “Translating Natural Language Utterances to Keyword Search Queries” having U.S. Appl. No. 13/592,638, filed Aug. 23, 2012.
U.S. Official Action dated May 29, 2013, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/077,303.
U.S. Official Action dated Jun. 4, 2013, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/077,368.
U.S. Restriction Requirement dated Nov. 2, 2012, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/077,368.
U.S. Official Action dated Mar. 20, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/076,862, 35 pgs.
U.S. Official Action dated Mar. 20, 2014, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/077,368, 22 pgs.
U.S. Official Action dated May 15, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/106,374, 56 pgs.
U.S. Official Action dated Jan. 28, 2014, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/077,455, 27 pgs.
U.S. Official Action dated Feb. 24, 2014, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/077,396, 50 pgs.
U.S. Official Action dated Feb. 28, 2014, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/077,233, 53 pgs.
“International Search Report & Written Opinion for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/055232”, dated Nov. 18, 2013, Filed Date: Aug. 16, 2013, 10 Pages.
G. Tur and R. D. Mori, Eds., Spoken Language Understanding: Systems for Extracting Semantic Information from Speech. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, 2011, 484 pgs.
U.S. Official Action dated Jun. 11, 2013, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/077,455
U.S. Official Action dated Aug. 1, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/076,862
U.S. Official Action dated Dec. 24, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/592,638
U.S. Official Action dated Jan. 7, 2014, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/077,303
U.S. Official Action dated Jun. 26, 2014, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/077,455, 26 pgs.
U.S. Official Action dated Jul. 10, 2014, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/077,303, 31 pgs.
U.S. Official Action dated Sep. 15, 2014, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/077,368, 12 pgs.
U.S. Official Action dated Oct. 2, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/106,374, 42 pgs.
U.S. Official Action dated Oct. 10, 2014, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/077,233, 51 pgs.
Richard A. Bolt, “Put-That-There”: Voice and Gesture at the Graphics Interface, Architecture Machine Group, MIT, 1980, 9 pgs.
U.S. Official Action dated Oct. 29, 2014, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/077,455, 27 pgs.
U.S. Official Action dated Nov. 3, 2014, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/077,303, 28 pgs.
U.S. Official Action dated Nov. 19, 2014, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/077,396, 55 pgs.
U.S. Patent Application entitled “Translating Natural Language Utterances to Keyword Search Queries” having U.S. Appl. No. 14/733,188, filed Jun. 8, 2015.
EP Extended Search Report Received for European Patent Application No. 12763913.6, dated Sep. 2015, 13 pgs.
Taiwan Search Report Issued in Patent Application No. 101105673, dated Oct. 16, 2015, 9 Pages.
Klusch; “Information Agent Technology for the Internet: A Survey”; Data & Knowledge Engineering; vol. 36, Mar. 1, 2001, 36 pgs.
Panton et al., “Common Sense Reasoning—From Cyc to Intelligent Assistant”; Cycorp, Inc.; Jan. 1, 2006; Ambient Intelligence in Everyday Life Lecture Notes in Computer Science; 32 pgs.
Kolski et al., “A Review of Intelligent Human-Machine Interfaces in the Light of the Arch Model”; Published online Nov. 13, 2009; International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction; vol. 10, No. 3; Sep. 1, 1998.
Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 18, 2015, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/077,455, 22 pgs.
Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 7, 2015, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/077,368, 24 pgs.
U.S. Patent Application entitled “Location-Based Conversational Understanding” having U.S. Appl. No. 14/989,974, filed Jan. 7, 2016.
U.S. Official Action dated Dec. 4, 2015, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/077,396, 45 pgs.
U.S. Official Action dated Dec. 4, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/106,374, 64 pgs.
U.S. Official Action dated Dec. 7, 2015, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/077,303, 32 pgs.
U.S. Official Action dated Jan. 14, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/076,862, 44 pgs.
Chinese Office Action and Search Report Issued in Patent Application No. 201210092263.0, dated Dec. 10, 2015, 15 pgs.
Chinese Office Action and Search Report Issued in Patent Application No. 201210101485.4, dated Dec. 11, 2015, 14 Pages.
Taiwan Notice of Allowance Issued in Patent Application No. 101105673, dated Mar. 2, 2016, 4 Pages.
Japanese Office Action in Application 2014-502721, dated Mar. 3, 2016, 10 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/077,233, Office Action dated Apr. 18, 2016, 36 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/077,303, Advisory Action dated Apr. 15, 2016, 3 pgs.
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 18, 2015, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/077,455, 2 pgs.
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 3, 2015, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/077,455, 2 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/106,374, Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 4, 2016, 2 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/077,303, Office Action dated Oct. 26, 2016, 16 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/733,188, Office Action dated Oct. 25, 2016, 16 pages.
Chinese 2nd Office Action in Application 201210092263.0, dated Aug. 16, 2016, 5 pgs.
Chinese 2nd Office Action in Application 201210101485.4, dated Aug. 16, 2016, 5 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/106,374, Notice of Allowance dated May 27, 2016, 2 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/077,303, Office Action dated May 3, 2016, 19 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/077,396, Office Action dated May 19, 2016, 36 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/106,374, Notice of Allowance dated May 13, 2016, 16 pgs.
PCT International Search Report in PCT/US2013/049085, dated Nov. 7, 2013, 8 pages
PCT International Search Report in PCT/US2016/050840, dated Dec. 6, 2016, 12 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/077,303, Advisory Action dated Feb. 2, 2017, 3 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/539,674, Office Action dated Oct. 27, 2015, 15 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/539,674, Office Action dated Mar. 17, 2015, 12 pages.
Molla et al., “AnswerFinder at Trec 2004,” In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Text Retrieval Conference, TREC, Nov. 16, 2004, 9 pages.
Wang et al., “Web-Based Unsupervised Learning for Query Formation in Question Answering”, Proc 2nd Intl Joint Conf on Natural Language Processing, Oct. 2005, 12 pages.
Cao et al., “Integrating Word Relationships into Language Models,” In Proceedings of 28th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and evelopment in Information Retrieval, Aug. 15, 2005, 8 pages.
Chu-Carroll et al., “A Hybrid Approach to Natural Language Web Search,” Proc of Conf on Empirical Methods in latural Language Processing, Jul. 2002, Association for Computational Linguistics, 8 pages.
Di Buccio Emanuele et al., “Detecting verbose queries and improving information retrieval,” Information Processing & Management, vol. 50, No. 2, Oct. 28, 2013, 19 pages.
Goodwin, “Which Search Engine Would be a Jeopardy Champion?” retrieved Apr. 12, 2012 from http://searchenginewatch.com/article/2050114/which-search-engine-would-be-a-jeopardy-champion, Jan. 2011, 2 pages.
Gupta et al., “Information Retrieval with Verbose Queries”, Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, vol. 9, No. 3-4, Jul. 31, 2015, pp. 209-354.
Huston et al., “Evaluating verbose query processing techniques”, Proceedings of the 33rd International ACM Sigir Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Sigir '10, ACM Press, New York, New York, Jul. 19, 2010, pp. 291-298.
Chinese Office Action in Application 201210101485.4, dated Feb. 20, 2017, 5 pages.
Chinese Notice of Allowance in Application 201210093414.4, dated Feb. 9, 2017, 8 pages.
Japanese Notice of Allowance in Application 2014-502718, dated Feb. 1, 2017, 3 pages. (No English Translation.).
Chinese Notice of Allowance in Application 201210092263.0, dated Feb. 28, 2017, 4 pgs.
Chinese 2nd Office Action in Application 201210090349.X, dated Feb. 28, 2017, 9 pgs.
Chinese 2nd Office Action in Application 201210090634.1, dated Mar. 21, 2017, 9 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/076,862, Notice of Allowance dated May 3, 2017, 14 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/077,303, Ex-Parte Quayle Action mailed May 4, 2017, 6 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/989,974, Office Action dated Mar. 29, 2017, 16 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/077,233, Office Action dated Nov. 10, 2016, 41 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/076,862, Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 1, 2016, 16 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/077,396, Office Action dated Jan. 27, 2017, 36 pages.
Chinese Office Action in Application 201210091176.3, dated Dec. 21, 2016, 9 pages.
Japanese Office Action in Application 20014502721, dated Nov. 22, 2016, 4 pages.
Japanese Notice of Allowance in Application 2014-502723, dated Jan. 4, 2017, 3 pages. (No English Translation.).
Chinese Office Action in Application 201210087420.9, dated Jan. 12, 2017, 5 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/077,396, Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 28, 2017, 25 pages.
Chinese Notice of Allowance in Application 201210087420.9, dated May 4, 2017, 3 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/077,233, Appeal Brief filed Jun. 12, 2017, 32 pages.
Chinese Office Action in Application 201210087420.9, dated May 15, 2016, 18 pgs.
Chinese Office Action in Application 201210090634.1, dated Jun. 30, 2016, 10 pgs.
Chinese Office Action in Application 201210090349, dated Jun. 15, 2016, 13 pages.
Chinese Office Action in Application 2012100911763, dated May 25, 2016, 14 pages.
Chinese Office Action in Application 201210093414.4, dated Mar. 6, 2016, 16 pages.
Japanese Office Action in Application 2014-502723, dated Apr. 27, 2016, 7 pages.
Japanese Office Action in Application 2014-502718, dated May 26, 2016, 9 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/077,303, Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 18, 2017, 2 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/818,432, Office Action dated Dec. 29, 2017, 15 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/989,974, Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 19, 2017, 8 pgs.
Chinese Notice of Allowance in Application 201210101485.4, dated Jun. 29, 2017, 4 pages.
PCT 2nd Written Opinion in International Application PCT/US2016/050840, dated Jul. 24, 2017, 7 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/077,233, Examiner's Answer to the Appeal Brief dated Aug. 4, 2017, 13 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/077,303, Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 24, 2017, 7 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/989,974, Office Action dated Aug. 14, 2017, 20 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/077,396, Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 30, 2017, 20 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/733,188, Office Action dated Sep. 18, 2017, 15 pgs.
Chinese Decision on Rejection in Application 201210091176.3, dated Aug. 2, 2017, 11 pages.
Chinese Notice of Allowance in Application 201210090349.X, dated Aug. 31, 2017, 4pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/077,396, USPTO Response to 312 Amendment dated Nov. 9, 2017, 2 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/856,139, Office Action dated Nov. 9, 2017, 18 pgs.
Chinese 3rd Office Action in Application 201210090834.1, dated Oct. 31, 2017, 11 pages.
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability in International Application PCT/US2016/050840, dated Dec. 12, 2017, 9 pgs.
EP Communication dated Apr. 20, 2015 in Application No. PCT/US2012/030636, 8 pgs.
EP Supplementary Search Report Received for European Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/031736, dated May 11, 2015, 10 Pages.
EP Search Report Issued in European Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/030730, dated May 11, 2015, 9 Pages.
EP Supplementary Search Report Issued in European Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/031722, dated May 11, 2015, 11 Pages.
EP Search Report Received for European Patent Application No. 12765896.1, dated May 28, 2015, 12 Pages.
Diaz et al., “CO-Pretege: A Groupware Tool for Supporting Collaborative Ontology Design with Divergence”; alicia.diaz@sol.info.unlp.edu.ar; Jul. 18, 2005; [retrieved Mar. 26, 2015]; 4 pgs. (cited in Apr. 20, 2015 EP Comm).
Hu, et al., “SmartContext: An Ontology Based Context Model for Cooperative Mobile Learning”, In Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design III, May 3, 2006, pp. 717-726 (cited in May 11, 2015 EP Supp ISR).
Siebra, et al., “SmartChat—An Intelligent Environment for Collaborative Discussions”, In Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Aug. 30, 2004, pp. 883-885 (EP Supp ISR).
Cozzolongo, et al., “Personalized Control of Smart Environments”, in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4511, Jul. 25, 2007, 5 Pages (cited in May 28, 2015 EP ISR).
Nijholt, et al., “Google Home: Experience, Support and Re-Experience of Social Home Activities”, In Information Sciences, vol. 178, Issue 3, Nov. 6, 2007, 19 Pages (cited in May 28, 2015 EP ISR).
Pissinou, et al., “A Roadmap to the Utilization of Intelligent Information Agents: Are Intelligent Agents the Link Between the Database and Artificial Intelligence Communities?”, In IEEE Knowledge and Data Engineering Exchange Workshop, Jan. 1, 1997, 10 Pages (cited in May 28, 2015 EP ISR).
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 3, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/592,638, 23 pgs.
U.S. Official Action dated May 5, 2015, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/077,455, 14 pgs.
U.S. Official Action dated May 28, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/106,374, 44 pgs.
U.S. Official Action dated Jun. 4, 2015, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/077,396, 35 pgs.
U.S. Official Action dated Jun. 12, 2015, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/077,303, 25 pgs.
U.S. Official Action dated Jul. 1, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/076,862, 60 pgs.
Chinese Office Action in Application 201210091176.3, dated Feb. 2, 2018, 5 pages.
Japanese Notice of Allowance in Application 2017-038097, dated Feb. 5, 2018, 3 pages.
Yasufumi Kaneko et al., Detecting Search Intention by Analyzing Relationship between Keywords with Relaxation Value and an Interface for Inputting Keywords, Jun. 27, 2008, Journal of DBSJ, the 7th volume, No. 1, p. 181-186 (No English Translation).
Korean Office Action in Application 10-2013-7025540, dated Jan. 31, 2018, 13 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/989,974, Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 5, 2018, 5 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/271,859, Office Action dated Jan. 8, 2018, 44 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/989,974, Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 13, 2018, 5 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/733,188, Notice of Allowance dated Apr. 24, 2018, 7 pgs.
“Office Action Issued in Korean Patent Application No. 10-2013-7025578”, dated May 17, 2018, 9 Pages.
“Office Action Issued in Korean Patent Application No. 10-2013-7025540”, dated Jul. 13, 2018, 6 Pages.
“Office Action Issued in Korean Patent Application No. 1020137025586”, dated May 21, 2018, 12 Pages.
“Office Action Issued in European Patent Application No. 12763866.6”, dated Jun. 27, 2018, 8 Pages.
“Office Action Issued in European Patent Application No. 12764494.6”, dated Apr. 6, 2018, 6 Pages.
“Office Action Issued in European Patent Application No. 12764853.3”, dated Jul. 12, 2018, 9 Pages.
“Office Action Issued in European Patent Application No. 12765100.8”, dated Jul. 18, 2018, 10 Pages.
“Office Action Issued in European Patent Application No. 12765896.1”, dated Aug. 20, 2018, 7 Pages.
“Office Action Issued in European Patent Application No. 13739555.4”, dated Nov. 2, 2015, 6 Pages.
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/856,139”, dated Jun. 21, 2018, 19 Pages.
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/271,859”, dated Jul. 13, 2018, 63 Pages.
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/620,567”, dated Jul. 13, 2018, 8 Pages.
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/818,432”, dated Sep. 27, 2018, 26 Pages.
“Office Action and Search Report Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201380035865.5”, dated Dec. 23, 2016, 13 Pages.
Aggarwal, et al., “Human Motion analysis”, In Proceedings of Computer Vision and Image Understanding, vol. No. 73, Issue No. 3, Mar. 1, 1999, 13 Pages.
Azarbayejani, et al, “Visually Controlled Graphics”, In Proceedings of the IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 15, Issue 6, Jun. 1, 1993, 4 Pages.
Breen, et al., “Interactive Occlusion and Collusion of Real and Virtual Objects in Augmented Reality”, In Journal European Computer Industry Research Center, Jan. 1995, 22 Pages.
Brogan, et al., “Dynamically Simulated Characters in Virtual Environments”, In Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, vol. 18, Issue 5, Sep. 1998, pp. 58-69.
Fisher, et al., “Virtual Environment Display System”, In Proceedings of ACM Workshop on Interactive 3D Graphics, Jan. 1, 1998, 12 Pages.
Freeman, et al., “Television Control by Hand Gestures”, In International Workshop on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, Jun. 26, 1994, 7 Pages.
Fukumoto, et al., “Finger-Pointer: Pointing Interface by Image Processing”, In Journal Computers and Graphics, vol. 18, Issue 5, May 1994, pp. 633-642.
Granieri, et al., “Simulating Humans in VR”, In the Proceeding of Center for Human Modeling and Simulation, Oct. 12, 1994, 15 Pages.
Sonntag, et al., “SmartWeb Handheld—Multimodal Interaction with Ontological Knowledge Bases and Semantic Web Services”, In the Proceeding of Artificial Intelligence for Human Computing, 2007, 8 Pages.
Zhao, Liang, “Dressed Human Modeling, Detection, and Parts Localization”, In the Doctoral Dissertation in The Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, Jul. 2001, 121 Pages.
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 17, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/592,638, 12 pgs.
U.S. Official Action dated Apr. 9, 2015, in U.S. Appl. No. 13/077,368, 18 pgs.
“Office Action Issued in Korean Patent Application No. 1020137/025578”, dated Nov. 30, 2018, 4 Pages.
“Office Action Issued in European Patent Application No. 12763913.6”, dated Jan. 14, 2019, 8 Pages.
Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/818,432, dated Jan. 25, 2019, 23 Pages.
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/271,859”, dated Nov. 29, 2018, 49 Pages.
“Non Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/856,139”, dated Dec. 10, 2018, 13 Pages.
“First Office Action and Search Report Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 201610801496.1”, dated Mar. 6, 2019, 16 Pages.
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/271,859”, dated Apr. 12, 2019, 53 Pages.
“Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings issued in European Patent Application No. 12764853.3”, dated Apr. 2, 2019, 10 Pages.
“Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings issued in European Patent Application No. 12765100.8”, dated Apr. 2, 2019, 11 Pages.
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/818,432”, dated May 31, 2019, 25 Pages.
“Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings in European Patent Application No. 12763866.6”, dated May 9, 2019, 7 Pages.
“Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings issued in European Patent Application No. 12764494.6”, dated Aug. 7, 2019, 12 Pages.
“Second Office Action Issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 2016108/014961”, dated Sep. 12, 2019, 5 Pages.
“Siri—The Personal Assistant on your Phone”, Retrieved From: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MpjpVAB06O4, Feb. 4, 2010, 4 Pages.
“Final Office Action Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/856,139”, dated Jul. 1, 2019, 16 Pages.
“Notice of Allowance Issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/818,432”, dated Oct. 17, 2019, 20 Pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20120254227 A1 Oct 2012 US