The invention relates to authorization of customer premise equipment into a network.
Several communication systems use a shared medium for exchange of information. Examples of such communication systems include HomePlug AV based powerline communication systems, IEEE 802.11 based wireless communications systems and DOCSIS based cable modem system. Due to the shared nature of the medium, signals transmitted in these systems can also be received by unauthorized device. To protect privacy and to prevent rogue devices from accessing the network, these systems incorporate security. Secure systems use authorization process to determine if the device can be admitted into the network. Remote authentication dial in user service (RADIUS) is an example of common authorization system. Authorized devices are provided with the encryptions keys that are used to encryption information transmitted over the medium, thus protecting privacy of the information. Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) is another encryption mechanism used by various communication systems.
The following are various aspects described herein. In various implementations, systems, methods, apparatuses and computer program products are provided. In an example, methods are disclosed, which include: providing a public network membership key associated with a network; receiving a connection request encrypted using the public network membership key from a device; permitting limited access to the network from the device based on the connection request being encrypted using the public network membership key; exchanging registration information from a user associated with the device; and, providing a unique network membership key based on receipt of the registration information.
Example systems can include a network termination unit, a registration system and an authorization server. The network termination unit can receive a network connection request from a customer premise equipment (CPE) device and can provide limited access to the CPE device based upon the network connection request being encrypted using a public network membership key. The registration system can enable exchange of registration information with a user associated with the CPE device. The authorization server can provide a unique network membership key based upon receipt of customer registration information, and can instruct the network termination unit and an associated headend station to provide limited access to the network based upon the public network membership key while providing service level access based upon the unique network membership key and a unique identifier associated with the customer premise equipment device.
Other example authorization methods can include: receiving a connection request encrypted using the public network membership key from a device, the connection request comprising a unique identifier associated with the device; determining that the device is authorized for service level access based upon the unique identifier; retrieving a device access key associated with the unique identifier; and, providing a unique network membership key encrypted using the retrieved device access key.
Other implementations and examples will be found in the detailed description, drawings and claims.
There are a many possible implementations of the invention, some example implementations are described below. However, such examples are descriptions of various implementations, and not descriptions of the invention, which is not limited to the detailed implementations described in this section but is described in broader terms in the claims.
A BPLN can include one or more cells. A cell is a group of broadband power line (BPL) devices in a BPLN that have similar characteristics such as association management, security, QoS and channel access settings, for example. Cells in a BPLN are logically isolated from each other, and communication to and from the backhaul occurs within the cell. Each cell in a BPLN includes a core-cell and may also include one or more sub-cells. There can be more than one cell on a given physical power line medium.
A core-cell includes a group of devices in a BPLN that includes a head end (HE), repeaters (R), and network termination units (NTU), but can exclude customer premise equipment (CPE). The head end (HE) is a device that bridges a cell to the backhaul network. At a given time, a cell will have one active head end and the head end manages the cell including the core-cell and any associated sub-cells. A repeater (RP) is a device that selectively retransmits media access control (MAC) service data units (MSDUs) to extend the effective range and bandwidth of the BPLN cell. Repeaters can also perform routing and quality of service (QoS) functions. The NTU is a device that connects a BPLN cell to the end users' network or devices. The NTU may in some cases bridge to other network technologies such as WiFi. A single NTU can serve more than one customer. Each Sub-Cell is associated with an active NTU. In some implementations, an HE, an NTU and/or an RP can be co-located at a single station. Thus, a single device may be designed to perform multiple functions. For example, a single device can simultaneously be programmed to perform the tasks associated with an RP and an NTU.
Various types of CPE devices (e.g., a computer) can be used as endpoint nodes in the network and such devices can communicate with other nodes in the network through the NTU.
Each node in the network communicates as a communication “station” (STA) using a PHY layer protocol that is used by the nodes to send transmissions to any other stations that are close enough to successfully receive the transmissions. STAs that cannot directly communicate with each other use one or more repeater STAs to communicate with each other. Any of a variety of communication system architectures can be used to implement the portion of the network interface module that converts data to and from a signal waveform that is transmitted over the communication medium. An application running on a station can provide data to and receives data from the network interface module. A MSDU is a segment of information received by the MAC layer. The MAC layer can process the received MSDUs and prepares them to generate “MAC protocol data units” (MPDUs). A MPDU is a segment of information including header and payload fields that the MAC layer has asked the PHY layer to transport. An MPDU can have any of a variety of formats based on the type of data being transmitted. A “PHY protocol data unit (PPDU)” refers to the modulated signal waveform representing an MPDU that is transmitted over the power line by the physical layer.
Apart from generating MPDUs from MSDUs, the MAC layer can provide several functions including channel access control, providing the required QoS for the MSDUs, retransmission of corrupt information, routing and repeating. Channel access control enables stations to share the powerline medium. Several types of channel access control mechanisms like carrier sense multiple access with collision avoidance (CSMA/CA), centralized Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA), distributed TDMA, token based channel access, etc., can be used by the MAC. Similarly, a variety of retransmission mechanism can also be used. The Physical layer (PHY) can also use a variety of techniques to enable reliable and efficient transmission over the transmission medium (power line, coax, twisted pair etc). Various modulation techniques like Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM), Wavelet modulations can be used. Forward error correction (FEC) code line Viterbi codes, Reed-Solomon codes, concatenated code, turbo codes, low density parity check code, etc., can be employed by the PHY to overcome errors. A preferred implementation of the MAC and PHY layers used by powerline medium is that based on HomePlug AV specification.
One implementation of the PHY layers is to use OFDM modulation. In OFDM modulation, data are transmitted in the form of OFDM “symbols.” Each symbol has a predetermined time duration or symbol time TS. Each symbol is generated from a superposition of N sinusoidal carrier waveforms that are orthogonal to each other and form the OFDM carriers. Each carrier has a peak frequency fi and a phase Φi measured from the beginning of the symbol. For each of these mutually orthogonal carriers, a whole number of periods of the sinusoidal waveform is contained within the symbol time TS. Equivalently, each carrier frequency is an integral multiple of a frequency interval Δf=1/TS. The phases Φi and amplitudes Ai of the carrier waveforms can be independently selected (according to an appropriate modulation scheme) without affecting the orthogonality of the resulting modulated waveforms. The carriers occupy a frequency range between frequencies fl and fN referred to as the OFDM bandwidth.
The CPE devices 205a-d can communicate with the headend 215 through a network of network termination units 220a-d and repeaters 225a-d. In some implementations, the network termination units can operate to translate the data signals from the CPE devices in any of a variety of communications protocols onto a powerline network. For example, a CPE 205a-d might communicate with an NTU 220a-d using a IEEE 802.11 wireless protocol, and the NTU 220a-d can convert the wireless signal to a signal suitable for transmission on a powerline medium.
In various implementations, repeaters 225a-d can be located throughout the powerline network to provide the ability for a data signal to travel on the powerline carrier medium over long distances. As discussed above, the headend 215 can provide a gateway for the data signal to be transferred to a backhaul network 210. For example, the headend 215 can extract the data signal from the powerline network and convert the signal for transmission on a packet switched network such as the Internet. In various implementations, one or more of the repeaters 225a-d can be equipped to transfer the signal from the powerline network to the backhaul network 210.
In some implementations, the headend 215 can also include an authorization server. A preferred implementation is to have the Authorization Server on the Backhaul Network 210. The authorization server can be operable to authenticate CPE devices 205a-d for transmission of data over the powerline network. When a CPE device 205a-d is not authenticated, in various implementations, the CPE device 205a-d can be provided access to a registration server 230. The registration server 230, in various implementations, can enable the user of a CPE device 205a-d to register the CPE device 205a-d with the network to obtain access to the powerline network.
In various implementations, the registration server 230 can provide a limited registration to a CPE device 205a-d to try the powerline network. For example, the registration can be limited by a period of time, bandwidth, destination address, or any other limitation that might allow the user to have limited access to the network. In additional implementations, the registration server 230 can require payment prior to using the network. For example, the registration server can provide web pages operable to collect payment information from the user. In various implementations, the registration server can allow the user to pay for any of a variety of different access plans. For example, an access plan might allow a user to purchase access for a specified period of time, at a specified bandwidth, or combinations thereof. In some implementations the registration server and authorization server can be co-located as shown in
In various implementations, based upon receipt of a connection request using the publicly available NMK, the headend 430 can provide access to a registration server 460. The registration server 460 can enable the user of the CPE device 410 to provide further information 480 to obtain further access to the powerline network or to the backhaul network 420. In some implementations, the headend 430 can authorize the CPE device 410 for limited access 490 to the backhaul network 420 based upon receiving the publicly available NMK. In various implementations, the NTU can be configured to provide limited access to new CPE devices without sending an explicit connection request to the HE.
In some implementations, the connection request from the CPE device 410 is unencrypted. In such implementations, the headend 430 can provide the CPE device 410 with the publicly available NMK, thereby enabling the CPE device 410 to access limited services through the powerline network, including, for example, the registration server 460.
In some implementations, once a user has registered the CPE device 410, the CPE device 410 can be provided access 490 to the backhaul network 420. In various implementations, the access 490 to the backhaul network 420 can be limited based upon a service level subscribed to by the user of the CPE device 410. The access 490 can be limited for example by the NTU 440, the headend 430, or a combination thereof.
The headend or authorization server 530 can determine whether the device is authorized to use the network based upon the connection request. For example, if the connection request is encrypted using a publicly available network management key (NMK), the device can be approved for limited access to the network. The publicly available NMK can be distributed using any of a variety of distribution schemes. For example, a website associated with a powerline network can provide the key, the headend can provide the publicly available key upon receiving a connection request, the key can be e-mailed, communicated by telephone, etc.
Upon authorizing the new device 510 using the publicly available NMK, the headend 530 can notify the NTU 520 that the device 510 is approved for limited access as shown at signals (3) and (4). The NTU 520 can then limit the access of the CPE device 510 to certain destinations, specified bandwidth or a specified period of time. In some implementations, a period of free usage can be provided and the network can require the user to register to receive additional service at the end of the period of free usage.
In
In various implementations, the unique NMK can enable the CPE device 510 to associate with a sub-cell of the powerline network. In some examples, association with a sub-cell of the network enable the CPE device 510 to communicate with the backhaul network 550 using the NTU 520, as shown by signals (8) and (9).
In some implementations, anew CPE device 600 (e.g., AV-CPE or BPL-CPE of
The NTU 601 can forward the connection request to a headend (HE) or to an authorization server (AS) 602 as shown by signal 610. In various implementations the authorization server can provide centralized management of authorization (e.g., providing the NMK to an authorized device) and authentication (e.g., providing the NEK for a station with a valid NMK). In other implementations, distributed management of authorization and authentication can be provided, for example, using multiple headend devices. In further implementations, the forwarded connection request can be encrypted using the publicly available NMK. In other implementations, the connection request can be encrypted using a network encryption key (NEK) prior to forwarding the connection request to the HE or AS.
In some implementations, the HE or AS 602 can provide the publicly available NMK to the NTU as shown by signal 615. In other implementations, the NTU can include the ability to recognize the publicly available NMK and merely provides notification of the use of the publicly available NMK to the HE or AS 602.
The NTU can approve the connection request based on the response from the HE or AS 602 as shown by signal 620. The CPE device 600 can then begin communicating with the NTU 601 as shown by signal 625. In some implementations, the NTU can filter the data received from the CPE device based on the provision of limited access to the CPE device using the publicly available NMK. For instance, in some implementations, the NTU 601 might only allow access to a registration system 603 as shown by signal 630 based upon the CPE device being connected to the network using the publicly available NMK.
In some implementations, the NTU 601 and/or the AS or HE 602 can provide limited access to content including providing access only to content provided by the service provider or content provided by the registration system 603. In other implementations, access to the network using the public NMK can be limited to a certain amount of time. In still further implementations, packets communicated to the network by a CPE device using the public NMK can be tagged by the NTU 601. The tags can be used by network stations to specify special handling (e.g., low priority, high priority, bandwidth restrictions, etc.) for packets that have been marked using the tags.
In some implementations, the registration system 603 can provide a registration site to the user, enabling the user to submit registration information to obtain a service level access. In some implementations, data can be exchanged using various secure communications mechanisms, such as, for example, a secure hypertext transfer protocol (HTTPS). The registration information, in some implementations, can include payment information. In further implementations, the registration information can also include service level information (e.g., which level of service the user wants to purchase). In still further implementations, the registration information can include a device access key communicated using a secure communication protocol to the registration system 603.
Registration for service level access can include registering for any of several service levels, each of the service levels providing varying levels of service based upon the registration information provided by the user. For example, a user might be want to purchase 10 Mbps service for a day, while another user might want to purchase 5 Mbps service for a month. The service levels can be monitored and administered by the NTU 601 in conjunction with the HE or AS 602.
Once registration information is received, the HE or AS 602 can provide the CPE device 600 with a unique NMK as shown by signal 635. In some implementations (and as described throughout this application), the unique NMK is substantially unique. For example, there may be two identical NMKs. However, the identical NMKs are uniquely associated with a unique identifier (e.g., a MAC address) such that the combination of the NMK and the MAC address is unique. The unique NMK can be encrypted using a device access key (DAK) associated with the CPE device 600. The DAK key can be obtained during an initial registration process, and can be used to maintain secrecy of the unique NMK. Upon receipt of the unique NMK, the CPE device 600 can be associated with the NTU 601 by a sub-cell (e.g., sub-net).
The CPE device 600 can then communicate with an external network 604 (e.g., the internet) through the NTU 601 as shown by signals 640 and 645. The NTU can provide service throttling based on a service level associated with the CPE device 600 as identified by the unique NMK. The external network 604 can also communicate information to the CPE device 600, for example, based on requests issued by the CPE device 600, as shown by signal 650.
At stage 710, limited service can be authorized based on the network connection request. In various embodiments, limited service can be authorized, for example, by a NTU (e.g., NTU 220 of
At stage 720, registration information can be received. Registration information can be received, for example, by a headend (e.g., headend 215 of
At stage 730, a unique NMK can be provided. The unique NMK can be provided, for example, by a headend device (e.g., headend 215 of
The systems and methods disclosed herein may use data signals conveyed using networks (e.g., local area network, wide area network, internet, etc.), fiber optic medium, carrier waves, wireless networks (e.g., wireless local area networks, wireless metropolitan area networks, cellular networks, etc.), etc. for communication with one or more data processing devices (e.g., mobile devices). The data signals can carry any or all of the data disclosed herein that is provided to or from a device.
The methods and systems described herein may be implemented on many different types of processing devices by program code comprising program instructions that are executable by one or more processors. The software program instructions may include source code, object code, machine code, or any other stored data that is operable to cause a processing system to perform methods described herein.
The systems and methods may be provided on many different types of computer-readable media including computer storage mechanisms (e.g., CD-ROM, diskette, RAM, flash memory, computer's hard drive, etc.) that contain instructions for use in execution by a processor to perform the methods' operations and implement the systems described herein.
The computer components, software modules, functions and data structures described herein may be connected directly or indirectly to each other in order to allow the flow of data needed for their operations. It is also noted that software instructions or a module can be implemented for example as a subroutine unit of code, or as a software function unit of code, or as an object (as in an object-oriented paradigm), or as an applet, or in a computer script language, or as another type of computer code or firmware. The software components and/or functionality may be located on a single device or distributed across multiple devices depending upon the situation at hand.
This written description sets forth the best mode of the invention and provides examples to describe the invention and to enable a person of ordinary skill in the art to make and use the invention. This written description does not limit the invention to the precise terms set forth. Thus, while the invention has been described in detail with reference to the examples set forth above, those of ordinary skill in the art may effect alterations, modifications and variations to the examples without departing from the scope of the invention.
As used in the description herein and throughout the claims that follow, the meaning of “a,” “an,” and “the” includes plural reference unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Also, as used in the description herein and throughout the claims that follow, the meaning of “in” includes “in” and “on” unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Finally, as used in the description herein and throughout the claims that follow, the meanings of “and” and “or” include both the conjunctive and disjunctive and may be used interchangeably unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.
Ranges may be expressed herein as from “about” one particular value, and/or to “about” another particular value. When such a range is expressed, another embodiment includes from the one particular value and/or to the other particular value. Similarly, when values are expressed as approximations, by use of the antecedent “about,” it will be understood that the particular value forms another embodiment. It will be further understood that the endpoints of each of the ranges are significant both in relation to the other endpoint, and independently of the other endpoint.
These and other implementations are within the scope of the following claims.
This application is a utility of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/941,949, entitled “MANAGING COMMUNICATIONS OVER A SHARED MEDIUM,” filed on Jun. 4, 2007, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4578530 | Zeidler | Mar 1986 | A |
4689786 | Sidhu et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4807248 | Pyatt et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
5328530 | Semiatin et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5359625 | Vander Mey et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5570355 | Dail et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5682428 | Johnson | Oct 1997 | A |
5732076 | Ketseoglou et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
6074086 | Yonge, III | Jun 2000 | A |
6111919 | Yonge, III | Aug 2000 | A |
6141355 | Palmer et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6167137 | Marino et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6173400 | Perlman et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185185 | Bass et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6188690 | Holden et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6189040 | Oohara | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6201794 | Stewart et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6243761 | Mogul et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6269132 | Yonge, III | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6269163 | Rivest et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272135 | Nakatsugawa | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6278685 | Yonge, III | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6307940 | Yamamoto | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6310892 | Olkin | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6388995 | Gai et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6519231 | Ding et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6574195 | Roberts | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6591364 | Patel | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6606303 | Hassel et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6631136 | Chowdhury et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6711163 | Reid et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6775656 | Gettwart et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6804252 | Johnson | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6904462 | Sinha | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6910136 | Wasserman et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
7039021 | Kokudo | May 2006 | B1 |
7085284 | Negus | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7181620 | Hur | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7234058 | Baugher et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7346021 | Yoshizawa et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7350076 | Young et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7352770 | Yonge, III | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7369579 | Logvinov et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7409543 | Bjorn | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7496039 | Yamada et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7506042 | Ayyagari | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7558294 | Yonge, III | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7609681 | Kurobe et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7756039 | Yonge, III | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7797751 | Hughes et al. | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7826618 | Klingler et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7894487 | Yonge, III | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7949356 | Yonge, III | May 2011 | B2 |
8112358 | Yonge, III | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8170051 | Yonge et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
20010000709 | Takahashi et al. | May 2001 | A1 |
20020015496 | Weaver et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020025810 | Takayama et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020029260 | Dobbins et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020060986 | Fukushima et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020097679 | Berenbaum | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020107023 | Chari et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020114303 | Crosbie et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020122411 | Zimmerman et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020124177 | Harper et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020137462 | Rankin | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020141417 | Umayabashi | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030012166 | Benveniste | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018812 | Lakshminarayana et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030048183 | Vollmer et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030067892 | Beyer et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030086437 | Benveniste | May 2003 | A1 |
20030095551 | Gotoh et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030137993 | Odman | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030193959 | Lui et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030224784 | Hunt et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030228846 | Berliner et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030229783 | Hardt | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040047319 | Elg | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040070912 | Kopp | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040081089 | Ayyagari et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040090982 | Xu | May 2004 | A1 |
20040165532 | Poor et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040190542 | Ono et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040210630 | Simonnet et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040218577 | Nguyen et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040234073 | Sato et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040264428 | Choi et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050001694 | Berkman | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021539 | Short et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050025176 | Ko et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050068227 | Caspi et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050071631 | Langer | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050089005 | Sakoda et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050114489 | Yonge, III | May 2005 | A1 |
20050117515 | Miyake | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050117750 | Rekimoto | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050135291 | Ketchum et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050147075 | Terry | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050169222 | Ayyagari et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050190785 | Yonge, III et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050210157 | Sakoda | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050243765 | Schrader et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050249186 | Kelsey et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060002406 | Ishihara et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060039371 | Castro et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060072517 | Barrow et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060077997 | Yamaguchi et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060104301 | Beyer et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060159260 | Pereira et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060168647 | Chiloyan | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060224813 | Rooholamini et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060251021 | Nakano et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060256741 | Nozaki | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060268746 | Wijting et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070025244 | Ayyagari et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070025384 | Ayyagari et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070025391 | Yonge, III et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070026794 | Ayyagari et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070030811 | Frei et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070053520 | Eckleder | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070058661 | Chow | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070058732 | Riedel et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070060141 | Kangude et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070097867 | Kneckt et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118730 | Platt | May 2007 | A1 |
20070133388 | Lee et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070133449 | Schacht et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070140185 | Garg et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070147322 | Agrawal et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070220570 | Dawson et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070271398 | Manchester et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070286074 | Xu | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080002599 | Yau et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080151820 | Solis et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080181219 | Chen et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080186230 | Wengler et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080212591 | Wu et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080222447 | Ram et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080279126 | Katar et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080298252 | Yonge, III | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080298589 | Katar et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080298590 | Katar et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080298594 | Yonge, III | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080301052 | Yonge, III et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080310414 | Yonge, III | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090010276 | Yonge, III | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090011782 | Yonge, III et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090034552 | Yonge, III | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090040930 | Yonge, III et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090067389 | Lee et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090074007 | Yonge, III | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090106551 | Boren et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090116461 | Yonge, III | May 2009 | A1 |
20090154487 | Ryan et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090311963 | Haverty | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100014444 | Ghanadan et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100091760 | Yoon | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100100724 | Kaliski, Jr. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20120072715 | Yonge, III | Mar 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1748574 | Jan 2007 | EP |
1748597 | Jan 2007 | EP |
1179919 | Jul 2010 | EP |
3107317 | May 1991 | JP |
2002135177 | May 2002 | JP |
2005073240 | Mar 2005 | JP |
WO9634329 | Oct 1996 | WO |
WO9857439 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO02103943 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO03100996 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO2004038980 | May 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Afkhamie et al., “An Overview of the upcoming HomePlug AV Standard”, May 2005, IEEE 0-7803-8844-5-05, pp. 400-404. |
European Search Report—EP09178487, Search Authority , Munich Patent Office, Jan. 21, 2010. |
Faure, Jean-Philippe et al., Call for Submissions. Draft Standard for Broadband over Power Line Networks: Medium Access Control and Physical Layer Specifications. Feb. 14, 2007, 4 pages. |
Faure, Jean-Philippe et al., Coexistence/interoperability Cluster, FTR SG Requirements. Draft Standard for Broadband over Power Line Networks: Medium Access Control and Physical Layer Specifications. Feb. 5, 2007 , 13 pages. |
HomePlug Powerline Alliance Inc., “HomePlug AV White Paper,” Doc. Ver. No. HPAVWP—050818, Aug. 2005, pp. 1-11. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion—PCT/US2008/065811, International Searching Authority, European Patent Office, Nov. 25, 2008. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion—PCT/US2008/065831, International Searching Authority, European Patent Office, Feb. 20, 2009, 22 pages. |
Katar et al., “Beacon Schedule Persistence to Mitigate Beacon Loss in HomePlug AV Networks,” May 2006, IEEE 1-4244-0113-05/06, pp. 184-188. |
Lee et al., “HomePlug 1.0 Powerline Communication LANs-Protocol Description and Performance Results version 5.4,” 2000, International Journal of Communication Systems, 2000 00: 1-6, pp. 1-25. |
Loh et al, Quality of Support and priority Management in HomePNA 2.0 Link Layer, IEEE, 6 pages, 2003. |
Notification of First Office Action, The State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China, issued in Chinese Application No. 200610107587.1, dated Oct. 11, 2010, 6 pages. |
Notification of Reasons for Rejection, Japanese Patent Office, issued in Japanese Patent Application No. 2006-205200, dated Jan. 18, 2011, 3 pages. |
Opera Specification-Part 1: Technology, Open PLC European Research Alliance, 198 pages, 1006. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/970,297 Final Office Action”, Apr. 16, 2012, 32 pages. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/133,301 Office Action”, Mar. 1, 2012, 38 pages. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 13/113,474, filed May 23, 2011, 32 pages. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/970,297 Office Action”, Mar. 30, 2011, 30 pages. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/970,297 Office Action”, Sep. 29, 2011, 31 pages. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/970,323 Office Action”, Dec. 7, 2010, 12 pages. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/970,339 Final Office Action”, Jul. 7, 2011, 14 pages. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/970,339 Office Action”, Jan. 19, 2011, 22 pages. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/970,339 Office Action”, Jun. 18, 2012, 26 pages. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/971,446 Office Action”, Feb. 15, 2011, 20 pages. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/971,446 Final Office Action”, Jul. 1, 2011, 17 pages. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/108,334 Final Office Action”, Jun. 14, 2011, 28 pages. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/108,334 Office Action”, Feb. 16, 2011, 26 pages. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/108,334 Office Action”, Aug. 3, 2010, 20 pages. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/108,334 Office Action”, Aug. 3, 2012, 18 pages. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/133,270 Final Office Action”, Nov. 18, 2011, 23 pages. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/133,270 Office Action”, Jun. 3, 2011, 67 pages. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/133,301 Final Office Action”, Mar. 22, 2011, 39 pages. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/133,301 Office Action”, Sep. 22, 2010, 42 pages. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/133,312 Final Office Action”, Feb. 16, 2011, 24 pages. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/133,312 Office Action”, Jun. 8, 2011, 24 pages. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/133,312 Office Action”, Jul. 28, 2010, 29 pages. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/133,315 Final Office Action”, Jun. 9, 2011, 38 pages. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/133,315 Final Office Action”, Jul. 20, 2010, 30 pages. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/133,315 Office Action”, Aug. 9, 2012, 37 pages. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/133,315 Office Action”, Dec. 24, 2009, 28 pages. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/133,315 Office Action”, Dec. 28, 2010, 36 pages. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/133,325 Final Office Action”, Dec. 9, 2010, 33 pages. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/133,325 Office Action”, May 27, 2010, 31 pages. |
“European Search Report—EP09178487, Search Authority, Munich Patent Office”, Jan. 21, 2010 , 2 pages. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/133,301 Final Office Action”, Sep. 26, 2012, 54 pages. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/133,301 Office Action”, Mar. 1, 2012 , 38 pages. |
Muir A., et al., “An Efficient Packet Sensing MAC Protocol for Wireless Networks”, Computer Engineering Department School of Engineering, University of California, Aug. 1998, pp. 20. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/303,913 Office Action, Dec. 26, 2012, 37 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/970,339 Final Office Action, Dec. 11, 2012, 25 pages. |
Notification of First Office Action, The State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China, issued in Chinese Application No. 200880100486.9, Nov. 21, 2012, 11 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080301446 A1 | Dec 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60941949 | Jun 2007 | US |