Patent Grant
9818249
The present invention relates to the field of object authentication and counterfeit detection, and more particularly to improved hardware devices and methods of use thereof.
The issues of authentication and counterfeit deterrence can be important in many contexts. Bills of currency, stock and bond certificates, credit cards, passports, bills of lading, as well as many other legal documents (e.g., deeds, wills, etc.) all must be reliably authentic to be useful.
It is typically important, for an efficient stream of commerce, for bills and certificates to be self-authenticating; that is, for a recipient to be able to determine the authenticity of the document, without resort to extrinsic information, upon presentation. Likewise, it also remains useful for additional tools to be available for a forensic analysis of authenticity, especially covert features which might be missed by even a skilled counterfeiter.
In the realm of currency, anti-counterfeiting methods have become quite sophisticated—the use of two-dimensional authentication mechanisms such as watermarks or special threads incorporated within the paper itself are helpful. However, they remain vulnerable to reverse-engineering. Once a potential counterfeiter learns how to emulate the anti-counterfeiting technology, he may use it to his own advantage. Therefore, the simple release of anti-counterfeiting technology into the world can be an indirect pathway to advance the state of criminal technology.
Several methods have been proposed for increasing the security of paper-based certificates. For example, randomly placed fibers are difficult to counterfeit, so that a coding of location and fiber properties becomes a useful scheme. See, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,974,150, 6,246,061 and 6,035,914, expressly incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. This coding may be provided in an external database, for example indexed through a serial number, which allows an on-line authentication of a bill. The coding may also be cryptographically printed on the bill, which may allow self-authentication by relying on the cryptographic security. As with all cryptographic schemes, once the scheme is “broken”, than is, a counterfeiter has available to it the tools to read the information encrypted, and/or create a new code which appears legitimate, the cryptographic scheme no longer serves its purpose.
Therefore, it is useful to provide various types or levels of cryptographic authentication to preserve the value of the authentication feature. Advantageously, both physical and algorithmic impediments are presented, increasing the required skill set of the counterfeiter to achieve a successful counterfeit, and also increasing the costs and risks associated with the activity.
A wide variety of attempts have been made to limit the likelihood of counterfeiting. For example, some have tried to assure the authenticity of items by putting coded or uncoded markings thereon (e.g., an artist's signature on his or her painting). Unfortunately, as soon as the code is broken—e.g, a counterfeiter learns to duplicate a signature, this method becomes worthless for authentication purposes. In the context of paper products (e.g., currency), counterfeiting-prevention methods have also used two-dimensional authentication mechanisms—e.g, watermarks or special threads incorporated within the paper used to make the currency. These mechanisms are clearly helpful, but they can also be overcome. For example, counterfeiters routinely bleach a one-dollar bill (in such a way that the colored threads, which mark the special currency paper, are not damaged) and then imprint the markings of a one hundred-dollar bill thereon. Thus, the mere release of physical security materials into the market forms one limitation on their unfettered use.
Other authentication methods have utilized mechanisms that provide three dimensions of data. For example, the holograms provided on many credit cards provide more variables (i.e., relative to two-dimensional threads or watermarks) which may be precalibrated, and thereafter, used to verify the authenticity of an item. Nevertheless, since holograms have a pre-set, or deterministic, pattern they may also be duplicated and counterfeit products made. Further, since the holograms are invariant, they are subject to pilferage before application to goods, or translocation from authorized to unauthorized goods in the marketplace. Authentication mechanisms, which utilize deterministic patterns, are inherently vulnerable to counterfeiting since the counterfeiter, in essence, has a “fixed” target to shoot at. High security schemes, such as military codes, have encryption keys that change frequently. This method, however, assists prospectively in securing valuable time-sensitive information, and does not prevent subsequent decryption of a previously transmitted message. At the other end of the spectrum, a random element-based authentication mechanism would provide an incessantly “moving” and nonrepeating target that would be practically impossible to undetectably duplicate, without knowledge of the encoding scheme.
Finally, although existing authentication mechanisms provide adequate protection against counterfeiting in some contexts, increasingly powerful tools are available to decode encrypted messages, making more secure schemes necessary for long-term protection. For example, in conjunction with its monitoring and surveillance activities, governments routinely seek to break or circumvent encryption codes. The technologies employed are then quickly adopted by the private sector, and indeed government regulations seek to maintain weak encryption standards, facilitating code-breaking. In addition to computers, current counterfeiters have access to extremely powerful tools for undermining physical copy-protection schemes—e.g., color photocopying equipment, reverse engineering of semiconductor chips, etc. These factors have combined to continually provoke strong demand for new methods and mechanisms for authenticating items, especially methods and mechanisms that are less vulnerable to counterfeiting and/or employ new copy-protection mechanisms.
More recently, techniques have evolved for authentication of digital information, for example based on cryptological techniques. However, these techniques do not serve to verify the authenticity of a particular copy of the information. In fact, modern digital content protection schemes do seek to prevent digital copying of content; however, these rely on secure hardware for storage of the digital content, and a breach of hardware security measures results in copyable content with no distinction between an original and a copy thereof.
A number of modern systems implement challenge-response authentication, which provide enhanced security for encryption keys and encrypted content. See, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,028,937 (Tatebayashi et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 6,026,167 (Aziz), U.S. Pat. No. 6,009,171 (Ciacelli et al.) (Content Scrambling System, or “CSS”), U.S. Pat. No. 5,991,399 (Graunke et al.), U.S. Pat. No. 5,948,136 (Smyers) (IEEE 1394-1995), and U.S. Pat. No. 5,915,018 (Aucsmith), expressly incorporated herein by reference, and Jim Wright and Jeff Robillard (Philsar Semiconductor), “Adding Security to Portable Designs”, Portable Design, March 2000, pp. 16-20.
The present invention therefore addresses instances where the issue is not merely whether the information is authentic, but rather whether the information is authentic (and unaltered), and the copy itself an original. Obviously, known techniques may be used to authenticate the content of a document, for example, by providing self-authenticating digital signatures, remote database authentication, trusted intermediary techniques, and the like. Likewise, numerous techniques are available for providing self-authenticating features for the physical medium, for example, security threads, inks, papers and watermarks, printing techniques (e.g., intaglio printing, microlithography), fluorescent inks and/or fibers, steganographic patterns, magnetic and/or electrical/electronic patterns, and the like.
In fact, database techniques are known for authenticating objects associated with documents (labels or certificates), in which the document is both self-authenticating and may further reference a remote database with authentication information for the document or associated object. These techniques, however, are not intended to primarily secure the document itself, and thus the techniques fail to particularly address document content security and authentication, as well as models for commercial exploitation thereof.
It is known that the color of an object can be represented by three values, and that the color may be used for identification and authentication. For example, the color of an object can be represented by red, green and blue values, an intensity value and color difference values, by a CIE value, or by what are known as “tristimulus values” or numerous other orthogonal combinations. For most tristimulus systems, the three values are orthogonal; i.e., any combination of two elements in the set cannot be included in the third element. One such method of quantifying the color of an object is to illuminate an object with broad band “white” light and measure the intensity of the reflected light after it has been passed through narrow band filters. Typically three filters (such as red, green and blue) are used to provide tristimulus light values representative of the color of the surface. Yet another method is to illuminate an object with three monochromatic light sources or narrow band light sources (such as red, green and blue) one at a time and then measure the intensity of the reflected light with a single light sensor. The three measurements are then converted to a tristimulus value representative of the color of the surface. Such color measurement techniques can be utilized to produce equivalent tristimulus values representative of the color of the surface. Generally, it does not matter if a “white” light source is used with a plurality of color sensors (or a continuum in the case of a spectrophotometer), or if a plurality of colored light sources are utilized with a single light sensor.
Tamper Evident Certificates
U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,913,543 and 5,370,763 (Curiel), expressly incorporated herein by reference, relates to a tamper evident and counterfeit resisting document, for example a temporary vehicle registration which may be made of paper or paperboard. The document has a zone for inserting information and a pattern within said zone for resisting counterfeiting. A transparent tape which preferably has a silicone resin coating which contains a wax is adhesively secured over information contained within the zone. In other embodiments, an alteration resistant article contains variable data and includes an outer film having an upper surface and a lower surface with an adhesive secured to the lower surface. A hologram for receiving at least a portion of the variable data on the upper surface is secured to the outer film lower surface and, in one embodiment, the hologram has portions which have release properties and portions which have greater adhesive bonding properties than the release containing portions. These respective portions may be established by providing a release material on certain portions of the upper surface of the hologram and providing adhesive enhancing materials on other portions of the hologram upper surface. The hologram may be embossed and have a metallized upper surface. A plurality of relatively small hologram particles may be provided in the outer layer and/or the adhesive layer. The hologram is secured to a substrate which, in one embodiment, has an upper surface printed with pattern means which are printed to a lesser depth than the variable data. In another embodiment, the hologram is provided as a unit with the outer film and overlies the variable data. This system therefore provides physical techniques for document authentication and preventing content alteration.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,601,683 (Martin, Feb. 11, 1997), incorporated herein by reference, provides a photocopy resistant document, having a background pattern or logo which is printed with solvent-sensitive, dye based ink. The presence of this photocopy-resistant background pattern or logo limits copying.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,949,042 (Dietz, II, et al., Sep. 7, 1999), expressly incorporated herein by reference, provides a gaming ticket validation system and method. This patent discloses the use of a validating system, whereby to deter fraud, a validation code is provided which uniquely identifies an article by a combination of a validator machine and a host computer. The validator machine reads the validation code and relays it to the host computer to check for legitimacy (proper form and availability) and to correlate it to a stored record of indicia. If approved, the host computer sends its record of indicia back to the validator machine for display on a monitor. The method is summarized as (1) printing a validation code on an article consisting of a combination of numbers and/or symbols which validation code uniquely identifies said article; (2) inserting said article into a first validator which reads the validation code and communicates this code to a separate second validator; (3) comparing the validation code with second validator to a list of legitimate and available article validation codes stored in a memory of this second validator and determining if the code is valid; (4) finding a record in the memory of the second validator which spits out certain necessary information correlating to that code (location of sale, date of manufacture, style, etc).
Artificial Watermarks
U.S. Pat. No. 5,928,471 (Howland, et al. Jul. 27, 1999), expressly incorporated herein by reference, relates to improved security features for paper, and in particular to a method of making paper and transparentising selected areas of paper to provide enhanced security features. The invention thus provides a method of making paper comprising the step of depositing fibers onto a support surface to form a porous absorbent sheet, applying a transparentising resin to at least portion of said porous sheet and subsequently impregnating the porous sheet with a sizing resin.
The following patents, expressly incorporated herein by reference, provide enhanced security features for use with finished paper and for non-currency and non-security papers. EP-A2-0203499 discloses a method of applying a pseudo watermark to paper. This method comprises the preparation of a paper containing thermally sensitive material, the presence of which renders the translucency of the paper variable by temperature change. When heat is subsequently applied to a part of the surface of the paper, a region of the paper becomes semi-translucent. U.S. Pat. No. 2,021,141 (Boyer, November 1935) discloses a method of applying pseudo watermarks to paper, by applying a resinous composition to finished paper which permeates the paper and causes it to become more transparent, or translucent, than the surrounding area. GB-A-1489084 describes a method of producing a simulated watermark in a sheet of paper. The sheet is impregnated in the desired watermark pattern with a transparentising composition which, when submitted to ultra violet radiation, polymerizes to form a simulated watermark. U.S. Pat. No. 5,118,526 (Allen, et al., Jun. 2, 1992) describes a method of producing simulated watermarks by applying heat, in the desired watermark pattern, onto a thin solid matrix of waxy material placed in contact with a sheet of paper. This results in an impression of a durable translucent watermark. U.S. Pat. No. 4,513,056 (Vernois, et al., Apr. 23, 1985) relates to a process for rendering paper either wholly or partially transparent by impregnation in a special bath of a transparentization resin and subsequent heat cross-linking of the resin. EP-A1-0388090 describes a method of combining a see-through or print-through feature with a region of paper which has a substantially uniform transparency which is more transparent than the majority of the remainder of the sheet. JP 61-41397 discloses a method for making paper transparent and a method for its manufacture for see-through window envelopes. The method utilizes the effect of causing ink cross-linked by ultra-violet rays to permeate paper thus causing that part of the paper to become transparent.
Copy Resistant Printing Techniques
U.S. Pat. No. 5,946,103 (Curry, Aug. 31, 1999), expressly incorporated herein by reference, relates to halftone patterns for trusted printing. Predetermined machine and/or human readable information is embedded in at least one serpentine pattern that is printed on each original document, so that any given instance of such a document can be later verified or refuted as being the original by determining whether this information can be recovered from the document or not. The method for verifying the originality of printed documents, said comprises providing at least one trusted printer for printing original documents, embedding predetermined information in each of the original documents in at least one halftone pattern that is composed of halftone cells, each of the cells containing a fill pattern which is symmetric about a central axis of the cell, with the information being represented by the angular orientations of the respective axis of symmetry of at least some of the cells; and classifying the documents as original documents only if said predetermined information can be recovered therefrom. Thus, the technique relies on information which can be readily printed but not readily photocopied.
Self-clocking glyph codes have been developed for embedding machine readable digital data in images of various descriptions. See, for example, Bloomberg et al. (U.S. Pat. Application, filed May 10, 1994 under Ser. No. 08/240,798) for Self-Clocking Glyph Codes and U.S. Pat. No. 5,453,605 (Hecht et al., Sep. 26, 1995) for Global Addressability for Self-Clocking Glyph Codes. To integrate these glyph codes into line art images, the data typically are embedded in small, similarly sized, spatially formatted, elliptical or slash-like marks or “glyphs” which are slanted to the left or right in generally orthogonal orientations to encode binary zeros (“0's”) or ones (“1's”), respectively. Customarily, these glyphs are written on a spatially periodic, two-dimensional lattice of centers at a density that enables up to about 500 bytes of data per square inch to be stored on a document. These glyph codes are well suited for incorporating digital data channels into textual and other types of line art images.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,193,853 (Wicker, Mar. 16, 1993), and U.S. Pat. No. 5,018,767 (Wicker, May 28, 1991), incorporated herein by reference, provide anti-counterfeiting methods wherein a marked image has a minute dot or line pitch which varies from normal scanning resolution of typical copying devices, making such mechanical copying detectable.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,315,112, (Tow, May 24, 1994) for Methods and Means for Embedding Machine Readable Digital Data in Halftone Images, describes the use of “circularly asymmetric” halftone dots for incorporating self-clocking glyph codes into halftone images, and defines a workable approach if the data is confined to the midtone regions of the image in accordance with a known or identifiable spatial formatting rule. High sensitivity, however, is required to recover the embedded data with acceptable reliability from the darker or lighter regions of the image.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,706,099, (Curry, Jan. 6, 1998) for Method and Apparatus for Generating Serpentine Halftone Images, expressly incorporated herein by reference, provides circular serpentine halftone cell structures, e.g., Truchet tiles, for embedding data in images. These serpentine halftone cells have a high degree of rotational tone invariance. The arcuate fill patterns may be rotated 45 degrees with respect to the halftone cell boundaries to produce another rotationally distinguishable pair of halftone structures. These structures have been called Manhattans and also are sometimes referred to as ortho-serpentines.
As described in more detail in U.S. Pat. No. 5,696,604, (Curry, Dec. 9, 1997) for Analytic Halftone Dot Construction for a Hyperacuity Printer U.S. Pat. No. 5,410,414 (Curry, Apr. 25, 1995) for Halftoning in a Hyperacuity Printer, and U.S. Pat. No. 5,710,636 (Curry, Jan. 20, 1998) for Method and Apparatus for Generating Halftone Images Having Human Readable Patterns Formed Therein, which are hereby incorporated by reference, halftone patterns may be generated somewhat differently from the traditional way that halftones are generated. The goal is to more precisely control the way the edges of the halftone fill pattern or “shape” evolves as it grows from highlight to shadow. More particularly, in traditional digital halftoning, turning on an appropriate number of bits in a threshold array generates the desired tone. The array holds a sequence of threshold values that may spiral outward from a central location as the threshold values ascend. Bits corresponding to those locations in the halftone cell “turn on” if the incoming data intensity is equal to or greater than the threshold value for that bit location. This method generates halftone dots that grow asymmetrically, as one threshold after another is traversed through a range of intensity values from, say, 0 to 255. For serpentine patterns, however, it is desired to grow the halftone fill pattern at all positions on its perimeter simultaneously to maintain better control of the shape. Therefore, a two step process typically is employed for generating the halftone fill patterns. First, an analytical shape function is defined which grows according to a predetermined evolution from the smallest shape for highlight regions, through midtones, and finally to full coverage of the halftone cell. In this step, shape information is maintained with “infinite precision” with analytic functions. Second, as the area of the shape gets larger, the fill pattern or shape is rendered as if it were a segment of text or line art with a corresponding shape. The result is more control over the shape and the tone evolution of the halftone because they are defined with analytic functions. Nevertheless, it is believed that would be possible to use the traditional thresholding array to generate serpentines given a large enough threshold array.
There are two main goals when analytically defining the shape function. The first is to define functions that can evolve through growth from the smallest shape at intensity value of zero to the largest shape at a value of, say, 255 in a continuous manner. Any jumps in tone caused by discontinuities in the functions will be readily visible in the halftone images. The second goal is ensure that the functions can be solved for the position and angle of the nearest edge of the shape from any point within the halftone cell, at all stages of its evolution with analytic accuracy. This allows the shape, which is defined by a hyperbolic shape function, to be precisely rendered. The strategy used to create a family of curves is to fix the focal point to a suitable value, and then select a x, y value along a halftone cell side, for each family member.
One of the qualities that causes the tone of serpentine halftone patterns to be substantially invariant to rotation is that there is very little change at the boundary between neighboring halftone cells upon 90-degree rotation. This is achieved by selecting the points of intersection for the curve pair defining the fill patterns or shape to be equidistant from the midpoint of the halftone cell side. Two hyperbolic curves are used to define the serpentine shape, and the points at which those curves intersect the periphery of the halftone cell are selected so that these intersections are equally displaced in opposite directions from the midpoint of the cell side. In order to make full use of the analytic precision with which the halftone shape is defined, the rendering of the edges of the shape typically is carried out by modulating the laser of a laser printer with a precision that is finer than the size of the scan spot. For instance, in the time it takes the spot to sweep out its own diameter, up to eight bits of digital information can be provided for modulating it. Likewise, inkjet printers may also produce modulated dot patterns.
The serpentines printed in full color, with the correct color balance and halftone shapes are extremely difficult to reproduce reprographically. The narrow, diagonally extending, unfilled areas in halftone cells representing the darker tones are especially difficult to reproduce faithfully because ordinary copying tends to cause near neighboring shapes to blur together, thereby degrading (if not obliterating) the shape information and clues that aid in determining cell direction. Without these distinguishing features, the image takes on the form of a “waffle” pattern, and is easily recognized as a forgery. Although typical color copiers are excellent at reproducing the correct tones for high quality images, they must supply their own halftone algorithms to do this properly. They usually have their own electronic halftoners embedded in the electronics of the machine, and these haftoners typically are optimized for machine dependent tone reproduction curves and implementationally dependent halftone dot shapes. Accordingly, it is extremely unlikely that an existing halftone that is not a serpentine can reproduce a serpentine halftone. Another possible method of reproducing serpentine images is to scan them in, process the image to determine cell orientation, then reproduce the original data file required to print an “original”. This requires access to a printer that can print serpentines, an unlikely prospect for the casual counterfeiter.
Accordingly, serpentines are an excellent candidate for trusted printing applications. For this application, a “trusted printer” (i. e., a printer controlled by a trusted party, such as a service bureau) typically is employed for printing original documents that are designed to include one or more serpentine patterns. Predetermined machine and/or human readable information is embedded in at least one of the serpentine patterns that is printed on each original document, so that any given instance of such a document can be later verified or refuted as being the original instance by attempting to recover this known information from the document in question. This is not an absolute safeguard against counterfeiting, but it is a significant hindrance to those who may attempt to pass off xerographic copies or other conveniently produced copies as original documents.
The feature that gives serpentines a large dynamic range also makes them difficult to copy. As the hyperbolas asymptotically approach the limiting diagonal of the halftone cell, the small region of white is extremely difficult to copy without loss of contrast. The resulting “waffle” appearance of the halftone screen conveniently lacks directionality. This makes serpentines a candidate for image authentication and counterfeit deterrence.
Moiré effects have been used in prior art for the authentication of documents. For example, U.K. Pat. No. GB1,138,011 (Canadian Bank Note Company) discloses a method which relates to printing on the original document special elements which, when counterfeited by means of halftone reproduction, show a moiré pattern of high contrast. Similar methods are also applied to the prevention of digital photocopying or digital scanning of documents (for example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,018,767 (Wicker), or U.K. Pat. Application No. GB2,224,240 A (Kenrick & Jefferson)). In all these cases, the presence of moiré patterns indicates that the document in question is counterfeit. Another known method provides a moiré effect used to make visible an image en coded on the document (as described, for example, in the section “Background” of U.S. Pat. No. 5,396,559 (McGrew, Mar. 7, 1995)), based on the physical presence of that image on the document as a latent image, using the technique known as “phase modulation”. In this technique, a uniform line grating or a uniform random screen of dots is printed on the document, but within the pre-defined borders of the latent image on the document the same line grating (or respectively, the same random dot-screen) is printed in a different phase, or possibly in a different orientation. For a layman, the latent image thus printed on the document is hard to distinguish from its background; but when a reference transparency consisting of an identical, but unmodulated, line grating (respectively, random dot-screen) is superposed on the document, thereby generating a moiré effect, the latent image pre-designed on the document becomes clearly visible, since within its pre-defined borders the moiré effect appears in a different phase than in the background.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,039,357 (Kendrick, Mar. 21, 2000), expressly incorporated herein by reference, relates to security bands to prevent counterfeiting with color copies. A protected/security document is provided that foils counterfeiting even if a laser photocopy machine is utilized. The document has at least three discrete half-tone printed bands disposed on its surface, provided by dots or lines. Each printed band has a different screen density and within each bands the dots or lines comprise a warning word or symbol (e.g. “Void”), or a background. The dots or lines of either the “Void” or background drop out when photocopied, while the dots or lines of the other do not. The dots or lines that do not drop out may be dimensioned so that there are about 24-34 per centimeter, while for those that do drop out there are about 52-64 per centimeter. The bands are typically arranged either linearly or in concentric circles, and interband areas having density gradually transitioning between the densities of adjacent bands are provided. The total density variation between discrete bands is typically about 10-35%, depending upon ink color, typically about 1.0-10% gradation between adjacent bands. Full tone indicia, which does readily reproduce, is also printed on the substrate.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,995,638 (Amidror, et al., Nov. 30, 1999), incorporated herein by reference, relates to methods and apparatus for authentication of documents by using the intensity profile of moiré patterns, occurring between superposed dot-screens. By using a specially designed basic screen and master screen, where at least the basic screen is comprised in the document, a moiré intensity profile of a chosen shape becomes visible in their superposition, thereby allowing the authentication of the document. If a microlens array is used as a master screen, the document comprising the basic screen may be printed on an opaque reflective support, thereby enabling the visualization of the moiré intensity profile by reflection. Automatic document authentication is supported by an apparatus comprising a master screen, an image acquisition means such as a CCD camera and a comparing processor whose task is to compare the acquired moiré intensity profile with a prestored reference image. Depending on the match, the document handling device connected to the comparing processor accepts or rejects the document. An important advantage is that the process can be incorporated into the standard document printing process, so that it offers high security at the same cost as standard state of the art document production. The system is based on the moiré phenomena which are generated between two or more specially designed dot-screens, at least one of which being printed on the document itself. Each dot-screen consists of a lattice of tiny dots, and is characterized by three parameters: its repetition frequency, its orientation, and its dot shapes. Dot-screens with complex dot shapes may be produced by means of the method disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,198,545 (U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/410,767 filed Mar. 27, 1995) (Ostromoukhov, Hersch).
U.S. Pat. No. 6,014,453 (Sonoda, et al., Jan. 11, 2000), expressly incorporated herein by reference, relates to a counterfeit detecting method and device to generate counterfeit probability data and apparatus employing same. Counterfeit probability data are generated indicating that a non-reproducible document is being processed even when the pattern which identifies such documents has been defaced. One set of rules and membership functions is stored in each of three memory sets, for each of (1) an unaltered pattern identifying a non-reproducible document, (2) an altered version of that pattern, and (3) a pattern identifying an ordinary reproducible document. A fuzzy inference unit uses these rules and membership functions to generate data representing the probability that a counterfeiting attempt is occurring. These probability data are transmitted to the copy machine through a control CPU to prevent unlawful copying.
U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,045,881, 6,001,516, 5,919,730, 5,864,742, 5,856,266, 5,843,564, and 5,752,152 provide a label or certificate which contains one or more microdots that are embedded in the label or certificate for providing a non-visual, but machine detectable mark or marks. The detected means for detecting the presence of one or more microdots in the label or certificate inhibits a copy machine from copying the document (another embodiment can include the encryption or encoding of signatures into a plurality of microdots for assigning document ownership). Here the original label or certificate is placed on a bed of a scanner to provide a digitized sequence of scanner signals to a digital image processing unit that incorporates a keyboard, touch screen and/or a mouse, for operator interfacing and a monitor for viewing the scanned image. A printer is directly attached to the digital image processing unit or is attached via a communication link. With either configuration the printer forms hard copy prints. An algorithm residing in the digital image processing unit, detects the presence of the microdot pattern in the original document and automatically deactivates the printer to abort the document copying process thereby restricting the unauthorized copying of the original document. In other words, the microdots are undetectable by the unaided eye, but detectable by copying machines associated with software that programs the machine to prevent copying, when microdots are detected.
Chemical Testing
U.S. Pat. No. 6,030,655 (Hansmire, et al., Feb. 29, 2000), expressly incorporated herein by reference, relates to positive identification and protection of documents using inkless fingerprint methodology. A system is provided for coating a portion of the document with a chemical compound, for determining an image thereupon, including the steps of first providing a document; next, applying a clear chemical coating onto at least a portion of the document; applying an non-visible image onto the chemical coated portion of the document; providing an activator solution; applying the activated solution to the chemically coated portion of the document to reveal the image thereupon; identifying the stamped image for assuring that the stamped image is not a counterfeit or the like.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,289,547 (Ligas, et al., Feb. 22, 1994), incorporated herein by reference, discloses a method for authenticating articles including incorporating into a carrier composition a mixture of at least two photochromic compounds that have different absorption maxima in the activated state and other different properties to form the authenticating display data on the article, subjecting the display data to various steps of the authenticating method, activation of all photochromic compounds, preferential bleaching of less than all of the photochromic compounds, and/or bleaching of all the photochromic compounds, and subsequent examination of the display data following the various activation and bleaching steps by verifying means to enable authentication.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,507,349 (Fromson, et al. Mar. 26, 1985), incorporated herein by reference, provides a currency security system employing synthetic layers and sublimatable dye-formed images on the layers.
Physical Characteristics
U.S. Pat. No. 4,767,205 (Schwartz, et al., Aug. 30, 1988), incorporated herein by reference, discloses an identification method and identification kit based upon making up groups of microsized particles normally visible to the naked eye with each particle in each group being of a selected uniform size, shape and color. Coded identification is established by transferring a population of particles from a selected number of the groups to the item to be identified and then confirming such identification by examining the marked item under high magnification with a light microscope.
Physical Security Schemes—Films and Embedded Filaments
U.S. Pat. No. 4,157,784 (Grottrup, et al., Jun. 12, 1979), incorporated herein by reference, discloses a document security system that optically reveals erasures or modifications of printed matter.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,391,479 (Buzzell et al., July, 1968), incorporated herein by reference, discloses a card security system that provides a dichroic film covering information on the card.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,880,706 (Williams, April, 1975), incorporated herein by reference, discloses a document security system provided by a fused polymer net within a paper pulp substrate.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,247,318 (Lee, et al., Jan. 27, 1981), incorporated herein by reference, provides a security paper formed from non-woven polyethylene film-fibril sheets.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,186,943 (Lee, Feb. 5, 1980), incorporated herein by reference, discloses a banknote or document security system that provides an optically distinctive thin film structure in the body of the banknote or document.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,445,039 (Yew, Apr. 24, 1984), incorporated herein by reference, discloses an encoded document security system having a security element with a readable physical characteristic.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,652,015 (Crane, Mar. 24, 1987), incorporated herein by reference, discloses security paper for banknotes and currency having a metallized film having fine imprinting thereon.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,552,617 (Crane, Nov. 12, 1985), incorporated herein by reference, discloses a document security system provides dissolvable strips of microcarrier material having encoding thereon which persists after the carrier dissolves. U.S. Pat. No. 4,437,935 (Crane, Jr., Mar. 20, 1984), incorporated herein by reference, discloses a document security system provides a dissolvable carrier web material having encoding thereon which attaches to the paper fibers and persists after the web dissolves.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,393,099 (D'Amato, Feb. 28, 1995), incorporated herein by reference, provides an anti-counterfeiting method for currency and the like having embedded micro image security features, such as holograms and diffraction gratings.
Physical Security Schemes—Electromagnetic
U.S. Pat. No. 5,602,381 (Hoshino, et al., Feb. 11, 1997), and U.S. Pat. No. 5,601,931 (Hoshino, et al., Feb. 11, 1997), incorporated herein by reference, relate to system and method for authenticating labels based on a random distribution of magnetic particles within the label and an encrypted code representing the distribution printed on the label, and possibly data imprinted on the label.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,701,165 (Huddlester, October, 1972), incorporated herein by reference, discloses a method of marking garments with a substance detectable by magnetic detecting devices. When the magnetized substance on the garment part is detected in a process of making garments, subsequent garment making steps are actuated in response to the detection of the stitching.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,820,912 (Samyn, Apr. 11, 1989), incorporated herein by reference, provides a method and apparatus utilizing microwaves for authenticating documents, having a random distribution of stainless steel fibers embedded and scattered in a card base member. Microwaves are applied to a large number of metallic wires which are embedded and scattered at random in a document or a card, and a proper digital mark responsive to a response microwave signature is recorded in a suitable region of the document or card according to specific rules. To check the authenticity of the document or card, microwaves are applied to the document or card, and a response microwave signature is collated with the digital mark. The document or card is determined as being authentic when the microwave signature and the mark correspond.
Optical Characteristics and Detection
U.S. Pat. No. 5,325,167 (Melen, Jun. 28, 1994) relates to a record document authentication by microscopic grain structure and method. A record document may be authenticated against reference grain data obtained from the document at a prior time. The body of the document is formed by base medium bearing the record entries such as text within record site. The grain seal site is located at a predetermined location within the base medium. The unique grain structure within the seal site are microscopic and function as a seal for authenticating the document. The seal site is initially scanned to provide a stream of reference data generated by the surface reflection of the grain structure. This reference grain data is stored in memory for future authentication use. The seal site is then currently scanned to generate a stream of current grain data for comparison to the reference grain data.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,942,154 (Akami, et al., Mar. 2, 1976), incorporated herein by reference, discloses a method and apparatus for recognizing colored patterns. The method includes encoding the colors of individual picture elements in a fabric pattern by comparing the level of transmittance or reflectance of the picture element at pre-selected wavelengths with stored values representing a reference color to generate a multibit code indicative of the color of the picture element. A comparator used for this purpose incorporates an error either proportional to the wavelength or of constant value so that the output of the comparator will indicate identity with the stored value if the input value for the picture element is within a certain range of the stored value.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,514,085 (Kaye, Apr. 30, 1985), incorporated herein by reference, provides a method for authenticating documents by marking the document with an encapsulated liquid crystal, and then observing the document under conditions which exploit the unique optical characteristics of liquid crystals.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,591,527 (Lu, Jan. 7, 1997), incorporated herein by reference, provides optical security articles and methods for making same, having layers of varying refractive index forming an image, which is viewable only across a narrow range of viewing angles and is viewable in ambient (diffuse) light, thus affording a readily apparent verification of the authenticity of the substrate.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,580,950 (Harris, et al., Dec. 3, 1996), incorporated herein by reference, provides negative birefringent rigid rod polymer films, formed of a class of soluble polymers having a rigid rod backbone, which when used to cast films, undergo a self-orientation process aligning the polymer backbone parallel to the film surface, resulting in a film that displays negative birefringence.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,549,953 (Li, Aug. 27, 1996), incorporated herein by reference, provides optical recording media having optically variable security properties. Thin film structures, which have an inherent color shift with viewing angle, provide both optically variable security properties and optical data decodable by optical means. The multilayer interference coating has a dielectric material, which is transparent, and a recording layer made of a light absorbing material, a crystalline-structural changing material, or a magneto-optic material. Data is encoded optically or photolithographically as bar codes or digital data.
The use of optically variable pigments has been described in the art for a variety of applications, such as inks for counterfeit-proof applications such as currency, and generically for coating compositions. They are described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,434,010 (Ash, Feb. 28, 1984), U.S. Pat. No. 4,704,356 (Ash, Feb. 28, 1984), U.S. Pat. No. 4,779,898 (Berning, et al., Oct. 25, 1988), U.S. Pat. No. 4,838,648 (Phillips, et al., Jun. 13, 1989), U.S. Pat. No. 4,930,866 (Berning, et al., Jun. 5, 1990), U.S. Pat. No. 5,059,245 (Phillips, et al., Oct. 22, 1991), U.S. Pat. No. 5,135,812 (Phillips, et al., Aug. 4, 1992), U.S. Pat. No. 5,171,363 (Phillips, et al., Dec. 15, 1992), and U.S. Pat. No. 5,214,530 (Coombs, et al., May 25, 1993), incorporated herein by reference. Pigments of these types are prepared by depositing inorganic transparent dielectric layers, semi-transparent metal layers, and metal reflecting layers onto a flexible web, and separating the layers from the web in such a manner as to fragment the deposited thin film layer structure into pigment particles. These particles are in the form of irregularly shaped flat pigment flakes. These pigments are capable of producing dramatic visual effects, including dichroic effects not observed in other types of pigments. A multilayer thin film interference structure is formed having at least one metal reflecting layer, at least one transparent dielectric layer, and at least one semi-transparent metal layer. Various combinations of these layers can be utilized to achieve the desired optically variable effect. Layer thickness can be varied according to the particular desired characteristics of the pigment. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,135,812, incorporated herein by reference, describes useful thickness being on the order of 80 nm for the metal reflecting layer, 5 nm for the semi-opaque metal layers, and thickness of a plurality of halfwaves of the particular design wavelength for the transparent dielectric layers.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,038,016 (Jung, et al., Mar. 14, 2000) and U.S. Pat. No. 5,966,205 (Jung, et al., Oct. 12, 1999), expressly incorporated herein by reference, relate to a method and apparatus for optically detecting and preventing counterfeiting. Perimeter receiver fiber optics are spaced apart from a source fiber optic and receive light from the surface of the object being measured. Light from the perimeter fiber optics pass to a variety of filters. The system utilizes the perimeter receiver fiber optics to determine information regarding the height and angle of the probe with respect to the object being measured. Under processor control, the optical characteristics measurement may be made at a predetermined height and angle. Translucency, fluorescence, gloss and/or surface texture data also may be obtained. Measured data also may be stored and/or organized as part of a data base. Such methods and implements are desirably utilized for purposes of detecting and preventing counterfeiting or the like.
Fluorescent Fibers and Patterns
U.S. Pat. No. 1,938,543 (Sanburn, December, 1933) teaches that detectable fibers which have been specially treated with a chemically sensitive substance can be incorporated into paper and, upon contacting such paper with a second chemical agent, the detectable fibers change color and become distinguishable. As illustrated in U.S. Pat. No. 2,208,653 (Whitehead, July, 1940), authenticatable paper can also be made by including fibers of an organic ester of cellulose that have been treated with a tertiary amine. The treated fibers are invisible in the paper and become fluorescent under ultraviolet light. U.S. Pat. No. 2,379,443 (Kantrowitz et al., July, 1945) discloses authenticatable paper made by the addition of a small percentage of cellulosic fibers that have been treated with hydrated ferric chloride which has been hydrolyzed to iron hydroxide. The treated fibers are capable of acquiring a deep blue color upon application to the paper of a potassium ferrocyanide solution, followed by an orthophosphoric acid solution.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,839,637 (Willis, Oct. 1, 1974), incorporated herein by reference, discloses the impregnation of spaced courses of yarn in a fabric with a material which is not visible under daylight, but which is visible only when subjected to ultra-violet light, so as to provide guide lines for cutting, or measuring indicia to enable visual counting of the number of yards of cloth in a roll from the end thereof without the necessity of unrolling the bolt.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,623,579 (Quon, Nov. 18, 1986), incorporated herein by reference, discloses a decorative composite article, which may be longitudinally slit to form a yarn product, which has a combined phosphorescent and fluorescent decorative appearance. The composite article includes paired outer layers of a thermoplastic resin between which is disposed a decorative layer comprising a composition including a colorant component having a phosphorescent colorant and a fluorescent colorant, and a resin binder material. The fluorescent colorant is present in an amount by weight that is up to an amount equal to that of the phosphorescent colorant. The present binder material may be selected from polyester, polyurethane and acrylic polymers and copolymers, with a mixture of butadiene-acrylonitrile rubber and polyurethane composition being preferred. The composite article is prepared by coating two resin films with the composition, followed by contacting the films with each other on their coated surfaces and applying heat and pressure to bond them together to form the decorative composite article.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,756,557 (Kaule, et al., Jul. 12, 1988), expressly incorporated herein by reference, relates to a security document having a security thread embedded therein and methods for producing and testing the authenticity of the security document. In order to increase the protection of security documents such as ban notes, etc., against forgery, security threads are embedded in the document that have at least two areas extending in the longitudinal direction of the thread and differing in their physical properties. The thread is preferably a coextruded multicomponent synthetic thread whose individual components contain additives such as dyes or fluorescent substances and/or particles having electrical or magnetic properties. The testing of the authenticity of the security thread is directed toward the presence of these additives and their mutual geometrical distribution in certain areas of the security thread.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,019,872 (Kurrle, Feb. 1, 2000), expressly incorporated by reference, relates to authenticatable bleached chemical paper products, prepared from a bleached chemical papermaking furnish containing a minor but detectable amount of lignin containing fibers selected from the group consisting of mechanical, thermomechanical, chemi-thermomechanical and bleached-chemi-thermomechanical, in an amount sufficient to be detectable with the use of a phloroglucinol staining technique.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,054,021 (Kurrle, et al., Apr. 25, 2000), expressly incorporated herein by reference, relates to a process of manufacturing authenticatable paper products, in which the paper made from the papermaking furnish includes fluorescent cellulosic fibers.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,045,656 (Foster, et al., Apr. 4, 2000) relates to a process for making and detecting anti-counterfeit paper. In this process, a certain percentage of wood fiber lumens which have been loaded with one or more fluorescent agents are added to the papermaking pulp. These wood fiber lumens would look normal under regular light, but will glow when exposed to various manners of radiation.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,035,914 (Ramsey, et al., Mar. 14, 2000), expressly incorporated herein by reference, for counterfeit-resistant materials and a method and apparatus for authenticating materials, relates to the use of fluorescent dichroic fibers randomly incorporated within a media to provide an improved method for authentication and counterfeiting protection. The dichroism is provided by an alignment of fluorescent molecules along the length of the fibers. The fluorescent fibers provide an authentication mechanism of varying levels of capability. The authentication signature depends on four parameters; the x, y position, the dichroism and the local environment. The availability of so many non-deterministic variables makes counterfeiting difficult. Essentially, fibers having a readily detectable, non-RGB colorspace characteristic, e.g., fluorescent dichroism, are embedded randomly within a fibrous substrate. Fibers near the surface are readily identified due to their fluorescence. The fibers are then analyzed for dichroism, i.e., having a polarization axis. The positions of these dichroic fibers are useful for authenticating the substrate.
The fibers are distributed throughout the media in a random fashion during the production process. Thus the fiber related signature is a random variable rather than a deterministic one. In fact, it is not believed that any methods presently exist for copying fiber placement within a substrate. The signature of every item will be different making it more difficult to reverse engineer. For example, two-dimensional images (e.g. in the x-y plane) of papers incorporating the inventive fluorescent dichroic fibers provide increased security over the prior art “blue” threads used in currency. A comparison of a white light image and a fluorescence image showing the two-dimensional distribution of florescent dichroic fibers provides unique information. Fibers lying at or near the surface of the paper are easily observed by the white light image but are quickly masked below the surface. In a fluorescence image, fibers that lie below the surface are also readily observable. A comparison of the two images provides a signature. Furthermore, processing of the paper (calendaring) further alters this image comparison. The pressing process reduces the fluorescence from the surface fibers while not perturbing the subsurface fibers thus depth information is available by comparing the two images.
The fluorescent fibers' emission characteristics will also vary depending upon the angular orientation of the fibers within the media relative to a polarized excitation source. For example, at a given wavelength, the intensity of electro-magnetic energy emitted by the fibers may vary considerably depending upon whether the fibers within the media are vertically or horizontally oriented relative to the direction of a linearly polarized excitation source and a parallel polarization analyzer. Hence, the dichroic nature of the fibers provides a fourth variable for each point along the fiber (i.e., x, y, z and dichroism/emission behavior).
The emission spectrum of each fluorescent dichroic fiber, can provide data on the fiber's local environment. For example, consider the use of the present invention in paper media or in an aerosol application. The local environment of the fluorescent, dichroic fibers cause photon scattering (e.g., the orientation and number density of the paper fibers) and absorption (e.g., varying thickness of the dried carrier vehicle in an aerosol application). This local environment is indirectly observed through the measurement of the fluorescent dichroic fiber's apparent fluorescent anisotropy. This apparent fluorescent anisotropy assumes random values because the process of incorporating the fibers into the media is a random process.
It is not necessary to analyze each variable for authentication; varying levels of security may be obtained by selecting one or more feature for analysis. For example, at the first level (i.e., the lowest authentication/lowest cost), an item having fluorescent dichroic fibers incorporated therewith may merely be checked to see that the fluorescent fibers are present in the item. The particular fluorescent agent used may be kept secret and dyes which fluoresce in non-visible regions of the electromagnetic spectrum may be employed, so copying this feature may be difficult. At the second level of authentication accuracy, an item having fluorescent, dichroic fibers may be checked to see that the florescent fibers present in the media have the correct fluorescence anisotropy. This level of authentication exceeds that of the first level because the fluorescence anisotropy is dependent upon the molecular structure of the fluorescent molecule and the specific processing conditions used to prepare the fibers containing the fluorescent molecules. The third level of authentication accuracy involves generating a prerecorded x-y pattern of the fluorescent fibers in the item (e.g., by logging the particular random pattern of fibers present in a particular credit card when the card is manufactured). When the item is presented for authentication the observed pattern is compared with the prerecorded pattern. Since each item would have a unique pattern, detection of a counterfeit would simply involve detection of a duplicate or unmatchable pattern. At the highest level of authentication accuracy, the x-y-apparent fluorescent anisotropy pattern of the fluorescent dichroic fibers in the item would be prerecorded. As in the above case, when the item is presented for authentication the observed pattern is compared with the prerecorded pattern. Since the values for the variables in the x-y-apparent fluorescent anisotropy pattern are random, this level of authentication yields an item that is virtually impossible to duplicate. Calculations, using the number density of “blue” and “red” fibers incorporated into currency paper as a base case, indicate that the probability of a random repeat of the x-y-apparent fluorescent anisotropy pattern is about 1 part in 101000, an extremely unlikely event.
Cryptographic Techniques
The original forms of cryptography involved the use of a single secret key that was used to both encrypt and decrypt the message (known as symmetric cryptography). One challenge to this technique is the logistics of communicating the secret key to the intended recipient without other parties gaining knowledge of the key. In 1976, Whitfield Diffie and Martin Hellman introduced the concept of Public Key cryptography (asymmetric cryptography). In their system, each person is the owner of a mathematically related pair of keys: a Public Key, intended to be available to anyone who wants it; and a Private Key, which is kept secret and only known by the owner. Because messages are encrypted with a Public Key and can only be decrypted by the related Private Key, the need for the sender and receiver to communicate secret information (as is the case in symmetric cryptography) is eliminated.
Public Key encryption is based on two mathematically related keys that are generated together. Each key in the pair performs the inverse function of the other so what one key encrypts, the other key decrypts, and vice versa. Because each key only encrypts or decrypts in a single direction, Public Key encryption is also known as asymmetric encryption. Encryption and authentication take place without any sharing of Private Keys: each person uses only another's Public Key or their own Private Key. Anyone can send an encrypted message or verify a signed message, but only someone in possession of the correct Private Key can decrypt or sign a message.
The two primary uses of Public Key cryptography, encryption and digital signatures. Encryption messages are encrypted by using the Public Key of the intended recipient. Therefore, in order to encrypt a message, the sender must either have or obtain the Public Key from the intended recipient. The recipient of the message decrypts the message by using their Private Key. Because only the recipient has access to the Private Key (through password protection or physical security), only the recipient can read the message. In order to create a digital signature, the sender's computer performs a calculation that involves both the sender's Private Key and the message. The result of the calculation is a digital signature, which is then included as an attachment to the original message. The recipient of the message performs a similar calculation that includes the message, the digital signature of the sender, and the sender's Public Key. Based on the result of the recipient's calculation, known as a hash, it can be determined whether the signature is authentic (or is fraudulent) and whether the message had been intercepted and/or altered at any point between the sender and the recipient.
In most cryptosystems, with some exceptions, such as elliptic key encryption, the larger the key size, the stronger the encryption. While some people could argue that you can never have too strong a level of encryption, in the world of cryptography the word ‘overkill’ can certainly be applicable. With stronger encryption comes greater system complexity and longer processing durations to both encrypt and decrypt.
Presently, there are four different ‘grades’, that refer to the strength of the protection: Export grade gives minimal real protection (40-bit for symmetric encryption or 512 for asymmetric). Personal grade (56- or 64-bits symmetric, 768 asymmetric) is recommended for keys that are not very important, such as those that protect one person's personal e-mail or those that serve as ‘session keys’ for low-importance transactions. Commercial grade (128-bit symmetric or 1024 asymmetric) is recommended for information that is valuable and fairly sensitive, such as financial transactions. Military grade (160-bit symmetric or 2048-bit asymmetric) is recommended for information that is truly sensitive and must be kept secret at any cost.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,984,366 (Priddy, Nov. 16, 1999), expressly incorporated herein by reference, relates to unalterable self-verifying articles. Self-verifying article creation includes receiving recipient-specific data, encoding a first selected subset of the recipient-specific data and fixing the encoded subset along with other human-recognizable data on a surface of an article. Self-verifying article authentication includes scanning a surface to locate an encoded first data set, decoding the first data set and comparing the decoded first data set with a control data set, which may also be fixed upon the surface, to determine the authenticity of the received self-verifying article. According to one disclosed embodiment, enhanced data security can be obtained and maintained by verifying a machine-readable data set on an object for acceptability against predetermined criteria which may include searching a data base (e.g., an organized, comprehensive collection of data stored for use by processing system(s)) of previously issued articles to determine uniqueness. The transmission may be by wired or non-wired communication. In order to verify authenticity, an encoded data set (divided in two) on an article to be authenticated is read and processed, locally or remotely, to first check consistency between the divided parts, and to provide biometric authentication information about a presenter or bearer of the object.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,932,119 (Kaplan, et al. Aug. 3, 1999), and WO 97/25177, Shachrai et al., expressly incorporated herein by reference, relate to a laser marking system, with associated techniques for authenticating a marked workpiece. Images of marked objects are stored, and may be authenticated through a database, and/or through a secure certificate of authenticity, including an image of the marked object. According to Kaplan et al., difficult to reproduce characteristics of an object are used as an integrity check for an encoded message associated with the object. These characteristics may be measured or recorded, and stored, for example within a marking on the object, or in a database. Advantageously, these measurements and characteristics may be derived from an image of the object captured in conjunction with the marking process. In fact, by storing such images and providing a pointer to the image, e.g., a serial number, the measurements or characteristics to be compared need not be determined in advance. Therefore, according to such a scheme, the object to be authenticated need only include a pointer to a record of a database containing the data relating to the object to be authenticated. This allows information relating to characteristics of the object, which may be difficult to repeatably determine or somewhat subjective, to be preserved in conjunction with the object. An image of the object on a certificate of authenticity may be used to verify that the object is authentic, while providing a tangible record of the identification of the object. Known secure documents and methods for making secure documents and/or markings are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,393,099 (D'Amato, Feb. 28, 1995); U.S. Pat. No. 5,380,047 (Molee, et al., Jan. 10, 1995); U.S. Pat. No. 5,370,763 (Curiel, Dec. 6, 1994); U.S. Pat. No. 5,243,641 (U.S. Pat. No. 4,247,318 (Lee, et al., Jan. 27, 1981); U.S. Pat. No. 4,199,615 (Wacks, et al., Apr. 22, 1980); U.S. Pat. No. 4,059,471 (Haigh, Nov. 22, 1977); U.S. Pat. No. 4,178,404 (Allen, et al., Dec. 11, 1979); and U.S. Pat. No. 4,121,003 (Williams, Oct. 17, 1978), expressly incorporated herein by reference. U.S. Pat. No. 5,464,690 (Boswell, Nov. 7, 1995) and U.S. Pat. No. 4,913,858 (Miekka, et al., Apr. 3, 1990), expressly incorporated herein by reference, relate to certificate having holographic security devices.
It is known to provide a number of different types messages for cryptographic authentication. A so-called public key/private key encryption protocol, such as available from RSA, Redwood Calif., may be used to label the workpiece with a “digital signature”. See, “A Method for Obtaining Digital Signatures and Public Key Cryptosystems” by R. L. Rivest, A. Shamir and L. Adelmann, Communications of ACM 21(2):120-126 (February 1978), expressly incorporated herein by reference. In this case, an encoding party codes the data using an appropriate algorithm, with a so-called private key. To decode the message, one must be in possession of a second code, called a public key because it may be distributed to the public and is associated with the encoding party. Upon use of this public key, the encrypted message is deciphered, and the identity of the encoding party verified. In this scheme, the encoding party need not be informed of the verification procedure. Known variations on this scheme allow private communications between parties or escrowed keys to ensure security of the data except under exceptional authentication procedures. See also, W. Diffie and M. E. Hellman, “New directions in cryptography”, IEEE Trans. Information Theory, Vol. IT-22, pp. 644-654, November 1976; R. C. Merkle and M. E. Hellman, “Hiding information and signatures in trapdoor knapsacks”, IEEE Trans. Information Theory, Vol. IT-24, pp. 525-530, September 1978; Fiat and Shamir, “How to prove yourself: practical solutions to identification and signature problems”, Proc. Crypto 86, pp. 186-194 (August 1986); “DSS: specifications of a digital signature algorithm”, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Draft, August 1991; and H. Fell and W. Diffie, “Analysis of a public key approach based on polynomial substitution”, Proc. Crypto. (1985), pp. 340-349, expressly incorporated herein by reference. Another encoding scheme uses a DES-type encryption system, which does not allow decoding of the message by the public, but only by authorized persons in possession of the codes. This therefore requires involvement of the encoding party, who decodes the message and assists in authentication.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,028,936 (Hillis, Feb. 22, 2000), U.S. Pat. No. 6,021,202 (Anderson, et al., Feb. 1, 2000), U.S. Pat. No. 6,009,174 (Tatebayashi, et al. Dec. 28, 1999), U.S. Pat. No. 5,375,170 (Shamir, Dec. 20, 1994), U.S. Pat. No. 5,263,085 (Shamir, Nov. 16, 1993), and U.S. Pat. No. 4,405,829 (Rivest, et al., Sep. 20, 1983), incorporated herein by reference, provide encryption and digital signature or document content distribution schemes. U.S. Pat. No. 5,600,725 (Rueppel, et al., Feb. 4, 1997), and U.S. Pat. No. 5,604,804 (Micali, Feb. 18, 1997), incorporated herein by reference, provide public key-private key encryption systems. U.S. Pat. No. 5,166,978 (Quisquater, Nov. 24, 1992), incorporated herein by reference, provides a microcontroller for implementing so-called RSA schemes. U.S. Pat. No. 6,002,772 (Saito, Dec. 14, 1999), expressly incorporated herein by reference, provides An embedded digital watermark scheme.
The document content, or a digital signature thereof, may be stored remotely, and retrieved based on a unique identification of the document. The required communications may, for example, occur through use of the Internet. See, U.S. Pat. No. 6,052,780 (Glover, Apr. 18, 2000), U.S. Pat. No. 6,011,905 (Huttenlocher, et al. Jan. 4, 2000) and U.S. Pat. No. 5,933,829 (Durst, et al., Aug. 3, 1999), expressly incorporated herein by reference.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,065,119 (Sandford, II, et al., May 16, 2000), expressly incorporated herein by reference, provides a method of authenticating digital data such as measurements made for medical, environmental purposes, or forensic purpose, and destined for archival storage or transmission through communications channels in which corruption or modification in part is possible. Authenticated digital data contain data-metric quantities that can be constructed from the digital data by authorized persons having a digital key. To verify retrieved or received digital data, the data-metrics constructed from the retrieved or received data are compared with similar data-metrics calculated for the retrieved or received digital data. The comparison determines the location and measures the amount of modification or corruption in the retrieved or received digital data.
Methods that hide validation information within the data being authenticated offer an alternative means to validate digital data. Digital watermarks can be added to data by methods falling generally into the field of steganography. Steganographic methods are reviewed by W. Bender, D. Gruhl, and N. Morimoto in “Techniques for Data Hiding,” Proc. SPIE, Storage and Retrieval for Image and Video Databases III, 9-10 Feb. 1995, San Jose, Calif. This reference also is incorporated herein by reference.
One method of impressing a digital watermark is given by G. Caronni, in “Assuring Ownership Rights for Digital Images,” Proc. Reliable IT Systems, VIS '95, 1995, edited by H. H. Bruggemann and W. Gerhardt-Hackl (Vieweg Publ. Co.: Germany). Another method is given by I. J. Cox, J. Kilian, T. Leighton, and T. Shamoon in “Secure Spread Spectrum Watermarking for Multimedia,” NEC Research Inst. Tech. Report 95-10, 1995. These references also are incorporated herein by reference.
Unlike the checksum or digital signature that calculate a measure of the original data, digital watermarking techniques modify the data in order to encode a known signature that can be recovered. The presence of the hidden signature in received data verifies that the data are unchanged, or its absence reveals that the data were modified from the watermarked form. The method of Cox et al (1995) supra is designed specifically for digital images, and it is sufficiently robust to survive even transformations of the digital data to analog form. However, all the above methods proposed for digital watermarking generally detect modifications by means of an external signature, i.e., no metric that measures the fidelity of the original digital data is used. Consequently, there exists no ability to measure in any detail the extent of the changes made or to estimate the precision of the received data. The steganographic watermarking methods differ from the digital signature and checksum methods primarily by being invisible, and by using the digital data to convey the watermark, thus eliminating the need for an appended value.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,592,549 (Nagel, et al., Jan. 7, 1997), expressly incorporated herein by reference, relates to a method and apparatus for retrieving selected information from a secure information source. A device is disclosed for retrieving information from a secure electronic information source, wherein at least some of the information is in encrypted form and may be decrypted for use. The device comprises: (a) a computer, having an input device and a display device, for selecting information to be retrieved from the information source; (b) an information retrieval device, coupled to the computer, for retrieving the selected information from the information source; (c) a decryption device, coupled to the computer, for decrypting at least portions of the selected information retrieved from the information source; and (d) a data logging device, coupled to the computer, for maintaining a data log of the selected information as it is retrieved from said information source and decrypted. According to the invention, a unique brand code is automatically, electronically added to at least some of the selected and decrypted information, and to the data log.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,394,469 of Robert Nagel and Thomas H. Lipscomb discloses a personal computer or “host computer” a CD-ROM reader and a “decryption controller”. The decryption controller is addressable by the host computer as if it were the CD-ROM reader. Upon receipt of an information request, the decryption controller initiates a request to the CD-ROM reader for the desired information, retrieves this information, decrypts it (if it is encrypted) and then passes it to the host computer. The decryption controller is thus “transparent” to the host computer.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,044,463 (Kanda, et al., Mar. 28, 2000) expressly incorporated herein by reference, relates to a method and system for message delivery utilizing zero knowledge interactive proof protocol. The message delivery system guarantees the authenticity of a user, the reliability of a message delivery, and the authenticity of the message delivery, while preventing an illegal act, and which can prove them at a later time. The system has an information provider terminal including a user authentication unit for carrying out a user authentication of the user according to a zero knowledge interactive proof protocol using check bits E generated according to a work key W, and a transmission unit for transmitting to the user a cipher-text C in which a message M to be delivered to the user is enciphered according to a secret key cryptosystem by using the work key W, and the check bits E. The system also has a user terminal including a message reception unit for taking out the work key W by using at least the check bits E, and obtaining the message M by deciphering the ciphertext C according to the secret key cryptosystem by using the work key W.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,926,551 (Dwork, et al., Jul. 20, 1999) expressly incorporated herein by reference, elates to a system and method for certifying content of hard-copy documents. The system and method facilitate proof that a specific item, such as a document, has been sent via a communication medium, such as the mail service of the United States Postal Service, at a specific time. A bit map image is produced, such as by scanning a hard copy document. Preferably the bit map is compressed into a data string and hashed. The hash file is signed by a certifying authority, such as the USPS, using an existentially unforgeable signature scheme. The original document, a code representation of the string, and a code representation of the signature are sent via the communication medium. As a result, the combination of materials sent provides proof of the authenticity of the content of the document.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,745,574 (Muftic, Apr. 28, 1998), expressly incorporated herein by reference, relates to a security infrastructure for electronic transactions. A plurality of certification authorities connected by an open network are interrelated through an authentication and certification system for providing and managing public key certificates. The certification system with its multiple certification and its policies constitute a public key infrastructure facilitating secure and authentic transactions over an unsecure network. Security services for applications and users in the network are facilitated by a set of common certification functions accessible by well-defined application programming interface which allows applications to be developed independently of the type of underlying hardware platforms used, communication networks and protocols and security technologies.
A digital signature standard (DSS) has been developed that supplies a shorter digital signature than the RSA standard, and that includes the digital signature algorithm (DSA) of U.S. Pat. No. 5,231,668 (Kravitz, Jul. 27, 1993). This development ensued proceeding from the identification and signature of the U.S. Pat. No. 4,995,081 (Leighton, et al., Feb. 19, 1991) and proceeding from the key exchange according to U.S. Pat. No. 4,200,770 (Hellman, et al., Apr. 29, 1980) or from the El Gamal method (El Gamal, Taher, “A Public Key Cryptosystem and a Singular Scheme Based on Discrete Logarithms”, 1 III Transactions and Information Theory, vol. IT-31, No. 4, July 1985), all of which are expressly incorporated herein by reference.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,041,704 (Pauschinger, Mar. 28, 2000), expressly incorporated herein by reference, relates to a public key infrastructure-based digitally printed postage system. See also, U.S. Pat. No. 6,041,317 (Brookner, Mar. 21, 2000), U.S. Pat. No. 6,058,384 (Pierce, et al., May 2, 2000) and European Patent Application EP 0,660,270, expressly incorporated herein by reference, which apply encrypted postage markings to mail. U.S. Pat. No. 5,953,426 (Windel, et al. Sep. 14, 1999), expressly incorporated herein by reference, discloses a private key method for authenticating postage markings. A data authentication code (DAC) is formed from the imprinted postage message, this corresponding to a digital signature. The data encryption standard (DES) algorithm disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,962,539 (Ehrsam et al., June. 1976) is thereby applied, this being described in FIPS PUB 113 (Federal Information Processing Standards Publication).
The data in the deciphered message includes a set of unique or quasi unique characteristics for authentication. In this scheme, the encoding party need not be informed of the verification procedure.
Typical encryption and document encoding schemes that may be incorporated, in whole or in part, in the system and method according to the invention, to produce secure certificates and/or markings, are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,422,954 (Berson, Jun. 6, 1995); U.S. Pat. No. 5,337,362 (Gormish, et al. Aug. 9, 1994); U.S. Pat. No. 5,166,978 (Quisquater, Nov. 24, 1992); U.S. Pat. No. 5,113,445 (Wang, May 12, 1992); U.S. Pat. No. 4,893,338 (Pastor, Jan. 9, 1990); U.S. Pat. No. 4,879,747 (Leighton, et al., Nov. 7, 1989); U.S. Pat. No. 4,868,877 (Fischer, Sep. 19, 1989); U.S. Pat. No. 4,853,961 (Pastor, Aug. 1, 1989); and U.S. Pat. No. 4,812,965 (Taylor, Mar. 14, 1989), expressly incorporated herein by reference. See also, W. Diffie and M. E. Hellman, “New directions in cryptography”, IEEE Trans. Information Theory, Vol. IT-22, pp. 644-654, November 1976; R. C. Merkle and M. E. Hellman, “Hiding information and signatures in trapdoor knapsacks”, IEEE Trans. Information Theory, Vol. IT-24, pp. 525-530, September 1978; Fiat and Shamir, “How to prove yourself: practical solutions to identification and signature problems”, Proc. Crypto 86, pp. 186-194 (August 1986); “DSS: specifications of a digital signature algorithm”, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Draft, August 1991; and H. Fell and W. Diffie, “Analysis of a public key approach based on polynomial substitution”, Proc. Crypto. (1985), pp. 340-349, expressly incorporated herein by reference.
In order to provide enduring authentication, it may be desired that multiple codes, containing different information in different schemes, be encoded on the object, so that if the security of one code is breached or threatened to be breached, another, generally more complex code, is available for use in authentication. For example, a primary code may be provided as an alphanumeric string of 14 digits. In addition, a linear bar code may be inscribed with 128-512 symbols. A further 2-D array of points may be inscribed, e.g., as a pattern superimposed on the alphanumeric string by slight modifications of the placement of ablation centers, double ablations, laser power modulation, and other subtle schemes which have potential to encode up to about 1k-4k symbols, or higher, using multi-valued modulation. Each of these increasingly complex codes is, in turn, more difficult to read and decipher.
As is known from U.S. Pat. No. 5,932,119 (Kaplan, et al., Aug. 3, 1999), intrinsic imperfections or perturbations in the marking process may be exploited for authentication. Thus, a pattern may be provided which can be analyzed, but for which techniques for copying are generally unavailable. Thus, a marking pattern, even applied using standard means, may provide an opportunity for counterfeit resistant feature identification.
In like manner, intentional or “pseudorandom” irregularities (seemingly random, but carrying information in a data pattern) may be imposed on the marking, in order to encode additional information on top of a normally defined marking pattern. Such irregularities in the marking process may include intensity modulation, fine changes in marking position, and varying degrees of overlap of marked locations. Without knowledge of the encoding pattern, the positional irregularities will appear as random jitter and the intensity irregularities will appear random. Because a pseudorandom pattern is superimposed on a random noise pattern, it may be desirable to differentially encode the pseudorandom noise with respect to an actual encoding position or intensity of previously formed markings, with forward and/or backward error correcting codes. Thus, by using feedback of the actual marking pattern rather than the theoretical pattern, the amplitude of the pseudorandom signal may be reduced closer to the actual noise amplitude while allowing reliable information retrieval. By reducing the pseudorandom signal levels and modulating the pseudorandom signal on the actual noise, it becomes more difficult to duplicate the markings, and more difficult to detect the code without a priori knowledge of the encoding scheme.
A number of authentication schemes may be simultaneously available. Preferably, different information is encoded by each method, with the more rudimentary information encoded in the less complex encoding schemes. Complex information may include spectrophotometric data, and image information. Thus, based on the presumption that deciphering of more complex codes will generally be required at later time periods, equipment for verifying the information may be made available only as necessary.
Known techniques for using ID numbers and/or encryption techniques to preventing counterfeiting of secure certificates or markings are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,367,148 (Storch, et al., Nov. 22, 1994); U.S. Pat. No. 5,283,422 (Storch, et al. Feb. 1, 1994); and U.S. Pat. No. 4,814,589 (Storch, et al., Mar. 21, 1989), expressly incorporated herein by reference.
In addition to being analyzed for information content, i.e., the markings, the object image may also be compared with an image stored in a database. Therefore, based on a presumptive identification of an object, an image record in a database is retrieved. The image of the presumptive object is then compared with the stored image, and any differences then analyzed for significance. These differences may be analyzed manually or automatically. Where a serial number or other code appears, this is used to retrieve a database record corresponding to the object that was properly inscribed with the serial number or code. Where the code corresponds to characteristics of the object and markings, more than one record may be retrieved for possible matching with the unauthenticated object. In this case, the information in the database records should unambiguously authenticate or fail to authenticate the object.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,974,150 (Kaish, et al., Oct. 26, 1999), expressly incorporated herein by reference, relates to a system and method for authentication of goods. An authentication system is provided based on use of a medium having a plurality of elements, the elements being distinctive, detectable and disposed in an irregular pattern or having an intrinsic irregularity. Each element is characterized by a determinable attribute distinct from a two-dimensional coordinate representation of simple optical absorption or simple optical reflection intensity. An attribute and position of the plurality of elements, with respect to a positional reference is detected. A processor generates an encrypted message including at least a portion of the attribute and position of the plurality of elements. The encrypted message is recorded in physical association with the medium. The elements are preferably dichroic fibers, and the attribute is preferably a polarization or dichroic axis, which may vary over the length of a fiber. An authentication of the medium based on the encrypted message may be authenticated with a statistical tolerance, based on a vector mapping of the elements of the medium, without requiring a complete image of the medium and elements to be recorded.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,592,561 (Moore, Jan. 7, 1997), incorporated herein by reference, suggests a system that provides an authenticating, tracking/anti-diversion, and anti-counterfeiting system that can track various goods. The system includes a control computer, a host computer, a marking system, and a field reader system, which are all compatible and can be physically linked via data transmission links. An identifiable and unique mark is placed on each good, or on materials out of which the goods are to be made, which enables subsequent inspection. The marks or patterns include areas where a marking agent is applied in an encrypted pattern and areas where it is not applied. The pattern can be scanned or captured by a reader and deciphered into encoded data. The entry can then either be compared directly to a set of authentic entries on a database or decoded and compared to a set of data on the centrally located host database. The marking system provides control over imprinting, allowing a limited number of authorized codes to be printed before reauthorization is required. In order to provide marking validation, a camera captures images of imprints. After imprinting of the encoded marking, an image of the marking is obtained and centrally authenticated as a valid code, which may be stored in a database along with stored pertinent information pertaining to this specific product. Monitoring of the marked goods is facilitated by including a unique encrypted pattern having, for example, a unique owner identifier, a unique manufacturer identifier, a unique plant identifier, a unique destination identifier, and time and date information.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,367,319 (Graham, Nov. 22, 1994), incorporated herein by reference, provides a system wherein an object, such as currency, is randomly marked, such as with an ink jet printer. Counterfeiting of the object by copying is detected by sensing duplication of the random pattern.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,499,924 (Berson, et al., May 30, 1995), incorporated herein by reference, relates to a digital camera with an apparatus for authentication of images produced from an image file. U.S. Pat. No. 5,351,302 (Leighton, et al., Sep. 27, 1994), incorporated herein by reference, relates to a method for authenticating objects based on a public key cryptography method encoding an ascertainable characteristic of the object, such as a serial number.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,574,790 (Liang, et al., Nov. 12, 1996), incorporated herein by reference, provides a multiple-reader system for authentication of articles based on multiple sensed fluorescent discriminating variables, such as wavelengths, amplitudes, and time delays relative to a modulated illuminating light. The fluorescent indicia incorporates spatial distributions such as bar codes as discriminating features, to define a user-determined and programmable encryption of the articles' authentic identity.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,426,700 (Berson, Jun. 20, 1995), incorporated herein by reference, provides a public key/private key system for verification of classes of documents, to verify the information content thereof. U.S. Pat. No. 5,420,924 (Berson, et al. May 30, 1995), and U.S. Pat. No. 5,384,846 (Berson, et al., Jan. 24, 1995), incorporated herein by reference, provide secure identification cards bearing an image of the object to be authenticated. U.S. Pat. No. 5,388,158, incorporated herein by reference, provides a method for making a document secure against tampering or alteration.
U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,191,613, 5,163,091 (Graziano, et al., Nov. 10, 1992), U.S. Pat. No. 5,606,609 (Houser, et al., Feb. 25, 1997), and U.S. Pat. No. 4,981,370 (Dziewit, et al., Jan. 1, 1991), incorporated herein by reference, provide document authentication systems using electronic notary techniques. U.S. Pat. No. 6,049,787 (Takahashi, et al., Apr. 11, 2000), U.S. Pat. No. 5,142,577 (Pastor, Aug. 25, 1992), U.S. Pat. No. 5,073,935 (Pastor, Dec. 17, 1991), and U.S. Pat. No. 4,853,961 (Pastor, Aug. 1, 1989), incorporated herein by reference, provide digital notary schemes for authenticating electronic documents.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,816,655 (Musyck, et al., Mar. 28, 1989), incorporated herein by reference, provides a document authentication scheme which employs a public key-private key scheme and which further employs unscrambled information from the document.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,637,051 (Clark, Jan. 13, 1987), incorporated herein by reference, provides a system for printing encrypted messages which are difficult to forge or alter.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,630,201 (White, Dec. 16, 1986), incorporated herein by reference, provides an electronic transaction verification system that employs random number values to encode transaction data.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,463,250 (McNeight, et al., Jul. 31, 1984), incorporated herein by reference, provides a method for detecting counterfeit codes based on a low density coding scheme and an authentication algorithm.
See also, U.S. Pat. No. 4,150,781 (Silverman, et al., Apr. 24, 1979); U.S. Pat. No. 4,637,051 (Clark, Jan. 13, 1987); U.S. Pat. No. 4,864,618 (Wright, et al., Sep. 5, 1989); U.S. Pat. No. 4,972,475 (Sant' Anselmo, Nov. 20, 1990); U.S. Pat. No. 4,982,437 (Loriot, Jan. 1, 1991); U.S. Pat. No. 5,075,862 (Doeberl, et al., Dec. 24, 1991); U.S. Pat. No. 5,227,617 (Christopher, et al., Jul. 13, 1993); U.S. Pat. No. 5,285,382 (Muehlberger, et al., Feb. 8, 1994); U.S. Pat. No. 5,337,361 (Wang, et al., Aug. 9, 1994); U.S. Pat. No. 5,370,763 (Curiel, Dec. 6, 1994); U.S. Pat. No. 4,199,615 (Wacks, et al., Apr. 22, 1980); U.S. Pat. No. 4,178,404 (Allen, et al., Dec. 11, 1979); U.S. Pat. No. 4,121,003 (Williams, Oct. 17, 1978), U.S. Pat. No. 5,422,954 (Berson, Jun. 6, 1995); U.S. Pat. No. 5,113,445 (Wang, May 12, 1992); U.S. Pat. No. 4,507,744 (McFiggans, et al., Mar. 26, 1985); and EP 0,328,320, incorporated herein by reference.
Thus, there remains a need for a system and method for systems and methods for authenticating goods, including portable authentication devices. Heretofore, such systems have had various shortcomings.
Anticounterfeiting Systems for Objects
U.S. Pat. No. 6,005,960, herein incorporated by reference, provides an anti-counterfeiting system wherein a system and method of marking goods for authentication and tracking purposes is described. A central control unit enables the system by providing an allotment of goods to a host unit. The host unit directs marking terminals to mark particular goods with specific information coding symbols. Goods are either marked directly or are identified by means of affixed features which are marked with encoding symbols either prior to, or subsequent to, affixing to the goods. Following marking, goods of fixtures are scanned to ensure proper marking and then packaged for shipment, and/or they can be checked by illuminating the symbols marked thereon and cross referencing this data with the host database by using a field reading unit.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,397,142, herein incorporated by reference, describes coded threads and sheet materials for making such threads useful in counterfeit-inhibiting garments. The sheet material comprises transparent microspheres, a specularly reflective layer underlying the microspheres, and a polymeric layer underlying the specularly reflective layer and containing particulate matter which may be varied from sheet material to sheet material to encode information and allow identification of the sheet material. The sheet material is split in narrow widths and incorporated into threads.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,527,383, herein incorporated by reference, describes a thread which comprises a polymeric material onto which has been fixed a symbol or repeating multiple symbols which are detectable and readable under magnification. When incorporated into garments or garment labels, this thread is useful in identifying the true manufacturer of the goods, and the absence of such threads would help in the detection of counterfeit goods.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,956,409 discloses a method and system for the secure application of seals. An optical image of a seal is recorded by a computer and encrypted using a key for encryption generated in response to template biometric data from the authorized persons. When a person seeks to use the seal, for example to apply the seal to a document or label, test biometric data is input from that person and used to generate a key for decryption. If the test biometric data matches the template biometric data, the key for decryption will be useful for decrypting the encrypted seal, and the person seeking access to the seal. The test biometric data represents a handwritten signature given contemporaneously by the person seeking access, and is verified against a set of template signatures earlier given by at least one authorized person. Specific signature features are determined in response to the template signatures and used for generating one or more keys for encrypting the seal. Similarly, specific signature features are determined in response to the test signature and used for generating keys for decrypting the seal. Features are embedded in the optical image of the seal, or in the printed seal in the event that the document or label is physically printed, which demonstrate to a person examining the document that the seal is genuine. These features include micro-embedding of biometric data or specific features determined in response thereto, or even the embedding of dichroic fibers in or patterns thereon.
There remains a need, however, for improved authentication systems and methods, providing both logical (algorithmic) security as well as physical impediments to counterfeiting.
The present invention provides, in a first embodiment, an encoded watermark, which includes self-authentication information. That is, a physical process is applied to the paper stock which alters its properties, typically including an optical property. This physical process typically requires special equipment, and is irreversible, in the sense that it would be quite difficult to change the coded watermark on an already engraved and printed certificate or bill. The coding is preferably cryptographically secure, and thus creating or forging the coding requires further information. The watermark preferably encodes a characteristic of the stock which is random and difficult to copy, such as a fiber pattern.
Typically, a watermark is impressed on a web of paper in a later stage of processing before it is dried. At this time, the reading of the location and orientation of bulk cellulose fiber patterns while the web is being processed and before it is calendared would be quite difficult. On the other hand, it would be possible to read the location and orientation of relatively low density optically contrasting fibers, such as dyed nylon threads, as the web is moving at high speeds.
Thus, according to one aspect of the invention, the web is scanned for the location of randomly distributed and optically apparent features which are relatively fixed in location and orientation while still being manufactured. This information is then used to establish a dynamically reconfigurable watermark pattern, for example using a set of binary, ternary or quarternary displaceable pins in a one or two-dimensional pattern, in an area of the web near the features which are being encoded. In this way, the watermark becomes a coded self-authentication feature for the stock. If the code is cryptographically secure, then a counterfeiter would have to both be able to reproduce the paper-making conditions to provide a suitable watermark, and have the algorithm for generating the proper code.
Alternately, a different type of watermark may be used. For example, a reactive cross-linking agent could be used to selectively change the chemical nature of the cellulose regionally, to form a printer code. Likewise, a polymerizable material may be applied and cured to form a permanent pattern. While these processes themselves are not highly counterfeit resistant, the marking may be cryptographically encoded and irreversibly applied.
It is also noted that in stocks which have security threads, such as the metallized polyester film used in new U.S. currency, the stock itself is formed of two laminated sheets. This, in turn, theoretically allows a process to be applied to the interface between the sheets. Since currency stock is highly controlled and itself difficult to reproduce, a coded marking formed in this spaced would also have security attributes beyond an analogous marking formed on the external surface of the stock.
According to an aspect of the invention, for each piece of monetary currency, identification document, other document, or other physical article, an identifier is created comprising encrypted and/or graphic information, where the identifier can be read or determined by a manual or automatic process at each of its occurrences. Preferably, the identifier is physically and/or algorithmically self-authenticating, meaning that the marking associated with the object would, after careful inspection, normally be expected to come only from an authorized source. The information in the identifier may be logically associated with some property or properties of some zone of or the entire substrate being identified, which may be homogeneous and/or heterogeneous in its composition. With respect to paper currency in particular, the preferred features to be encoded are optically readable and randomly determined by a stochastic physical process, have a relatively low density in the whole, are relatively stable over time in their optical properties, position and orientation, and themselves comprise an authentication feature, i.e., are themselves not readily duplicated to form a counterfeit. The identifier preferably is cryptographically encoded, for example using a hash, such as the known MD5 and SHA-1 algorithms, or a public-key infrastructure (PKI) scheme, such as available from RSA. Clearly, strong encryption may be used to provide enhanced security.
It is noted that, while the preferred physical authentication feature is an optically scannable low density fiber pattern, other features may be encoded. For example, high density patterns such as a relation ship of cellulose fibers in a small region, an optical reflection pattern of dichroic flecks in printed portions of the bill, a polymer fiber pattern (which may be clear or invisibly dyed), or other pattern may be employed. It is most useful when the feature itself is difficult or essentially impossible to copy, and the original production of an identifier requires information unavailable to the counterfeiter, such as an encryption key. Further preferred is that the identifier itself is provided on the substrate in a manner which is difficult to replicate or originally produce.
Preferably, the authentication scheme according to the present invention supports both manual inspection and automated authentication. Thus, features comprising the identification are preferably machine readable, and more preferably optically scannable. One set of embodiments of the invention permit standard optical raster scanning of the features to be authenticated and the authentication code, while other set of embodiments require further information beyond a chroma-luminance map of the object. For example, dichroic patterns, fluorescence, spectral absorption, transmittance or reflection patterns, or the like, may be material.
A separate aspect of the invention provides increased security for currency. It is well known that currency typically circulates a number of times before being retired. That is, it is transferred between a number of persons or businesses. Often, the bills circulate through banks, and may include central banks.
In banks and central banks, an environment exists wherein currency is machine-counted and analyzed, at least in a simple manner, to detect worn bills, and possibly counterfeits. This process step provides a particular opportunity to provide more sophisticated analysis of the bills, and further to update information recorded on the bill. For example, this information may include an updated authentication profile, tracking history, and the like. This allows an investigator to review detailed information the bill off-line, and without requiring real-time access to a centralized database of such information. Likewise, such a system allows circulating bills to be “updated”, and therefore permits replacement of insufficiently secure authentication information, and correction for degradation, wear and distortion of the currency.
A further aspect of the invention provides a system and method for imposing or imprinting a marking on an embedded strip within a paper sheet. For example, US currency includes a narrow metallized polyester film ribbon which has a metallization pattern which conveys the currency denomination. This film may be additionally encoded with various patterns, for example by laser, electrical or thermal ablation, photonic substrate modification, or the like. For example, in like manner to the embodiments set forth above, an encoded message may be provided on the polyester film, which may be read using optical or other means. Since the polyester ribbon is dimensionally and environmentally stable, the marking may be microscopic, and reliably read without a high degree of redundancy or a substantial overhead of error correcting codes, which may be required for markings which are subject to wear, distortion, or partial obliteration.
Preferably, the currency is scanned using a suitable scanner to determine a unique characteristic, such as a low-density fiber pattern. The pattern is then cryptographically processed and turned into a binary code. A laser is then controlled to mark the polyester film with the binary data representing the cryptographic authentication code.
On order to authenticate the bill, the stock is scanned, which preferably also acquires the laser marking pattern on the polyester ribbon. If the security feature, for example, a dichroic fiber, then the scanner also analyzes the polarization patterns to detect the dichroism. Likewise, other feature-specific attributes may also he measured for authentication. The encoded information is then analyzed using an appropriate algorithm, to ensure that the encoded message corresponds, to within a desired degree of certainty, and allowing for limitations on the precision of measurement and likely variations in the currency stock over time, to the security features determined to be actually present. If the self-authentication scheme does not verify the bill, a further analysis may be performed, out of the ordinary processing stream. On the other hand, normally verified bills may be processed with high throughput.
As noted above, an annotation may also be printed on the bill, for example a two-dimensional code using infrared fluorescent ink in an unprinted margin of the bill. In this case, the scanner determines the content and location of any prior markings, which may then also be analyzed, and the printer places a new marking in a next-available location. Bills for which there remains no available marking locations may be retired, remain unchanged, or subject to a different parking scheme. It may also be possible to bleach off relatively old markings to make room for new markings. Using a 150 dpi marking scheme, in a quarter inch margin approximately 500 bits per inch raw data may be recorded. If 250 bits are required for each marking, and the margin is six inches long, a total of 12 markings are possible. If, however, an incremental marking update requires only 64 bits, then many more increments may be permitted.
For example, the initial marking includes an encoding of all or a selected portion of the randomly disposed security feature(s). If the encoding is a subset, then the encoding also defines the subset, or permits authentication based on a full bill scan. The encoding also preferably includes the bill serial number, to ensure correspondence with the printer serial number. Other information, such as the identification of the particular scanner or a production lot may also be included. The data is then encrypted using a hash or PKI scheme, or other cryptographic scheme, and error correction and detection codes included. Preferably, an ink-jet printer with a permanent ink is used to apply the marking. The ink is preferably an infrared fluorescent dye, so that the marking is mostly invisible to the naked eye.
The invention will now be described with respect to the drawings of the Figures, in which:
A process for dynamically watermarking a substrate.
A support means is provided for a dynamically reconfigurable watermark, for example a paper calendering roller (in the case of a paper substrate) or a flat press, whereby rigid members such as metal pins are supported in a geometric array, such as a 16×16 or other square, a hexagonal tiled array, and/or in a pictorial pattern or as part of same, and/or as part of a steganographic design.
The web entering the roller is scanned optically using a bar scanner or set of bar scanners (3-8 color, one pass, 600 dpi) to determine a random pattern of security features in the web.
A processor then processes the image to extract the security features and encodes them into a pattern suitable for controlling the dynamically reconfigurable watermark. This pattern may also include a serial number pattern. The scanned pattern (or processed representation thereof) and/or watermark may also be stored in a database indexed to the stock, which for example, may already have a serialization pattern established.
An actuation means whereby said rigid members are individually motivated by command toward the substrate to be marked, such as paper of cellulose and/or other polymeric materials. Example of such actuation means may be solenoids pushing or pulling the pins, magnetic fields pulling the pins from the opposite side of the substrate to be marked, or pneumatic actuators, and/or mechanical actuators such as by gears and pins (for example in analogy to striking a piano string and/or the pneumatic mechanism of a player piano). The patter may be binary actuation, or a higher order encoding. In the case of higher order encoding, the algorithm preferably takes into consideration a neighboring element analysis to enhance reading reliability and correct for “intersymbol interference”, the interrelation of a status of one data symbol with the read value of another data symbol.
An interface is provided to control actuation of the rigid members. This may be a computer interfaced actuation controller, an intermediate mechanical programmer which is itself logically interfaced, or direct keyboard or human graphic user interface logical input, or by some other software designed to record by way of watermark some optical, magnetic, electronic, conductive/resistive, capacitive, chemical and/or some physical property or properties of the substrate, and/or some other information selected for identification and/or authentication and/or tracking or said substrate.
As stated above, this characteristic is preferably subject to random variations and is difficult to copy, this making it useful as a security feature and making the marking useful for self-authentication.
It is also possible for the rigid members to apply heat and/or light in addition to or separately from pressure to the substrate. The heat or light may, for example, modify or cure components of the object to be watermarked. Likewise, a post-process may be employed to prevent modification or unintended degradation of the watermark after implementation.
The “watermark” may also be a chemical or spectroscopically or optically detectable pattern generated by pressure-sensitive components within or upon the substrate, such as by microspheres containing ink visually or not visually detectable. Thus, the watermark need not be a true watermark imposed on the stock prior to or during the final calendaring step, and may be provided separately from the papermaking process itself.
The “watermark” may also be a chemical, or spectroscopically or optically detectable pattern generated by heat sensitive components within or upon the substrate.
Likewise, an optically induced “watermark” may be provided wherein the pattern is produced by photochemical interaction with laser generated or other light, and the substrate is optionally subsequently de-photoactivated (i.e. fixed).
A Process for Self-Authenticating or Tracking Circulated Documents Where Physical and/or Chemical Properties of a Given Document Can Change.
The preferred system according to this embodiment comprises means for measuring and recording properties of a given document (e.g. currency bill) upon the document. Thus, self-authentication schemes are supported.
A processor capable of encrypting the properties is employed, which may be a general purpose processor or special cryptoprocessor.
A printer is provided for over-printing machine readable or other information upon the document, by use of visible or invisible inks, electrically conductive or insulating chemicals/inks, or magnetic ink. The form of the information could be a digital array (e.g. data matrix), bar code, picture, or a set of alphanumeric symbols. Readability can be caused by optical contrasts, magnetic or electrically capacitive contrasts, as a result of the overprinting, comprising a pattern in logical association with said document properties.
The printer is optionally integrated with a reader or scanner, but need not be so.
The reader detects the physical parameters of the information fields based upon utilized fields of standardized geometry, or based upon information within or in association with said fields. The reader can be an optical, electrical or magnetic array sensor or imager.
A registration device may be used to advance the document within the printer, or the printing head within the printer, such that after an authentication of the document new information can be printed upon said document in a sequentially defined area, within an assigned printing zone, for example the border of a currency bill, in a manner to produce one or more printed fields each time the document is authenticated. The reader reads the imprinting, and therefore also defines a sequential unmarked region in which a subsequent marking is placed.
Preferably, a feature of the bill includes dichroic fibers, which have an anisotropic optical property. The polarization axis of the fibers is generally aligned with the long axis of the fibers, and thus it is relatively easy to distinguish a true dichroic fiber from a printed indicia, by analyzing light polarization properties of a fluorescent emission. During an initial encoding, all fibers may be presumed to be dichroic (unless the absence of dichroism of a fiber is itself a security feature), so during initial production, this step may be dispensed with. On the other hand, field authentication preferably verifies dichroicity of the fibers to guard against simple chroma-luminance copying (e.g., color xerography) of an authentic bill.
An encryption system may be employed to provide and encode updated authentication information, optionally together with additional information, which is then printed on the bill in a sequential unmarked region.
For verification, a scanner reads the encoded information, as well as the security features, and confirms correspondence. The updated code may also describe changes in the bill, such as loss of certain surface fibers, dirt, fingerprints, chemical residue, or the like, which may be useful for tracking the bill and subsequent authentications.
A centralized database may also store a copy of the scan or information derived therefrom, the set of markings on the bill, and other information. Preferably, any such centralized database is not required for normal authentications, and is used interactively only in exceptional cases. On the other hand, batch processing using the centralized database may be useful to detect trends and significant threats to the currency supply, such as by “super counterfeits”.
A polymer ribbon is incorporated into currency stock in known manner, in addition to the existing polyester ribbon. This ribbon is specially adapted to be reliably written to with information after it is within the bill of currency, to add information logially associated with some property of the individual piece. This ribbon may incorporate writable optical disk technology, holographic storage technology, or respond to optical, thermal, magnetic or electrical energy to record a pattern.
The ribbon or thread can, for example, be composed of a material subject to a fixable change in optical or electrical properties by sandwiching the bill between an appropriate electrode/nanoelectrode array. For example, a fixable or non-fixable photosensitivity to a specific combination of photons could be employed, e.g., dual photon capture. Further, a chemical could be released in an appropriate pattern by some combination of these processes or by heat and/or pressure that can bring about a machine readable patterned change in properties of the thread. Thus, the chemical composition of the ribbon or thread may be itself a security feature.
The above-discussed techniques may be advantageously combined, alone or in combination, with other techniques, as described in further detail below:
A first preferred embodiment of the invention employs dichroic fibers, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,035,914 (Ramsey, et al., Mar. 14, 2000) and U.S. Pat. No. 5,974,150 (Kaish, et al., Oct. 26, 1999). These fibers have properties that are readily distinguished from most types of imprinted patterns, and further may be dispersed in a non-deterministic manner on a substrate. Thus, fiber pattern in a substrate may be used as a basis for authentication.
A second preferred embodiment employs one or more proprietary dyes which are withheld from public availability. These dyes may be selected having desired distinctive optical properties which are readily detectable. Therefore, by detecting the spectrographic properties of the dye, the object on which the dye is deposited may be authenticated.
The techniques according to the present invention are not limited to the preferred embodiments, and therefore various known security features and techniques may be employed to provide a secure authentication system.
The present invention also provides authentication apparatus for verifying authenticity of media according to the present invention.
In the case of a dichroic fiber, the authentication system provides an optical system that reads an optical image of the fibers while a polarization property of incident light is varied. The light from the fibers is then analyzed to verify that the pattern results from fibers having dichroic properties. The pattern of the fibers is then compared with a pattern determine during a pre-authentication step, which may be stored in an encrypted message imprinted on the media, or stored remotely and recalled during an on-line authentication procedure.
In order to provide improved authentication and avoidance of counterfeiting the present invention utilizes fluorescent dichroic indicators. Materials that are dichroic may have different absorption coefficients for light (i.e., electromagnetic energy, typically ranging from infrared to ultraviolet wavelengths) polarized in different directions. When the energy of the incident photon (polarization) corresponds to the absorption transition of the molecule, the interaction between the absorbing dipole and the incident photon is largest and high absorption of incident photons is observed. This energy is, for example, re-emitted by a fluorescent molecule with the plane of polarization of the emitted photons aligned with the emitting dipole of the fluorescent molecule. Most molecules have the absorbing and emitting dipole approximately collinear. When the polarization of the exciting light is collinear with the absorption dipole, the fluorescent emission will be highest. Light polarized normal to the absorbing dipole, on the other hand, is not absorbed to a great extent, hence, the resulting emitted intensity from this absorption is low. Where the light source is not polarized, the dichroism of each fiber will result in respective polarized reflection, transmission, and emission.
According to a preferred embodiment, an authentication indicator comprises a dichroic material. Preferably, the dichroic material will exhibit a high degree of dichroism. It is not important, however, in what form the dichroic materials are introduced into the media being authenticated. For example, there may be situation where authentication is facilitated by using dichroic indicators in the form of ribbons, rectangles, pyramids, spheres, etc. As long as the indicator's dichroism is reasonably preserved during formation of the article (i.e., incorporation of the dichroic indicators with the article), the shape/form of the dichroic indicator is not important. A preferred form for the dichroic indicator is a fiber. Fibers may advantageously be used to incorporate the desired dichroic behavior into the article since fibers may be incorporated within many processes without detriment to the process (e.g., paper making, weaving, sewing) or dichroic fiber. The fibers may have widely varying cross-sections and lengths. Essentially the only requirement is that the configuration of the fiber not disrupt the underlying manufacturing process (e.g., with aerosol applications the fibers must be sufficiently small to be sprayed). Where otherwise feasible, the dichroic fibers are somewhat elongated since elongated fibers are easier to identify within a matrix of material and can potentially provide more data that shorter fibers (e.g., since different points along the length of a long fiber may be more or less obscured by paper fibers, be closer to or further from the paper surface, etc., and hence, exhibit more or less dichroism). Finally, in some circumstances it may be possible to use fibers of uniform lengths to provide easily verifiable data points—i.e., when inquiring whether a marked article is authentic, one can quickly see if fibers of appropriate lengths are present. Synthetic polymer materials are preferred for the fiber material, e.g., Nylon 6,6. A wide variety of acceptable indicator materials are available at very low cost. For example, polyesters, polyamides, poly(amide-imides) and poly(ester-imides) can be made birefringent. Examples of polymers used in preparing the stretched films having a positive intrinsic birefringence include polycarbonates, polyarylates, polyethylene terephthalate, polyether sulfone, polyphenylene sulfide, polyphenylene oxide, polyallyl sulfone, polyamide-imides, polyimides, polyolefins, polyvinyl chloride, cellulose and polyarylates and polyesters. Examples of negative intrinsic birefringence stretched films include styrene polymers, acrylic ester polymers, methacrylic ester polymers, acrylonitrile polymers, and methacrylonitrile polymers.
Suitable dyes, where necessary or desired, include naphthalimides, coumarins, xanthenes, thioxanthines, naphtholactones, azlactones, methines, oxazines, and thiazines. Rhodols, Rhodamines (See, U.S. Pat. No. 5,227,487, and U.S. Pat. No. 5,442,045), fluoresceins, and flavines are preferred for visible fluorescence. In using dyes, it should be apparent that instead of employing a single dye or modulating the content of a single dye, a plurality of distinct dyes may be added to the fiber matrix, potentially providing distinct and relatively orthogonal coding schemes. For example, Molecular Probes' Alexa dye series includes five fluorescent dyes, typically used to prepare bioconjugates. The absorption spectra of these five spectrally distinct sulfonated rhodamine derivatives—Alexa 488, Alexa 532, Alexa 546, Alexa 568 and Alexa 594 dyes—match the principal output wavelengths of common excitation sources, thus allowing multicolor coding. Of course, various other dyes or compatible sets of dyes may be employed.
Fluorescent resonant energy transfer (FRET) techniques may also be used to label fibers and detect labeling. It is noted that dichroism is not necessary, especially where a complex optical effect, such as fluorescence or FRET is present. Again, by combining techniques, more efficient coding and greater difficulty in counterfeiting fibers is provided.
The dichroic agent can be brought into association with the indicator in a variety of ways. In order to maximize the dichroism, the dichroic agents (e.g., molecules of dye) are aligned maximally; non-dichroism is achieved by a random distribution of dye molecules. Typically, the dye alignment is achieved by a stretching of the polymer matrix during manufacture, which alters an anisotropy and alignment of polymer chains. The dye is interspersed or linked to the chains, and thus is aligned simultaneously. If the fiber is selectively stretched, or selectively annealed after stretching, spatial variations in dichroism will be apparent. The dye may also be bleached, e.g., photobleached, in a secondary process. Since many dyes have a narrow band absorption, such dyes may be selectively bleached, allowing independent control over spatial dye concentration. Heating, or other annealing processes, are typically not selective, and alter the crystalline structure of the entire portion of the fiber. Such selective heating is possible, for example, with infrared laser diodes or even infrared LEDs.
Preferably, when simple fibers are used as the indicator, the dichroic marking material is aligned along the length of the fiber. In this way the fibers will have very different emission spectra (i.e., with respect to intensity) when excited with light polarized parallel versus perpendicular to the fiber axis, assuming the absorption dipole is along the fiber axis. In general, the absorption dipole of the fluorescent marking molecule will not be perfectly aligned with the fiber axis. This is permissible, but it is preferred that the absorption dipole is nearly parallel or orthogonal to the fiber axis.
Where more complex fibers are employed, preferably the transitions involve polarization rotation between extremes. For example, the fibers may be “squished” along 90 degree-displaced axes along its length. Other techniques may be used to selectively orient the molecules in the fiber, for example using magneto-optic recording techniques.
The marking material (e.g., a fluorescent dye) may be associated with the indicator material (e.g., fibers) during formation (i.e., the marking material may be incorporated within the indicator itself), or the marking material may be added to the indicator after formation of the indicator. For example, when fibers are used as the indicators and luminescent dye is used as the marking material a preferred method of assuring maximal dichroism (i.e., maximum coalignment of dye molecules) is to melt blend the fibers and dye and then stretch the fiber. With other fiber/marking dye combinations, it may be possible to achieve satisfactory dichroism without a stretching step—e.g., by dipping the fiber in a container of dye.
The preferred dyes in the present invention are luminescent (i.e., fluorescent or phosphorescent). More preferably, fluorescent dyes are utilized as the marking material. Phosphorescent marking materials may also be used, however. The appropriate dye for use in a particular application will depend upon the specifics of the situation. In general, most preferably a fluorescent dye is selected so that the dye's dichroism is maximized at the intended detector wavelength. The marking dye may be tailored to quite specific applications. For example, a dye that emits in the infrared portion of the spectrum may be used to create an authentication signature that is invisible to the eye yet easily detected with appropriate instrumentation.
The fluorescence signal is preferably provided by a fluorescent dye or pigment doped into the fiber polymer matrix, having a long major axis to align with the polymer chains of the fiber during the drawing process. Known dyes may be used, for example organic fluorescent dyes that have absorption and emission in the infrared to near-ultraviolet range. These dyes are also known for a variety of other uses, such as fluorescence microscopy, chemical detection and tagging, physical photon capture applications, and the like. A fluorescent dye or pigment must also be sufficiently stable, thermally, to withstand the fiber production process as well as uncontrolled environmental exposure. The required/preferred concentrations of dye track those utilized in fiber technology generally—i.e., no special processing is required to combine the indicator and marking materials—except for perhaps an added process step to coalign the dye molecules within/along the indicator fibers as discussed above.
To duplicate labels containing the fluorescent dichroic fibers, a counterfeiter would need to, among other things: duplicate the fluorescent dye used (to produce the same emission behavior at the selected detector wavelength); use fibers of the same general length and shape; and produce counterfeit label stock having the same general number of fibers per a given area of paper. Any attempt to counterfeit the fiber-containing label through a printing-based process would fail since printing would not reproduce the fibers' dichroism, and even the fluorescence would be difficult to achieve.
Thus, at higher levels of authentication, the pattern of the fluorescent dichroic fibers is detected and archived during initial processing thereof (i.e., before the label is circulated). When a particular label is submitted for examination, a detector can be used to ascertain the fibers' position within the paper, as well as its dichroism, e.g., polarization angle, θ. A three-dimensional (i.e., x, y, θ) authentication mechanism can therefore easily be provided by using an imaging device, such as a CCD imaging array, with associated polarizer(s). This CCD imaging array may be an area array or line-scan array, the latter requiring a separate scanning system. The polarimeter may include fixed or rotating (variable) polarizers.
At a highest level of security and authentication, the marked label is measured before it is circulated to record the path (x, y), θλ x,y (polarization angle at wavelength λ, at a position x,y) Aλ x,y (specific absorption at wavelength λ at a position x,y), physical disposition of the fibers within the media (e.g., label). It would be very difficult to duplicate these parameters. This data, or a subset thereof, is formulated as a plain text message and encrypted into cipher text by an encryption algorithm, such as the triple 56 bit DES encryption algorithm or the RSA public key-private key algorithm. In the former case, the authentication requires a secure and trusted party, which holds a symmetric key. In the latter case, the public key is published, and may be used to decrypt the message to determine if it corresponds to the label characteristics.
The scanned pattern on the certificate is captured as a set of pixels, and represented internally in the image processor as an image projected on a surface, with the surface not necessary being constrained as a planar sheet. This processor may provide a raster-to-vector conversion process. The printed code is also imaged, and captured by the processor, for example by optical character recognition, bar code recognition, pattern recognition, magnetically ink coded recording (MICR) reader, or other known means. The projected image is then compared with the ideal image represented by the code printed on the certificate. A stochastic analysis is performed of the types and magnitudes of any deviations, as well as correlations of deviations from the ideal. The deviation pattern, as well as any other deviations from the encoded patterns, which for example represent lost or obscured fibers, noise, environmental contamination with interfering substances, errors or interference in the original encoding process, etc., are then used to determine a likelihood that the certificate itself corresponds to the originally encoded certificate. Thus, the determined authenticity is associated with a reliability thereof, based on stochastic variations in the properties of the authentication certificate and stochastic variations in the generation of the associated secure code. A threshold may then be applied to define an acceptable error rate (false positive and false negative) in the authentication process. The reliability of the authentication or a go/no-go indication is then output.
In order to avoid the requirement for encrypting an entire or substantial portion of a representation of an image of the certificate, the medium may be subdivided into a plurality of regions, each region associated with a vector, which, for example is two-dimensional or of higher dimensionality. The vector, which represents an irreversible compression of data derived from the region, is then encoded and encrypted in the encrypted message. For verification, the vector mapping is decrypted and unencoded from the recorded message. The medium is then scanned, and an analogous vector mapping derived from the newly scanned image. The recorded vector map is compared with the measured vector map, allowing a correlation to be determined. In this case, given the large number of degrees of freedom, e.g., a polarization vector for each region or zone, even relatively large deviations between the recorded and measured vector maps may be tolerated in the authentication process. Thus, an initial deskewing and dewarping algorithm may be use to initially align the regional boundaries to achieve maximum cross-correlation. Such algorithms and image processing systems are known in the art. A cross correlation of even 0.1 over tens or hundreds of degrees of freedom may be sufficient to allow highly reliable authentication with a low number of false positives and false negatives.
The label may thus be subdivided into a plurality of zones, each associated with an encrypted code portion. In this case, since each subdivided zone stands alone, any such zone or set of zones with sufficient degrees of freedom may be used to authenticate the entire label. Where the zones are small or have a limited number of degrees of freedom, the reliability of authentication of the entire label by any one zone may be insufficient. Therefore, a plurality of zones may be authenticated, with each authenticated zone adding to the reliability of the resulting authentication. Any zones that fail to authenticate may also be weighted into the analysis, although typically with a lower weight than zones that correctly authenticate.
The present invention therefore provides systems and methods employing self-authenticating and on-line authenticating schemes, allowing determination of object authenticity by evaluation of a non-duplicable and essentially random pattern.
More specifically, one aspect of the present invention provides a method and apparatus for the production and labeling of objects in a manner suitable for the prevention and detection of counterfeiting, that includes a recording apparatus containing a recording medium having macroscopically detectable anisotrophic optical properties.
In a dichroic fiber embodiment, a plurality of dyes may be employed within the fibers, either using multiple dyes in a single fiber, or a plurality of fiber types, each having different dye properties. Each dye, having a distinct absorption and fluorescence spectrum, is separately detectable. Further, the respective dye concentrations may be varied during the manufacturing process, or later selectively bleached by, for example, a laser at an absorption maximum wavelength of a particular dye species. The dichroism may also be varied, for example by controlling a stretch process during fiber production, or by heating the fiber above a recrystallization point with, for example, a laser. Thus, for example, using commonly available three-color image detectors (in conjunction with an appropriate optical system), three separate dyes may be detected, providing additional degrees of freedom for an authentication scheme. It is noted that, while dichroic fibers are preferred, it is not necessary for each dye to be associated with a dichroic property or a distinct dichroic property. Thus, the dichroism, fluorescence, and absorption and/or transmission characteristics may potentially be distinct characteristics of the fiber.
In another embodiment of the invention, microspheres or other shaped objects are provided having dichroic properties. In this case, the data map includes the position and polarization axis orientation of the objects, which it should be understood is a three dimensional vector in the case of a linear fluorescent emission axis from a dye and a two dimensional vector in the case of a radially symmetric fluorescent emission from a dye. Advantageously, these objects may either be embedded in the stock or applied later, using a printing process, for example lithography, ink jet printing, specialized laser printing (with care taken to avoid undesired changes to the dichroism in the fuser), and the like.
According to one embodiment of the invention, dichroic fibers are formed of nylon having a fluorescent dye mixed into the polymer matrix. During the forming process, the fiber is stretched, which tends to align the molecules along the stretch axis. This anisotropic characteristic lead to dichroism, which differentially affects light of varying polarization axis. Therefore, due to this differential effect, the fiber will have a light polarization rotation, especially at wavelengths corresponding to the absorption and/or emission of the fluorescent dye. It is noted that the nylon itself may also be dichroic, but typically the effect is not easily observed at visible or other easily measured wavelengths; on the other hand, the dye is specifically selected to have useful optic interactions and to obtain a high degree of anisotropism under the process conditions.
The preferred nylon dichroic fibers allow for a number of identifying variations, for example the amount or type of dye in the fiber, optical, heat, physical or chemical (e.g., chemical or photo-bleaching, heating, stretching or fiber deformation) modifications of the fiber during or after fabrication, or after placement in an identifying substrate. As can be seen, a number of degrees of freedom are possible, providing a number of strategies for detection and making duplication difficult. The preferred variations are the amount of dye and physical stretch, both of which can be controlled, early in the manufacturing process of the fibers. Preferably, these two variations are provided over relatively short distances, for example millimeter ranges or smaller, providing a relatively high information-carrying capability, and this allowing relatively short lengths of fiber to provide sufficient information to identify the substrate.
Alternately, a modulated laser may be used to modify the fiber, to alter the dye and/or molecular chain organization. Such laser coding can be applied on a physical scale of microns, and can be controlled to tight tolerances. Fibers may also be used which are selectively sensitive to environmental conditions, such as temperature, humidity, gasses, and the like, so that a change in characteristics, e.g., optical characteristics, is measured based on a change in such conditions. Thus, for example, a document is provided with fibers that change in color with respect to temperature, humidity, or pH. The document is then analyzed in two or more different states, and the differential response recorded. It is noted that, in order to change pH, an acid gas soluble in the fiber, such as hydrochloric acid, acetic acid, moist carbon dioxide or ammonia, is provided in the environment. Other types of dye indicators are also known.
According to another feature of the invention, an authentication feature of a certificate degrades over time or environmental exposure, making long-term persistence of authentic documents in the market more difficult. Such a component is, for example, a dye or additive that degrades with ambient light or oxygen exposure under normal conditions, or even is the result of a progressive internal chemical reaction, for example due to a catalyst dissolved in the fiber matrix. Of course, this degradation limits the ability to inventory and ship normal stock that are intended to be deemed authentic after a long period of time, and compels expedited authentication. However, for applications where a short time window is appropriate, such “self-destructing” anti-counterfeit technologies may be appropriate.
The present invention also provides a recording apparatus capable of imprinting a desired dichroic pattern on a substrate. This pattern, therefore, could be authenticated by means similar to that provided for fibers. In distinction to fibers, imprinted patterns would be pixelated, on the surface of the medium only, and have very limited dichroic properties. A visual examination would also reveal that the pattern was not due to fibers. Thus, a careful examination could distinguish the methods. However, this allows the use of a common reader device to authenticate distinctly different certificates.
The recording apparatus provides at least two transfer films, having the appropriate dichroic properties, which are selectively deposited on a substrate in a microscopic pixel pattern, to yield the desired pattern.
It is noted that, according to the present invention, the optical properties of the fibers or dyes need not be in a visible optical range, and therefore infrared reactive dyes may be employed. Two advantages result from the use of infrared dues and detection equipment. First, the pattern may be spatially coincident with a visible graphic, thereby increasing spatial utilization efficiency. Second, infrared laser diodes and light emitting diodes are less expensive that their visible counterparts, and are available in various wavelengths; and simple silicon photodiode detectors are appropriate.
According to an embodiment of an authentication device, a tag is provided having visible from a surface thereof a low density non-deterministic dichroic fiber pattern, and a machine-readable code defining the fiber pattern. The authenticity of the tag is therefore dependent on a correspondence of the machine readable code on the tag and the actual fiber pattern on the tag.
The preferred dichroic fibers have a relatively narrow optical absorption bandwidth to excite fluorescence, and therefore require either a carefully selected narrow-band source, such as a laser diode or light emitting diode, or a broadband light source, such as an incandescent lamp. In the case of a broadband source, in order to maintain a high signal to noise ratio, a filter is preferably provided to limit emissions near the fluorescent wavelength.
For example, a narrow band diffraction filter, e.g., 565 nm, passing light at the absorption maximum may be provided to filter the light from a xenon incandescent bulb.
The optical sensor system also includes a filter to pass the fluorescent light emitted from the fibers, but block other stray light. For example, a red, e.g., 620 nm pass, Ratten filter may be used. Ascertaining the presence of a particular dye is facilitated by hyperspectral analysis.
In order to detect the dichroism, a rotating polarizer may be employed, while capturing images during various phases of rotation. Typically, the fibers have a dichroism closely related to the physical axis of the fiber. By detecting dichroism, therefore, the existence of a fiber as compared to a normally imprinted indicial may be determined. The detection of dichroic features also advantageously allows digital background subtraction.
Typically, the fibers have a uniform cross section, and thus the significant data included in a fiber pattern is the endpoints and path of the fiber. This information may therefore be efficiently coded, and indeed, much of the information may be truncated without substantial loss of system security.
The tag preferably has a bar code imprinted thereon with self-authenticating information and a serial number. A bar code reader in the authentication device therefore reads the code. The self-authenticating information is then compared with the detected fiber pattern to determine a correspondence thereof. This correspondence may be based on a normalization transform, to account, for example, for image skew or other artifacts. Further, since the tag is subject to change due to environmental factors, an acceptable error rate or fuzzy match correlation may be defined, to avoid false negatives, while maintaining an appropriately high level of security.
The present invention may also be applied to the authentication of optical recording media. According to a first embodiment, an optical disk is provided with a measurable random error rate due to physical imperfections in the optical recording medium. While presently, manufacturing techniques are such that the error rate is low, the base error rate may be artificially increased by inserting impurities in the resin used to form the media, for example a polycarbonate resin. One type of impurity is air-filled glass microbeads (3M) which would have the effect of dispersing light between the read laser and the information pattern, this resulting in random bit errors.
In data recording media, error detection and correction techniques would likely be able to counteract the effects of such defects. On the other hand, in musical compact disks (CDs), which do not employ error detection, such random errors would likely have little effect on the reproduced sonic quality, due to the presence of digital and analog filters in the signal path.
According to the present invention, the position of the defects may be encoded, and therefore verified. It is possible to record a on-off code on a CD, for example by selectively metallizing or demetallizing a circumferential band of the disk in a binary data pattern, which could be read by the read head as a bar code. Demetallization could be effected, for example, by a carbon dioxide laser ablation pattern. The defect data pattern and code are intercepted, for example, at the output of the optical detector or as a component of a digital filter processing the output of the optical sensor. Firmware within the CD player determines a correspondence of the code with the actual defect pattern on the disk, and may block playback of disks that lack correspondence. The player may also use error correction based on the encoded defect locations to counteract the effect of the defects on the signal.
These disks are backwards compatible with existing players, since the errors are generally effectively filtered.
While it is preferred to employ the existing optical pickup of the optical disk drive to read the disk defect characteristics, it is also possible to employ a distinct system. For example, the encoding may be placed partially or entirely on the non-data reading surface of the disk. This encoding may be read within a disk player or separately. For example, a simple LED and photodiode may be provided to read a non-deterministic pattern and code formed on the back of the disk, along a single circumferential path. The non-deterministic pattern may be, for example, a surface roughness or irregularity, a pattern of ink drops or fibers dispersed in a graphic ink, or the like. The code may be simply printed using existing contact or non-contact techniques.
It is a feature of the present invention wherein an excitation source may be employed, the excitation source being a bright light source, such as a xenon incandescent bulb, with a narrow band diffraction filter approximating the absorption maxima filtering said light.
It is an object of the present invention to provide, wherein optionally the absorption and emission wavelengths are narrow, a broad-band receiver having a cutoff filter to block exciting light.
It is a feature of the present invention wherein a polarizer is provided between said broad band receiver and a sample, which rotates between successive exposures, wherein over a half-rotation of said filter, two or more exposures are taken, such that by employing digital background subtraction, the dichroic fibers, which show maximum variance with respect to rotational angle of the filter as compared to background signals, are extracted.
According to the present invention, the label or certificate may be provided with codes having a multiplicity of levels. Thus, even if a first level code is broken, one or more backup codes may then be employed. The advantage of this system over a single level complex code is that the complexity of the detection devices used in the first instance may be reduced, and the nature and even existence of the higher level codes need not be revealed until necessary.
In order to prevent mass duplication of labels or certificates, it is preferable to encrypt and print a code representing varying characteristic of the label or certificate. In verifying the code, the associated characteristics must correspond. Such a system adds markedly to the complexity of any counterfeiting scheme, while still allowing labeling or goods and production of certificates to proceed. In a simpler system, the mere repetition of supposedly random or pseudorandom codes is detected, indicating simple copying.
In order to prevent the replacement of an authentic label on a different item, a unique, random or quasi-unique characteristic of the item is encoded on the label. In this way, relocation of the label to other goods may be detected.
In order to provide robustness against encryption cracking, a plurality of encoding schemes may be employed, for example to avoid complete system failure if one of the encoding schemes is “broken”. For example, three different codes may be provided on the certificate, employing three different algorithms, and potentially based on three different sets of criteria.
Preferably, the encoding and authentication employ a system which prevents tampering, reverse engineering or massive interrogation, which might lead to a determination of the underlying algorithm and/or the generation of valid codes for counterfeit goods. Thus, for example, a secure central server may provide authentication services, over secure communications channels.
Self-authentication may be based on a public key algorithm, however, unless this algorithm is highly secure, this is not preferred for high security applications, but may be acceptable in moderate security applications. The risk is that if the private (secret) encryption key is discovered or released, the usefulness of the encoding is lost, and further, until the pool of authentic goods bearing the broken encoding is depleted, counterfeiters may continue undetected. Self-authentication schemes are subject to sequential cracking attempts until the code is broken; once an authentication code (private key) is discovered, it may be used repeatedly.
It is noted that the imprinted code on the certificate need not be visible and/or comprehensible, but rather may itself be a security feature. Thus, special inks, printing technologies, or information storage schemes may be employed. Preferably, proprietary dyes having unique detectable optical signatures are employed.
Another embodiment of the invention provides an authenticatable sealing tape. The tape is imprinted with a machine readable code, which, for example, uniquely identifies the tape portion at repetitive intervals, e.g., every 2 inches. The tape also includes a set of fiducials as physical landmarks and a dichroic fiber pattern, for example due to a low density of fibers adhered to the adhesive side of the tape in a non-deterministic pattern. The tape is tamper evident, such that if the tape is cut or removed, evidence remains of this tampering.
Prior to spooling, the codes and associated fiber patterns are recorded in a database.
When applied, the contents of the sealed container are identified, and the tape identification scanned, with the contents thereafter associated with the identification of the tape. During authentication, the tape is again scanner for identification and fiber pattern, which is then authenticated on-line to ensure authenticity.
While the tape may also be self-authenticating, this poses the issue of false positive authentications if a spool of tape is stolen, since the imprint on the tape does not relate to the contents of the sealed container.
One embodiment of the present invention thus solves the above noted problems and overcomes suboptimizations inherent in the prior art by providing an authentication mechanism utilizing fluorescent dichroic fibers. The fibers are randomly and non-deterministically embedded into or form a part of a substrate. This means that by studying any one substrate, the pattern in any other substrate, and therefore a code representing that pattern, is not made apparent. This pattern may be stored in a database with an identification of the substrate, indexing the stored characteristics of the substrate, and/or encoded on the substrate with an imprinted encrypted code.
The preferred system incorporates a sheet of material, the authentication certificate or label, impregnated with dichroic fibers containing a fluorescent dye, that combines to form a high security system to thwart counterfeiting in a wide range of applications. Dichroic polymer fibers may also form part of the object to be authenticated. These fibers are relatively difficult to produce, and their embedding into paper or woven goods requires special equipment. Further, these fibers are observable with the naked eye, discouraging low sophistication attempted counterfeiting of certificates without this feature. This system allows for instant field verification of labels while maintaining a high level of security against counterfeiting by making the reverse engineering process extremely difficult and expensive. No two labels are ever alike, yet they can be produced very economically. In order to determine if the imprinted code corresponds to the certificate itself, the fiber pattern, which is completely random, is illuminated by a light and read by a scanner. The resulting pattern is then compared to the encoded pattern to determine authenticity.
According to a preferred embodiment, the pattern on the certificate is represented as an image projected on a surface, with the surface not necessary being constrained as a planar sheet. Therefore, relative deformations of the certificate pattern may be resolved through mathematical analysis using known techniques. The relative deformations, as well as any other deviations from the encoded patterns, which for example may represent lost or obscured fibers, noise, environmental contamination with interfering substances, errors or interference in the original encoding process, etc., are then used to determine a likelihood that the certificate itself corresponds to the originally encoded certificate. Thus, the determined authenticity is associated with a reliability thereof, based on stochastic variations in the properties of the authentication certificate and stochastic variations in the generation of the associated secure code. A threshold may then be applied to define an acceptable error rate (false positive and false negative) in the authentication process.
To produce an informational level of security which allows authentication without accessing a central information repository (database), the location or particular characteristics of the dichroic fibers, which are random or unique, are determined, and used to generate an encrypted code, wherein the encryption algorithm key (or private key) is maintained in secrecy. Therefore, the code must match the dichroic fiber location or characteristics for authentication of the certificate. Since the dichroic properties provide a characteristic which existing duplication systems cannot control, the certificate with encoding is very difficult to undetectably duplicate.
According to another embodiment of the invention, fibers may be provided with spatial variation in patterns, such as dichroism, color, coating thickness, or the like, providing additional, and difficult to reproduce, degrees of freedom into the security scheme. These variations may be random or relatively unique, and, for example, may include enough information content to uniquely identify the object. For example, the polarization angle along the length of a dichroic fiber may be controlled by altering a “stretch” of the fiber during fabrication, or post modification, for example by laser diode heating to form a polarization angle pattern on the fiber which varies over distance. The pattern may be truly random, or pseudorandom, with an arbitrarily large repetition interval or have a regular pattern. In any case, as the fiber (either on the object or the certificate itself) is being encoded on an authentication certificate, the fiber is analyzed for the particular property, and this property and possible the relationship to other properties, used, in part, to encode the certificate. It is noted that the replication of such patterns on fibers is particularly difficult, making this a useful additional security feature beyond the mere presence of dichroic fibers.
As stated above, the fiber may be imparted with a varying dichroic characteristic by selectively dying or bleaching a fiber or by inducing dichroism by selectively stretching portions of the fiber. In one embodiment, a beam of light, e.g., a laser, may be used to excite and selectively bleach dye within the fiber, providing a system for “writing” information to the fiber. In another embodiment, the fiber or substrate is coated with a magneto-optic recording layer which is selectively heated above the Curie temperature and selectively subjected to a magnetic field to induce a measurable light polarization effect.
The fiber may be modified during or in conjunction with the manufacturing process, or at a point of use. When a laser is used to modify the fiber, it heat the fiber, thereby altering the alignment of molecules, and/or it may bleach the dye in the fiber, thus reducing the concentration of the fluorescent species. The laser may be driven in a regular pattern, a random pattern, a pseudorandom pattern, or in a chaotic state of operation. In the latter case, the inherent instability of the laser is employed. It is noted that, according to the method of VanWiggeren and Roy, “Communication with Chaotic Lasers”, Science, 279:1198-1200 (Feb. 20, 1998), an information signal may be modulated onto the laser output and masked by the chaotic variations, providing an encrypted data signal. By replicating the state of a receiving system laser having similar characteristics, including parameters of operation and starting state, it is possible to decode the data from the output signal. See Also, Gauthier, D. J., “Chaos Has Come Again”, Science, 279:1156-1157 (Feb. 20, 1998). Thus, for example, a serial number or other coding may be imparted to the fiber which would be difficult to detect or duplicate without knowledge of the encoding system parameters, providing an additional level of security.
The label formed with the fibers may be identified based on an identifying location of the fibers, and/or identifying characteristics of the fibers. The fibers may be randomly dispersed in a carrier material, at such density to allow reliable identification, but without obscuring identifying features. For example, the fibers may be mixed into pulp to form paper, such as in the process used for U.S. currency. The locations of the fibers are then determined, allowing a correlation between the fiber locations and the identity of the substrate.
The present invention thus encompasses a system that reads a unique characteristic of a label or certificate and imprints thereon an encrypted message defining the unique characteristic, making the label or certificate self-authenticating. Optionally, a unique or identifying characteristic of an object associated with a label or certificate may be further ascertained and printed as an encrypted message on the label, uniquely associating the label or certificate with the object. Preferably, the characteristic of the object is a random tolerance or highly variable aspect, which is difficult to recreate, yet which is comparatively stable over time so that measurements are relatively repeatable. Where the characteristic changes over time, preferably these changes are predictable or provide identification, such as of the date of manufacture. As stated above, the authentication algorithm may compensate or take into consideration “normal” changes or deviations, thus minimizing rechecks or manual examination of the certificates or labels.
The labeling system therefore includes a reader, for reading the unique characteristics of the label or certificate, such as a polarization sensitive imaging device for reading a distribution of dichroic fibers embedded in paper, and optionally a device which measures an identifying characteristic of the object to be labeled, such as a dimension, tolerance, color, sewing or thread pattern, etc. This information is then encrypted using an algorithm, to produce an encrypted message, which is then printed in the label, for example using a dye sublimation or ink jet printer. The encryption is preferably a multilevel system, for example including a 40-bit algorithm, a 56-bit algorithm, a 128 bit elliptic algorithm, and a 1024 bit algorithm. Each message level is preferably printed separately on the label, for example, the 40 bit encrypted message as an alphanumeric string, the 56 bit encrypted message as a binary or bar code, the 128 bit elliptic encrypted message as a two-dimensional matrix code and the 1024 bit algorithm as a pseudorandom placement of dots of one or more colors on the face of the label. Alternately, the higher level messages may be encrypted by the lower level algorithms, providing a multiple encryption system. Preferably, each encrypted message corresponds to successively more detailed information about the label and/or the object, optionally with redundant encoding or potentially without any overlap of encoded information. This system allows readers to be placed in the field to be successively replaced or upgraded over time with readers that decode the more complex codes. By limiting use of the more complex codes, and release of corresponding code readers, until needed, the risk of premature breaking these codes is reduced. In addition, the use of codes of varying complexity allows international use even where export or use restrictions are in place of the reader devices.
The invention also provides a reader adapted to read the characteristic of the label corresponding to the encoded characteristic, optionally sense or input the characteristic of the associated object, and either manually or automatically verifies the printed code on the label. If the code verifies, the label and/or object are authentic.
Preferably, both the marking system and the reader have a secure memory for the algorithm(s), which is lost in event of physical tampering with the devices. Further, the devices preferably have a failsafe mode that erases the algorithm(s) in case of significant unrecoverable errors. Finally, the systems preferably include safeguards against trivial marking or continuous interrogation, while allowing high throughput or marking and checking of objects and labels.
Since the algorithm memory within the reader may be fragile, a central database or server may be provided to reprogram the unit in case of data loss, after the cause of loss is investigated. Any such transmission is preferably over secure channels, for example 128-bit encryption or so-called secure socket layer (SSL) through a TCP/IP communication protocol. Each reader and marking system preferably has a unique identification number and set of encryption keys for any communication with the central system, and a marking placed on the label indicative of the marking conditions, for example marking system ID, date, location, marking serial number, and the like.
Labels can be affixed to any number of consumer and high security application including, for example, CDs/software, designer clothes, wine, cosmetics, seals, video tapes, floppy disks, perfume, electronics, currency, cassettes, books, records, documents, and financial instruments.
The detailed preferred embodiments of the invention will now be described with respect to the drawings. Like features of the drawings are indicated with the same reference numerals.
In
In
The drive then, based on the code, seeks “defects” in the disk, at locations defined by the code. 145. The code, therefore, may include track and sector information for a set of defects, which may be limited in number to 5-16 defects. Preferably, the absolute number of defects on any disk is not intentionally made higher than that necessary for authentication.
Using the disk read circuitry, the location of the expected defects is correlated with the existence of actual defects, to authenticate the disk 146. If defects are not found at the expected locations, or there are an insufficient number of identified defects, the disk authentication 146 fails.
Since the locations of the defects are encoded, it is possible to correct the output for the existence of the defects by filtering 147. The authentication process is then complete 148, and an authenticated disk may be played normally.
At the start 149, the disk is loaded into the drive 150. On the top (non-data reading) surface of the disk, a custom code is imprinted. This code is read 151, for example by a one or more light emitting diode-photodiode pair. This code is, for example a bar code disposed circumferentially about a portion of the disk. A non-deterministic pattern is read 152 from the disk, which may be formed as a pattern of ink reflection, a pattern of fibers or ink spots, or the like, in line with the optical read path of the sensor. This optical sensor is not presently provided in known disk drives.
The correspondence of the non-deterministic pattern and the read code is then verified 153.
The dye spectral characteristics or dichroism of the non-deterministic elements are also verified 154 by optical techniques.
Optionally, an on-line authentication procedure 155 may be employed, for example to verify a detailed pattern of fibers on the disk.
If the non-deterministic pattern and physical attributes (dye and/or dichroism) correspond to an authentic disk signature, then the disk is authenticated 156, and the disk may be used normally at the end of the process 157. Otherwise, firmware within the drive may be employed to prevent normal usage.
There have thus been shown and described novel receptacles and novel aspects of anti-counterfeit systems, which fulfill all the objects and advantages sought therefore. Many changes, modifications, variations, combinations, sub-combinations and other uses and applications of the subject invention will, however, become apparent to those skilled in the art after considering this specification and the accompanying drawings which disclose the preferred embodiments thereof. All such changes, modifications, variations and other uses and applications which do not depart from the spirit and scope of the invention are deemed to be covered by the invention, which is to be limited only by the claims which follow.
The present application is Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/744,606, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,251,634, issued Feb. 2, 2016, which is a Division of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/537,084, filed Nov. 10, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,064,260, issued Jun. 23, 2015, which is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/459,369, filed Apr. 30, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,886,946, issued Nov. 11, 2014, which is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/655,625, filed Sep. 4, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,171,567, issued May 1, 2012, which claims benefit of priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application 60/408,511, filed Sep. 4, 2002, each of which is expressly incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1686585 | Vemam et al. | Oct 1928 | A |
| 1938543 | Sanbum et al. | Dec 1933 | A |
| 2021141 | Boyer et al. | Nov 1935 | A |
| 2208653 | William et al. | Jul 1940 | A |
| 2379443 | Kantrowitz et al. | Jul 1945 | A |
| 2570920 | Clough et al. | Oct 1951 | A |
| 2669998 | Buchholz et al. | Feb 1954 | A |
| 2750949 | Kulo et al. | Jun 1956 | A |
| 2835260 | Richard et al. | May 1958 | A |
| 2865561 | Rosapepe | Dec 1958 | A |
| 2936684 | Simjian et al. | May 1960 | A |
| 3104314 | Simjian et al. | Sep 1963 | A |
| 3132654 | Adams et al. | May 1964 | A |
| 3148932 | Simjian et al. | Sep 1964 | A |
| 3150912 | Simjian et al. | Sep 1964 | A |
| 3173742 | Simjian et al. | Mar 1965 | A |
| 3222057 | Couri et al. | Dec 1965 | A |
| 3245534 | Smith et al. | Apr 1966 | A |
| 3246295 | De et al. | Apr 1966 | A |
| 3280974 | Riddle et al. | Oct 1966 | A |
| 3304080 | Greenblott et al. | Feb 1967 | A |
| 3376970 | Roseberg et al. | Apr 1968 | A |
| 3391479 | Buzzell et al. | Jul 1968 | A |
| 3443107 | Modglin et al. | May 1969 | A |
| 3480785 | Aufderheide et al. | Nov 1969 | A |
| 3496370 | Haville et al. | Feb 1970 | A |
| 3509535 | Berube et al. | Apr 1970 | A |
| 3612835 | Andrews et al. | Oct 1971 | A |
| 3618765 | Cooper et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
| 3636318 | Lindstrom et al. | Jan 1972 | A |
| 3656615 | Ptacek | Apr 1972 | A |
| 3679314 | Mustert | Jul 1972 | A |
| 3701165 | Huddleston | Oct 1972 | A |
| 3715031 | Okkonen | Feb 1973 | A |
| 3725667 | Schwartz | Apr 1973 | A |
| 3759382 | Walkley et al. | Sep 1973 | A |
| 3764899 | Peterson et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
| 3771583 | Bottemiller | Nov 1973 | A |
| 3778595 | Hatanaka et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
| 3778628 | Novak et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
| 3781109 | Mayer, Jr. et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
| 3782543 | Martelli et al. | Jan 1974 | A |
| 3798603 | Wahlberg | Mar 1974 | A |
| 3800078 | Cochran et al. | Mar 1974 | A |
| 3806710 | Shigemori et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
| 3815021 | Kerr | Jun 1974 | A |
| 3839637 | Willis | Oct 1974 | A |
| 3842281 | Goodrich | Oct 1974 | A |
| 3870629 | Carter et al. | Mar 1975 | A |
| 3876864 | Clark et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
| 3877019 | Auerbach et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
| 3880706 | Williams | Apr 1975 | A |
| 3906449 | Marchak | Sep 1975 | A |
| 3916922 | Prumm | Nov 1975 | A |
| 3930582 | Gartner et al. | Jan 1976 | A |
| 3932272 | Carnes, Jr. et al. | Jan 1976 | A |
| 3942154 | Akami et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
| 3949363 | Holm | Apr 1976 | A |
| 3962539 | Ehrsam et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
| 3966047 | Steiner | Jun 1976 | A |
| 3976198 | Carnes, Jr. et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
| 3984094 | Stocker | Oct 1976 | A |
| 3998237 | Kressin et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
| 3998379 | Myers et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
| 4023011 | Nakajima et al. | May 1977 | A |
| 4025420 | Horino | May 1977 | A |
| 4027142 | Paup et al. | May 1977 | A |
| 4040010 | Crane et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
| 4041456 | Ott et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
| 4050218 | Call | Sep 1977 | A |
| 4059122 | Kinoshita | Nov 1977 | A |
| 4059471 | Haigh | Nov 1977 | A |
| 4075460 | Gorgens | Feb 1978 | A |
| 4081131 | Sand et al. | Mar 1978 | A |
| 4096991 | Iguchi | Jun 1978 | A |
| 4106849 | Stieff | Aug 1978 | A |
| 4109238 | Creekmore | Aug 1978 | A |
| 4114027 | Slater et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
| 4114032 | Brosow et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
| 4114804 | Jones et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
| RE29796 | Yamamoto et al. | Oct 1978 | E |
| 4121003 | Williams | Oct 1978 | A |
| 4124111 | Hayashi | Nov 1978 | A |
| 4147430 | Gorgone et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
| 4150740 | Douno | Apr 1979 | A |
| 4150781 | Silverman et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
| 4157784 | Grottrup et al. | Jun 1979 | A |
| 4164770 | Jeffers | Aug 1979 | A |
| 4166945 | Inoyama et al. | Sep 1979 | A |
| 4167458 | Louzos et al. | Sep 1979 | A |
| 4172462 | Uchida et al. | Oct 1979 | A |
| 4178404 | Allen et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
| 4179212 | Lahr | Dec 1979 | A |
| 4179685 | O'Maley | Dec 1979 | A |
| 4179723 | Spencer | Dec 1979 | A |
| 4180798 | Komori et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
| 4184366 | Butler | Jan 1980 | A |
| 4186943 | Lee | Feb 1980 | A |
| 4187463 | Kivenson | Feb 1980 | A |
| 4187498 | Creekmore | Feb 1980 | A |
| 4197986 | Nagata | Apr 1980 | A |
| 4199615 | Wacks et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
| 4200770 | Hellman et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
| 4201978 | Nally | May 1980 | A |
| 4205780 | Burns et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
| 4208549 | Polillo et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
| 4218674 | Brosow et al. | Aug 1980 | A |
| 4228812 | Marti | Oct 1980 | A |
| 4231014 | Ponzio | Oct 1980 | A |
| 4231561 | Kaneko et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
| 4232295 | McConnell | Nov 1980 | A |
| 4234003 | Ristvedt et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
| 4237378 | Jones | Dec 1980 | A |
| 4247318 | Lee et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
| 4249552 | Margolin et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
| 4250806 | Boyson et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
| 4251867 | Uchida et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
| 4255651 | Phillips | Mar 1981 | A |
| 4262284 | Stieff et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
| 4264808 | Owens et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
| 4266121 | Hirose | May 1981 | A |
| 4275874 | DiBlasio | Jun 1981 | A |
| 4277774 | Fujii et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
| 4283708 | Lee | Aug 1981 | A |
| 4286703 | Schuller et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
| 4288781 | Sellner et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
| RE30773 | Glaser et al. | Oct 1981 | E |
| 4302781 | Ikeda et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
| 4310885 | Azcua et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
| 4311914 | Huber | Jan 1982 | A |
| 4313598 | DiBlasio | Feb 1982 | A |
| 4317957 | Sendrow | Mar 1982 | A |
| 4321612 | Murata et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
| 4321672 | Braun et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
| 4326636 | Kawakami | Apr 1982 | A |
| 4332348 | Nordin | Jun 1982 | A |
| 4334619 | Horino et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
| 4337864 | McLean | Jul 1982 | A |
| 4341951 | Benton | Jul 1982 | A |
| 4348656 | Gorgone et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
| 4349111 | Shah et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
| 4352988 | Ishida | Oct 1982 | A |
| 4355300 | Weber | Oct 1982 | A |
| 4355369 | Garvin | Oct 1982 | A |
| 4356473 | Freudenthal | Oct 1982 | A |
| 4357528 | Smith et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
| 4360034 | Davila et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
| 4365700 | Arimoto et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
| 4369442 | Werth et al. | Jan 1983 | A |
| 4376364 | Horino et al. | Mar 1983 | A |
| 4380316 | Glinka et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
| 4381447 | Horvath et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
| 4383540 | De Meyer et al. | May 1983 | A |
| 4385285 | Horst et al. | May 1983 | A |
| 4386432 | Nakamura et al. | May 1983 | A |
| 4388662 | Jeffers et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
| 4389063 | Ryan | Jun 1983 | A |
| 4396902 | Warthan et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
| 4397142 | Bingham | Aug 1983 | A |
| 4398088 | Hirose et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
| 4405829 | Rivest et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
| 4412292 | Sedam et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
| 4413296 | Jeffers | Nov 1983 | A |
| 4416299 | Bergman | Nov 1983 | A |
| 4417136 | Rushby et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
| 4420153 | Winkler et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
| 4423316 | Sano et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
| 4423415 | Goldman | Dec 1983 | A |
| 4429991 | Williams | Feb 1984 | A |
| 4434010 | Ash | Feb 1984 | A |
| 4434359 | Watanabe | Feb 1984 | A |
| 4435834 | Pauli et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
| 4436103 | Dick | Mar 1984 | A |
| 4437935 | Crane, Jr. | Mar 1984 | A |
| 4441205 | Berkin et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
| 4442541 | Finkel et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
| 4445039 | Yew | Apr 1984 | A |
| 4449240 | Yoshida | May 1984 | A |
| 4454414 | Benton | Jun 1984 | A |
| 4458816 | Horino et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
| 4461028 | Okubo | Jul 1984 | A |
| 4462509 | Adelberger | Jul 1984 | A |
| 4463250 | McNeight et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
| 4464786 | Nishito et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
| 4464787 | Fish et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
| 4465192 | Ohba et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
| 4470496 | Steiner | Sep 1984 | A |
| 4470590 | Ariga et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
| RE31692 | Tyburski et al. | Oct 1984 | E |
| 4474197 | Kinoshita et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
| 4479049 | Hirose | Oct 1984 | A |
| 4480177 | Allen | Oct 1984 | A |
| 4482058 | Steiner | Nov 1984 | A |
| 4487306 | Nao et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
| 4488116 | Plesko | Dec 1984 | A |
| 4490846 | Ishida et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
| 4501418 | Ariga et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
| 4503963 | Steiner | Mar 1985 | A |
| 4507349 | Fromson et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
| 4507744 | McFiggans et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
| 4513056 | Vernois et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
| 4513439 | Gorgone et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
| 4514085 | Kaye | Apr 1985 | A |
| 4521008 | Granzow et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
| 4523330 | Cain | Jun 1985 | A |
| 4525748 | Carbone | Jun 1985 | A |
| 4527383 | Bingham | Jul 1985 | A |
| 4530067 | Dorr | Jul 1985 | A |
| 4531531 | Johnson et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
| 4532641 | Nishimura | Jul 1985 | A |
| 4537504 | Baltes et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
| 4538719 | Gray et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
| 4539702 | Oka | Sep 1985 | A |
| 4542287 | Watanabe | Sep 1985 | A |
| 4542829 | Emery et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
| 4543969 | Rasmussen | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4544266 | Antes | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4547896 | Ohtombe et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4549561 | Johnson et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4552617 | Crane | Nov 1985 | A |
| 4553222 | Kurland et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
| 4553846 | Hilton et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
| 4556140 | Okada | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4557597 | Iwama | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4558224 | Gober | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4558711 | Ituka et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4559451 | Curl | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4559452 | Igaki et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4563771 | Gorgone et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
| 4564036 | Ristvedt | Jan 1986 | A |
| 4567370 | Falls | Jan 1986 | A |
| 4568936 | Goldman | Feb 1986 | A |
| 4569421 | Sandstedt | Feb 1986 | A |
| 4570655 | Raterman | Feb 1986 | A |
| 4582172 | Takeuchi et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4582986 | Stockburger et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4584529 | Aoyama | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4585928 | Watanabe | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4587412 | Apisdorf | May 1986 | A |
| 4587434 | Roes et al. | May 1986 | A |
| 4590606 | Rohrer | May 1986 | A |
| 4592090 | Curl et al. | May 1986 | A |
| 4593184 | Bryce et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
| 4594664 | Hashimoto | Jun 1986 | A |
| 4599509 | Silverman et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
| 4602149 | Tateisi et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
| 4602332 | Hirose et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
| D285095 | Lundgren et al. | Aug 1986 | S |
| 4605926 | Onishi et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
| 4606927 | Jones | Aug 1986 | A |
| 4607649 | Taipale et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
| 4611205 | Eglise | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4611345 | Ohnishi et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4617457 | Granzow et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
| 4617458 | Bryce | Oct 1986 | A |
| 4620559 | Childers et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
| 4622456 | Naruto et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
| 4623579 | Quon | Nov 1986 | A |
| 4623975 | Kagami | Nov 1986 | A |
| 4625870 | Nao et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4628194 | Dobbins et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4629382 | Ueshin | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4630201 | White | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4630813 | Watanabe et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4632252 | Haruki et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4637051 | Clark | Jan 1987 | A |
| 4638988 | Kershaw | Jan 1987 | A |
| 4641239 | Takesako | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4645936 | Gorgone | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4652015 | Crane | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4653647 | Hashimoto | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4658289 | Nagano et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4674260 | Rasmussen et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4676343 | Humble et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4677682 | Miyagawa et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4678072 | Kobayashi et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4680803 | Dilella | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4681128 | Ristvedt et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4681229 | Uesaka et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4682794 | Margolin | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4683508 | Jeffers et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4685141 | Hoque et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
| 4686357 | Douno et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
| 4690268 | Ueshin | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4694963 | Takesako | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4697071 | Hiraoka et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4700368 | Munn et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
| 4704356 | Thonar | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4705154 | Masho et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4706577 | Jones | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4707843 | McDonald et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4712705 | Fuehrer | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4716456 | Hosaka | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4718218 | Ristvedt | Jan 1988 | A |
| 4731043 | Ristvedt et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4733308 | Nakamura et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4733765 | Watanabe | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4735289 | Kenyon | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4738473 | Meloni et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4738901 | Finkel et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4739156 | Watanabe | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4743743 | Fukatsu | May 1988 | A |
| 4743974 | Lockwood | May 1988 | A |
| 4747492 | Saito et al. | May 1988 | A |
| 4748316 | Dickson | May 1988 | A |
| 4748679 | Gold et al. | May 1988 | A |
| 4749074 | Ueki et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4749087 | Buttifant | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4753624 | Adams et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4753625 | Okada | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4754487 | Newmuis | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4756557 | Kaule et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4760239 | Makin | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4764725 | Bryce | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4764976 | Kallin et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4765464 | Ristvedt | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4766548 | Cedrone et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4767205 | Schwartz et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4768100 | Kunishima et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4774663 | Musmanno et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
| 4775353 | Childers et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4775354 | Rasmussen et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4778983 | Ushikubo | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4779898 | Berning et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4782328 | Denlinger | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4784274 | Mori et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4785290 | Goldman | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4787518 | Yuge et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4791669 | Kage | Dec 1988 | A |
| 4797921 | Shiraishi | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4803347 | Sugahara et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4804830 | Miyagisima et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4804998 | Miyawaki | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4806709 | Evans | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4807736 | Kondo et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4811004 | Person et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4812629 | O'Neil et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4812965 | Taylor | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4814589 | Storch et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4816655 | Musyck et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4817176 | Marshall et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4820909 | Kawauchi et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4820912 | Samyn | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4821332 | Durham | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4823393 | Kawakami | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4825246 | Fukuchi et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4825801 | Weber | May 1989 | A |
| 4827531 | Milford | May 1989 | A |
| 4834230 | Kondo et al. | May 1989 | A |
| 4837840 | Goldman | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4837842 | Holt | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4838648 | Phillips et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4839505 | Bradt et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4841358 | Kammoto et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4843219 | Franchi | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4844369 | Kanayachi | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4844446 | Thie et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4848556 | Shah et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4851616 | Wales et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4853961 | Pastor | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4863414 | Ristvedt et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4864618 | Wright et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4868877 | Fischer | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4875670 | Petersen et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4877230 | Winkler et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4879747 | Leighton et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4880096 | Kobayashi et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4881268 | Uchida et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4882764 | Reynolds et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4883158 | Kobayashi et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4883181 | Yoshikawa | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4884212 | Stutsman | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4888812 | Dinan et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4893338 | Pastor | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4900909 | Nagashima et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4903953 | Winkler et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4905839 | Yuge et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4905840 | Yuge et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4906988 | Copella | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4908516 | West | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4913858 | Miekka et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4917371 | Bastow et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4920385 | Clarke et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4921463 | Primdahl et al. | May 1990 | A |
| 4922109 | Bercovitz et al. | May 1990 | A |
| 4928094 | Smith | May 1990 | A |
| 4929821 | Kocznar et al. | May 1990 | A |
| 4930866 | Berning et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4931782 | Jackson | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4936435 | Griner | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4947441 | Hara et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4948174 | Thomson et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4953086 | Fukatsu | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4954697 | Kokubun et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4958235 | Sims et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4960981 | Benton et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
| 4964495 | Rasmussen | Oct 1990 | A |
| 4966570 | Ristvedt et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
| 4970655 | Winn et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
| 4971187 | Furuya et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
| 4972475 | Sant'Anselmo | Nov 1990 | A |
| 4973851 | Lee | Nov 1990 | A |
| 4980543 | Hara et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
| 4981370 | Dziewit et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
| 4982437 | Loriot | Jan 1991 | A |
| 4984280 | Abe | Jan 1991 | A |
| 4984692 | Obara | Jan 1991 | A |
| 4985614 | Pease et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
| 4988849 | Sasaki et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
| 4992647 | Konishi et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
| 4992860 | Hamaguchi et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
| 4995081 | Leighton et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
| 4995082 | Schnorr | Feb 1991 | A |
| 4995848 | Goh | Feb 1991 | A |
| 4996604 | Ogawa et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5001766 | Baird | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5003596 | Wood | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5009627 | Rasmussen | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5010238 | Kadono et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5010485 | Bigari | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5011455 | Rasmussen | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5012932 | Omura et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5018767 | Wicker | May 1991 | A |
| 5020787 | Arikawa | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5022531 | Horino et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5022889 | Ristvedt et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5023782 | Lutz et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5025139 | Halliburton, Jr. | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5025483 | Dinan et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5026320 | Rasmussen | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5027415 | Hara et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5028290 | Curiel | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5031098 | Miller et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5033602 | Saarinen et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5039847 | Morii et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5039848 | Stoken | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5040226 | Elischer et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5047871 | Meyer et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5053607 | Carlson et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5054066 | Riek et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5054621 | Murphy et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5055086 | Raterman et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5055657 | Miller et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5055834 | Chiba | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5058164 | Elmer et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5059245 | Phillips et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5059776 | Antes | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5060065 | Wasserman | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5063599 | Concannon et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5064999 | Okamoto et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5068519 | Bryce | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5073935 | Pastor | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5075862 | Doeberl et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5076441 | Gerlier | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5080633 | Ristvedt et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5081675 | Kittirutsunetorn | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5089712 | Holland | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5091713 | Horne et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5091961 | Baus, Jr. | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5097517 | Holt | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5103479 | Takaragi et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5103982 | Walter et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5104353 | Ristvedt et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5105364 | Kawamura et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5105601 | Horiguchi et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5106338 | Rasmussen et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5111927 | Schulze, Jr. | May 1992 | A |
| 5113445 | Wang | May 1992 | A |
| 5114381 | Ueda et al. | May 1992 | A |
| 5118526 | Allen et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5119025 | Smith et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5119433 | Will | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5120126 | Wertz et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5120944 | Kern et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5120945 | Nishibe et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5122754 | Gotaas | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5123873 | Rasmussen | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5129205 | Rasmussen | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5131039 | Chaum | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5133601 | Cohen et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5134663 | Kozlowski | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5135115 | Miller et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5135435 | Rasmussen | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5135812 | Phillips et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5140517 | Nagata et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5141443 | Rasmussen et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5141472 | Todd et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5142577 | Pastor | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5142578 | Matyas et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5144115 | Yoshida | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5145455 | Todd | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5146067 | Sloan et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5146512 | Weideman et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5151607 | Crane et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5154272 | Nishiumi et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5159548 | Caslavka | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5163091 | Graziano et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5163672 | Mennie | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5163866 | Rasmussen | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5163867 | Rasmussen | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5163868 | Adams et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5166978 | Quisquater | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5167313 | Dobbins et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5167314 | Levasseur | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5169188 | Kupperman et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5171363 | Phillips et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5172907 | Kalisiak | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5174454 | Parkander | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5175416 | Mansvelt et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5176565 | Ristvedt et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5179517 | Sarbin et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5183142 | Latchinian et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5184115 | Black et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5184709 | Nishiumi et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5186334 | Fukudome et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5187750 | Behera | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5191525 | LeBrun et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5191613 | Graziano et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5193121 | Elischer et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5193853 | Wicker | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5194037 | Jones et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5194918 | Kino et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5197919 | Geib et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5198976 | Form et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5199543 | Kamagami et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5201395 | Takizawa et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5204811 | Bednar et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5205780 | Rasmussen | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5206915 | Kern et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5207784 | Schwartzendruber | May 1993 | A |
| 5207788 | Geib et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5209696 | Rasmussen et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5214530 | Coombs et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5216915 | Sakamoto | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5220395 | Yamashita et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5220501 | Lawlor et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5227487 | Haugland et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5227617 | Christopher et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5231381 | Duwaer | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5231668 | Kravitz | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5232216 | Bybee | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5236071 | Lee | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5236072 | Cargill | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5237158 | Kern et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5237159 | Stephens et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5239593 | Wittner et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5240116 | Stevens et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5243174 | Veeneman et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5243405 | Tichenor et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5243641 | Evans et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5247159 | Yuge et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
| 5251273 | Betts et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5251738 | Dabrowski | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5252811 | Henochowicz et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5253167 | Yoshida et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5258605 | Metlitsky et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5258855 | Lech et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5261518 | Bryce | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5263085 | Shamir | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5263566 | Nara et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5265008 | Benton et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5265874 | Dickinson et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5268561 | Kimura et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5272641 | Ford et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5274641 | Shobatake et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5276736 | Chaum | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5277292 | Boxall | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5277651 | Rasmussen et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5279403 | Harbaugh et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5282127 | Mii | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5283366 | Huthmacher et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5283422 | Storch et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5285382 | Muehlberger et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5286226 | Rasmussen | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5286954 | Sato et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5289547 | Ligas et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5290033 | Bittner et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5291003 | Avnet et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5291560 | Daugman | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5292008 | Sansone et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5293033 | Yamashita | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5293981 | Abe et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5295196 | Raterman et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5297030 | Vassigh et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5297598 | Rasmussen | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5297986 | Ristvedt et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5299977 | Mazur et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5304813 | De Man | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5306899 | Marom et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5307423 | Gupta et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5308992 | Crane et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5309515 | Troung et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5315112 | Harris | May 1994 | A |
| 5316279 | Corona et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5317140 | Dunthorn | May 1994 | A |
| 5321238 | Kamata et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5324922 | Roberts | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5325167 | Melen | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5326104 | Pease et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5329102 | Sansone | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5335292 | Lovelady et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5335484 | Hain | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5337361 | Wang et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5337362 | Gormish et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5338066 | Gundjian | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5340971 | Rockstein et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5341408 | Melcher et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5342165 | Graef et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5351302 | Leighton et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5354097 | Tel | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5354723 | Gundjian | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5358088 | Barnes et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5363949 | Matsubayashi | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5365586 | Indeck et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5367148 | Storch et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5367319 | Graham | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5367577 | Gotaas | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5368147 | Menke et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5370575 | Geib et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5370763 | Curiel | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5371345 | LeStrange et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5371798 | McWhortor | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5372542 | Geib et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5373550 | Campbell et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5374814 | Kako et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5375170 | Shamir | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5379344 | Larsson et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5379875 | Shames et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5380047 | Molee et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5381019 | Sato | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5382191 | Rasmussen | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5383754 | Sumida et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5384717 | Ebenstein | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5384846 | Berson et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5388158 | Berson | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5390776 | Thompson | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5393099 | D'Amato | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5394469 | Nagel et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5394969 | Harbaugh | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5394992 | Winkler | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5396559 | McGrew | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5397003 | Stevens et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5399874 | Gonsalves et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5401211 | Geib et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5402895 | Mikkelsen et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5404986 | Hossfield et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5408417 | Wilder | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5410414 | Curry | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5410590 | Blood et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| RE34934 | Raterman et al. | May 1995 | E |
| 5412190 | Josephson et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5412718 | Narasimhalu et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5416307 | Danek et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5417316 | Harbaugh | May 1995 | A |
| 5418458 | Jeffers | May 1995 | A |
| 5418855 | Liang et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5419424 | Harbaugh | May 1995 | A |
| 5419440 | Picoult | May 1995 | A |
| 5420406 | Izawa et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5420924 | Berson et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5421443 | Hatamachi et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5422467 | Graef et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5422954 | Berson | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5425669 | Geib et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5426700 | Berson | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5429550 | Mazur et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5430664 | Cargill et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5434427 | Crane et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5437357 | Ota et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5438184 | Roberts et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5440108 | Tran et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5442045 | Haugland et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5442162 | Armel | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5444793 | Kelland | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5444794 | Uhland, Sr. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5445277 | Takemoto et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5450938 | Rademacher | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5451759 | Hoshino et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5453047 | Mazur et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5453601 | Rosen | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5453605 | Hecht et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5453840 | Parker et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5459304 | Eisenmann | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5464690 | Boswell | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5465301 | Jotcham et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5465821 | Akioka | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5467405 | Raterman et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5467406 | Graves et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5468182 | Geib | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5468941 | Sasaki | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5468971 | Ebstein et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5469241 | Takahashi et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5470079 | LeStrange et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5471039 | Irwin, Jr. et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5474495 | Geib et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5474497 | Jones et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5475694 | Ivanov et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5476169 | Takarada et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5478992 | Hamada et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5480348 | Mazur et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5481377 | Udagawa et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5485312 | Horner et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5488661 | Matsui | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5488671 | Kern | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5489237 | Geib et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5491325 | Huang et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5499924 | Arisaka et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5500514 | Veeneman et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5501631 | Mennie et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5504822 | Holt | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5506691 | Bednar et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5507379 | Mazur et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5509692 | Oz | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5510199 | Martin | Apr 1996 | A |
| D369984 | Larsen | May 1996 | S |
| 5514034 | Jones et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5520577 | Rasmussen | May 1996 | A |
| 5521984 | Denenberg et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5523575 | Machida et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5530772 | Storey | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5530773 | Thompson | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5532464 | Josephson et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5537486 | Stratigos et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5538468 | Ristvedt et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5539825 | Akiyama et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5539840 | Krtolica et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5542880 | Geib et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5542881 | Geib | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5544043 | Miki et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5544086 | Davis et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5545885 | Jagielinski | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5546462 | Indeck et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5548110 | Storch et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5549953 | Li | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5553320 | Matsuura et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5559887 | Davis et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5564546 | Molbak et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5564974 | Mazur et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5564978 | Jones et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5570465 | Tsakanikas | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5573457 | Watts et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5574790 | Liang et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5576825 | Nakajima et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5580950 | Harris et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5581257 | Greene et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5584758 | Geib | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5586036 | Pintsov | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5590196 | Moreau | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5591527 | Lu | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5592377 | Lipkin | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5592549 | Nagel et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5592561 | Moore | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5594225 | Botvin | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5600704 | Ahlberg et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5600725 | Rueppel et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5600732 | Ott et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5601683 | Martin | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5601931 | Hoshino et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5602381 | Hoshino et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5602933 | Blackwell et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5602936 | Green et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5604804 | Micali | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5606609 | Houser et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5607040 | Mathurin, Sr. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5615280 | Izawa et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5616902 | Cooley et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5616915 | Simpkins et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5620079 | Molbak | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5623547 | Jones et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5625562 | Veeneman et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5625689 | Indeck et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5630494 | Strauts | May 1997 | A |
| 5633949 | Graves et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5637854 | Thomas | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5639081 | Hatamachi et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5640463 | Csulits | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5641050 | Smith et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5647010 | Okubo et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5650605 | Morioka et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5650761 | Gomm et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5652421 | Veeneman et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5652802 | Graves et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5657846 | Schwartz | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5665952 | Ziarno | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5666417 | Liang et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5671282 | Wolff et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5673338 | Denenberg et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5678046 | Cahill et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5679070 | Ishida et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5680463 | Windel et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5680472 | Conant | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5684597 | Hossfield et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5687002 | Itoh | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5687963 | Mennie | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5692067 | Raterman et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5692742 | Tranquilla | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5696366 | Ziarno | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5696604 | Curry | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5703344 | Bezy et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5704491 | Graves | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5706099 | Curry | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5708810 | Kern et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5710636 | Curry | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5719939 | Tel | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5719948 | Liang | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5724438 | Graves | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5727667 | Nye | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5729623 | Omatu et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5734752 | Knox | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5740244 | Indeck et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5743373 | Strauts | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5745574 | Muftic | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5746299 | Molbak et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5751840 | Raterman et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5751842 | Riach et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5752152 | Gasper et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5754673 | Brooks et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5754674 | Ott et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5755437 | Ek | May 1998 | A |
| 5760386 | Ward | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5761089 | McInerny | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5767988 | Dobbs et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5768416 | Lech et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5774874 | Veeneman et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5777314 | Roustaei | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5781654 | Carney | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5781708 | Austin et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5782686 | Geib et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5784463 | Chen et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5790025 | Amer et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5790693 | Graves et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5790697 | Munro et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5790703 | Wang | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5799767 | Molbak | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5806650 | Mennie et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5813510 | Rademacher | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5815592 | Mennie et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5822448 | Graves et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5823315 | Hoffman et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5829742 | Rabindran et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5830054 | Petri | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5832104 | Graves et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5832460 | Bednar et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5832463 | Funk | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5838812 | Pare, Jr. et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5838814 | Moore | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5842188 | Ramsey et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5842916 | Gerrity et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5843564 | Gasper et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5848784 | Tranquilla | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5850076 | Morioka et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5852811 | Atkins | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5854581 | Mori et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5856266 | Gasper et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5860542 | Takamatsu | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5864742 | Gasper et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5865673 | Geib et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5867589 | Graves et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5870469 | Albert et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5870487 | Graves et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5870725 | Bellinger et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5874717 | Kern et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5875259 | Mennie et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5880444 | Shibata et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5886798 | Staub et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5892211 | Davis et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5892827 | Beach et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5894937 | Schmidt | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5901229 | Fujisaki et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5903340 | Lawandy et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5903721 | Sixtus | May 1999 | A |
| 5905810 | Jones et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5909502 | Mazur | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5909503 | Graves et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5909793 | Beach et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5909794 | Molbak et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5912451 | Gurevich et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5912974 | Holloway et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5912979 | Gavrilos | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5912982 | Munro et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5913399 | Takemoto et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5913543 | Curiel | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5914930 | Sasaki et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5915018 | Aucsmith | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5915024 | Kitaori et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5915685 | Bausch et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5917930 | Kayani et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5918748 | Clark et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5919730 | Gasper et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5923413 | Laskowski | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5926392 | York et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5926550 | Davis | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5926551 | Dwork et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5928471 | Howland et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5930778 | Geer | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5932119 | Kaplan et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5933829 | Durst et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5936219 | Yoshida et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5938044 | Weggesser | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5940623 | Watts et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5940844 | Cahill et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5942255 | Klesges | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5942743 | Schmidt et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5943655 | Jacobson | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5944600 | Zimmermann | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5946103 | Curry | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5947255 | Shimada et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5948136 | Smyers | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5949042 | Dietz, II et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5951476 | Beach | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5953426 | Windel et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5956409 | Chan et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5957262 | Molbak et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5959296 | Cyr et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5960103 | Graves et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5966205 | Jung et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5966456 | Jones et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5974150 | Kaish et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5982918 | Mennie et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5984366 | Priddy | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5988348 | Martin et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5988500 | Litman | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5991399 | Graunke et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5992601 | Mennie et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5993132 | Harres et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5995638 | Amidror et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5995949 | Morioka et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5997395 | Geib et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6001516 | Gasper | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6002772 | Saito | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6005960 | Moore | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6006328 | Drake | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6009174 | Tatebayashi et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6011905 | Huttenlocher et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6012048 | Gustin et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6012565 | Mazur | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6012832 | Saunders et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6014453 | Sonoda et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6017270 | Ristvedt et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6019872 | Kurrle | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6021202 | Anderson et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6021883 | Casanova et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6023684 | Pearson | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6023688 | Ramachandran et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6026167 | Aziz | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6026175 | Munro et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6028936 | Hillis | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6028937 | Tatebayashi et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6028951 | Raterman et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6029150 | Kravitz | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6030655 | Hansmire et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| D422016 | Forslund | Mar 2000 | S |
| 6032859 | Muehlberger et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6035914 | Ramsey et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6036232 | Kaule et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6036344 | Goldenberg | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6038016 | Jung et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6038553 | Hyde, Jr. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6039357 | Kendrick | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6039644 | Geib et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6039645 | Mazur | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6041317 | Brookner | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6041704 | Pauschinger | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6042470 | Geib et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6044463 | Kanda et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6044952 | Haggerty et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6045039 | Stinson et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6045656 | Foster et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6045881 | Gasper et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6047807 | Molbak | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6047808 | Neubarth et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6048269 | Burns et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6049787 | Takahashi et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6052780 | Glover | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6053406 | Litman | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6054021 | Kurrle et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6055327 | Aragon | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6056104 | Neubarth et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6058384 | Pierce et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6059185 | Funk et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6065119 | Sandford, II et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6065672 | Haycock | May 2000 | A |
| 6068194 | Mazur | May 2000 | A |
| 6072896 | Graves et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6073744 | Raterman et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6074334 | Mennie et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6076738 | Bloomberg et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6076826 | Gerlier et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6078683 | Denison et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6080056 | Karlsson | Jun 2000 | A |
| D427623 | Kuwada et al. | Jul 2000 | S |
| 6082519 | Martin et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6086471 | Zimmermann | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6095313 | Molbak et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6097834 | Krouse et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6101266 | Laskowski et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6105007 | Norris | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6109522 | Force et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6112982 | Ahlquist et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6116402 | Beach et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6119946 | Teicher | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6128402 | Jones et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6131625 | Casanova et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6131718 | Witschorik | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6135355 | Han et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6139418 | Geib et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6141119 | Tseng et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6141438 | Blanchester | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6142285 | Panzeri et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6144459 | Satou | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6145738 | Stinson et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6154879 | Pare, Jr. et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6159869 | Datri et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6168001 | Davis | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6170744 | Lee et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6171182 | Geib et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6174230 | Gerrity et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6181837 | Cahill et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6182892 | Angelo et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6193156 | Han et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6196371 | Martin et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6196913 | Geib et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6198545 | Ostromoukhov et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6212504 | Hayosh | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6219794 | Soutar et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6220419 | Mennie | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6223166 | Kay | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6226619 | Halperin et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6230928 | Hanna et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6234294 | Defeo et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6237739 | Mazur et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6239397 | Rosenbaum et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6241069 | Mazur et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6244508 | Straub | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6246061 | Ramsey et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6252963 | Rhoads | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6252971 | Wang | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6256407 | Mennie et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6263086 | Wang | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6264101 | Ryan et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6264545 | Magee et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6264556 | Izawa et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6265907 | Sukegawa | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6273413 | Graef | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6278795 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6280797 | Kuczynski et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6282523 | Tedesco et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6283366 | Hills et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6304660 | Ehrhart et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6308887 | Korman et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6311819 | Stromme et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6314409 | Schneck et al. | Nov 2001 | B2 |
| 6318536 | Korman et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6318537 | Jones et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6321894 | Johnsson | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6328209 | O'Boyle | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6332099 | Heidel et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6332133 | Takayama | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6332663 | Puzio | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6336585 | Harada | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6343745 | Bohm et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6349972 | Geiger et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6351551 | Munro et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6351552 | Weaver et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6354491 | Nichols et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
| 6357656 | Puff | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6360001 | Berger et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6363164 | Jones et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6363362 | Burfield et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6365907 | Staub et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6371303 | Klein et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6373573 | Jung et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6373965 | Liang | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6378683 | Mennie | Apr 2002 | B2 |
| 6381354 | Mennie et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6388744 | Kubota et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6389151 | Carr et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6390269 | Billington et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6390368 | Edwards | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6398000 | Jenrick et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6412619 | Ito et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6412620 | Imura | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6415983 | Ulvr et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6425081 | Iwamura | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6430320 | Jia et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6431342 | Schwartz | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6438230 | Moore | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6438529 | Thiel | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6439395 | Voellmer et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6456928 | Johnson | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6459806 | Raterman et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6460705 | Hallowell | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6466329 | Mukai | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6471030 | Neubarth et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6473165 | Coombs et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6473519 | Pidhirny et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6474548 | Montross et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6484863 | Molbak | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6484884 | Gerrity et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6493461 | Mennie et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6494776 | Molbak | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6499277 | Warner et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6503138 | Spoehr et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
| 6510238 | Haycock | Jan 2003 | B2 |
| 6513118 | Iwamura | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6516078 | Yang et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6520308 | Martin et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6522772 | Morrison et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6529269 | Sugata | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6531230 | Weber et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6535618 | Rhoads | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6539104 | Raterman et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6540090 | Sakai et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6546351 | Haycock et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6547131 | Foodman et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6550671 | Brown et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6552781 | Rompel et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6554185 | Montross et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6557759 | Zolotarev et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6560355 | Graves et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6563129 | Knobel | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6565002 | Tel | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6573983 | Laskowski | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6574377 | Cahill et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6578735 | Mothwurf | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6579165 | Kuhlin et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6581042 | Pare, Jr. et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6584214 | Pappu et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6588569 | Jenrick et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6588672 | Usami | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6601687 | Jenrick et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6602125 | Martin | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6603580 | Taillie | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6603872 | Jones et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6603874 | Stern et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6605819 | Ross | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6609604 | Jones et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6611351 | Simonoff | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6611598 | Hayosh | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6612500 | Myer, Sr. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6612921 | Geib et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6621916 | Smith et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6621919 | Mennie et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6625295 | Wolfgang et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6628816 | Mennie et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6636624 | Raterman et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6637576 | Jones et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6640956 | Zwieg et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6644696 | Brown et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6647136 | Jones et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6650767 | Jones et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6654149 | Sheng | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6654486 | Jones et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6655585 | Shinn | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6659259 | Knox et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6659507 | Banahan | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6661910 | Jones et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6662166 | Pare, Jr. et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6663675 | Blake et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6665431 | Jones et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6666318 | Gerrity et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6668096 | Yamamoto | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6678401 | Jones et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6678402 | Jones et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6679775 | Luciano et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6697511 | Haycock | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6705470 | Klein et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6721442 | Mennie et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6722486 | Shibata et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6722699 | Patton et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6724926 | Jones et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6724927 | Jones et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6731409 | Wang | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6731785 | Mennie et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6731786 | Jones et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6741360 | D'Agraives et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6748101 | Jones et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6748410 | Gressel et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6754636 | Walker et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6755730 | Blake et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6758316 | Molbak | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6760472 | Takeda et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6761308 | Hanna et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6766892 | Martin et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6772342 | Hawthorne | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6775775 | Yoshiura et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6778693 | Munro et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6779720 | Lewis | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6783065 | Spitz et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6783452 | Hino et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6783785 | Raghavan et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6785405 | Tuttle et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6786398 | Stinson et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6798899 | Mennie et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6798900 | Sugata | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6810137 | Jones et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| RE38663 | Kayani et al. | Nov 2004 | E |
| 6813369 | Oki | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6823075 | Perry | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6834349 | Higurashi et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
| 6834794 | Dabrowski | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6843418 | Jones et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6848561 | Bao | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6850147 | Prokoski et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6853676 | Kim | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6854581 | Molbak | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6854640 | Peklo | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6860375 | Hallowell et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6863168 | Gerrity et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6863214 | Garner, IV et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6866134 | Stromme et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6868954 | Stromme et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6871789 | Hilton et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6880692 | Mazur et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
| 6882738 | Davis et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6883706 | Mastie et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6883707 | Nagasaka et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6885977 | Gavra et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6889325 | Sipman et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6891474 | Fletcher | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6892871 | Strauts et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6896118 | Jones et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6902111 | Han et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6910131 | Yamada et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
| 6913130 | Mazur et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
| 6913260 | Maier et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6915893 | Mennie | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6925192 | Honsinger et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6928546 | Nanavati et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
| 6928552 | Mischenko et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
| 6929109 | Klein et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
| 6940094 | Yamazaki et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6950094 | Gordon et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6950810 | Lapsley et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6952775 | Miura | Oct 2005 | B1 |
| 6953150 | Shepley et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6955141 | Santanam et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6955253 | Mazur et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
| 6955263 | Steinkogler et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6957733 | Mazur et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6957746 | Martin et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6959800 | Mazur et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
| 6961449 | Mil'shtein et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6962247 | Maier et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6966417 | Peklo et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6970573 | Carr et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6975404 | Schwarz | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6976570 | Molbak | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6977791 | Zhu et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6980684 | Munro et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
| 6986042 | Griffin | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6988250 | Proudler et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
| 6988606 | Geib et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6991530 | Hino et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6994200 | Jenrick et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 6996263 | Jones et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7000828 | Jones | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7002675 | MacGibbon et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7004831 | Hino et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7006256 | Wang et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7006664 | Paraskevakos | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7007303 | Goldberg et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7014029 | Winters | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7014108 | Sorenson et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7016767 | Jones et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7017729 | Gerrity et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7018286 | Blake et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7028188 | Moore | Apr 2006 | B1 |
| 7028827 | Molbak et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
| 7028888 | Laskowski | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7028896 | Goldstein et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7031555 | Troyanker | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7034324 | Voser | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7036651 | Tam et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7036721 | Dabrowski | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7044463 | Brotherston et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7051205 | Horiguchi et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7051206 | Giest et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7058202 | Amidror | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7069439 | Chen et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
| 7071481 | Nekrasov et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7072062 | Eguchi | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7076084 | Davis et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7077332 | Verschuur et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7080041 | Nagel | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7082216 | Jones et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7083036 | Adams | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7089420 | Durst et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7092560 | Jones et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7096204 | Chen et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7103206 | Graves et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7103438 | Hallowell et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7104449 | Han et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7110573 | Monk et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7111321 | Watts, Jr. et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
| 7113615 | Rhoads et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7113925 | Waserstein et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7113929 | Beach et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
| 7119662 | Horiguchi et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
| 7120608 | Gallagher et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
| 7124113 | Fairclough et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
| 7124443 | Ishibashi et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7126721 | Wang et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7131580 | Molbak | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7131593 | Steinkogler et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7133741 | Matzig et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7143949 | Hannigan | Dec 2006 | B1 |
| 7146245 | Jones et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7148999 | Xu et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7149336 | Jones et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7152047 | Nagel | Dec 2006 | B1 |
| 7152727 | Waechter | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7152744 | Kunz et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7155745 | Shin et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
| 7158662 | Chiles | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7159241 | Horiguchi et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
| 7162035 | Durst et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
| 7162637 | Wakao et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7164810 | Schnee et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7165179 | Maruyama et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7170391 | Lane et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7171032 | Jones et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7184133 | Coombs et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7187795 | Jones et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7188258 | Aggarwal et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
| 7188720 | Geib et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7191657 | Maier et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7194623 | Proudler et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
| 7194636 | Harrison | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7197173 | Jones et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7200255 | Jones et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7200682 | Miyazaki et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7200868 | Mattox et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7201320 | Csulits et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7201340 | Dietrich et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7206431 | Schuessler | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7212649 | Watanabe et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7213697 | Martin et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7216106 | Buchanan et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
| 7221445 | Earthman et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7222238 | Bleumer et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7222361 | Kemper | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7232024 | Mazur et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7236455 | Proudler et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
| 7239701 | Ogishi et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
| 7239703 | Higurashi et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7243773 | Bochonok et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7248730 | Matsui et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7248731 | Raterman et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7251347 | Smith | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7255338 | Wilfer et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7256874 | Csulits et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7268923 | Schroath et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7269279 | Chiles | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7272721 | Hellenthal | Sep 2007 | B1 |
| 7277183 | Deck | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7277601 | Zorab et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7299981 | Hickle et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7302578 | Kobayashi | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7302585 | Proudler et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
| 7302698 | Proudler et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
| 7303119 | Molbak | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7310819 | Maes et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7312902 | Mastie et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7318048 | King | Jan 2008 | B1 |
| 7320138 | Wakao et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7331521 | Serenson et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7333629 | Patton et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7336842 | Kondo | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7337890 | Bochonok et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7339869 | Ishibashi et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7340152 | Talstra et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
| 7341182 | Lai et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7346184 | Carr et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
| 7349566 | Jones et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7350716 | Gilfix et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7353399 | Ooi et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7353994 | Farrall et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7360682 | Shane et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7362891 | Jones et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7363505 | Black | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7366338 | Jones et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7377423 | Demmeler et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7380128 | Bourrieres et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7389420 | Tian | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7389530 | Raghunath et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7391889 | Kim et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7391897 | Jones et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7394573 | Goldberg et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
| 7395963 | Silverbrook et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7418593 | Paatero et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7419088 | Zhao et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7427020 | Haraszti et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7427230 | Blake et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7430668 | Chen et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
| 7437568 | Das-Purkayastha et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7438172 | Long et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7441712 | Silverbrook et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7444601 | Proudler et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7454049 | Paraskevakos | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7457951 | Proudler et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
| 7457961 | Lapstun et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7461249 | Pearson et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
| 7461778 | Silverbrook et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7464407 | Nakae et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7464802 | Gerrity et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7464879 | Silverbrook et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7467299 | Silverbrook et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7467300 | Lapstun et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7467301 | Silverbrook et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7469819 | Silverbrook et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7472278 | Lapstun et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7475429 | Carro | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7484101 | Lapstun et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7487549 | Kawamoto et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7489797 | Izquierdo | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7494052 | Carpenter et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
| 7496538 | Bleumer | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7497379 | Chen et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7505831 | Jones et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7506168 | Silverbrook et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7506365 | Hirano et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7513413 | Graef et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7520374 | Martin et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7520375 | Ina et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7526785 | Pearson et al. | Apr 2009 | B1 |
| 7536046 | Raterman et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7537157 | Silverbrook et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7542598 | Jones et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7551764 | Chiles et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7552340 | Ooi et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7552810 | Mecklenburg | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7552860 | Tani et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7565321 | Pailles | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7565542 | Silverbrook et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7567349 | Tearney et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7567698 | Paraskevakos | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7574377 | Carapelli | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7576842 | Park | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7577844 | Kirovski | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7580859 | Economy et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7580895 | Wilde et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7584198 | Slade | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7584351 | Kakii | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7590274 | Raterman et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7591428 | Freeman et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7599543 | Jones et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7599927 | Lebrat | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7599963 | Fernandez | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7600130 | Ooi et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7600626 | Hallowell et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7602904 | Juels et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7602956 | Jones et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7603566 | Hashimoto et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7605940 | Silverbrook et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7610489 | Maruyama et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7619721 | Jones et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7619782 | Mikami | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7620231 | Jones et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7624280 | Oskari | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7627906 | Nakagawa et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7628326 | Freeman et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7634653 | Horita et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7635082 | Jones | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7637419 | Silverbrook et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7647275 | Jones | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7647279 | Bourrieres et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7647501 | Imai | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7650980 | Jenrick et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7654450 | Mateen et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7658270 | Bochonok et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7658325 | Lapstun et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7663789 | Silverbrook et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7672499 | Raterman et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7673334 | Takemori et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7676382 | Silverbrook et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7677445 | Silverbrook et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7681049 | Wakao | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7681800 | Silverbrook et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7684069 | Kashiwazaki | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7684652 | Zorab et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7685429 | Suga | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7686151 | Renz et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7702108 | Amon et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7706568 | Yamazaki et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7716297 | Wittel et al. | May 2010 | B1 |
| 7716490 | Kanai | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7720314 | Minamino | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7724938 | Pareskevakos | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7725740 | Kudelski et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7726457 | Maier et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7731435 | Piersol et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7734915 | Neill et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7735621 | Hallowell et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7739509 | Silverbrook et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7743902 | Wendell et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7753189 | Maier et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7755768 | Mansfield | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7757091 | Duffell et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7757940 | Sawa | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7762380 | Freeman et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7773749 | Durst et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
| 7778456 | Jones et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7779263 | Kanai | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7779982 | Fitzgerald et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7784681 | Silverbrook et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7792753 | Slater et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
| 7793854 | Lapstun et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7797736 | Ooi et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7798403 | Tiller et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7800502 | Naccache | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7801742 | Silverbrook et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
| 7806317 | Laskowski | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7809156 | Piersol et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7809951 | Hellenthal | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7812935 | Cowburn et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7815109 | Silverbrook et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7817842 | Mennie | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7819308 | Osterberg et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7828215 | Chung et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7831042 | Stierman et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7849993 | Finkenzeller et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7849994 | Klein et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7850077 | Talwerdi et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7853792 | Cowburn | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7854386 | Silverbrook et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7873576 | Jones et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7874478 | Molbak | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7874489 | Mercolino | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7877799 | Proudler | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7881519 | Jones et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7882000 | Jones | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7882363 | Duffy et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7885428 | Stierman et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7885880 | Prasad et al. | Feb 2011 | B1 |
| 7886890 | Blake et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7891565 | Pinchen et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7896231 | Dcosta et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7900819 | Silverbrook et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7900829 | Folk et al. | Mar 2011 | B1 |
| 7900832 | Lapstun et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7903863 | Jones et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7905401 | Silverbrook et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7913924 | Silverbrook et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7920714 | O'Neil | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7922075 | Silverbrook et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7929749 | Jones et al. | Apr 2011 | B1 |
| 7931304 | Brown et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7932921 | Frazzitta et al. | Apr 2011 | B1 |
| 7938245 | Jenrick et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7940179 | Burbridge et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7946406 | Blake et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7946487 | Silverbrook et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7949148 | Rhoads et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7949582 | Mennie et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7958549 | Nakae et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7961358 | Mikami | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7962349 | Silverbrook et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7962411 | Prasad et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
| 7974899 | Prasad et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
| 7978077 | Lee et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7978899 | Jenrick et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7980378 | Jones et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7980467 | Silverbrook et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7991157 | Rhoads | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 7994915 | Sato | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 7995196 | Fraser | Aug 2011 | B1 |
| 7996669 | Pearson et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8001016 | Balinsky et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8009800 | Doyle et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8011581 | Folk et al. | Sep 2011 | B1 |
| 8015412 | Lapstun et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8023715 | Jones et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8028171 | Teranishi | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8035489 | Burbridge et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8037294 | Nochta | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8037307 | Irwin, Jr. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8040572 | Mikami | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8041098 | Jones et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8042192 | Kawamoto et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8047427 | Sanders et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8050501 | Hirohata | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8056822 | Bourrieres et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8058973 | Zeng et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8062737 | Abrams et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8073262 | Hirohata | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8077905 | Rhoads et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8078875 | Cowburn et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8096466 | Silverbrook et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8103084 | Jones et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8103580 | Sato et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8110008 | Perori et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8111431 | Silverbrook et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8117455 | Silverbrook et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8125624 | Jones et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8125697 | Massicot et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8126150 | Kasahara et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8126793 | Jones | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8127140 | Teranishi | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8141772 | Folk et al. | Mar 2012 | B1 |
| 8143705 | Van Geloven et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8150312 | Bappu et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8152072 | Silverbrook et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8159724 | Mikami | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8162125 | Csulits et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
| 8165958 | McLaughlin et al. | Apr 2012 | B1 |
| 8169602 | Jones et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8171567 | Fraser et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
| 8172674 | Koyama | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8180174 | Di Venuto et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8181869 | Lu et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8185742 | Kim et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8188857 | Chen et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8196807 | Grimard | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8204293 | Csulits et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8212651 | Bauchot et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8218765 | Proudler et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8223964 | Stierman et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8224018 | Rhoads et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8225989 | Turocy et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
| 8234700 | Ooi et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8235286 | Komatsu et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8238614 | Konishi | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8251196 | Dietz et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8256688 | Bourrieres et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8265346 | Blair | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8270603 | Durst et al. | Sep 2012 | B1 |
| 8270607 | Kim et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8275691 | Sato et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8280543 | Grau et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8285561 | Silverbrook et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8286222 | Silverbrook et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8286865 | Wilson | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8291221 | Shamir | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8291225 | Imai | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8291229 | Vuillaume et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8297428 | Renz et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8302176 | Huang | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8312281 | Silverbrook et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8322505 | Freeman et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8327150 | Yamamoto et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8331643 | Yacoubian et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8339589 | Jones et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8346610 | Mennie et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8347091 | Nonaka et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8347106 | Tsuria et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8351608 | Kobayashi | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8352322 | Mennie et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8380573 | Jones et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8386795 | Lu et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8391583 | Mennie et al. | Mar 2013 | B1 |
| 8392715 | Massicot et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8395504 | Furuichi et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8396278 | Jones et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8396586 | Klein et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8401268 | Yacoubian et al. | Mar 2013 | B1 |
| 8408470 | Komatsu et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8413888 | Jones | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8416057 | Bauchot et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8417017 | Beutel et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
| 8423765 | Neill et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8428332 | Csulits et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
| 8429416 | Ooi et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8433123 | Csulits et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
| 8433126 | Jones et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8437528 | Csulits et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
| 8437529 | Mennie et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
| 8437530 | Mennie et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
| 8437531 | Jones et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8437532 | Jones et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
| 8442296 | Jones et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8443196 | Lu et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8446250 | Kursawe et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8452672 | Lu et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8453820 | Hallowell et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8459436 | Jenrick et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8467591 | Csulits et al. | Jun 2013 | B1 |
| 8469282 | Freeman | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8478019 | Csulits et al. | Jul 2013 | B1 |
| 8478020 | Jones et al. | Jul 2013 | B1 |
| 8488842 | Wood et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8490191 | Kuegler et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8497983 | Cowburn et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8499146 | Feng et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8502669 | Guajardo Merchan et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8505104 | Lee et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8514379 | Jones et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8522036 | Le Floch | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8538123 | Csulits et al. | Sep 2013 | B1 |
| 8542904 | Beutel et al. | Sep 2013 | B1 |
| 8544656 | Mennie et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8549312 | Cui et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8559694 | Jenrick et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8559695 | Csulits et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
| 8561201 | Kanai | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8566919 | Meisel | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8572390 | Leclercq et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8578168 | Ramani et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8584245 | Proudler | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8590798 | Wilds et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8594414 | Jones et al. | Nov 2013 | B1 |
| 8606716 | Wilde et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8608065 | Wilson | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8612762 | Imai | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8615475 | Cowburn | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8621230 | Nachtigall | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8625875 | Csulits et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
| 8627939 | Jones et al. | Jan 2014 | B1 |
| 8639015 | Mennie et al. | Jan 2014 | B1 |
| 8644583 | Mennie et al. | Feb 2014 | B1 |
| 8644584 | Mennie et al. | Feb 2014 | B1 |
| 8644585 | Mennie et al. | Feb 2014 | B1 |
| 8645694 | Schrijen et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8655045 | Jones et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8655046 | Csulits et al. | Feb 2014 | B1 |
| 8661247 | Spalka et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8661525 | Yan et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 8682076 | Cowburn et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
| 8684157 | Freeman et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8688973 | Kerschbaum et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8689339 | Wang et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8694856 | Tuyls et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8695106 | Spalka et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8699088 | Cowburn | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8700501 | Loken | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8700905 | Guenther | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8701857 | Jenrick et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8714335 | Hallowell et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8714336 | Csulits et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8725289 | Klein et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8731202 | Kasahara et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8749386 | Cowburn | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8756648 | Hartung et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8757493 | Cowburn | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8766800 | Cowburn | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8776247 | Peeters et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8781206 | Yacoubian et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
| 8787582 | Yokota et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8787652 | Jones et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
| 8788803 | Irvine | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8788837 | Busch et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8789166 | Lu et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8791794 | Soppera et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8817977 | Bertoni et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8819118 | Wang et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8819409 | Kuipers et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
| 8832202 | Yoshioka | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8843744 | Sentinelli et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8848477 | Schrijen et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8856533 | Schrijen et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8874910 | Liu | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8886946 | Fraser et al. | Nov 2014 | B1 |
| 8892556 | Cowburn et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8896885 | Cowburn | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8908920 | Wood et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8910252 | Gu et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8910859 | Massicot et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8914638 | Kawamoto et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8929553 | Bauchot et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 8929640 | Mennie et al. | Jan 2015 | B1 |
| 8942372 | Kaulartz et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 8943325 | Boutant et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 8944234 | Csulits et al. | Feb 2015 | B1 |
| 8948392 | Chassagne | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 8948490 | Jones et al. | Feb 2015 | B1 |
| 8958626 | Mennie et al. | Feb 2015 | B1 |
| 8959590 | Huebler et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 8968094 | Yoshida et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8972300 | Nonaka et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8972721 | Neill et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8973817 | Daniel, III et al. | Mar 2015 | B1 |
| 8978864 | Jones et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8983231 | Sagan et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8985471 | Freeman | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8989387 | Bauchot et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 9004255 | Mennie et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9019567 | Cowburn | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9044543 | Levien et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9061102 | Levien et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9064260 | Fraser et al. | Jun 2015 | B1 |
| 9076092 | Ritamaki et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
| 9077520 | Garcia Morchon et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
| 9081988 | Dolev | Jul 2015 | B2 |
| 9085241 | Asano et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
| 9125987 | Levien et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 9129271 | Jenrick et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 9141876 | Jones et al. | Sep 2015 | B1 |
| 9142075 | Csulits et al. | Sep 2015 | B1 |
| 9158906 | Guajardo Merchan et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
| 9162470 | Wazana et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
| 9172535 | Yokota et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
| 9189780 | Jones et al. | Nov 2015 | B1 |
| 9193173 | Ryu et al. | Nov 2015 | B1 |
| 9195889 | Klein et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
| 9202328 | Komatsu et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9208394 | Di Venuto Dayer et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9220971 | Rynda et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9220972 | Grauzer et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9225618 | Riguidel et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9233298 | Sines | Jan 2016 | B2 |
| 9247024 | Talstra et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
| 9251634 | Fraser et al. | Feb 2016 | B1 |
| 9254363 | Levien et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
| 9259640 | Grauzer et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
| 9266011 | Johnson | Feb 2016 | B2 |
| 9266012 | Grauzer et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
| 9269034 | Manion et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
| 9313025 | Bauchot et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
| 9332430 | Robshaw et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
| 9350330 | Simons et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
| 9361744 | Mandridake et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
| 9386101 | Kawamoto et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
| 9390345 | Di Venuto Dayer, V et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
| 9398049 | Fries et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
| 9411976 | Irvine | Aug 2016 | B2 |
| 9418242 | Spalka et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
| 20010006556 | Graves et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
| 20010006557 | Mennie et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
| 20010015311 | Mennie | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20010018739 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20010019624 | Raterman et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20010021926 | Schneck et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20010026629 | Oki | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010034203 | Geib et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010035603 | Graves et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010041214 | Brogger et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010048025 | Shinn | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20010050247 | Myer | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20010053241 | Haycock | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020001393 | Jones et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020004800 | Kikuta et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020010684 | Moskowitz | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020020603 | Jones et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020023212 | Proudler | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020026422 | Kersten et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020026576 | Das-Purkayastha et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020033359 | Graef et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020034977 | Burns et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020035547 | Bleumer | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020037097 | Hoyos et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020041787 | Thomas | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020042884 | Wu et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020049681 | Herreweghen | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020054680 | Huang et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020056605 | Mazur et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020061120 | Carr et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020065033 | Geib et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020066637 | Otsuka et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020069104 | Beach et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020074209 | Karlsson | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020082993 | Hoyos et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020085245 | Mennie et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020085745 | Jones et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020091555 | Leppink | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020095587 | Doyle et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020100660 | Stieber et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020102007 | Wang | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020103757 | Jones et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020104785 | Klein et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020105654 | Goltsos | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020107738 | Beach et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020107801 | Jones et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020111837 | Aupperle | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020116329 | Serbetcioglu et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020116619 | Maruyama et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020118871 | Jones et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020120572 | Bellucci et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020120592 | Juels et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020120876 | Pearson et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020122580 | Jones et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020126885 | Mennie et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020126886 | Jones et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020129012 | Green | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020130011 | Casanova et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020131630 | Jones et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020136442 | Jones et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020138730 | Kim | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020138733 | Ishibashi et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020145035 | Jones | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020147588 | Davis et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020151267 | Kuhlin et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020154804 | Jones et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020154805 | Jones et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020154806 | Jones et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020154807 | Jones et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020154808 | Jones et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020157005 | Brunk et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020164021 | Sandru | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020166064 | Harrison | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020170966 | Hannigan et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020174348 | Ting | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020179401 | Knox et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020180778 | Proudler | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020181805 | Loeb et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020186876 | Jones et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020188763 | Griffin | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020190953 | Gordon et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020194010 | Bergler et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020194209 | Bolosky et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030002067 | Miyano | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030004878 | Akutsu et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030005303 | Auslander et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030006277 | Maskatiya et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030009420 | Jones | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030012374 | Wu et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030013403 | Blake et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030014647 | Bourrieres et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030015395 | Hallowell et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030015396 | Mennie | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030018587 | Althoff et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030023342 | Christl et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030023557 | Moore | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030028494 | King et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030028775 | Bleumer et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030035539 | Thaxton | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030041250 | Proudler | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030059098 | Jones et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030062242 | Hallowell et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030080032 | Heidel et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030081824 | Mennie et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030085271 | Laskowski | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030090698 | Maes et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030091189 | Rhoads | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030093690 | Kemper | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030099379 | Monk et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030102660 | Rhoads | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030105739 | Essafi et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030105950 | Hirano et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030108233 | Raterman et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030112471 | Damera-Venkata et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030118191 | Wang et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030121752 | Stromme et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030121753 | Stromme et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030127299 | Jones et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030128240 | Martinez et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030132281 | Jones et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030138128 | Rhoads | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030139994 | Jones | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030156294 | D'Agraives et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030156303 | Schnee et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030168308 | Maier et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030168309 | Geib et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030168310 | Strauts et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030174874 | Raterman et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030178487 | Rogers | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030182217 | Chiles | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030182246 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030183685 | Steele Moore et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030190882 | Blake et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030198373 | Raterman et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030200438 | Kirovski et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030201318 | Graef et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030202690 | Jones et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030204812 | Hayashi | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030210802 | Schuessler | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030212828 | Miyazaki et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030219145 | Smith | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030221107 | Kang | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030223584 | Bradley et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030229792 | Baldwin et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030231806 | Troyanker | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030233317 | Judd | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030234153 | Blake et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040001233 | Wang et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040001604 | Amidror | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040003980 | Hallowell et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040010686 | Goh et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040010697 | White | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040016621 | Jenrick et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040016797 | Jones et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040016810 | Hori et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040021890 | Hirai et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040022444 | Rhoads | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040025031 | Ooi et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040028266 | Jones et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040031849 | Hori et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040037456 | Haycock | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040044956 | Huang | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040052377 | Mattox et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040055902 | Peklo | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040057581 | Rhoads | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040059952 | Newport et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040060990 | Hilton et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040061326 | Hilton et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040061327 | Hilton et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040075869 | Hilton et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040078333 | Hilton et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040083149 | Jones | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040083166 | Pailles | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040092222 | Kowalczyk et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040094723 | Walker | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040099580 | Brotherston et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040101158 | Butler | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040125488 | Zhu et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040128523 | Fujioka | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040131230 | Paraskevakos | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040145661 | Murakami et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040145726 | Csulits et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040149538 | Sakowski | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040153406 | Alarcon-Luther et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040153408 | Jones et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040153421 | Robinson | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040153649 | Rhoads et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040154899 | Peklo et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040154964 | Jones | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040155913 | Kosugi et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040156529 | Davis et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040169366 | Duffell et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040172557 | Nakae et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040173432 | Jones | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040179267 | Moon et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040182675 | Long et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040188221 | Carter | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040190085 | Silverbrook et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040196759 | Ishibashi et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040199765 | Kohane et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040200691 | Geib et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040210762 | Kawamoto et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040211829 | Steinkogler et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040212826 | Kashiwazaki | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040236959 | Kudelski et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040238619 | Nagasaka et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040251110 | Jenrick et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040255117 | Paatero et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040256197 | Blake et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040258276 | Ishii et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040264734 | Wakao | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050006197 | Wendell et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050006472 | Verschuur et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050013462 | Rhoads | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050018873 | Rhoads | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050021948 | Kamperman | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050029168 | Jones et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050035034 | Long et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050035140 | Carter | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050036651 | Wen | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050038756 | Nagel | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050040007 | Geib et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050040225 | Csulits et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050044385 | Holdsworth | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050045448 | Sugano et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050045450 | Geib et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050045531 | Bretschneider et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050047642 | Jones et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050055557 | Yamada et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050060055 | Hallowell et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050060059 | Klein et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050060061 | Jones et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050060171 | Molnar | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050060555 | Raghunath et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050067305 | Bochonok et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050068152 | Umehara et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050075984 | Bourrieres et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050076209 | Proudler | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050077142 | Tam et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050077488 | Nekrasov et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050078937 | Higurashi et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050086271 | Jones et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050087422 | Maier et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050087425 | Peklo | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050091497 | Wakao | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050097060 | Lee et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050097332 | Imai | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050101841 | Kaylor et al. | May 2005 | A9 |
| 20050108057 | Cohen et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050108164 | Salafia, III et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050108165 | Jones et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050108548 | Ohta | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050109836 | Ben-Aissa | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050110978 | Potyrailo et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050114677 | Kanai | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050117791 | Raterman et al. | Jun 2005 | A2 |
| 20050117792 | Graves et al. | Jun 2005 | A2 |
| 20050122209 | Black | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050124407 | Rowe | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050134896 | Koga | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050135260 | Todd | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050135656 | Alattar et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050144438 | Hashimoto et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050150738 | Hallowell et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050150740 | Finkenzeller et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050151995 | Hauser et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050156318 | Douglas | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050161501 | Giering et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050163361 | Jones et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050163362 | Jones et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050169511 | Jones | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050173221 | Maier et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050178841 | Jones et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050180599 | Davis et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050183928 | Jones et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050199723 | Lubow | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050204164 | Kakii | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050205654 | Carter | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050205655 | Carter | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050207634 | Jones et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050213803 | Mennie | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050217969 | Coombs et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050223221 | Proudler et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050228717 | Gusler et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050229006 | De Moura et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050236113 | Tani et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050240610 | Tani et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050241909 | Mazur et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050249394 | Jones et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050256792 | Shimizu et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050257064 | Boutant et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050258234 | Silverbrook et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050258235 | Silverbrook et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050259818 | Silverbrook et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050261935 | Silverbrook et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050261936 | Silverbrook et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050261937 | Silverbrook et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050261938 | Silverbrook et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050262034 | Carro | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050262348 | Silverbrook et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050262349 | Lapstun et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050265591 | Jones et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050267843 | Acharya et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050268328 | Corliano | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050273597 | Lapstun et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050273598 | Silverbrook et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050273615 | Silverbrook et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050276458 | Jones et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050278239 | Jones et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050281434 | Handley et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050281450 | Richardson | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050286736 | Rhoads | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050289030 | Smith | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050289182 | Pandian et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060002550 | Campagna et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060010071 | Jones et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060010500 | Elazar et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060016883 | Silva et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060022059 | Juds | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060031790 | Proudler et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060037835 | Doran et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060047968 | Nakagawa et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060048228 | Takemori et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060054454 | Oh | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060054455 | Kuykendall et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060054457 | Long et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060060363 | Carter | Mar 2006 | A2 |
| 20060064379 | Doran et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060069654 | Beach et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060072755 | Oskari | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060075246 | Suga | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060075255 | Duffy et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060078186 | Freeman et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060080255 | Riehl et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060081509 | Otsuka | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060089893 | Joseph et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060091200 | Lai et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060098993 | Yang | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060100920 | Pretorius et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060102830 | Brill et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060104103 | Colineau et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060104449 | Akkermans et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060106717 | Randle et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060123476 | Yaghmour | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060124724 | Kotovich et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060136317 | Mizrah | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060148394 | Blake et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060149415 | Richards | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060151285 | String | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060153380 | Gertner | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060154589 | String | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060157390 | Otsuka | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060161977 | Jung et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060163504 | Fujimoto et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060166381 | Lange | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060168657 | Baentsch et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060175176 | Blake | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060180515 | Kimura et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060182330 | Chiles | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060195567 | Mody et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060196754 | Bochonok et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060197651 | Lee et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060200661 | Doonan et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060205481 | Dominelli | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060207856 | Dean et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060210137 | Raterman et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060210138 | Hilton et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060213979 | Geller et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060219519 | Molbak et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060229979 | Sato et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060230276 | Nochta | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060230286 | Kitada | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060242088 | Yamamoto et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060251291 | Rhoads | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060256959 | Hymes | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060268259 | Park | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060274929 | Jones et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060283685 | Cousin | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060290136 | Alasia et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060294583 | Cowburn et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070000819 | Yui | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070012784 | Mercolino | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070021843 | Neill et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070023494 | Haraszti et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070025619 | Cowburn et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070027819 | Cowburn et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070028093 | Cowburn et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070028107 | Cowburn et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070028108 | Cowburn et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070036470 | Piersol et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070036599 | Piersol et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070040014 | Zhao et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070043633 | Balinsky et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070051582 | Bochonok et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070053005 | Cowburn | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070055885 | Yamazaki et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070057768 | Zeng et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070058037 | Bergeron et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070058803 | Suga | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070064991 | Douglas et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070069852 | Mo et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070071302 | Jones et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070076939 | Jones et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070078560 | Jones et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070086345 | Yashima et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070095630 | Mennie et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070095898 | Uno et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070102863 | Burns et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070108015 | Bochonok et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070112674 | Jones | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070113076 | Cowburn et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070115497 | Cowburn | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070118739 | Togashi et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070119681 | Blake et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070122023 | Jenrick et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070127772 | Schuessler | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070136599 | Suga | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070136612 | Asano et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070152034 | Dietz et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070152056 | Tuschel et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070153078 | Cowburn | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070153269 | Wang et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070157827 | Mikami | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070162961 | Tarrance et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070164729 | Cowburn et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070165208 | Cowburn et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070170257 | Haraszti | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070172106 | Paraskevakos | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070172107 | Jones et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070174626 | Huh et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070180507 | Lu et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070181676 | Mateen et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070185811 | Weiss et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070186287 | Slade | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070187494 | Hanna | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070188775 | Minamino | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070188793 | Wakai | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070192841 | Kim | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070192850 | Cowburn | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070194879 | Backes et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070199047 | Gibart et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070199991 | Haraszti et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070205256 | Uno et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070208949 | Lu et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070209904 | Freeman et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070221470 | Mennie et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070237381 | Mennie et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070253001 | Watanabe et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070253260 | Pavlis et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070255784 | Takechi et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070258633 | Jones et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070269097 | Chiles et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070271456 | Ward et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070278064 | Hallowell et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070282749 | Nonaka et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070288382 | Narayanan et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070291328 | Furihata et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070291988 | Karimov et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070294771 | Talstra et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080000971 | Lu et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080002243 | Cowburn | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080006505 | Renz et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080010464 | Hellenthal | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080010689 | Ooi et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080011847 | Silverbrook et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080011849 | Silverbrook et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080011862 | Silverbrook et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080013124 | Silverbrook et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080016358 | Filreis et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080016362 | Silverbrook et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080016363 | Lapstun et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080016364 | Silverbrook et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080017710 | Silverbrook et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080021857 | Makishima et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080022112 | Silverbrook et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080022128 | Proudler et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080033829 | Mennie et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080037783 | Kim et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080037855 | Silverbrook et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080037856 | Paraskevakos | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080042804 | Burbridge et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080043278 | Suzuki | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080044026 | Walters et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080044077 | Mennie et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080044096 | Cowburn et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080050004 | Silverbrook et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080051033 | Hymes | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080052189 | Walker et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080060906 | Fitzgerald et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080071421 | Silverbrook et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080072052 | Suzuki | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080074702 | Miyoshi | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080077798 | Nachtigall | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080088455 | Lu et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080098471 | Ooi et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080099548 | Silverbrook et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080099555 | Silva et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080100449 | Naccache | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080101601 | Ramani et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080101606 | Silverbrook et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080123932 | Jones et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080133411 | Jones et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080141126 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080142671 | Bourrieres et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080149700 | Tuyls et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080152130 | Teranishi | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080155648 | Chae et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080156874 | Zorab et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080159529 | Aarts et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080159535 | Kim et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080161114 | Wang et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080165005 | Burbridge et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080165701 | Ananthanarayanan et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080172739 | Nakae et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080177420 | Klein et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080191839 | Sato | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080191882 | Zhou et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080197972 | Lawson et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080209214 | Schrijen et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080209511 | Silverbrook et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080209512 | Silverbrook et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080215489 | Lawson et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080217931 | Bourrieres et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080219503 | Di Venuto et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080219543 | Csulits et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080220707 | Jones et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080222042 | Moore et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080224823 | Lawson et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080227385 | Bappu et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080237359 | Silverbrook et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080240816 | Piersol et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080255990 | Moore et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080256353 | Hung et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080256600 | Schrijen et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080260155 | Kasahara et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080260199 | Cowburn | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080267511 | Bourrieres et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080272186 | Silverbrook et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080272886 | Tiller et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080281759 | Weissglas et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080282339 | Nakae et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080285838 | Jones et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080291801 | Staring et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080292098 | Akima et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080294900 | Cowburn | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080301449 | Teranishi | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080307221 | Horita et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080313087 | Joseph et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080313467 | Lapstun et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080313706 | Lapstun et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080314715 | Wolters et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080317280 | Silverbrook et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090001661 | Klein et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090007257 | Hirata et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090013181 | Choi et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090013653 | Sekiguchi et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090016535 | Cowburn | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090018959 | Doran et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090022317 | Akima et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090022390 | Yacoubian et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090031141 | Pearson et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090032583 | Lapstun et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090033464 | Friedrich | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090037739 | Silverbrook et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090045911 | Bauchot et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090045943 | Chen et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090049536 | Ooi et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090057400 | Silverbrook et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090067724 | Hirohata | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090067727 | Hirohata | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090074182 | Kawamoto et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090077385 | Silverbrook et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090080782 | Konishi | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090083372 | Teppler | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090084859 | Lapstun et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090087076 | Jenrick et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090090779 | Freeman et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090091790 | Silverbrook et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090100079 | Yoshioka | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090100262 | Yoo | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090104981 | Koyama | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090113545 | Pic et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090122352 | Silverbrook et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090125387 | Mak et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090125429 | Takayama | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090125723 | Lapstun et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090125724 | Lapstun et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090132420 | Silverbrook et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090141962 | Borgia et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090144620 | Bauchot et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090145959 | VanKirk et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090148025 | Calman | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090148027 | Paraskevakos | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090167489 | Nan et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090169019 | Bauchot et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090183967 | Hamasaki | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090187766 | Vuillaume et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090194589 | Moon et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090222285 | Silverbrook et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090235069 | Sonnega et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090236200 | Hallowell et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090236201 | Blake et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090239459 | Watts et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090242626 | Jones et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090254755 | Silverbrook et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090254991 | Boulanger et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090260058 | Huang | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090261158 | Lawson | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090271860 | Nonaka et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090273451 | Soppera et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090274304 | Kobayashi | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090282259 | Skoric et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090283583 | Cowburn et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090283589 | Moore et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090290906 | Cowburn | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090292918 | Mori et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090292925 | Meisel | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090293112 | Moore et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090302123 | Lugt et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090303000 | Cowburn et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090303044 | Furuichi et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090307112 | Cowburn et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090308530 | Massicot et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090310188 | Jones et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090313159 | Jones et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090319798 | Ooi et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090320106 | Jones et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090328187 | Meisel | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100001069 | Silverbrook et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100002267 | Mikami | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100004875 | Urano et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100005299 | Iwase | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100007930 | Cowburn et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100008590 | Cowburn | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100017879 | Kuegler et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100025478 | Silverbrook et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100026461 | Merchan et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100034454 | Jones et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100038419 | Blake et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100044431 | Komatsu et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100051687 | Jones et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100057617 | Jones et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100063916 | Jones et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100064354 | Irvine | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100067691 | Lin et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100077207 | Imai | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100090005 | Silverbrook et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100092065 | Jones et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100108463 | Renz et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100116619 | Jones | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100128072 | Wagner | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100128925 | Stierman et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100128964 | Blair | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100135485 | Lapstun et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100138663 | Silverbrook et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100138668 | Tsuria et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100141380 | Pishva | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100146636 | Lee et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100147941 | Silverbrook et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100147942 | Silverbrook et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100155467 | Silverbrook et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100158377 | Cowburn et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100161529 | Cowburn | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100163366 | Jenrick et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100166063 | Perlman et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100166064 | Perlman et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100167809 | Perlman et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100174915 | Prokin | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100187527 | Van Geloven et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100193590 | Komatsu et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100198726 | Doran et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100205433 | Neill et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100228675 | Sato et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100235627 | Kerschbaum et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100235640 | Satoh | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100235643 | Silverbrook et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100236892 | Jones et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100237145 | Silverbrook et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100244429 | Sato et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100258641 | Yu | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100261421 | Wendell et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100263984 | Freeman et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100268774 | Wang et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100271914 | Talstra et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100276485 | Jones et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100277446 | van Veenendaal et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100280647 | Grau et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100288840 | Perez | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100299528 | Le Floch | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20100303111 | Kupershmidt | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100306111 | Slater et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100306532 | Komatsu et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100312705 | Caruso et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100316251 | Cowburn et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100327005 | Martin et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100332837 | Osterwalder | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100333184 | Ooi et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110031310 | Wilson | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110035316 | Morgan et al. | Feb 2011 | A2 |
| 20110042178 | Luecking | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110047200 | Reffe | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110047386 | Lu et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110064216 | Naccache et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110087599 | Jones | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110098845 | Blake et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110099105 | Mennie et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110099117 | Schepers et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110103586 | Nobre | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110114718 | Wilds et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110125652 | Sato et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110135160 | Sagan et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110138191 | Bond | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110161668 | Sentinelli et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110170761 | Fu | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110173452 | Nan et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110179286 | Spalka et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110179289 | Guenther | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110183733 | Yoshida et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110184575 | Kawamoto et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110184580 | Kawamoto et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110184585 | Matsuda et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110184586 | Asano et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110185173 | Liu | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110185188 | Spalka et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110185196 | Asano et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110191837 | Guajardo Merchan et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110192906 | Wilds et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110203003 | Peeters et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110205597 | Mikami | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110206267 | Jones et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110215034 | Mennie et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110215145 | Silverbrook et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110219228 | Kaulartz et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110220717 | Jones et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110231297 | Sato et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110243375 | Rhoads | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110255767 | Jenrick et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110258113 | Jones et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110264908 | Feng et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110271105 | Shamir | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110307691 | Riguidel et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110309910 | Lee | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110317838 | Garcia Morchon et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120002900 | Mikami | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120008131 | Jones et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120008850 | Jones et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120013891 | Jones et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120013892 | Jones et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120023335 | Bals et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120027214 | Yokota et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120036564 | Gu et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120054099 | Fox et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120056002 | Ritamaki et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120060215 | Cui et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120061461 | Bourrieres et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120069994 | Bertoni et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120077476 | Paraskevakos et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120101947 | Hawkins | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120104097 | Moran et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120111939 | Silverbrook et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120130868 | Loken | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120136792 | Yu | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120137135 | Kasahara et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120137136 | Teranishi | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120144503 | Massicot et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120150745 | Csulits et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120166800 | Massicot et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120168506 | Ruehrmair et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120179952 | Tuyls et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120180122 | Yan et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120185083 | Klein et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120189186 | Csulits et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120210120 | Irvine | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120210408 | Lu et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120215391 | Schaefer et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120215689 | Jones | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120222094 | Huebler et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20120226600 | Dolev | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120229872 | Dolev | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120242452 | Bauchot et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120243797 | Di Venuto Dayer et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120260088 | Fries et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120269412 | Guan et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120297464 | Busch et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120313316 | Yamamoto et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120321170 | Jones et al. | Dec 2012 | A2 |
| 20120324534 | Mandridake et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120327450 | Sagan et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120331299 | Imai | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130003973 | Shamir | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130031008 | Wilson | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130043982 | Robshaw et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130061049 | Irvine | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130067508 | Janssen | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130068585 | Freeman et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130098992 | Jenrick et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130117633 | Matsukawa et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130148874 | Jones et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130193205 | Jones | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130194886 | Schrijen et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130200144 | Massicot et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130200606 | Omar | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130213864 | Mennie et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130219184 | Amaya Calvo et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20130234771 | Simons et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130238899 | Neill et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130251150 | Chassagne | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130268444 | Namgoong et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130327686 | Mennie et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
| 20140175173 | Jenrick et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140181512 | Spalka et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140189372 | Spalka et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140237614 | Irvine | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140369496 | Yokota et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
| 20150006408 | Mak et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150058635 | Bauchot et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150074779 | Gu et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150312440 | Dolev | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20160140420 | Di Venuto Dayer et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
| 20160173285 | Bauchot et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2143943 | Mar 1994 | CA |
| 2189330 | Nov 1995 | CA |
| 2235925 | Nov 1995 | CA |
| 2292594 | Dec 1998 | CA |
| 2624638 | Dec 2007 | CA |
| 2684159 | Apr 2010 | CA |
| 1430175 | Jul 2003 | CN |
| 1588847 | Mar 2005 | CN |
| 0660354 | Apr 1938 | DE |
| 2446280 | Apr 1975 | DE |
| 2528735 | Apr 1976 | DE |
| 2659929 | Nov 1977 | DE |
| 2824849 | Dec 1979 | DE |
| 2935668 | May 1980 | DE |
| 3021327 | Dec 1981 | DE |
| 4407559 | Nov 1995 | DE |
| 19632269 | Feb 1997 | DE |
| 19612819 | Oct 1997 | DE |
| 19650875 | Oct 1997 | DE |
| 29817253 | Feb 1999 | DE |
| 19824435 | Dec 1999 | DE |
| 10049435 | Apr 2002 | DE |
| 10064009 | Jul 2002 | DE |
| 10155780 | May 2003 | DE |
| 10160585 | Jul 2003 | DE |
| 10234431 | Feb 2004 | DE |
| 10344576 | Dec 2004 | DE |
| 0030413 | Jun 1981 | EP |
| 0071421 | Feb 1983 | EP |
| 0077464 | Apr 1983 | EP |
| 0083062 | Jul 1983 | EP |
| 0101115 | Feb 1984 | EP |
| 0109743 | May 1984 | EP |
| 0130824 | Jan 1985 | EP |
| 0130825 | Jan 1985 | EP |
| 0132329 | Jan 1985 | EP |
| 0161181 | Nov 1985 | EP |
| 0185200 | Jun 1986 | EP |
| 0203499 | Dec 1986 | EP |
| 0206675 | Dec 1986 | EP |
| 0234105 | Sep 1987 | EP |
| 0253935 | Jan 1988 | EP |
| 0264125 | Apr 1988 | EP |
| 0278058 | Aug 1988 | EP |
| 0284736 | Oct 1988 | EP |
| 0302458 | Feb 1989 | EP |
| 0314312 | May 1989 | EP |
| 0325364 | Jul 1989 | EP |
| 0328320 | Aug 1989 | EP |
| 0334201 | Sep 1989 | EP |
| 0338123 | Oct 1989 | EP |
| 0342647 | Nov 1989 | EP |
| 0351217 | Jan 1990 | EP |
| 0378198 | Jul 1990 | EP |
| 0388090 | Sep 1990 | EP |
| 0402627 | Dec 1990 | EP |
| 0416916 | Mar 1991 | EP |
| 0416960 | Mar 1991 | EP |
| 0472192 | Aug 1991 | EP |
| 0457558 | Nov 1991 | EP |
| 0472192 | Feb 1992 | EP |
| 0473106 | Mar 1992 | EP |
| 0480620 | Apr 1992 | EP |
| 0480684 | Apr 1992 | EP |
| 0482116 | Apr 1992 | EP |
| 0548142 | Jun 1993 | EP |
| 0552294 | Jul 1993 | EP |
| 0570162 | Nov 1993 | EP |
| 0578875 | Jan 1994 | EP |
| 0583526 | Feb 1994 | EP |
| 0583709 | Feb 1994 | EP |
| 0583723 | Feb 1994 | EP |
| 0590826 | Apr 1994 | EP |
| 0593209 | Apr 1994 | EP |
| 0595596 | May 1994 | EP |
| 0612042 | Aug 1994 | EP |
| 0613107 | Aug 1994 | EP |
| 0616296 | Sep 1994 | EP |
| 0632415 | Jan 1995 | EP |
| 0633533 | Jan 1995 | EP |
| 0633552 | Jan 1995 | EP |
| 0633553 | Jan 1995 | EP |
| 0660270 | Jun 1995 | EP |
| 0661654 | Jul 1995 | EP |
| 0667973 | Aug 1995 | EP |
| 0671696 | Sep 1995 | EP |
| 0682328 | Nov 1995 | EP |
| 0686292 | Dec 1995 | EP |
| 0691632 | Jan 1996 | EP |
| 0708419 | Apr 1996 | EP |
| 0710944 | May 1996 | EP |
| 0718809 | Jun 1996 | EP |
| 0760987 | Mar 1997 | EP |
| 0824736 | Feb 1998 | EP |
| 0853294 | Jul 1998 | EP |
| 0887723 | Dec 1998 | EP |
| 0922504 | Jun 1999 | EP |
| 0984410 | Mar 2000 | EP |
| 1004089 | May 2000 | EP |
| 1008096 | Jun 2000 | EP |
| 1019869 | Jul 2000 | EP |
| 1028359 | Aug 2000 | EP |
| 1041523 | Oct 2000 | EP |
| 1087348 | Mar 2001 | EP |
| 1104920 | Jun 2001 | EP |
| 1111553 | Jun 2001 | EP |
| 1134704 | Sep 2001 | EP |
| 1139302 | Oct 2001 | EP |
| 1160737 | Dec 2001 | EP |
| 1195725 | Apr 2002 | EP |
| 1199682 | Apr 2002 | EP |
| 1202225 | May 2002 | EP |
| 1209639 | May 2002 | EP |
| 1239413 | Sep 2002 | EP |
| 1253560 | Oct 2002 | EP |
| 1273461 | Jan 2003 | EP |
| 1276080 | Jan 2003 | EP |
| 1286315 | Feb 2003 | EP |
| 1297498 | Apr 2003 | EP |
| 1326207 | Jul 2003 | EP |
| 1360655 | Nov 2003 | EP |
| 1388797 | Feb 2004 | EP |
| 1418542 | May 2004 | EP |
| 1434161 | Jun 2004 | EP |
| 1437692 | Jul 2004 | EP |
| 1445740 | Aug 2004 | EP |
| 1458576 | Sep 2004 | EP |
| 1459267 | Sep 2004 | EP |
| 1480177 | Nov 2004 | EP |
| 1484719 | Dec 2004 | EP |
| 1507227 | Feb 2005 | EP |
| 1515281 | Mar 2005 | EP |
| 1516295 | Mar 2005 | EP |
| 1528513 | May 2005 | EP |
| 1577812 | Sep 2005 | EP |
| 1587030 | Oct 2005 | EP |
| 1616711 | Jan 2006 | EP |
| 1643460 | Apr 2006 | EP |
| 1699569 | Sep 2006 | EP |
| 1730707 | Dec 2006 | EP |
| 1762526 | Mar 2007 | EP |
| 1785953 | May 2007 | EP |
| 1990779 | Nov 2008 | EP |
| 2042254 | Feb 1971 | FR |
| 7011438 | Feb 1971 | FR |
| 2539898 | Jul 1984 | FR |
| 2722316 | Jan 1996 | FR |
| 2765014 | Dec 1998 | FR |
| 2778483 | Nov 1999 | FR |
| 2848318 | Jun 2004 | FR |
| 1138011 | Dec 1968 | GB |
| 1319928 | Jun 1973 | GB |
| 1458726 | Dec 1976 | GB |
| 1489084 | Oct 1977 | GB |
| 2035642 | Jun 1980 | GB |
| 2038063 | Jul 1980 | GB |
| 2061232 | May 1981 | GB |
| 2088832 | Jun 1982 | GB |
| 2097979 | Nov 1982 | GB |
| 2119138 | Nov 1983 | GB |
| 2175427 | Nov 1986 | GB |
| 2190996 | Dec 1987 | GB |
| 2198274 | Jun 1988 | GB |
| 2204166 | Nov 1988 | GB |
| 2221870 | Feb 1990 | GB |
| 2223872 | Apr 1990 | GB |
| 2224240 | May 1990 | GB |
| 2228821 | Sep 1990 | GB |
| 2272762 | May 1994 | GB |
| 2278832 | Dec 1994 | GB |
| 2304077 | Mar 1997 | GB |
| 2346110 | Aug 2000 | GB |
| 2346111 | Aug 2000 | GB |
| 2355522 | Apr 2001 | GB |
| 2411954 | Sep 2005 | GB |
| 2417074 | Feb 2006 | GB |
| 2417592 | Mar 2006 | GB |
| 2417707 | Mar 2006 | GB |
| 2426100 | Nov 2006 | GB |
| 2428846 | Feb 2007 | GB |
| 2428948 | Feb 2007 | GB |
| 2429092 | Feb 2007 | GB |
| 2429095 | Feb 2007 | GB |
| 2429096 | Feb 2007 | GB |
| 2429097 | Feb 2007 | GB |
| 2431759 | May 2007 | GB |
| 2433632 | Jun 2007 | GB |
| 2434642 | Aug 2007 | GB |
| 2439512 | Dec 2007 | GB |
| 2440386 | Jan 2008 | GB |
| 2458387 | Sep 2009 | GB |
| 2462059 | Jan 2010 | GB |
| 2464826 | May 2010 | GB |
| 2468783 | Sep 2010 | GB |
| 49058899 | Jun 1974 | JP |
| 52014495 | Feb 1977 | JP |
| 52071300 | Jun 1977 | JP |
| 54071673 | Jun 1979 | JP |
| 54071674 | Jun 1979 | JP |
| 54118138 | Sep 1979 | JP |
| 56016287 | Feb 1981 | JP |
| 56040992 | Apr 1981 | JP |
| 56136689 | Oct 1981 | JP |
| 57117080 | Jul 1982 | JP |
| 57212567 | Dec 1982 | JP |
| 59079392 | May 1984 | JP |
| 59130581 | Jul 1984 | JP |
| 60016271 | Feb 1985 | JP |
| 60052454 | Mar 1985 | JP |
| 61014557 | Jan 1986 | JP |
| 61041439 | Jan 1986 | JP |
| 6141397 | Mar 1986 | JP |
| 62134168 | Feb 1987 | JP |
| 62163195 | Jul 1987 | JP |
| 62220843 | Sep 1987 | JP |
| 62221773 | Sep 1987 | JP |
| 62082493 | Oct 1987 | JP |
| 62166562 | Oct 1987 | JP |
| 62182995 | Nov 1987 | JP |
| 63073497 | Apr 1988 | JP |
| 64035683 | Feb 1989 | JP |
| 64042789 | Feb 1989 | JP |
| 64067698 | Mar 1989 | JP |
| 01118995 | May 1989 | JP |
| 01307891 | Dec 1989 | JP |
| 02012492 | Jan 1990 | JP |
| 02050793 | Feb 1990 | JP |
| 02183879 | Jul 1990 | JP |
| 02252096 | Oct 1990 | JP |
| 02302894 | Dec 1990 | JP |
| 03012776 | Jan 1991 | JP |
| 03063795 | Mar 1991 | JP |
| 03092994 | Apr 1991 | JP |
| 03098945 | Apr 1991 | JP |
| 03111991 | May 1991 | JP |
| 03156673 | Jul 1991 | JP |
| 03188592 | Aug 1991 | JP |
| 04085695 | Mar 1992 | JP |
| 04131986 | May 1992 | JP |
| 04175993 | Jun 1992 | JP |
| 04243497 | Aug 1992 | JP |
| 04275696 | Oct 1992 | JP |
| 05046839 | Feb 1993 | JP |
| 05217048 | Aug 1993 | JP |
| 05274527 | Oct 1993 | JP |
| 06035946 | Feb 1994 | JP |
| 06103285 | Apr 1994 | JP |
| 06203248 | Jul 1994 | JP |
| 07061417 | Mar 1995 | JP |
| 07168857 | Jul 1995 | JP |
| 08217269 | Aug 1996 | JP |
| 09218910 | Aug 1997 | JP |
| 09251566 | Sep 1997 | JP |
| 10143711 | May 1998 | JP |
| 10269396 | Oct 1998 | JP |
| 11212454 | Aug 1999 | JP |
| 2000011230 | Jan 2000 | JP |
| 2000149087 | May 2000 | JP |
| 2000215379 | Aug 2000 | JP |
| 2000293105 | Oct 2000 | JP |
| 2001521658 | Nov 2001 | JP |
| 2002092682 | Mar 2002 | JP |
| 2002117439 | Apr 2002 | JP |
| 2002230202 | Aug 2002 | JP |
| 2003509745 | Mar 2003 | JP |
| 2003141595 | May 2003 | JP |
| 2003143388 | May 2003 | JP |
| 2003150585 | May 2003 | JP |
| 2003228709 | Aug 2003 | JP |
| 2003242287 | Aug 2003 | JP |
| 2003534536 | Nov 2003 | JP |
| 2003345930 | Dec 2003 | JP |
| 2004077954 | Mar 2004 | JP |
| 2004102562 | Apr 2004 | JP |
| 2004171109 | Jun 2004 | JP |
| 2004213188 | Jul 2004 | JP |
| 2005038389 | Feb 2005 | JP |
| 2005192148 | Jul 2005 | JP |
| 2005217805 | Aug 2005 | JP |
| 2005352854 | Dec 2005 | JP |
| 2006107225 | Apr 2006 | JP |
| 2008523438 | Jul 2008 | JP |
| 11339049 | Oct 2008 | JP |
| 2008254443 | Oct 2008 | JP |
| 2009175925 | Aug 2009 | JP |
| 2012150348 | Aug 2012 | JP |
| 20050023050 | Mar 2005 | KR |
| 100933175 | Dec 2009 | KR |
| 101377663 | Mar 2014 | KR |
| 8002604 | Dec 1981 | NL |
| 2043201 | Sep 1995 | RU |
| 2065819 | Aug 1996 | RU |
| WO8500909 | Feb 1985 | WO |
| WO8502148 | May 1985 | WO |
| WO8706041 | Oct 1987 | WO |
| WO8900742 | Jan 1989 | WO |
| WO9007165 | Jun 1990 | WO |
| WO9106927 | May 1991 | WO |
| WO9108952 | Jun 1991 | WO |
| WO9111703 | Aug 1991 | WO |
| WO9111778 | Aug 1991 | WO |
| WO9112594 | Aug 1991 | WO |
| WO9118371 | Nov 1991 | WO |
| WO9119614 | Dec 1991 | WO |
| WO9204692 | Mar 1992 | WO |
| WO9208212 | May 1992 | WO |
| WO9214221 | Aug 1992 | WO |
| WO9216931 | Oct 1992 | WO |
| WO9217394 | Oct 1992 | WO |
| WO9220043 | Nov 1992 | WO |
| WO9220044 | Nov 1992 | WO |
| WO9300660 | Jan 1993 | WO |
| WO9309621 | May 1993 | WO |
| WO9322745 | Nov 1993 | WO |
| WO9323824 | Nov 1993 | WO |
| WO9401796 | Jan 1994 | WO |
| WO9406101 | Mar 1994 | WO |
| WO9406102 | Mar 1994 | WO |
| WO9408319 | Apr 1994 | WO |
| WO9416412 | Jul 1994 | WO |
| WO9419773 | Sep 1994 | WO |
| WO9423397 | Oct 1994 | WO |
| WO9502226 | Jan 1995 | WO |
| WO9504978 | Feb 1995 | WO |
| WO9506920 | Mar 1995 | WO |
| WO9509406 | Apr 1995 | WO |
| WO9510088 | Apr 1995 | WO |
| WO9513196 | May 1995 | WO |
| WO9513596 | May 1995 | WO |
| WO9519017 | Jul 1995 | WO |
| WO9519019 | Jul 1995 | WO |
| WO9523387 | Aug 1995 | WO |
| WO9524691 | Sep 1995 | WO |
| WO9534018 | Dec 1995 | WO |
| WO9725177 | Jul 1997 | WO |
| WO0005688 | Feb 2000 | WO |
| WO0024572 | May 2000 | WO |
| WO0045344 | Aug 2000 | WO |
| WO0046980 | Aug 2000 | WO |
| WO0048911 | Aug 2000 | WO |
| WO0058876 | Oct 2000 | WO |
| WO0065541 | Nov 2000 | WO |
| WO0065546 | Nov 2000 | WO |
| WO0070540 | Nov 2000 | WO |
| WO0108108 | Feb 2001 | WO |
| WO0118754 | Mar 2001 | WO |
| WO0125024 | Apr 2001 | WO |
| WO0143086 | Jun 2001 | WO |
| WO0154077 | Jul 2001 | WO |
| WO0159685 | Aug 2001 | WO |
| WO0159723 | Aug 2001 | WO |
| WO0162650 | Aug 2001 | WO |
| WO0163565 | Aug 2001 | WO |
| WO0186574 | Nov 2001 | WO |
| WO0186589 | Nov 2001 | WO |
| WO0191007 | Nov 2001 | WO |
| WO0199059 | Dec 2001 | WO |
| WO0216112 | Feb 2002 | WO |
| WO0216114 | Feb 2002 | WO |
| WO0229735 | Apr 2002 | WO |
| WO0231781 | Apr 2002 | WO |
| WO0250790 | Jun 2002 | WO |
| WO02054360 | Jul 2002 | WO |
| WO02071343 | Sep 2002 | WO |
| WO02054360 | Nov 2002 | WO |
| WO03005312 | Jan 2003 | WO |
| WO03019463 | Mar 2003 | WO |
| WO03028361 | Apr 2003 | WO |
| WO03028362 | Apr 2003 | WO |
| WO03029913 | Apr 2003 | WO |
| WO03030113 | Apr 2003 | WO |
| WO03052700 | Jun 2003 | WO |
| WO03052701 | Jun 2003 | WO |
| WO03054807 | Jul 2003 | WO |
| WO03054808 | Jul 2003 | WO |
| WO03067532 | Aug 2003 | WO |
| WO03079300 | Sep 2003 | WO |
| WO03085610 | Oct 2003 | WO |
| WO03087991 | Oct 2003 | WO |
| WO03087991 | Oct 2003 | WO |
| WO03107279 | Dec 2003 | WO |
| WO03107280 | Dec 2003 | WO |
| WO03107282 | Dec 2003 | WO |
| WO2004010367 | Jan 2004 | WO |
| WO2004025548 | Mar 2004 | WO |
| WO2004025549 | Mar 2004 | WO |
| WO2004027717 | Apr 2004 | WO |
| WO2004036508 | Apr 2004 | WO |
| WO2004038631 | May 2004 | WO |
| WO2004044853 | May 2004 | WO |
| WO2004057525 | Jul 2004 | WO |
| WO2004068422 | Aug 2004 | WO |
| WO2004070667 | Aug 2004 | WO |
| WO2004097826 | Nov 2004 | WO |
| WO2004109479 | Dec 2004 | WO |
| WO2005004039 | Jan 2005 | WO |
| WO2005004797 | Jan 2005 | WO |
| WO2005008088 | Jan 2005 | WO |
| WO2005013209 | Feb 2005 | WO |
| WO2005017842 | Feb 2005 | WO |
| WO2005027032 | Mar 2005 | WO |
| WO2005028348 | Mar 2005 | WO |
| WO2005029240 | Mar 2005 | WO |
| WO2005029447 | Mar 2005 | WO |
| WO2005036445 | Apr 2005 | WO |
| WO2005041134 | May 2005 | WO |
| WO2005048256 | May 2005 | WO |
| WO2005053864 | Jun 2005 | WO |
| WO2005076229 | Aug 2005 | WO |
| WO2005078651 | Aug 2005 | WO |
| WO2005080088 | Sep 2005 | WO |
| WO2005086158 | Sep 2005 | WO |
| WO2005088517 | Sep 2005 | WO |
| WO2005088533 | Sep 2005 | WO |
| WO2005088563 | Sep 2005 | WO |
| WO2005096233 | Oct 2005 | WO |
| WO2005118443 | Dec 2005 | WO |
| WO2005122100 | Dec 2005 | WO |
| WO2006012420 | Feb 2006 | WO |
| WO2006016112 | Feb 2006 | WO |
| WO2006016114 | Feb 2006 | WO |
| WO2006021083 | Mar 2006 | WO |
| WO2006039439 | Apr 2006 | WO |
| WO2006076289 | Jul 2006 | WO |
| WO2006076634 | Jul 2006 | WO |
| WO2006086531 | Aug 2006 | WO |
| WO2006132584 | Dec 2006 | WO |
| WO2007012815 | Feb 2007 | WO |
| WO2007012821 | Feb 2007 | WO |
| WO2007028799 | Mar 2007 | WO |
| WO2007044570 | Apr 2007 | WO |
| WO2007071788 | Jun 2007 | WO |
| WO2007072044 | Jun 2007 | WO |
| WO2007072048 | Jun 2007 | WO |
| WO2007080375 | Jul 2007 | WO |
| WO2007090437 | Aug 2007 | WO |
| WO2007111548 | Oct 2007 | WO |
| WO2007120825 | Oct 2007 | WO |
| WO2007143128 | Dec 2007 | WO |
| WO2007144598 | Dec 2007 | WO |
| WO2008030356 | Mar 2008 | WO |
| WO2008112132 | Sep 2008 | WO |
| WO2008150133 | Dec 2008 | WO |
| WO2009081085 | Jul 2009 | WO |
| WO2009141576 | Nov 2009 | WO |
| WO2010004281 | Jan 2010 | WO |
| WO2010004282 | Jan 2010 | WO |
| WO2011109569 | Sep 2011 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| US 6,009,171, 12/1999, Fetovich et al. (withdrawn) |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60408511 | Sep 2002 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 14744606 | Jun 2015 | US |
| Child | 15010749 | US | |
| Parent | 14537084 | Nov 2014 | US |
| Child | 14744606 | US | |
| Parent | 13459369 | Apr 2012 | US |
| Child | 14537084 | US | |
| Parent | 10655625 | Sep 2003 | US |
| Child | 13459369 | US |
